Simple fix to #434272?
Hi! There seems to be a _very_ simple fix to #434272 - I have attached a patch that _I_ guess would fix it. The reason that I am sending it here and not to the bug is that I am not at all very sure about the proper way to handle this (I am not a DD in any way.) and I am not 100% sure that all is like it should with my patch. (it is a one-line change.) /Andreas --- xfce4-taskmanager-0.4.0~rc2/src/xfce-taskmanager-linux.c 2006-08-23 20:05:42.0 +0200 +++ xfce4-taskmanager-0.4.0~rc2/src/xfce-taskmanager-linux-patched.c 2008-04-16 19:16:37.0 +0200 @@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ task.time = stime + utime; task.old_time = task.time; task.time_percentage = 0; + + task.rss=task.rss/1024; } task.uid = status.st_uid; passwdp = getpwuid(task.uid);
Re: yorick-yeti built on mips but not installed after two weeks
[Thibaut Paumard] One of my packages, [1]yorick-yeti has been [2]built successfully on all official platforms, including [3]mips on Fri 28 Mar, but the mips package is still [2]not installed on the archive. It is held out of Lenny for this reason. I sent an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue 8 Apr to no avail. What should I do to get the package to transition? Some options: - Ask the release managers for help on getting the mips build uploaded. - Ask ftpmaster to remove the mips binary packages to allow the package to migrate without mips build. - Continue to try to reach the mips buildd maintainers. There might be others. Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Simple fix to #434272?
On Freitag, 18. April 2008, Andreas Rönnquist wrote: There seems to be a _very_ simple fix to #434272 - I have attached a patch that _I_ guess would fix it. The reason that I am sending it here and not to the bug is that I am not at all very sure about the proper way to handle this (I am not a DD in any way.) and I am not 100% sure that all is like it should with my patch. Don't be shy. Just send it to the bug report ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). :) Kindly Christoph signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
RFS: john (adopted and updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.7.2-1 of the package john, which I'm adopting. It builds these binary packages: john - active password cracking tool john-data - active password cracking tool - character sets john-data is a new package, which contains architecture-independent data for john. I believe no one needs the long description for john -- as it's a *really* famous password-cracking tool (aka John the Ripper). The package is lintian clean (lintian -iI on unstable). The upload would fix these bugs: 127920, 353108, 353151, 354634, 372154, 385856, 385858. It would also close 461992, which is the ITA. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/john/john_1.7.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Simple fix to #434272?
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:52:09 +0200 Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't be shy. Just send it to the bug report ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). :) Kindly Christoph Done. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: john (adopted and updated package)
Hi David! On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:19 AM, David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.7.2-1 of the package john, which I'm adopting. This one I have interest in sponsoring :-) I will take a look at it and soon I send you a message. Best regards, Nelson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: john (adopted and updated package)
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:30:55 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: Hi David! Hi Nelson, On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:19 AM, David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.7.2-1 of the package john, which I'm adopting. This one I have interest in sponsoring :-) I will take a look at it and soon I send you a message. Please don't try to run that john :) I've just found that I forgot to patch the path for john.conf -- it's looking in /usr/share/john/, while it's at /etc/john/. I'll contact you privately when it'll be ready -- it's not as trivial as it seems :( Thanks for the offer, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
RFS: wordpress
Dear mentors, I recently adopted the wordpress package and now I'm looking for a sponsor. The old sponsor (Lionel Elie Mamane) apparently doesn't want to sponsor it anymore. It builds these binary packages: wordpress - weblog manager The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 430781, 475284, 473451 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wordpress - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wordpress/wordpress_2.5.0-3.dsc or on git.debian.org: URL: http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/wordpress.git git: git://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/wordpress.git I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Andrea De Iacovo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFICMpVMXahCK22/rwRAonqAJ9immYd6e72Re8w1iBbGjefMgwHhwCglzcO ybH3v3C2BDu1Ul6MriTyQVw= =+TNe -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Installing PEAR packages in an idempotent fashion
Hi, My package needs a Pear package, specifically Pear Log, it has php-pear in its dependencies. The big problem is installing the package itself in, I presume, the postinst script. My early tests were simply: pear -q install log but I found that when the package was installed this process would quit with an error second time around, stopping the script from being idempotent. At some stage this problem seemed to evaporate (maybe with lenny). However, somebody installed the package (currently obtained directly from my repo) today on an etch system and the postinst barfed on this point - strangely one other person has done this with no problems. On Lenny, the behaviour is -=- imladris:/home/colin# pear -q install log Nothing to install imladris:/home/colin# echo $? 0 -=- On Etch -=- fs1:/usr/share/opus# pear install log Did not download optional dependencies: pear/MDB2, use --alldeps to download automatically Skipping package pear/Log, already installed as version 1.9.11 No valid packages found install failed fs1:/usr/share/opus# echo $? 1 fs1:/usr/share/opus# pear -q install log No valid packages found install failed fs1:/usr/share/opus# echo $? 1 -=- Has anybody any words of wisdom to offer on how to handle pear module installations in an idempotent fashion? Thanks, CT. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Installing PEAR packages in an idempotent fashion
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 05:13:29PM +0100, Colin Turner wrote:
Hi,
My package needs a Pear package, specifically Pear Log, it has php-pear
in its dependencies.
The big problem is installing the package itself in, I presume, the
postinst script. My early tests were simply:
pear -q install log
but I found that when the package was installed this process would quit
with an error second time around, stopping the script from being
idempotent. At some stage this problem seemed to evaporate (maybe with
lenny).
Has anybody any words of wisdom to offer on how to handle pear module
installations in an idempotent fashion?
You could read the source for pear and figure out under what
conditions it exits with an error, and avoid calling it in that case:
grep 'something' /path/somefile || pear -q install log.
You could also (perhaps) test in postinst the $2 value to see if the
package has been configured before (the earlier solution is better
IMO).
You could also test that, if it fails, it fails for that reason, and
allow that failure.
t=`tempfile`
trap 'rm -fv -- $t' EXIT
pear -q install log 2$tempfile || {
ret=$?
grep -Fx $the_error_message /dev/null $t || {
cat $t
exit $ret
}
}
rm -f -- $t
trap - EXIT
#Justin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Installing PEAR packages in an idempotent fashion
Hi, Colin Turner wrote: My package needs a Pear package, specifically Pear Log, it has php-pear in its dependencies. The big problem is installing the package itself in, I presume, the postinst script. My early tests were simply: pear -q install log I'm not very familiar with neither Pear nor PHP, but doesn't the php-log package provide this? If so, is there a reason to not just depend on it? Regards, Ansgar -- PGP: 1024D/595FAD19 739E 2D09 0969 BEA9 9797 B055 DDB0 2FF7 595F AD19 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
feedback on jcc package, please
Could I please get some feedback on the package jcc ? This is my first time using cdbs. http://www.jab.org/jcc/ Thanks, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: wordpress
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 12:21 AM, Andrea De Iacovo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I recently adopted the wordpress package and now I'm looking for a sponsor. The old sponsor (Lionel Elie Mamane) apparently doesn't want to sponsor it anymore. Are you in contact with the security team to fix the security issues still present in etch? http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/source-package/wordpress -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
