RFS: php5-rar
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package php5-rar. * Package name: php5-rar Version : 1.0.0-1 Upstream Author : Antony Dovgal [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://pecl.php.net/package/rar * License : PHP License Section : web It builds these binary packages: php5-rar - rar module for PHP 5 The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 365033 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/php5-rar - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/php5-rar/php5-rar_1.0.0-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. -- Deepak Tripathi E3 71V3 8Y C063 (We Live By Code) http://deepkatripathi.blogspot.com
Re: RFS: php5-rar
On 27/04/2008, Deepak Tripathi wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package php5-rar. Various remarks: - debian/Changelog, what for? - debian/control: buggy indentation in long description. - debian/control: unsure about the section, please check the php policy. - debian/copyright: you don't quote the GPL boilerplate, IIRC it's better to do so. - debian/pecl: Unsure what it's used for (there's only a commented dh_pecl in debian/rules). - debian/php5-rar.dirs: probably unnecessary. - debian/rules: sorry, but: what a mess! You probably want to get rid of everything v4-related, as well as all commented out rules. There's also dh_install instead of calling install with a zillion parameters. Mraw, KiBi. pgpEODnf79TaE.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: php5-rar
On 27/04/2008, Deepak Tripathi wrote: It builds these binary packages: php5-rar - rar module for PHP 5 Ah, I forgot that point: is the algo the same as in unrar? unrar-free? You might need to adjust the section in the former case; and to adjust the description for the latter, to be more precise about what that extension can do. Mraw, KiBi. pgp4hqiidXzMb.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: php5-rar
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 27/04/2008, Deepak Tripathi wrote: It builds these binary packages: php5-rar - rar module for PHP 5 Ah, I forgot that point: is the algo the same as in unrar? unrar-free? You might need to adjust the section in the former case; and to adjust the description for the latter, to be more precise about what that extension can do. Looking at the upstream tarball, it seems that it embeds a non-free rar library. Please change the section to non-free. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: gcin (updated package, closes RC bug #406036)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.4-3 of my package gcin. It closes RC bug #406036 (FTBFS on hppa, ia64 and sparc), and also closes #419366, #420504, and #436914. The patch which fixes the RC bug is provided by upstream author. I have tested it in qemu and it works fine. The only one lintian warning is W: gcin: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libgcin-im-client1. It is unnecessary to pack a libgcin-im-client1 package, because libgcin-im-client.so.1.0.2 is only used by gcin internally. It builds these binary packages: gcin - an GTK+ based input method platform for Chinese users gcin-qt3-immodule - an QT input method module with gcin as backend Description of gcin: Gcin is an input method platform, which supports GTK+/QT immodule and XIM. Gcin is focused mainly on Traditional Chinese. However, it is also very useful for Simplified Chinese, Japanese, and many other languages. . Input method table format of gcin is almost as same as those of xcin and scim. . This package contains an GTK+ immodule. If you want to use QT immodule, please install gcin-qt3-immodule package. Description of gcin-qt3-immodule: Gcin is an input method platform, which supports GTK+/QT immodule and XIM. . This package is the QT 3.x native input method module for gcin. . For more information about gcin, please check the description of gcin package. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gcin/gcin_1.3.4-3.dsc You can see the debdiff here: - - http://www.calno.com/moto/gcin/debdiff_1.3.4-2_to_1.3.4-3.txt A step by step HOWTO to test gcin: - - http://www.calno.com/moto/gcin-test/ I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Wen-Yen Chuang (caleb) References: * Package name : gcin Version: 1.3.4-3 Upstream Author: Edward Der-Hua Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL: http://www.csie.nctu.edu.tw/~cp76/gcin/ Download site : http://cle.linux.org.tw/gcin/download/ * License: LGPL Programing Language: C Section: utils - -- My GPG key is signed by Debian Developer Masayuki Hatta. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIFDjcdEpXpumNYVkRAhJ0AJ0VEeSI23vO0T96enWNQJKkT2ifwQCeMGO/ /WwmOLW8LKpZBMkoMwaFyF8= =I/lC -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: wordpress
Hi Andrea, On Friday 25 April 2008 18:08, Andrea De Iacovo wrote: I'm in contact with wordpress security team. With the next release I'll close at least 3 CVEs for wordpress-etch. cool. Very cool. At the moment I'm working in order to close other bugs too. You've seen http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2008/04/25/wordpress-25-cookie-integrity-protection-vulnerability/ ? regards, Holger pgpMBbAVNJTbV.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: gcin (updated package, closes RC bug #406036)
On 27/04/2008, Wen-Yen Chuang wrote: The only one lintian warning is W: gcin: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libgcin-im-client1. It is unnecessary to pack a libgcin-im-client1 package, because libgcin-im-client.so.1.0.2 is only used by gcin internally. I didn't build it, so I cannot check, but is that SO in /usr/lib? If so, and if it's a private library, it might be moved to a subdirectory of /usr/lib (and then used through a rpath). Mraw, KiBi. pgpZ6Fodoo7La.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: vexim
Daniel Knabl schrieb:
hi folks,
the original tarball can be found here:
* http://www.silverwraith.com/vexim/vexim2.2.1.tar.gz
You should punch the Upstream Author the next time he will make an new
release, he missed to remove the .svn directories.
any hints and tips are really welcome, also suggestions for further
improvement and features.
Okay some hints from myself:
* patches: Why did you called every patch with '01_'? I think you
should count them in an normal way (01, 02, 03 etc.).
Also your DP: lines are very very short and uninformative. You
should describe it an little bit more.
* Closing bugs: Yes your way will work but I would prefer if you
would remove the trailing 'Bug' from it, this seems very ugly.
* control: Is it *realy* right, that vexim-pgsql needs the php5-mysql
extension? This seems like to fast copy paste for me ;)
Also there are some useless depends, for example:
libapache2-mod-php5 | php5-cgi
Have a look at the 'php5' package, this will do the job for you.
Does it realy only work with apache{1,2} and lighthttpd? If not,
the depends should look like: apache2 | httpd
Also why do you depend on mysql-server / postgresql? Can't I use an
external one? You should just depend on the clients and set the
server ones as recommends or suggests.
* rules: Hm okay some useless debhelper calls and the problems which
Bernhard Link already stated. But you should seriously remove
dh_strip from the arch-independ target, this is quite wrong.
Also you should include dpatch (see for example cuetools or sbnc),
then you just need to add an unpatch and patch call in your
rules.
Also there are in many files many useless whitespaces at EOL and
newlines at EOF. ;)
So no more time today.. Good luck with it and I hope it will help you.
many thanks in advance
Daniel
--
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Keep directory in working tree, but exclude from foo.diff.gz
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 02:33:44PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:31:21PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Ben Finney wrote:
What would be the best way to keep such a directory in place, but
exclude the directory from the Debian source and binary packages?
dpkg-source -iregexp?
I am too lazy to type extra regexp
I have ~/.devscripts with:
DEBUILD_DPKG_BUILDPACKAGE_OPTS=-i -ICVS -I.svn -I.git
This doesn't have the same effect. The '-iEXCLUDE_REGEXP' option omits
files matching the Perl regexp 'EXCLUDE_REGEXP' from the 'foo.diff.gz'
Debian diff file. The '-IEXCLUDE_GLOB' option will omit files matching
the shell glob 'EXCLUDE_GLOB' from the 'foo.orig.tar.gz' tarball.
Yes. This was what I usually wanted as my packaging environment to exclude VCS
data from all source package files. (Initially, .svn and .git needed to be
excluded manually as I remember.)
Now that I checked latest command, -i and -I without argument seems to
be good enough since current default regexp is very exhaustive.
So this is good enough.
DEBUILD_DPKG_BUILDPACKAGE_OPTS=-i -I
It was good for me to check the latest command situation.
Osamu
PS: These exclusion lists are impressive.
-i defaults to this regex:
(?:^|/).*~$|(?:^|/)\.#.*$|(?:^|/)\..*\.swp$|(?:^|/),,.*(?:$|/.*$)|(?:^|/)(?:DEADJOE|\.cvsignore|\.arch-inventory|\.bzrignore|\.gitignore)$|(?:^|/)(?:CVS|RCS|\.deps|\{arch\}|\.arch-ids|\.svn|\.hg|_darcs|\.git|\.shelf|_MTN|\.bzr(?:\.backup|tags)?)(?:$|/.*$)')
-I defaults to:
-I*.a -I*.la -I*.o -I*.so -I*.swp -I*~ -I,,* -I.[#~]* -I.arch-ids
-I.arch-inventory -I.bzr -I.bzr.backup -I.bzr.tags -I.bzrignore -I.cvsignore
-I.deps -I.git -I.gitignore -I.hg -I.shelf -I.svn -ICVS -IDEADJOE -IRCS -I_MTN
-I_darcs -I{arch}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: gcin (updated package, closes RC bug #406036)
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 10:34:51AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: On 27/04/2008, Wen-Yen Chuang wrote: The only one lintian warning is W: gcin: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libgcin-im-client1. It is unnecessary to pack a libgcin-im-client1 package, because libgcin-im-client.so.1.0.2 is only used by gcin internally. I didn't build it, so I cannot check, but is that SO in /usr/lib? If so, and if it's a private library, it might be moved to a subdirectory of /usr/lib (and then used through a rpath). If it's not a private lib, you need also to fix these warnings: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol XInternAtom used by debian/gcin/usr/lib/libgcin-im-client.so.1.0.2 found in none of the libraries. dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol XGetWindowProperty used by debian/gcin/usr/lib/libgcin-im-client.so.1.0.2 found in none of the libraries. dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol XGetSelectionOwner used by debian/gcin/usr/lib/libgcin-im-client.so.1.0.2 found in none of the libraries. dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol XFree used by debian/gcin/usr/lib/libgcin-im-client.so.1.0.2 found in none of the libraries. Cheers, Gonéri signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: gcin (updated package, closes RC bug #406036)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Cyril Brulebois wrote: I didn't build it, so I cannot check, but is that SO in /usr/lib? If so, and if it's a private library, it might be moved to a subdirectory of /usr/lib (and then used through a rpath). The QT3 immodule of gcin depends on the .so file. I splitted it to the gcin-qt3-immodule package, since it depends on libqt3-mt. I will try rpath in next release. The major goal of current 1.3.4-3 is to fix the RC bug, so I would not try rpath (unless the sponsor asks me to do it). Kind regards Wen-Yen Chuang (caleb) - -- My GPG key is signed by Debian Developer Masayuki Hatta. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIFGRGdEpXpumNYVkRAi7bAJ9u5B7dY/UO23eQQB69xaq8s4t2yACfcinm GyTV0fuydGYHh+1kkp4Dmzs= =ec1e -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: wordpress
Hi Holger, * Holger Levsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-27 13:06]: On Friday 25 April 2008 18:08, Andrea De Iacovo wrote: [...] At the moment I'm working in order to close other bugs too. You've seen http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2008/04/25/wordpress-25-cookie-integrity-protection-vulnerability/ ? Already fixed in unstable. Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. http://people.debian.org/~nion/sponsoring-checklist.html pgpkZUrNM6KAR.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: magic
OoO Pendant le repas du samedi 26 avril 2008, vers 19:59, Aanjhan R [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait: Thanks for the quick look and your valuable remarks. I am not sure of what exactly I should be asking upstream. Is there a problem with GPL + BSD mix license? Sorry. I am not getting the problem. If you dont mind, can you please explain in detail the issue? Since there is no license file in the distribution of magic, there is no problem yet. You should first ask upstream to put a file LICENSE, COPYING or COPYRIGHT that states the license of the whole software. I suppose that he will choose a BSD license as stated on his web site. In this case, there is a problem because lib readline is GPL licensed. If upstream wants to license magic under non GPL license, he should drop the use of libreadline or use another library like libeditline. -- printk(Entering UltraSMPenguin Mode...\n); 2.2.16 /usr/src/linux/arch/sparc64/kernel/smp.c pgpLBYRNAkZJR.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: gcin (updated package, closes RC bug #406036)
Gonéri Le Bouder wrote: If it's not a private lib, you need also to fix these warnings: Done. I have made the libgcin-im-client.so a private library. Both GTK+ and QT3 immodules are still working fine. The previous lintian warning is gone, but a new one appears: W: gcin-qt3-immodule: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath ./usr/lib/qt3/plugins/inputmethods/libqgcin.so /usr/lib/gcin. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gcin/gcin_1.3.4-3.dsc A step by step HOWTO to test gcin: - http://www.calno.com/moto/gcin-test/ Kind regards Wen-Yen Chuang (caleb) -- My GPG key is signed by Debian Developer Masayuki Hatta. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: gcin (updated package, closes RC bug #406036)
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 08:57:15PM +0800, Wen-Yen Chuang wrote: Gonéri Le Bouder wrote: If it's not a private lib, you need also to fix these warnings: Done. I have made the libgcin-im-client.so a private library. Both GTK+ and QT3 immodules are still working fine. Sound good. Uploaded. Cheers, Gonéri signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: gcin (updated package, closes RC bug #406036)
Wen-Yen Chuang schrieb am 27.04.2008 14:57 Uhr: Gonéri Le Bouder wrote: If it's not a private lib, you need also to fix these warnings: Done. I have made the libgcin-im-client.so a private library. Both GTK+ and QT3 immodules are still working fine. The previous lintian warning is gone, but a new one appears: W: gcin-qt3-immodule: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath ./usr/lib/qt3/plugins/inputmethods/libqgcin.so /usr/lib/gcin. You can read more about that at http://wiki.debian.org/RpathIssue That should be fixed... Best Regards, Jan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Keep directory in working tree, but exclude from foo.diff.gz
Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Now that I checked latest command, -i and -I without argument seems to be good enough since current default regexp is very exhaustive. Okay. In this case, though, I have a directory in the working tree that *isn't* covered by the defaults for those options. PS: These exclusion lists are impressive. Yet sometimes they are insufficient. I wish there was a way to *add* to the '-i' option, instead of wiping it completely. Apparently, there isn't such a way. -- \ Anyone can do any amount of work provided it isn't the work he | `\ is supposed to be doing at the moment. -- Robert Benchley | _o__) | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: gcin (updated package, closes RC bug #406036)
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 03:54:16PM +0200, Jan Beyer wrote: Wen-Yen Chuang schrieb am 27.04.2008 14:57 Uhr: Gonéri Le Bouder wrote: If it's not a private lib, you need also to fix these warnings: Done. I have made the libgcin-im-client.so a private library. Both GTK+ and QT3 immodules are still working fine. The previous lintian warning is gone, but a new one appears: W: gcin-qt3-immodule: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath ./usr/lib/qt3/plugins/inputmethods/libqgcin.so /usr/lib/gcin. You can read more about that at http://wiki.debian.org/RpathIssue That should be fixed... Currently, the only generally accepted use of this feature in Debian is to add non-standard library path (like /usr/lib/package) to libraries that are only intended to be used by the executables or other libraries within the same source package. I think we are in this case. Cheers, Gonéri signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Keep directory in working tree, but exclude from foo.diff.gz
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:57:29PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Now that I checked latest command, -i and -I without argument seems to be good enough since current default regexp is very exhaustive. Okay. In this case, though, I have a directory in the working tree that *isn't* covered by the defaults for those options. PS: These exclusion lists are impressive. Yet sometimes they are insufficient. I wish there was a way to *add* to the '-i' option, instead of wiping it completely. Apparently, there isn't such a way. You can always recover defaults by dpkg-source -h|grep 'defaults to: ' and paste it to console with fix. or ... maybe send a patch to enable such thing to dpkg-dev maintainer :-) I do not thin you are the first to feel this way... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: php5-rar
Paul Wise wrote: On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 27/04/2008, Deepak Tripathi wrote: It builds these binary packages: php5-rar - rar module for PHP 5 Ah, I forgot that point: is the algo the same as in unrar? unrar-free? You might need to adjust the section in the former case; and to adjust the description for the latter, to be more precise about what that extension can do. Looking at the upstream tarball, it seems that it embeds a non-free rar library. I hardly see the ftpmasters allowing this package to go in, as it embeds some non-free source code, and the extension is released under the PHP licence version _3.0_ which usually gets pseudo-auto-REJECTED. Please change the section to non-free. Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: scim-array - SCIM IMEngine module for Array 30
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package scim-array. The upload would fix ITP: #452867 The package is lintian clean. * Package name : scim-array Version: 0.0.4-1 Upstream Author: Yu-Chun Wang albyu35 AT ms57 DOT hinet DOT net * URL: http://scimarray.openfoundry.org/index_en.html * License: GPL-2 or any later version Programing Language: C++ Section: utils It builds this binary package: scim-array - SCIM IMEngine module for Array 30 Long description: Smart Common Input Method (SCIM) is an input method server and a development platform to make input method developers' lives easier. Array 30 is an input method in Chinese. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scim-array/scim-array_0.0.4-1.dsc A step by step HOWTO to test scim-array: - - http://www.calno.com/moto/scim-array/ I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Wen-Yen Chuang (caleb) - -- My GPG key is signed by Debian Developer Masayuki Hatta. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIFJdbdEpXpumNYVkRAlVFAJwKw99g6cysXkXDUae4pFKuFV4FEwCeIDgn ULDDm0OR3ReQrRIIAN5IIdg= =NKXL -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: wordpress
2008/4/27 Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Holger, * Holger Levsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-27 13:06]: On Friday 25 April 2008 18:08, Andrea De Iacovo wrote: [...] At the moment I'm working in order to close other bugs too. You've seen http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2008/04/25/wordpress-25-cookie-integrity-protection-vulnerability/ ? Already fixed in unstable. Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. http://people.debian.org/~nion/sponsoring-checklist.html Yesterday evening we released new version 2.5.1 wich fixes some bugs (also the one you mentioned). Nico uploaded the package for me but I'm still looking for sponsor. In the next days, as i said, I'll address a bunch of bugs in 2.0.10 series. Thank you all. Greetings. Andrea -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIFJiFMXahCK22/rwRAq3HAJ4+tvL/NDR19cS5BuNGK+MAauM61gCaAgHj SsIaLRKpBahlZKlIa9JPBT4= =r6zq -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: php5-rar
[Please reply to the list, I _do_ read it] 2008/4/27 Deepak Tripathi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, Yes it does contain the PHP 3.01 license but it is now acceptable. check the php-apc package in mirror it also has PHP license 3.01. No it doesn't, it is released under the PHP licence version 3.0, not 3.01; the former it REJECTED the latter is also REJECTED unless the code was written by the PHP Team themselves. Thanks Deepak Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: gcin (updated package, closes RC bug #406036)
On 27/04/2008, Gonéri Le Bouder wrote: You can read more about that at http://wiki.debian.org/RpathIssue That should be fixed... Currently, the only generally accepted use of this feature in Debian is to add non-standard library path (like /usr/lib/package) to libraries that are only intended to be used by the executables or other libraries within the same source package. I think we are in this case. Exactly. Mraw, KiBi. pgpHgTLyDJirw.pgp Description: PGP signature
information required
hello dear My name is sadia and i am student of MS(computer science). i want some information relating to bug #436681 that has been fixed now. i have two problems in checking this bug: Q 1- please tell me how can i install the new package of backuppc_3.0.0- 4.diff.gz on my PC ?? As i have already installed the old version of package backuppc 2.1.2.6 directly through internet but can not install the new version of this package. I have also tried by downloading the new package from this following path http://snapshot.debian.net/archive/2007/08/28/debian/pool/main/b/backuppc/backuppc_3.0.0-4.diff.gz But when i try to install it by giving commands (i.e aptitude install or dpkg -i), it do not install this new package and give error of zero bytes like this. kindly tell me the proper way or command to install this new package. Q2- In which language the code of backuppc packageis written??, is it perl or in some other language?? (as i have found some of the syntax is different from perl) Thanx in Avance!!! bye - Explore your hobbies and interests. Click here to begin.
Re: information required
sadia jameel wrote: hello dear My name is sadia and i am student of MS(computer science). i want some information relating to bug #436681 that has been fixed now. i have two problems in checking this bug: Q 1- please tell me how can i install the new package of backuppc_3.0.0- 4.diff.gz on my PC ?? As i have already installed the old version of package backuppc 2.1.2.6 directly through internet but can not install the new version of this package. I have also tried Hi Sadia; At the risk of spoon feeding you something you should already know, there is a difference between a *.diff.gz and a *.deb file. If you do not already understand these differences, you might be better served if you begin with the debian-user mailing list. This debian-mentors list is not tailored to answer these type of questions. Richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: php5-rar
oh ok ,, i will check with upstream and let you know? On 4/27/08, Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Please reply to the list, I _do_ read it] 2008/4/27 Deepak Tripathi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, Yes it does contain the PHP 3.01 license but it is now acceptable. check the php-apc package in mirror it also has PHP license 3.01. No it doesn't, it is released under the PHP licence version 3.0, not 3.01; the former it REJECTED the latter is also REJECTED unless the code was written by the PHP Team themselves. Thanks Deepak Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Deepak Tripathi E3 71V3 8Y C063 (We Live By Code) http://deepkatripathi.blogspot.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
