Re: RFS: sunpinyin -- An input method engine based on SLM
传说中很牛的拼音输入法，也在opensolaris上用过，当时很奇怪怎么挂在角上的 支持一下 问能否不依赖scim或者iiimf，只通过xim来完成？ 2008/5/2 Kov Chai [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package sunpinyin. * Package name: sunpinyin Version : 1.0-1 Upstream Author : Lei Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] and others * URL : http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/input-method * License : LGPL/CDDL Dual license Programming Lang: C++ Description : An input method engine based on SLM It builds these binary packages: iiimf-le-sunpinyin-chinese - Sunpinyin input method of Chinese Language Engine for iiimf-server scim-sunpinyin - Sunpinyin input method of Chinese Language Engine for SCIM The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 478811 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sunpinyin/ - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sunpinyin/sunpinyin_1.0-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. SunPinyin is an Chinese input method engine based on SLM (Statistical Language Model). . SunPinyin now provides input modules for IIIMF (Internet/Intranet Input Method Framework), SCIM (Smart Common Input Method) and BeCJK. . SunPinyin is the only free Chinese input method engine using a mature SLM of back-off tri-gram language model. The upstream also provides a suite of utilities to train the SLM using raw corpus. Kind regards -- Regards, Kov Chai 2008.05.02 Fri -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIGpT0kt4oayDNJDYRAoqGAJ99lKeDGo/4shKrIS0HuwYTAsfY0ACeP4gb g9Dz3RAsDVY2Rz/oI0hf27o= =JNTp -END PGP SIGNATURE-
RFS: greenwich (updated and adopted package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.2-4 of the package greenwich, which I'm adopting It builds the binary package: greenwich - graphical whois client for GNOME A GNOME application which allows you to perform whois lookups. You enter the whois server to use (or choose from predefined values), type the name of the host you want to find details of; and the full output from the server will be shown. For convenience, output can be easily saved to file. It's just a graphical program for those who hate the shell ;) The package appears to be lintian clean; I've added a lintian override for The upload would fix the ITA bug: 477829 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/greenwich/greenwich_0.8.2-4.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kindly David Paleino -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
RFS: lockrun
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my (very small) package lockrun. * Package name: lockrun Version : 1-1 Upstream Author : Stephen J. Friedl [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.unixwiz.net/tools/lockrun.html * License : Public domain Language: : C Section : admin It builds these binary packages: lockrun- cron job overrun protection utility The lockrun utility serves as a protective wrapper around a standard cron job preventing it from overrunning with any previous invocation. The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 461915 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lockrun - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main - contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lockrun/lockrun_1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Thanks, -- Noah Slater - Bytesexual http://bytesexual.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: lockrun
Noah Slater wrote:
...
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lockrun/lockrun_1-1.dsc
$ dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lockrun/lockrun_1-1.dsc
dget: retrieving
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lockrun/lockrun_1-1.dsc
% Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time
Current
Dload Upload Total SpentLeft
Speed
100 1768 100 17680 0 5471 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--
0
dget: retrieving
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lockrun/lockrun_1.orig.tar.gz
% Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time
Current
Dload Upload Total SpentLeft
Speed
100 2897 100 28970 0 7315 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--
253k
dget: retrieving
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lockrun/lockrun_1-1.diff.gz
% Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time
Current
Dload Upload Total SpentLeft
Speed
100 2537 100 25370 0 2610 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:--
13146
gpg: Signature made Fri 02 May 2008 07:50:49 CDT using RSA key ID 8FBFCFBF
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
dpkg-source: extracting lockrun in lockrun-1
dpkg-source: info: unpacking lockrun_1.orig.tar.gz
dpkg-source: info: applying lockrun_1-1.diff.gz
$ gpg --recv-key 0x8FBFCFBF
gpg: requesting key 8FBFCFBF from hkp server pgp.mit.edu
gpgkeys: key 8FBFCFBF not found on keyserver
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
gpg: Total number processed: 0
Please upload your key to a public keyserver.
Version: 1-1
I don't see any version number in the source code. Please use 0~MMDD
instead (where MMDD is the download date, or if possible, the
modification date of upstream's .c file), just in case upstream decides to
use version numbers at some point, if ever.
debian/rules:
gcc lockrun.c -o lockrun
Please don't do that, at least call gcc with CFLAGS:
gcc $(CFLAGS) lockrun.c -o lockrun
debian/control:
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
also use ${misc:Depends}
Btw, linda is no longer in the archive, you should get rid of the linda
overrides (lintian will complain if you keep them).
The package FTBFS twice in a row with the following message:
/usr/bin/make -f debian/rules reverse-config
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/lockrun-1'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `reverse-config'.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/lockrun-1'
if [ reverse-patches = reverse-patches ]; then rm -f
debian/stamp-patched; fi
patches: debian/patches/command-option.patch
Trying reverse patch debian/patches/command-option.patch at level 1 ...
0 ... 2 ... failure.
make: *** [reverse-patches] Error 1
dpkg-buildpackage: failure: fakeroot debian/rules clean gave error exit
status 2
Please fix those issues.
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Thanks,
Cheers,
--
Atomo64 - Raphael
Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: greenwich (updated and adopted package)
Hi David, David Paleino wrote: The package appears to be lintian clean; I've added a lintian override for You forgot that :) $ licensecheck src/greenwich.pl src/greenwich.pl: GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address) $ grep Version LICENSE Version 2, June 1991 However, in debian/copyright you state that: Files: * Copyright: © 2003-2004, Gavin Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] License: Artistic | GPL-1+ which appears incorrect, and the lintian override is incorrect anyway (the address should be updated). debian/control: Build-Depends-Indep: libgnome2-perl, imagemagick, menu Is the menu dependency really needed? and the imagemagick one? debian/control: debian/rules: You have an incorrect dependency on debhelper: ... dh_installmenu dh_gconf dh_lintian make: dh_lintian: Command not found make: *** [binary-indep] Error 127 pbuilder: Failed autobuilding of package ... dh_lintian was introduced in debhelper (6.0.7), but you have a Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5). Please fix the above mentioned issues (tough there might be more). Kindly David Paleino Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: icecream (updated and adopted package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package icecream. icecream is already in the archive, but has been orphaned. * Package name: icecream Version : 1.3-1 Upstream Author : Gil Megidish [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://icecream.sourceforce.net * License : GPL Section : net It builds these binary packages: icecream - lightweight stream download utility The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 319342, 396892, 396893, 431684 icecream is a non-interactive stream download utility written in Perl. It connects to icecast and shoutcast servers or direct stream URLs, and redirects all fetched content to stdout and/or to media files on your disk. Listen to the stream piping the output to a stdin-capable media player. Save the stream to a named file or split it into different tracks. It is possible to redirect the stream and save it to disk at the same time. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/icecream - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/icecream/icecream_1.3-1.dsc I would be glad if someone would review my package and upload this package for me. Cristian signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: lockrun
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 10:54 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: debian/rules: gcc lockrun.c -o lockrun Please don't do that, at least call gcc with CFLAGS: gcc $(CFLAGS) lockrun.c -o lockrun Use the proper DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE variable too so that the package can be cross-built (and use the cc symlink instead of gcc). ifneq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE),$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE)) CC=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)-gcc else CC=cc endif $(CC) $(CFLAGS) lockrun.c -o lockrun -- Neil Williams = http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: RFS: greenwich (updated and adopted package)
On Fri, 02 May 2008 11:53:22 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: Hi David, Hi Raphael, David Paleino wrote: The package appears to be lintian clean; I've added a lintian override for You forgot that :) $ licensecheck src/greenwich.pl src/greenwich.pl: GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address) $ grep Version LICENSE Version 2, June 1991 Oops. I was basing my debian/copyright on the Perl license -- it seemed like greenwich used that. Fixed, thanks. debian/control: Build-Depends-Indep: libgnome2-perl, imagemagick, menu Is the menu dependency really needed? and the imagemagick one? No, indeed. Fixed! debian/control: debian/rules: You have an incorrect dependency on debhelper: ... dh_installmenu dh_gconf dh_lintian make: dh_lintian: Command not found make: *** [binary-indep] Error 127 pbuilder: Failed autobuilding of package ... dh_lintian was introduced in debhelper (6.0.7), but you have a Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5). Uh, right. Thanks for spotting this! However, I remember lintian warning about wrong (i.e. debhelper-script-needs-versioned-build-depends) debhelper dependency. Bug and patch filed (see #479088) :) (btw, now that I've removed debian/lintian-overrides, I removed dh_lintian as well, so dh = 5 seems just fine to me.) Please fix the above mentioned issues (tough there might be more). It seems like it builds fine also on a sid chroot now (pdebuilder --pbuilder cowbuilder) Updated package at usual URI: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/greenwich/greenwich_0.8.2-4.dsc Thanks, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: greenwich (updated and adopted package)
David Paleino wrote: Updated package at usual URI: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/greenwich/greenwich_0.8.2-4.dsc debian/rules: dh_installexamples ... dh_strip ... dh_shlibdeps you don't need them, do you? :) Btw, don't you think there's a better place for the contents of debian/README.Debian? Thanks, David Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: greenwich (updated and adopted package)
On Fri, 02 May 2008 12:57:26 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: debian/rules: dh_installexamples ... dh_strip ... dh_shlibdeps you don't need them, do you? :) Hm, right :) Btw, don't you think there's a better place for the contents of debian/README.Debian? I've not written that, it's from the old maintainer. I believe it could go in NEWS, but I'm open to any suggestion! Thanks for reviewing, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Request for comments (before I file a RFS)
NanoXML is a (actually more than one) small XML parser for Java. Provides the Java packages net.n3.nanoxml.*, net.n3.nanoxml.sax.* and nanoxml.* in different jars. I have packaged it since it is a dependency for Knoplerfish (an OSGI implementation that I hope to package for Debian) I have a few questions I hope someone can answer: Should I install the examples? In that case, should they be in doc? Should I run the tests during the build? Some small xml files has no license statement. Does that mean that I remove them? (If you have time to take a look at the package:) Are there things in it that I should improve? Have I made any mistakes? This is the first Debian package I have made from scratch, so I would appreciate the feedback. Is now the time to start looking for a sponsor? The package (everything in a tarball) can be downloaded from http://folk.ntnu.no/kvilhaug/debian/nanoxml.tar.gz Debian-bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=478727 Source: libnanoxml-java Binary: libnanoxml-java, libnanoxml-java-doc License: This software is provided 'as-is', without any express or implied warranty. In no event will the authors be held liable for any damages arising from the use of this software. Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any purpose, including commercial applications, and to alter it and redistribute it freely, subject to the following restrictions: 1. The origin of this software must not be misrepresented; you must not claim that you wrote the original software. If you use this software in a product, an acknowledgment in the product documentation would be appreciated but is not required. 2. Altered source versions must be plainly marked as such, and must not be misrepresented as being the original software. 3. This notice may not be removed or altered from any source distribution. -- Sincerly Sveinung Many have imagined republics and principalities which have never been seen or known to exist in reality; for how we live is so far removed from how we ought to live, that he who abandons what is done for what ought to be done, will rather bring about his own ruin than his preservation. (quote Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: greenwich (updated and adopted package)
David Paleino wrote: On Fri, 02 May 2008 12:57:26 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: Btw, don't you think there's a better place for the contents of debian/README.Debian? I've not written that, it's from the old maintainer. I believe it could go in NEWS, but I'm open to any suggestion! NEWS is not for that kind of stuff. IMHO you could simply install it as usr/share/doc/greenwich/TODO (upstream doesn't ship one anyway, and it isn't a Debian TODO). Thanks for reviewing, David Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: greenwich (updated and adopted package)
On Fri, 02 May 2008 13:25:48 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: David Paleino wrote: On Fri, 02 May 2008 12:57:26 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: Btw, don't you think there's a better place for the contents of debian/README.Debian? I've not written that, it's from the old maintainer. I believe it could go in NEWS, but I'm open to any suggestion! NEWS is not for that kind of stuff. IMHO you could simply install it as usr/share/doc/greenwich/TODO (upstream doesn't ship one anyway, and it isn't a Debian TODO). Good point, I've dropped it completely. Usual URI: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/greenwich/greenwich_0.8.2-4.dsc Thanks, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Request for comments (before I file a RFS)
Hi Sveinung, Here's some quick feedback but bear in mind that IANADD or any other two letter acronym. On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 07:46:04PM +0200, Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik wrote [edited]: I have a few questions I hope someone can answer: Should I install the examples? In that case, should they be in doc? Yes, in doc/examples. Use dh_installexamples. Should I run the tests during the build? Yes, assuming the tests don't take too long to run. (If you have time to take a look at the package:) Are there things in it that I should improve? Have I made any mistakes? This is the first lintian gives several warnings, please fix them. The one-line synopsis should not be capitalised and not end with a period. The current standards version is 3.7.3 but your package states 3.7.2. See /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz Cheers, Serafeim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: lure-of-the-temptress - an ScummVM game
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package lure-of-the-temptress. The upload would fix ITP: #478543 The package is lintian clean. * Package name : lure-of-the-temptress Version: 1.1~dfsg-1 Upstream Author: Revolution Software Ltd. * URL: http://www.revolution.co.uk/_display.php?id=10 Download page : http://www.scummvm.org/downloads.php * License: see below (the same with beneath-a-steel-sky) Programing Language: NULL (game data only) Section: games It builds these packages: lure-of-the-temptress - a quirky and entertaining adventure game lure-of-the-temptress-de - a quirky and entertaining adventure game - - German version lure-of-the-temptress-es - a quirky and entertaining adventure game - - Spanish version lure-of-the-temptress-fr - a quirky and entertaining adventure game - - French version lure-of-the-temptress-it - a quirky and entertaining adventure game - - Italian version Long description: Lure of the Temptress is a fantasy point-and-click adventure game, originally published for ST, Amiga and PC. . You take on the role of Diermot, an young peasant. You were most recently employed as a beater for the king's hunting party. One night, the king receives a note from a bedraggled messenger, requesting the king's services to help stamp out a rebellion led by a young and beautiful apprentice sorceress named Selena in the remote village of Turnvale. As the king's men depart on their horses to ride to the rescue, your pony follows them, and you are unwittingly dragged along to the battle. When the party arrives at Turnvale, you are confronted not by an ordinary peasant uprising, but rather by a band of fierce, inhuman hired mercenaries - the Skorl. The king's men are defeated and the king is killed. In the process, you are flung from your mount and winds up on the ground unconscious. The Skorl take you prisoner, tossing you into the local dungeon. So begins the quest to rid Turnvale of the Skorl menace, and defeat the enchantress. . Note that this package only contains game-data. The game engine is provided by ScummVM. . This package provides a lure.dat file for ScummVM 0.11.1. If your ScummVM is newer, you have to replace /usr/share/scummvm/lure-of-the-temptress/lure.dat with a newer one from http://www.scummvm.org/downloads.php. Full text of license: == Lure of the Temptress, PC DOS version (C) Revolution Software Ltd 1992- - - --- 1) You may distribute this game for free on any medium, provided this license and all associated copyright notices and disclaimers are left intact. 2) You may charge a reasonable copying fee for this archive, and may distribute it in aggregate as part of a larger possibly commercial software distribution (such as a Linux distribution or magazine coverdisk). You must provide proper attribution and ensure this license and all associated copyright notices, and disclaimers are left intact. 3) You may not charge a fee for the game itself. This includes reselling the game as an individual item. 4) You may modify the game as you wish. You may also distribute modified versions under the terms set forth in this license, but with the additional requirement that the work is marked with a prominent notice which states that it is a modified version. 5) All game content is (C) Revolution Software Ltd. 6) THE GAMEDATA IN THIS ARCHIVE IS PROVIDED AS IS AND WITHOUT ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING AND NOT LIMITED TO ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. == The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lure-of-the-temptress/lure-of-the-temptress_1.1~dfsg-1.dsc If you think those game data is not source and should be put to non-free, please see http://bugs.debian.org/241431 , where an DD explains why it is free. About the DFSG tarball: I removed all lure.exe in original zip files, because they are executable binaries without source code. About lure.dat: The lure.dat is created from (hardcoded) data of the original executable of Lure of the Temptress (lure.exe). It is game data, not an executable. Source code to make lure.dat is included in ScummVM. I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Wen-Yen Chuang (caleb) - -- My GPG key is signed by Debian Developer Masayuki Hatta. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIG4/PdEpXpumNYVkRAk/wAJ0XUwf1rDxiFt7bdVIe+8AjgbiyzgCfRerG Y2ybma8a3Q1u1MFjobI1rFc= =Bc4q -END PGP
