Re: [Fwd: Re: [jack-mixer]bin/sh: no: command not found]]
Grammostola Rosea wrote: Hi, I got this reply back from upstream author. I know close to nothing about programming, so I'm looking for a bit assistance here. Thanks. \r Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [jack-mixer]bin/sh: no: command not found] From: Nedko Arnaudov ne...@arnaudov.name Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 09:00:52 +0300 To: Grammostola Rosea rosea.grammost...@gmail.com To: Grammostola Rosea rosea.grammost...@gmail.com Grammostola Rosea rosea.grammost...@gmail.com writes: From: Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org Subject: Re: [jack-mixer]bin/sh: no: command not found To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:37:24 +0100 Resent-From: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:26:14 +0200 Grammostola Rosea rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote: Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: Grammostola Rosea wrote: GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE= no --makefile-install-rule ^ This space should be removed. Where can I find this line? I use cdbs. \r CDBS handles GCONF properly but this line is executed long before CDBS gets any chance to use the debhelper gconf support - it looks like upstream as it is still being called by make. Yes, gconf is called by make. The suse packager requested the --disable-schemas-install configure option and this made it for him. If you have better suggestion, do it. BTW: this was the error I got: make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/jack-mixer-6' test -z /usr/share/jack_mixer || /bin/mkdir -p /tmp/buildd/jack-mixer-6/debian/jack-mixer//usr/share/jack_mixer /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'abspeak.py' '/tmp/buildd/jack-mixer-6/debian/jack-mixer//usr/share/jack_mixer/abspeak.py' /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'channel.py' '/tmp/buildd/jack-mixer-6/debian/jack-mixer//usr/share/jack_mixer/channel.py' /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'gui.py' '/tmp/buildd/jack-mixer-6/debian/jack-mixer//usr/share/jack_mixer/gui.py' /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'meter.py' '/tmp/buildd/jack-mixer-6/debian/jack-mixer//usr/share/jack_mixer/meter.py' /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'scale.py' '/tmp/buildd/jack-mixer-6/debian/jack-mixer//usr/share/jack_mixer/scale.py' /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'serialization.py' '/tmp/buildd/jack-mixer-6/debian/jack-mixer//usr/share/jack_mixer/serialization.py' /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'serialization_xml.py' '/tmp/buildd/jack-mixer-6/debian/jack-mixer//usr/share/jack_mixer/serialization_xml.py' /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'slider.py' '/tmp/buildd/jack-mixer-6/debian/jack-mixer//usr/share/jack_mixer/slider.py' /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'jack_mixer.glade' '/tmp/buildd/jack-mixer-6/debian/jack-mixer//usr/share/jack_mixer/jack_mixer.glade' test -z /etc/gconf/schemas || /bin/mkdir -p /tmp/buildd/jack-mixer-6/debian/jack-mixer//etc/gconf/schemas /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'jack_mixer.schemas' '/tmp/buildd/jack-mixer-6/debian/jack-mixer//etc/gconf/schemas/jack_mixer.schemas' /usr/bin/make install-data-hook make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/jack-mixer-6' GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE= no --makefile-install-rule ./jack_mixer.schemas /bin/sh: no: command not found make[3]: *** [install-data-hook] Error 127 make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/jack-mixer-6' make[2]: *** [install-data-am] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/jack-mixer-6' make[1]: *** [install-am] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/jack-mixer-6' make: *** [common-install-impl] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error exit status 2 E: Failed autobuilding of package -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: screenruler (updated package) (ruby)
Uhm... Yes, perhaps an epoch would be more adequate. Whoever uploads the package, feel free to change the version to 1:0.8.9.1+bzr24-1 if you prefer that (or ask me to change it). -- Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals (RainCT) Ubuntu Developer. Debian Contributor. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: out of date on mips: siege (from 2.66-2)
* Tristan Greaves [Sat, 04 Apr 2009 09:53:53 +0100]: Hi all, Could someone please explain the above Excuse for me? (I understand the _what_ but not the _why_ in this instance). https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=siege My package has successfully built on the other architectures, but the process does not seem to have run on mips. There are no click-through logs to look at in order to see if there was a specific problem here, or whether the build just has not kicked off for some reason. Sometimes a build gets lost or something similar. I’ve scheduled a rebuild. The correct contact address would be debian-wb-t...@lists.d.o. Cheers, -- - Are you sure we're good? - Always. -- Rory and Lorelai -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Fwd: Re: [jack-mixer]bin/sh: no: command not found]]
Hi, I got this reply back from upstream author. I know close to nothing about programming, so I'm looking for a bit assistance here. Thanks. \r ---BeginMessage--- Grammostola Rosea rosea.grammost...@gmail.com writes: From: Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org Subject: Re: [jack-mixer]bin/sh: no: command not found To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:37:24 +0100 Resent-From: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:26:14 +0200 Grammostola Rosea rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote: Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: Grammostola Rosea wrote: GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE= no --makefile-install-rule ^ This space should be removed. Where can I find this line? I use cdbs. \r CDBS handles GCONF properly but this line is executed long before CDBS gets any chance to use the debhelper gconf support - it looks like upstream as it is still being called by make. Yes, gconf is called by make. The suse packager requested the --disable-schemas-install configure option and this made it for him. If you have better suggestion, do it. -- Nedko Arnaudov GnuPG KeyID: DE1716B0 pgpufsdMiH0VC.pgp Description: PGP signature ---End Message---
RFS: wbar (3rd try)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package wbar. * Package name: wbar Version : 1.3.3+dfsg1-1 Upstream Author : Rodolfo Granata warlock...@gmail.com * URL : http://code.google.com/p/wbar/ * License : GPL Section : x11 It builds these binary packages: wbar - a light and fast launch bar The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 519993 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wbar - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wbar/wbar_1.3.3+dfsg1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, -- Krzysztof Burghardt krzysz...@burghardt.pl http://www.burghardt.pl/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: nc6 (updated package)
Hello! Is there any reason for nc6 anymore? The default netcat has been renamed to netcat-traditional and the alternative is netcat-openbsd (which is protocol independent and thus does ipv6) It seems to me there's no need for nc6 anymore now that a proper protocol-independent version exists? Please enlighten me on what I've missed... -- Regards, Andreas Henriksson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: kita2
On 2009-03-21, Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp wrote: On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:42:43 +0900 Junichi Uekawa dan...@netfort.gr.jp wrote: So instead of adding a package to be removed soon after it is clear of NEW, I suggest not adding it at all. So, it's been two weeks, is there a working kde4? How's about korundum4 and kita packages' status? Any progress? So now, when currently running mirror push is done, you have everything available in unstable. /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
RFS: siege (updated package, diffs majorly slimmed down) - attempt 2
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.68b7-1 of my package siege. It builds these binary packages: siege - HTTP regression testing and benchmarking utility The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/siege - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/siege/siege_2.68b7-1.dsc This version incorporates the latest upstream, where I have pushed the previous batch of patches to. The result is that we are now fully lintian clean (including under pedantic mode) and we no longer need to use quilt at all to fix any problems! changelog: siege (2.68b7-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. * debian/control - Builds-Depends: automake removed (no need to invoke on build now). quilt removed (no patches remain). * debian/patches - Removed autotools_upgrade.patch (Upstream has upgraded automake). - Removed etc_siegerc.patch (Upstream has included). - Removed fix_cl_arguments.patch (Upstream fixed bug differently). - Removed fix_http_headers.patch (Upstream has included). - Removed fix_man_pages.patch (Upstream has included). * Fixed lintian warning: ancient-libtool-usage. -- Tristan Greaves tris...@extricate.org Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:50:13 +0100 I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Tristan Greaves -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [Fwd: Re: [jack-mixer]bin/sh: no: command not found]]
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:09:50PM +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote: make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/jack-mixer-6' GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE= no --makefile-install-rule ./jack_mixer.schemas ^^ It's still that space right there. make is trying to call the command 'no', instead of assigning the value to the variable GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE. -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
fsprotect
Dear mentors, About 2 weeks ago I sent an RFS for a debian-native package/program called fsprotect (available in mentors). I just show that KDE 4.2 is entering unstable. Can someone please consider sponsoring fsprotect? I re-send this mail as an urgent request. Using fsprotect all of us (well.. you.. I use it already :-) will be able to test the KDE 3.5 - KDE 4.2 transition without risking anything at all. You'll only have to add fsprotect= as a kernel parameter and change a simple configuration file and you'll then be able to try the 3-4 transition as many times as you want. After each reboot the system will be restored to its original state and thus we'll all be able to debug KDE 4.2 upgrade before actually doing it. (assuming that fsprotect will work as expected) I suggest that you consider this as a tool (best option?) for experimenting in this big transition and push it to unstable. Thanks in advance, Harhalakis Stefanos p.s. I'm cross-posting this to pkg-kde-talk, since you may want to try this even using the package from mentors (which is in a good shape). p.s.2. I'm only subscribed to debian-mentors so please CC me as needed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [Fwd: Re: [jack-mixer]bin/sh: no: command not found]]
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:09:50PM +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote: make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/jack-mixer-6' GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE= no --makefile-install-rule ./jack_mixer.schemas ^^ It's still that space right there. make is trying to call the command 'no', instead of assigning the value to the variable GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE. Thanks for comments. Which file should I look at? \r -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: siege (updated package, diffs majorly slimmed down) - attempt 2
Hi! Tristan Greaves schrieb: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.68b7-1 of my package siege. I took a quick look at your package. Some comments bellow: - You build-depend on cdbs, but you don't use it? - Your debian/rules has a lot of commented dh_foo calls which should be removed - Why do you build-depend on ed? And why on autotools-dev? - You package a beta version; a specific reason for that? - Especially since your watch file only scans the real versions? Rest seems fine to me. Best regards, Alexander signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [Fwd: Re: [jack-mixer]bin/sh: no: command not found]]
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 09:44:20PM +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote: It's still that space right there. make is trying to call the command 'no', instead of assigning the value to the variable GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE. Thanks for comments. Which file should I look at? Personally I would unpack the upstream source somwhere convenient and grep it for 'GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE' to see if that error is in there. If it is, blame upstream. (of course, my experience is limited and a DD may have a different theory.) -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [Fwd: Re: [jack-mixer]bin/sh: no: command not found]]
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 09:44:20PM +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote: It's still that space right there. make is trying to call the command 'no', instead of assigning the value to the variable GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE. Thanks for comments. Which file should I look at? Personally I would unpack the upstream source somwhere convenient and grep it for 'GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE' to see if that error is in there. If it is, blame upstream. (of course, my experience is limited and a DD may have a different theory.) In Makefile.am I find if GCONF_SCHEMAS_INSTALL install-data-hook: GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=$(GCONF_SCHEMA_CONFIG_SOURCE) $(GCONFTOOL) --makefile-install-rule $(srcdir)/$(schema_DATA) uninstall-hook: GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=$(GCONF_SCHEMA_CONFIG_SOURCE) $(GCONFTOOL) --makefile-uninstall-rule $(srcdir)/$(schema_DATA) rm -vf $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/jack_mixer endif In Makefile.in : install-exec-hook: ln -vfs jack_mixer.py $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/jack_mixer @gconf_schemas_install_t...@install-data-hook: @GCONF_SCHEMAS_INSTALL_TRUE@ GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=$(GCONF_SCHEMA_CONFIG_SOURCE) $(GCONFTOOL) --makefile-install-rule $(srcdir)/$(schema_DATA) @gconf_schemas_install_t...@uninstall-hook: @GCONF_SCHEMAS_INSTALL_TRUE@ GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=$(GCONF_SCHEMA_CONFIG_SOURCE) $(GCONFTOOL) --makefile-uninstall-rule $(srcdir)/$(schema_DATA) @GCONF_SCHEMAS_INSTALL_TRUE@rm -vf $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/jack_mixer # Tell versions [3.59,3.63) of GNU make to not export all variables. # Otherwise a system limit (for SysV at least) may be exceeded. .NOEXPORT: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [Fwd: Re: [jack-mixer]bin/sh: no: command not found]]
Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk writes: On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:09:50PM +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote: make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/jack-mixer-6' GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE= no --makefile-install-rule ./jack_mixer.schemas ^^ It's still that space right there. make is trying to call the command 'no', instead of assigning the value to the variable GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE. From the Make Manual: , | 6.5 Setting Variables | | To set a variable from the makefile, write a line starting with the | variable name followed by ‘=’ or ‘:=’. Whatever follows the ‘=’ or | ‘:=’ on the line becomes the value. For example, | |objects = main.o foo.o bar.o utils.o | | defines a variable named objects. Whitespace around the variable name | and immediately after the ‘=’ is ignored. ` So the space should not hurt. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [Fwd: Re: [jack-mixer]bin/sh: no: command not found]]
Matthias Julius wrote: Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk writes: On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:09:50PM +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote: make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/jack-mixer-6' GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE= no --makefile-install-rule ./jack_mixer.schemas ^^ It's still that space right there. make is trying to call the command 'no', instead of assigning the value to the variable GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE. From the Make Manual: , | 6.5 Setting Variables | | To set a variable from the makefile, write a line starting with the | variable name followed by ‘=’ or ‘:=’. Whatever follows the ‘=’ or | ‘:=’ on the line becomes the value. For example, | |objects = main.o foo.o bar.o utils.o | | defines a variable named objects. Whitespace around the variable name | and immediately after the ‘=’ is ignored. ` So the space should not hurt. Thanks. Ok, so what can be the problem instead? The upstream author says Yes, gconf is called by make. The suse packager requested the --disable-schemas-install configure option and this made it for him. If you have better suggestion, do it. Don't know if it is related... \r -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
problem sign .changes
Hello mentors, how-to sign .dsc and .changes files? I tried $ debsing -sgpg file.changes and have error: secret key not available I already generated my key by $gpg --gen-key command. regards mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
