Re: RFS: pyspi (NMU - RC bug fix)
Charles Plessy wrote: [...] If he does not show interest for his package, then unless you want to adopt it, I would rather recommend that you file a request for removal. If for more than one year there was no manpower to take care of this package (and its reverse dependancy), then NMUing it will only have the effect of drawing some time of another developper at the next RC bug… I'll track its status, but am uploading the NMU in the meanwhile. Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer www.debian.org - get.debian.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
rules file and missing dh_shlibdeps
Hi, during generating deb package i get errors like this: dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: no dependency information found for . And my question is: can i remove from rules file dh_shlibdeps line, with out any consequences ?? If not what problems I can encounter in the future. Best Regards Adrian
Re: rules file and missing dh_shlibdeps
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:26:04AM +0200, Adrian Stel wrote: And my question is: can i remove from rules file dh_shlibdeps line, with out any consequences ?? If not what problems I can encounter in the future. If your package is architecture dependent, you should keep the call to sh_libdeps in case the upstream situation ever changes. If it's Arch: any, you can safely remove the call. -- Jonathan Wiltshire 1024D: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: rules file and missing dh_shlibdeps
On 2009-07-10, Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk wrote: --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:26:04AM +0200, Adrian Stel wrote: And my question is: can i remove from rules file dh_shlibdeps line, with = out any consequences ?? If not what problems I can encounter in the future. If your package is architecture dependent, you should keep the call to sh_libdeps in case the upstream situation ever changes. If it's Arch: any, you can safely remove the call. Wrong. /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: rules file and missing dh_shlibdeps
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:06:52AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote: Wrong. I'm open to corrections, but that's really not helpful. -- Jonathan Wiltshire 1024D: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: rules file and missing dh_shlibdeps
On Friday 10,July,2009 05:58 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: If your package is architecture dependent, you should keep the call to sh_libdeps in case the upstream situation ever changes. If it's Arch: any, you can safely remove the call. 'Arch: any' means architecture dependent. Perhaps you meant 'Arch: all'? -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: rules file and missing dh_shlibdeps
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 06:20:48PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote: On Friday 10,July,2009 05:58 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: If your package is architecture dependent, you should keep the call to sh_libdeps in case the upstream situation ever changes. If it's Arch: any, you can safely remove the call. 'Arch: any' means architecture dependent. Perhaps you meant 'Arch: all'? Yes; I doubt it's the last time I'll make that mistake. Thanks. -- Jonathan Wiltshire 1024D: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
RFS: plasma-widget-yawp (second attempt)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package plasma-widget-yawp. * Package name: plasma-widget-yawp Version : 0.2.3-1 Upstream Author : Pierpaolo Vittorini pvit...@users.sourceforge.net, Marián Kyral ma...@users.sourceforge.net, Ezequiel Aguerre ezeague...@users.sourceforge.net, Ruan Strydom y...@users.sourceforge.net * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/yawp * License : GPL2 Section : kde It builds these binary packages: plasma-widget-yawp - Yet Another Weather Plasmoid fetches weather forecasts for you The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 529815 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/plasma-widget-yawp - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/plasma-widget-yawp/plasma-widget-yawp_0.2.3-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Kai Wasserbäch -- Kai Wasserbäch (Kai Wasserbaech) E-Mail: deb...@carbon-project.org Jabber (debianforum.de): Drizzt URL: http://wiki.debianforum.de/Drizzt_Do%27Urden GnuPG: 0xE1DE59D2 0600 96CE F3C8 E733 E5B6 1587 A309 D76C E1DE 59D2 (http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de/pks/lookup?search=0xE1DE59D2fingerprint=onhash=onop=vindex) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
