Re: RFS: sweethome3d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dne Wed, 3 Mar 2010 09:46:35 +0100 Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org napsal(a): http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani/debian/freehep-xml_2.1.2+dfsg1-2.dsc http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani/debian/freehep-graphicsio-svg_2.1.1-1.dsc Okay, I'm probably doing something wrong here, but it fails to build: dh_testroot You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD! make: *** [maven-sanity-check] Error 1 dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules clean gave error exit status 2 Full pbuilder log: http://tmp.cihar.com/freehep-xml_2.1.2+dfsg1-2_amd64.build The debian/rules seem to set JAVA_HOME := /usr/lib/jvm/default-java, which is non existing on my system. Okay, the bug is that default-jdk should be in Build-Depends and not in Build-Depends-Indep, because it is required for clean. - -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuOJE8ACgkQ3DVS6DbnVgTdmQCdGbnt+ADHwNMw7d/jjn662oZy SsMAniLGvV0d583sRuQqVfKPE+PBbJuF =E9+/ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: RFS: sweethome3d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dne Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:01:36 +0100 Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com napsal(a): On 03/01/2010 08:51 AM, Michal Čihař wrote: The package is lintian clean and needs freehep-xml and freehep-graphicsio-svg which are in NEW. For upload man would need those packages to test and build, can you please provide them somewhere? http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani/debian/freehep-xml_2.1.2+dfsg1-2.dsc http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani/debian/freehep-graphicsio-svg_2.1.1-1.dsc Okay, I'm probably doing something wrong here, but it fails to build: dh_testroot You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD! make: *** [maven-sanity-check] Error 1 dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules clean gave error exit status 2 Full pbuilder log: http://tmp.cihar.com/freehep-xml_2.1.2+dfsg1-2_amd64.build The debian/rules seem to set JAVA_HOME := /usr/lib/jvm/default-java, which is non existing on my system. - -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuOIesACgkQ3DVS6DbnVgSA5ACbBfeXRaWgdKNC425IawWUGo7P 2ssAn1Xbt6Pnfh+ZxLBuqkG0wlH4wLaC =8jHg -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: RFS: sweethome3d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/03/2010 09:56 AM, Michal Čihař wrote: Okay, I'm probably doing something wrong here, but it fails to build: dh_testroot You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD! make: *** [maven-sanity-check] Error 1 dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules clean gave error exit status 2 Full pbuilder log: http://tmp.cihar.com/freehep-xml_2.1.2+dfsg1-2_amd64.build The debian/rules seem to set JAVA_HOME := /usr/lib/jvm/default-java, which is non existing on my system. Okay, the bug is that default-jdk should be in Build-Depends and not in Build-Depends-Indep, because it is required for clean. It seems you're not satisfying build dependencies (d-bp with -d option?). /usr/lib/jvm/default-java is included in default-jre-headless and default-jdk is a builddep that depends on default-jre that depends on default-jre-headless. default-jdk default-jre default-jre-headless All freehep-* packages build fine in a chroot. Sweethome3d too. Cheers, Gabriele -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuOQ3EACgkQp3cdCbVcnCsHzwCfT2c/j92f3QANqUUCp7Sf8e+r q1MAn3ykC80UfGRvrMS9nZb+TcrpN231 =7HBu -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b8e437e.8010...@gmail.com
Re: RFS: recoverjpeg (updated package)
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:09:12PM -0600, William Vera wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0-1 of my package recoverjpeg. It builds these binary packages: recoverjpeg - tool to recover JPEG images from a filesystem image Which features does it bring compared to testdisk/photorec which recover many more types of files ? BTW, testdisk/photorec is in the admin section, maybe this section would more suitable than graphics for recoverjpeg as well ? - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/recoverjpeg/recoverjpeg_2.0-1.dsc I guess the homepage should be http://www.rfc1149.net/devel/recoverjpeg instead (though it is in french only). -- Simon Paillard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100303134258.gb6...@dedibox.ebzao.info
Re: RFS: otf-ipaexfont (NEW)
Hi, On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 07:14:32 +0100 Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote: I haven't followed this very closely but is it OK to upload the fixed package now? I can do it (I guess that the previous pointer to the .dsc file is the right one) but prefer asking before doing it. I've improved the points that Rogério previously pointed out. Please upload it if you can, also previous one (otf-ipafont). http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/otf-ipaexfont/otf-ipaexfont_00101-1.dsc http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/otf-ipafont/otf-ipafont_00302-1.dsc # and... I've fixed _all_ lintian indicates for packages I maintain :) -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/iijmio-mail.jp http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane pgp2hhDPVT5w4.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: recoverjpeg (updated package)
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Simon Paillard simon.paill...@resel.enst-bretagne.fr wrote: I guess the homepage should be http://www.rfc1149.net/devel/recoverjpeg instead (though it is in french only). No it is in English ;) http://www.rfc1149.net/language -- Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/bf0c3b3f1003030546g36368f73uc7c49d7a37735...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: sweethome3d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dne Wed, 03 Mar 2010 12:09:50 +0100 Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com napsal(a): On 03/03/2010 09:56 AM, Michal Čihař wrote: Okay, the bug is that default-jdk should be in Build-Depends and not in Build-Depends-Indep, because it is required for clean. It seems you're not satisfying build dependencies (d-bp with -d option?). /usr/lib/jvm/default-java is included in default-jre-headless and default-jdk is a builddep that depends on default-jre that depends on default-jre-headless. No, please read: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-sourcebinarydeps The problem is that default-jdk is listed in Build-Depends-Indep, while it should be in Build-Depends because it is also required for clean target of debian/rules. - -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuOZqYACgkQ3DVS6DbnVgQZhgCeL2f/4TGAH5lGQDMzTywQzXua +R4An1nIzTZgv1nUwzF1ZXkymonkoPdg =Pcna -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: RFS: recoverjpeg (updated package)
Hello On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Simon Paillard simon.paill...@resel.enst-bretagne.fr wrote: On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:09:12PM -0600, William Vera wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0-1 of my package recoverjpeg. It builds these binary packages: recoverjpeg - tool to recover JPEG images from a filesystem image Which features does it bring compared to testdisk/photorec which recover many more types of files ? recoverjpeg just looks for a jpeg (now mov files) structure into the file system and photorec and testdisk appears be a more complete suite for recover files, is why recoverjpeg is a little faster. Each of these programs are for different needs, I think it's always nice to have several options. BTW, testdisk/photorec is in the admin section, maybe this section would more suitable than graphics for recoverjpeg as well ? - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/recoverjpeg/recoverjpeg_2.0-1.dsc I guess the homepage should be http://www.rfc1149.net/devel/recoverjpeg instead (though it is in french only). Done (is in English) -- Simon Paillard Regards! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100303134258.gb6...@dedibox.ebzao.info -- William Vera bi...@billy.com.mx PGP Key: 1024D/F5CC22A4 Fingerprint: 3E73 FA1F 5C57 6005 0439 4D75 1FD2 BF96 F5CC 22A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/b3e93d821003030600j4120387ew13c2b2e897829...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: sweethome3d
Hi Dne Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:56:23 +0100 Giovanni Mascellani mascell...@poisson.phc.unipi.it napsal(a): On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 14:39:50 +0100, Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org wrote: No, please read: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-sourcebinarydeps The problem is that default-jdk is listed in Build-Depends-Indep, while it should be in Build-Depends because it is also required for clean target of debian/rules. I'm not sure: my packages build-depend on maven-debian-helper, which in turn depends on openjdk-6-jre | java2-runtime. Right now, I have no possibility But maven-debian-helper does not depend default-jdk and you set JAVA_HOME to path provided by default-jdk. And you call maven in clean rule, at which time Build-Depends-Indep does not have to be provided, so it is missing and maven fails. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: sweethome3d
Hi. On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:56:23 +0100, Giovanni Mascellani mascell...@poisson.phc.unipi.it wrote: On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 14:39:50 +0100, Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org wrote: No, please read: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-sourcebinarydeps The problem is that default-jdk is listed in Build-Depends-Indep, while it should be in Build-Depends because it is also required for clean target of debian/rules. I'm not sure: my packages build-depend on maven-debian-helper, which in turn depends on openjdk-6-jre | java2-runtime. Right now, I have no possibility I'm sorry, I sent the email before I finished in error. Right now, I have no possibility to check the build, I'll try to compile again as soon as I come back on my laptop. Thanks, Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani mascell...@poisson.phc.unipi.it Pisa, Italy Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani Jabber: g.mascell...@jabber.org / giova...@elabor.homelinux.org GPG: 0x5F1FBF70 (FP: 1EB6 3D43 E201 4DDF 67BD 003F FCB0 BB5C 5F1F BF70) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/dc874cc0b3fcb5a87c54931f6e016...@poisson.phc.unipi.it
Re: RFS: sweethome3d
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 14:39:50 +0100, Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org wrote: No, please read: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-sourcebinarydeps The problem is that default-jdk is listed in Build-Depends-Indep, while it should be in Build-Depends because it is also required for clean target of debian/rules. I'm not sure: my packages build-depend on maven-debian-helper, which in turn depends on openjdk-6-jre | java2-runtime. Right now, I have no possibility -- Giovanni Mascellani mascell...@poisson.phc.unipi.it Pisa, Italy Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani Jabber: g.mascell...@jabber.org / giova...@elabor.homelinux.org GPG: 0x5F1FBF70 (FP: 1EB6 3D43 E201 4DDF 67BD 003F FCB0 BB5C 5F1F BF70) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/7237b581c2c2f8db8c0b1ddf0c184...@poisson.phc.unipi.it
RFS: fpm2 (updated package)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.78-1 of my package fpm2. (Programming language: C) It builds the binary package: fpm2 The package is lintian clean. The package fixes a wishlist bug (see below). fpm2 (0.78-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release - gray out toolbar buttons and menu entries automatically (Closes: #570596) * Update debian/copyright * Bump Standards-Version to 3.8.4 Description: a password manager with GTK+ 2.x GUI Figaro's Password Manager 2 (FPM2) is a program that allows you to securely store the passwords. Passwords are encrypted with the AES-256 algorithm. . If the password is for a web site, FPM2 can keep track of the URLs of your login screens and can automatically launch your browser. In this capacity, FPM2 acts as a kind of bookmark manager. You can teach FPM2 to launch other applications, and optionally pass hostnames, usernames or passwords to the command line. . FPM2 also has a password generator that can choose passwords for you. It allows you to determine how long the password should be, and what types of characters (lower case, upper case, numbers and symbols) should be used. You can even have it avoid ambiguous characters such as a capital O or the number zero. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fpm2/fpm2_0.78-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. :-) Kind regards Wen-Yen Chuang - -- My GPG key is signed by Debian Developer Masayuki Hatta. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuOiPoACgkQdEpXpumNYVngbQCeOdFOrD1EQjAcNDAeG8hd3L1U Q7oAn288eMcOClcOax2yIjDZ+IOPxisF =SthB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b8e88fa.1020...@calno.com
RFS: ncmpcpp (updated package)
Hello, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.2 of my package ncmpcpp [0] (currently uploaded version is 0.4.1). It builds this binary package: ncmpcpp - ncurses-based client for the Music Player Daemon (MPD) The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 566162 [1], 553382 [2] The package can be found here: - URL: http://debian.fensalir.fr/ncmpcpp/ - dget http://debian.fensalir.fr/ncmpcpp/ncmpcpp_0.5.2-1.dsc Thanks, Regards, [0] http://unkart.ovh.org/ncmpcpp/ [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=566162 [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=553382 -- Damien Leone damien.le...@fensalir.fr Web: http://dleone.fensalir.fr/ GPG: 0x82EB4DDF signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: ncmpcpp (updated package)
Damien Leone writes: Hello, Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.2 of my package ncmpcpp [0] (currently uploaded version is 0.4.1). It builds this binary package: ncmpcpp - ncurses-based client for the Music Player Daemon (MPD) The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 566162 [1], 553382 [2] The package can be found here: - URL: http://debian.fensalir.fr/ncmpcpp/ - dget http://debian.fensalir.fr/ncmpcpp/ncmpcpp_0.5.2-1.dsc Thanks, Regards, [0] http://unkart.ovh.org/ncmpcpp/ [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=566162 [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=553382 Looks good, some notes: * you didn't Close: #XX these bugs from debian/changelog. * you didn't pass --enable-visualizer flag to configure as suggested in 553382, though it is autodetected, but better stay on the safe side. * as caught by cppcheck [charset.cpp:103]: (error) Mismatching allocation and deallocation: tmp [charset.cpp:120]: (error) Mismatching allocation and deallocation: tmp i.e. whatever is allocated by strdup(3) should be released by free(3), and not by delete[], even if it works by pure luck (since delete op might be implemented by free with some implementations) -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: RFS: ncmpcpp (updated package)
Hello, First, thanks for your review. On 03 Mar - 20:11, George Danchev wrote: * you didn't Close: #XX these bugs from debian/changelog. It has been done in a previous package version (0.5-0.1) but my sponsor did not have the time to upload it. The provided package is for 0.5.2, the current debian version is 0.4.1, but my package includes versions 0.5.0 and 0.5.1 between (they have never been uploaded). * you didn't pass --enable-visualizer flag to configure as suggested in 553382, though it is autodetected, but better stay on the safe side. I don't understand, the rules file is not good? From the rules file: DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS := --enable-clock \ --enable-unicode \ --without-iconv \ --enable-outputs \ --enable-visualizer \ --with-curl \ --with-taglib * as caught by cppcheck [charset.cpp:103]: (error) Mismatching allocation and deallocation: tmp [charset.cpp:120]: (error) Mismatching allocation and deallocation: tmp i.e. whatever is allocated by strdup(3) should be released by free(3), and not by delete[], even if it works by pure luck (since delete op might be implemented by free with some implementations) Ok, I will take a look a this. Thanks, Regards, -- Damien Leone damien.le...@fensalir.fr Web: http://dleone.fensalir.fr/ GPG: 0x82EB4DDF signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: ncmpcpp (updated package)
Damien Leone writes: Hello, First, thanks for your review. On 03 Mar - 20:11, George Danchev wrote: * you didn't Close: #XX these bugs from debian/changelog. It has been done in a previous package version (0.5-0.1) but my sponsor did not have the time to upload it. The provided package is for 0.5.2, the current debian version is 0.4.1, but my package includes versions 0.5.0 and 0.5.1 between (they have never been uploaded). * you didn't pass --enable-visualizer flag to configure as suggested in 553382, though it is autodetected, but better stay on the safe side. I don't understand, the rules file is not good? From the rules file: DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS := --enable-clock \ --enable-unicode \ --without-iconv \ --enable-outputs \ --enable-visualizer \ --with-curl \ --with-taglib Disregard these two, I actually overlooked. * as caught by cppcheck [charset.cpp:103]: (error) Mismatching allocation and deallocation: tmp [charset.cpp:120]: (error) Mismatching allocation and deallocation: tmp i.e. whatever is allocated by strdup(3) should be released by free(3), and not by delete[], even if it works by pure luck (since delete op might be implemented by free with some implementations) Ok, I will take a look a this. Good. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201003032030.38593.danc...@spnet.net
Re: RFS: ncmpcpp (updated package)
Hello, On 03 Mar - 20:11, George Danchev wrote: i.e. whatever is allocated by strdup(3) should be released by free(3), and not by delete[], even if it works by pure luck (since delete op might be implemented by free with some implementations) I included a patch to the package. It should be cppcheck clean now. Url: http://debian.fensalir.fr/ncmpcpp/ dget http://debian.fensalir.fr/ncmpcpp/ncmpcpp_0.5.2-1.dsc I will notify upstream about this. -- Damien Leone damien.le...@fensalir.fr Web: http://dleone.fensalir.fr/ GPG: 0x82EB4DDF signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: ncmpcpp (updated package)
Damien Leone writes: Hello, On 03 Mar - 20:11, George Danchev wrote: i.e. whatever is allocated by strdup(3) should be released by free(3), and not by delete[], even if it works by pure luck (since delete op might be implemented by free with some implementations) I included a patch to the package. It should be cppcheck clean now. Url: http://debian.fensalir.fr/ncmpcpp/ dget http://debian.fensalir.fr/ncmpcpp/ncmpcpp_0.5.2-1.dsc I will notify upstream about this. Okay, uploaded, thanks! P.S. I didn't forget to pass the proper -v so that the relevant entries get included in the *.changes file, and BTS magic to close these up for you. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [RFH] Debian 2.6.32 CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY, wireless-regdb and crda
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 04:44 +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote: Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: Can you guys upstream a package into Debian with a gitweb URL reference? If I'm understanding the question correctly, yes. We have Vcs-$VCS (i.e. Vcs-Git) and Vcs-Browser pseudo-headers. Both are optional. The Vcs-* fields are for the Debian package VCS. There is an emerging project to add upstream metadata to Debian source packages: http://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata I agree with Kel here, git2cl et al are unimportant details. Indeed, that is why the relevant lintian warning is marked pedantic. Personally I think this part of Debian policy needs a review, I don't have the time or energy to bring it up on debian-policy though. Kel, mail me in private when you have something ready for review upload, as usual. Check this thread: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-wpa-devel/2010-March/thread.html#2541 He already created almost perfect packages that are pretty-much ready to be uploaded, just a couple of minor issues. BTW -- while we're on the topic of 2.6.32 and the next Debian release, and 802.11, do you guys ship iw by default yet? If not I highly encourage it. It should be shipped just as iwconfig is shipped. iw is the replacement for iwconfig, it uses the new nl80211 and nl80211 is used by all cfg80211 and mac80211 drivers. All new upstream drivers have to be cfg80211 based (or mac80211) so hence why I recommend to just ship iw by default today. Luis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/43e72e891003031416m5572e171j8c7978b77b278...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: sweethome3d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/03/2010 02:39 PM, Michal Čihař wrote: Okay, the bug is that default-jdk should be in Build-Depends and not in Build-Depends-Indep, because it is required for clean. It seems you're not satisfying build dependencies (d-bp with -d option?). /usr/lib/jvm/default-java is included in default-jre-headless and default-jdk is a builddep that depends on default-jre that depends on default-jre-headless. No, please read: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-sourcebinarydeps The problem is that default-jdk is listed in Build-Depends-Indep, while it should be in Build-Depends because it is also required for clean target of debian/rules. Thanks for pointing it out. Could you please get the following: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/freehep-xml/freehep-xml_2.1.2+dfsg1-3.dsc http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/freehep-graphicsio-svg/freehep-graphicsio-svg_2.1.1-2.dsc Cheers, Gabriele -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuO7hsACgkQp3cdCbVcnCsPFgCg5dnybw+zZyOR4iBn8CGI6JEX Ar0AoPhi2XHHYbAIM1MVT+p9Zn6etf21 =Cz7b -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b8eee1b.7060...@gmail.com
Re: [RFH] Debian 2.6.32 CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY, wireless-regdb and crda
[Luis R. Rodriguez] BTW -- while we're on the topic of 2.6.32 and the next Debian release, and 802.11, do you guys ship iw by default yet? It's available (version 0.9.14), but not shipped by default. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100303235033.gi18...@p12n.org
Re: [RFH] Debian 2.6.32 CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY, wireless-regdb and crda
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org wrote: [Luis R. Rodriguez] BTW -- while we're on the topic of 2.6.32 and the next Debian release, and 802.11, do you guys ship iw by default yet? It's available (version 0.9.14), but not shipped by default. Can it? Luis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/43e72e891003031751uf0965a0o427708d86976a...@mail.gmail.com
Re: [RFH] Debian 2.6.32 CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY, wireless-regdb and crda
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 17:51 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org wrote: [Luis R. Rodriguez] BTW -- while we're on the topic of 2.6.32 and the next Debian release, and 802.11, do you guys ship iw by default yet? It's available (version 0.9.14), but not shipped by default. Can it? Depends on what you mean by 'default'. I think there's a good case for including it in the 'laptop' task, but not in the standard system (desktops and servers generally don't need it). It should also be upgraded to 'optional' priority. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Q. Which is the greater problem in the world today, ignorance or apathy? A. I don't know and I couldn't care less. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: RFS: hamlib (updated package)
I revoke my request for sponsorship; the new hamlib version has been uploaded. -Kamal Mostafa On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 13:40 -0800, Kamal Mostafa wrote: I have packaged a revision of hamlib, which I propose for review and upload by a kindly sponsor. I am the Debian maintainer (u) for the package and a member of the upstream project team. http://www.whence.com/debian/proposed/hamlib_1.2.10-2.dsc changelog: hamlib (1.2.10-2) unstable; urgency=low * Install omitted modules: rs, spid (Closes: #571180, LP: #526813). * Cherry-pick Yaesu FT-767GX frequency fix (Closes: #571175, LP: #526749) - upstream trunk svn revision 2766 [Steve Conklin]. * Add package Homepage: http://www.hamlib.org/. * Fix some lintian warnings. Thanks! -Kamal Mostafa ka...@whence.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1267681571.590.11.ca...@fourier
