Re: RFS: netstat-nat (updated package, QA upload)
Hi, On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 11:44:18AM +0200, Johann Felix Soden wrote: netstat-nat - tool that display NAT connections What is the advantage over conntrack -L? Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100628092737.ga4...@richter
Re: Packages with DMUA but no DM (was: Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package with AudioScrobbler support))
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dne Sat, 26 Jun 2010 21:45:25 -0500 Raphael Geissert geiss...@debian.org napsal(a): -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Wise wrote: On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Nanakos Chrysostomos nana...@wired-net.gr wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.11-4 of my package mpg321. According to the PTS the package has DMUA set on it, so you should be able to build and upload it yourself. Except that Nanakos isn't a DM according to [1] and [2], which makes me wonder why Michal sponsored an upload that sets the field. I really did not check whether he is DM, sorry. I've already uploaded few version of mpg321 and though it would be okay to keep DMUA there. I just did not expect somebody would add DMUA while not being DM ... lesson learned. - -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkwobxgACgkQ3DVS6DbnVgTXqQCeNRzM8oew/poJnV9fcfzl61PU pB8AnjVZoqBDVAAYrUtHKlBSiB0Svoa0 =qpRx -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Packages with DMUA but no DM (was: Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package with AudioScrobbler support))
Il giorno lun, 28/06/2010 alle 11.44 +0200, Michal Čihař ha scritto: [...] I just did not expect somebody would add DMUA while not being DM ... lesson learned. Just curiosity, but... why is this a problem? I mean: couldn't a DD say I trust you on this package but you're still not DM - I set the flag so it's useful in case you become it?! Is there some key-related security trap I'm missing? thanks Pietro signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Packages with DMUA but no DM (was: Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package with AudioScrobbler support))
Il giorno lun, 28/06/2010 alle 11.44 +0200, Michal Čihař ha scritto: [...] I just did not expect somebody would add DMUA while not being DM ... lesson learned. Just curiosity, but... which lesson? I mean: couldn't a DD say I trust you for this package but you're still not DM - I set the flag so it's useful in case you become it?! Is the problem that it's unsecure to trust an email address which key is still not officially known to Debian? thanks Pietro signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Packages with DMUA but no DM (was: Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package with AudioScrobbler support))
Hi Dne Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:57:22 +0200 Pietro Battiston m...@pietrobattiston.it napsal(a): Il giorno lun, 28/06/2010 alle 11.44 +0200, Michal Čihař ha scritto: [...] I just did not expect somebody would add DMUA while not being DM ... lesson learned. Just curiosity, but... which lesson? Because I should check it more carefully. I mean: couldn't a DD say I trust you for this package but you're still not DM - I set the flag so it's useful in case you become it?! Is the problem that it's unsecure to trust an email address which key is still not officially known to Debian? I think the biggest problem is that it is confusing - eg. PTS shows this information and make people think there is no need to sponsor this package (like it happened now). -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: netstat-nat (updated package, QA upload)
Hi, On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:27 +0200, Simon Richter wrote: On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 11:44:18AM +0200, Johann Felix Soden wrote: netstat-nat - tool that display NAT connections What is the advantage over conntrack -L? The main difference is the output format: netstat-nat uses a table output format similar to netstat, which in my eyes is more human readable than the output of conntrack. Additionally, netstat-nat can resolve IP addresses and port-numbers. conntrack, the official tool from netfilter.org, provides a full interface to connection tracking and has some other features like xml output, while netstat-nat can only display the most important information about tracked connections. See the man pages for the details. A short look to the popcon statistics [1,2] shows, that netstat-nat enjoys about the same popularity as the some years younger conntrack. Johann Felix [1] http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=netstat-nat [2] http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=conntrack -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1277733310.7875.262.ca...@lapjfs
RFS: subversion (updated package) [lenny-backports, 1.6.12dfsg-1~bpo50+2]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors and backporters, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.12dfsg-1~bpo50+2 of my package subversion. subversion (1.6.12dfsg-1~bpo50+2) lenny-backports; urgency=medium * Rebuild for lenny-backports. * Disable ra_serf, need a newer version than the one in lenny. * Build-depend on libdb4.6-dev, suggest db4.6-util. * Build-depend on openjdk-6-jdk instead of gcj-jdk. * Depend on openjdk-6-jre-headless instead of gij. * control: Fix version control URLs. -- Michael Diers mdi...@elego.de Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:13:50 +0200 It builds these binary packages: libapache2-svn - Subversion server modules for Apache libsvn-dev - Development files for Subversion libraries libsvn-doc - Developer documentation for libsvn libsvn-java - Java bindings for Subversion libsvn-perl - Perl bindings for Subversion libsvn-ruby - Ruby bindings for Subversion (dummy package) libsvn-ruby1.8 - Ruby bindings for Subversion libsvn1- Shared libraries used by Subversion python-subversion - Python bindings for Subversion subversion - Advanced version control system subversion-tools - Assorted tools related to Subversion The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/subversion - - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/subversion/subversion_1.6.12dfsg-1~bpo50+2.dsc Version Control System: - - VCS: svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-subversion/src/lenny-backports-1.6.x/ - - VCS browser: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-subversion/src/lenny-backports-1.6.x/ I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards - -- Michael Diers, elego Software Solutions GmbH, http://www.elego.de -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkwotWkACgkQcEKlWnqVgz3g4gCgoeh4bnPMJdgDkpAcRYVsZA9y iukAnAibp13GxxCKDS2tMZWsG+8wdAET =w2hT -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c28b569.1090...@elego.de
RFS: sunpinyin - Simplified Chinese Input Method from SUN
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package sunpinyin. * Package name: sunpinyin Version : 2.0.2~git20100627-1 Upstream Author : Lei Zhang phill.zh...@sun.com Ervin Yan ervin@sun.com Yong Sun m...@yongsun.me Kefu Chai tchai...@gmail.com Wei Xue wei@sun.com Leo Zheng zym...@gmail.com chumsdock vor...@gmail.com Mike Qinmikeandm...@gmail.com * URL : http://code.google.com/p/sunpinyin * License : LGPL-2.1 or CDDL Section : libs It builds these binary packages: libsunpinyin-dev - Simplified Chinese Input Method from SUN libsunpinyin3 - Simplified Chinese Input Method from SUN sunpinyin-utils - Simplified Chinese Input Method from SUN The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 478811 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sunpinyin - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sunpinyin/sunpinyin_2.0.2~git20100627-1.dsc The initial ITP is not reported by me, I've contacted with the original reporter kefu chai and he allowed me to work on this package[1]. I've uploaded ibus-sunpinyin too, which can be downloaded with dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/ibus-sunpinyin/ibus- sunpinyin_2.0.2~git20100628-1.dsc Even it is not in good shape(lack of some Build-Depends and Depends and cannot be compiled in my pbuilder), it can be used to verify sunpinyin. I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2010/06/msg00460.html Kind regards -- Liang Guo http://bluestone.cublog.cn signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: RFS: sunpinyin - Simplified Chinese Input Method from SUN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Liang Guo wrote: It builds these binary packages: libsunpinyin-dev - Simplified Chinese Input Method from SUN libsunpinyin3 - Simplified Chinese Input Method from SUN sunpinyin-utils - Simplified Chinese Input Method from SUN The initial ITP is not reported by me, I've contacted with the original reporter kefu chai and he allowed me to work on this package[1]. I've uploaded ibus-sunpinyin too, which can be downloaded with dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/ibus-sunpinyin/ibus- sunpinyin_2.0.2~git20100628-1.dsc Even it is not in good shape(lack of some Build-Depends and Depends and cannot be compiled in my pbuilder), it can be used to verify sunpinyin. I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Hi, how does this compares to, let's say, scim-pinyin, or the other pinyin modules that we can find currently in the archive? Is it better or at least as good as googlepinyin in Window? (I'm not talking about the one in Unix that I already packaged but that is buggy, and which I might give-up on). What other alternative do we have in the archive for typing in Chinese using ibus? (I only used SCIM so far) I might be interested in doing this sponsoring, as my wife is Chinese and uses Ubuntu, and that I often (have to) type in Chinese as well. Just one thing: I don't think it is a good idea to sponsor onlythe library without the ibus module. I strongly believe that these should be packaged and sponsored at the same time. In other words: I wont sponsor or even look at your package until you say that ibus-sunpinyin is ready as well. Note: I'm a new DD since last Sunday, so I'll have to learn on how to make my first sponsoring as well! :) Last thing: where do you live? I'm in Shanghai, even though I'm a French guy. I'd like to push more Chinese to use, promote, and enhance Debian... Thomas Goirand (zigo) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkwo/fYACgkQl4M9yZjvmkmlRwCggKQbALTzfR3Ym/jrK0YTmSmy ZVsAn303Vqa/8ICiNhlNKidG5hmlceoU =6Idg -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c28fdf9.6090...@debian.org
RFS: nc6 (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0-7 of my package nc6. It builds these binary packages: netcat6- TCP/IP swiss army knife with IPv6 support The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix the bug 586999 that i have involuntarily generated (by wanted to implement a new option to close 581894) The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nc6 - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nc6/nc6_1.0-7.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: RFS: sunpinyin - Simplified Chinese Input Method from SUN
On 星期二 29 6月 2010 03:54:33 Thomas Goirand wrote: Liang Guo wrote: It builds these binary packages: libsunpinyin-dev - Simplified Chinese Input Method from SUN libsunpinyin3 - Simplified Chinese Input Method from SUN sunpinyin-utils - Simplified Chinese Input Method from SUN The initial ITP is not reported by me, I've contacted with the original reporter kefu chai and he allowed me to work on this package[1]. I've uploaded ibus-sunpinyin too, which can be downloaded with dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/ibus-sunpinyin/ibus- sunpinyin_2.0.2~git20100628-1.dsc Even it is not in good shape(lack of some Build-Depends and Depends and cannot be compiled in my pbuilder), it can be used to verify sunpinyin. I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Hi, Hi, Thomas, how does this compares to, let's say, scim-pinyin, or the other pinyin modules that we can find currently in the archive? sunpinyin is a statistical language model(SLM) based input method, it show you the candidate based on its usage frequency in common life, which makes it smarter then other pinyin input method. For detailed information on SLM, please visit http://code.google.com/p/sunpinyin/wiki/CodeTourOfSLMTraining Is it better or at least as good as googlepinyin in Window? (I'm not talking about the one in Unix that I already packaged but that is buggy, and which I might give-up on). I have not used googlepinyin, I use sougou in Windows, it is hard to compare sougou and sunpinyin, both of them are fast. What other alternative do we have in the archive for typing in Chinese using ibus? (I only used SCIM so far) there is a pinyin imput method, it works and it is fast, but not smart(IMO), for example, I usually need press Pg Dn several times to find the word I want input. Sunpinyin have a SCIM front end too, for I don't use SCIM, I cannot test it simply. I might be interested in doing this sponsoring, as my wife is Chinese and uses Ubuntu, and that I often (have to) type in Chinese as well. Just one thing: I don't think it is a good idea to sponsor onlythe library without the ibus module. I strongly believe that these should be packaged and sponsored at the same time. In other words: I wont sponsor or even look at your package until you say that ibus-sunpinyin is ready as well. ibus-sunpinyin may need minor tuning on Build-Depends and Depends fields in debian/control before they can be considered in good shape. ibus-sunpinyin depends on libsunpinyin-dev, so I don't have a simple methord to compile it in pbuilder. And I don't know how the upstream maintainer will release sunpinyin in next release, sunpinyin and all its frontend in one package or in different package. If they release everything in one package, I may consider put everything in one source package. This is the reason I prefer to upload to experimental too. Note: I'm a new DD since last Sunday, so I'll have to learn on how to make my first sponsoring as well! :) Last thing: where do you live? I'm in Shanghai, even though I'm a French guy. I'd like to push more Chinese to use, promote, and enhance Debian... I've shortly stayed in Shanghai in the begin of this year. It is a beautiful city. I'm in ShenZhen now. Thomas Goirand (zigo) Thankyou for your review on my package. -- Liang Guo http://bluestone.cublog.cn signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
