Re: RFS: archivemount (updated package, 3rd try)
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:29:49PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: Will this upload resolve the problem of compiling only to linux and kfreebsd and exclude hurd-i386 architecture? I changed Architecture Field from any to linux-any. kfreebsd is not linux so setting linux-any you excluded it. I think you need to narrow the arch field only when the code *fails to compile* because, for example, of some linux-only syscall. When it doesn't build because of missing build-deps, that may change in the future so I don't do anything (I'm quite new to Debian packaging so I may be wrong though). -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: archivemount (updated package, 3rd try)
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 12:35:43PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:29:49PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: Will this upload resolve the problem of compiling only to linux and kfreebsd and exclude hurd-i386 architecture? I changed Architecture Field from any to linux-any. kfreebsd is not linux so setting linux-any you excluded it. I think you need to narrow the arch field only when the code *fails to compile* because, for example, of some linux-only syscall. When it doesn't build because of missing build-deps, that may change in the future so I don't do anything (I'm quite new to Debian packaging so I may be wrong though). The original problem was that fuse-utils wasn't available on kfreebsd (according to the bugreport). Just yesterday(?) Daniel Baumann adopted fuse and changed the package contents and currently fuse-utils is only a dummy package. This requires some re-evaluation of the situation and adjustmend of the archivemount depends. Sven -- I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart, comes a rebel fist [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110528065332.GA1834@colin
Re: RFS: archivemount (updated package, 3rd try)
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 08:53:33AM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 12:35:43PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:29:49PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: Will this upload resolve the problem of compiling only to linux and kfreebsd and exclude hurd-i386 architecture? I changed Architecture Field from any to linux-any. kfreebsd is not linux so setting linux-any you excluded it. I think you need to narrow the arch field only when the code *fails to compile* because, for example, of some linux-only syscall. When it doesn't build because of missing build-deps, that may change in the future so I don't do anything (I'm quite new to Debian packaging so I may be wrong though). Hi, The original problem was that fuse-utils wasn't available on kfreebsd The problem was not in kfreebsd but in hurd-i386. (according to the bugreport). Just yesterday(?) Daniel Baumann adopted fuse and changed the package contents and currently fuse-utils is The problem still remains even if Daniel Baumann has adopted and uploaded a new version of the fuse package. Please check [0] again to see that the status of hurd-i386 architecture has a dependency installability. So even with this change archivemount will remain in the current state and useless for all linux users. I prefer the package to be sponsored and used for now only from linux and kfreebsd users and when everything is ready we will upload the package again including the missing architecture. I included kfreebsd-any in the Architecture Field and re-uploaded the package. Please bare in mind that the package remains in the current state for more than 300 days waiting fuse-utils for the hurd-i386 arch. only a dummy package. This requires some re-evaluation of the situation and adjustmend of the archivemount depends. Do we need that for the moment? Thanks in advance [0]: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=fuse Sven -- I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart, comes a rebel fist [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110528065332.GA1834@colin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110528084839.ga3...@dinofilaria.home
Re: RFS: archivemount (updated package, 3rd try)
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 11:48:39AM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 08:53:33AM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: Hi, The original problem was that fuse-utils wasn't available on kfreebsd The problem was not in kfreebsd but in hurd-i386. I have the slight feeling we're talking about different issue here. According to #613119, which you even close in your changelog, it's been about kfreebsd, and as far as I can tell there's been no fuse-utils package on kfreebsd nor hurd and there is now no fuse package on both of them. So this problem isn't solved at all. I currently can't say if archivemount is of any use without the rest of the fuse tools or not. Looking at the blocking bug #613300 I don't think it is but I've not digged that deep yet. If it is indeed useful to have on kfreebsd without fuse the dependency has to be adjusted accordingly [!kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64]. Otherwise using linux-any seems to be a good solution, it's not worth to build a package on architectures where it can't be used anyway. The problem still remains even if Daniel Baumann has adopted and uploaded a new version of the fuse package. Please check [0] again to see that the status of hurd-i386 architecture has a dependency installability. So even with this change archivemount will remain in the current state and useless for all linux users. I prefer the package to be sponsored and used for now only from linux and kfreebsd users and when everything is ready we will upload the package again including the missing architecture. I included kfreebsd-any in the Architecture Field and re-uploaded the package. Please bare in mind that the package remains in the current state for more than 300 days waiting fuse-utils for the hurd-i386 arch. Uh since when is hurd a release architecture? The migration seems to be stopped by the RC bug mentioned above. only a dummy package. This requires some re-evaluation of the situation and adjustmend of the archivemount depends. Do we need that for the moment? IMO it would make sense to do it now while you're at it, I'd guess that Daniel would like to fate out the old fuse-utils package sooner or later anyway. So switching now to a versioned depends on fuse =2.8.5-2 is IMO reasonable. Beside that: There's still lintian barking at the issue with the description. I'm not sure if lintian is 100% right there and if the deselect issue is still present but double spaces in front of the * should do the trick. IMHO all the (useless) dotted empty lines are a bit ugly, I would revert that. You should also check your changelog, beside closing a bug which isn't fixed with arch kfreebsd-any the changelog only states the change from any to linux-any. The changes to debian/rules are also missing. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110528112602.GA2340@marvin
Re: RFS: archivemount (updated package, 3rd try)
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 01:26:02PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 11:48:39AM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 08:53:33AM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: Hi, Hi, The original problem was that fuse-utils wasn't available on kfreebsd The problem was not in kfreebsd but in hurd-i386. I have the slight feeling we're talking about different issue here. According to #613119, which you even close in your changelog, it's been about kfreebsd, and as far as I can tell there's been no fuse-utils package on kfreebsd nor hurd and there is now no fuse package on both of them. So this problem isn't solved at all. Yes, the problem remains on both of them. I currently can't say if archivemount is of any use without the rest of the fuse tools or not. Looking at the blocking bug #613300 I don't think it is but I've not digged that deep yet. If it is indeed useful to have on kfreebsd without fuse the dependency has to be adjusted accordingly [!kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64]. Otherwise using linux-any seems to be a good solution, it's not worth to build a package on architectures where it can't be used anyway. As I can see the solution is using linux-any at the moment. The problem still remains even if Daniel Baumann has adopted and uploaded a new version of the fuse package. Please check [0] again to see that the status of hurd-i386 architecture has a dependency installability. So even with this change archivemount will remain in the current state and useless for all linux users. I prefer the package to be sponsored and used for now only from linux and kfreebsd users and when everything is ready we will upload the package again including the missing architecture. I included kfreebsd-any in the Architecture Field and re-uploaded the package. Please bare in mind that the package remains in the current state for more than 300 days waiting fuse-utils for the hurd-i386 arch. Uh since when is hurd a release architecture? The migration seems to be stopped by the RC bug mentioned above.i You are right. only a dummy package. This requires some re-evaluation of the situation and adjustmend of the archivemount depends. Do we need that for the moment? IMO it would make sense to do it now while you're at it, I'd guess that Daniel would like to fate out the old fuse-utils package sooner or later anyway. So switching now to a versioned depends on fuse =2.8.5-2 is IMO reasonable. It seems reasonable. Fixed already. Beside that: There's still lintian barking at the issue with the description. I'm not sure if lintian is 100% right there and if the deselect issue is still present but double spaces in front of the * should do the trick. IMHO all the (useless) dotted empty lines are a bit ugly, I would revert that. Fixed by simply adding double spaces in front of the *. You should also check your changelog, beside closing a bug which isn't fixed with arch kfreebsd-any the changelog only states the change from any to linux-any. The changes to debian/rules are also missing. I would like to keep my first change which was only linux-any. What do you mean that the changes to debian/rules are missing? I have made the changes you proposed and added the reverse one in clean. No more lintian errors. Maybe I'm missing something here, please enlighten me. I hope this time everything is fine and the package could be sponsored. Package re-uploaded to mentors. Cheers, Chris. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110528112602.GA2340@marvin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110528114859.ga4...@dinofilaria.home
Re: RFS: archivemount (updated package, 3rd try)
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 02:48:59PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 01:26:02PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: Hi, You should also check your changelog, beside closing a bug which isn't fixed with arch kfreebsd-any the changelog only states the change from any to linux-any. The changes to debian/rules are also missing. I would like to keep my first change which was only linux-any. Yes, that's ok. What do you mean that the changes to debian/rules are missing? I have made the changes you proposed and added the reverse one in clean. No more lintian errors. Maybe I'm missing something here, please enlighten me. You made changes to debian/control and debian/rules and they're not documented in debian/changelog. I'd think of something like this: * Change the dependency on fuse-utils to fuse (=2.8.5-2). Since fuse 2.8.5-2 fuse-utils package is only a transitional dummy package. * Change debian/rules to keep a backup copy of config.guess in the configure target which will be restored in the clean target, to keep the diff.gz clean. Maybe that's a bit too verbose, but it helps to recap later, why those changes were made. I hope this time everything is fine and the package could be sponsored. Very close, beside the changelog everything else looks ok. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110528122931.GB2340@marvin
Re: RFS: gtk2-engines-equinox
The gtk2-engines-equinox package is now ready for upload. This package is based on the version I've been maintaining in Ubuntu: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk2-engines-equinox . See http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gtk2-engines-equinox/ . ITP bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599658 I'd be glad if someone sponsored the initial version of the package into unstable. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: RFS: archivemount (updated package, 3rd try)
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 02:29:31PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 02:48:59PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 01:26:02PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: Hi, You should also check your changelog, beside closing a bug which isn't fixed with arch kfreebsd-any the changelog only states the change from any to linux-any. The changes to debian/rules are also missing. I would like to keep my first change which was only linux-any. Yes, that's ok. What do you mean that the changes to debian/rules are missing? I have made the changes you proposed and added the reverse one in clean. No more lintian errors. Maybe I'm missing something here, please enlighten me. You made changes to debian/control and debian/rules and they're not documented in debian/changelog. I'd think of something like this: * Change the dependency on fuse-utils to fuse (=2.8.5-2). Since fuse 2.8.5-2 fuse-utils package is only a transitional dummy package. * Change debian/rules to keep a backup copy of config.guess in the configure target which will be restored in the clean target, to keep the diff.gz clean. Maybe that's a bit too verbose, but it helps to recap later, why those changes were made. Fixed. Thanks! I hope this time everything is fine and the package could be sponsored. Very close, beside the changelog everything else looks ok. Re-uploaded to mentors.d.n Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110528122931.GB2340@marvin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110528123646.gb4...@dinofilaria.home
Re: RFS: archivemount (updated package, 3rd try)
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 03:36:46PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: Re-uploaded to mentors.d.n Uploaded to the archive. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110528130756.GC2340@marvin
Re: RFS: archivemount (updated package, 3rd try)
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 03:07:56PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 03:36:46PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: Re-uploaded to mentors.d.n Uploaded to the archive. Thank you very much for your time and effort in helping and sponsoring this package. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110528130756.GC2340@marvin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110528131035.ga27...@dinofilaria.home
Bug#628285: RFP: xul-ext-pencil -- GUI prototyping and diagram tool
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: xul-ext-pencil Version : 1.2 Upstream Author : Nguyen Tien Dung dung.ngu...@evolus.vn * URL : http://pencil.evolus.vn * License : GPL2+ Programming Lang: Javascript / Xulrunner app Description : The Sketching and GUI Prototyping addon for Firefox/Iceweasel The Pencil Project's unique mission is to build a free and opensource tool for making diagrams and GUI prototyping that everyone can use. Top features: Built-in stencils for diagraming and prototyping Multi-page document with background page Inter-page linkings! On-screen text editing with rich-text supports Exporting to HTML, PNG, Openoffice.org document, Word document and PDF. Undo/redo supports Installing user-defined stencils and templates Standard drawing operations: aligning, z-ordering, scaling, rotating... Cross-platforms Adding external objects Personal Collection Clipart Browser Object snapping Sketchy Stencil And much more... I discovered this software a few weeks ago and I would like to see it packaged for Debian (but I don't want to do it myself). It should probably be maintained under the umbrella of the pkg-mozext team: http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianMozExtTeam Unfortunately the current version is not compatible with Firefox 4 yet. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English) ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110528134820.ga12...@rivendell.home.ouaza.com
RFS: assaultcube-data (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.0.4+repacknot1-1 of my package assaultcube-data. It builds these binary packages: assaultcube-data - data files for AssaultCube assaultcube-server-anticheat - AssaultCube server with closed source anti-cheat module The changes are: * Update manpages - CC-BY-NC-SA (previous license was incorrect given content used) - Few formatting fixes * Update debian/copyright - Note license of manpages - Files: headers pointing at directory instead of license file. * Update debian/rules to dh7 format * New package: assaultcube-server-anticheat, installs upstream server binaries * Create a wrapper script for the server with --help for manpage * Don't repack anymore. The package appears to be lintian clean (overrides manpage not in -server-anticheat, since it's in -data). The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/a/assaultcube-data - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/a/assaultcube-data/assaultcube-data_1.1.0.4+repacknot1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Arand Nash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4de12023.7080...@gmail.com
Re: RFS: haskell-qt
On Friday, 27. May 2011. 0.12.12 Sune Vuorela wrote: gui library is definately wrong if it binds everything. Qt4 frameworks or Qt4 Libraries or ... somtehnig like that. And maybe you even want, if possible to split at least the non-dev stuff in a per library package. (so that simple gui apps doesn't pull in sql things, a web engine and ...) please consider splitting it. Yes, it is split. The qws library part (I renamed it into libhaskell-qt to remove all misunderstandings) provides only .so libraries, and include files are used only internaly. Haskell imports the libraries by importing the methods it needs (like this, for example: foreign import ccall qtc_QObject_pa_oeq). btw, are the bindings based on the smoke library or ? No. I have no idea what the bindings are based on. is it qreal float vs double safe? As far as I know (or can see), the bindings treat qreal as double. Since Haskell doesn't run on Symbian, WinCE nor arm, I don't see that as a big problem. -- Filip Brcic br...@gna.org WWWeb: http://brcha.com Jabber : br...@kdetalk.net GPG 0x2537C379 Fingerprint: 287D 5F24 50AA A36C 977F AC9A F1FD C7EB 2537 C379 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: RFS: haskell-qt
On Friday, 27. May 2011. 10.20.23 Joachim Breitner wrote: You can then upload your packaging via Darcs, tag it as ready to upload (by setting distribution to unstable) and tell us about it, then we will sponsor the upload. I've uploaded the files to pkg-haskell/haskell-qt. -- Filip Brcic br...@gna.org WWWeb: http://brcha.com Jabber : br...@kdetalk.net GPG 0x2537C379 Fingerprint: 287D 5F24 50AA A36C 977F AC9A F1FD C7EB 2537 C379 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: RFS: tartarus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Stefan,
I took a look into your package. I have some comments you may want to
consider.
On 25.05.2011 23:18, Stefan Tomanek wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package tartarus.
...
The upload would fix these bugs: 604447
* You don't mention the ITP you filed in debian/changelog. Please do that.
* You seem to use a merged changelog for your (upstream) changes and
Debian packaging related stuff. This is not the intention of
debian/changelog. You shall outline there /packaging/ relevant changes
in comparison to your upstream package. Moreover you seem to have a
long(er) history of internal used Debian packages you mention in your
changelog. This could be confusing for Debian users, maybe you want to
clean this up, once you eventually moved your upstream changes to a
dedicated upstream changelog. See also [2].
* You use debhelper version 7, you could bump to version 8 as this is
the suggested version to be used these days. Learn more on debhelper(7).
* You should use a VCS to track your packaging efforts [1]. If you don't
have one, you could consider to joint the collab-maint project on Alioth
[3].
* You bundle a Perl module in your source tarball. Please package this
separately. There is a Perl policy covering Perl modules [4]. Once you
did, you may also depend on the ${perl:Depends} substitute dh_perl(1)
generates.
* Your original source tarball did not match the package source
directory you use to produce the package from. This resulted in a
quilt/3.0 changes patch in patches/debian-changes-0.9.8-1. Please update
your source tarball accordingly and re-upload.
* You install man pages through dh_installman, but they belong to the
upstream part of your package. Please consider writing an install target
upstream for them.
* You don't have an install target at all in your upstream package,
eventually you want to add that instead of relying to various debhelper.
Besides of those things (where most are minor improvements) I think your
package looks good, good work.
[1]
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-vcs
[2]
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-changelog-errors
[3] http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/PackagingProject
[4] http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/perl-policy/index.html
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=HbGS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4de189d1.4030...@toell.net
RFS: gambas3
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package gambas3. Gambas is a static-typed object-oriented interpreted language in the BASIC family. It uses it's own bytecode. The IDE is inspired by Microsoft Visual Basic but Gambas is not a VB clone and is not syntax-compatible with it. gambas 3 is a major revision of gambas (gambas2 is currently in Debian). It includes non-compatible changes to the language syntax and libraries. gambas3 and gambas2 can be installed together. * Package name: gambas3 Version : 2.99.1-1 Upstream Author : Benoît Minisini gam...@users.sourceforge.net * URL : http://gambas.sourceforge.net/en/main.html * License : GPL Section : devel It builds these binary packages: gambas3- Complete visual development environment for Gambas gambas3-dev - Gambas compilation tools gambas3-examples - Gambas examples gambas3-gb-cairo - Gambas bindings for cairo gambas3-gb-chart - The Gambas charting component gambas3-gb-compress - The Gambas compression component gambas3-gb-compress-bzlib2 - The Gambas bzlib2 component gambas3-gb-compress-zlib - The Gambas zlib compression component gambas3-gb-crypt - The Gambas crypt encription component gambas3-gb-db - Gambas database access common libraries gambas3-gb-db-form - Gambas database bound controls gambas3-gb-db-mysql - The MySQL driver for the Gambas database component gambas3-gb-db-odbc - The Gambas ODBC driver database component gambas3-gb-db-postgresql - The PostgreSQL driver for the Gambas database component gambas3-gb-db-sqlite2 - The Gambas sqlite2 driver database component gambas3-gb-db-sqlite3 - The Gambas sqlite3 driver database component gambas3-gb-dbus - Gambas bindings for DBUS gambas3-gb-desktop - Gambas Portland project compatibility component gambas3-gb-eval-highlight - The Gambas syntax highlighting component gambas3-gb-form - A gambas native form component gambas3-gb-form-dialog - A gambas native mdi form component gambas3-gb-form-mdi - A gambas native mdi form component gambas3-gb-form-stock - Gambas form stock icons gambas3-gb-gtk - The Gambas gtk component gambas3-gb-gui - The graphical toolkit selector component gambas3-gb-image - A Gambas image effects component gambas3-gb-image-effect - A Gambas image effects component: effects gambas3-gb-image-imlib - A Gambas image effects component: IMLIB bindings gambas3-gb-image-io - A Gambas image effects component: I/O gambas3-gb-info - A Gambas information component gambas3-gb-net - The Gambas networking component gambas3-gb-net-curl - The Gambas advanced networking component gambas3-gb-net-smtp - Gambas component to use smtp protocol gambas3-gb-opengl - The OpenGL component for Gambas gambas3-gb-opengl-glsl - The OpenGL component for Gambas: GL Shading Language subcomponent gambas3-gb-option - The Gambas option component gambas3-gb-pcre - The Gambas regexp component gambas3-gb-pdf - The Gambas pdf component gambas3-gb-qt4 - The Gambas Qt GUI component gambas3-gb-qt4-ext - The Gambas extended Qt GUI component gambas3-gb-qt4-opengl - OpenGL with QT toolkit Gambas component gambas3-gb-qt4-webkit - The Gambas WebKit component gambas3-gb-report - Gambas report component gambas3-gb-sdl - The Gambas SDL component gambas3-gb-sdl-sound - The Gambas SDL component gambas3-gb-settings - Gambas utilities class gambas3-gb-signal - The Gambas signal library gambas3-gb-v4l - The Gambas video for Linux component gambas3-gb-vb - The Gambas to Visual Basic(tm) compatibility component gambas3-gb-web - Gambas CGI for web applications component gambas3-gb-xml - Gambas XML component gambas3-gb-xml-rpc - Gambas RPC component gambas3-gb-xml-xslt - Gambas XSLT component gambas3-ide - Visual development environment for the Gambas programming languag gambas3-runtime - The Gambas runtime gambas3-script - The Gambas scripter The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gambas3 - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gambas3/gambas3_2.99.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Please CC me into replies. Kind regards Ian Haywood -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTi=v5ak1qbievdqjfvayzvvz8xx...@mail.gmail.com
