Re: RFS: gambas3
On Sun, 29 May 2011 14:17:08 +1000, Ian Haywood wrote: Dear mentors, Hello Ian, I am looking for a sponsor for my package gambas3. [..] I had used Gambas in the past, and would be happy to sponsor it (didn't review it yet). However, gambas2 is maintained by José. Have you talked to him about gambas3? Why not forming a Debian Gambas Team? I'd be glad to join it :) If you and José agree, I can create a pkg-gambas team :) Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
RFS: doctrine (updated package, ping)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.4-1 of my package doctrine. It builds these binary packages: doctrine - Tool for object-relational mapping in PHP The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 590006, 594410. It will also prevent CVE 2011-1522 in sid, already fixed in stable-security, see [1]. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622674 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/doctrine - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/doctrine/doctrine_1.2.4-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Federico Gimenez Nieto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTimRRTm1aBQAN1G=pnpdzbl-1ue...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: doctrine (updated package, ping)
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:27:01AM +0200, Federico Giménez Nieto wrote: Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.4-1 of my package doctrine. I'm not sure how the .orig.tar.gz has been generated (didn't digg deeper) but it contains a lot of 1970's files which will result in an auto-reject by ftp-master. Beside that I would like to lobby for dev-ref 6.2.2 and change s/Tool/tool in the short description. Rest seems to be fine at a first glance. Since this is team maintained I wonder if there isn't someone from the team with some more experience in the area to sponsor the upload? Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110529100504.GB2414@marvin
RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4-3 of my package squidguard. It builds these binary packages: squidguard - filter and redirector plugin for Squid squidguard-doc - filter and redirector plugin for Squid - Documentation The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 415306, 628279 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/squidguard - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/squidguard/squidguard_1.4-3.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. And I would be most grateful if a kind sponsor would set the DM-Upload-Allowed (DMUA) bit. FYI here is the last changelog entry: * samples: - Update adding variables in sample.conf.in. - Convert all sample files to UTF-8. * Update of debian/squidGuard.conf. (Closes: #415306) * Update of debian/copyright. * Add support for use with OpenLDAP (thanks to J.A. Medina). * Optimize script debian/update-squidguard. * debian/control: - Update dependencies to libdb4.8. (see #621376) (Closes: #628279) - Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2 (no changes). - Update Vcs links to new server anonscm.debian.org. Kind regards Joachim Wiedorn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110529124311.64bb9...@jupiter.home
RFS: libzipper
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libzipper. * Package name: libzipper Version : 1.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Michael McMaster mich...@codesrc.com (myself) * URL : http://www.codesrc.com/src/libzipper * License : GPLv3+ Section : libs It builds these binary packages: libzipper-dev - simple interface for reading and writing compressed files libzipper-doc - simple interface for reading and writing compressed files libzipper-tools - utilities for reading and writing compressed files libzipper1 - simple interface for reading and writing compressed files The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 628118 My motivation for maintaining this package is: libzipper offers a simple C++ interface for reading and writing gzip, zip, and uncompressed files. It is intended for use in reading small compressed data files, such as configuration files and saved games. I am the upstream author of the package, and I'd like to see it made available to Debian users. I wrote libzipper as the interfaces of similar packages (eg. libzipios++) didn't fulfill my needs. libzipper provides support for multiple file formats, without requiring the library user to worry about the file format when extracting. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libzipper - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libzipper/libzipper_1.0.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Michael McMaster signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Data packet of TEI/XML files best practice
Hi people, I have a clone git repository here which consists of several TEI encoded XML files for Sanskrit philology (https://github.com/paddymcall/SARIT): $ ls SARIT/ astangahrdayasamhita.xml brahmapurana.xml debian manusmrti.xml ratnakIrti-nibandhAvali.xml schemas ayurvedasutram.xml caryamelapakapradipa.xml kautalyarthasastra.xml naradasmrti.xml README.org I'm building a Debian packet from them with simple dh $@ in debian/rules (Debhelper 7) and with a debian/install which goes like this: $ cat debian/install *xml usr/share/sarit schemas usr/share/sarit/schemas README.org usr/share/doc/sarit/ Questions: 1) the Git repo maintainer doesn't uses tags yet, so I've chosen the snapshot for my packet rev number (420aa04-1). For I am building from within Git (debian/ has been blacklisted through .git/info/exclude), is it possible to create the .deb also without a source tarball or what would be best practice to recreate it? 2) I would like to create PDFs from the .xml-s during packet creation, I would guess I would need a override_dh_ for this in debian/rules, which? 3) Would Debian be interested to include such a data packet into the official repos if the copyright issue has been solved? Thanks for any tips towards this easy stuff, Greetings, DS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4de2294b.3020...@danielstender.com
Re: RFS: socketcan-utils
Hello Markus, i really appreciate your attempt to create some debian packages for the SocketCAN utilities and the PEAK driver! (FYI: the PEAK driver is now maintained by Stephane Grosjean) Some more comments inside the text: From: Markus Becker m...@comnets.uni-bremen.de To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: RFS: socketcan Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package socketcan. * Package name: socketcan Better: socketcan-utils or at least 'can-utils' as they are for the standard CAN subsystem of the linux kernel. Details below. Version : 0.0.1+svn1240-1 Upstream Author : Volkswagen Group Electronic Research Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com Vladislav Gribov, IXXAT Automation GmbH, gri...@ixxat.de socketcan-us...@lists.berlios.de Most of the tools in socketcan/trunk/can-utils have been created by myself working at Volkswagen Group Research. This is also the reason of the license text which is a BSD/GPL license which has also been used in the Linux Kernel sources. Setting the license to GPL-2 in Debian packages will fit best. Having a feedback on socketcan-us...@lists.berlios.de worked pretty good so far as many people with know-how are monitoring the list. If you like to have a single maintainer name, you can take me: Oliver Hartkopp socket...@hartkopp.net * URL : svn://svn.berlios.de/socketcan/trunk http://developer.berlios.de/projects/socketcan/ * License : GPL-2 ACK Section : net ACK It builds these binary packages: socketcan-driver - Source for the socketcan kernel modules Please omit the socketcan-driver package idea. The BerliOS SVN is only used for some staging drivers, supporting of outdated kernels and development of new network layer protocols. The Linux Mainline kernel contains the up-to-date CAN drivers. Mixing the socketcan/trunk/kernel/2.6/... with mainline kernel stuff leads to some problems, you won't like so solve ;-) socketcan-utils - Socket-CAN user space programs This is a very good approach. These utilities (e.g. for the slcan driver) are working great for the mainline drivers. The package appears to be lintian clean. My motivation for maintaining this package is: Get CAN automotive networking working in Debian out-of-the-box. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/socketcan - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/socketcan/socketcan_0.0.1+svn1240-1.dsc The upload would fix this RFP bugs: #568303 Please CC me, as I am not subscribed to the list. Me too :-) I've just googled for you as i've seen your commits to the PEAK-System Linux driver packaging from Teemu Ikonen. Best regards, Oliver I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Markus Becker -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4de225bf.2080...@hartkopp.net
Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:43:11PM +0200, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4-3 of my package squidguard. * Oh another DEP5 format definition, and now one that isn't available. I guess that should evolve into some d.n host instead d.o and without the wsvn in it. Or something else. My confusion grows from package to package. :) * I would also document the switch from depends squid | squid3 to squid3 | squid in debian/changelog but YMMV. And I would be most grateful if a kind sponsor would set the DM-Upload-Allowed (DMUA) bit. I won't do it for a one shot upload but maybe Kartik would like to jump in. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110529114129.GA18249@marvin
DEP-5 format definition hell
Hi, I currently see a wild mix of different format definitions used by people hitting debian-mentors. While I personally don't care as long as the copyright file is complete I don't think this fulfills the goal of this DEP. It would be nice if the involved people would clarify what should be used. So far I've seen the following referenced: a) SVN revisions of the mdwn file (seems to be ok) b) http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ (seems to be not that wrong but exactly this current document claims that a revision of the mdwn file should be used) c) a wiki page (rejected that one, seems wrong to me) d) broken links (obviously rejected) TIA, Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110529115729.GB18249@marvin
RFS: piwigo (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.2.1-1 of my package piwigo. I used to have a mentor (Sylvain Le Gall gil...@debian.net ) for that package but he is disconnected from internet for a long time. It builds these binary packages: piwigo - photo gallery software for the web The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 614309 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/piwigo - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/piwigo/piwigo_2.2.1-1.dsc The package is maintained in a git repository : http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-piwigo/piwigo.git I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Nicolas Roudaire
Re: RFS: librsync (updated package)
Hi, Andrey Rahmatullin w...@wrar.name writes: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.7-8 of my package librsync. The package looks good. Have you found a sponsor? -- Kanru pgpJyp9DMaepQ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)
Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de wrote on 2011-05-29 13:41: * Oh another DEP5 format definition, and now one that isn't available. I guess that should evolve into some d.n host instead d.o and without the wsvn in it. Or something else. My confusion grows from package to package. :) Sorry, false copy and paste. Updated! * I would also document the switch from depends squid | squid3 to squid3 | squid in debian/changelog but YMMV. Also done. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110529170216.3f56c...@jupiter.home
Re: DEP-5 format definition hell
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 01:57:29PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: I currently see a wild mix of different format definitions used by people hitting debian-mentors. While I personally don't care as long as the copyright file is complete I don't think this fulfills the goal of this DEP. This is because DEP5 is not finalized yet. When its inclusion into the debian-policy package is final, the official copy of the spec will be at a URL that will be like this: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/copyright-format/1.0 When this is ready, there will be an announcement on debian-devel-announce and every other Format: URL will need to be amended. Until then, use whatever you feel best like. The spec suggests something like this: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?op=filerev=REVISION which seems like a reasonable thing to do, since it documents what version of the spec the file is written against. -- Freedom-based blog/wiki/web hosting: http://www.branchable.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110529155332.ga18...@havelock.liw.fi
Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 05:02:16PM +0200, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: [...] Also done. Shame on me but I missed two other things, I would've commited them to the collab-maint repo but that seems to still miss the the changes in the package. * I see no reason for urgency=high here. There are no security fixes and we're not in the middle of the release process. So urgency=low should be used. * Vcs-Browser should point to the gitweb frontend and not to the http access for the git repository itself. So in this case this should be http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/squidguard.git And a minor one from lintian pedantic checks: squidguard.config uses /bin/sh -e instead of set -e. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110529165247.GA20202@marvin
Re: DEP-5 format definition hell
On 05/29/2011 11:53 PM, Lars Wirzenius wrote: On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 01:57:29PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: I currently see a wild mix of different format definitions used by people hitting debian-mentors. While I personally don't care as long as the copyright file is complete I don't think this fulfills the goal of this DEP. This is because DEP5 is not finalized yet. When its inclusion into the debian-policy package is final, the official copy of the spec will be at a URL that will be like this: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/copyright-format/1.0 When this is ready, there will be an announcement on debian-devel-announce and every other Format: URL will need to be amended. Until then, use whatever you feel best like. The spec suggests something like this: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?op=filerev=REVISION which seems like a reasonable thing to do, since it documents what version of the spec the file is written against. I think it'd be great if what you wrote above was also at: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ Cheers, Thomas P.S: What's blocking DEP5 from reaching the policy? I think it's great the way it is right now already... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4de27cbe.8030...@debian.org
Re: DEP-5 format definition hell
Hello, On Mon, 30 May 2011 01:05:02 +0800 Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: P.S: What's blocking DEP5 from reaching the policy? I think it's great the way it is right now already... Isn't it way too machine-oriented to be in the policy? It's much harder to read it for humans than old good traditional debian/copyright. -- WBR, Andrew signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)
Hello Sven, thanks for your time. Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de wrote on 2011-05-29 18:52: * I see no reason for urgency=high here. There are no security fixes and we're not in the middle of the release process. So urgency=low should be used. There is a reason: package libdb4.7 isn't anymore and if someone want to install (new) squidguard it would be not usable (in testing). Can I use urgency=medium (5 days)? * Vcs-Browser should point to the gitweb frontend and not to the http access for the git repository itself. So in this case this should be http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/squidguard.git There is a terrible muddle with the new Alioth. I had looked onto the git repository which show us the following addresses: URL git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/squidguard.git git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/squidguard.git http://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/squidguard.git and I have thought, this is be right. But what is right now And if not, what should be the right git address (git://)? And a minor one from lintian pedantic checks: squidguard.config uses /bin/sh -e instead of set -e. Ok, changed. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110529200655.6ff8c...@jupiter.home
Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 08:06:55PM +0200, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: Hi, Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de wrote on 2011-05-29 18:52: * I see no reason for urgency=high here. There are no security fixes and we're not in the middle of the release process. So urgency=low should be used. There is a reason: package libdb4.7 isn't anymore and if someone want to install (new) squidguard it would be not usable (in testing). Can I use urgency=medium (5 days)? Yeah some breakage happens from time to time. I still don't think that's a good reason to shorten the staging periode in unstable, or is this inflicted by this new don't break testing cause it's rolling mantra? As long as it's not security relevant or we're in release freeze, in my opinion, every upload should be urgency=low. There is a terrible muddle with the new Alioth. Yes I know, and I don't like it either. I had looked onto the git repository which show us the following addresses: URL git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/squidguard.git git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/squidguard.git http://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/squidguard.git and I have thought, this is be right. But what is right now And if not, what should be the right git address (git://)? The one you would clone as third party: Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/squidguard.git The one you can point your browser to: Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/squidguard.git Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110529182210.GB20202@marvin
Re: RFS: tartarus
Dies schrieb Arno Töll (deb...@toell.net): * You bundle a Perl module in your source tarball. Please package this separately. Even if the perl module is only used by the scripts packaged? I created the module when several programs used the same functions and configuration data, so I am not sure whether a dedicated perl package is really that useful. * Your original source tarball did not match the package source directory you use to produce the package from. This resulted in a quilt/3.0 changes patch in patches/debian-changes-0.9.8-1. Please update your source tarball accordingly and re-upload. This is probably glitch in the git-buildpackage configuration, repackaging should fix that. * You install man pages through dh_installman, but they belong to the upstream part of your package. Please consider writing an install target upstream for them. * You don't have an install target at all in your upstream package, eventually you want to add that instead of relying to various debhelper. I'll think about adding that, thank you. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110529184923.gv13...@zirkel.wertarbyte.de
Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)
Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de wrote on 2011-05-29 20:22: Yeah some breakage happens from time to time. I still don't think that's a good reason to shorten the staging periode in unstable, or is this inflicted by this new don't break testing cause it's rolling mantra? As long as it's not security relevant or we're in release freeze, in my opinion, every upload should be urgency=low. Ok, done. The one you would clone as third party: Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/squidguard.git The one you can point your browser to: Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/squidguard.git Done. Now the only problem is the not existing write access to the git repo of collab-maint ... Thank you very much. The updated version comes in the next minutes. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110529210111.3ad96...@jupiter.home
Re: RFS: tartarus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Stefan, On 29.05.2011 20:49, Stefan Tomanek wrote: * You bundle a Perl module in your source tarball. Please package this separately. Even if the perl module is only used by the scripts packaged? I created the module when several programs used the same functions and configuration data, so I am not sure whether a dedicated perl package is really that useful. you opted to install it to a system wide location, which qualifies for this requirement, yes. If you would choose to install it to a private location (i.e. relative to your program only, not reachable by site @INC) this could come over this requirement[*]. Note it is perfectly fine to bundle the library in a single source tarball, just generate a separate binary (Perl) package. That's not a big deal. [*] At this point I should note I am no Debian Developer. This means I can't sponsor you, therefore you are free to ignore my advises anyway. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJN4poWAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtOQwP+wR9G92YprJheb5mQFaBZq8B 793xipJiHsmTTmoI7XLI3tWsgLr1pKCol2uMzGzXjvCMOBlvaRVdTJpmjI/q0WpP gqHiTQvTbMthXHy/H6gFp4OCCJsfAMDP76rOpRWGvigrOoXAZNxpJlo3FFIDMAlz D9tg8QgWtg+1XmNjsi5FsAihVdxqdiyEmeVboJSYMcZMSH9LJ0F8/L9RWAnvjWRX xEAfaZVjzjQqCq1GngA+cfQISHqcltTuID48QirfzoETnUsbE5eQrbXhU+i685YI fN+bH04ydxSP3UKpDxNAKwdiRlQrd00QEik3YDWHW/MxVlSLIp8j4LAB6tVbO3Ui ApIT1EGdEeFMDt1SKpKiWRk9m3lDS5L41+xHnTt8H1R01uQyOcAM3m+ElnAseDs/ lRuHd/ox98dFogOuUnp/s4W13ok/y97ea05vh25418aJd7cyUNBECB/RTfJcsUQ0 EhO8yV1kxYjDpHla+nrkztDQzNxULBoBJc4CDbUFj55iD9K2IsSKnjURh7VqBmyV lBtd0oDvbA7Kkf/0E3wo2ea0ie4EPRFnFGAdd4ymcTTg5MP7DvfT8+M2STHx2Uce yjbokhWhpvFr14PoA+VMVBcxslSc7N51DiWag92UQa9CYMQVwsLgfOJAigWXnITn oetDiYPA8wTakSIC+Lo4 =3r07 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4de29a17.1080...@toell.net
Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 09:01:11PM +0200, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: Uploaded. Now the only problem is the not existing write access to the git repo of collab-maint ... Hmpf. Is this really a permission denied to write to the repo or did you use ssh with password-auth in the past? I've seen some comments on IRC that the new alioth setup only allows key based ssh logins so you've to add your key via the alioth webfrontend first. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110529200748.GC20202@marvin
Re: DEP-5 format definition hell
Andrew O. Shadoura bugzi...@tut.by writes: It's much harder to read it for humans than old good traditional debian/copyright. I personally don't agree. I think DEP-5 is easier to read because it's the same as every other package that uses DEP-5 (well, once we get the format hammered out), so I can quickly find the information I need and don't have to parse and understand hundreds of different ways of conveying the same information. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/871uzh1d7x@windlord.stanford.edu
RFS: aspell-sr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package aspell-sr. * Package name: aspell-sr Version : 0.02-1 Upstream Author : Goran Rakic g...@devbase.net * URL : http://srpski.org/aspell/ * License : LGPL Section : text It builds these binary packages: aspell-sr - Serbian dictionary for GNU Aspell The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 628528 My motivation for maintaining this package is: I'm Serbian and would like to add Serbian spell dictionary to Debian. The package is already included in Fedora, openSUSE, Gentoo Arch (those are the distros I checked), so it would be quite nice if the package existed on Debian (and *Ubuntu) as well. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aspell-sr - - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aspell-sr/aspell- sr_0.02-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Filip Brcic - -- Filip Brcic br...@gna.org WWWeb: http://brcha.com Jabber : br...@kdetalk.net GPG 0x2537C379 Fingerprint: 287D 5F24 50AA A36C 977F AC9A F1FD C7EB 2537 C379 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJN4qyeAAoJEPH9x+slN8N59FAP/A2LYY4zEmlWkcQMdixY1K2X gap5+Ki/yyl7afk4oGpVWgLjrEveuKtyR9sbfQ2lDdo/eLCw5roJt035Zkjjypax /hMaXu7CY7/ZKC3cqcJw7FSZTg5qVuRL8JaE6lNx6ZM6Ph3VsnrBZojInmXMhuha bEgGVESqJVZ/ajDyhOzegydT64trQU+ssaRWzmsZKUaYU8jLQbJKm4hx+cTfihmb TkvwY2e15B6KZEFCK8waImSXj5Jo5I6mHAI4vdNxjEEEnpmB8+/PyurtTcoL7toJ bhu7x5MtN2tBOk3RrNDTLPm7atkx2tMSIwtqYxWonG8XcQxxiFtqFSOp5CQ7cMpf i9ty7FikR1N2AO/u8PBqWHvhz5EucnO8IGjs+HH1pecnVAeumFQ8nHRNA4gNfhWs 4UiurnR0gsAQloqaCc2CWC5qYzNY1Cm8gMYc308eU4KTsuFY6jBYsDDo8wfls974 eqPv9SM+mPn+syrvihoOgcu8yIfx8qfdaFX9+9m3XmP/r5G2ta/2q4MiXrw74x5n tI3G4vQsOq+81YoZHHgGfKiVoRNufBVKPXaMrRkHwMZy+oKb/IjocSgI/Oywhhvf saU3WMgGwek+55LKy/ykFIvYQmIlDF5IduvECdcHZnHh8a+Sqxj33w7GwDvffFs+ 4en4Dxkiu7pccGnnnQCq =a6kO -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201105292229.20544.br...@gna.org
RFS: kildclient (updated package)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package kildclient. * Package name: kildclient Version : 2.11.1-1 Upstream Author : me (Eduardo M Kalinowski) * URL : http://kildclient.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL-2+ Section : games It builds these binary packages: kildclient - powerful MUD client with a built-in Perl interpreter kildclient-doc - powerful MUD client with a built-in Perl interpreter - - manual The package is lintian clean, and builds in pbuilder. This is an updated package, my usual sponsor (Christoph Haas) is busy at the moment and cannot upload it. It includes a new upstream version, DEP-5 copyright format, uses the new dpkg-source 3.0 (quilt format). The files are at http://kildclient.sourceforge.net/debian/, or just dget http://kildclient.sourceforge.net/debian/kildclient_2.11.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. - -- Eduardo M KALINOWSKI edua...@kalinowski.com.br -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk3iupoACgkQJAYvFKXQ6Tp2LACdGhp1171y3kqY0mIZOE2pDiQU 7skAn1XcmTcgOkoGAZsH8M4bIZdmGL0x =oGYk -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4de2ba9a.4030...@kalinowski.com.br
Re: DEP-5 format definition hell
söndag den 29 maj 2011 klockan 16:53 skrev Lars Wirzenius detta: On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 01:57:29PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: I currently see a wild mix of different format definitions used by people use whatever you feel best like. The spec suggests something like this: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?op=filerev=REVISION However, the address basis http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/ has ceased to exist due to the reorganisation of Alioth, and http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/ is empty at this very moment. How am I to identify a correct, valid, and retraceable version number, to which I can refer to without complaints? Regards, Mats Erik Andersson, DM -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110529235955.ga32...@mea.homelinux.org
