RFS: cl-launch, cl-asdf (updated packages)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.011-1 of my package cl-launch, and the new version 2:2.016-1 of my package cl-asdf. They build these respective binary packages: cl-launch - uniform frontend to running Common Lisp code from the shell cl-asdf - Another System Definition Facility The packages appear to be lintian clean. The package cl-launch can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-launch - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-launch/cl-launch_3.011-1.dsc The package cl-asdf can also be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-asdf - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-asdf/cl-asdf_2.016-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded these packages for me. Kind regards, —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •ReflectionCybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org There is only one way to console a widow. But remember the risk. — Robert Heinlein, Time Enough For Love -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTi=BMNZBB0_+-A7=fv1yhnwxp1d...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)
Hi, On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:03:24PM +0200, Bruno Kleinert wrote: I uploaded the package. Thanks! Stephen signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:06:59AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.5 of the package oss-compat, which I am adopting within the games team. (I believe this makes sense since the main users of the Open Sound System nowadays are old Linux games.) Looks like we've another case of duplicated work here: http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/oss-compat/news/20110608T100624Z.html Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110608101048.GD2362@marvin
RFS: RHash - Utility for computing hash sums and magnet links
Hello! I need a sponsor for the rhash package! http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=rhash Package name: rhash Version : 1.2.5 Upstream Author : Alexey rhash.ad...@gmail.com URL : http://rhash.sourceforge.net/ License : MIT http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php Programming Lang: C RHash is powerful professional utility, supporting a wide range of hashing algorithms, such as CRC32, MD4, MD5, SHA1/SHA2, Tiger, TTH, BitTorrent BTIH, AICH, ED2K, GOST R 34.11-94, RIPEMD-160, HAS-160, EDON-R 256/512, Whirlpool, Snefru. Features: * Output in a predefined (SFV, BSD) or a user-defined format. * Can calculate Magnet links and EDonkey 2000 links. * Updating hash files (adding hash sums of files missing in the hashfile). * Ability to process directories recursively. * Portability: the program works the same on Linux, *BSD or Windows. The LibRHash library is lightweight, thread-safe and easy to learn. It is used by several open source applications. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4def471e.9070...@gmail.com
Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)
Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 01:06 +0200 schrieb Stephen Kitt: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.5 of the package oss-compat, which I am adopting within the games team. (I believe this makes sense since the main users of the Open Sound System nowadays are old Linux games.) It builds these binary packages: oss-compat - Open Sound System (OSS) compatibility package The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 390747, 594376 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/oss-compat - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/oss-compat/oss-compat_0.0.5.dsc It also has a VCS at http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-games/oss-compat.git I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Stephen Kitt Hi, I uploaded the package. Cheers - Fuddl signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: RFS: lugaru (new package)
Am Dienstag, den 07.06.2011, 19:04 +0200 schrieb Arand Nash: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my packages lugaru and lugaru-data. * Package names : lugaru : lugaru-data Versions: 0~20110520.1+hge4354+dfsg-1 : 0~20110520.1+hge4354-1 Upstream Authors: Wolfire Games http://www.wolfire.com : Neal Gompa ngomp...@gmail.com : Alexander Monakov amona...@gmail.com : Côme BERNIGAUD come.bernig...@gmail.com : sf17k * URL : http://code.google.com/p/lugaru/ : http://www.wolfire.com/lugaru * License : GPL-2+, CC-BY-SA, freeware Section : contrib/games : non-free/games They build these binary packages: lugaru - third-person action game lugaru-data - data for the third-person action game lugaru The packages appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix the ITP bug: 626156 (and partly the RFP bug: 607965) My motivation for maintaining this package is: It being a great indie game, having an active upstream, and being something one would expect to be packaged, being famously (though partly) Open Sourced. History lesson: Icculus http://hg.icculus.org/icculus/lugaru did the initial porting to GNU/Linux an was the initial repository when the source was released, the main hub has now moved to http://code.google.com/p/lugaru/ from where the current packaging stems (with major contributions from the r/amonakov-lugaru an p/lugaru-experimental repositories). Inititally Only the source was freely licensed, Wolfire later licensed the game data as freeware, and recently a large chunk of it under CC-BY-SA. Not enough to package the whole into main currently though. The packages can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/l/lugaru : http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/l/lugaru-data - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free : deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/l/lugaru/lugaru_0~20110520.1+hge4354+dfsg-1.dsc dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/l/lugaru-data/lugaru-data_0~20110520.1+hge4354-1.dsc The VCS for lugaru is up for inspection at http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-games/lugaru.git I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. - arand Hi Arand, at a quick review of lugaru I found the following issues: The desktop-file-validate utility (package desktop-file-utils) spit out: lugaru.desktop: error: value 1.1 for key Version in group Desktop Entry is not a known version lugaru.desktop and lugaru.menu: Please supply the full path to the binary or wrapper script like Exec=/usr/games/lugaru to avoid messing with users' PATH environment variable. In lugaru-data debian/control says Section: contrib/games. I didn't notice any dependency or build-dependency on a package from the non-free section, so lugaru-data goes either into main or into non-free. The binary package lugaru-data has a circular dependency on lugaru. It should be Enhances: lugaru. Cheers - Fuddl signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:10:48PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:06:59AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.5 of the package oss-compat, which I am adopting within the games team. (I believe this makes sense since the main users of the Open Sound System nowadays are old Linux games.) Looks like we've another case of duplicated work here: http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/oss-compat/news/20110608T100624Z.html Nope, not duplicated work; the changelog entry is identical to the one that Stephen Kitt worked on in the pkg-games Git repository: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-games/oss-compat.git;a=blob;f=debian/changelog;h=d8b7ea6d6b79bf5125ade0d8f775856d535b40ee;hb=HEAD (argh, yep, ugly URL - just the latest rev of the debian/changelog file in the pkg-games/oss-compat.git repository on Alioth Reborn) I'm not really sure why Fuddl reset the maintainer field when uploading; the usual practice is to set it to the Debian Games Team (as Stephen did) and, if necessary, put the uploader's name in the, well, Uploaders field :) G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@freebsd.org pe...@packetscale.com PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 If this sentence didn't exist, somebody would have invented it. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)
Hi Sven, On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:10:48PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:06:59AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.5 of the package oss-compat, which I am adopting within the games team. (I believe this makes sense since the main users of the Open Sound System nowadays are old Linux games.) Looks like we've another case of duplicated work here: http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/oss-compat/news/20110608T100624Z.html Not quite, that's my package but with a mixed-up Changed-By (which should be me) and Maintainer (which should be the games team). See http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-games/oss-compat.git;a=blob;f=debian/changelog;h=d8b7ea6d6b79bf5125ade0d8f775856d535b40ee;hb=f937da6d054dc2cc29a6605f2abba7ad22a03ae6 for the original changelog! Regards, Stephen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110608115127.gz31...@sk2.org
Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 02:57:58PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: Hi, with so many replies, I guess I should write one more. :-/ I'm not really sure why Fuddl reset the maintainer field when uploading; the usual practice is to set it to the Debian Games Team (as Stephen did) and, if necessary, put the uploader's name in the, well, Uploaders field :) That's what obviously made me write the mail, I didn't even look at the package itself, just checked the qa page first for bugs et al and found the upload - from a different maintainer. Just after sending my reply I received the 'Thanks' mail and thought that they've worked that out in private and everyone else would ignore my now pointless mail. So thanks to the involved people to ack that everything went smooth and in agreement. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110608122120.GF2362@marvin
Re: RFS: lugaru (new package)
On 08/06/11 13:37, Bruno Kleinert wrote: Hi Arand, at a quick review of lugaru I found the following issues: The desktop-file-validate utility (package desktop-file-utils) spit out: lugaru.desktop: error: value 1.1 for key Version in group Desktop Entry is not a known version Ah, right, I was reading the FD 1.1 *draft*, missing the hint in the word draft :) changed. lugaru.desktop and lugaru.menu: Please supply the full path to the binary or wrapper script like Exec=/usr/games/lugaru to avoid messing with users' PATH environment variable. Ok, I was going by the example here http://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/latest/apa.html which did not have this. I've changed Exec to use /usr/games/lugaru and TryExec to /usr/lib/games/lugaru/lugaru (the actual binary), I'm not sure if this makes perfect sense, but it made some to me. In lugaru-data debian/control says Section: contrib/games. I didn't notice any dependency or build-dependency on a package from the non-free section, so lugaru-data goes either into main or into non-free. Yeah, I noticed that before and it should already be changed. The -data package should be non-free (due to the non-revenue license). The binary package lugaru-data has a circular dependency on lugaru. It should be Enhances: lugaru. Oops, Changed. Cheers - Fuddl Thanks for reviewing! I've uploaded new packages to mentors with these changes. -- arand -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4def71d8.7000...@gmail.com
Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)
Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 14:57 +0300 schrieb Peter Pentchev: On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:10:48PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:06:59AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.5 of the package oss-compat, which I am adopting within the games team. (I believe this makes sense since the main users of the Open Sound System nowadays are old Linux games.) Looks like we've another case of duplicated work here: http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/oss-compat/news/20110608T100624Z.html Nope, not duplicated work; the changelog entry is identical to the one that Stephen Kitt worked on in the pkg-games Git repository: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-games/oss-compat.git;a=blob;f=debian/changelog;h=d8b7ea6d6b79bf5125ade0d8f775856d535b40ee;hb=HEAD (argh, yep, ugly URL - just the latest rev of the debian/changelog file in the pkg-games/oss-compat.git repository on Alioth Reborn) I'm not really sure why Fuddl reset the maintainer field when uploading; the usual practice is to set it to the Debian Games Team (as Stephen did) and, if necessary, put the uploader's name in the, well, Uploaders field :) Oops, did I break or change anything? If anything changed in the package it was unintentionally! Could sbuild or dpkg-buildpackage have tricked me to touch the Maintainer field? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)
Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 14:48 +0200 schrieb Bruno Kleinert: Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 14:57 +0300 schrieb Peter Pentchev: On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:10:48PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:06:59AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.5 of the package oss-compat, which I am adopting within the games team. (I believe this makes sense since the main users of the Open Sound System nowadays are old Linux games.) Looks like we've another case of duplicated work here: http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/oss-compat/news/20110608T100624Z.html Nope, not duplicated work; the changelog entry is identical to the one that Stephen Kitt worked on in the pkg-games Git repository: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-games/oss-compat.git;a=blob;f=debian/changelog;h=d8b7ea6d6b79bf5125ade0d8f775856d535b40ee;hb=HEAD (argh, yep, ugly URL - just the latest rev of the debian/changelog file in the pkg-games/oss-compat.git repository on Alioth Reborn) I'm not really sure why Fuddl reset the maintainer field when uploading; the usual practice is to set it to the Debian Games Team (as Stephen did) and, if necessary, put the uploader's name in the, well, Uploaders field :) Oops, did I break or change anything? If anything changed in the package it was unintentionally! Could sbuild or dpkg-buildpackage have tricked me to touch the Maintainer field? It seems as if sbuild exchanges the Maintainer field in the binary package. If I schroot into my build environment and use dpkg-buildpackage instead of sbuild the Maintainer field in the resulting binary package remains unchanged. Greetings - Fuddl signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 at 15:39:34 +0200, Bruno Kleinert wrote: It seems as if sbuild exchanges the Maintainer field in the binary package. If I schroot into my build environment and use dpkg-buildpackage instead of sbuild the Maintainer field in the resulting binary package remains unchanged. When sbuild is behaving like a maintainer or sponsor (as opposed to behaving like a buildd) make sure you leave $maintainer_name and $uploader_name unset, assuming your sbuild is recent. In older versions of sbuild, which insisted on having at least one of $maintainer_name, $uploader_name or $key_id, it was necessary to set $key_id, and also set $pgp_options so that $key_id wasn't used (assuming you want to test the package before signing it): see http://www.pseudorandom.co.uk/2008/sbuild-dm/. That page also indicates how to check the .changes file for a sponsored upload to check that the right things happened. S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110608135501.ga27...@reptile.pseudorandom.co.uk
Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)
Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 14:55 +0100 schrieb Simon McVittie: On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 at 15:39:34 +0200, Bruno Kleinert wrote: It seems as if sbuild exchanges the Maintainer field in the binary package. If I schroot into my build environment and use dpkg-buildpackage instead of sbuild the Maintainer field in the resulting binary package remains unchanged. When sbuild is behaving like a maintainer or sponsor (as opposed to behaving like a buildd) make sure you leave $maintainer_name and $uploader_name unset, assuming your sbuild is recent. *Argh* $uploader_name was set in my .sbuildrc. Many thanks for pointing this out, Simon! In older versions of sbuild, which insisted on having at least one of $maintainer_name, $uploader_name or $key_id, it was necessary to set $key_id, and also set $pgp_options so that $key_id wasn't used (assuming you want to test the package before signing it): see http://www.pseudorandom.co.uk/2008/sbuild-dm/. That page also indicates how to check the .changes file for a sponsored upload to check that the right things happened. Bookmarked! :) What's the best practice to fix things up? Should I bump the debian revision of the package and re-upload it? I don't want to be blamed for hijacking packages by accident ;) Greetings - Fuddl signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 04:22:13PM +0200, Bruno Kleinert wrote: What's the best practice to fix things up? Should I bump the debian revision of the package and re-upload it? I don't want to be blamed for hijacking packages by accident ;) No hard feelings ;-) It's a native package, so I suppose either incrementing it to 0.0.6 or something like 0.0.5+fix would work... Regards, Stephen signature.asc Description: Digital signature
RFS: freeplane (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.3-1 of my package freeplane. It builds these binary packages: freeplane - Java program to create and edit mind maps. libjortho-freeplane-java - Java spell-checking library. The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 626187 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/freeplane - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/freeplane/freeplane_1.1.3-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Eric Lavarde PS: Lintian currently complains about the class-path manifest, but we agreed on the Debian Java list that this is a special case (due to OSGi specifics) that Lintian might be able to catch in the future. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4def8e0b.8030...@zorglub.s.bawue.de
Re: RFS: RHash - Utility for computing hash sums and magnet links
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Alexey, On 08.06.2011 11:55, rhash.admin wrote: Hello! I need a sponsor for the rhash package! http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=rhash a few notes about your package you may want to consider (I'm no DD, so I can't sponsor you though): * debian/changelog: Please don't explain in the changelog what your package is for. We have a short and a long description for that. See [1] for some hints. You should neither mention the SONAME change there unless you changed it for the Debian package exclusively. If the latter you might want to elaborate the reason in a README.Debian file. * Please push debhelper compatibility to version 8 (debian/compat, debian/control), see debhelper(7). * debian/control: It is considered a best practice to have VCS links in debian/control which point to the repository where you develop the Debian package. See [2]. * Do you really need the minor version in the SONAME (and hence correctly reflected in the package name)? It is not wrong to do so, but since your package is new and your both, major and minor version are 0 you could probably just use the major version instead of an odd name like librhash0.0. * You replicate the package priority for your binary packages when compared to the source package in debian/control. No need for that unless you change priorities for binary packages. * I'm not sure what I should think about debian/Makefile-rhash-1.2.6rc1. Why didn't you merge those changes with your upstream Makefile, since you are upstream yourself? If you really want to keep it out of your upstream source, please use a quilt patch [3] instead. * Your upstream sources are missing copyright headers. Please consider adding them. * You could earn some bonus points for shipping a symbol file, see dpkg-gensymbols(1) * Your package synopsis should not start with an upper case letter, see [4]. Long description is fine, but I'm not entirely happy with the synopsis lines for each package. Tastes may vary. * Your debian/copyright provides conflicting license headers. I'm aware yor package is dual-licensed, see DEP-5 on how to specify such use cases, Syntax in [5]. Also consider the MIT hint mentioned in DEP-5. Moreover don't use hash marks like programming style comments, use the Comment header instead. * You ship some cryptographic algorithms, I hope you checked all legal issues with that? [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-debian-changelog [2] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-vcs [3] http://wiki.debian.org/UsingQuilt, among others [4] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-desc-basics [5] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJN8ANxAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtDugP/2Ytoi0rmN529vJaMSFT6LrR 4aFIK2OD1VTUmHg9vdlWkUnqdq9DdSxJte6b4pl1gyjGMHrg6kK7fk758QQexNBd xLmHiC2+cPCnC/Hhh4BJovViZzYm37p8E3uarzWhp81hzyrK8OrvhPppkb4M50wn n0+hVrSYRvVmEn3lI/YR7meQXaysK4HFNfogICCPJvUadJKJJqTmdPG/zzf1h1dq n2AqNrgnpZlZeSsPQEFvquSV94vpqyU+XdEZNTxdO6GHzQq6wD5lrG/Y8PiSBv5z LxvcAwmO6Owd5QXO4JFtGn1kneMgVDn9kK9PeESO79niAY2AbjGWRp4P0UccIgI+ yZ7woE7f9x4BcdVcZtk3lmtfdCZZspuPUwKeBDIpMRXQgjAqT7+4lUDW7g9DMmwa LnST9L+0XzG2s9EANNfVyL5wJKHXe5eioq0U2TQ8ShCZCtfhn6smYcrR04wRKHnH wJb1LYsPH3ygJGmEtEbBga0H+9+aY3zr7ZoM3hjI1veqna+N8SQ5YXrr34sYPNyz Ji1r4KQ5Mjewq85fvM/VLAlXKebdZ34FAqPrazCQHVuZzMRtVPqgFpcVi336S3n3 KDIl5IpcrBabmf05APOmhkIzqXjReyihFNqUWQjXm+gFUJjhyM6kTZhm+Wx4eFyS Yx3EkSvBItEw6A/QXicB =xfL6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4df00371.8000...@toell.net
