Re: RFS: mgen
Hi Kilian, thanks very much for your detailed explanations. They cleared some things up that I had misunderstood. I've rebuilt from scratch with latest debhelper and uploaded to mentors. Would you mind taking another look and telling me if it's technically ok now? On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 10:50:22PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote: Regarding this upstream license you received by email I wonder whether the third paragraph is entirely DFSG-free. Have you asked for recommendations at debian-legal? Or is this license already used by any other package in Debian? I don't think this license has been used before, I'll ask on debian-legal if the license qualifies for distribution in Debian. Thanks again very much for your help! Raoul smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: RFS: icecat
Vincent Cheng wrote: Please run lintian on your package (lintian -iI --pedantic *.changes) and fix the numerous issues first. Many of them can easily be fixed (e.g. dh-make-template-in-source - if you don't need those templates provided by dh-make, just remove them), and you should aim for a lintian-clean package before sending out your RFS request. While you're at it, please consider providing a DEP-5 formatted debian/copyright [1], and include a debian/watch file as well. Ok, I'm working on this now. Also, I'm not sure if you've taken a look at bug #522196 [2] yet (I'm guessing you haven't, otherwise you wouldn't have filed a new ITP for Icecat); are you willing to maintain Icecat and to backport patches and fix security issues for all versions of Icecat in Debian, including future stable/oldstable releases? This can and will be a large amount of work for a package like Icecat, although a lot of the security-related work you'll have to do will have already been done by the Iceweasel maintainers. I searched icecat in www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ and wnpp.debian.net/ and found nothing. Now, I know why :-) Yes, it's a lot of work, and I'll try to do it the best possible. Thanks for all. -- Javier Sancho Fernández - http://www.jsancho.org/ Associate Member of the Free Software Foundation - http://www.fsf.org/ Contra el DRM - http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caph5tqed9phwpa8-6ds4vo5ddrbtjkvte2e+eonlrvttw1s...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: icecat
Andrew O. Shadoura wrote: i) What's the point of it, how is it different from Iceweasel? The goal of the IceCat project is to provide a completely free version of the popular Mozilla source code. It is (so far the only) part of Gnuzilla, the umbrella project analogous to Mozilla. The base Mozilla code is free but it supports and suggests using non-free plugins and other modules. GNU IceCat is completely free, and suggests only free plugins to users. ii) Why doesn't your package use pre-existing XULRunner in Debian? I've compiled Icecat with its own xulrunner version, but I can try to compile it for sid version. -- Javier Sancho Fernández - http://www.jsancho.org/ Associate Member of the Free Software Foundation - http://www.fsf.org/ Contra el DRM - http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAPH5TQHgv6fdwuvV5oVAGk=jA2=u1qtn6iabfawy856sm3n...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: news (News - RSS Ticker)
On 08/20/2011 02:40 AM, Russ Allbery wrote: I think you need to use a bit less generic of a name than that. (Like, for instance, news-rss-ticker, which would be a fine name). Thank you. I've been looking for a not-too-long, easy-to-remember name for binary/command, so (it may be a silly question) can package name and binary name be different - package name: 'news-rss-ticker' and binary/command: 'news'? Or 'newsrt', 'nrt', 'nrticker', 'inews', 'i-news', 'gnews', ...? -- Emmanuel Thomas-Maurin manutm...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e4f78ea.8070...@gmail.com
Re: RFS: news (News - RSS Ticker)
On 08/20/2011 02:37 AM, Vincent Cheng wrote: I'm not a DD so I can't sponsor your package, but I hope that the following comments and suggestions can help you improve your package. Thank you. I'm working on fixing all these issues. -- Emmanuel Thomas-Maurin manutm...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e4f7996.4050...@gmail.com
Re: RFS: news (News - RSS Ticker)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 20.08.2011 11:05, Emmanuel Thomas-Maurin wrote: Thank you. I've been looking for a not-too-long, easy-to-remember name for binary/command, so (it may be a silly question) can package name and binary name be different - package name: 'news-rss-ticker' and binary/command: 'news'? yes, that's certainly possible, although we as distributor tend to refrain from such changes and let upstream decide how to call their programs. As you are upstream yourself, you might be able just to rename it. The problem with /usr/bin/news is its generic name in a globally shared name space. In fact there is a already /usr/bin/news in the package sysnews making yours providing it as well a policy violation. Please see Debian policy § 10.1 [1] in general and examples like [2][3] for a little more background. [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-binaries [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/02/msg1.html [3] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611698 - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOT3rDAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNttGkQAKBsTl9hD10hfr/yW7153sdQ v06Ne4Y56gjNO69/7Ebg4jLzzryec7dUwr02E0C3jaGD/K+kY7W2CpU7nmi6KJdN PMh7S+Yz1090oCfc93aCR7wz3Ni44JpiPPmiMKTVy8J+eL8MpAIWMrddECELYJtr tpEYrmisf7Q4HpVTgoQFpnbszOGBKnmecb7bYScqkjUiVpMH/bVp7ibXcbh5sc4a wDQU3BGsFitwLq/FOleQSYyFacqaHZmrZza2mwSMUHw8uxm7vFhzyjFqwkl8E0cF maO4gE89bBD1BlR4dHSsOOZXWX7dYtD1c/gFpjDlZkHFXlBGdyWLaGlmJzhdmjXk S9XUf6dCVyuhUS5bMgT7TC5bKqkR+jOWsbCxsCwjga3bUitI4ZGhDfetaT29qYEA 7lilFaA4pxrZn0pNIId+VsQm0St5i9zYAZQe3s5kFO5nTQlhL0OBCElwcel/JTcw cQaQLn5D0P3QPh8ODUN5WDzFyAqD6NeOGaGHtDMkiDyJY03QfObdsywd3JZfc2vq YYLZNafs/+nYE0tuEbD/Q/mIIiGK4X+iGUJzu11yHcIXg7IA7hg5psIhNKqs5BRY Dvtki5eFiH2ENlHpRrhs5JC2FksAJqjo69gF4jtUK2noKFiycW3ox2+BALFBlpEf Xg1Fhvvp6lnQ6Y99tri4 =a2Ia -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e4f7ac4.8050...@toell.net
Re: RFS: icecat
Hello, On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:11:10 +0200 Javier Sancho j...@jsancho.org wrote: Andrew O. Shadoura wrote: i) What's the point of it, how is it different from Iceweasel? The goal of the IceCat project is to provide a completely free version of the popular Mozilla source code. Iceweasel is already free, isn't it? It is (so far the only) part of Gnuzilla, the umbrella project analogous to Mozilla. The base Mozilla code is free but it supports and suggests using non-free plugins and other modules. GNU IceCat is completely free, and suggests only free plugins to users. It's not about freedom, it's about limiting it for the users. Users must be free to install non-free extensions and plug-ins if they want to. -- WBR, Andrew signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: news (News - RSS Ticker)
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 11:05:46AM +0200, Emmanuel Thomas-Maurin wrote: On 08/20/2011 02:40 AM, Russ Allbery wrote: I think you need to use a bit less generic of a name than that. (Like, for instance, news-rss-ticker, which would be a fine name). Thank you. I've been looking for a not-too-long, easy-to-remember name for binary/command, so (it may be a silly question) can package name and binary name be different - package name: 'news-rss-ticker' and binary/command: 'news'? Or 'newsrt', 'nrt', 'nrticker', 'inews', 'i-news', 'gnews', ...? inews and gnews already exist ... Nick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110820095528.ga18...@leverton.org
Re: Bug#638554: ITP: news -- GTK-based highly configurable RSS Ticker
On 08/20/2011 01:25 PM, Neil Williams wrote: It's GTK, so presumably it's going to have a .desktop file and won't be launched from the command line, typically. The length of the name of the executable does not, therefore, need to be short. Use the source package name as the binary package name and the command. Yes, few users will launch it from command line although all parameters can be set from cli as well. So, thanks, I will use the same name for source/binary package and command. I still have to decide between 'news-rss-ticker' and 'i-news' and your opinions are welcome... :) -- Emmanuel Thomas-Maurin manutm...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e4fa485.9030...@gmail.com
RFS: fizsh
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package fizsh. * Package name: fizsh Version : 1.0.2-1 Upstream Author : Guido van Steen (myself) * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/fizsh/ * License : Modified BSD License Section : shells To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/fizsh Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fizsh/fizsh_1.0.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Guido van Steen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAMtVZ+sUFbfU4V2P=mA=5=uka9pt4oavmy+xemazlqan+bw...@mail.gmail.com
RFS: pysolfc (replacement for removed package: pysol)
Hello mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package pysolfc. * Package name: pysolfc Version : 2.0-1 * URL : http://pysolfc.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL * Programming Lang: Python * Description : A Python solitaire game collection It builds the binary package: pysolfc To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/pysolfc Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pysolfc/pysolfc_2.0-1.dsc The package appears to be lintian and pbuilder clean. A previous version has already been included in Ubuntu. The upload would fix this bug: 519752 My motivation for maintaining this package is: Its (unmaintained) predecessor pysol dropped out of debian a while ago; pysolfc is considered one of the best versatile solitaire collections. It is already part of Ubuntu, but I'd rather maintain it via Debian. Other relevant location(s): - Git: git://git.debian.org/git/pkg-games/pysolfc.git - Git-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-games/pysolfc.git I would be glad if someone sponsored this package for me. I've also prepared a transitional package pysol, found at: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/pysol - dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pysol/pysol_10.dsc There are also supplementary cardsets packages in the following locations which I'd glady see reviewed: pysolfc-cardsets: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/pysolfc-cardsets - dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pysolfc-cardsets/pysolfc-cardsets_2.0+dfsg-1.dsc - Git: git://git.debian.org/git/pkg-games/pysolfc-cardsets.git - Git-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-games/pysolfc-cardsets.git pysol-cardsets (transitional): - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/pysol-cardsets - dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pysol-cardsets/pysol-cardsets_10.dsc Kind regards, Bernhard PS: Please CC me when replying to this message! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Package for OpenAxiom
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:45:44 +0400, Игорь Пашев pashev.i...@gmail.com wrote: I have prepared packages for OpenAxiom: https://github.com/ip1981/open-axiom-debian It would help lazy/busy reviewers if you would provide either a source package uploaded to mentors.debian.net or a git repo that makes it easier to build a source package (i.e. has a branch where dpkg-buildpackage -S works). I have redirected followups to debian-mentors, where you are more likely to find help. All the best, d -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87zkj4jf4d.fsf@zancas.localnet
Re: Bug#638554: ITP: news -- GTK-based highly configurable RSS Ticker
I will go for 'i-news' and fix lintian issues. Meanwhile, if someboby thinks of a better name, please just let me know. ;) Thanks. -- Emmanuel Thomas-Maurin manutm...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e4fdaac.5000...@gmail.com
Re: RFS: fizsh
Dear mentors, I would like to provide some more information on FIZSH: FIZSH is intended to be an easy front-end to ZSH, so that it can serve as a first shell for starting developers and UNIX lovers. Many of them are drawn to BASH, because it is the default shell on many systems. Some may try ZSH, but they may give up after they see the message You are seeing this message because you have no zsh startup files. FIZSH is meant to give such people an easier start. It provides a similar interface as FISH, which aims to be an easy shell as well (http://fishshell.com). Like FISH, FIZSH provides syntax-highlighting and an intuitively appealing history-search widget. These widgets are maintained at https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh-syntax-highlighting and https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh-history-substring-search, respectively. (I am a major contributor to the FIZSH's history-search widget.) Unlike FISH, FIZSH accepts Bourne compatible syntax. It inherits this feature from ZSH. This enables users of FIZSH to use many snippets from the internet. This feature of snippets in Bourne compatible syntax is not available to people who use FISH. My intention for writing FIZSH, is definitely not to provide an competitor to ZSH. The goal of FIZSH is to make life easier for people who have not yet managed to tweak their ZSH configuration. These people may later migrate to ZSH, and add FIZSH's and possibly other useful ZSH features to their startup scripts. Also, note that the FIZSH package does not at all interfere with files installed by ZSH. FIZSH deploys its own configuration files. So it will never mess up someone's existing ZSH configuration. The uploaded package is more or less lintian clean. There is one message about hyphens in the man page. It says they might be intended as minus signs. However, the hyphens used are intended to be actual hyphens. I will clarify this by using \(hy in the next release upstream. Best wishes, Guido van Steen On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Guido van Steen vanst...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package fizsh. * Package name : fizsh Version : 1.0.2-1 Upstream Author : Guido van Steen (myself) * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/fizsh/ * License : Modified BSD License Section : shells To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/fizsh Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fizsh/fizsh_1.0.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Guido van Steen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAMtVZ+viRHA0vwNCNTrr9bKsfEvyy8ZZh94c51Ar2k=d+n9...@mail.gmail.com
RFS: amavisd-milter
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package amavisd-milter. * Package name: amavisd-milter Version : 1.5.0-4 Upstream Author : Petr Rehor r...@rx.cz * URL : http://amavisd-milter.sourceforge.net/ * License : BSD-like Section : mail To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/amavisd-milter Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/amavisd-milter/amavisd-milter_1.5.0-4.dsc Further information for potential sponsors: * package builds correct and clean according to: pbuilder --build --configfile pbuilderrc-i386-sid.config --twice amavisd-milter_1.5.0-4.dsc qemubuilder --build --configfile qemubuilderrc-amd64-sid.config amavisd-milter_1.5.0-4.dsc * package is clean according to: lintian --show-overrides -E -I --pedantic amavisd-milter_1.5.0-4_i386.changes * copyright is DEP-5, at revision 173 and clean according to: config-edit -application dpkg-copyright -ui none * patches are DEP-3 * software is running since 5 days on a backup production server without any problems The following warnings will be seen while building the package: configure: WARNING: Unrecognized options: --disable-maintainer-mode * AM_MAINTAINER_MODE in configue.ac was commented out by the upstream maintainer for the following reason: http://www.gnu.org/s/hello/manual/automake/maintainer_002dmode.html amavisd-milter/aclocal/missing: line 54: aclocal-1.10: command not found WARNING: `aclocal-1.10' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified `acinclude.m4' or `configure.ac'. You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. amavisd-milter/aclocal/missing: line 54: automake-1.10: command not found WARNING: `automake-1.10' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified `Makefile.am', `acinclude.m4' or `configure.ac'. You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. amavisd-milter/aclocal/missing: line 54: autoconf: command not found WARNING: `autoconf' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified `configure.ac'. You might want to install the `Autoconf' and `GNU m4' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. amavisd-milter/aclocal/missing: line 54: autoheader: command not found WARNING: `autoheader' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified `acconfig.h' or `configure.ac'. You might want to install the `Autoconf' and `GNU m4' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. * These warnings presumably result from patching configure and/or aclocal/ax_path_milter.m4 and are only present during the first build, subsequent builds do not show these problems. Attached to this mail you will find a: debdiff amavisd-milter_1.5.0-3.dsc amavisd-milter_1.5.0-4.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Harald Jenny diff -Nru amavisd-milter-1.5.0/debian/changelog amavisd-milter-1.5.0/debian/changelog --- amavisd-milter-1.5.0/debian/changelog 2011-06-08 23:14:46.0 +0200 +++ amavisd-milter-1.5.0/debian/changelog 2011-08-15 19:15:06.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,21 @@ +amavisd-milter (1.5.0-4) unstable; urgency=low + + * debian/control: +- Bumped Standards to 3.9.2 (no changes needed). +- Changed Vcs-* fields as package is now maintained in a git repository + (thanks to Alexander Wirt for the conversion from mercurial). +- Changed build depedency on debhelper to = 8 for easier backporting + to Lenny. + * debian/changelog: +- Fixed small word duplication error. + * debian/rules: +- Modified inclusion method of HARDENING_CFLAGS and HARDENING_LDFLAGS + from hardening-includes package to avoid duplication of these params. +- Stopped unnecessary linking of amavisd-milter binary by adding + -Wl,--as-needed to LDFLAGS. + + -- Harald Jenny har...@a-little-linux-box.at Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:11:03 +0200 + amavisd-milter (1.5.0-3) unstable; urgency=low * debian/changelog: @@ -47,7 +65,7 @@ Dumont for the libconfig-model-perl parser). - Changed license for debian packaging to match the one used by upstream simplifying patch exchange (thanks to Paul Wise and Charles Plessy for - the the valuable help). + the valuable help). -- Harald Jenny har...@a-little-linux-box.at Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:38:07 +0200 diff -Nru amavisd-milter-1.5.0/debian/control amavisd-milter-1.5.0/debian/control --- amavisd-milter-1.5.0/debian/control 2011-06-08 23:14:46.0 +0200 +++ amavisd-milter-1.5.0/debian/control 2011-08-15 19:15:06.0 +0200 @@ -2,11 +2,11 @@
Re: RFS: assimp (2nd try)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/19/2011 10:23 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* IOhannes zmölnig zmoel...@iem.at, 2011-08-19, 20:03:
here is my second attempt to find a sponsor (or more reviewers) for my
package assimp.
thanks for looking at the package again!
Was debian/TODO supposed to be included in the source package? :)
i like to keep that in git, to keep it attached to the packaging
process, but of course it is not strictly necessary to be in the
source package :-)
libassimp2.symbols:
has now demangled symbols for the C++, and normal symbols for C
The package FTBFS on amd64 due to symbol differences. Tail of the build
log attached.
thanks a lot for that!
argh to those templates!! i fear that this will give me long thoughts...
python:
strict dependency between python-pyassimp and libassimp2
fixed dylib loading mechanism as proposed by jakub
removed extranous printout to stdout
Some nitpicking regarding pyassimp/helper.py:
- You import ctypes.util but it's not used anywhere.
true, a leftover.
- In search_library you seem to define strerrno variable, but it isn't
used anywhere.
that's where you see that i looked at other code how it was done.
some more nitpicking on my own code:
my patch adds commented out code (basically replacing my original
find_library('assimp') call by a hardcoded libassimp.so.2.
how bad is this considered, style-wise?
mfgasdr
IOhannes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk5P/5AACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvSLXwCgp4bqyAp4U+8CaC32pclA4B1d
1Q8An1AED3Ox4Y8mHSXobMxow2BzSG6o
=9+4B
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e4fff93.1090...@iem.at
Re: RFS: amavisd-milter
Dear mentors,
sorry but wrong debdiff attached - here ist the correct version.
Kind regards,
Harald Jenny
diff -Nru amavisd-milter-1.5.0/debian/changelog
amavisd-milter-1.5.0/debian/changelog
--- amavisd-milter-1.5.0/debian/changelog 2011-03-28 22:38:19.0
+0200
+++ amavisd-milter-1.5.0/debian/changelog 2011-08-15 19:15:06.0
+0200
@@ -1,3 +1,21 @@
+amavisd-milter (1.5.0-4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * debian/control:
+- Bumped Standards to 3.9.2 (no changes needed).
+- Changed Vcs-* fields as package is now maintained in a git repository
+ (thanks to Alexander Wirt for the conversion from mercurial).
+- Changed build depedency on debhelper to = 8 for easier backporting
+ to Lenny.
+ * debian/changelog:
+- Fixed small word duplication error.
+ * debian/rules:
+- Modified inclusion method of HARDENING_CFLAGS and HARDENING_LDFLAGS
+ from hardening-includes package to avoid duplication of these params.
+- Stopped unnecessary linking of amavisd-milter binary by adding
+ -Wl,--as-needed to LDFLAGS.
+
+ -- Harald Jenny har...@a-little-linux-box.at Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:11:03
+0200
+
amavisd-milter (1.5.0-3) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/changelog:
@@ -47,7 +65,7 @@
Dumont for the libconfig-model-perl parser).
- Changed license for debian packaging to match the one used by upstream
simplifying patch exchange (thanks to Paul Wise and Charles Plessy for
- the the valuable help).
+ the valuable help).
-- Harald Jenny har...@a-little-linux-box.at Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:38:07
+0200
diff -Nru amavisd-milter-1.5.0/debian/control
amavisd-milter-1.5.0/debian/control
--- amavisd-milter-1.5.0/debian/control 2011-01-26 07:02:55.0 +0100
+++ amavisd-milter-1.5.0/debian/control 2011-08-15 19:15:06.0 +0200
@@ -2,11 +2,11 @@
Section: mail
Priority: extra
Maintainer: Harald Jenny har...@a-little-linux-box.at
-Build-Depends: debhelper (= 8.0.0), autotools-dev (= 20100122.1),
libmilter-dev, hardening-includes
+Build-Depends: debhelper (= 8), autotools-dev (= 20100122.1), libmilter-dev,
hardening-includes
Homepage: http://amavisd-milter.sourceforge.net/
-Vcs-Browser: http://hg.debian.org/hg/amavisd-new/amavisd-milter
-Vcs-Hg: http://hg.debian.org/hg/amavisd-new/amavisd-milter
-Standards-Version: 3.9.1
+Vcs-Browser:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=amavisd-new/pkg-amavisd-milter.git
+Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/amavisd-new/pkg-amavisd-milter.git
+Standards-Version: 3.9.2
Package: amavisd-milter
Architecture: any
diff -Nru amavisd-milter-1.5.0/debian/rules amavisd-milter-1.5.0/debian/rules
--- amavisd-milter-1.5.0/debian/rules 2011-01-26 05:49:05.0 +0100
+++ amavisd-milter-1.5.0/debian/rules 2011-08-15 19:15:06.0 +0200
@@ -1,8 +1,7 @@
#!/usr/bin/make -f
include /usr/share/hardening-includes/hardening.make
-CFLAGS += $(HARDENING_CFLAGS)
-LDFLAGS += $(HARDENING_LDFLAGS)
+EXTRA_LDFLAGS=-Wl,--as-needed
%:
dh $@ --with autotools_dev
@@ -11,7 +10,8 @@
dh_auto_configure -- --prefix=/usr --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man \
--sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var/lib/amavis \
--with-working-dir=/var/lib/amavis/tmp \
- CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) LDFLAGS=$(LDFLAGS)
+ CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) $(HARDENING_CFLAGS) \
+ LDFLAGS=$(LDFLAGS) $(HARDENING_LDFLAGS) $(EXTRA_LDFLAGS)
override_dh_auto_install:
dh_auto_install --destdir=debian/amavisd-milter
RFS: lucene3
Hello mentors! I am looking for a sponsor for my package lucene3. * Package name: lucene3 Version : 3.3.0+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : The Apache Software Foundation * URL : http://lucene.apache.org/java/ * License : Apache 2 Section : java To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/lucene3 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lucene3/lucene3_3.3.0+dfsg-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. This package is an incompatible upgrade from the existing lucene2 package, though it was built from scratch rather than updating the original package. The .changes and .deb files all pass lintian -iI --pedantic cleanly. Kind regards, Mat Scales -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CACv6Rzv9G6FV_O5g0tecMGrCPa8+HuOtW+U=jvwtwu+a20b...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: lucene3
Le dimanche 21 août 2011 00:57:31, Mat Scales a écrit : Hello mentors! Hi Matt, I am looking for a sponsor for my package lucene3. [...] You should try to contact directly Debian Java Team on debian-jav@l.d.o for Java sponsoring. This package is an incompatible upgrade from the existing lucene2 package, though it was built from scratch rather than updating the original package. The .changes and .deb files all pass lintian -iI --pedantic cleanly. Why is your package not based on initial work done by Jan-Pascal van Best ? svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/trunk/lucene3 Regards, -- Damien signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: RFS: lucene3
[Forwarded due to not hitting Reply to all] Hi Damien, thanks for your time. You should try to contact directly Debian Java Team on debian-jav@l.d.o for Java sponsoring. Ah, thanks, I will! Why is your package not based on initial work done by Jan-Pascal van Best ? svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/trunk/lucene3 My first reason was that when I saw that Jan-Pascal had done some packaging work I went to see what he had done - and the code was gone! I now know that this was actually because of a problem with anonscm.debian.org/viewvc, but it meant that I started my own work assuming that Jan-Pascal had removed his when he dropped his ITP. Secondly, when I did find Jan-Pascal's work I noticed that he was packaging upstream version 3.0.2 (from June 2010) while I had been working on version 3.3.0 (from July 2011). Most of the work needed redoing as there have been a lot of changes upstream in between. I have done a thorough examination of Jan-Pascal's packaging, however, and noted anything that my package is missing. There wasn't a lot but what there was no longer cleanly applies so they have become TODO items. Most of the rest is simply not relevant any more. Finally, I admit, there is a certain amount of personal taste involved. Jan-Pascal's solution is quite a complicated CDBS affair that doesn't reflect current policy because it is a direct increment of a package that has been maintained for 6 years, while my own is a pretty simple pure debhelper package that is quite clean. A new maintainer of a new package seems like the perfect opportunity to bring the package up to date. Phew, I'm not sure any one expected such a long answer, even me :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cacv6rztsdsdziiehto4xkn95u8bbpvxto9y-a4mzsp4kbg1...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: amavisd-milter
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 20:44:55 +0200, Harald Jenny wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package amavisd-milter. Uploaded. /* Side note: Your detailed mail convinced me to look at the package, and the package itself also shows great diligence. Thanks! */ Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - PGP/GPG key ID: 0x8649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `-NP: Tracy Chapman: Subcity signature.asc Description: Digital signature
RFS: espctag (update)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package espctag. * Package name: espctag Version : 0.2.2-2 Upstream Author : Jérôme SONRIER j...@emor3j.fr.eu.org * URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/espctag/ * License : GPL3+ Section : misc It builds these binary packages: espctag- ID666 tags editor The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 638474 To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/espctag Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/espctag/espctag_0.2.2-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards -- Jérôme SONRIER signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
RFS: libspctag (update)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libspctag. * Package name: libspctag Version : 0.1-2 Upstream Author : Jérôme SONRIER j...@emor3j.fr.eu.org * URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/libspctag/ * License : GPL3+ Section : libs It builds these binary packages: libspctag-dev - ID666 tags extraction support library (development headers) libspctag0 - ID666 tags extraction support library The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 638493 To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libspctag Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libs/libspctag/libspctag_0.1-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards -- Jérôme SONRIER signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: RFS: assimp
Le Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:22:00AM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl a écrit : So the order would be 1~dfsg 1 1+dfsg. You usually use ~ for smaller pre versions and similar, where you have 0.9pre1, and later a 0.9 which should be a higher version number. However, I can't think of a scenario, where ~dfsg makes sense. Hi all, When I remove some files from a source package, I sometimes use ~dfsg, in the case their copyright holder later relicenses them without Upstream making a new release. It is then possible to package the original upstream sources under their original version number. Have a nice Sunday, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110821043535.ga24...@merveille.plessy.net
