RFS: kboot-utils (resend) -- needed for d-i to complete on PS3
Hi Debian Mentors and Debian PPCers, I am looking for a sponsor for my package kboot-utils, it is needed to make debian-installer complete a successful installation on PlayStation3. I am also the upstream author. * Package name: kboot-utils Version : 0.2 Upstream Author : Antonio Ospite osp...@studenti.unina.it * URL : http://git.ao2.it/kboot-utils.git/ * License : GPLv3 Programming Lang: Posix shell Description: Helper tools to automatically generate a kboot.conf file from entries in /boot. The kboot.conf file can be read by the petitboot bootloader which is used for instance on the Sony PlayStation 3 in OtherOS mode in order to list kernels to boot. It builds the binary package: kboot-utils The package can be downloaded with dget using this command: dget -u http://ao2.it/debian/kboot-utils_0.2-1.dsc The source package can be found in the 'debian' branch at: http://git.ao2.it/kboot-utils.git/ The package has been tested with pbuilder, checked with lintian, verified to be piuparts-clean. As I was saying this package is needed to have a 100% working installation on the PlayStation3, for details look at Bug #619236: http://bugs.debian.org/619236 you can also read on the wiki that as for now kboot.conf needs to be created by hand: http://wiki.debian.org/PS3#Debian_installer The plan is to first have kboot-utils in the official archive and then make d-i install it when machine==PS3. Thanks, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite http://ao2.it PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001 A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? pgp0ZmQDS4521.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: ndppd
Section: unknown doesn't seem like a good choice. What about net
maybe?
Good plan, fixed.
The package description is intended for users that do *not* yet know
what your software is about. As such your short description should
explain that it is related to IPv6 and your long description should
also
cover more than two lines.
Fixed.
The Vcs-* fields in debian/control are supposed to contain locations
of
the Debian packaging, not the upstream source. I suggest that you
remove
them and put those urls in the documentation. The copyright file
might
be a good place.
Packaging is in that very repo, but in the debian branch.
Updated Vcs-Browser to point directly to that branch though.
On the copyright file: I encourage you to have a look at the
http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ copyright format. On the other hand
using this format is *not* required. (Some sponsors seem to require
it.)
Fixed, now dep5 format.
Why do you restrict the architectures of the binary package to i386
and
amd64? Please explain or fix.
Updated to linux-any, since ndppd is using features only
present in the linux kernel.
Your Standards-Version is out of date. Please always develop on
Debian
sid.
Fixed.
You mentioned a homepage in your email. Maybe you can add a Homepage
header in the source section of your debian/control?
Wasn't one already present? =) It is now anyway.
Your debian/init.d contains unreferenced cruft such as do_reload.
Maybe
you can clean it up a bit?
Fixed.
While we're at cleaning. Here's a quote from your debian/rules:
# Sample debian/rules that uses debhelper. Maybe you could shrink
that
one as well?
Fixed.
As you seem to be upstream as well I ask you to polish your upstream
Makefile as well. For instance honouring the $PREFIX environment
variable helps bsd systems with using your software. I'd envision
something like this:
PREFIX ?= /usr/local
MANDIR ?= ${PREFIX}/share/man
SBINDIR ?= ${PREFIX}/sbin
...
install:
mkdir -p ${DESTDIR}${SBINDIR} ${DESTDIR}${MANDIR}/man1
${DESTDIR}${MANDIR}/man5
This employs a number of differences to your old method. The $*DIR
variables now contain the final location of files. So if you ever
need
those locations to update configuration before installing, you can
then
use them. The use of $PREFIX allows installation to the traditional
/usr/local location. Furthermore setting those variables with ?=
allows
overriding them. The same applies to to CFLAGS and CC (which should
be
called CXXFLAGS and CXX) as well.
Fixed.
Thank you for the review, Helmut.
Much appreciated!
Regards,
Daniel Adolfsson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/dc055b6394c2b9ae07fdc65a87e12...@tuhox.com
RFS: ndppd (New Package; Closes #644932)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package ndppd. * Package name: ndppd Version : 0.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Daniel Adolfsson daniel.adolfs...@tuhox.com * URL : http://www.tuhox.com/ndppd/ * License : GPL-3+ Section : net Description: ndppd is a daemon that proxies certain IPv6 NDP messages between two or more interfaces. It currently supports proxying Neighbor Solicitation Messages and Neighbor Advertisement messages in order to allow IPv6 routing without relying on linux proxy_ndp. It builds those binary packages: ndppd - daemon that proxies IPv6 NDP messages To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/ndppd Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/ndppd/ndppd_0.2.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Daniel Adolfsson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/a1f10f1307fdc95279257c39e1e4d...@tuhox.com
Fwd: installing dependencies along with deb package
Hello. This is karunakar. I was developed one package. i want convert that package into deb package. i was created deb package with my source code. i got the error when i install that package. it saying this package needs apache2 package . how can i install dependencies which are mentioned in control file. i need to install all packages which are required and mentioned in control file at the time of deb package installation automatically . Regards karunakar Department of sanskrit studies, SHMT project, University of Hyderabad,hyd, 9491388035.
Re: Fwd: installing dependencies along with deb package
Hi! Am 11.10.2011 13:15, schrieb karunakar medamoni: This is karunakar. I was developed one package. i want convert that package into deb package. i was created deb package with my source code. i got the error when i install that package. it saying this package needs apache2 package . how can i install dependencies which are mentioned in control file. i need to install all packages which are required and mentioned in control file at the time of deb package installation automatically . Try debi from the devscripts package: are@pc2177:~$ debi --help|grep depends --with-dependsInstall packages with their depends. are@pc2177:~$ dpkg -S $(which debi) devscripts: /usr/bin/debi Best regards, Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e942bfb.2050...@debian.org
Re: Fwd: installing dependencies along with deb package
Hi Le 11/10/11 13:15, karunakar medamoni a écrit : Hello. This is karunakar. I was developed one package. i want convert that package into deb package. i was created deb package with my source code. i got the error when i install that package. it saying this package needs apache2 package . how can i install dependencies which are mentioned in control file. i need to install all packages which are required and mentioned in control file at the time of deb package installation automatically . aptitude -f install will install the dependencies of the packages you installed with dpkg -i. Example: dpkg -i my_own_package_1-1_i386.deb aptitude -f install Regards, Thibaut. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e942eb5.7000...@free.fr
Re: RFS: snes9x
* Michael Moorman tensorpud...@devio.us [111010 18:23]: I uploaded a new version of the package to mentors just now, which fixes the lintian warnings and other issues brought up with my first upload. It is at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/s/snes9x/snes9x_1.53-1.dsc Hello, here is a new review : The package still builds fine :) but a lintian warning is still around: I: snes9x-x: possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration (you need a snes9x.doc-base file) In debian/changelog, what do you mean by Removed or imported all old patches. : have they been applied upstream ? Your watchfile does not work (no matching hrefs). -- Etienne Millon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111011124301.gd4...@john.ssi.corp
not installing files...(with cdbs)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi, i was wondering, what is the best way to *exclude* files from a package that get installed by upstream's make install target? at the same time i don't want to miss the comforts of packaging systems like cdbs. e.g. upstream uses autotools as build system and installs LICENSE.txt (GPL2) into some non-standard location (pkglibdir). i would use a symlink to common-licenses. - - modifying the build system (exclude LICENSE.txt from the Makefile.am) seems a bit of an overkill. - - using debian/mypackage.install to move files from a temporary installdestination (debian/tmp/) to the the real one (debian/mypackage) this usually works well, but not so good if a given source package generates only a single binary package. this might be a problem with CDBS - - removing the files right after the install target. - - ??? the 2nd attempt seems to be most the most promising, but i seem to be unable to make it work. maybe i'm missing something, like debian/mypackage.noinstall... fgmasdr IOhannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6UM0YACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvR0twCgk315bvFd2eGdpFxNwj9vUnFS bnUAoNfTBG/c1+JJ+41QArDwRTWwKOaT =/NMK -END PGP SIGNATURE- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Fwd: installing dependencies along with deb package
Hi Thibaut, On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 01:55:33PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote: Hi Le 11/10/11 13:15, karunakar medamoni a ?crit : Hello. This is karunakar. I was developed one package. i want convert that package into deb package. i was created deb package with my source code. i got the error when i install that package. it saying this package needs apache2 package . how can i install dependencies which are mentioned in control file. i need to install all packages which are required and mentioned in control file at the time of deb package installation automatically . aptitude -f install IMO this is not good way, because conflicting packages will be removed too. But may be acceptable this time. As for me, good way is to install dependencies manually(using aptitude install depname or same for apt-get). will install the dependencies of the packages you installed with dpkg -i. Example: dpkg -i my_own_package_1-1_i386.deb aptitude -f install Regards, Thibaut. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e942eb5.7000...@free.fr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111011144427.ga24...@hode1.jet.kiev.ua
Re: Fwd: installing dependencies along with deb package
* Andriy Beregovenko j...@jet.kiev.ua [111011 16:52]: As for me, good way is to install dependencies manually(using aptitude install depname or same for apt-get). Note that if you do this, dependencies won't be marked as automatically installed and thus won't be removed when the first package is removed. -- Etienne Millon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111011145826.ge4...@john.ssi.corp
Re: Notes about mentors.debian.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Boris, On 10.10.2011 12:31, Boris Pek wrote: 1) Successfully uploaded packages are not deleted from mentors.debian.net as it was earlier. There is no even such option in account settings. So people should remove own packages manually. Not all need current functional for package reviewing... There is a setting. If you are logged in, you can remove a package by clicking on the Delete package link. 2) There is no any marker that a package was uploaded to the Debian in package details page. Such packages are being removed (again) in future. The code is already there [1]. 3) Some time ago it was very interesting field with counter in package details page. That counter was showing the number of downloads by potential sponsors. There is no such useful counter now. Was it something wrong with its algorithm? I didn't assume anyone would miss it. Apparently people do, so it may come back in future. Or, if you want, send me a patch enabling it. Unless I am mistaken we have some code tracking it already. PS: debexpo-devel mailing list looks like realy dead: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debexpo-devel/ http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debexpo-devel/2011-September/09.html Yes. My apologies. We might decide soon what to do with the mailing list to avoid any confusion. [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debexpo/debexpo.git;a=blob;f=debexpo/cronjobs/removeolduploads.py;h=e710b2b05f31f3ba72bd3221d1be9ef4828bcb5b;hb=refs/heads/devel - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOlGGYAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtLLUP/A+zued+tjePD6RhHjzE8SEv aF1bl9diDpDNkzSsvIwHHdyshIFNlwQQiXFfRERHWBmcjbDRHN/VFUIFlHXm3ki8 XGmzsBRHYiuvcYNxtnJ+DUpeCGnpATYNd4GMXbo4p9G4lLmEabQ4JDa3MeQgCTpA K7icqf2p84TCah/YhLl+2zq0skS0tGysmw1O1myEG12/k1oaIuks7O3/dz56goij vpGnZ9Y88pc/+fCNj73rUDByhoT+iO2t1/9NshCLCMzjXyFEuqvGZ76ztBhdq33s ftwYetA2rUy0E7hx79PdSzyTCoHD91Xp+DjpAhvn8jSMmR2RMH6P+tAyYjPNhfGS ktQWHrvY0MrFuqzvIeLTavWtLqzPKHBWFwITZ2sGAMcbeiknWQzIfPpKXtPY0SMO B+yBnCH599aCJWFx27lL+53p3T1YO3kb7k20U0qpCiEzlf8ryn8UET2R/wyGNaia w3SiydLqsbQ1P5o+RGJEL9M0JblSbUiQM0nGuBLcTLgOMBOQbCRPKn60f9BqEelc UQwc12ZGj7EB2VXzoY5Qq7H8cJb31DocWixbwJgUmWcmZ/tx0e7W6TdG2wNINfz1 7qVlWpsqXqrj4vTaPMUc3f/jf861wZww72NaQaxWI05jRhA5vHchO1JGUrEYwYDT /n8eeAdFc+HuyUOFLBA/ =uaXZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e946199.3010...@toell.net
Re: RFS: lacewing
Hi Helmut, thanks for taking a look. On 10/10/11 07:04, Helmut Grohne wrote: This is a nice upstream version number, but your Debian packaging needs a Debian revision. OK - I changed the version to 0.2.5-1 (and renamed the packages to `liblacewing`) :- http://mentors.debian.net/package/liblacewing dget -xhttp://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libl/liblacewing/liblacewing_0.2.5-1.dsc Are you aware that networking is a broad field? apt-cache search network lib gives me about 750 packages. There is plenty of room for improvement here. Especially when looking at the long description, which basically says nothing. True. I've extended the long description a little for now, and I'll see if I can think of something better to put there. You added a patch to your upstream README. 90% of the patch are useless boiler plate. Maybe you can explain your changes and clean that boiler plate? Your Standards-Version is out of date. Please always develop on Debian sid, so these mistakes do not happen. You would have found this problem had you run (sid) lintian on your package. Side note: Your debian/control file contains trailing whitespace. Your copyright file contains a link url://lacewing-project.org. I have never heared of a url protocol. Even though your copyright file clarifies the author of the Debian packaging, it does not explicitly state the license. While we're at it: You might want to have a look at the new copyright formathttp://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/. Note that using this format is *not* required. Thanks - I've resolved all of the above, and changed the copyright file to the dep5 format (the previous one was just whatever dephelper generated). Your debian/rules file also contains boiler plate such as # Sample debian/rules that uses debhelper. As far as I can see you do not install the examples from the examples directory into the -dev package. Why? I agree this would be useful - I'll probably add it to the upstream Makefile. James McLaughlin
Re: RFS: task-spooler
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 09:47:49PM -0300, David Bremner wrote: On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 00:39:07 +0400, Alexander Inyukhin shur...@sectorb.msk.ru wrote: * Package name: task-spooler Version : 0.7.0-1~rc1 Upstream Author : Lluís Batlle i Rossel vi...@vicerveza.homeunix.net * URL : http://vicerveza.homeunix.net/~viric/soft/ts/ * License : GPLv2+ Section : misc Hi Alexander; Hi David, thanks for your comments. I hope all these issues are solved in the latest release of the package. Thanks for working on task-spooler. I have used it before and found it pretty useful. Some comments - you miss Gentoo Foundation as copyright holder for the ebuild files - your version number is odd. If your package is ready for upload (in your opinion) it should have a version like 0.7.0-1 - I have a vague memory of this being discussed before, but I can't find the discussion now. As far as I can tell, there are several ways in which the socket setup could be improved. - I don't really understand why the permissions on /tmp/socket-ts.$uid are group and world readable. - having the socket in world writable location makes ts vulnerable to a denial of service attack. wouldn't it be better to put the socket in a mode 0700 directory e.g. in the users home directory? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111011184021.ga2...@shurick.s2s.msu.ru
Re: Fwd: installing dependencies along with deb package
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:58:26 +0200, Etienne Millon wrote: As for me, good way is to install dependencies manually(using aptitude install depname or same for apt-get). Note that if you do this, dependencies won't be marked as automatically installed and thus won't be removed when the first package is removed. That's why I like: aptitude install depname1+M depname2+M Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key ID: 0x8649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `-BOFH excuse #345: Having to manually track the satellite. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
RFR: devilspie2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi! (in this case - RFR = Request For Review - I am not sure if its a used/correct abbreviation) Could someone please check out my devilspie2 package? It is a continuation of the original Devilspie by Ross Burton, but with the major difference that the symbolic expressions of the original and their iterpreter are replaced by much simpler and easier maintainable LUA code. It is written in C, with a simple makefile as build system (My first try at a package using a Makefile, I have used cmake in the past) - and also using CDBS. I could (amongst other stuff) take some hints regarding the short/long descriptions. The package can be found here: http://mentors.debian.net/package/devilspie2 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/devilspie2/devilspie2_0.08-1.dsc and upstream is here: http://www.gusnan.se/devilspie2/ thanks in advance, and best regards /Andreas Rönnquist gus...@gusnan.se -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJOlLHpAAoJEBlLYxqy2iiIbnwP/jXQSxtYqeDXSvtxz8GipE25 M/gsPJd5bpe3pYTpTYkwP99eRg8vhkRzirMdKa+vL10IfA2hxOydSMYqJg2UxxKs Cm78H/iWcjU+eBUZ060q1m/Dyq7GVUKG73ZWhIwVAjwVXYoaQBuYhqkthj5WRmf+ glwy2kP8VzA8bbJ2qX8SFgzXF7oT/jdPxcTEiMNyBwL7du783zgkcshSNsOBG4zC 1FDaj1M3Tjnus87CvxpszZqRM5qCW0RQTkih41GnZ8qz3462aAZuReqjG5OLfb+b RTRwzF57ezzEMFmBS7HDAgI3epliAlr7JZQDIkZghTIomiCDZKzk4181YHVjev5l Clxm4lag77VsZFBXm8Mlu1o9TCaGrJokEcMA0qCV2DwbZttve9HIwb3lHy+edcjn 7C+Y9jnjZocRh13y7GeMNA4adG36ddWMOUikAC0tgeVAtDCO4HhW6Asa+KhWZehW 7JF68Qm1u4rDI/R0X9n+CYOsT9r0U4KcwL2wPdaPTORv/dvgtlKZDbRJDP6fnqoJ W/c3yvlSCFQ2edd9RnNU8b4+uXGa7Gam3nNWYdEFzWcvQ4343EuUbFrCzsxDARWw VB8lPmvrbFazjybKDSBvewO/1K2XWHjn+NpedcLb0dUOketaaPg8uYz/D0xHEH/3 wOhSaHFOoDft7uApkisn =FLx1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e94b1ec.6090...@gusnan.se
Re: Notes about mentors.debian.net
On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 10:32:41 AM Arno Töll wrote: Hello Boris, On 10.10.2011 12:31, Boris Pek wrote: 1) Successfully uploaded packages are not deleted from mentors.debian.net as it was earlier. There is no even such option in account settings. So people should remove own packages manually. Not all need current functional for package reviewing... There is a setting. If you are logged in, you can remove a package by clicking on the Delete package link. But how do I delete earlier versions without deleteing the most recent version? There is not a delete button for the individual versions. The package swe-standard-data is somewhat large, and I don't have a way of deleting the earlier versions w/o deleting everything. [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debexpo/debexpo.git;a=blob;f=debexpo/cr onjobs/removeolduploads.py;h=e710b2b05f31f3ba72bd3221d1be9ef4828bcb5b;hb=re fs/heads/devel -- Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096 pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
syntax-error-in-dep5-copyright syntax error in section 4 after the tag license
Hi, Could someone tell me what is wrong with my debian/copyright file. Lintian keeps giving me the following (recent) warning: W: fizsh source: syntax-error-in-dep5-copyright syntax error in section 4 after the tag license: Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:\n I have been amending the file but I still get this warning. This is the current debian/copyright file: Format: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?op=filerev=174 Upstream-Name: Fizsh Upstream-Contact: Guido van Steen vanst...@users.sourceforge.net Source: http://sourceforge.net/projects/fizsh/ Files: * Copyright: 2011, Guido van Steen vanst...@users.sourceforge.net License: BSD-3-clause~FIZSH Files: scripts/*highlighter* Copyright: 2010-2011, zsh-syntax-highlighting contributors License: BSD-3-clause~zsh-syntax-highlighting contributors Files: scripts/zsh-history-substring-search.zsh Copyright: 2009, Peter Stephenson p.w.stephen...@ntlworld.com 2011, Guido van Steen vanst...@users.sourceforge.net 2011, Suraj N. Kurapati sun...@gmail.com 2011, Sorin Ionescu sorin.ione...@gmail.com 2011, Vincent Guerci unknown @ unknown . unknown License: BSD-3-clause~FIZSH and BSD-3-clause~zsh-syntax-highlighting contributors License: BSD-3-clause~FIZSH Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. * Neither the name of FIZSH nor the names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission. THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS AS IS AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. License: BSD-3-clause~zsh-syntax-highlighting contributors Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. * Neither the name of the zsh-syntax-highlighting contributors nor the names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission. THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS AS IS AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/camtvz+t58exfhlf9az227gqrzd9zvqmmayzn1wa77c6n6hk...@mail.gmail.com
