Re: RFS: yubiserver (new package in Debian, 2nd try)
Hi, sorry for that. It needs automake package in the Build-Depends field. I will upload a new update in a few hours. Cheers, Chris. On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 06:41:33PM +0200, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yubiserver/yubiserver_0.1-1.dsc It doesn't build with pbuilder. Please see below. [...] dh_testdir # Add here commands to configure the package. ./configure --prefix=/ --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-default-sqlite3-db-file=/etc/yubiserver/yubiserver.sqlite --with-default-yubiserver-log-file=/var/log/yubiserver.log configure: error: cannot find install-sh, install.sh, or shtool in build-aux ./build-aux make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 E: Failed autobuilding of package -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/62788.194.177.215.120.1320828629.squir...@www.wired-net.gr
What to do if there's already a debian-dir inside the .orig.tar?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello! What shall I do, when there's already a debian-dir inside the .orig.tar, e.g. when upstream already package his/her program for ubuntu? Can I safely remove the existing debian-dir from the .orig.tar? What else can I do? BR, Björn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk66XYoACgkQ3u1SIc8s7PVd6QEAoZvOOq3/PVIXhfvuFc75qRCl TNMnVJ4YlVU/8VyZOqgBAKuhcDEX/y3PKzfXReLVt5sk+0DjiuKbl18M/85lvlYl =r5gF -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4eba5d8a.3040...@googlemail.com
Re: What to do if there's already a debian-dir inside the .orig.tar?
2011/11/9 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@googlemail.com: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello! What shall I do, when there's already a debian-dir inside the .orig.tar, e.g. when upstream already package his/her program for ubuntu? Can I safely remove the existing debian-dir from the .orig.tar? What else can I do? BR, Björn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk66XYoACgkQ3u1SIc8s7PVd6QEAoZvOOq3/PVIXhfvuFc75qRCl TNMnVJ4YlVU/8VyZOqgBAKuhcDEX/y3PKzfXReLVt5sk+0DjiuKbl18M/85lvlYl =r5gF -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4eba5d8a.3040...@googlemail.com You can simply ignore it; there's no need to repack the tarball just to remove the debian dir. dpkg-buildpackage (or your favourite wrapper) will remove the debian dir inside the original tarball and use yours at build time. Vincent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CACZd_tCsE1qRCVnQ_XqXGj7fTLbrVZe4fe=kzxbvr42_1me...@mail.gmail.com
Re: What to do if there's already a debian-dir inside the .orig.tar?
On 2011-11-09 12:01 +0100, Björn Esser wrote: What shall I do, when there's already a debian-dir inside the .orig.tar, e.g. when upstream already package his/her program for ubuntu? Replace the debian/ directory with your own version. Can I safely remove the existing debian-dir from the .orig.tar? When using source format 1.0, the only sane option is to repack the .orig.tar without the debian/ directory. If you use format 3.0 (quilt), this is not necessary. What else can I do? Use format 3.0 (quilt), and the debian/ directory in the .orig.tar will automatically be ignored. See the SOURCE PACKAGE FORMATS section in dpkg-source(1). Cheers, Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87sjlxfsml@turtle.gmx.de
Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Joey Parrish wrote: Well, the only data point I have is yui which works fine with 4.5. I don't know of any other packages in Debian which need flex-sdk yet. So I would wait to cross that bridge when we get to it. I need flex-sdk for jPlayer ( http://jplayer.org/ ), which is needed by witty 3.1.11+ -- Pau Garcia i Quiles http://www.elpauer.org (Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAKcBoktrmptVpsbjU3YLPRc-Jacf=oüpvufbytowmy_vp...@mail.gmail.com
Re: What to do if there's already a debian-dir inside the .orig.tar?
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 03:15:35AM -0800, Vincent Cheng wrote: You can simply ignore it; there's no need to repack the tarball just to remove the debian dir. dpkg-buildpackage (or your favourite wrapper) will remove the debian dir inside the original tarball and use yours at build time. This is true only for 3.0 (quilt) format. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Buildings fails due to missing link against gzclose
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 12:06:00PM +0100, Daniel Stender wrote: Info: the problem vanished when I've builded with other builders than pbuilder. pbuilder was created to be able to build in a controlled environment. No wonder that some errors are not present in uncontrolled environments, but that doesn't mean they do not exist at all. gummi-0.5.999-svn1032.tar.gz cannot be built on my sid system even without pbuilder. Thanks for the comment. Would you please try if it fails also with latest packet: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gummi/gummi_0.5.999-svn1045-1.dsc and would you send me build log if it fails again? It does, with the same error. gcc -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -pthread -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/gio-unix-2.0/ -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -pthread -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/gtksourceview-2.0 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/gio-unix-2.0/ -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -pthread -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/poppler/glib -I/usr/include/poppler -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/gio-unix-2.0/ -pthread -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/gtkspell-2.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/gio-unix-2.0/ -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -export-dynamic -Wall -O2 -DDATADIR=\/usr/share/gummi\ -DLOCALEDIR=\/usr/share/locale\ -g -O2 -Wl,--as-needed -o gummi biblio.o configfile.o editor.o environment.o texlive.o latexmk.o rubber.o gui-menu.o gui-tabmanager.o gui-import.o gui-main.o gui-prefs.o gui-preview.o gui-search.o gui-snippets.o gui-infoscreen.o gui-project.o synctex_parser.o synctex_parser_utils.o importer.o iofunctions.o external.o project.o latex.o motion.o signals.o snippets.o template.o update.o utils.o tabmanager.o main.o -lglib-2.0 -pthread -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgio-2.0 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lcairo -lpango-1.0 -lfreetype -lfontconfig -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lrt -lglib-2.0 -pthread -lgtksourceview-2.0 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgio-2.0 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lcairo -lpango-1.0 -lfreetype -lfontconfig -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lrt -lglib-2.0 -pthread -lpoppler-glib -lgdk-x11-2.0 -lpoppler -lpangocairo-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lgmodule-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lrt -lglib-2.0 -pthread -lgtkspell -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgio-2.0 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lcairo -lpango-1.0 -lfreetype -lfontconfig -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lrt -lglib-2.0 /usr/bin/ld: synctex_parser.o: undefined reference to symbol 'gzclose' /usr/bin/ld: note: 'gzclose' is defined in DSO /usr/lib/libz.so.1 so try adding it to the linker command line /usr/lib/libz.so.1: could not read symbols: Invalid operation collect2: ld returned 1 exit status There is still no -lz here. There is still nothing in src/Makefile.am that could add -lz to the link command. If it fails on your pbuilder with latest sid, why are you asking others to double-check this? It should be enough proof for you that the software is still not fixed. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
RFS: python-ipcalc [update]
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-ipcalc. * Package name: python-ipcalc Version : 0.3-2 Upstream Author : Wijnand Modderman wijn...@freecode.nl * URL : http://dev.tehmaze.com/projects/ipcalc http://us.generation-nt.com/redirect.html?url=VDsCc1MhB3BQP1UoDS0GYQBlAHBWfVclATdValtjDWAMcVU1AChbP1BqBDtdfQFyBnQNZAVqAmFTY1JxVXMBIlQ6AndTNgdhUGlVZA%3D%3D * License : MIT Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-ipcalc - perform IP subnet calculations To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-ipcalc Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-ipcalc/python-ipcalc_0.3-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, -- Ali MEZGANI *N*etwork *E*ngineering/*S*ecurity http://www.nativelabs.org/
RFS: mosh
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mosh. * Package name: mosh Version : 0.2.7+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Taro Minowa hige...@users.sourceforge.jp * URL : http://mosh.monaos.org/ * License : BSD-2-clause Section : lisp It builds those binary packages: mosh - fast R6RS Scheme interpreter mosh-doc - fast R6RS Scheme interpeter - reference documentation To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/mosh Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mosh/mosh_0.2.7+dfsg-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Note to potential reviewers: you may find my past RFS interesting. http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/06/msg00227.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/07/msg00291.html I have patched the source to avoid the requirement to use a patched libgc, so mosh now links against system libgc. The debian/rules now performs a 2-pass build: it bootstraps once using precompiled images, then builds itself with patches using the interpreter built in stage 1. Lintian overrides are documented in their respective files. Cheers, -- David Banks amoe...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOBNZ7ZxgzuLt383KwO0r6dwNwNJDWst4M8SFprgkJ=ssr6...@mail.gmail.com
RFS: jabber-querybot
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package jabber-querybot. * Package name: jabber-querybot Version : 0.0.4-1 Upstream Author : Marco Balmer ma...@balmer.name * URL : https://github.com/micressor/jabber-querybot * License : GPL-3+ Section : net It builds those binary packages: jabber-querybot - Modular xmpp/jabber bot To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/jabber-querybot Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jabber-querybot/jabber-querybot_0.0.4-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, -- Marco Balmer signature.asc Description: GnuPG Signature
Re: RFS: python-ipcalc [update]
* mezgani ali hand...@gmail.com, 2011-11-09, 12:49: http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-ipcalc Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-ipcalc/python-ipcalc_0.3-2.dsc (I don't intend to sponsor this package.) Lintian says: I: python-ipcalc source: quilt-patch-missing-description network.patch I: python-ipcalc source: quilt-patch-missing-description hex_toipv4.patch W: python-ipcalc source: patch-system-but-direct-changes-in-diff pkg-info These files should not be in diff.gz: debian/.pc/.quilt_patches debian/.pc/.quilt_series debian/.pc/.version Current standards version is 3.9.2. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2009130654.ga1...@jwilk.net
Re: RFS: python-ipcalc [update]
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 12:49:32PM +, mezgani ali wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-ipcalc. * Package name: python-ipcalc Version : 0.3-2 Upstream Author : Wijnand Modderman wijn...@freecode.nl * URL : http://dev.tehmaze.com/projects/ipcalc http://us.generation-nt.com/redirect.html?url=VDsCc1MhB3BQP1UoDS0GYQBlAHBWfVclATdValtjDWAMcVU1AChbP1BqBDtdfQFyBnQNZAVqAmFTY1JxVXMBIlQ6AndTNgdhUGlVZA%3D%3D * License : MIT Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-ipcalc - perform IP subnet calculations To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-ipcalc Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-ipcalc/python-ipcalc_0.3-2.dsc I: python-ipcalc source: quilt-patch-missing-description network.patch I: python-ipcalc source: quilt-patch-missing-description hex_toipv4.patch W: python-ipcalc source: patch-system-but-direct-changes-in-diff pkg-info Current Standards-Version is 3.9.2. The extended description starts with a lowercase letter. The Debian packaging including patches is GPL3 while the software itself is MIT so the resulting product must be GPL3. Years in the copyright do not include 2011. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: python-ipcalc [update]
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote: * mezgani ali hand...@gmail.com, 2011-11-09, 12:49: http://mentors.debian.net/**package/python-ipcalchttp://mentors.debian.net/package/python-ipcalc Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/**debian/pool/main/p/python-** ipcalc/python-ipcalc_0.3-2.dschttp://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-ipcalc/python-ipcalc_0.3-2.dsc (I don't intend to sponsor this package.) Lintian says: I: python-ipcalc source: quilt-patch-missing-**description network.patch I: python-ipcalc source: quilt-patch-missing-**description hex_toipv4.patch W: python-ipcalc source: patch-system-but-direct-**changes-in-diff pkg-info These files should not be in diff.gz: debian/.pc/.quilt_patches debian/.pc/.quilt_series debian/.pc/.version I create the package using debuild, so may i remoce .pc from debian directory and run debuild ? Current standards version is 3.9.2. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-REQUEST@lists.**debian.orgdebian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/**2009130654.GA1035@jwilk.**nethttp://lists.debian.org/2009130654.ga1...@jwilk.net -- Ali MEZGANI *N*etwork *E*ngineering/*S*ecurity http://www.nativelabs.org/
Help with fgrun
Could people review my package fgrun [1]. More specifically, it fails when you change the compat level to 9, should I report these errors to upstream? I also had some occasional bugs when building with pbuilder, but these seamed to disappear by themselves? Thanks, Chris 1: http://mentors.debian.net/package/fgrun signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
RFS: python-gnatpython
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-gnatpython. * Package name: python-gnatpython Version : 54-1 Upstream Author : AdaCore sa...@adacore.com * URL : http://forge.open-do.org/projects/gnatpython * License : GPL-2+ and GPL-3+ Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-gnatpython - python framework to ease development of test suites python-gnatpython-doc - python framework to ease development of test suites (examples) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-gnatpython Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-gnatpython/python-gnatpython_54-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. It is my first python package and I have followed most advices from Jakub Wilk [1], thanks to him again. Kind regards, Grave Xavier [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2011/09/msg00078.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk66ffoACgkQVIZi0A5BZF437wCfdk/8mIyT4vin0DXGYbXITYxH LbwAn1OJk9fD/3UfDp97pgsDlaThjUiB =g1Ih -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4eba7dfa.3030...@ipno.in2p3.fr
Re: RFS: python-ipcalc [update]
updated but still have a warning, please take a look at it On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:19 PM, mezgani ali hand...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote: * mezgani ali hand...@gmail.com, 2011-11-09, 12:49: http://mentors.debian.net/**package/python-ipcalchttp://mentors.debian.net/package/python-ipcalc Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/**debian/pool/main/p/python-** ipcalc/python-ipcalc_0.3-2.dschttp://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-ipcalc/python-ipcalc_0.3-2.dsc (I don't intend to sponsor this package.) Lintian says: I: python-ipcalc source: quilt-patch-missing-**description network.patch I: python-ipcalc source: quilt-patch-missing-**description hex_toipv4.patch W: python-ipcalc source: patch-system-but-direct-**changes-in-diff pkg-info These files should not be in diff.gz: debian/.pc/.quilt_patches debian/.pc/.quilt_series debian/.pc/.version I create the package using debuild, so may i remoce .pc from debian directory and run debuild ? Current standards version is 3.9.2. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-REQUEST@lists.**debian.orgdebian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/**2009130654.GA1035@jwilk.**nethttp://lists.debian.org/2009130654.ga1...@jwilk.net -- Ali MEZGANI *N*etwork *E*ngineering/*S*ecurity http://www.nativelabs.org/ -- Ali MEZGANI *N*etwork *E*ngineering/*S*ecurity http://www.nativelabs.org/
Re: RFS: stumpwm
Hi Desmond, On 07/11/11 18:05, Desmond O. Chang wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package stumpwm. I am not a DD so I can't upload your package. However I am a stumpwm user, except I have been using the upstream git version until now because I initially had trouble using the Debian package and didn't have the time to troubleshoot. Technically the package looks fine, it builds cleanly in a sid chroot. Lintian has one pedantic warning: P: stumpwm: copyright-refers-to-symlink-license usr/share/common-licenses/GPL You may want to change that to GPL-2. I faced some problems in using the package. Initially, both clisp and sbcl would complain about Component 'stumpwm' not found. I eventually found out that I needed a symlink: /usr/share/common-lisp/systems/stumpwm.asd - /usr/share/common-lisp/source/stumpwm/stumpwm.asd I presume the package was meant to set this link up itself, but for some reason it didn't. I installed it using 'dpkg -i' after building it with 'debuild'. You might want to use DEP-3 for patches. Consider updating your DEP-5 formatting: Format-Specification - Format Upstream-Source - Source Upstream-Maintainer - Upstream-Contact And you need to expand the short name for the license GPL-3+. Once I had set up the symlink, I was able to load and use stumpwm successfully with both SBCL and CLISP. I would give you some more detailed feedback on using the package, but at the moment I am using stumpwm with GNOME 3 (in fallback mode) and my configuration -- which is pretty fragile -- was broken. I believe this is because upstream git defaults to compiling an SBCL image as a binary, which has a marginally faster startup time. Because the packaged version of stumpwm loads slightly slower, GNOME is (most times!) able to load its panel first, causing Stumpwm to load on top of it, which breaks the ability to use the GNOME panel. [Suggestions welcome, I don't consider this a bug in the stump package because using stump with the GNOME panel seems to be quite a bizarre and non-recommended configuration. I have been meaning to migrate away from it but didn't get the time.] Thanks for your work on stumpwm! Cheers, David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/j9e2uj$nip$1...@dough.gmane.org
Re: RFS: python-ipcalc [update]
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 02:31:36PM +, mezgani ali wrote: updated but still have a warning, please take a look at it Your diff.gz creates python-ipcalc-0.3/pkg-info. Patch headers should be in DEP-3 form, though this is not a requirement. License issues still exist. README.source seems redundant. Description still contains lowercase letters (and paragraphs should be separated by an empty line). Homepage is 404. On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:19 PM, mezgani ali hand...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote: * mezgani ali hand...@gmail.com, 2011-11-09, 12:49: http://mentors.debian.net/**package/python-ipcalchttp://mentors.debian.net/package/python-ipcalc Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/**debian/pool/main/p/python-** ipcalc/python-ipcalc_0.3-2.dschttp://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-ipcalc/python-ipcalc_0.3-2.dsc (I don't intend to sponsor this package.) Lintian says: I: python-ipcalc source: quilt-patch-missing-**description network.patch I: python-ipcalc source: quilt-patch-missing-**description hex_toipv4.patch W: python-ipcalc source: patch-system-but-direct-**changes-in-diff pkg-info These files should not be in diff.gz: debian/.pc/.quilt_patches debian/.pc/.quilt_series debian/.pc/.version I create the package using debuild, so may i remoce .pc from debian directory and run debuild ? Current standards version is 3.9.2. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Uploaded package is not showing up in mentors
On 18:28 Tue 08 Nov , Ole Wolf wrote: Quoting Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com: As I mentioned I've uploaded orig.tar ball to above URL. I tried uploading the package again today but no luck it won't showup on the mentors web inteface. According to one of the mentors, there has a glitch in the upload script for the last day or so. I wasn't able to upload either, but my most recent attempt was successful. Maybe you should simply try one last time, now that the upload script appears to have been fixed. I tried uploading it again but with no luck. Package uploads successfully but it never shows up in the mentors web interface :( Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://blog.copyninja.info http://identi.ca/vasudev vasu...@joindiaspora.com (Ostatus) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 23:14, Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org wrote: Well, the only data point I have is yui which works fine with 4.5. I don't know of any other packages in Debian which need flex-sdk yet. So I would wait to cross that bridge when we get to it. Also when it does become necessary, the easier way will be to use git branches rather than have seperate sets of files. Okay. I don't have the code in front of me right now, but I believe I removed all the .exe and .bat files in debian/rules. I understand why you'd remove them in the .tar.gz, but I thought that for simplicity's sake, removing everything from the .tar.gz would wait until we were building from source. Adobe keeps those in their svn repo, unfortunately. The .a files may be necessary, because the SDK is able to produce AIR binaries for mobile devices. Ideally, those would also be built from source, but in the mean time, they should not be deleted from the package, IMO. The bottom line is if the package contains files for which there is no source code it cannot be included in Debian main. Perhaps the .a files can be split into a seperate (source) package called flex-sdk-nonfree or something. I see what you mean, but my intent was to get flex-sdk into non-free or contrib first. When that's finalized, we can undertake the (rather large) task of getting the SDK built from source, after which point it can be moved into main. In my opinion, there's no point in splitting it up right now, since none of it can currently be built from source. If, after the SDK is built from source, there are still small pieces of it that can't be built from source, then a flex-sdk-nonfree would make sense, in my opinion. Thanks, --Joey
Re: Uploaded package is not showing up in mentors
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 08:39:54PM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote: I tried uploading it again but with no luck. Package uploads successfully but it never shows up in the mentors web interface :( Is your GPG Key applied to the mentors web interface? -Marco signature.asc Description: GnuPG Signature
Re: RFS: python-libmemcached
* Shell Xu shell909...@gmail.com, 2011-11-04, 15:53: http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-libmemcached Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-libmemcached/python-libmemcached_0.40-1.dsc (I don't intend to sponsor this package.) Please consider using debhelper (= 8) rather than debhelper (= 8.0.0). The long description is... bad. Please consult Developer's Reference 6.2.3 about how should it look like. As per Python Policy 2.2, the binary package name should be python-cmemcached. The package fails to build in a minimal environment: | dh clean --with python2 |dh_testdir |dh_auto_clean | Traceback (most recent call last): | File setup.py, line 3, in module | from setuptools import setup, Extension | ImportError: No module named setuptools | dh_auto_clean: python setup.py clean -a returned exit code 1 | make: *** [clean] Error 2 -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2009152251.ga1...@jwilk.net
Re: Uploaded package is not showing up in mentors
On 16:20 Wed 09 Nov , Marco Balmer wrote: On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 08:39:54PM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote: I tried uploading it again but with no luck. Package uploads successfully but it never shows up in the mentors web interface :( Is your GPG Key applied to the mentors web interface? Yes it is applied to mentors. I've uploaded 2 packages before and I can still see them on mentors. Package I'm uploading is already uploaded to mentors by some one else. I strongly suspect this may be the cause of problem but I can't confirm because I don't know how debexpo handles multiple uploads of same package Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://blog.copyninja.info vasu...@joindiaspora.com (Ostatus) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: python-ipcalc [update]
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin w...@wrar.name wrote: On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 02:31:36PM +, mezgani ali wrote: updated but still have a warning, please take a look at it Your diff.gz creates python-ipcalc-0.3/pkg-info. Please can you explain me this point ? What is the problem with diff.gz ? Patch headers should be in DEP-3 form, though this is not a requirement. done License issues still exist. done README.source seems redundant. done Description still contains lowercase letters (and paragraphs should be separated by an empty line). done Homepage is 404. done On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:19 PM, mezgani ali hand...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote: * mezgani ali hand...@gmail.com, 2011-11-09, 12:49: http://mentors.debian.net/**package/python-ipcalc http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-ipcalc Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/**debian/pool/main/p/python-** ipcalc/python-ipcalc_0.3-2.dsc http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-ipcalc/python-ipcalc_0.3-2.dsc (I don't intend to sponsor this package.) Lintian says: I: python-ipcalc source: quilt-patch-missing-**description network.patch I: python-ipcalc source: quilt-patch-missing-**description hex_toipv4.patch W: python-ipcalc source: patch-system-but-direct-**changes-in-diff pkg-info These files should not be in diff.gz: debian/.pc/.quilt_patches debian/.pc/.quilt_series debian/.pc/.version I create the package using debuild, so may i remoce .pc from debian directory and run debuild ? Current standards version is 3.9.2. -- WBR, wRAR -- Ali MEZGANI *N*etwork *E*ngineering/*S*ecurity http://www.nativelabs.org/
Re: Uploaded package is not showing up in mentors
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com wrote: On 16:20 Wed 09 Nov , Marco Balmer wrote: On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 08:39:54PM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote: I tried uploading it again but with no luck. Package uploads successfully but it never shows up in the mentors web interface :( Is your GPG Key applied to the mentors web interface? Yes it is applied to mentors. I've uploaded 2 packages before and I can still see them on mentors. Package I'm uploading is already uploaded to mentors by some one else. I strongly suspect this may be the cause of problem but I can't confirm because I don't know how debexpo handles multiple uploads of same package Silly question, but can you paste the dput command's output? Are you sure it's going to debexpo and not ftp-master? Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://blog.copyninja.info vasu...@joindiaspora.com (Ostatus) -- All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors. #define sizeof(x) rand() :wq -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAO6P2QTVNCWcB5=0-DzzLy3T=vpajcxK1dZ-ês-jbtprk...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: sxiv (new upstream release)
* Daniel Echeverry epsilo...@gmail.com, 2011-11-05, 19:51: http://mentors.debian.net/package/sxiv Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sxiv/sxiv_1.0-1.dsc I have this terrible feeling of déjà vu… ;) You broke allow-cflags-override.diff, and CFLAGS from dpkg-buildflags are not passed to the build system anymore. Also, nowadays dpkg-buildflags sets also CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS, so please use them, too. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2009153614.ga5...@jwilk.net
Re: RFS: python-ipcalc [update]
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 03:33:09PM +, mezgani ali wrote: updated but still have a warning, please take a look at it Your diff.gz creates python-ipcalc-0.3/pkg-info. Please can you explain me this point ? What is the problem with diff.gz ? Did you read the description of patch-system-but-direct-changes-in-diff lintian tag? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Uploaded package is not showing up in mentors
On 10:34 Wed 09 Nov , Paul Tagliamonte wrote: snipped Silly question, but can you paste the dput command's output? Are you sure it's going to debexpo and not ftp-master? Yes it is going to mentors. Attached dput.upload and upload log written by dput Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://blog.copyninja.info vasu...@joindiaspora.com (Ostatus) Checking signature on .changes Good signature on /var/cache/pbuilder/result/dwm_5.9-1_amd64.changes. Checking signature on .dsc Good signature on /var/cache/pbuilder/result/dwm_5.9-1.dsc. Uploading to debexpo (via http to mentors.debian.net): Uploading dwm_5.9-1.dsc: done. Uploading dwm_5.9.orig.tar.gz: done. Uploading dwm_5.9-1.debian.tar.gz: done. Uploading dwm_5.9-1_amd64.deb: done. Uploading dwm_5.9-1_amd64.changes: done. Successfully uploaded packages. Successfully uploaded dwm_5.9-1.dsc to mentors.debian.net for debexpo. Successfully uploaded dwm_5.9.orig.tar.gz to mentors.debian.net for debexpo. Successfully uploaded dwm_5.9-1.debian.tar.gz to mentors.debian.net for debexpo. Successfully uploaded dwm_5.9-1_amd64.deb to mentors.debian.net for debexpo. Successfully uploaded dwm_5.9-1_amd64.changes to mentors.debian.net for debexpo. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: python-ipcalc [update]
All job is done Andrey, what do you think ? On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin w...@wrar.name wrote: On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 03:33:09PM +, mezgani ali wrote: updated but still have a warning, please take a look at it Your diff.gz creates python-ipcalc-0.3/pkg-info. Please can you explain me this point ? What is the problem with diff.gz ? Did you read the description of patch-system-but-direct-changes-in-diff lintian tag? -- WBR, wRAR -- Ali MEZGANI *N*etwork *E*ngineering/*S*ecurity http://www.nativelabs.org/
Re: RFS: blogofile
Am Mon, 31 Oct 2011 22:44:55 -0400 schrieb Andrew Starr-Bochicchio a.star...@gmail.com: On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Andreas Rütten andreasruet...@gmx.de wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package blogofile. * Package name : blogofile Version : 0.7.1-1 Upstream Author : Ryan McGuire r...@enigmacurry.com * URL : http://www.blogofile.com/ * License : Expat (MIT) Section : web It builds those binary packages: blogofile - Static website compiler and blog engine blogofile-converters - Blog converter collection for Blogofile Hi Andrew and everybody else, I'm still looking for a new review of my updated package. I fixed the issues which Andrew pointed out and also revert my change which Jakub mentioned. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/blogofile Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/blogofile/blogofile_0.7.1-1.dsc The package builds fine in my sid pbuilder environment. It has one (overridden) lintian warning which is about an extra-license-file. I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Andreas Rütten -- Andreas Rütten mailto : andreasruet...@gmx.de PGP, 6C9DFFB2, 8394 99DA 59BD BCE2 3FC8 3A9E 6633 0089 6C9D FFB2 -- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Upload to stable-security
On 31/10/11 19:42, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Hi, Tomasz Muras nexor1...@gmail.com writes: I need to upload my package [1] from unstable (version 1.9.9.dfsg2-4) to stable-security (yes, it's already agreed with the Security Team). How do I name it for security upload? Should I make a new entry in changelog and with version like 1.9.9.dfsg2-4+squeeze1? It needs to use a version *lower* than what you uploaded to unstable, for example you could use either -4~squeeze1 or -2.1+squeeze2 (as the current version in squeeze is -2.1+squeeze1). Yup - security team decided to go with -2.1+squeeze2. As far as I know, DMs can also not upload to security-master (yet) so you need to find a sponsor for it. If somebody from the security team did already ack your proposed patch, maybe he could also sponsor the upload? Thanks for the answers, I had two problems here: 1. DMs can not upload to security-master 2. I was trying to upload to a normal server instead of security one. I thought that putting master-security in changelog is enough to target security release. Apparently 2. is a common problem - Moritz even created a request to add warning for dput and dupload: * http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=647129 * http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=647130 Tomek -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ebab882.7020...@gmail.com
Re: What to do if there's already a debian-dir inside the .orig.tar?
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 4:25 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin w...@wrar.name wrote: On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 03:15:35AM -0800, Vincent Cheng wrote: You can simply ignore it; there's no need to repack the tarball just to remove the debian dir. dpkg-buildpackage (or your favourite wrapper) will remove the debian dir inside the original tarball and use yours at build time. This is true only for 3.0 (quilt) format. -- WBR, wRAR I guess I've learned something new today; thanks! Vincent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CACZd_tB7ZEVbokNx-UETEiUS-YfBDMW6PFqA0Xjfh=eaepn...@mail.gmail.com
Fwd: Why does lintian tell me this?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello everybody! When I'm running lintian on my almost finished package, it tells me: E: jailkit: duplicate-updaterc.d-calls-in-postinst jailkit E: jailkit: duplicate-updaterc.d-calls-in-postrm jailkit But why? I do not see anything duplicate there. Here are the complete files: postinst #!/bin/sh #DEBHELPER# set -e if ! grep /usr/sbin/jk_chrootsh /etc/shells /dev/null; then \ echo /usr/sbin/jk_chrootsh /etc/shells ;\ fi if [ -x /etc/init.d/jailkit ]; then update-rc.d jailkit defaults /dev/null if [ -x /usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d ]; then invoke-rc.d jailkit start else /etc/init.d/jailkit start fi fi exit 0 EOF postrm #!/bin/sh #DEBHELPER# set -e if [ $1 = purge ] ; then update-rc.d jailkit remove /dev/null fi EOF Can you help me, please? BR, Björn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk67GQsACgkQ3u1SIc8s7PV2dgEA1reE0MdL7MFctC1TYCA6i9hC ClL2vtU2LpzIHP8pkTYBAMu11ANPqvSyE+UkXILKNNU43h9FOxMmG23JCUfLMLJQ =7xOU -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ebb190b.9030...@googlemail.com
Re: Fwd: Why does lintian tell me this?
Hello everybody! When I'm running lintian on my almost finished package, it tells me: E: jailkit: duplicate-updaterc.d-calls-in-postinst jailkit E: jailkit: duplicate-updaterc.d-calls-in-postrm jailkit But why? I do not see anything duplicate there. You would need to look at the final result ... Here are the complete files: postinst #!/bin/sh #DEBHELPER# set -e if ! grep /usr/sbin/jk_chrootsh /etc/shells /dev/null; then \ echo /usr/sbin/jk_chrootsh /etc/shells ;\ fi if [ -x /etc/init.d/jailkit ]; then update-rc.d jailkit defaults /dev/null if [ -x /usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d ]; then invoke-rc.d jailkit start else /etc/init.d/jailkit start fi fi exit 0 [...] The #DEBHELPER# is there for a reason: it's for debhelper to put useful code in there. And that precisely will be this if [ -x /etc/init.d/jailkit ]; then ... fi bit. Just use #!/bin/sh set -e if ! grep /usr/sbin/jk_chrootsh /etc/shells /dev/null; then \ echo /usr/sbin/jk_chrootsh /etc/shells ;\ fi #DEBHELPER# and you should be fine. Same for your other file. Best, Michael pgpu2i4iQzxne.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Why does lintian tell me this?
* BjĂśrn Esser bjoern.es...@googlemail.com, 2011-11-10, 01:21: if ! grep /usr/sbin/jk_chrootsh /etc/shells /dev/null; then \ echo /usr/sbin/jk_chrootsh /etc/shells ;\ fi As per Policy 10.7.4, you must not modify /etc/shells this way. You should use add-shell here. (Though I'm not sure adding jk_chrootsh to /etc/shells is a good idea in the first place...) -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2010010242.ga7...@jwilk.net
Re: Fwd: Why does lintian tell me this?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Thanks a lot. This fixed it. I'm using add-shell now, too. Am 10.11.2011 01:48, schrieb Michael Tautschnig: Hello everybody! When I'm running lintian on my almost finished package, it tells me: E: jailkit: duplicate-updaterc.d-calls-in-postinst jailkit E: jailkit: duplicate-updaterc.d-calls-in-postrm jailkit But why? I do not see anything duplicate there. You would need to look at the final result ... Here are the complete files: postinst #!/bin/sh #DEBHELPER# set -e if ! grep /usr/sbin/jk_chrootsh /etc/shells /dev/null; then \ echo /usr/sbin/jk_chrootsh /etc/shells ;\ fi if [ -x /etc/init.d/jailkit ]; then update-rc.d jailkit defaults /dev/null if [ -x /usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d ]; then invoke-rc.d jailkit start else /etc/init.d/jailkit start fi fi exit 0 [...] The #DEBHELPER# is there for a reason: it's for debhelper to put useful code in there. And that precisely will be this if [ -x /etc/init.d/jailkit ]; then ... fi bit. Just use #!/bin/sh set -e if ! grep /usr/sbin/jk_chrootsh /etc/shells /dev/null; then \ echo /usr/sbin/jk_chrootsh /etc/shells ;\ fi #DEBHELPER# and you should be fine. Same for your other file. Best, Michael -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk67JpMACgkQ3u1SIc8s7PU4PAD/VctY04MX9kNQQJwgbwwL244J QC4lBSktOdO4GAOaSE0A/jKAQYlfWt6iXigNRWGKCxD/AcOQf4paU5bbG1q0oUp3 =D/sQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ebb2693.3010...@googlemail.com
Re: RFS: python-ipcalc [update]
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 04:54:34PM +, mezgani ali wrote: All job is done Andrey, what do you think ? You've renamed README.Debian to README.source. debian/patches/01_network.patch: - Why Forwarded: not-needed? - Origin: states that the patch was taken from #533437, this is not true - Bug-Debian: states that #533437 is related to the patch, this is not true either debian/patches/02_hextoipv4.patch: - Again, why Forwarded: not-needed? debian/copyright: - License: GPL-3 but text for MIT? Anyway, I'd suggest you to relicense your work to MIT rather than put additional burden on the package users by changing the package license. - The Debian packaging is: Copyright (C) 2011? What about 2009? debian/control: Description still starts from lowercase letters. On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin w...@wrar.name wrote: On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 03:33:09PM +, mezgani ali wrote: updated but still have a warning, please take a look at it Your diff.gz creates python-ipcalc-0.3/pkg-info. Please can you explain me this point ? What is the problem with diff.gz ? Did you read the description of patch-system-but-direct-changes-in-diff lintian tag? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
debian/rules override_dh_auto_build-indep
Hi all, I have been trying to split indep operations from the rest on the activiz.net package, see: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/activiz.net/trunk/debian/rules?view=markup However the -indep rules are still being called on the buildd machine: Eg: http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=activiz.netarch=s390xver=5.6.1-2stamp=1320869304 .. debian/rules override_dh_auto_build-indep make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd-activiz.net_5.6.1-2-s390x-TAnp4G/activiz.net-5.6.1' /usr/bin/make -C obj-* AVDN_doxygen make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd-activiz.net_5.6.1-2-s390x-TAnp4G/activiz.net-5.6.1/obj-s390x-linux-gnu' .. Am I missing something here ? Thanks -- Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CA+7wUswgYvn4UrzEYbEU8_WXhu6ZYQb47sbeOS9e5=_tq7=z...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, Joey Parrish wrote: I see what you mean, but my intent was to get flex-sdk into non-free or contrib first. When that's finalized, we can undertake the (rather large) task of getting the SDK built from source, after which point it can be moved into main. In my opinion, there's no point in splitting it up right now, since none of it can currently be built from source. If, after the SDK is built from source, there are still small pieces of it that can't be built from source, then a flex-sdk-nonfree would make sense, in my opinion. As you know I have an ulterior motive in helping you with this :-) I need flex-sdk to build-depend on for yui. If it goes into non-free or contrib, yui would have to do the same. I imagin Pau Garcia i Quiles faces the same situation. So I would like to make getting flex-sdk into main a high priority. Lets take the time to do it right. Hopefully it won't be too difficult. I have pushed my changes to the git repository now. Please take a look (make sure you get all the branches) and make sure I haven't pruned too much. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org
Re: RFS: flex-sdk-4.5
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: I need flex-sdk for jPlayer ( http://jplayer.org/ ), which is needed by witty 3.1.11+ could you test the package by building it from the repository and let us know if there are problems? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.DEB.2.02.100208080.16825@jaldhar-laptop
