Bug#659947: RFS: portabase
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, New package portabase is looking for sponsor. Portabase is a modern alternative to MobileDB (and to Jfile). Use case: you're taking water samples and analyse them on spot with portable colorimeter. Then you enter results to mobile version of portabase (I use my Nokia N900). Desktop version of this application comes handy to work with the data on workstation with full-size screen. Also Portabase is useful to prepare data for mobile use. * Package name: portabase * Version : 2.0-1-1 * Upstream Author : Jeremy Bowman jmbow...@alum.mit.edu * Homepage: http://portabase.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL-2+ * Section : databases * Language: C++ * Description : Easy-to-use personal database application Source package URL : http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/portabase/portabase_2.0-1-1.dsc It produces the binary package portabase. ### PortaBase is a program for conveniently managing one-table database files. It is available for many platforms, including Linux, Mac OS X, Windows, and Maemo. Features include: * String, Integer, Decimal, Boolean, Note (multi-line text), Date, Time, Calculation, Sequence, Image, and Enum column types; * custom data views (subsets of the columns in any order); * filter the displayed rows using sets of conditions; * sort the rows by any combination of columns, each in ascending or descending order; * add, delete, rearrange, and rename columns at any time; * view summary statistics for columns (total, average, min, max, etc.); * import data from CSV, XML, and MobileDB files; * export data to CSV and XML files; * command-line format conversions (to and from XML, from MobileDB); * optional data file encryption. ### QA information: Info: Package is Lintian clean Info: Package is not native Info: The maintainer and uploader emails are the same Info: Package is the latest upstream version Info: A watch file is present Info: The watch file works Info: The package uses straight debhelper Info: Closes WNPP bug #584570: ITP: portabase -- An easy-to-use personal database application To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/portabase Thank you. Regards, Dmitry. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
RFS: drwright (2nd try)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package drwright. * Package name : drwright Version : 3.2.4-1 Upstream Author : * URL : http://git.gnome.org/browse/drwright and http://live.gnome.org/drwright * License : GPL-2.0+ Section : gnome Description: Typing monitor to force typing breaks It's a program that forces you to take regular breaks to prevent RSI (Repetitive Strain Injury). It's similar to workrave. . It can be found in GNOME control center as typing break. You can specify the work interval (how much time you want to work between breaks) and a break interval (how long your break will be). It also allows postponing of breaks. Finally, there is a button to lock the screen (while the break is active) in case you want to step out indefinetely. . It used to be part of GNOME 2's main core, but is now packaged separately. Why this package? It has been requested to be packaged by at least 20 people, see affected at launchpad bug http://pad.lv/860776 and askubuntu question: http://askubuntu.com/questions/63999/how-can-i-re-enable-the-typing-break-in-11-10 Extra info: - It's regularly checked and uploaded at https://launchpad.net/~drwright/+archive/stable - Package is Lintian clean, with one override (drwright binary: desktop-command-not-in-package), since the desktop file runs gnome-control-center typing-break - Package is patched to replace OnlyShowIn=GNOME; with NotShowIn=KDE; (since it depends on gnome-control-center). Also patched to disable it by default. It builds these binary packages: drwright - Typing monitor to force typing breaks To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/drwright Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/drwright/drwright_3.2.4-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Savvas Radevic
Bug#658204: RFS: bibtool -- tool for BibTeX database manipulation
Hi Jerome, Jerome Benoit wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package bibtool. * Package name: bibtool Version : 2.53-1 Upstream Author : Gerd Neugebauer g...@gerd-neugebauer.de * URL : http://www.gerd-neugebauer.de/software/TeX/BibTool/index.en.html * License : GPL-1+ Section : tex It builds those binary packages: bibtool- tool for BibTeX database manipulation I took a look at your package, here are a few comments: - debian/preinst has a comment saying it should be removed post-etch; now seems like it'd be a good time. - lintian gives a few warnings: P: bibtool source: source-contains-cvs-control-dir regex-0.12/doc/CVS P: bibtool source: source-contains-cvs-control-dir regex-0.12/CVS P: bibtool source: unversioned-copyright-format-uri http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5 You may want to get in touch with upstream about that. Also, ideally regex shouldn't be embedded in the source. - I'm not sure why you're closing bugs #291134 and #187255 in the changelog; they're not fixed by this upload in particular, they're just not considered bugs. I think you should close these bugs manually and remove those two entries from the changelog. The second entry (Features have been either...) doesn't seem very useful; either give a brief summary of the changed features, or remove the entry entirely. The first entry (New upstream version) essentially suggests that there are new or extended features, and users should know to check the upstream changelog already. (Actually, looking into it, there isn't even an entry for 2.53 in Changes.xml.) - In debian/copyright, you list yourself as the sole copyright holder for the files under debian/*, but you didn't do the packaging from scratch. What about the copyright of the previous maintainers? - In the bibtool(1) man page, the FILES section states none and the DIAGNOSTICS section many; I think both sections should simply be removed. In the SEE ALSO section, the BibTool Manual is referred to as bibtool.tex, but this file isn't installed on Debian; instead, it should refer to bibtool.pdf.gz installed in /usr/share/doc/bibtool. Also, in the .TH header in bibtool.1, something more useful than local (like a date for instance) should be used. - Have you forwarded your patches for inclusion upstream? I hope this helps. Cheers, -- Benoît Knecht -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120215110517.gb18...@marvin.lan
Bug#658772: marked as done (RFS: burp/1.3.0-4 -- backup and restore program [ITP])
Your message dated Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:24:39 +0100 with message-id 4f3b95f7.2070...@debian.org and subject line Re: RFS: burp/1.3.0-4 -- backup and restore program [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #658772, regarding RFS: burp/1.3.0-4 -- backup and restore program [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 658772: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658772 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: debian-mentors Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package burp. * Package name: burp Version : 1.3.0 Upstream Author : Graham Keeling keel...@spamcop.net * URL : http://burp.grke.net/ * License : AGPLv3 Section : utils It builds those binary packages: burp - backup and restore program To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/burp Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/burp/burp_1.3.0.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Changes since the last upload: burp (1.3.0) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release (Closes: #658152) -- Bastiaan Franciscus van den Dikkenberg b...@dikkenberg.net Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:18:26 +0100 Kind regards, Bas van den Dikkenberg -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) iEYEARECAAYFAk8vEowACgkQInDFGMlxAyPNjACeLTCtQOG3ZRPmkTOq3ydISnut KjkAn0YovK1sUmUKIcdFb/Fvd5WfleMR =aoY8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Closing as a newer version is available in unstable. Ansgar ---End Message---
Bug#659045: marked as done (RFS: goplay (NMU))
Your message dated Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:22:24 +0100 with message-id 4f3b9570.4020...@debian.org and subject line Re: RFS: goplay (NMU) has caused the Debian Bug report #659045, regarding RFS: goplay (NMU) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 659045: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659045 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, NMU for package goplay is looking for a sponsor. (See attached debdiff output) # GoPlay! is a Graphical User Interface (GUI) that uses DebTags for easily finding games in Debian. The program uses FLTK for handling the widgets, and libept as the backend for retrieving the data. . GoPlay! is also a generic yet simple to use DebTags-based package browser. Prepackaged browsers GoLearn!, GoAdmin!, GoNet!, GoOffice!, GoSafe!, GoWeb! and GoScience! show applications (and for some of them also documentation) packages related to education, administration, network, office, safety, web and science. You can also roll your own custom browsers using commandline options. # * Source package URL : http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/goplay/goplay_0.4-1.1.dsc * Package name: goplay * Version : 0.4-1.1 * debian/changelog: goplay (0.4-1.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * Packaging update: - removed dh-buildinfo, autotools-dev + added missing build-deps, dh-autotools; build-deps optimised + compat and debhelper to version 9 + default hardening (with the exception of fortify) + standards to 3.9.2 + ept-cache replaced with apt-xapian-index in Depends (Closes: #615495 important:goplay must be run as root at least once to function) (Closes: #460921 wishlist:requires manual ept-cache reindex on the first start) + games-thumbnails moved to Recommends (Closes: #470047 wishlist:please Recommends: games-thumbnails instead of Depends) + no longer depends on g++-4.5 (Closes: #654733 important:non-standard gcc/g++ used for build...) + build-time .xpm icon regeneration, no longer ship pre-built icon (imagemagick added to build-deps) * patch to introduce 'goscience' browser, thanks to Frederic Daniel Luc Lehobey (Closes: #474603 wishlist:Please add a goscience browser) * debian/copyright: + updated list of contributors + little correction for DEP-5 compliance To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/goplay Cheers, Dmitry. diff -Nru goplay-0.4/debian/changelog goplay-0.4/debian/changelog --- goplay-0.4/debian/changelog 2010-06-25 18:37:46.0 +1000 +++ goplay-0.4/debian/changelog 2012-02-08 03:15:17.0 +1100 @@ -1,3 +1,33 @@ +goplay (0.4-1.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Packaging update: +- removed dh-buildinfo, autotools-dev ++ added missing build-deps, dh-autotools; build-deps optimised ++ compat and debhelper to version 9 ++ default hardening (with the exception of fortify) ++ standards to 3.9.2 ++ ept-cache replaced with apt-xapian-index in Depends + (Closes: #615495 important:goplay must be run as root at least + once to function) + (Closes: #460921 wishlist:requires manual ept-cache reindex on + the first start) ++ games-thumbnails moved to Recommends + (Closes: #470047 wishlist:please Recommends: games-thumbnails + instead of Depends) ++ no longer depends on g++-4.5 + (Closes: #654733 important:non-standard gcc/g++ used for build...) ++ build-time .xpm icon regeneration, no longer ship pre-built icon + (imagemagick added to build-deps) + * patch to introduce 'goscience' browser, +thanks to Frederic Daniel Luc Lehobey +(Closes: #474603 wishlist:Please add a goscience browser) + * debian/copyright: ++ updated list of contributors ++ little correction for DEP-5 compliance + + -- Dmitry Smirnov only...@member.fsf.org Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:08:17 +1100 + goplay (0.4-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low [ Peter De Wachter ] diff -Nru goplay-0.4/debian/clean goplay-0.4/debian/clean --- goplay-0.4/debian/clean 1970-01-01 10:00:00.0 +1000 +++ goplay-0.4/debian/clean 2012-02-08 02:49:34.0 +1100 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +goplay.xpm diff -Nru goplay-0.4/debian/compat goplay-0.4/debian/compat --- goplay-0.4/debian/compat 2010-06-25 17:58:22.0 +1000 +++ goplay-0.4/debian/compat 2012-02-08
Re: Proable multiarch related problem in finding header file (Was: Problem finding posix_types_32.h when using pbuilder on the fis-gtm package)
Mathieu, Thanks for the hint, This is what dpkg --status pbuilder reports in the VM where I'm building the fis-gtm package: $ dpkg --status pbuilder Package: pbuilder Status: install ok installed Priority: extra Section: devel Installed-Size: 1212 Maintainer: Debian pbuilder maintenance team pbuilder-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org Architecture: all Version: 0.199+nmu1squeeze1 Depends: debootstrap | cdebootstrap, wget, debianutils (= 1.13.1), coreutils (= 4.5.8-1), debconf (= 0.5) | debconf-2.0 Recommends: fakeroot, sudo, devscripts Suggests: pbuilder-uml, gdebi-core, cowdancer Conffiles: /etc/bash_completion.d/pbuilder 6af3c8c99796ab77971de5ffac83a0f8 /etc/pbuilder/buildd-config.sh 48b942cabcc5fcfe94f28538239573ba ... Is this an old version ? Thanks Luis - On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote: Andreas, Doing a quick check on packages.d.o I can see the file your are talking about. However: http://packages.debian.org/search?suite=sidarch=anymode=pathsearchon=contentskeywords=posix_types.h returns an empty list. Are you sure your pbuilder is up to date ? 2cts On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote: Hi, just a comment on this: I suspect a multiarch issue and http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/06/msg2.html Multiarch handling of header files (/usr/include) will require more per-package attention, ... so Luis is asking for some hints how to deal with this like the need to specify explicite header search path via -I options or something like this. Any more detailed hint than the above would be helpful. Kind regards Andreas. On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 05:14:47PM -0500, Luis Ibanez wrote: Debian-mentors, I'm working on packaging fis-gtm, The configuration files that I'm using are here: svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-med/trunk/packages/fis-gtm/fis-gtm/trunk/debian http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/fis-gtm/fis-gtm/trunk/debian/ These are setup to get the tarball by using: uscan --verbose --force-depends I manage to build the package locally by using debuild, but, when I use the pdebuild command, I get the following output: - Start the build - Linux Host 32 Linux Host linux i386 x86_regs Source Directory List: sr_linux sr_i386 sr_x86_regs sr_unix_gnp sr_unix_cm sr_unix_nsb sr_unix sr_port_cm sr_port make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B' mkdir -p /tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/pro/map tcsh -f /tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_unix/gen_gtm_threadgbl_deftypes.csh /tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B sr_port pro/obj sr_linux sr_i386 sr_x86_regs sr_unix_gnp sr_unix_cm sr_unix_nsb sr_unix sr_port_cm sr_port Entering gen_gtm_threadgbl_deftypes.csh to build gtm_threadgbl_deftypes.h ~/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/pro/obj ~/fis-gtm-5.4-002B Replacing /tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_linux/gtm_threadgbl_deftypes.h ~/fis-gtm-5.4-002B Exiting gen_gtm_threadgbl_deftypes.csh make -C /tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/pro/obj -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/pro/obj -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_linux -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_i386 -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_x86_regs -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_unix_gnp -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_unix_cm -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_unix_nsb -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_unix -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_port_cm -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_port -f /tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_unix/comlist.mk CURRENT_BUILDTYPE=pro all Linux Host 32 Linux Host linux i386 x86_regs Source Directory List: sr_linux sr_i386 sr_x86_regs sr_unix_gnp sr_unix_cm sr_unix_nsb sr_unix sr_port_cm sr_port make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/pro/obj' cc1: note: obsolete option -I- used, please use -iquote instead /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/asm/posix_types.h:2:30: fatal error: posix_types_32.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. cc1: note: obsolete option -I- used, please use -iquote instead cc1: note: obsolete option -I- used, please use -iquote instead /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/asm/posix_types.h:2:30: fatal error: posix_types_32.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. ... and goes on an on, repeating the error about posix_types_32.h. BTW: Please disregard the message: cc1: note: obsolete option -I- used, please use -iquote instead This is a known issue, and probably not related to the problem with posix_types_32.h. I get the same cc1 warnings when building with dbuild and yet in that case the build is successful. I'm doing this in a Virtual Machine, in which uname -a returns: Linux debian-med 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP Mon Jan 16 16:04:25 UTC 2012 i686 GNU/Linux The host of this VM, returns for uname -a: Linux macondo 2.6.32-38-generic #83-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jan 4 11:12:07 UTC 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux Login into pbuilder, it
RFS: policyd-weight (10th try)
Is there ANY DD that would upload the package? That would be sooo nice if anyone DD could care ... I'm, in principal, waiting since three weeks for an upload. ... cheers and thanks, Werner Dear mentors, I've recreated a new version of my package policyd-weight (previous version 0.1.15.2-1 was already uploaded to unstable. This version includes another bugfix, delivers the /etc/default/policyd-weight and has some modifications within the init-script. Hence I'm looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight :) * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-2 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail It builds those binary packages: policyd-weight - Perl policy daemon for the Postfix MTA To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/policyd-weight Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Werner Detter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f37b8d9.3060...@aloah-from-hell.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f3b9d6e.1030...@aloah-from-hell.de
Re: Proable multiarch related problem in finding header file (Was: Problem finding posix_types_32.h when using pbuilder on the fis-gtm package)
Hi Luis, This was a mistake, linux-libc-dev still contains posix_*.h files. However the compilation failure seems to be coming from the use of -I- apparently, see thread at: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/02/msg00592.html HTH On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Luis Ibanez luis.iba...@kitware.com wrote: Mathieu, Thanks for the hint, This is what dpkg --status pbuilder reports in the VM where I'm building the fis-gtm package: $ dpkg --status pbuilder Package: pbuilder Status: install ok installed Priority: extra Section: devel Installed-Size: 1212 Maintainer: Debian pbuilder maintenance team pbuilder-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org Architecture: all Version: 0.199+nmu1squeeze1 Depends: debootstrap | cdebootstrap, wget, debianutils (= 1.13.1), coreutils (= 4.5.8-1), debconf (= 0.5) | debconf-2.0 Recommends: fakeroot, sudo, devscripts Suggests: pbuilder-uml, gdebi-core, cowdancer Conffiles: /etc/bash_completion.d/pbuilder 6af3c8c99796ab77971de5ffac83a0f8 /etc/pbuilder/buildd-config.sh 48b942cabcc5fcfe94f28538239573ba ... Is this an old version ? Thanks Luis - On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote: Andreas, Doing a quick check on packages.d.o I can see the file your are talking about. However: http://packages.debian.org/search?suite=sidarch=anymode=pathsearchon=contentskeywords=posix_types.h returns an empty list. Are you sure your pbuilder is up to date ? 2cts On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote: Hi, just a comment on this: I suspect a multiarch issue and http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/06/msg2.html Multiarch handling of header files (/usr/include) will require more per-package attention, ... so Luis is asking for some hints how to deal with this like the need to specify explicite header search path via -I options or something like this. Any more detailed hint than the above would be helpful. Kind regards Andreas. On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 05:14:47PM -0500, Luis Ibanez wrote: Debian-mentors, I'm working on packaging fis-gtm, The configuration files that I'm using are here: svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-med/trunk/packages/fis-gtm/fis-gtm/trunk/debian http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/fis-gtm/fis-gtm/trunk/debian/ These are setup to get the tarball by using: uscan --verbose --force-depends I manage to build the package locally by using debuild, but, when I use the pdebuild command, I get the following output: - Start the build - Linux Host 32 Linux Host linux i386 x86_regs Source Directory List: sr_linux sr_i386 sr_x86_regs sr_unix_gnp sr_unix_cm sr_unix_nsb sr_unix sr_port_cm sr_port make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B' mkdir -p /tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/pro/map tcsh -f /tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_unix/gen_gtm_threadgbl_deftypes.csh /tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B sr_port pro/obj sr_linux sr_i386 sr_x86_regs sr_unix_gnp sr_unix_cm sr_unix_nsb sr_unix sr_port_cm sr_port Entering gen_gtm_threadgbl_deftypes.csh to build gtm_threadgbl_deftypes.h ~/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/pro/obj ~/fis-gtm-5.4-002B Replacing /tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_linux/gtm_threadgbl_deftypes.h ~/fis-gtm-5.4-002B Exiting gen_gtm_threadgbl_deftypes.csh make -C /tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/pro/obj -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/pro/obj -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_linux -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_i386 -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_x86_regs -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_unix_gnp -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_unix_cm -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_unix_nsb -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_unix -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_port_cm -I/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_port -f /tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/sr_unix/comlist.mk CURRENT_BUILDTYPE=pro all Linux Host 32 Linux Host linux i386 x86_regs Source Directory List: sr_linux sr_i386 sr_x86_regs sr_unix_gnp sr_unix_cm sr_unix_nsb sr_unix sr_port_cm sr_port make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/fis-gtm-5.4-002B/pro/obj' cc1: note: obsolete option -I- used, please use -iquote instead /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/asm/posix_types.h:2:30: fatal error: posix_types_32.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. cc1: note: obsolete option -I- used, please use -iquote instead cc1: note: obsolete option -I- used, please use -iquote instead /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/asm/posix_types.h:2:30: fatal error: posix_types_32.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. ... and goes on an on, repeating the error about posix_types_32.h. BTW: Please disregard the message: cc1: note: obsolete option -I- used, please use -iquote instead This is a known issue, and probably not related to the problem with posix_types_32.h. I get the same cc1 warnings when building with dbuild and yet in that
Bug#658204: RFS: bibtool -- tool for BibTeX database manipulation
Hello Benoit: Thanks for the look. On 15/02/12 12:05, Benoît Knecht wrote: Hi Jerome, Jerome Benoit wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package bibtool. * Package name: bibtool Version : 2.53-1 Upstream Author : Gerd Neugebauerg...@gerd-neugebauer.de * URL : http://www.gerd-neugebauer.de/software/TeX/BibTool/index.en.html * License : GPL-1+ Section : tex It builds those binary packages: bibtool- tool for BibTeX database manipulation I took a look at your package, here are a few comments: - debian/preinst has a comment saying it should be removed post-etch; now seems like it'd be a good time. - lintian gives a few warnings: P: bibtool source: source-contains-cvs-control-dir regex-0.12/doc/CVS P: bibtool source: source-contains-cvs-control-dir regex-0.12/CVS P: bibtool source: unversioned-copyright-format-uri http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5 I tried to fix the warnings emitted by lintian, but the lintian on my boxdoes not report the one above: how can I reproduce this report. You may want to get in touch with upstream about that. I got in touch with the upstream maintainer a few week ago to report thisissue and to submit patches: the upstream maintainer kindly cleaned up the source of the coming version and he integrated all the patches except a cosmetic one. Since then, I have kept in touch with him to fix issues in the coming version. Also, ideally regex shouldn't be embedded in the source. I asked to the upstream maintainer to get ride of it: as he want to keep it: may I follow his wish for the coming package of the coming version ? or not ? - I'm not sure why you're closing bugs #291134 and #187255 in the changelog; they're not fixed by this upload in particular, they're just not considered bugs. I think you should close these bugs manually and remove those two entries from the changelog. I am agree: I just closed them the wrong way. I am working on it: the two entries were removed; I am now the owner of the bugs; I am on my way to close bugs #291134 and #187255. The second entry (Features have been either...) doesn't seem very useful; either give a brief summary of the changed features, or remove the entry entirely. The first entry (New upstream version) essentially suggests that there are new or extended features, and users should know to check the upstream changelog already. (Actually, looking into it, there isn't even an entry for 2.53 in Changes.xml.) The entry was removed entirely. In the coming version, the changes are a reported in the LaTeX file `Changes.tex' which is up-to-date. In the coming package of the coming version, `Changes.xml' is replaced by `Changes.tex'. The `Changes.tex' LaTeX source is converted into HTLM format, then into a TXT format readable by human; it is also composed in PDF format as the upstream author play withfonts to comment changes. - In debian/copyright, you list yourself as the sole copyright holder for the files under debian/*, but you didn't do the packaging from scratch. What about the copyright of the previous maintainers? But I put a comment that mention them in the Comment entry: apparently isnot enough. I have just added Copyright entries for the two previous maintainers. - In the bibtool(1) man page, the FILES section states none and the DIAGNOSTICS section many; I think both sections should simply be removed. In the SEE ALSO section, the BibTool Manual is referred to as bibtool.tex, but this file isn't installed on Debian; instead, it should refer to bibtool.pdf.gz installed in /usr/share/doc/bibtool. Also, in the .TH header in bibtool.1, something more useful than local (like a date for instance) should be used. I am working on it. - Have you forwarded your patches for inclusion upstream? I forwarded my patches and the previous patches to the upstream maintainer: he kindly integrated all of them except a cosmetic one --- see the second answer above. I hope this helps. Cheers, Thanks, Jerome -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f3bc12b.3030...@rezozer.net
Re: RFS: starpy
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package starpy. * Package name: starpy Version : 1.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Michael C. Fletcher mcfle...@vrplumber.com * URL : https://github.com/asterisk-org/starpy * License : BSD-3-clause Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-starpy - Asterisk (AMI) protocols for Twisted Python To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/starpy Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/starpy/starpy_1.0.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, -- Paul Belanger | dCAP Polybeacon | Consultant Jabber: paul.belan...@polybeacon.com | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) | Blog: http://blog.polybeacon.com | Twitter: http://twitter.com/pabelanger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/callkq0sw5-spwtpkq7dmoz0wpyed6lt14_9wpvsn1cp8+5g...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#659991: RFS: hpfall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package hpfall. * Package name: hpfall Version : 2.6.38-1 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : https://launchpad.net/~pmjdebruijn/+archive/ppa/+build/2562251 * License : GPLv2 Section : misc It builds those binary packages: hpfall - HP 3D DriveGuard daemon for HP/Compaq laptops To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/hpfall Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hpfall/hpfall_2.6.38-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Bas van den Dikkenberg -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) iEYEARECAAYFAk873HcACgkQInDFGMlxAyM22gCdHuCXdkkZeNWxQ4kDqHapLX8f u58An0fYfy7JjbCgudmkC7hxwt3Ms/N+ =65h4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/9345AD5DE363814DA41482800A8D50641C8CCACA@srv01.dikkenberg.local
Bug#659996: RFS: python-gnatpython [fifth try]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-gnatpython. * Package name: python-gnatpython Version : 54-1 Upstream Author : AdaCore sa...@adacore.com * URL : http://forge.open-do.org/projects/gnatpython * License : GPL-2+ and GPL-3+ Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-gnatpython - python framework to ease development of test suites python-gnatpython-doc - python framework to ease development of test suites (examples) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-gnatpython Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-gnatpython/python-gnatpython_54-1.dsc This new package is a build dependency for the polyorb package. I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. It is my first python package and I have followed most advices from Jakub Wilk [1], Simon Chopin [2], Eugeniy Meshcheryakov [3], Stefano Rivera [4] and Nicolas Boulenguez thanks to them. After the following lintian command : lintian --pedantic -EI python-gnatpython_54-1_amd64.changes the package still presents the following P comments : P: python-gnatpython: no-upstream-changelog P: python-gnatpython-doc: no-upstream-changelog Since there isn't any changelog in upstream I don't know how to fix these comments or if it worth's a lintian overrides. Kind regards, Grave Xavier [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2011/09/msg00078.html [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/01/msg00396.html [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/01/msg00736.html [4] http://lists.debian.org/debian-ada/2012/02/msg5.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPO98PAAoJEG3iFwasTcfa+7QQAI2JhRmjYUWwB8X2gYNlpxxk ugEq83ojJAsCH64Rg2ELVuFgP2JOZMCnZXVeQjeelEyCWhqm3w/UEVwq5k13rBbj 1CXvqJnPDlBnwg2liOUrMi7Iym2w3kDZwKbm/Sel9vfkUFRbAnZVX2A+Q9yEL5bX 7eptRXljCZmkKiBdgyF0017ClaLkGiYxDKBElHrA4SYPdEKZQ5gwY3nihn6fPS/3 yzvxGcpKAa2RVvzTBDLIY1g2DqMJrua6D+lgX1ZEIcIZgQv2FmU+BE4RSQKno9aq Lma2NnHWaDPgK67yM/Lsjse2Xc4MGPjHo3WpI3LtMp0oXOMygJOXgt3xiYIHV8Ms dFBscjLndSU73djf62IyLtEbBQKGTUyI771nVBjpUFncn17FfBs4FBB8TAH1oSHr bl0TuNH6k7QH8Ptox2xhM0G7nm5tNvqd69jm5TjC7dw3EuOuP2xH2E+zwI3BFACC /WWu3h5NSzyg+ISHWLZW60WvpBoqs6w+WkDES+GhBXpS4/MQuIJugLcJftSHE8nF 7JQLyKIbf2tQeyY1NdpRmRKErXfvaPV6Sh3WIQBXMRFBcZyMlguTYLLhabAHOBc7 rAd/WhKxCW72lHqR507EmSLceOY4gFIsIdiszMtnD2cv9YPeWRu/CxdxCYynSP4j 3Vor7hyfnqlhZFBRy9Yp =7d6x -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f3bdf0f.9010...@ipno.in2p3.fr
Bug#659991: RFS: hpfall
On 02/15/2012 05:26 PM, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote: Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : https://launchpad.net/~pmjdebruijn/+archive/ppa/+build/2562251 I don't think a build status page qualifies as a useful URL for a package. Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f3be2fe.5020...@debian.org
Re: Bug#658204: RFS: bibtool -- tool for BibTeX database manipulation
I tried to fix the warnings emitted by lintian, but the lintian on my boxdoes not report the one above: how can I reproduce this report. Use the Lintian version in backports (or in Sid). Do not use the version in Stable. It is not updated. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/camtvz+tbga0awyjnyz8r8dc14+dgwdft7mbt7mrm-c+bc8r...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#658835: RFS: aspsms-t 1.3.1
Dear mentors, dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aspsms-t/aspsms-t_1.3.1-1.dsc Changes since last upload: * New 1.3.1 upstream files * deb packaging improved Best, -- Marco Balmer More love reports than bug reports signature.asc Description: GnuPG Signature
Processed: RFS: xfonts-bolkhov/20001007-7 [ITA] -- Cyrillic fonts for X
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 658426 RFS: xfonts-bolkhov/20001007-7 [ITA] -- Cyrillic fonts for X Bug #658426 [sponsorship-requests] xfonts-bolkhov/20001007-7 [ITA] -- Cyrillic fonts for X Changed Bug title to 'RFS: xfonts-bolkhov/20001007-7 [ITA] -- Cyrillic fonts for X' from 'xfonts-bolkhov/20001007-7 [ITA] -- Cyrillic fonts for X' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 658426: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658426 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.132933079910468.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#658204: RFS: bibtool -- tool for BibTeX database manipulation
Guido van Steen wrote: I tried to fix the warnings emitted by lintian, but the lintian on my boxdoes not report the one above: how can I reproduce this report. Use the Lintian version in backports (or in Sid). Do not use the version in Stable. It is not updated. Yes, and run it with '-IE --pedantic' to get all the warnings. -- Benoît Knecht -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120215183439.ga29...@marvin.lan
RFS: preload, prelink and xfonts-bolkhov (2 weeks)
Dear Mentors, It has been a while since I reported three RFS bugs against sponsorship-requests, regarding some packages I would like to adopt. All the new revisions are up in mentors.debian.net: prelink/0.0.20111012-1 [ITA] - ELF prelinking utility to speed up dynamic linking http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/prelink/prelink_0.0.20111012-1.dsc preload/0.6.4-2 [ITA] -- adaptive readahead daemon http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/preload/preload_0.6.4-2.dsc xfonts-bolkhov/20001007-7 [ITA] -- Cyrillic fonts for X http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfonts-bolkhov/xfonts-bolkhov_1.1.20001007-7.dsc I would very much appreciate it if anyone had a quick look at them. Thanks for your time! Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#660014: RFS: portabase
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, New package git-ftp is looking for sponsor. Package name: git-ftp Version: 0.6.0+git20110923-1 Upstream Author: René Moser m...@renemoser.net URL: https://github.com/resmo/git-ftp License: GPL-3 Description: git-ftp is a shell script for uploading Git tracked files to an FTP server. By default, it uploads only those files which have changed since the last upload. . This saves time and bandwidth. It can even work with different branches. Source package URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/git-ftp/git-ftp_0.6.0+git20110923-1.dsc To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/git-ftp Thank you. Regards, Dmitry. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 660014 RFS: git-ftp -- Git powered FTP client written as shell script Bug #660014 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: portabase Changed Bug title to 'RFS: git-ftp -- Git powered FTP client written as shell script' from 'RFS: portabase' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 660014: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660014 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.132933346528131.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: RFS: trash-cli
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Stefano Karapetsas stef...@karapetsas.com wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package trash-cli. I talked with Steve Stalcup (the current maintainer, but he's not a DD), with Andrew Starr-Bochicchio (who packaged trash-cli previously on mentors) and with Andrea Francia (the upstream author) and I packaged the latest upstream git snapshot of trash-cli (it's stable). Hi Stefano, Thanks for working on this. trash-cli is a very useful package, and it's always depressing when an upstream maintainer has to discourage Debian users from using the packaged version due to it being old/containing bugs already fixed upstream. I hope you have better luck finding a sponsor than I did when trying to update this. A few comments though... As the names of the binaries have changed, I think a debian/NEWS entry is called for in the case people are using it in scripts. Here is some suggested language: The names of the binaries provided by this package have been changed upstream. Both the old command and its corresponding new command are provided below for your convenience. Please update any usage in scripts accordingly. Old command: New command: - trash- trash-put - empty-trash - trash-empty - list-trash - trash-list - restore-trash - trash-restore It would be nice to point the watch file somewhere useful if we're already updating the package. Assuming future releases will happen on github: version=3 http://githubredir.debian.net/github/andreafrancia/trash-cli (.*).tar.gz Bug #593104 was fixed upstream and could be closed in the changelog. You also fix Bug #510043, and should close it. Though, you should use X-Python-Version rather than XS-Python-Version. Thanks! -- Andrew Starr-Bochicchio Ubuntu Developer https://launchpad.net/~andrewsomething Debian Maintainer http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=a.starr.b%40gmail.com PGP/GPG Key ID: D53FDCB1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cal6k_aybb+hxn7cj0f74sjndhacruv+ztvvkb9srfuolyvr...@mail.gmail.com
RFS: bibtexconv
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package bibtexconv. * Package name: bibtexconv Version : 0.8.10-1 Upstream Author : Thomas Dreibholz dre...@iem.uni-due.de * URL : http://www.iem.uni-due.de/~dreibh/bibtexconv/index.html * License : GPL version 3 Section : tex It builds those binary packages: bibtexconv - BibTeX Converter To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/bibtexconv Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bibtexconv/bibtexconv_0.8.10-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Thomas Dreibholz signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: RFS: freefilesync - folder comparison and synchronization tool (new upstream version - 3)
Dear mentors, Here is a new version of FreeFileSync package which solves lintian warning with debian/watch file. So I am still looking for a sponsor for my package freefilesync. FreeFileSync is a folder comparison and synchronization tool. It is optimized for highest performance and usability without restricted or overloaded UI interfaces. * Package name: freefilesync Version : 5.0.1-4 Upstream Author : ZenJu zhnmju...@gmx.de * URL : http://freefilesync.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL-3 Section : utils It builds this binary package: freefilesync - folder comparison and synchronization tool. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/freefilesync Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/freefilesync/freefilesync_5.0.1-4.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Damien Lecan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f3c1b5a.2070...@dlecan.com
Re: notify command
Oh no, I'm looking for notify classic command, it used by a set of old unix and distro such as nice, renice and so on. You can the following link: http://www.manpagez.com/man/1/notify/osx-10.7.php ---mohsen On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 21:07 +, Javi Merino wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 07:08:33AM +0330, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote: Dear all, I'm preparing matterial and need to notify command in debian.I guess it's renamed, do you know its new name? I suppose you are looking for notify-send in libnotify-bin. Cheers, Javi (Vicho) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#659854: RFS: vpnc/0.5.3r512-1 - Cisco-compatible VPN client (new upstream snapshot)
Hi Gregor, thanks a lot for the review. I've uploaded a new package into the same spot: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vpnc/vpnc_0.5.3r512-1.dsc http://mentors.debian.net/package/vpnc - I think PREFIX is only needed for the install but not for the build target in debian/rules. you're right, I've removed the build target override - uscan - debian/watch don't work. I don't know if there are releases planned but for the svn snapshots a get-orig-source target might be nice. I don't know of any planned releases, but I suspect the active contributors don't have access to the website... I've added a get-orig-source target. (uscan works for me, only it says remote site does not even have current version -- I suppose that's what you meant?) - debian/copyright: mismatch between GPL-2+ and version 1 ... GPL-1. uh, I wonder where I mis-copy-pasted that paragraph from... :-O - debhelper 9 might (or might not, I haven't checked) pass more hardening *FLAGS down to the build system? - Similar: The package doesn't seem to honour DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt. dh 9 does in fact pass extra hardening options to gcc, and also honours DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS (and produces lots of ignored-return-value warnings). I bumped the dh compat level. - mk-version: 6: mk-version: Syntax error: ( unexpected looks a bit ugly (only triggered by dash, not by bash or zsh, and checkbashisms also whines), and it leads to -DVERSION=\\ in the gcc calls. ...and an empty version string for vpnc --version. That's indeed ugly! I had somehow thought it would just use the latest upstream release version without any SVN revision, and postponed the investigation, so thanks for spotting this! I'll email upstream about the bashisms (probably easiest to just switch the interpreter to /bin/bash), and patched the Makefile to take the full upstream version string from dpkg-parsechangelog. (If you have the package in git somewhere reviewing future changes would be more convenient for me :)) of course! https://github.com/fschlich/Debian-vpnc or rather git clone git://github.com/fschlich/Debian-vpnc.git vpnc Florian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120215231931.gz11...@zedat.fu-berlin.de
Bug#660049: RFS: mosh/0.2.7+dfsg-1 [NEW] -- fast R6RS Scheme interpreter
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package hello: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mosh/mosh_0.2.7+dfsg-1.dsc It builds these binary packages: mosh - fast R6RS Scheme interpreter mosh-doc - fast R6RS Scheme interpeter - reference documentation More information about hello can be obtained from http://code.google.com/p/mosh-scheme/. Please see my previous RFS mails for more information on the packaging: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/06/msg00227.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/11/msg00549.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/01/msg00253.html Cheers, David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120216000727.4616.89173.report...@vuurvlieg.phys.solasistim.net
Bug#658204: RFS: bibtool -- tool for BibTeX database manipulation
On 15/02/12 19:34, Benoît Knecht wrote: Guido van Steen wrote: I tried to fix the warnings emitted by lintian, but the lintian on my boxdoes not report the one above: how can I reproduce this report. Use the Lintian version in backports (or in Sid). Do not use the version in Stable. It is not updated. Yes, and run it with '-IE --pedantic' to get all the warnings. I did not played with enough option: this issue is solved. -- Jerome BENOIT jgmbenoit-at+rezozer*dot_net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f3c634a.7030...@rezozer.net
Mentors upload authentication
Based on discussion about making mentors official, one of the key requirements is contributor DMUP agreement and upload authentication. One thought I had recently was to move the file hosting functionality over to alioth, which already has the necessary authentication infrastructure. The process from a contributors perspective then would be something like: 1. Contributor creates alioth account and signs DMUP (of course needs alioth to require DMUP signing requirement for -guest accounts first, which probably needs to be done there anyway) 2. Contributor [creates and] uploads public key to alioth 3. Contributor uploads their packages over ssh using public key auth, thus populating dirs like http://alioth.debian.org/~gilbert-guest. A dput.cf for this configuration looks something like this [unstable] fqdn = vasks.debian.org incoming = public_html/unstable progress_indicator = 2 method = scp allow_unsigned_uploads = 0 allowed_distributions = (.*) 4. debexpo scrapes and parses all packages found in -guest account dirs, then presents info on its pages mostly like it currently does 5. Contributor then sends sponsorship-requests mail with references to their packages on alioth. This makes debexpo/mentors itself quite a bit simpler, and reuses existing infrastructure. Both of which I think are good goals. Anyway, just a crazy idea I wanted to get out there. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=mo9aphw-rtx8k9vjpcyyjx05-+y51zowvmmdz0vxvn...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Mentors upload authentication
I don't think that will work, since you need to be in a project to get SSH access to alioth: http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/SSH#I.27m_unable_to_Connect_via_SSH.2C_... -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6FHL=4vgmub+ia7t+ckiggz8e9p+yhb0dxpjfdubu9...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Mentors upload authentication
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Paul Wise wrote: I don't think that will work, since you need to be in a project to get SSH access to alioth: http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/SSH#I.27m_unable_to_Connect_via_SSH.2C_... They could be made part of a new contributors project to start them out. Perhaps that would be temporary (a month max or something) with encouragement to get on a real project, and watched a bit more closely than other accounts to detect possibly malicious actions? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=MNj+Oa9nQ3qAWZpWSwie+Y=e-e_ch60kkdemw4mhd1...@mail.gmail.com
RFS: adminer (2nd Try)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package adminer. * Package name: adminer Version : 3.3.3-1 Upstream Author : Jakub Vrana * URL : http://adminer.org * License : GPL-2, Apache-2.0 Section : web It builds those binary packages: adminer- Web based database administration To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/adminer Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/adminer/adminer_3.3.3-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Sincerely, -- Medhamsh Hacktivist | http://medhamsh.org BD16 E32E CA4D 83A3 1270 725D D766 7997 0ABC 20E9 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/10434.122.169.150.18.1329368428.squir...@mail.medhamsh.org
Re: Mentors upload authentication
This one time, at band camp, Michael Gilbert said: Based on discussion about making mentors official, one of the key requirements is contributor DMUP agreement and upload authentication. One thought I had recently was to move the file hosting functionality over to alioth, which already has the necessary authentication infrastructure. The process from a contributors perspective then would be something like: I think that there are two main problems with this idea: First, alioth, while having an infrastructure for ssh keys, doesn't know anything about gpg keyrings and signed packages and so on, so all of that work still has to be done (and this is the hard bit - distributing ssh public keys is easy). Second, I think requiring all contributors on alioth to sign the DMUP is a very bad idea. We host some external project like SANE that have no reason to want to sign agreements about their usage of machines they'll never log in to. Even if we did think it was a good idea, account creation is entirely automatic and on demand - we have no way of ensuring people have read and agreed to something beyond adding a click through web page at creation time or something (ick!). So, I think this doesn't sound like a good fit to me, sorry. Cheers, -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | : :' :sg...@debian.org | | `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer | |`- http://www.debian.org | - signature.asc Description: Digital signature
