Bug#660162: marked as done (sponsorship-requests: RFS: tack/1.07-2)
Your message dated Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:12:04 +0100 with message-id 20120229081204.ga9...@jwilk.net and subject line Re: Bug#660162: RFS: tack/1.07-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #660162, regarding sponsorship-requests: RFS: tack/1.07-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 660162: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660162 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist * Package name: tack Version : 1.07 Upstream Author : Thomas Dickey dic...@invisible-island.net * URL or Web page : ftp://ftp.invisible-island.net/ncurses/ * License : GPL-2+ Description : terminfo action checker Section : misc The 'tack' program is a diagnostic tool that is designed to create and verify the correctness of terminfo's. This program can be used to create new terminal descriptions that are not included in the standard ncurses release. It builds those binary packages: tack - terminfo action checker tack-dbg - terminfo action checker (debug) It was in Debian before, but got orphaned and eventually dropped; see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=543860. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/tack Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tack/tack_1.07-2.dsc Here are the new changelog entries: tack (1.07-2) unstable; urgency=low * Actually get debhelper to update config.guess and config.sub. (It seems that the autotools-dev addon must be explicitly requested.) Thanks to Jakub Wilk for prompting me to check this again. * Add debhelper bump to changelog for 1.07-1. * Add Vcs-Browser: and Vcs-Git: fields to debian/control. * Install a symlink CHANGES.gz - changelog.gz in the doc directory. * Update debian/copyright to current (nearly-1.0) DEP5 format. * Closes: #660140 (ITP for this package). -- Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:40:07 -0500 tack (1.07-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. * Adopt package. * Switch to dpkg-source 3.0 (quilt) format. * Let debhelper handle pulling up-to-date config.guess and config.sub in from autotools-dev. * Fix hyphen-used-as-minus-sign warning from lintian. * Update package to standards version 3.9.2. * Add a debian/watch file again. * Bump debhelper build-depends: to (= 7.0.50~), since we use override_dh_foo targets. * Enable build warnings. -- Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:37:39 -0500 -- Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread! ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- I applied the attached patch and uploaded the package. Thanks. -- Jakub Wilk --- tack-1.07/debian/changelog 2012-02-29 03:06:34.0 +0100 +++ tack-1.07/debian/changelog 2012-02-29 03:29:44.0 +0100 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -tack (1.07-1~mentors8) unstable; urgency=low +tack (1.07-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. * Adopt package. ---End Message---
Bug#661634: RFS: fonts-play/1.002+20111215.1+ds1-1
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 12:06 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: Uploaded. There are some warnings from fontlint, run: apt-get install fontforge-nox find -iname *.ttf -o -iname *.otf -o -iname *.sfd -o -iname *.pfa -o -iname *.pfb -o -iname *.bdf -o -iname *.pk -o -iname *.ttc -o -iname *.pcf | xargs --no-run-if-empty fontlint The one lintian complaint (and the watch file) is an indicator of upstream's practices being bogus. Yes, I have reported those upstream, the patch only fixes some of the really low-hanging fruit. Hmm, gfd does increment font versions; but alas does not supply any tarballs accordingly, only non-source via google webfonts. -- Martin Erik Werner martinerikwer...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Bug#652826: Bug#624991: Bug#652826: RFS: logkeys (fixing RC bugs)
On 19.02.2012 14:11, Julien Cristau wrote: Hi Vedran, On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:18:52 +0100, Vedran Furač wrote: On 12.01.2012 11:21, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: Hey, since you're DD, and I am not, would you be so kind and sponsor the upload? I am and I would be willing. Could you please provide a package also fixing that RC bug? I'll upload it as soon as I could test it, however so far logkeys fails for me with the following error message: Hey, ok, I'll prepare a package this weekend and let you know. That was a month ago. Any progress? Sorry for delay, here it is, but it needs a second pair of eyes: http://mentors.debian.net/package/logkeys http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/logkeys/logkeys_0.1.1a-3.dsc Thanks, Vedran attachment: vedran_furac.vcf
Bug#661664: RFS: pyswisseph/1.77.00-0-3 [ITP]
(Please use X-Debbugs-Cc, rather than Cc, when submittig bugs. That way
the other parties will get the mail with bug number in the subject.)
I don't intend to sponsor this package, but here's my review:
* Paul Elliott pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com, 2012-02-28, 18:32:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pyswisseph/pyswisseph_1.77.00-0-3.dsc
Please get rid of “645551 is the bug number of your ITP” and “source
package automatically created by stdeb” cruft from the changelog.
“Vcs-Browser” would be more consistent and more common capitalization
than “Vcs-browser”.
I'd merge all 3 changelog entries into one, and remove of the stuff from
it. There's no point mentioning that e.g. you added copyright file in an
initial release. Of course you did. (But OTOH patches you added might be
worth mentioning.)
Remove ${python:Breaks}, nothing generates this substitution variable
anymore.
The package description is very bad. Please see Developer's Reference
§6.2.3.
The copyright file doesn't say where the upstream sources were obtained.
This is serious violation of Policy §12.5.
I don't understand your lintian override. Why you can't correct the
spelling?
You can remove “--buildsystem=python_distutils” from debian/rules; dh is
able to detect the build system automatically.
Please get rid of the “This file was automatically generated by stdeb”
comment.
Do not use patches to remove files. Such patches are huge and are very
likely cause conflicts in the future. Just remove the files in
debian/rules (but see below).
The patches have “Forwarded: yes”, but were they actually forwarded? If
yes, to who? They look Debian-specific to me.
Assuming that you meant to use DEP-3 for your patch headers, and as far
as I understand the specification, you need an empty line before the
pseudo-header.
Please regenerate pydoc/* at build time.
The binary package name is wrong. It should be python-swisseph, as per
Python Policy §2.2.
Upstream seems to support Python 3, too. Please consider building a
separate python3-swisseph package.
The is no source for PDFs in the doc/ directory. You have the following
options:
- Ask upstream to include the source in their tarballs.
- Repackage their tarballs.
If you choose the latter option, you could also get rid of unneeded
files that delete-no-longer-need-swe-files patch currently removes.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120229124946.ga4...@jwilk.net
Bug#661634: marked as done (RFS: fonts-play/1.002+20111215.1+ds1-1)
Your message dated Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:09:14 +0100 with message-id 1330528154.24068.30.camel@mas and subject line Fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #661634, regarding RFS: fonts-play/1.002+20111215.1+ds1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 661634: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661634 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors and pkg-fontsers, I am looking for a sponsor for my updated package fonts-play. * Package name: fonts-play Version : 1.002+20111215.1+ds2-1 Upstream Authors: Jonas Hecksher : Dave Crossland * URL : http://code.google.com/p/googlefontdirectory/source/browse/play/ * License : OFL-1.1 for font, Apache-2.0 for font-generation scripts Section : fonts It builds those binary packages: fonts-play - minimalistic sans serif typeface Changes: fonts-play (1.002+20111215.1+ds2-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Updated to build using separate googlefontdirectory-tools * Standards-Version 3.9.3 - Set final DEP-5 Format: link The Reason for the +ds2 is that the googlefontdirectory-tools stuff was removed from the tarball, plus that I already committed and tagged a bz2 tarball to the repo as +ds1, prior to learning that pristine-tar got some xz support :) The package is available at mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/package/fonts-play dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fonts-play/fonts-play_1.002+20111215.1+ds2-1.dsc Alternatively the source is kept in git at: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-fonts/fonts-play.git;a=tree git clone git://git.debian.org/pkg-fonts/fonts-play.git I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, -- Martin Erik Werner martinerikwer...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Marking as fixed since sponsored. -- Martin Erik Werner martinerikwer...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ---End Message---
Bug#661507: RFS: libblocxx/2.1.0-1 [ITP] BloCXX--C++ Framework for Application Development
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 *** UPDATE *** Added a symbols-file for libblocxx6. Added a dbg-pakage: * libblocxx-dbg - BloCXX debugging symbols Regards, Björn Esser Am 27.02.2012 19:27, schrieb Björn Esser: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package libblocxx * Package name: libblocxx Version : 2.1.0-1 Upstream Author : 2000-2009 Quest Software, Inc. 2005-2006 Novell, Inc. * URL : http://blocxx.sf.net/ * License : BSD-3-clause Section : libs It builds those binary packages: * libblocxx-dev - BloCXX development libraries, header files and documentation * libblocxx6 - BloCXX--C++ Framework for Application Development To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libblocxx Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libb/libblocxx/libblocxx_2.1.0-1.dsc Regards, Björn Esser -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk9OVIAACgkQ3u1SIc8s7PV0iAD/S1kIIIn/tobzIOeqdRTKZMri iPJzrUDYFYjn9gMdu04A/ivneHKFXx29aKRqkvpQ1eMqd0oAkeuD+uFH8k02MZlt =JIUG -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f4e5480.3050...@googlemail.com
Bug#661665: RFS: openastro.org/1.1.25-2 [ITP]
I don't intend to sponsor this package, but here's the review:
* Paul Elliott pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com, 2012-02-28, 18:32:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openastro.org/openastro.org_1.1.25-2.dsc
(Please see my reply to #661664. Many things I noted there applies to
this package, too. I won't mention them here again.)
Lintian emits:
P: openastro.org source: debian-control-has-unusual-field-spacing line 5
debhelper (= 7.0.50~) instead of debhelper (= 7.0.50) would be a
bit more friendly to backporters.
With dh_python2, you should use X-Python-Version, not XS-Python-Version.
Also, remove XB-Python-Version.
The package is arch:all, so there's no point including ${shlibs:Depends}
in Depends, as it won't be ever substituted.
Is there a reason for patching _comments_ in
0005-rename-openastro.py-as-required-by.patch? That looks strange.
When built with restrictive umask (e.g. 027), the package FTBFS:
| dh_fixperms
| chmod -x debian/openastro.org/usr/share/openastro.org/icons/aspects/*.svg
| chmod: debian/openastro.org/usr/share/openastro.org/icons/aspects/0.svg: new
permissions are rw-r--r-x, not rw-r--r--
| chmod: debian/openastro.org/usr/share/openastro.org/icons/aspects/120.svg:
new permissions are rw-r--r-x, not rw-r--r--
| chmod: debian/openastro.org/usr/share/openastro.org/icons/aspects/135.svg:
new permissions are rw-r--r-x, not rw-r--r--
| chmod: debian/openastro.org/usr/share/openastro.org/icons/aspects/144.svg:
new permissions are rw-r--r-x, not rw-r--r--
| chmod: debian/openastro.org/usr/share/openastro.org/icons/aspects/150.svg:
new permissions are rw-r--r-x, not rw-r--r--
| chmod: debian/openastro.org/usr/share/openastro.org/icons/aspects/180.svg:
new permissions are rw-r--r-x, not rw-r--r--
| chmod: debian/openastro.org/usr/share/openastro.org/icons/aspects/30.svg: new
permissions are rw-r--r-x, not rw-r--r--
| chmod: debian/openastro.org/usr/share/openastro.org/icons/aspects/45.svg: new
permissions are rw-r--r-x, not rw-r--r--
| chmod: debian/openastro.org/usr/share/openastro.org/icons/aspects/60.svg: new
permissions are rw-r--r-x, not rw-r--r--
| chmod: debian/openastro.org/usr/share/openastro.org/icons/aspects/72.svg: new
permissions are rw-r--r-x, not rw-r--r--
| chmod: debian/openastro.org/usr/share/openastro.org/icons/aspects/90.svg: new
permissions are rw-r--r-x, not rw-r--r--
| make[1]: *** [override_dh_fixperms] Error 1
Then, if I try to build it again it fails with:
| dpkg-source -b openastro.org-1.1.25
| dpkg-source: info: using source format `3.0 (quilt)'
| dpkg-source: info: building openastro.org using existing
./openastro.org_1.1.25.orig.tar.gz
| dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file openastro.py
| dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of file openastromod/swiss.py.orig
| dpkg-source: warning: executable mode 0700 of 'openastro' will not be
represented in diff
| dpkg-source: info: local changes detected, the modified files are:
| openastro.org-1.1.25/openastro
| dpkg-source: info: you can integrate the local changes with dpkg-source
--commit
| dpkg-source: error: aborting due to unexpected upstream changes, see
/tmp/openastro.org_1.1.25-2.diff.4r9kOA
| dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b openastro.org-1.1.25 gave error exit
status 2
Are the Python modules included in this package supposed to be used by
other software? If yes, then the package name should be
python-openastromod. If no, then please move them to a private
directory.
Version number passed to distutils.core.setup() contains a trailing
newline. Please report his to upstream.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120229172919.ga4...@jwilk.net
documentation for Convenience copies of code redundant regeneration?
My package's source tarball contains Convenience copies of code which I delete and instead link to the external library. Also in the source tarball is documentation for the convenience library in the form of .pdf and .html copied from the same source by the upsteam. I am the maintainer of the external library, and there, I regenerate this documentation from source, at the cost of considerable trouble. But in the package I am working on I simply delete references to the Convenience copies of code and its documentation and refer to it's location in the external package. Question: Must I regenerate this Convenience copies of Documentation from source, only to delete it, and refer to in externally, (where it IS regenerated from source). That is must I do a purely pro forma regeneration from source of something that is just going to be deleted and never used, of something that is regenerated from source in an external package? If it is OK, in this case, to just delete the pdfs and html, where should I note the problem? -- Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096 pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#660128: RFS: heybuddy/0.2.3-1 [ITP]
Dear Jakub and Benoît, Thanks for your help. I've learned quite a lot from fiddling with debhelper. There is a new revision of heybuddy up at mentors.debian.net: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/heybuddy/heybuddy_0.2.3-1.dsc I've solved these issues: * debian/watch. Typo. * debian/control. Spell checking stuff moved to suggests (yes, both are needed), bumped to 3.9.2. * Moved manpage to (1). * Now using dh $@ --with python2, with dh_auto_install overrides. It seems to work; correct me if anything is wrong. * Cleared the manpage from the stuff you told me (wrong copyright holder, AUTHORS and COPYRIGHT). It has also been rewritten. * Added #! and set -e to both postinst and prerm scripts. I hope /bin/bash is fine, or should it be /bin/sh? Stuff I haven't solved: - Modules are not re-byte-compiled when the default Python version changes. * How should I solve this? I understand the problem, but scroogling around hasn't shown me any tips. - In the same file, you run compileall unconditionally; I guess it should only run during configure. * Pardon my ignorance, but the link to the debian guide you attached doesn't give any kind of specific help and I have absolutely no idea as to how to solve this issue. I'm obviously open to more suggestions, and welcome any patience you put in this :-) Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#660128: RFS: heybuddy/0.2.3-1 [ITP]
* Daniel Martí danielmarti.deb...@gmail.com, 2012-02-29, 23:43: - Modules are not re-byte-compiled when the default Python version changes. * How should I solve this? I understand the problem, but scroogling around hasn't shown me any tips. The whole point of Python helpers (e.g. dh_python2) is to allow you not worry about such details. So just remove debian/postinst and debian/prerm; they are not needed anymore. But if you are curious how dh_python2 does it: it installs /usr/share/python/runtime.d/heybuddy.rtupdate into your binary package, which can be then called by python upon upgrade. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120229225831.ga...@jwilk.net
Re: documentation for Convenience copies of code redundant regeneration?
In your situation I would ask upstream to remove those convenience copies. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caktje6hyzw_hb0nh8yhdwd9np-n5koyzsowltz7mumy96uu...@mail.gmail.com
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 619933 by 660955 Bug #619933 [wnpp] gcc-4.6-doc: please upload to unstable Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 619933: 660955 merge 656044 619933 Bug#619933: gcc-4.6-doc: please upload to unstable Bug#656044: ITP: gcc-4.6-doc -- documentation for the GNU compilers Merged 619933 656044. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 656044: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=656044 619933: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619933 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13305654267064.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#661755: RFS: xserver-xorg-video-geode
Package: sponsorship-requests Version: 2.11.13-2~bpo60+1 Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for a BACKPORT of my package xserver-xorg-video-geode. * Package: xserver-xorg-video-geode Version: 2.11.13-2~bpo60+1 * License: BSD-type (see debian/copyright) Section: x11 It builds those binary packages: xserver-xorg-video-geode - X.Org X server -- Geode GX2/LX display driver xserver-xorg-video-geode-dbg - Geode GX2/LX display driver (debugging symbols) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/xserver-xorg-video-geode Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-video-geode/xserver-xorg-video-geode_2.11.13-2~bpo60+1.dsc I would be glad if someone with access to the BACKPORTS repository uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Martin-Éric Racine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120301015550.16918.46250.report...@eesti.lan
Re: RFS: libconfig (requires transition)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/02/12 18:45, Jonathan McCrohan wrote: I've fixed these and reuploaded 1.4.8-1 to mentors now. libconfig 1.4.8-1~exp1 is currently in experimental and I have now uploaded libconfig 1.4.8-2 to mentors.d.n. libconfig (1.4.8-2) unstable; urgency=low * Upload to unstable * Update to S-V 3.9.3 * debian/rules now uses dpkg-buildflags * Provide full transitional packages to help -dev package rename * Multiple lintian fixes - out-of-date-standards-version - copyright-with-old-dh-make-debian-copyright - extended-description-is-probably-too-short - unneeded-build-dep-on-quilt -- Jonathan McCrohan jmccro...@gmail.com Thu, 01 Mar 2012 02:11:47 + The following packages rebuild correctly and just need a binNMU: * flush * libffado * libguestfs * lldpad * meterec * qwo * yubiserver The following packages require a sourceful upload: * sitplus (#661403) The following packages are RC buggy and not in testing: * ldc A number of packages still have the old libconfig(++)8-dev package in their B-D. I have filed bug reports against these packages, but I guess these are not critical given that there is a transition package being provided too. As far as I can see, sitplus is the only package involved in other transitions. Once the opencv transition is over, am I ok so look for a sponsor to review and upload my package to unstable? Thanks, Jon -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPTuBLAAoJEJ6XA7Whh53b8ikH/AoIsPTbpzJECDpCmY27ACG4 XMZkbsKu790+p2zZ1wBrWZpGdD3vdjiG+OeQ+BZcdlD857VPJSWhw6z/KqGZ/WEH 2Hw1qnPatDPvSuSSJUvqFSv2vdy+SUHlY6UkXMdp1EYMWKmxqf4NWuycTGIfxDaF TaMctGmGMKqrY5B4nJBF4Rba9xe+WzdS+3jCt0DAU4wRI+K/8Mrl6R2Uo3pV/Sv4 yoi/qcYccpFqv7OSd36wOOB8hqVG/1kaSGjK3Yl3Kx5IIb2bsoSUQOALLZ0aa128 p/RVhDyFP2Rl01+gDen3qlvVEyZqwbN+UmYdTELHpXDemNcJAMpcMSLlcRCkWX0= =LuXU -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f4ee04b.3060...@gmail.com
