Bug#661507: RFS: libblocxx/2.3.0~svn544-1 [ITP] BloCxx - C++ Framework for Application Development
Hello Bart! The package is no longer at mentors. What happened ? I just recompiled on recent Sid and the result was broken then, even the testsuite segfaults. Since I'm not sure it's a problem with gcc 4.7 or the hardening flags (or both), I removed it, since I don't want to provide some crappy stuff on mentors. I'm currently looking forward to do some more research on this issue, find it's reason, if possible fix it and have a fixed / working package uploaded then. When a fixed package is uploaded to mentors, I'll drop you a line. I hope you would like to ITS, since as long it was on mentors no one was intended to. Best Regards, Björn Esser -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAMS3egpXXUA=iYXRyMdfKFMDoh5ggnmTjOF=jljuo0bghxo...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#675701: ptop/3.6.2-7
I wil ask then, What is wrong with linst architerues ? -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Bart Martens [mailto:ba...@master.debian.org] Namens Bart Martens Verzonden: zondag 3 juni 2012 7:50 Aan: Bas van den Dikkenberg CC: 675...@bugs.debian.org Onderwerp: RFS: ptop/3.6.2-7 Hi Bastiaan, Please have another look at the list of architectures. http://mentors.debian.net/package/ptop Uploaded: 2012-06-02 19:35 * Remove architechtures hurd-i386, kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 because they alway fail Architecture: amd64 armel armhf i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 s390x sparc sparc64 sh4 ppc64 powerpcspe m68k m68k armhf alpha https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ptop http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=ptop Also, have you tried asking help on debian-...@lists.debian.org and debian-h...@lists.debian.org ? Maybe you want to open a bug in the BTS to log all related information. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/B1AA70CF260D6446B5DBB7B8C7E4CED501C2D219@srv03.dikkenberg.local
Re: Getting rid of control messages revisited
On Thu, 24 May 2012 14:39:33 +0200, Arno Töll wrote: What about creating a list as owner of the pseudo-package dedicated to BTS traffic (including control messages) named sponsorship-requests@l.d.o. Furthermore, the mentors list should still get bug traffic (only). Therefore we would subscribe that list via PTS subscription to bug reports only [*]. How does that sound to you? Sounds ok and like a good solution for both people interested in control message and those wanting to ignore them. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Schmetterlinge: Die schlesischen Weber - H.Heine signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Getting rid of control messages revisited
Hi, Jakub asked me to forward his comment from IRC to thhis list (where he's not subscribed anymore as some might remember): 14:14 jwilk IME the problem with mailing lists that nobody reads is that from time to time some misguided people will post to them. Worse, they'll expect that somebody answers them... 14:15 jwilk But yeah, separate list + forwarding bugs to d-mentors is certainly better than status quo. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#675806: RFS: aseprite/0.9.2-1 [ITP] -- sprite and pixel art editor
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package aseprite * Package name: aseprite Version : 0.9.2-1 Upstream Author : David Capello davidcape...@gmail.com * URL : http://www.aseprite.org/ * License : GPL-2+ and BSD-3-clause Section : graphics It builds those binary packages: aseprite - sprite and pixel art editor To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/aseprite Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aseprite/aseprite_0.9.2-1.dsc Or browse the git repository: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-games/aseprite.git;a=summary More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.aseprite.org/ Regards, Tobias Hansen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fcb6159@gmx.de
Bug#673096: RFS: figlet/2.2.4-1
* Bart Martens ba...@debian.org, 2012-05-28, 10:06: This seems an easy solution for figlet 2.2.4-1 : ftp://ftp.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/ISO8859/8859-3.TXT The license attached to this file is non-free: at the very least it doesn't allow modifications and it discriminates against fields of endeavor. (Not that I think it matters, but some people participating in this thread seemed to think it's a Very Big Deal, so I thought I'll mention that.) -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120603123807.ga6...@jwilk.net
Bug#675811: RFS: rsskit/0.3-2
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I'm looking for a sponsor for my package rsskit. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rsskit/rsskit_0.3-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: rsskit (0.3-2) unstable; urgency=low * debian/rules (binary-arch): Invoke dh_makeshlibs. * debian/librsskit0.lintian-overrides: Add postinst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig and postrm-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig; typical false positives for GNUstep libraries. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87k3zoy0e0.GNUs_Not_Unix!%ya...@gnu.org
Bug#662026: RFS: shotdetect/1.0.86-1 [ITP]
Hi Giulio, - I don't think you should install AUTHORS; it contains a single name, and that information is in debian/copyright already. The NEWS file seems pretty useless as well. The README file is just plain confusing. Those files are not installed anymore. I just re-uploaded the package here: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/s/shotdetect/shotdetect_1.0.86-1.dsc are you sure about the new upload? At leaset these files are still in the generated deb-file!? Thorsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pine.lnx.4.64.1206031603060.14...@tor.gallien.in-chemnitz.de
Re: Bug#669585: RFS: bibtexconv/0.8.14-1 -- Looking for a Debian sponsor
Am Freitag, den 20.04.2012, 09:19 +0200 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre: Thomas, Couple of quick comments: * d/copyright does not contains copyrights for debian/* files. (Disclaimer:I did not check the package in question) I think this is no longer required from policy 3.9.3 on but correct me if I got the sentence at http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/upgrading-checklist.txt wrong. coldtobi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1338736145.3613.2.camel@moria
Re: d/copyright for mrtg-ping-probe (ITA)
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 09:14 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote: On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 16:47 -0400, Paul Gevers wrote: Please inspect the source files of the program to see what they state themselfs. The mrtg-ping-probe perl script itself explicitly references the COPYRIGHT file as follows [1]: See the file COPYRIGHT in the distribution for the exact terms. (as does the associated perl script check-ping-fmt, which doesn't get installed with the binary package). That COPYRIGHT file does not include the or (at your option) any later version phrasing. Because of that, I've decided to stay with the changes I made that list the programs license as GPL-2. Jame [1] http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/mrtg-ping-probe.git -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1338738983.30287.11.camel@svrpc
Re: d/copyright for mrtg-ping-probe (ITA)
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 20:25 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote: On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 16:47 -0400, Paul Gevers wrote: On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 14:18:52 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote: Note also that Lintian now complains about the FSF address in the first license entry, presumably because I copied it from the original source COPYRIGHT file. Since there is already information there [1] pointing to the GPL-2 copy in common licenses and that itself already includes information about contacting the FSF, I'm leaning towards removing that problem section that includes the FSF address from the new debian/copyright file. Please let upstream know. Upstream is, so far, out of contact... And still is. Even tried contacting him via facebook but no response there either as yet. Jame [1] http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/mrtg-ping-probe.git -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1338739486.30287.14.camel@svrpc
Processed: retitle to RFS: logsurfer/1.8-1 [ITP]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 671745 RFS: logsurfer/1.8-1 [ITP] Bug #671745 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: logsurfer/1.8-3 [ITP] Changed Bug title to 'RFS: logsurfer/1.8-1 [ITP]' from 'RFS: logsurfer/1.8-3 [ITP]' stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 671745: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=671745 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13387401239918.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#673096: RFS: figlet/2.2.4-1
On 03/06/12 13:38, Jakub Wilk wrote: The license attached to this file is non-free: at the very least it doesn't allow modifications and it discriminates against fields of endeavor. (Not that I think it matters, but some people participating in this thread seemed to think it's a Very Big Deal, so I thought I'll mention that.) Well given that these exact files are already in main, I don't think this matters, unless of course we want to move parts of xorg or syslinux to from the archive...? jmccrohan@lambda:/usr$ dpkg -L xfonts-utils | grep 8859 /usr/share/fonts/X11/util/map-ISO8859-4 /usr/share/fonts/X11/util/map-ISO8859-10 /usr/share/fonts/X11/util/map-ISO8859-5 /usr/share/fonts/X11/util/map-ISO8859-9 /usr/share/fonts/X11/util/map-ISO8859-13 /usr/share/fonts/X11/util/map-ISO8859-3 /usr/share/fonts/X11/util/map-ISO8859-11 /usr/share/fonts/X11/util/map-ISO8859-6 /usr/share/fonts/X11/util/map-ISO8859-7 /usr/share/fonts/X11/util/map-ISO8859-16 /usr/share/fonts/X11/util/map-ISO8859-15 /usr/share/fonts/X11/util/map-ISO8859-14 /usr/share/fonts/X11/util/map-ISO8859-1 /usr/share/fonts/X11/util/map-ISO8859-8 /usr/share/fonts/X11/util/map-ISO8859-2 jmccrohan@lambda:/usr$ md5sum /usr/share/fonts/X11/util/map-ISO8859-5 4c2e46c0b5c710935c6d48a96a930f55 /usr/share/fonts/X11/util/map-ISO8859-5 jmccrohan@lambda:/usr$ md5sum /usr/share/figlet/8859-5.flc 4c2e46c0b5c710935c6d48a96a930f55 /usr/share/figlet/8859-5.flc Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fcb8e23.7060...@gmail.com
Bug#675853: RFS: yaml-cpp/0.3.0-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package yaml-cpp * Package name: yaml-cpp Version : 0.3.0-1 Upstream Author : Jesse Beder be...@math.uiuc.edu * URL : http://code.google.com/p/yaml-cpp/ * License : X Section : devel It builds those binary packages: libyaml-cpp-dev - YAML parser and emitter for C++ - development files libyaml-cpp0.3 - YAML parser and emitter for C++ To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/yaml-cpp Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yaml-cpp/yaml-cpp_0.3.0-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://code.google.com/p/yaml-cpp/. Changes since the last upload: This is the initial upload of yaml-cpp package. The package is required by rivet [1]. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636983 Regards, Lifeng Sun -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120603172611.GM7471@string
Bug#675873: RFS: pam-shield/0.9.6-1 [ITA]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package pam-shield * Package name: pam-shield Version : 0.9.6-1 Upstream Author : Walter de Jong wal...@heiho.net and Jonathan Niehof jtnie...@gmail.com * URL : https://github.com/jtniehof/pam_shield * License : GPL2 Section : admin It builds those binary packages: libpam-shield - locks out remote attackers trying password guessing To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/pam-shield Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pam-shield/pam-shield_0.9.6-1.dsc The full git tree is available from: git://github.com/jtniehof/pam_shield.git (debian branch) Changes since the last upload: * New maintainer. (Closes: #572656). * Switch to dpkg-source 3.0 (quilt) format. * Bump Standards Version to 3.9.3.0. (No changes needed). * Update to debhelper 8. -dh_clean now handles *-stamp (7) -new dh_prep. (7) -no debhelper 8 specific changes * New homepage; updated watchfile. * Lintian fixups: -Add misc:Depends to control (debhelper-but-no-misc-depends) -Add override for INSTALL (package-contains-upstream-install-documentation) -Add DEP-3 headers to patches (quilt-patch-missing-description) * Rename cron job so run-parts will actually run it. * Support pam-auth-update. (Closes: #579514) * New upstream release: -Add manpage for shield.conf (Closes: #488847). -Ensure cron job does not return 0 (Closes: #563065). -Add --force option to shield-purge (Closes: #457642). -Wait for database if it isn't writable (Closes: #488841). -Modify shield-purge to work without arguments. -Fix a memory leak in shield-purge. -Fix shield-purge to traverse entire database. -Treat missing DNS parameters properly -Fix race condition (blocking same IP multiple times) -Continue on errors from read_config -Use IP blackhole routing to block -Optional ufw-based blocking Regards, Jonathan Niehof -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/canqxixoo-x+c8ssnkuwg59dqcovq28fnwwalo2gj01hlnar...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#662026: RFS: shotdetect/1.0.86-1 [ITP]
Hi Thorsten, Il 03/06/2012 16:06, Thorsten Alteholz ha scritto: Hi Giulio, - I don't think you should install AUTHORS; it contains a single name, and that information is in debian/copyright already. The NEWS file seems pretty useless as well. The README file is just plain confusing. Those files are not installed anymore. I just re-uploaded the package here: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/s/shotdetect/shotdetect_1.0.86-1.dsc are you sure about the new upload? At leaset these files are still in the generated deb-file!? You are right, that link still points to the upload you reviewed the first time: new uploads did not overwrote those file, due to the section change. The right url is: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/shotdetect/shotdetect_1.0.86-1.dsc Thank you again for looking at it. Bests, Giulio. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fcbc053.9050...@gmail.com
Bug#673600: RFS: nyancat/1.0+git20120519.5fe3de9-1
* Jonathan McCrohan jmccro...@gmail.com, 2012-06-03, 03:12: I've uploaded a new version to mentors.d.n with changes to the postinst based on Serafeim's suggestions. I think solves all of the remaining transition issues. You wrote: if [ fgrep -q -x ... -o fgrep -q -x ... ]; then This condition is always true (also: not very portable). You want this instead: if fgrep -q -x ... || fgrep -q -x ...; then -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120603195614.ga2...@jwilk.net
Bug#662026: RFS: shotdetect/1.0.86-1 [ITP]
Hi Giulio, On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, Giulio Paci wrote: You are right, that link still points to the upload you reviewed the first time: new uploads did not overwrote those file, due to the section change. oh, no, this has been my first time looking at that package. The right url is: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/shotdetect/shotdetect_1.0.86-1.dsc Is there a reason to use debhelper 7? The pedantic info from lintian goes away with something like: debhelper (=9),(of course you need to change debian/compat as well). If you use 'dh' in the rules file, dh9 should automatically take care of the hardening-stuff (this is a release goal for wheezy). I am sure that there is also a way for cdbs. So if you don't have a sponsor yet and let those complaints from lintian disappear, I will upload the package. Thorsten P: shotdetect source: package-lacks-versioned-build-depends-on-debhelper 7 N: N:The package either doesn't declare a versioned build dependency on N:debhelper or does not declare a versioned build dependency on a new N:enough version of debhelper to satisfy the declared compatibility level. N: N:Recommended practice is to always declare an explicit versioned N:dependency on debhelper equal to or greater than the compatibility level N:used by the package, even if the versioned dependency isn't strictly N:necessary. Having a versioned dependency also helps with backports to N:older releases and correct builds on partially updated systems. N: N:Refer to the debhelper(7) manual page for details. N: N:Severity: pedantic, Certainty: certain N: N:Check: debhelper, Type: source N: W: shotdetect: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/bin/shotdetect N: N:This package provides an ELF binary that lacks the use of fortified libc N:functions. Either there are no potentially unfortified functions called N:by any routines, all unfortified calls have already been fully validated N:at compile-time, or the package was not built with the default Debian N:compiler flags defined by dpkg-buildflags. If built using N:dpkg-buildflags directly, be sure to import CPPFLAGS. N: N:NB: Due to false-positives, Lintian ignores some unprotected functions N:(e.g. memcpy). N: N:Refer to http://wiki.debian.org/Hardening and N:http://bugs.debian.org/673112 for details. N: N:Severity: normal, Certainty: possible N: N:Check: binaries, Type: binary, udeb N: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pine.lnx.4.64.1206032217420.24...@tor.gallien.in-chemnitz.de
Processed: retitle to RFS: gemrb/0.7.0-5 [ITP] -- Open-source engine for Black Isle Studio#39;s RPGs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 668505 RFS: gemrb/0.7.0-5 [ITP] -- Open-source engine for Black Isle Studio#39;s RPGs Bug #668505 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: gemrb/0.7.0-2 [ITP] -- Open-source engine for Black Isle Studio's RPGs Changed Bug title to 'RFS: gemrb/0.7.0-5 [ITP] -- Open-source engine for Black Isle Studio#39;s RPGs' from 'RFS: gemrb/0.7.0-2 [ITP] -- Open-source engine for Black Isle Studio's RPGs' stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 668505: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668505 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133878325725399.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: ITP: gemrb -- Open-source engine to run Baldur's Gate, Icewind Dale series and Planescape: Torment
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 477376 by 668505 Bug #477376 [wnpp] ITP: gemrb -- A free reimplementation of the Infinity Engine 477376 was not blocked by any bugs. 477376 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 477376: 668505 merge 477376 658887 Bug #477376 [wnpp] ITP: gemrb -- A free reimplementation of the Infinity Engine Bug #658887 [wnpp] ITP: gemrb -- Open-source engine to run Baldur's Gate, Icewind Dale series and Planescape: Torment Merged 477376 658887 stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 477376: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=477376 658887: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658887 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133878922621430.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
