Queue of uploaded packages on m.d.n.
Hi, Is any problem with scripts on m.d.n.? I uploaded my package about 9 hours ago via http. And it was not processed yet. Sources are still in the directory for uploads (tested using dput). Best regards, Boris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/199791340261...@web27e.yandex.ru
Bug archiving
Hi list, I just re-inserted a package that was removed from Debian a year ago (saods9), and following some recommendations, I exhumated the old bugs and set them to fixed in the new version. Shall I archive them now again manually? Or is this done somehow automatically? What is this archived flag about? Best regards Ole -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ytz62al5d5t@news.ole.ath.cx
Re: Bug archiving
On 2012-06-21 09:37, Olе Streicher wrote: Hi list, I just re-inserted a package that was removed from Debian a year ago (saods9), and following some recommendations, I exhumated the old bugs and set them to fixed in the new version. Shall I archive them now again manually? Or is this done somehow automatically? What is this archived flag about? Best regards Ole Bugs are automatically archived as soon as the last affected version has been fixed (and the BTS is not confused[1]). I recommend using the bug page for the package; click Toggle all extra information and find the bug - if the bug will auto-archive it will have a Can be archived in X days. ~Niels [1] Happen in cases like fixed version == found version or if binNMU versions have been used. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fe2d0b0.6040...@thykier.net
Re: Queue of uploaded packages on m.d.n.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Boris Pek wrote: Is any problem with scripts on m.d.n.? I uploaded my package about 9 hours ago via http. And it was not processed yet. Sources are still in the directory for uploads (tested using dput). The importer was down, I've restarted it and it is processing the backlog. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caktje6e2hcjf2xdskow3jvjs9itaqjfjep5myd4jbnhpox-...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Queue of uploaded packages on m.d.n.
Processed moment ago. Thanks. 2012-06-21 09:51, Boris Pek wrote: Hi, Is any problem with scripts on m.d.n.? I uploaded my package about 9 hours ago via http. And it was not processed yet. Sources are still in the directory for uploads (tested using dput). Best regards, Boris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/275231340265...@web24h.yandex.ru
Bug#678368: RFS: libvisual/0.4.0-5 [QA] -- Audio visualization framework
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hi, (Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to debian-qa mailing list) I am looking for a sponsor for my package libvisual. It builds those binary packages: libvisual-0.4-0 - Audio visualization framework libvisual-0.4-0-i18n - Audio visualization framework (translation files) libvisual-0.4-dev - Audio visualization framework (development package) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libvisual Direct link for download: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libv/libvisual/libvisual_0.4.0-5.dsc Changes in the package: libvisual (0.4.0-5) unstable; urgency=low * QA upload. * Added debian/watch. * Updated debian/control: - fixed lintian warnings and notes: package-needs-versioned-debhelper-build-depends 9, no-homepage-field - added new package libvisual-0.4-0-i18n * Translation files were moved to new package libvisual-0.4-0-i18n: fixed bug with arch-dependent files in multiarch package. (Closes: #670031) * Updated debian/rules: fixed broken names of translation files. (Closes: #646964) * Added file debian/patches/fix-spelling-errors. * Updated files debian/patches/0*_fix: fixed lintian notes quilt-patch-missing-description. * Updated debian/copyright: file was rewritten in according to Copyright format 1.0. * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.3. I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Best regards, Boris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/276861340265...@web24h.yandex.ru
git, first later steps
Hi, I intent to set up a Git repository for my project. A source package is already available (see http://mentors.debian.net/package/bilibop). Now, at least five successive versions have been uploaded on mentors.debian.net. So, my question about Git is: should I start it from the initial release, or from the actual one ? I thought to start from the IR but I'm not sure, because it was not done in real time. What about ? Thanks, quidame -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/n1r-9y-loqo...@safe-mail.net
Bug#675532: RFS: bilibop/0.3.2 (ITP #675467)
Hi, Le 2012-06-17 19:42, intrigeri a écrit : Hopefully, I'll review this before the end of the month. Other potential sponsors: if you can be faster than me, please do. There is a new version (after tests on freshly installed systems): http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bilibop/bilibop_0.3.2.dsc Thanks, quidame -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/efec3b7d2dcc079432bc333161496...@poivron.org
Re: git, first later steps
On 06/21/2012 06:16 AM, bilibop project wrote: I intent to set up a Git repository for my project. A source package is already available (see http://mentors.debian.net/package/bilibop). Now, at least five successive versions have been uploaded on mentors.debian.net. So, my question about Git is: should I start it from the initial release, or from the actual one ? I thought to start from the IR but I'm not sure, because it was not done in real time. What about ? In my opinion, it is nice to have the history, although maybe not critical. As an example, I cloned Phil Kern's ca-certificates repository that had imported older versions that he started with. Then I imported all the intermediate versions to get it current with a good starting point that had some history. http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/ca-certificates.git;a=shortlog It does take a little time, but the history may be valuable at some point. Commit times of the imports don't really matter. -- Kind regards, Michael Shuler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fe327da.3090...@pbandjelly.org
Bug#678414: RFS: dwarftherapist/0.6.12+hg20120621-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package dwarftherapist * Package name: dwarftherapist Version : 0.6.12+hg20120621-1 Upstream Author : Justin Ehlert ehler...@gmail.com * URL : http://code.google.com/p/dwarftherapist/ * License : Expat Section : contrib/utils It builds those binary packages: dwarftherapist - Extension application for the game Dwarf Fortress To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/dwarftherapist Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/d/dwarftherapist/dwarftherapist_0.6.12+hg20120621-1.dsc Note that the package should be kept in sync with Dwarf Fortress releases (it can be mitigated locally by finding new .ini somewhere and placing them into appropriate locations but it is not very user-friendly) so ideally a sponsor should be ready to regularly sponsor newer versions. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#674291: Olena - packages updated
On 06/08/2012 06:00 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Guillaume Lazzara guillaume.lazz...@lrde.epita.fr wrote: Anyway why is the package on mentors so damn huge ! $ dget -u http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/olena/olena_2.0-1.dsc $ wget http://www.lrde.epita.fr/dload/olena/2.0/olena-2.0.tar.gz $ du -sh *.tar.gz 104M olena_2.0.orig.tar.gz 38M olena-2.0.tar.gz [...] Please get in touch with upstream and/or repack the source. ftpmasters will reject the package if it contains generated stuff (including documentation). We have cleaned up the package. It is now around 10MB. Thanks for your review again. -- Guillaume -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fe344b8.2090...@lrde.epita.fr
Processed: retitle to RFS: bilibop/0.3.2 (ITP #675467)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 675532 RFS: bilibop/0.3.2 (ITP #675467) Bug #675532 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: bilibop/0.3.1 (ITP #675467) Changed Bug title to 'RFS: bilibop/0.3.2 (ITP #675467)' from 'RFS: bilibop/0.3.1 (ITP #675467)' stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 675532: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675532 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13402952795674.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#678214: marked as done (RFS: qmpdclient/1.2.2-2)
Your message dated Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:14:22 + with message-id e1shk1w-0003o1...@ravel.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: qmpdclient/1.2.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #678214, regarding RFS: qmpdclient/1.2.2-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 678214: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678214 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package qmpdclient * Package name: qmpdclient Version : 1.2.2-2 Upstream Author : Voker57 voke...@gmail.com * URL : http://bitcheese.net/wiki/QMPDClient * License : GPL-2+ Section : sound It builds those binary packages: qmpdclient - Qt4 client for the Music Player Daemon (MPD) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/qmpdclient Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qmpdclient/qmpdclient_1.2.2-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Fix fr_FR translation, patch by Cédric Boutillier (Closes: #640505) * Fix Files: * paragraph in debian/copyright * Switch to debhelper level 9 * Enable all hardening options * Fix the 64x64 icon dimensions * Add a manpage * Bump Standards-Version: to 3.9.3 (no change needed) * Update the copyright format URL * Update copyright years -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package qmpdclient version 1.2.2-2 is in unstable now. http://packages.qa.debian.org/qmpdclient ---End Message---
Bug#677019: RFS: chordii
Hi Malcolm, http://mentors.debian.net/package/chordii Uploaded: 2012-02-25 23:28 The file /usr/share/doc/chordii/changelog.gz is no longer installed, and that is not mentioned in debian/changelog. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120621174419.ga18...@master.debian.org
Bug#677013: Debian time package sponsor?
The latest 'time' package release candidate is here: http://www.proulx.com/~bob/debian/pool/sid/main/time/2012-06-21/ -rw-r--r-- 1 16649 Jun 21 13:38 time_1.7-24.debian.tar.gz -rw-rw-r-- 1 1038 Jun 21 13:48 time_1.7-24.dsc -rw-r--r-- 1 12317 Jun 21 13:39 time_1.7-24_amd64.build -rw-rw-r-- 1 2468 Jun 21 13:48 time_1.7-24_amd64.changes -rw-r--r-- 1 32786 Jun 21 13:39 time_1.7-24_amd64.deb -rw-rw-r-- 1 103066 Aug 9 1997 time_1.7.orig.tar.gz I believe I have addresssed all of the concerns that were previously raised with the previous release candidate. Notably it has been converted to quilt and builds correctly using it. I sorted through the patches and split them out into individual patch files tagged using the new DEP3 tag format. The debhelper build system now builds using 'dh $@ --with autoreconf' and so those files are updated automatically at build time and are no longer part of the patch diffs. Thanks! Bob signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#663151: RFS: rhinote/0.7.4-2
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 09:12:40AM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: Have you forwarded these patches upstream? I planned to forward them as soon as the package was accepted into Debian, but as it’s apparently going to take very long I have done it yesterday. You changed priority from extra to option, but this is not documented in the changelog. I have updated the changelog to briefly explain the rationale behind the priority bump. The updated package is available from mentors.d.n, if anyone is interested. Thank you for taking a look at it! -- Andrea Bolognani e...@kiyuko.org Resistance is futile, you will be garbage collected. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
RFS: capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-17 (adopted; hardenend, 2. try)
Dear mentors, that is my second try searching for a sponsor my package. the old maintainer allowed an NMU, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653539#15 and after some mails in the last two weeks he allowed me to adopt his package because of lacking in time. So I am looking for a sponsor for my package capi4hylafax. * Package name: capi4hylafax Version : 1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-17 Upstream Author : AVM GmbH * URL : ftp://ftp.avm.de/tools/capi4hylafax.linux * License : GPL-2.0+ Section : comm It builds those binary packages: capi4hylafax - Faxing over CAPI 2.0 device The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: #647164 #653539 I have made the following tests: * compiling on i386 testing (successful) * compiling on amd64 testing (successful) * Check ready binary packages with piuparts (0.43) (successful) * Tests on two productive systems with Fritzcard PCI (fcpci) on amd64 and i386 (successful) For reviewing and testing all my files of the package are archived here: http://www.joonet.de/sources/capi4hylafax/deb/v13099svn300-17/ To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/capi4hylafax Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/capi4hylafax/capi4hylafax_01.03.00.99.svn.300-17.dsc I would be very glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Here is the updated changelog: capi4hylafax (1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-17) unstable; urgency=medium * New maintainer (adopted). * Move to source formate 3.0 (quilt). * Generate explicit patches of old source changes. * Fix configure.in to work with newer automake/autoconf. * Optimize some fprintf params (thanks to M. Muehlhoff). * Fix datatype issue: use __WORDSIZE for checking 64 bit arch. * debian/control: - Bump to Standards-Version 3.9.3. - Move to build dependency debhelper (= 8). - Move to build dependency libtiff-dev. - Remove old versions in dependencies. - Remove old conflicts field. - Add recommended targets build-arch and build-indep. - Enable hardenend build flags. Closes: #653539 - Add Vcs fields to new git repository. * Update postrm, preinst, prerm scripts. Remove old version checks. * Add udev rules file for creating /dev/faxCAPI symlink. * Move default logfile to /var/log/hylafax directory. * Add logrotate configuration for logfile. Closes: #647164 * Rename to filename capi4hylafax.init, move LSB INIT INFO to header and optimize dependencies in the header. * Fix small typo in manpage c2faxsend.1. * Update all automake/autoconf files (autoreconf). * Fix spelling errors in sources. * Add doc-base registration file with hints about documentation. * Rewrite copyright file (DEP-5 standard). * Add small manpage for faxsend script. -- Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de Sun, 17 Jun 2012 16:36:13 +0200 Regards, Joachim Wiedorn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120621223938.5d830...@jupiter.home
Bug#677622: RFS: dhelp/0.6.21 -- Debian online help [New version to also close #678055]
Hi, I have uploaded a new version of the dhelp package to also address bug #678055, which showed up shortly after my initial RFS. In case someone is reviewing the previous version of the package, the changes are located in only one file: src/dhelp_parse.rb (and also debian/changelog, of course). regards George Zarkadas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#677092: RFS: wmctrl/1.07-7 [ITA] -- control an EWMH/NetWM compatible X Window Manager
Hi Jeroen, thanks for adopting wmctrl! I would sponsor your package, but please fix the following small issues first: - use the current homepage in debian/watch - remove 03_makefile_prelibs.patch (it is not in debian/patches/series and does not work because either Makefile.in need to be patched or you need to call automake, e.g. by using dh_autoreconf). To get the intended feature, simply add to debian/rules: override_dh_auto_build: dh_auto_build -- LDFLAGS+=-Wl,--as-needed - not yet needed, but would be nice: copyright-format-1.0 Best regards, Johann Felix signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#678468: RFS: sgml-data/2.0.7 [RC] [QA] -- common SGML and XML data
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for my package sgml-data. It builds binary package: sgml-data - common SGML and XML data To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/sgml-data Direct link for download: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sgml-data/sgml-data_2.0.7.dsc The package is lintian-clean. I always check using: lintian -ivIE --pedantic *.changes Changes in the package: sgml-data (2.0.7) unstable; urgency=low * QA upload. * Bumped debhelper version to 9 (was 5.0.0); updated debian/compat. * Deleted file debian/postinst: it is generated automatically now. This fixes the problem with calling update-catalog in postinst. (Closes: #675488, #674913, #606038) * Now package sgml-data suggests package w3-recs instead of missing package doc-html-w3. (Closes: #612239) * Fixed such lintian warnings and notes: + sgml-data source: - package-file-is-executable debian/control - debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-arch - debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-indep - ancient-standards-version 3.8.3 (current is 3.9.3) - dh-clean-k-is-deprecated + sgml-data: - description-possibly-contains-homepage http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/ - conflicts-with-version sp (= 1.1.1-2) - possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Best regards, Boris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/750841340323...@web26e.yandex.ru
Bug#673457: RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5338.4-1 [ITP] -- translation files for Psi+
retitle 673457 RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5338.4-1 [ITP] -- translation files for Psi+ thanks Package was updated to new release. Current direct link for download: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/psi-plus-i18n/psi-plus-i18n_0.15.5338.4-1.dsc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/690021340324...@web6d.yandex.ru
Processed: Re: Bug#673457: RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5338.4-1 [ITP] -- translation files for Psi+
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 673457 RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5338.4-1 [ITP] -- translation files for Psi+ Bug #673457 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5333.2-1 [ITP] -- translation files for Psi+ Changed Bug title to 'RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5338.4-1 [ITP] -- translation files for Psi+' from 'RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5333.2-1 [ITP] -- translation files for Psi+' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 673457: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673457 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134032431725967.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
RSF: BDSup2Sub++/1.0.0-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package bdsup2sub++. Package: BDSup2Sub++ Version: 1.0.0-1 Upstream author: Adam Thomas-Murphy Source URL: https://github.com/amichaelt/BDSup2SubPlusPlus License: Apache Public License version 2 Section: Video It builds these binary packages: bdsup2sub++ - Subtitle conversion tool for image-based subtitles. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bdsup2sub++/bdsup2sub++_1.0.0-1.dsc
Processed: RFS: haxe and neko [ITA]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: clone 674483 -1 Bug #674483 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: haxe and neko [ITA] Bug 674483 cloned as bug 678480 retitle 674483 RFS: haxe/1:2.9+20120414-1 [ITA] Bug #674483 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: haxe and neko [ITA] Changed Bug title to 'RFS: haxe/1:2.9+20120414-1 [ITA]' from 'RFS: haxe and neko [ITA]' retitle -1 RFS: neko/1.8.2-1 [ITA] Bug #678480 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: haxe and neko [ITA] Changed Bug title to 'RFS: neko/1.8.2-1 [ITA]' from 'RFS: haxe and neko [ITA]' block 628948 by 674483 Bug #628948 [wnpp] ITA: haxe -- Compiler for the Web-oriented haXe programming language 628948 was not blocked by any bugs. 628948 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 628948: 674483 block 628939 by -1 Bug #628939 [wnpp] ITA: neko -- Virtual machine (byte code), interpreter and compiler 628939 was not blocked by any bugs. 628939 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 628939: 678480 stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 628939: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=628939 628948: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=628948 674483: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674483 678480: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678480 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134033895025109.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
