Re: [Multiarch-devel] Proper upgrade path for lib32v4l-{0,dev}?
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 10:01:28PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: currently my source package v4l-utils builds lib32v4l-0 and lib32v4l-dev packages on amd64. I'd like to get rid of them sooner than later and provide a proper upgrade path to multiarch packages. What's the best way to achieve this? Getting rid of reverse dependencies so these packages can be removed as unused, I think. Definitely. This is what was done in Ubuntu for the multiarch conversion. However, since lib32v4l-0 is usually installed because ia32-libs depends on it, and the skype-debian_4.0.0.7-1_amd64.deb package I downloaded from Skype's website depends on ia32-libs but not lib32v4l-0: maybe a better upgrade path would be given by letting ia32-libs-i386 depend on libv4l-0? The ia32-libs-i386 package depends on all libraries formerly included in ia32-libs (well, as far as they are still available), but not on the i386 counterparts of the various lib32* packages ia32-libs depended upon. This seems like a bug to me. I don't think it's a bug at all. Any amd64 package that required those other lib32 packages for operation should have had a direct dependency on them already, there's no reason that ia32-libs should continue to depend on them for the benefit of third-party packages with buggy dependency declarations. On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 10:27:34PM +0200, Gregor Jasny wrote: So to me the most appealing solution would be to drop the lib32v4l packages altogether and let those users that need the conversion install and configure these packages by hand. That would be my recommendation. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#680193: RFS: gnustep-base/1.22.1-3 [RC]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I'm looking for a sponsor for my package gnustep-base. This upload would fix #667868. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnustep-base/gnustep-base_1.22.1-3.dsc Changes since the last upload to unstable: gnustep-base (1.22.1-3) unstable; urgency=low * debian/patches/libobjc4.patch: New; fixes FTBFS with gcc-4.7 (Closes: #667868). * debian/patches/series: Update. * debian/control.m4 (libgnustep-base`'SOV_BASE-dbg) Recommends: Add libobjc4-dbg as alternative. * debian/control: Regenerate. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ipe3hhsl.GNUs_Not_Unix!%ya...@gnu.org
Bug#679420: marked as done (RFS: pdfposter/0.5.0-1)
Your message dated Wed, 4 Jul 2012 17:42:09 +0200 with message-id 20120704154208.gb9...@genesis.home.trueelena.org and subject line uploaded has caused the Debian Bug report #679420, regarding RFS: pdfposter/0.5.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 679420: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679420 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, Since the sponsor of my other package seems to be busy, I am looking for a sponsor for my package pdfposter This upload adopts the package, updates it to the latest upstream release and to current packaging practices and closes 3 small but long lived (1-2 years) bugs. * Package name: pdfposter Version : 0.5.0-1 Upstream Author : Hartmut Goebel h.goe...@goebel-consult.de * URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/pdftools.pdfposter/ * License : GPL-3 Section : python It builds those binary packages: pdfposter - scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/pdfposter Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pdfposter/pdfposter_0.5.0-1.dsc Regards, Elena Grandi ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Uploaded by the sponsor of my other package. -- Elena ``of Valhalla'' Grandi ---End Message---
Bug#680193: marked as done (RFS: gnustep-base/1.22.1-3 [RC])
Your message dated Wed, 4 Jul 2012 08:15:05 -0700 with message-id 20120704151505.ga13...@ftbfs.org and subject line Re: Bug#680193: RFS: gnustep-base/1.22.1-3 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #680193, regarding RFS: gnustep-base/1.22.1-3 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 680193: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680193 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I'm looking for a sponsor for my package gnustep-base. This upload would fix #667868. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnustep-base/gnustep-base_1.22.1-3.dsc Changes since the last upload to unstable: gnustep-base (1.22.1-3) unstable; urgency=low * debian/patches/libobjc4.patch: New; fixes FTBFS with gcc-4.7 (Closes: #667868). * debian/patches/series: Update. * debian/control.m4 (libgnustep-base`'SOV_BASE-dbg) Recommends: Add libobjc4-dbg as alternative. * debian/control: Regenerate. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 02:44:42PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: I'm looking for a sponsor for my package gnustep-base. This upload would fix #667868. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnustep-base/gnustep-base_1.22.1-3.dsc Changes since the last upload to unstable: gnustep-base (1.22.1-3) unstable; urgency=low * debian/patches/libobjc4.patch: New; fixes FTBFS with gcc-4.7 (Closes: #667868). * debian/patches/series: Update. * debian/control.m4 (libgnustep-base`'SOV_BASE-dbg) Recommends: Add libobjc4-dbg as alternative. * debian/control: Regenerate. I've uploaded this package. -- Matt Kraai https://ftbfs.org/kraai ---End Message---
Bug#679739: marked as done (RFS: ia32-libs/20120701 [RC])
Your message dated Wed, 04 Jul 2012 16:20:28 + with message-id e1smsjx-0004v7...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: ia32-libs/20120701 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #679739, regarding RFS: ia32-libs/20120701 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 679739: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679739 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package ia32-libs: Package name: ia32-libs Version : 20120701 Upstream Author : Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de URL : NA License : GPL Section : oldlibs It builds those binary packages: ia32-libs - Transitional package to migrate ia32-libs to multiarch ia32-libs-i386 - Transitional package to migrate ia32-libs to multiarch To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/ia32-libs Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/ia32-libs/ia32-libs_20120701.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://bugs.debian.org/679671 Changes since the last upload: * Drop dependency on removed libdb4.8 [ROM] (Closes: #679671) Regards, Goswin -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package ia32-libs version 20120701 is in unstable now. http://packages.qa.debian.org/ia32-libs ---End Message---
Bug#680257: RFS: gnustep-base/1.22.1-4 [RC]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important The recently uploaded 1.22.1-3 FTBFS on all x86 archs because Debian autobuilders attempt to use the build-arch target and patches are not applied in this case. A trivial fix is included, apologies for the snafu. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnustep-base/gnustep-base_1.22.1-4.dsc Changes: gnustep-base (1.22.1-4) unstable; urgency=low * debian/rules (build-arch): Depend on the patch target to ensure that patches are applied when the package is built by the official buildds. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87hatnh40h.GNUs_Not_Unix!%ya...@gnu.org
Bug#677507: marked as done (RFS: terminal.app/0.9.8-1)
Your message dated Wed, 4 Jul 2012 09:30:33 -0700
with message-id 20120704163033.ga13...@ftbfs.org
and subject line Uploaded terminal.app/0.9.8-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #677507,
regarding RFS: terminal.app/0.9.8-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
677507: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677507
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package terminal.app.
This upload would fix #639040.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/terminal.app/terminal.app_0.9.8-1.dsc
Changes:
terminal.app (0.9.8-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release:
+ Fixes FTBFS with ld that defaults to --as-needed (Closes: #639040).
* TerminalParser_LinuxPrefs.m:
* TerminalView.m (-initWithFrame:):
* TerminalViewPrefs.m:
* ServicesPrefs.m: Revert all direct modifications.
* debian/control (Maintainer, Uploaders): Make the team maintainer, add
myself.
(Section): Change to `gnustep'.
(Build-Depends): Require debhelper = 8. Remove version requirement
for libgnustep-gui-dev. Add dpkg-dev (= 1.16.1~) and imagemagick.
Drop gnustep-make.
(Homepage): Point to the new location.
(Vcs-Git, Vcs-Browser): New fields.
(Conflicts, Replaces): Remove, no longer needed.
(Depends): Add ${misc:Depends}.
(Standards-Version): Claim compliance with 3.9.3 as of this release.
* debian/compat: Bump to 8.
* debian/rules: Get rid of gs_make. Enable hardening, verbose builds,
support for `noopt'.
(d_app): New convenience variable.
(build-stamp): Convert the app icon in XPM format.
(clean): Delete the generated icon.
(install): Replace the deprecated `dh_clean -k' with dh_prep. Don't
install lintian overrides. Install the XPM icon.
(binary-arch): Remove unnecessary arguments to dh_installman and
dh_shlibdeps. Move arch-independent Resources to /usr/share.
* debian/source/format: New file; set format to 3.0 (quilt).
* debian/overrides: Delete.
* debian/prerm: Don't ignore errors.
* debian/preinst:
* debian/watch: New file.
* debian/menu: Add icon.
* debian/Terminal.desktop: Make it valid. Add Bulgarian translation.
* debian/Terminal.1: Fix errors from man. Update homepage.
* debian/docs: Delete; duplicated by the manpage.
* debian/copyright: Switch to format 1.0, update copyright years, add
many copyright holders.
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Hi,
I've uploaded terminal.app 0.9.8-1.
--
Matt Kraai
https://ftbfs.org/kraai
---End Message---
Bug#680257: marked as done (RFS: gnustep-base/1.22.1-4 [RC])
Your message dated Wed, 4 Jul 2012 10:29:00 -0700 with message-id 20120704172900.ga13...@ftbfs.org and subject line Re: Bug#680257: RFS: gnustep-base/1.22.1-4 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #680257, regarding RFS: gnustep-base/1.22.1-4 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 680257: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680257 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important The recently uploaded 1.22.1-3 FTBFS on all x86 archs because Debian autobuilders attempt to use the build-arch target and patches are not applied in this case. A trivial fix is included, apologies for the snafu. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnustep-base/gnustep-base_1.22.1-4.dsc Changes: gnustep-base (1.22.1-4) unstable; urgency=low * debian/rules (build-arch): Depend on the patch target to ensure that patches are applied when the package is built by the official buildds. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 07:42:22PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: The recently uploaded 1.22.1-3 FTBFS on all x86 archs because Debian autobuilders attempt to use the build-arch target and patches are not applied in this case. A trivial fix is included, apologies for the snafu. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnustep-base/gnustep-base_1.22.1-4.dsc Changes: gnustep-base (1.22.1-4) unstable; urgency=low * debian/rules (build-arch): Depend on the patch target to ensure that patches are applied when the package is built by the official buildds. I've uploaded this package. -- Matt Kraai https://ftbfs.org/kraai ---End Message---
Bug#680141: RFS: liblastfm/0.4.0~git20090710-2 [RC]
I'm concerned by the following lintian warnings on mentors, which I can reproduce locally: W: liblastfm-fingerprint0: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblastfm_fingerprint.so.0.4.0 W: liblastfm0: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblastfm.so.0.4.0 Other than that, this seems reasonable so far! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1341424965-sup-4...@rose.makesad.us
Bug#680141: RFS: liblastfm/0.4.0~git20090710-2 [RC]
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 02:03:57PM -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote: I'm concerned by the following lintian warnings on mentors, which I can reproduce locally: W: liblastfm-fingerprint0: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblastfm_fingerprint.so.0.4.0 W: liblastfm0: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblastfm.so.0.4.0 Other than that, this seems reasonable so far! Yes, those warnings concern me too. The build uses -O2 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2, but running hardening-check --verbose on each of the libraries shows this: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblastfm.so.0.4.0: Position Independent Executable: no, regular shared library (ignored) Stack protected: yes Fortify Source functions: no, only unprotected functions found! unprotected: strncpy unprotected: fread Read-only relocations: yes Immediate binding: no, not found! /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblastfm_fingerprint.so.0.4.0: Position Independent Executable: no, regular shared library (ignored) Stack protected: yes Fortify Source functions: no, only unprotected functions found! unprotected: memset unprotected: memmove unprotected: memcpy Read-only relocations: yes Immediate binding: no, not found! I don't know which of these--if any--are false positives. Any help would be appreciated. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120704193041.GA22142@panurge
Bug#677354: marked as done (RFS: hyperestraier/1.4.13-5 [RC])
Your message dated Wed, 04 Jul 2012 19:36:19 + with message-id e1smvn5-0007cr...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: hyperestraier/1.4.13-5 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #677354, regarding RFS: hyperestraier/1.4.13-5 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 677354: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677354 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package hyperestraier * Package name: hyperestraier Version : 1.4.13-5 Upstream Author : Mikio Hirabayashi mi...@fallabs.com * URL : http://fallabs.com/hyperestraier/ * License : LGPL-2.1+ Section : text It builds those binary packages: hyperestraier - full-text search system for communities libestraier-dev - full-text search system Libraries [development] libestraier-java - Hyper Estraier Node API Libraries for Java libestraier-perl - Hyper Estraier node API Libraries for Perl libestraier-ruby - Hyper Estraier Node API Libraries for Ruby (transitional package) libestraier-ruby-doc - Hyper Estraier Node API Libraries for Ruby doc (transitional pack libestraier-ruby1.8 - Hyper Estraier Node API Libraries for Ruby 1.8 (transitional pack libestraier-ruby1.9.1 - Hyper Estraier Node API Libraries for Ruby 1.9.1 (transitional pa libestraier8 - full-text search system Libraries [runtime] ruby-hyperestraier - Hyper Estraier Node API Libraries for Ruby ruby-hyperestraier-doc - Hyper Estraier Node API Libraries for Ruby (documentation) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/hyperestraier Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hyperestraier/hyperestraier_1.4.13-5.dsc This update fixes RC bug to drop building java bindings for some architectures. cf. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673164 Changes since the last upload: * Drop to build Java binding in some Archs. (Closes: #673164) * Apply hardening build flags. regards, -- KURASHIKI Satoru -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package hyperestraier version 1.4.13-4 is accepted. http://packages.qa.debian.org/hyperestraier ---End Message---
libircclient packaging (Chances to get it into Wheezy)?
Hey I have done some work on the recently orphaned libircclient package, (O/ITA: at [1]), updated it to the latest release, updated packaging to current standards, and amongst other things made it Multiarch aware, and enabled hardening in the build. (It hadn't been updated since 2009 previously, so there were quite some stuff to do). See [2] for details on my changes. This involves a minor transition (If I've got it right, two packages are reverse dependencies of libircclient.) I have tried it out with megaglest [3], which builds and runs fine and I am testing the other reverse dependency pokerth [4] right now (Those builds are quite massive...) But I am not a DD and need a sponsor to get it uploaded. Would anybody be interested in this, and perhaps help out getting a freeze exception so that we don't have to be stuck with this aged package for a complete release cycle? Regarding team maintenance - The two packages that depends on libircclient are games-team maintained, but I don't know about libircclient - IRC clients are used in quite a lot of places other than games, right? Do you think there is any chance to get this into Wheezy? (CC'ing my standard sponsor - Are you interested in this, or are you busy with release-related work, Niels?) Help would be very much appreciated - /Andreas gus...@gusnan.se [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674882 [2] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/libircclient.git [3] http://packages.debian.org/megaglest [4] http://packages.debian.org/pokerth signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: libircclient packaging (Chances to get it into Wheezy)?
On 2012-07-04 22:14, Andreas Rönnquist wrote: Hey Hi, I have done some work on the recently orphaned libircclient package, (O/ITA: at [1]), updated it to the latest release, updated packaging to current standards, and amongst other things made it Multiarch aware, and enabled hardening in the build. (It hadn't been updated since 2009 previously, so there were quite some stuff to do). See [2] for details on my changes. [...] Would anybody be interested in this, and perhaps help out getting a freeze exception so that we don't have to be stuck with this aged package for a complete release cycle? [...] Do you think there is any chance to get this into Wheezy? (CC'ing my standard sponsor - Are you interested in this, or are you busy with release-related work, Niels?) While I appreciate your changes and that you are picking up an orphaned package, I fear the changes are too much for unstable given that Wheezy is frozen. This is especially true if it involves a transition that has not been pre-approved. I am open to sponsoring minimal changes to the existing package where permitted by the freeze policy (see [1]). Or even uploading the new version to experimental. Help would be very much appreciated - /Andreas gus...@gusnan.se [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674882 [2] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/libircclient.git [3] http://packages.debian.org/megaglest [4] http://packages.debian.org/pokerth ~Niels [1] http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ff4a93e.1090...@thykier.net
Bug#659522: RFS: prelink/0.0.20111012-1 [QA upload] - ELF prelinking utility to speed up dynamic linking
Hi Daniel, The package at mentors is no longer there. What happened ? Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120705044153.ga9...@master.debian.org
Bug#677491: marked as done (RFS: narval/1.14.3-1)
Your message dated Thu, 5 Jul 2012 04:45:07 + with message-id 20120705044507.gb9...@master.debian.org and subject line RFS: narval/1.14.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #677491, regarding RFS: narval/1.14.3-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 677491: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677491 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package narval * Package name: narval Version : 1.14.3-1 Upstream Author : xavier.gr...@ipno.in2p3.fr * URL : http://narval.in2p3.fr * License : GPL-2+ Section : science It builds those binary packages: libnarval-dbg - Ada framework for Distributed Acquisition Systems (debug) libnarval1.14.3 - Ada framework for Distributed Acquisition Systems (runtime) libnarval2-dev - Ada framework for Distributed Acquisition Systems (development) narval-doc - Ada framework for Distributed Acquisition Systems (doc) narval-generic-actors - Ada framework for Distributed Acquisition Systems (generic actors narval-servers - Ada framework for Distributed Acquisition Systems (servers) narval-tests-actors - Ada framework for Distributed Acquisition Systems (tests actors) narval-utils - Ada framework for Distributed Acquisition Systems (utils) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/narval Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/narval/narval_1.14.3-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * new upstream version * build with gnat-4.6 * Take new gcc-multilib scheme into account - put libs in /usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIHARCH) - modify control file accordingly Regards, Grave Xavier -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJP2bT8AAoJEG3iFwasTcfaksUP/RiVVcTyx3Dm/SaeCf/NN7VL 5BTUFf910awGxs/u5gF26DKnZaogR/BaKNxbKFkjoI19kDjoVUzePrblM2iDggJF CkWHV5y95PyYw/vT9104k7VMHSYvxhND99fm97iSvEJ3ww7x3U0Oa8P+WcaL0BUn 2nrFJ8ZeIfjO/AXGmPhZvN/0k5XnNY8uKIwDqfEmv7fJw7vPUt2tdHhJFyik3E82 5RWI/x5dF691YSgaLhkZb4sMq5yomfCB2Dn7dXPmb4TurtND40rvK9tcspiq+xrL EoCyn9IAf5J1BWMk8aQFi7B2xWhnqqfsWbTbzbJU7Zhr89fLNMwHnecj7WaF4lFE G8sDY+TpkEDLMleQc1Em1fqeOWsRL8eUSdQ8vlED+xWfOwINt0ZEIWlDjQ2fJeMH DcTFVJk1PbvJFvNLqxXFXnLzNsqXfJ5pDK7pj9mNDHwEZ7LBwO4U8IeY17SOdP6E se8lkESAKaGGU2wWUcnpf/AOHpOXu/DuI+PRotBWey8WwQ1iUvWmXKRrMNH0RYqX ZqN+uV3kkykYb1/SUUeUCzh60sgxWyfbnc8VFX2SM04oKX+kctPFl3X2eu1b5orz QjIl11anzRCYHz2Fm0kAwpydG37SdyC9E0OuwWJGGIgQHARheCngnYMPbUZ/0Xf1 RCok2N5qBdRQJIZRiCBU =Z6S8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi Xavier, You can take your time to work on this further. I'm closing this RFS now because there is currently no package to sponsor. Let's reopen it when the package at mentors is back. Regards, Bart Martens ---End Message---
