Re: logkeys in Debian

2012-08-18 Thread Vedran Furač
On 08/16/2012 07:31 PM, Bart Martens wrote:

 On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 06:48:24PM +0200, Vedran Furač wrote:
 http://mentors.debian.net/package/logkeys

 But it doesn't work for me, logkeys uses 100% CPU and doesn't log
 anything, at least on Sid (someone please test).
 
 I don't see an open bug about this problem uses 100% CPU.
 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=logkeys

Hmm, should I file a bug report against a package from mentors? Since
current package from stable works on stable and package from
testing/unstable works on testing/unstable.

Regards,
Vedran


attachment: vedran_furac.vcf

Re: [poke] RFS: xinetd

2012-08-18 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
Heya,


On 17 August 2012 14:44, Salvo Tomaselli tipos...@tiscali.it wrote:
 Let me know about the patches.
 I've uploaded the corrected version
 http://galileo.dmi.unict.it/~ltworf/xinetd/xinetd_2.3.14-8~exp1.dsc

 Thanks for the help.


I jumped out of bound and did upload -8 into experimental.

Oh, well. I should fix this mess now =)

I will take your -8~exp1 and upload as -9~exp1, not that -8 has landed
into experimental.

Sorry for the mess =)

Regards,
Dmitrijs.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/canbhluhmqoujq-9brtjjsb6adlr7hiv40mkil8d-wmlhyxg...@mail.gmail.com



Re: logkeys in Debian

2012-08-18 Thread Bart Martens
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 02:20:20PM +0200, Vedran Furač wrote:
 On 08/16/2012 07:31 PM, Bart Martens wrote:
 
  On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 06:48:24PM +0200, Vedran Furač wrote:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/logkeys
 
  But it doesn't work for me, logkeys uses 100% CPU and doesn't log
  anything, at least on Sid (someone please test).
  
  I don't see an open bug about this problem uses 100% CPU.
  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=logkeys
 
 Hmm, should I file a bug report against a package from mentors? Since
 current package from stable works on stable and package from
 testing/unstable works on testing/unstable.

I have compared 0.1.0-1 with 1:0.1.0-2 and at first sight I don't see
differences that could introduce the problem uses 100% CPU.  Are you sure
that this problem is not in 0.1.0-1 ?

Some changes are not mentioned in debian/changelog (bump Standards-Version,
addition of Depends: kbd | console-tools, changes in debian/copyright).  I
suggest to revert any changes that may conflict with the freeze policy or
document them well in debian/changelog with the bug numbers.

Regards,

Bart Martens


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120818145252.ga7...@master.debian.org



Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-08-18 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 20:46 Thu 16 Aug , Jakub Wilk wrote:
 * Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-07-30, 21:56:
 It doesn't look like it's suitable for wheezy, so please make it
 s/unstable/experimental/.
 Done! When it should be moved to unstable? After wheezy release?
 
 Yes, after wheezy is released.

Okay

 +-$ $(tabbed -d /tmp/tabbed.xid); urxvt -embed $(/tmp/tabbed.xid);
 ++$ $(tabbed \-d /tmp/tabbed.xid); urxvt \-embed $(/tmp/tabbed.xid);
 If you're fixing this, please also fix the security hole
 (insecure use of temporary files).
 Done too
 
 So it's now:
 
 TMPFILE=$(mktemp \-\-tmpdir tabbedxid.XXX);$(tabbed \-d  ${TMPFILE});urxvt 
 \-embed $(${TMPFILE})
 
 which is certainly better from security perspective, but not
 necessarily from usability one. I think the reason for storing xid
 in a file with predictable name was that it allowed you to connect
 more than one urxvt to the same tabbed. So I think that:
 1) TMPFILE is a bad variable name for this purpose;
 2) you could have saved one level of indirection by storing tabbed
 -d output directly into the variable (rather than into temporary
 file);
 3) perhaps it would make more sense to use a file somewhere in
 $HOME.

Well yes that line looks most ugly :-). Now I'm choosing 2nd option
given by you and patch is cleaned up.

 
 +  @cd /tmp
 +  @tar -cvf - suckless-tools_$(CURRENT_VERSION) 2 /dev/null | gzip -9  
 ../suckless-tools_$(CURRENT_VERSION).orig.tar.gz
 +  @rm -rf /tmp/suckless-tools_$(CURRENT_VERSION)
 This creates temporary files insecurely.
 Fixed.
 
 I see you did this:
 
 get-orig-source: TMPDIR :=$(shell (mktemp --tmpdir -d suckless-tools.))
 
 It looks like a nice hack, but... it will create a temporary
 directory every time debian/rules is run (not only for the
 get-orig-source target).


Since it was with get-orig-source: target I thought like all Makefiles
it should be called only when we do debian/rules get-orig-source but
looks like it creates directory even when I call debian/rules clean
which I don't understand why! Do you have any other alternatives for
this? and possibly reason why its being called on targets other than
get-orig-source?

I actually used this method from git-flow package of course its not
creating any TMPDIR but it does same for setting one variable. I asked
the package owner and he told that is only way to set the variable (or
at least that is what I interpreted )

Note: I referred git-flow because its also multi source package

I've pushed the changes and waiting for your comments

With Regards
-- 
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net}
IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net}
GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4  C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: logkeys in Debian

2012-08-18 Thread Vedran Furač
On 08/18/2012 04:52 PM, Bart Martens wrote:

 On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 02:20:20PM +0200, Vedran Furač wrote:
 On 08/16/2012 07:31 PM, Bart Martens wrote:

 On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 06:48:24PM +0200, Vedran Furač wrote:
 http://mentors.debian.net/package/logkeys

 But it doesn't work for me, logkeys uses 100% CPU and doesn't log
 anything, at least on Sid (someone please test).

 I don't see an open bug about this problem uses 100% CPU.
 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=logkeys

 Hmm, should I file a bug report against a package from mentors? Since
 current package from stable works on stable and package from
 testing/unstable works on testing/unstable.
 
 I have compared 0.1.0-1 with 1:0.1.0-2 and at first sight I don't see
 differences that could introduce the problem uses 100% CPU.  Are you sure
 that this problem is not in 0.1.0-1 ?

Problem exists with 0.1.0-1 from stable as well when running under
current unstable (though this situation would be rare as barely anyone
would run packages from stable on an unstable Debian).

Regards,
Vedran


attachment: vedran_furac.vcf

Bug#685077: marked as done (RFS: cvc3/2.4.1-4 [RC])

2012-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 19 Aug 2012 04:20:06 +
with message-id e1t2wze-0008a0...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: cvc3/2.4.1-4 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #685077,
regarding RFS: cvc3/2.4.1-4 [RC]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
685077: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685077
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the latest version of my package
cvc3. The version fixes release-critical bugs in cvc3-el.

Package name : cvc3
Version : 2.4.1-4
Upstream Author : Clark Barrett
URL : http://www.cs.nyu.edu/acsys/cvc3/
License : BSD
Section : math

It builds those binary packages:

cvc3 - Automatic theorem prover for SMT problems
cvc3-el - Emacs mode for CVC3
libcvc3-5 - Automatic theorem prover library for SMT problems
libcvc3-5-java - Java bindings for CVC3 (bytecode library)
libcvc3-5-jni - Java bindings for CVC3 (native library)
libcvc3-dev - Automatic theorem prover library for SMT problems
(development files)

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/cvc3

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cvc3/cvc3_2.4.1-4.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

cvc3 (2.4.1-4) unstable; urgency=low

  * Transfer package repo to Git.
  * Fix syntax errors in debian/copyright.
  * Keep 50cvc3-el.el after remove. (Closes: #684351)
  * Use ln -sf when linking cvc3-el emacsen files. (Closes: #684026)
  * Remove build dep on gcj-native-helper. (Closes: #678183)

 -- Christopher L. Conway ccon...@cs.nyu.edu  Sun, 12 Aug 2012 17:15:51
-0400

Regards,
Chris
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Package cvc3 version 2.4.1-4 is in unstable now.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/cvc3---End Message---