RFS: rsplib/3.0.0~rc2-1
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package rsplib. RSPLIB is the Open Source implementation (GPLv3) of the IETF's new framework for Reliable Server Pooling (RSerPool), which is described in RFC 5351 to RFC 5356. If you a looking for a Grid compution solution which is simple, easy to setup and mostly self- configuring, you are probably looking for RSerPool! The RSerPool framework provides lightweight protocols and functionalities for the management of server pools and sessions between users and pools. In particular, RSerPool can be used for highly available applications and for load distribution and load balancing in server pools. Its API is simple to use and understand, making the development of own distributed applications very easy. Details on RSerPool and the RSPLIB implementation can be found on the project's website: http://tdrwww.iem.uni-due.de/dreibholz/rserpool/ . * Package name: rsplib Version : 3.0.0~rc2-1 Upstream Author : Thomas Dreibholz dre...@iem.uni-due.de * URL : http://tdrwww.iem.uni-due.de/dreibholz/rserpool/ * License : GPL, version 3 Section : net It builds these binary packages: libcpprspserver-dev - headers of the C++ RSerPool client/server API library libcpprspserver2 - C++ RSerPool client/server API library librsplib-dev - headers of the RSerPool client/server API library rsplib librsplib2 - RSerPool client/server API library for session management rsplib-dbg - Debug symbols of the RSerPool programs rsplib-docs - documentation of the RSerPool implementation rsplib rsplib-fgp-cfgfiles - RSerPool Fractal Generator Service example input files rsplib-legacy-wrappers - RSerPool legacy names rsplib-registrar - RSerPool Registrar service rsplib-services - RSerPool example services rsplib-tools - RSerPool test tools The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 516750 To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/rsplib Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rsplib/rsplib_3.0.0~rc2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Thomas Dreibholz signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#690245: RFS: zgv/5.9-6 [QA] -- SVGAlib graphics viewer
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for the package zgv. It builds one binary package: zgv - SVGAlib graphics viewer Direct link for download: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zgv/zgv_5.9-6.dsc Other links: http://mentors.debian.net/package/zgv http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/zgv.git Changes in the package: zgv (5.9-6) unstable; urgency=low * QA upload. * Update debian/control: - add Vcs-* fields (Git repo in collab-maint is available now) - changed build dependency from libtiff4-dev to libtiff-dev (preparation for switching to libtiff5 in Debian Jessie) * Update debian/rules: - delete unnecessary override_dh_strip section - fix get-orig-source section in according with Debian Policy §4.9 To prevent possible questions: Yes, this updated package is not for Wheezy, it is for Jessie. But current version (5.9-5) from unstable will not migrate to Wheezy in any case, so it can be replaced by new one. I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Best regards, Boris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/21761349966...@web17e.yandex.ru
Bug#689715: Review of eyefiserver-2.3~rc1-1
Salut On Wednesday 10 October 2012 19:59:11 Vincent Fourmond wrote: * I don't see the point of including session dumps - especially 4MB of them ! Absolutely. Done. I did not change the orig tarball however. Right? Hmmm... I'm unsure about that, since the copyright status of the dumps is somehow unclear (and their license too). I'm afraid the FTPmasters would not appreciate that much. I leave it up to you to dedice however... (...) Great. I'm waiting for your answer on my first comment, and I'll upload then. I would prefer not to have a fetch-orig target that would mangle the orig tarball. So the best option, IMHO, would be to solve that upstream. I can do that. The big dump file has been helpful understanding the protocol, so I'm a bit reluctant to just drop it. I can see two options: - Delete the http_dump file entirely. - Delete the part of the file that contains the uploadImage() command, so it goes down to a decent size, less than 10kB. I think option 2 is better, but you also mentioned its license is unclear: Is that because it contains a dump of a windows eyefi session? Would that be better to have a similar dump of the free version of the server? I mean a truncated dump. Your are not talking about the embedded image in tarball in the uploadimage() in the dump file, are you? If I go for a truncated dump, I plan to put back the dumps in the documentation, that would be ok, wouln't it? Thank you very much for your time! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]
On 22:10 Wed 10 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-10, 21:55:
suckless-tools (38-2) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/control:
+ Added myself as maintainer. (Closes: #647090)
+ Vcs-* fields now points to repository on collab-maint
* debian/copyright:
+ Converted to copyright-format 1.0. (Closes: #685611)
Converted to... doesn't usually play well with the freeze policy.
But in this case the required changes are small enough that
hopefully the Release Team won't mind.
Just changed the wordings a bit. I hope the same :)
I noticed another flaw of the current copyright file: the license
for st/* is wrong. Please fix this, too.
Fixed! While fixing that I noticed stterm is also putting wrong
license for st (st is actually duplicated in 2 packages but will be
removed from suckless-tools from 39)
Along with closing the bug I added myself as maintainer
That should be okay.
but I didn't change standards version.
Very well.
Additionally I gave new repository name as
suckless-tools-wheezy.git I've not created it yet on collab just
would like to know if name is okay or you can suggest me better
name ;)
I'm not a git expert, but isn't it usual to keep multiple branches
in a single repository?
I placed source here and mentors package is updated too!
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/suckless-tools-38.git;a=summary
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net}
IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net}
GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4 C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-11, 22:34: suckless-tools (38-2) unstable; urgency=low * debian/control: + Added myself as maintainer. (Closes: #647090) + Vcs-* fields now points to repository on collab-maint * debian/copyright: + Converted to copyright-format 1.0. (Closes: #685611) Converted to... doesn't usually play well with the freeze policy. But in this case the required changes are small enough that hopefully the Release Team won't mind. Just changed the wordings a bit. I hope the same :) license headers - what's that? I noticed another flaw of the current copyright file: the license for st/* is wrong. Please fix this, too. Fixed! You fixed the license short name (well, almost; it should be: BSD-3-clause), but the actual license text (which is more important) is still incorrect. While fixing that I noticed stterm is also putting wrong license for st sterm, on the other hand, has the licence text copied verbatim, but only the short license name wrong. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121011185336.ga...@jwilk.net
Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]
* Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com, 2012-10-11, 09:17: Additionally I gave new repository name as suckless-tools-wheezy.git I've not created it yet on collab just would like to know if name is okay or you can suggest me better name ;) I'm not a git expert, but isn't it usual to keep multiple branches in a single repository? We can keep if we had the previous history in Git but in my case the suckless-tools is a fresh repository from 39-1 and previous maintainer had his own repository in his own domain. So its kinda messy situation that I can't hold this package history in existing suckless-tools.git. Or better I host it some where else than collab like github or gitorious with same name as suckless-tools.git what do you think? New repository for the squeeze branch feels wrong to me, but I'm not really qualified to give you any advice. Maybe other -mentors@ readers could chime in? -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121011185854.ga...@jwilk.net
xlife
Dear mentors, please help. I'm trying to reburn xlife package - http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xlife.html. I've made new version of xlife, got approval from its last developer - http://www.catb.org/esr/software.html, update LifeWiki page - http://www.conwaylife.com/wiki/Xlife, registered XLife projects at http://freecode.com/projects/xlife. What do I have to do next? Should I update old Debian package or create new? The codes of new version of xlife and old (5.0) became very different. So diff-patch will contain almost all new version lines. Please say me what tools should be used for the each next step. Yours sincerely, Vladimir Lidovski, Vol.Litwr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1350010509.961149.3196.32...@saddam2.rambler.ru
Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
license headers - what's that?
Err..
I noticed another flaw of the current copyright file: the license for
st/* is wrong. Please fix this, too.
Fixed!
You fixed the license short name (well, almost; it should be:
BSD-3-clause), but the actual license text (which is more important) is
still incorrect.
Err
While fixing that I noticed stterm is also putting wrong license for st
sterm, on the other hand, has the licence text copied verbatim, but only the
short license name wrong.
yes :)
So much for doing the work when I was sleepy :(. I will fix it tonight
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAK+NOPXd_AW4jPtqwhjB_DEPOvZ8HDj+BzdY_6Gx9GcHma=m...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
New repository for the squeeze branch feels wrong to me, but I'm not really
qualified to give you any advice. Maybe other -mentors@ readers could chime
in?
Well it is actually wrong but I can't see other altenative but I think
I will try it on -mentors and see if others have any good idea.
One thing I can think is just remove existing suckless-tools
repository (I any how have my local copy) then rename
suckless-tools-38 to suckless-tools and on top of this import my 39
work so 38 history and 39 both can leave together. Let me see
Best Regards
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAK+NOPUG6X4R9=A18=3wn-hz8iygo8h0brs_gftn9-n6xdu...@mail.gmail.com
Processed: jampal: block ITP 690274 by RFS 686513
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 690274 by 686513 Bug #690274 [wnpp] ITP: jampal -- mp3 song library management system and player 690274 was not blocked by any bugs. 690274 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 690274: 686513 stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 690274: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690274 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.135001560829514.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: RFS: jampal/02.01.06+dfsg1-2 [ITP] -- mp3 song library
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 686513 RFS: jampal/02.01.06+dfsg1-2 [ITP] -- mp3 song library Bug #686513 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: jampal/02.01.06+dfsg1-2 -- mp3 song library Changed Bug title to 'RFS: jampal/02.01.06+dfsg1-2 [ITP] -- mp3 song library' from 'RFS: jampal/02.01.06+dfsg1-2 -- mp3 song library' stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 686513: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686513 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.135001561029538.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: RFS: jampal/02.01.06+dfsg1-2 [ITP] -- mp3 song library
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 686513 wishlist Bug #686513 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: jampal/02.01.06+dfsg1-2 [ITP] -- mp3 song library Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 686513: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686513 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.135001561029551.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#689126: marked as done (RFS: sweethome3d-furniture/1.2-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Fri, 12 Oct 2012 05:34:17 + with message-id 20121012053417.ga30...@master.debian.org and subject line RFS: sweethome3d-furniture/1.2-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #689126, regarding RFS: sweethome3d-furniture/1.2-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 689126: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689126 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my packages sweethome3d-furnitures and sweethome3d-furnitures-nonfree * Package name: sweethome3d-furnitures Version : 1.2-1 Upstream Author : Various SweetHome3D contributors * URL : http://www.sweethome3d.com/importModels.jsp * License : CC-BY-3.0 Unported, CC-BY-3.0 USA Section : graphics * Package name: sweethome3d-furnitures-nonfree Version : 1.2-1 Upstream Author : Various SweetHome3D contributors * URL : http://www.sweethome3d.com/importModels.jsp * License : Free Art License 1.3 Section : graphics sweethome3d-furnitures - Interior 2D design application with 3D preview (additional furnitures) sweethome3d-furnitures-nonfree - Interior 2D design application with 3D preview (additional non-free furnitures) To access further information about these packages, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/sweethome3d-furnitures http://mentors.debian.net/package/sweethome3d-furnitures-nonfree Alternatively, one can download the packages with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sweethome3d-furnitures/sweethome3d-furnitures_1.2-1.dsc dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/s/sweethome3d-furnitures-nonfree/sweethome3d-furnitures-nonfree_1.2-1.dsc Regards, Gabriele Giacone ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Age of package in NEW : 3 days. Timestamp at mentors : 2012-10-01 11:24 So the package at mentors cannot be younger than the one in NEW. I'm closing this RFS now because the package is in NEW. Please mark the package at mentors needs sponsor = no or remove it.---End Message---
Bug#689167: marked as done (RFS: sweethome3d-furniture-nonfree/1.2-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Fri, 12 Oct 2012 05:36:00 + with message-id 20121012053600.gb30...@master.debian.org and subject line RFS: sweethome3d-furniture-nonfree/1.2-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #689167, regarding RFS: sweethome3d-furniture-nonfree/1.2-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 689167: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689167 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my packages sweethome3d-furnitures and sweethome3d-furnitures-nonfree * Package name: sweethome3d-furnitures Version : 1.2-1 Upstream Author : Various SweetHome3D contributors * URL : http://www.sweethome3d.com/importModels.jsp * License : CC-BY-3.0 Unported, CC-BY-3.0 USA Section : graphics * Package name: sweethome3d-furnitures-nonfree Version : 1.2-1 Upstream Author : Various SweetHome3D contributors * URL : http://www.sweethome3d.com/importModels.jsp * License : Free Art License 1.3 Section : graphics sweethome3d-furnitures - Interior 2D design application with 3D preview (additional furnitures) sweethome3d-furnitures-nonfree - Interior 2D design application with 3D preview (additional non-free furnitures) To access further information about these packages, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/sweethome3d-furnitures http://mentors.debian.net/package/sweethome3d-furnitures-nonfree Alternatively, one can download the packages with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sweethome3d-furnitures/sweethome3d-furnitures_1.2-1.dsc dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/s/sweethome3d-furnitures-nonfree/sweethome3d-furnitures-nonfree_1.2-1.dsc Regards, Gabriele Giacone ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Age of package in NEW : 3 days. Timestamp at mentors : 2012-10-01 11:23 So the package at mentors cannot be younger than the one in NEW. I'm closing this RFS now because the package is in NEW. Please mark the package at mentors needs sponsor = no or remove it. ---End Message---
