Bug#691711: marked as done (RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.23-1)
Your message dated Wed, 31 Oct 2012 07:56:53 +0100 with message-id 20121031065653.ga26...@x230-buxy.home.ouaza.com and subject line Re: [Pkg-sql-ledger-discussion] New LedgerSMB Debian package, v1.3.23-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #691711, regarding RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.23-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 691711: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691711 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package ledgersmb * Package name: ledgersmb Version : 1.3.23-1 Upstream Author : LedgerSMB Core Team * URL : http://www.ledgersmb.org * License : GPL, GPL-2+ Section : web It builds those binary packages: ledgersmb - financial accounting and ERP program To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/ledgersmb Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/ledgersmb/ledgersmb_1.3.23-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: ledgersmb (1.3.23-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. * Updated Standards-Version to 3.9.4 in debian/control, no changes needed. Regards, Robert James Clay j...@rocasa.us ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Robert James Clay wrote: Do you want to upload it to unstable or to experimental ? To unstable. Done. If to unstable, then you should probably close your current unblock request as this version is even more unlikely to be unblocked. Indeed, and you're quite right; I'll be closing it tonight. Thanks. -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Get the Debian Administrator's Handbook: → http://debian-handbook.info/get/---End Message---
Re: (Non-)Usefulness of the current for-wheezy and fit-for-wheezy usertags
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Thibaut Paumard wrote: First of all, you are free to view the bug page with the ordering you prefer. Try using ordering=standard: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=sponsorship-requests;ordering=standard Thanks for the hint. Reverting to standard view is, for me, a huge improvement. Suddenly the two packages I may care about are at the top: roundup and imagemagick with targeted fixes for this release, and that's exactly what I want. The goal of the for-wheezy and not-for-wheezy usertags is to get the maintainer to explicitly state her intent. As a sponsor, I don't care about the sponsoree's intent. If something looks worthwhile, I will help the sponsoree get it to a point where it is ready, and that will happen as a discussion in the bug log. The goal of the (not-)fit-for-wheezy usertags is mainly to allow for reviews by people who will not sponsor the package themselves (which experienced DMs and some DDs sometimes do). I don't think we need anyone to do this. The release criteria are set in stone. Either the package satisfies those criteria, or it doesn't, and the person potentially sponsoring it will notice this, and if it isn't up to par, will communicate with the sponsoree to get it fixed up. At that time, there was only positive feedback. You are indeed the first person to express reservations. I suppose I was not sufficiently engaged with -mentors at that point and entirely missed this discussion; being busy with real life anyway. On the other hand there is some overhead inherent to changing how things work: if you want to introduce the usertags itp, rc, qa, and nmu, it will take some time before people actually use them. I would tend to defer that until after the release, when we will retire (not-)(fit-)for-wheezy any way. That seems reasonable. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=mp1q6zq3zovismwadukr3zmqjxhvdt-byxpnzsqmnu...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#691907: RFS: ovito/1.1.0-1
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Tags: not-for-wheezy
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for a new version of ovito
* Package name: ovito
Version : 1.1.0-1
Upstream Author : Alexander Stukowski stukow...@mm.tu-darmstadt.de
* URL : http://www.ovito.org/
* License : GPL2+
Section : science
It builds those binary packages:
ovito - visualization and analysis tool for atomistic simulation data
ovito-doc - documentation for ovito
ovito-examples - tutorial examples for ovito
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/ovito
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/ovito/ovito_1.1.0-1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
* Maintainer resurrected (Closes: #674283).
* New upstream release.
* Bump to Standards-Version to 3.9.4. No changes required.
* Updated debian/copyright file to include libtachyon license.
* Added --with python2 to debian/rules.
* Removed the explicit python dependence from debian/control,
${python:Depends} is enough with '--with python2'
* Touched debian/patches to reflect the changes in upstream.
* Removed obsolete lintian overrides.
* ovito.lintian-overrides: override hardening warning;
assumed to be a false-positive.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/cag-kx9siz4yvsgssa--4n4m2rq+d4-9l9uibg92d3mfz_+7...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#686070: libpam-ssh/1.92-15
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 package sponsorship-requests user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org usertags 686070 for-wheezy thanks Le 30/10/2012 21:21, Michael Gilbert a écrit : control: retitle -1 RFS: libpam-ssh/1.92-15 [ITP] [REINTRODUCTION] Unfortunately this package was removed from unstable, so it won't be considered for upload until after wheezy unfreezes. Removing RC since as a NEW package the RC categorization does not apply. Best wishes, Mike Hi, Mike, I don't agree: this package *is* a valid candidate for an unblock, as is every package already in Squeeze. Jerome, seeking pre-approval from the release team would help your case. Since Jerome explicitly said he was targeting wheezy, I'm setting the corresponding usertag. Regards, Thibaut. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQkSOXAAoJEJOUU0jg3ChAp6YQAKcc5IvNISt4NHr6661QNZ31 YVsRwxo1QvJeaHqnzjfjamFL/GhWybHMwGbxDYkVzr9HF4Z9XqDkEHRXV2M/I9zx 1kqxpToz8PJz4yk8V3QtHUOgWUnu5W0wZPKYdZOvBpFaO5474tBWCmhhhrgga0G/ PArnu8shH1OjOJsO5gt3PO6pqVPyP0OtCT+jnOfwkZhgf3vIeZ5iXQNZrdwUsCPH vkAlLb99tqb+pOS1shbs5D7EoZ7mJzlgqoNGVgQV+5B2go9wAvBSN/D3aghyse8H wdPVuKGDqg8VesFC3cnmHYahFwJ2QmHGqSx1alPsCQdUVHXcGMHkzyaFg+WXm/vX cMP0JGQ7IUeeUe1gYrFzw66sSjvbXWyNdKvViciJwWSAzSl2cJOBb0RRlq7xcNE3 Kn6s2RQzbdUt10/cOBXgzK/Z57IKS5Xs3UIqz89raMBlcZ5jTXg0AHcvumHK9k+3 B98z6ln1eBao4bISqE6f1/+EH3tL0QAVk51Vcqqjrsdai4EKJWp6Ro+nrfxWw+zg W3vYp59KnSNDMM8irf9tZIkCDmhAlRY2wVLya8AaG1Xf+0E0L9UGcrFwhlr3aIEz I7RxtzpJoNvthFge992yQcmW773/3ixFVCfY8BYScpK8oi7hbtcUEOGHHJOXBTsX RhPXXu/rhVZ/0kCwvhV5 =x0ZV -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/509123a0.6040...@debian.org
Bug#686070: libpam-ssh/1.92-15
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 package sponsorship-requests user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org usertags 686070 - not-fit-for-wheezy thanks I'm removing the not-fit-for-wheezy tag since Thomas claims to have improved on that matter. I don't have time to check the package right now. Regards, Thibaut. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQkSlUAAoJEJOUU0jg3ChAjuIP/jT956v97Pie/byOMly/r2q+ YhvnLzi7jwUmRTT8eC2ZWzhoNVqQia2eAmfJsx3zbnhQ4WKqq5TPwctOWkEtqBl1 D0HZxFIO3rQkxr1QktoSVfSOTnUm4SG0sPy4gG69vBfRFO74FR4b/oV6ISMVlA+D EgijLmbuJIjyLsQNBlwEcWfx/55AkUCGDT6ql1PPfzzGBctJTn+CgybPGEHrw91Q VizFUIRVyOq+pAhTGMxh4bRyzat55KXyAwjg2Ucbq/xcLKF1BKys31ZEErm4D0LA wZ1PgZbsg/REaqWMvRsB+2TA8upUFp1GIDVxNsy623cGEy60bMZPRnsn4++Wm3ov gqlG/PqWDSc+9GgltjTq/kE7xvNWh9UKagNvpNWx3R/0Zg5beVnKvUXJKzmsACwE EjQM2N2BSra4sf07OQ5UIGDphdxOl+1PCyCV6vpy4ZLgGRPvUMSvOLht3ZZBRrAH BkIR2LcHevVB25WMRWwZWULO095hKQF8lXxzUTJW6yRsWELPNYcjYN9/jx0Irl0+ ei7kkQM2ulz0ADEJjO2QGdQuwfPbzRjufWM3Mh/q5pnvY2q2j789xGIHo+fPtRjR 23Z0QnjKwAJ6N+/IqcOlfbzbY8ePxcwS+v0hR3Llmp6tpzxj59pfe/eW4iLGyAq5 H1gZR4SCVLQ1hsf7V160 =zbuq -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50912954.1070...@debian.org
Bug#691780: RFS: imagemagick/8:6.7.7.10-5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 package sponsorship-requests user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org usertags 691780 for-wheezy thanks Bastien says before end of the freeze, so I guess this is for-wheezy. Regards, Thibaut. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQkTC0AAoJEJOUU0jg3ChAI4oP+gMT7lgSe5ZoPkpBXc91fMOP 4ZWTKqRfkOrwRXbdEVD6EX2FGH7hBPng8JgGiV/tML8DW5ATfajh8dp4Tbhr5Gcd aOH6Vg68hEFjjBPj/pTAJeZO5GBOEmG9qNTN+A+1zI7OtCFW0oHkAqe2OHK+4qY2 LiEzQf8qa0ooYWnZiMv03HyaMcwrzlmtTYiNJddlSFIoLNKd/AuzHWcieD4xDIJZ XY7DuswAkYOxmTkIvJj6xGtjS3zgZjen09/HhBFqVWKF39SozMDXXEDlRU9v+0pW gSDyWXFC+rmG+nEs1kXupCrqTqIt9Ji8JxlDq+bQHVFdEUE9XyvKFMttizBO9gwu e6qC6qs6zsuvgY5NLigSknjiP/l1gWiqLo7CYJFSOFqxx7yqwWBjLA5xwXOtL3R5 VD/YN3lz8ExTKvtTOWoOEKlhmFa4JhOldodHy83wVf7RJ+FM1tktHKkxsGKGB5jf jbIirXD8B/r23c9SYlJOD67EvGhTt+GBi8iL2o+jI5jqnGFwMaCeAio+BxnlckGo Z+Kn8jl4h7Sx1XptqGj02L20WMjI2aDHE/BApOjqhjP1vIubI0VcTlZa5ZFZM8Gu iDCEso1VH4whFFMaA/uxdUo65lDEyTCtRtdntpOc6TfquFKeVRleaTl/IjQphA5M 6ug/33GN7H3uHgzfN8MW =beCX -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/509130b5.4060...@debian.org
Processed: ovito: block ITA 674283 by RFS 691907
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 674283 by 691907 Bug #674283 [wnpp] ITA: ovito -- visualization and analysis tool for atomistic simulation data 674283 was not blocked by any bugs. 674283 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 674283: 691907 stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 674283: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674283 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.135170043013361.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: RFS: ovito/1.1.0-1 [ITA]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 691907 RFS: ovito/1.1.0-1 [ITA] Bug #691907 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ovito/1.1.0-1 Changed Bug title to 'RFS: ovito/1.1.0-1 [ITA]' from 'RFS: ovito/1.1.0-1' stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 691907: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691907 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.135170575519241.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#686070: libpam-ssh/1.92-15
Hello, On 31/10/12 14:12, Thibaut Paumard wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 package sponsorship-requests user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org usertags 686070 for-wheezy thanks Le 30/10/2012 21:21, Michael Gilbert a écrit : control: retitle -1 RFS: libpam-ssh/1.92-15 [ITP] [REINTRODUCTION] Unfortunately this package was removed from unstable, so it won't be considered for upload until after wheezy unfreezes. Removing RC since as a NEW package the RC categorization does not apply. Best wishes, Mike Hi, Mike, I don't agree: this package *is* a valid candidate for an unblock, as is every package already in Squeeze. Jerome, seeking pre-approval from the release team would help your case. I have just filled a bug report in this sense to release.debian.org : #691988 Since Jerome explicitly said he was targeting wheezy, I'm setting the corresponding usertag. Regards, Thibaut. Best wishes, Jerome -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQkSOXAAoJEJOUU0jg3ChAp6YQAKcc5IvNISt4NHr6661QNZ31 YVsRwxo1QvJeaHqnzjfjamFL/GhWybHMwGbxDYkVzr9HF4Z9XqDkEHRXV2M/I9zx 1kqxpToz8PJz4yk8V3QtHUOgWUnu5W0wZPKYdZOvBpFaO5474tBWCmhhhrgga0G/ PArnu8shH1OjOJsO5gt3PO6pqVPyP0OtCT+jnOfwkZhgf3vIeZ5iXQNZrdwUsCPH vkAlLb99tqb+pOS1shbs5D7EoZ7mJzlgqoNGVgQV+5B2go9wAvBSN/D3aghyse8H wdPVuKGDqg8VesFC3cnmHYahFwJ2QmHGqSx1alPsCQdUVHXcGMHkzyaFg+WXm/vX cMP0JGQ7IUeeUe1gYrFzw66sSjvbXWyNdKvViciJwWSAzSl2cJOBb0RRlq7xcNE3 Kn6s2RQzbdUt10/cOBXgzK/Z57IKS5Xs3UIqz89raMBlcZ5jTXg0AHcvumHK9k+3 B98z6ln1eBao4bISqE6f1/+EH3tL0QAVk51Vcqqjrsdai4EKJWp6Ro+nrfxWw+zg W3vYp59KnSNDMM8irf9tZIkCDmhAlRY2wVLya8AaG1Xf+0E0L9UGcrFwhlr3aIEz I7RxtzpJoNvthFge992yQcmW773/3ixFVCfY8BYScpK8oi7hbtcUEOGHHJOXBTsX RhPXXu/rhVZ/0kCwvhV5 =x0ZV -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Jerome BENOIT jgmbenoit-at+rezozer*dot_net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5091b0e4.6070...@rezozer.net
Bug#691992: RFS: tmfs/3-1 [ITP] -- Time Machine File System
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package tmfs. * Package name: tmfs Version : 3-1 Upstream Author : Alexandre Bique bique.alexan...@gmail.com * URL : https://github.com/abique/tmfs * License : MIT Section : otherosfs It builds those binary packages: tmfs - Time Machine File System To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/tmfs Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tmfs/tmfs_3-1.dsc More information about tmfs can be obtained from https://github.com/abique/tmfs Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: #689630) Regards, Nicholas Robinson-wall -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121031235334.0121f28...@alfred.nickrw.net
Processed: tmfs: block ITP 689630 by RFS 691992
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 689630 by 691992 Bug #689630 [wnpp] ITP: tmfs -- Apple's Time machine fuse read only file system 689630 was not blocked by any bugs. 689630 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 689630: 691992 stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 689630: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689630 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.135174363724766.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#686417: marked as done (RFS: feedgnuplot/1.23-2 [ITP])
Your message dated Thu, 01 Nov 2012 04:20:35 +
with message-id e1ttmgh-0005cs...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: feedgnuplot/1.23-2 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #686417,
regarding RFS: feedgnuplot/1.23-2 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
686417: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686417
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hi all.
I am looking for a sponsor for my package feedgnuplot. This is a
general-purpose tool to construct plots from standard input. It can be used to
plot both realtime and stored data. A trivial example:
$ seq 5 | feedgnuplot
will plot a line. Fancy things are possible. For instance, to make a real-time
plot to measure data incoming on wlan0:
$ while true; do sleep 1; cat /proc/net/dev; done |
gawk '/wlan0/ {if(b) {print $2-b; fflush()} b=$2}' |
feedgnuplot --lines --stream --xlen 10 --ylabel 'Bytes/sec' --xlabel seconds
or to make a histogram of the distribution of the sizes of files in /tmp:
$ ls -l /tmp | awk '{print $5}' |
feedgnuplot --histogram 0 --bin 100 --curvestyle 0 'with boxes'
I've been using the tool and its package for over a year, and it's now
reasonably stable and well-tested.
License: GPL or Artistic
Upstream homepage: https://github.com/dkogan/feedgnuplot
The ITP bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686413
The mentors page: http://mentors.debian.net/package/feedgnuplot
To get with dget:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/feedgnuplot/feedgnuplot_1.20.dsc
Thanks!
dima
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Package feedgnuplot version 1.23-2 is in NEW now,
and the package at mentors is not newer (2012-10-30) than the package in NEW
(2012-10-30),
so there is currently no package to sponsor.
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/feedgnuplot_1.23-2.html
http://mentors.debian.net/package/feedgnuplot
Please remove the package from mentors or mark it needs sponsor = no.
If for some reason you need to replace the package in NEW,
then you can upload an updated package to mentors
and feel free to reopen this RFS 686417 or open a new RFS.---End Message---
