Bug#675532: RFS: bilibop/0.1 (ITP #675467)
Hi, On 04/07/2013 08:49, intrigeri wrote: Hi, I plan to review, and hopefully upload bilibop next week. Nice to hear :) The last bilibop version is 0.4.13 [1]. The git repository [2] is ahead of 2 commits (fix minor errors). Thank you quidame [1]: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bilibop/bilibop_0.4.13.dsc [2]: http://un.poivron.org/~quidame/git/bilibop.git signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: PHP libraries in /usr/share/
Tomasz Muras nexor1...@gmail.com writes: It looks like a common place to put PHP libraries is under /usr/share. However, our wiki page [1] says: /usr/share/ : Architecture-independent (shared) data I think the data bit there is misleading, are you OK to remove it? For the PHP packages, it's really a source code that we put there. That's the wording from the FHS, so rather than removing it, I think it would be better to add a clarification of what the FHS means by data (which is basically anything that isn't a user-executable program or configuration file and includes such things as architecture-independent libraries). -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87r4fe5gnn@windlord.stanford.edu
Bug#714947: RFS: djvusmooth/0.2.14-1 -- graphical editor for DjVu
Hi Daniel, I found only few pedantic issues... :) `cme check dpkg-control` report the following unnecessary versioned dependencies: * python-all (= 2.6.6-3~) Debian has squeeze - 2.6.6-3+squeeze7; wheezy - 2.7.3-4; jessie - 2.7.5-2; sid - 2.7.5-2; * djvulibre-bin (= 3.5.20-5~) Debian has squeeze - 3.5.23-3; wheezy - 3.5.25.3-1; jessie - 3.5.25.3-3; sid - 3.5.25.4-1; * python-djvu (= 0.1.15) Debian has squeeze - 0.1.18-2; wheezy - 0.3.9-1; jessie - 0.3.9-1; sid - 0.3.9-1; sid - 0.3.9-1+b1; This time let's remove them before upload please. On Fri, 5 Jul 2013 01:08:20 Daniel Stender wrote: * Bumped Debhelper level to 8 (deb/control and compat). Why only to level 8? Current recommended level is 9 and even if you're backporting to squeeze-backports debhelper 9 is there. Any particular reason to stay on compat=8? I know Arch:all packages benefit little from upgrade from dh-8 to dh-9 but personally I would upgrade for the sake of staying up-to-date. IMHO there are less caveats if you maintain all/most of your packages in same DH compatibility level... Another improvement idea might be to use upstream .desktop file from extra/. There are few differences from .desktop file in debian/ and perhaps they could be merged with patch. Usually it is better to use upstream files when possible as it help to track changes and share our improvements as well as reduce duplication. Please advise if you want to address any of the above issues before upload. Thanks. Cheers, Dmitry Smirnov GPG key : 4096R/53968D1B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201307050806.30878.only...@member.fsf.org
