Bug#675532: RFS: bilibop/0.1 (ITP #675467)
Hi,
On 10/09/2013 12:40, intrigeri wrote:
Thanks for all the fixes. I've just reviewed and built 0.4.15 and
hoped to upload right away, but Lintian is still not happy:
W: bilibop-rules: extended-description-contains-empty-paragraph
N:
N:The extended description (the lines after the first line of the
N:Description: field) contains an empty paragraph.
N:
N:Severity: normal, Certainty: certain
N:
N:Check: description, Type: binary, udeb
N:
W: bilibop: extended-description-contains-empty-paragraph
W: bilibop-lockfs: extended-description-contains-empty-paragraph
W: bilibop-common: extended-description-contains-empty-paragraph
W: bilibop-udev: extended-description-contains-empty-paragraph
Looks like some buggy variable substitution.
Oops, you're right.
It is due to a trailing ${Newline} in the Description variable.
It was added to work around a bug [1] affecting dpkg-dev; but this bug
having been fixed recently... the workaround becomes a bug :)
So, fixed:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bilibop/bilibop_0.4.16.dsc
Cheers,
quidame
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659814
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#723570: RFS: skippy-xd/0.5.1-1 ITP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package skippy-xd * Package name: skippy-xd Version : 0.5.1-1 Upstream Author : Hyriand hyri...@thegraveyard.org * URL : http://code.google.com/p/skippy-xd/ * License : GPL-2+ Section : x11 It builds those binary packages: skippy-xd - Full screen Expose style standalone task switcher for X11. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/skippy-xd Alternatively, one can download the package with wget using this command: wget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/skippy-xd/skippy-xd_0.5.1-1.dsc Regards, Martin Brambilla -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSOGQIAAoJEBS0Wq9QZp6O29oH/A5mMG2lR+MhOHzGhzG9zhEq VN1nQoXfAyXO3zvFXW+ADJnBOw1r39X+Iw4MHBQXMihgVMEkymRUO6gPvcb5E4Pc PFJVRCUvwr/HrCzsm7VDSkYpNxhKlDBmPA0IcD5Rb30j0QlT4D/YW5R53owll1eJ YOf1BHCUpnrLQ9UqBJPlW4lpm/mSyl62FYK5Wedz7TpphGXz4Vo7iXzz6hQA4NkV k1gA+ckB96zCP85Yo72PQSXIhzcNScX/ptPU9h3MCX3k6JXDn2ldVSRNu6nIgPp8 go3n39Hk1S48m4UKlHi0G7h9VMwDrvIsTqowXLV4uXABn2NQs49byiPcg+PuQ+I= =VcUr -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52386408.8030...@gmail.com
Bug#721080: RFS: vpcs/0.4b2-1 [ITP]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 retitle 721080 RFS: vpcs/0.4b2-2 [ITP] thanks Dear mentors, I have updated my package and would still like to find a sponsor for my package vpcs * Package name: vpcs Version : 0.4b2-2 Upstream Author : Paul Meng mirn...@gmail.com * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/vpcs/ * License : BSD Section : net It builds those binary packages: vpcs - Virtual PC Simulator To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/vpcs Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vpcs/vpcs_0.4b2-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: vpcs (0.4b2-2) unstable; urgency=low * Update debian/copyright to BSD-2-Clause * Create debian/watch file -- Daniel Lintott dan...@serverb.co.uk Tue, 17 Sep 2013 13:39:01 +0100 Regards, Daniel Lintott -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSOGqAAAoJEMw/9yOWzAkJ2XUH/2BzJTUyf9NYD3PXRd2+Gb22 Herzvru+0RZGyEltITIO/Q/wtePylWyHoPUiH7KyHtKaPihzTWeIyCI0LNzmTTNc rV6T0phSVk0oc53O20w3m59BllMd6rJOV0Twuw3ibvgh/+EMAHIss0zd3fetIiMZ gdrYKpuuxQDiF9dX80IEpCHEKfX7Uc849Ewto2P7l5qetyzcLE0EOcEzNs0+1J4c 02TRLTL0QN6A4nNyuWrEXUd3hsj+kTNEtFpX8Ib6KAAy9zkRS4Xmc/x0BlC0ne4e 7MEvQuy+smZV/PD4J5AnMGTz3EyPIayxMlW48eTTZ2wTHjUudeZywKrPpTkPaE8= =LUFL -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52386a80.3060...@serverb.co.uk
Upload modified package to mentors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi mentors, I updated one of my packages on mentors earlier and wanted to clarify whether each upload increment the build number? (For example 0.4b2-1 would become 0.4b2-2) At the the moment, my second upload of the package has created a strange error: Buildsystem: Package uses debhelper with an old compatibility level No compatibility level set! I have checked the upload and compat is definitely present in both the debian folder and debian.tar.gz The package in question is vpcs: https://mentors.debian.net/package/vpcs Regards Daniel Lintott -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSOG4kAAoJEMw/9yOWzAkJ9psIAId2K7pruLt6/9W+bTvKBpR5 x8e3hWsyALWlnOLOlcZ2nPiXIH9b2jvIVbXqAYKwpMFMUQanCD169PMg0LFCLYzo YvF4Mm98IECUiGPwJQ+ErW4GkpYPMtYlw+ziK+ywEmv7YmbopoHsd5x4qYzyvmp9 o3UR7d6ie3UhGB/A9CVgfn0iCSIxzMtpnbq+oAsc/hbryMtoBNRiqOZJSNq0lL1M y4ZjkpTAe+nCd90PDM+g4yz1zzrIBXmuLxyWmPAsjRsD+Wif40XKJsAvJeiS8klQ aqwPBpcPsEocBzR0kxlgtbyTESQJlNuXzrmkE3aXYe/scn5RQhXKkgKKjxNBz4c= =agek -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52386e24.4010...@serverb.co.uk
Re: Upload modified package to mentors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, I updated one of my packages on mentors earlier and wanted to clarify whether each upload increment the build number? (For example 0.4b2-1 would become 0.4b2-2) Yes, each upload should increase the Debian revision, and contain a changelog that hustifies the new revision. There are exceptions where the Debian revision is changed with some other pattern, e.g. non-maintainer uploads. However, the first upload of an upstream version to the Debian archive should reset the Debian revision to 1. At the the moment, my second upload of the package has created a strange error: Buildsystem: Package uses debhelper with an old compatibility level No compatibility level set! I have checked the upload and compat is definitely present in both the debian folder and debian.tar.gz The package in question is vpcs: https://mentors.debian.net/package/vpcs I think the current compatibility level is 8, not 9. - -nik - -- # apt-assassinate --help Usage: apt-assassinate [upstream|maintainer] package PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) iQJOBAEBCAA4BQJSOHNYMRpodHRwczovL3d3dy5kb21pbmlrLWdlb3JnZS5kZS9n cGctcG9saWN5LnR4dC5hc2MACgkQt5o8FqDE8pY0pw/9FMZel5vDumGNW0LCxb1I ymhWGYUYsJBCfLr1BT/o3r9OP2T5O3ED+dnGsZghWFoxo4gi+KzazMlKmA0gJ1FE 3KuhSNu7+o16V7YAoB+jJ7KMuLW/KQQyYGb4q2pF+OgjRzYorkr/4cmvvB1Ehn8B dSyGmfGIPd1rUvhDmia+ITzEhrqvx0AUul3l5vT58IebfaZcKjMvvhppT+dQh2Ch Adf6wfhQAbHYRQBoN7OyBSXImK5BiYq8MgVUyYnjOhE1L2sbYUTdsyQ/GJYoM+bd erkThhtakY2p+sZFen3kcIII5Ll4UJSx6k83N2LrJz5y2PY5fbtyO8dPhcMomylv pwvAkCr5HMfznL+PTzFO20RbeVt1JLw0DYIAl5JtNGYY3V+ogP0uZr7Rjt6J4bxZ 6ARyp0Ltcvz+b8G9ncMagolZVw4RMxRts5ivRc0Xvhpsg1Rgpjz9d/1+tAugtsdY afguebfZoM4XgQhtvwv8em68DngahIZtQj28k47cPWVwd3ks7+mCGtRXqCGvKRtI GX8nMuSMdn+IAnN/FvQYSxa+wRQAzQUufUUQpJS968lJV9tRwES5AddDsSVFGe2R g31aBe3dShNFC2Ro7SHKn/DCLNI0Wq1IijugRbU08YNfP2tv41CP96WnAE/L7lAd 1oBzUHGMazhnPEGJA8MlCZg= =AxGZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130917152056.gl6...@keks.naturalnet.de
Re: Upload modified package to mentors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I think the current compatibility level is 8, not 9. Forget it. - -nik - -- Natureshadow Auf welchem Server liegt das denn jetzt…? mirabilos Wenn es nicht übers Netz kommt bei Hetzner, wenn es nicht gelesen wird bei STRATO, wenn es klappt bei manitu. PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) iQJOBAEBCAA4BQJSOHQQMRpodHRwczovL3d3dy5kb21pbmlrLWdlb3JnZS5kZS9n cGctcG9saWN5LnR4dC5hc2MACgkQt5o8FqDE8pYf0A/+Ng6zWq+IEEununYN9eg7 tDe9ymi3FrWi1Iv1w33N/N9rJ4p6RzT9QvQigPX0pwht1hl7SBEk1d8LsJRwKOS6 hTTg4OZgLm0I7KpHeVfKh301InB53Q5eEQJkzwGlb9zYEdDnASagoS7IWbGT8rLg gYoBLeBuLz8LHPEwstVV1C75izEASoiehW1xh4JWFcGMvq3ew+oE1lNYrSSISJeZ 3/VYt6hrvi2S4Z2CUOsCrukwVsGz43/KtSHc6jQCk7KGDBnIwmsNQ7h30wPdGYoO Okvk8kO8+/8ehjfxr/o4uFKWGJzmfHLGxpNnygk/OYXoS1h4Imvx9nDlf2lvrGQI RzA1YHDLRy0utiiX3kD0UnMAdrFl8mzrW5din0igu/0RGhWdrHES9KtI7S5VxI4p XwJ1WrQ7+LOgSuV2034puT+EG9MyaZOMX/mCP0wnXpHjssI/ZHbAAIUW4xus5jck EP+nkfc6hcHGJ7i3GmrBPJ7pRojV4+UHDEkdi6Et7I2gCUhc8DvZSQAP6AeWEBFo ylLHvj4eKvLqa31ASmy7jacb6myZbYMrX1cce5lLDGliDnVAoYJGnnTlhdrSYaE6 SPXUkjYUtdrUlCjDWt0Oo5OR5DDvrnhbn/PY1r/voc+88mjpLhbhva3LYefMV+dI yL8p0JRjdcLduD9zWP1hdqg= =cDjV -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130917152400.gm6...@keks.naturalnet.de
Bug#723582: RFS: metar/0.2-1 ITP
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package metar * Package name: metar Version : 0.2-1 Upstream Author : Fernando Iazeolla xna...@yahoo.it * URL : http://githib.com/elboza/metar * License : GPL Section : utilities It builds those binary packages: metar - a simple command line metar and taf. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/metar Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/metar/metar_0.2-1.dsc More information about metar can be obtained from http://github.com/elboza/metar. Changes since the last upload: metar (0.2-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release (Closes: #) is the bug number of your ITP -- Fernando Iazeolla xna...@yahoo.it Mon, 09 Sep 2013 22:32:41 +0200 Regards, Fernando Iazeolla -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/047d4b42-5dee-4eec-b177-25a0a3ae9...@yahoo.it
Bug#723584: RFS: dcl/0.1-1 ITP
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package dcl * Package name: dcl Version : 0.1-1 Upstream Author : Fernando Iazeolla xna...@yahoo.it * URL : http://github.com/elboza/dcl * License : GPL Section : utilities It builds those binary packages: dcl - D-cleaner (Disk Directory Cleaner) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/dcl Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dcl/dcl_0.1-1.dsc More information about dcl can be obtained from http://github.com/elboza/dcl. Changes since the last upload: dcl (0.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release (Closes: #) is the bug number of your ITP -- Fernando Iazeolla xna...@yahoo.it Sun, 15 Sep 2013 23:21:52 +0200 Regards, Fernando Iazeolla -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/fb51f6ee-6299-45ed-900b-55c8bdd5e...@yahoo.it
Bug#723583: RFS: avt/0.2-1 ITP
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package avt * Package name: avt Version : 0.2-1 Upstream Author : Fernando Iazeolla xna...@yahoo.it * URL : http://github.com/elboza/avt * License : GPL Section : utilities It builds those binary packages: avt - Aviation Tools. metar and taf command line. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/avt Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/avt/avt_0.2-1.dsc More information about avt can be obtained from http://github.com/elboza/avt. Changes since the last upload: avt (0.2-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release (Closes: #) is the bug number of your ITP -- Fernando Iazeolla xna...@yahoo.it Sun, 15 Sep 2013 22:58:17 +0200 Regards, Fernando Iazeolla -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/f66d5818-8d6c-47f5-8331-924e7162c...@yahoo.it
Bug#717866: marked as done (RFS: mapserver/6.2.1-4)
Your message dated Tue, 17 Sep 2013 20:03:45 +0200 with message-id 52389981.9010...@xs4all.nl and subject line mapserver/6.2.1-4 is superseded by mapserver/6.4.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #717866, regarding RFS: mapserver/6.2.1-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 717866: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717866 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mapserver Package name: mapserver Version : 6.2.1-4 Upstream Author : The MapServer team URL : http://www.mapserver.org/ License : MIT/X11 Section : devel It builds those binary packages: cgi-mapserver - CGI executable for MapServer libmapscript-perl - Perl MapServer module libmapscript-ruby - MapServer library for Ruby libmapscript-ruby1.8 - MapServer library for Ruby 1.8 libmapscript-ruby1.9.1 - MapServer library for Ruby 1.9.1 libmapserver - Transitional dummy package for libmapserver-6.2.1 libmapserver-6.2.1 - Shared library for MapServer libmapserver-6.2.1-dev - Shared library development files for MapServer libmapserver-dev - Transitional dummy package for libmapserver-6.2.1-dev mapserver-bin - MapServer utilities mapserver-doc - documentation for MapServer php5-mapscript - php5-cgi module for MapServer python-mapscript - Python library for MapServer To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/mapserver Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mapserver/mapserver_6.2.1-4.dsc More information about MapServer can be obtained from http://www.mapserver.org/. Changes since the last upload (#717597): * Use pkgkde-gensymbols pkgkde-symbolshelper to handle C++ symbols. * Use upstream version without debian revision when generating symbols. Regards, Sebastiaan Couwenberg ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- MapServer 6.4.0 was released today, and I already prepared the packaging based on the beta2 and rc1 releases in the DebianGIS git repo. The changes for mapserver/6.2.1-4 are included in mapserver/6.4.0-1 which is to be uploaded by my sponsor Francesco Paolo Lovergine soon.---End Message---
Re: Upload modified package to mentors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 17/09/13 18:50, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2013-09-17 16:58 +0200, Daniel Lintott wrote: Sponsors have different requirements, but most of them would rather not want you do that. I shall keep this in mind, for future uploads. True, but there is a different problem: , | dpkg-source: error: File ./vpcs_0.4b2.orig.tar.gz has size 175612 instead of expected 172342 ` The package in question is vpcs: https://mentors.debian.net/package/vpcs Looks like you used different .orig.tar.gz tarballs for 0.4b2-1 and 0.4b2-2. Ah... I had recreated the git repository to follow the git workflow outlined on the Debian Wiki, which in turn has recreated the .orig.tar.gz tarball. What would be the best option from here? Should I remove the package from mentors altogether and upload it again? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSOJ5iAAoJEMw/9yOWzAkJhrgH/1oNvZ2gNSXkaMxn4Ov2goDo YknON4+qe0ASIrYYiGPPAihKFF2bs9FhaOOIYirA+cyqhSx2ubQTAX2cFxHb75Hm KDcdq8BFbst/60IGWGEo+oEXYcnUY9IKHDEFqPGYNXdEo/rj7JvD3mjPEOMp00qT IJtYH+hREju7e8HN7AM+Zf+JJlDCo9Dlf8yQaQkOQ1vBK+qu6ZFQk2y+QuFSs3O2 Ayq1V4N4CtPGb3sQ6D7l5F6Mae9Yc+aysRQ7OCqpT6ay7Mf/P7PVS4+f0fm0d6lZ dSb1U0PeUkCS6qEr+yJIL1ihnRpwgg7H6jtuY8ApNAxClTTOSXyc0VTUvq0TmBQ= =FNaw -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52389e62.6040...@serverb.co.uk
Re: Upload modified package to mentors
On 2013-09-17 16:58 +0200, Daniel Lintott wrote: I updated one of my packages on mentors earlier and wanted to clarify whether each upload increment the build number? (For example 0.4b2-1 would become 0.4b2-2) Sponsors have different requirements, but most of them would rather not want you do that. At the the moment, my second upload of the package has created a strange error: Buildsystem: Package uses debhelper with an old compatibility level No compatibility level set! I have checked the upload and compat is definitely present in both the debian folder and debian.tar.gz True, but there is a different problem: , | dpkg-source: error: File ./vpcs_0.4b2.orig.tar.gz has size 175612 instead of expected 172342 ` The package in question is vpcs: https://mentors.debian.net/package/vpcs Looks like you used different .orig.tar.gz tarballs for 0.4b2-1 and 0.4b2-2. Cheers, Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/877gefjq2d@turtle.gmx.de
Re: Help with bug 722794
On 17-09-13 21:01, Jose G. López wrote: I've received a bug in one of my packages and I want to check with you a proper solution before I make a stupid thing. There is some discussion on debian-devel: [1] and follow ups. It is not agreed that the bug is valid. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/09/msg00297.html Paul signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Upload modified package to mentors
On 2013-09-17 20:24 +0200, Daniel Lintott wrote: On 17/09/13 18:50, Sven Joachim wrote: Looks like you used different .orig.tar.gz tarballs for 0.4b2-1 and 0.4b2-2. Ah... I had recreated the git repository to follow the git workflow outlined on the Debian Wiki, which in turn has recreated the .orig.tar.gz tarball. What would be the best option from here? Should I remove the package from mentors altogether and upload it again? That would be the best, I think. Cheers, Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/871u4njnw4@turtle.gmx.de
Help with bug 722794
Hello, I've received a bug in one of my packages and I want to check with you a proper solution before I make a stupid thing. The bug number is 722794. I've been investigating the problem with linkage and I see it comes from package libmcrypt-dev, more precisly from a script it installs '/usr/bin/libmcrypt-config'. I'm not sure if /usr/lib is a worng place to install libs in a multiarch system but I have amd64 and that library is installed there. The build system do in configure.in: MCRYPT_CFLAGS=`libmcrypt-config --cflags` MCRYPT_LIBS=`libmcrypt-config --libs` And that is translated to: libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/include -Wall -Wpointer-arith -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -c libgrg_tmp.c -fPIE -o libgrg_tmp.o /dev/null 21 /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -fPIE -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -version-info 2:7:0 -fPIE -pie -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -o libgringotts.la -rpath /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu libgrg_crypt.lo libgrg_structs.lo libgrg_utils.lo libgrg_tmp.lo -lz -lbz2 -L/usr/lib -lmcrypt -lmhash -lm libtool: link: gcc -shared -fPIC -DPIC .libs/libgrg_crypt.o .libs/libgrg_structs.o .libs/libgrg_utils.o .libs/libgrg_tmp.o -lz -lbz2 -L/usr/lib /usr/lib/libmcrypt.so -lmhash -lm -O2 -Wl,-z -Wl,relro -Wl,-z -Wl,now -Wl,-soname -Wl,libgringotts.so.2 -o .libs/libgringotts.so.2.0.7 So this line seems to be a problem '-L/usr/lib /usr/lib/libmcrypt.so' So my questions are, is it ok to install by hand (admin) a lib into /usr/lib as YunQiang Su says? Can someone try this on a non official or different port? And sorry if I didn't explain myself ok, this is my first filled bug ;-) Any help would be appreciated. Regards signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Upload modified package to mentors
On 2013-09-17 21:42 +0200, Daniel Lintott wrote: On 17/09/13 19:36, Sven Joachim wrote: That would be the best, I think. Thank you for your assistance Sven. Note that I'm not a DD and cannot sponsor your package. I have now uploaded the package to mentors again, hopefully fixed this time around. Would you kind enough to take another look at the package for me? The Makefiles look rather broken, both with and without your LinuxMakefilePatch: - hardcoding defines for Linux and i386 cannot be right. Either your architecture is i386, then gcc already defines these (as 1), or it is not - then CPUTYPE or OSTYPE really ought to be different. - -m32 and -m64 don't belong in CFLAGS, since gcc -m32 and gcc -m64 are really different compilers (i.e. different versions of cc1 get invoked). Worse, on i386 with an amd64 kernel, 64-bit binaries get produced. Remove this part of the patch and don't set CC at all. - CPPFLAGS are ignored. Cheers, Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87pps7i4ay@turtle.gmx.de
Re: Upload modified package to mentors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 17/09/13 19:36, Sven Joachim wrote: That would be the best, I think. Thank you for your assistance Sven. I have now uploaded the package to mentors again, hopefully fixed this time around. Would you kind enough to take another look at the package for me? Regards Daniel Lintott -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSOLC2AAoJEMw/9yOWzAkJqdcH/2djIH7ZEGxy88kfDEodd6g3 bZ39Q/Mmu2qMskl9pbi+sRd/xN7sthdIcoKwD6TPou4zUpje8HEQunhk8fwxOb4g D4qE7eKTgV7/fiV357XSe8aG0wujB7uMyjlwlWXkm1nnIajTNN9VAjcmtnA5eruW w7QyGC2Q2zpBFITW3f3CK6UHfMRXmBSaGoZr+dMyqRrB8GsxfpTyNKmG1fZUDfaT hR1a1lcvOwDEIJMmpIOlBPSoS79cCA8gZ5xIxy75BOxMQO6crR3THnHfGafn/haL ozbE+Rvm0bP5ZWje8atCdV8KkzFDUnE5Xa2Nl6Dkgnu5ca1wEsH5QQo1qP0nRb4= =sWpu -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5238b0b6.8040...@serverb.co.uk
Bug#721080: RFS: vpcs/0.4b2-1 [ITP]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 retitle 721080 RFS: vpcs/0.4b2-1 [ITP] thanks Dear mentors, Following some advice on Debian Mentors, I have re-uploaded the vpcs package to mentors. * Package name: vpcs Version : 0.4b2-1 Upstream Author : Paul Meng mirn...@gmail.com * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/vpcs/ * License : BSD Section : net It builds those binary packages: vpcs - Virtual PC Simulator To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/vpcs Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vpc/vpcs_0.4b2-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: vpcs (0.4b2-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release (Closes: #720196) -- Daniel Lintott dan...@serverb.co.uk Tue, 17 Sep 2013 19:44:40 +0100 Regards Daniel Lintott -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSOK9ZAAoJEMw/9yOWzAkJ32EH/09OJYIrae8UFBpAB9H6/sPa dXLh/B9r+dFhNrCBJjn+sYN3EEaiGtp6hGgVbVlOwa7L24l0trhpSLIzRrog2S9x NCbkROI7uKkB3EIEJCNdzeofNhrdjeUlGL7yQGewJLPjcwFtfQCUSsI1JQWgHqzS BJ9wiHNF/nQqbNl8XcVng27r2/306ktY3asID+MNqPvrG1ib6qs1yTDZvS9/ayGY za47bTgJVcOzWtAU752VPNOaaj3u1/tSRTNrCkdUdHHF0dbJZqf2MU7m0ipvMyBm DVr9QhIxZvOnSxtNhgqS6d/AbJKgVjZeXKmlPE8J3B9pQo4Av8IRTRqOJuJY9V0= =2T1W -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5238af59.6090...@serverb.co.uk
Bug#675532: marked as done (RFS: bilibop/0.4.16 (ITP #675467))
Your message dated Wed, 18 Sep 2013 00:48:56 +0200 with message-id 85eh8nxdwn@boum.org and subject line Re: Bug#675532: RFS: bilibop/0.1 (ITP #675467) has caused the Debian Bug report #675532, regarding RFS: bilibop/0.4.16 (ITP #675467) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 675532: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675532 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package bilibop * Package name: bilibop Version: 0.1 Upstream Author: bilibop project quid...@poivron.org * URL: https://poivron.org/~quidame/bilibop_project/ * License: GPL-3.0+ Section: admin It builds those binary packages: bilibop - run Debian from external media - metapackage bilibop-common - shell functions for bilibop scripts bilibop-lockfs - lock filesystems and write changes into RAM bilibop-rules - udev rules for OS running from external media To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/bilibop Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bilibop/bilibop_0.1.dsc To know more: The bilibop suite is designed to help admins to maintain a Debian OS installed on a removable and writable media. One of its main goals is to fix security issues or harden standard rules and policies, to make the system more robust in this particular situation. bilibop-common functions use proc, sysfs and udev databases to query informations about block devices. The drivemap command shows them in a tree of dependencies. bilibop-rules fixes bug #645466: using the bilibop-common functions, the udev rules file fixes the external disk hosting the running system, and all its partitions, as members of the 'disk' group instead of 'floppy'; dm-crypt, LVM, loop devices and aufs root filesystems (and any combination of them) are supported. bilibop-lockfs can be used as an alternative to the 'fsprotect' package (especially for OS on USB stick), with additional features: - whitelist based configuration: all is protected but the listed fs/mountpoints - not only filesystems are set readonly, but also block devices - swap device management - notifications are send to the user about filesystems status (about temporary or permanent changes) Thanks for your attention quidame -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'testing-proposed-updates') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-486 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi, quidame wrote (17 Sep 2013 13:03:37 GMT) : So, fixed: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bilibop/bilibop_0.4.16.dsc Uploaded, thanks! Note that I had to run pbuilder with -v0.0, to make sure the ITP bug was closed once the package is accepted into the archive. For your next new package, you'll want to ensure the ITP is closed in the *most recent* debian/changelog entry. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc---End Message---
Bug#723626: RFS: worklog/1.8-7 [ITA]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the package worklog, which was orphaned by ema@debian a while back, and due to some recent interest in the package by people other than myself, I've packaged up some bug fixes and ema@debian says he is too busy to sponsor it, and so I'm hoping someone else can take this on. * Package name: worklog Version : 1.8-7 Upstream Author : trux...@truxton.com * URL : http://www.truxton.com/~trux/software/ * License : Public domain Section : misc It builds those binary packages: worklog- Keep Track of Time worked on Projects To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/worklog Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/worklog/worklog_1.8-7.dsc Changes since the last upload: * New maintainer (Closes: #628157) * Fix extra second added (Closes: #548349) * Fix rounding error (Closes: #548347) * Use negative times correctly (Closes: #571718) Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.00.1309172354221.3...@orange.limedaley.com
