Bug#733258: RFS: kerneltop/0.8-2.2 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable]
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 09:21:14PM +0100, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote: * URL : http://www.xenotime.net/linux/kerneltop/ Found the same URL in a very old LWN article, but currently it holds some electronic cigarette weblog. Sven -- There we were, the three of us, the thief the king and I. Finally, we were forced to see, we were equals in the night. [Streetlight Manifesto - The three of us] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131228123610.gb3...@garkbit.lan
Bug#733258: RFS: kerneltop/0.8-2.2 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable]
Yes I know. This URL was in the original package, I could not find alternative resource. I will try to contact upstream, especially when I have patches to forward. I am quite new to this and I am not sure what should be done in this situation. On Dec 28, 2013 1:42 PM, Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de wrote: On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 09:21:14PM +0100, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote: * URL : http://www.xenotime.net/linux/kerneltop/ Found the same URL in a very old LWN article, but currently it holds some electronic cigarette weblog. Sven -- There we were, the three of us, the thief the king and I. Finally, we were forced to see, we were equals in the night. [Streetlight Manifesto - The three of us]
Bug#726791: willing to sponsor awstats
Hello Sergey, Hello Niels, I'd be willing to look at awstats 7.2~dfsg-1 and upload it if it looks OK to me. Is there a packaging-related reason why Niels did not upload it for you so far? Bye Willi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52beec55.5000...@debian.org
Bug#733324: RFS: reiserfsprogs/1:3.6.24-1
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a new sponsor for my package reiserfsprogs.
My old sponsor didn't answer my mails about adding my DM key to dak so I
could upload my own packages again.
And Robert, my mentor from grub2, doestn't have currently time for Debian.
* Package name: reiserfsprogs
Version : 1:3.6.24-1
Upstream Author : Namesys
* License : GPl 2
Section : admin
It builds those binary packages:
mkreiserfs-udeb - User-level tools for ReiserFS filesystems (udeb)
reiserfsprogs - User-level tools for ReiserFS filesystems
reiserfsprogs-udeb - User-level tools for ReiserFS filesystems (udeb)
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/reiserfsprogs
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/reiserfsprogs/reiserfsprogs_3.6.24-1.dsc
More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com.
Changes since the last upload:
* New upstream version.
* Convert to Source Format 3.0 (quilt).
* Remove DMUA field.
* Add a ${misc:Depends} dependency.
* Drop build dependency on cdbs.
* Use dpkg-buildflags for hardened build flags.
* Update to policy 3.9.5.
* Update watch file.
* Use dh_autotools-dev_updateconfig to update config.guess and
cobfig.sub at build time.
* Update to debhelper compat level 9.
Regards,
Felix Zielcke
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1388245333.29485.10.camel@fz.local
Bug#733325: RFS: libaal/1.0.5-6
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a new sponsor for my package libaal
My old sponsor didn't answer my mails about adding my DM key to dak so
I could upload my own packages again.
And Robert, my mentor from grub2, doestn't have currently time for
Debian.
* Package name: libaal
Version : 1.0.5-6
Upstream Author : Namesys
* License : GPL 2
Section : libs
It builds those binary packages:
libaal-dev - Reiser4's application abstraction library
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/libaal
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/liba/libaal/libaal_1.0.5-6.dsc
More information about hello can be obtained from
http://www.example.com.
Changes since the last upload:
* Convert to source format 3.0 (quilt).
* debian/patches/bitops.c.diff: Make the bit_t change from Luk a
patch
file.
* Remove DMUA field.
* Update to debhelper compat level 9.
* Update to policy 3.9.5.
* Add a ${misc:Depends} to libaal-dev.
* Switch rules file to use dh command.
- Use dh --with autoreconf to update libtool and conig,{sub,guess}
at build time. (Closes: #700357)
* Update watch file.
Regards,
Felix Zielcke
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1388245550.29485.11.camel@fz.local
Bug#733327: RFS: reiser4progs/1.0.8-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a new sponsor for my package reiser4progs My old sponsor didn't answer my mails about adding my DM key to dak so I could upload my own packages again. And Robert, my mentor from grub2, doestn't have currently time for Debian. * Package name: reiser4progs Version : 1.0.8-1 Upstream Author : Namesys * License : GPL 2 Section : admin It builds those binary packages: libreiser4-dev - Reiser4's filesystem access and manipulation library reiser4progs - administration utilities for the Reiser4 filesystem To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/reiser4progs Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/reiser4progs/reiser4progs_1.0.8-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: * New upstream version. * Convert to source format 3.0 (quilt). * Remove DMUA field. * Remove build dependency on libncurses5-dev. Not used. (Closes: #667889) * Update to policy 3.9.5. * Patch 01_gcc_4_4.diff removed. Merged upstream. * Enable hardened build flags. * Update watch file. Regards, Felix Zielcke -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1388245853.29485.13.camel@fz.local
Bug#732667: marked as done (RFS: rt-extension-spawnlinkedticketinqueue/0.06-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2013 16:26:56 + with message-id e1vwwj2-0005rk...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: rt-extension-spawnlinkedticketinqueue/0.06-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #732667, regarding RFS: rt-extension-spawnlinkedticketinqueue/0.06-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 732667: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=732667 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist User: debian-de...@debian.or.jp Usertags: debianjp Control: block 732664 by -1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package rt-extension-spawnlinkedticketinqueue * Package name: rt-extension-spawnlinkedticketinqueue Version : 0.06-1 Upstream Author : Kevin Falcone falc...@bestpractical.com * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/RT-Extension-SpawnLinkedTicketInQueue/ * License : GPL-2 Section : perl It builds those binary packages: rt4-extension-spawnlinkedticketinqueue - quickly spawn linked tickets in different queues (Request Tracker) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/rt-extension-spawnlinkedticketinqueue Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rt-extension-spawnlinkedticketinqueue/rt-extension-spawnlinkedticketinqueue_0.06-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://search.cpan.org/dist/RT-Extension-SpawnLinkedTicketInQueue/ Regards, KURASHIKI Satoru -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-20-pve (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package rt-extension-spawnlinkedticketinqueue version 0.06-1 is in unstable now. http://packages.qa.debian.org/rt-extension-spawnlinkedticketinqueue---End Message---
Bug#726791: willing to sponsor awstats
On 2013-12-28 16:20, Willi Mann wrote: Hello Sergey, Hello Niels, I'd be willing to look at awstats 7.2~dfsg-1 and upload it if it looks OK to me. Hi Willi, Thanks for considering. Is there a packaging-related reason why Niels did not upload it for you so far? Bye Willi Sadly, the truth appears to be that I have forgotten that there was a pending RFS for awstats - Sorry, Sergey. Willi, if you don't mind, please have a look at it and sponsor it. I am afraid I won't have time to take time for in the nearest future and I suspect Sergey has waited quite long enough. ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52bf1467.2020...@thykier.net
Restrictive Artwork License
Dear mentors, (upstream) Freeplane 1.3.x will have new icons (application icon, document icon), but the artist wants to keep all rights and only grant the Freeplane project all rights of use. -- Is that ok for Debian? -- Is it even compatible with the GPL-2+ license of Freeplane? Thanks and Happy New Year, -- Felix Natter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87mwjklt51@bitburger.home.felix
Bug#726791: willing to sponsor awstats
Am 2013-12-28 19:11, schrieb Niels Thykier: On 2013-12-28 16:20, Willi Mann wrote: Hello Sergey, Hello Niels, I'd be willing to look at awstats 7.2~dfsg-1 and upload it if it looks OK to me. Uploaded. The repository at git.debian.org still only has some 7.1.1 version, though. WM -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52bf2770.9050...@debian.org
Bug#726791: marked as done (RFS: awstats/7.2+dfsg-1)
Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2013 20:42:50 +0100 with message-id 52bf29ba.8020...@debian.org and subject line Re: willing to sponsor awstats has caused the Debian Bug report #726791, regarding RFS: awstats/7.2+dfsg-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 726791: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=726791 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package awstats * Package name: awstats Version : 7.2+dfsg-1 * URL : http://awstats.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL-3+ Section : web It builds those binary packages: awstats- powerful and featureful web server log analyzer To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/awstats Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/awstats/awstats_7.2+dfsg-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: new upstream release + few tweaks to automate uscan. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- [Should have gone to bug-done in the first place...] Am 2013-12-28 19:11, schrieb Niels Thykier: On 2013-12-28 16:20, Willi Mann wrote: Hello Sergey, Hello Niels, I'd be willing to look at awstats 7.2~dfsg-1 and upload it if it looks OK to me. Uploaded. The repository at git.debian.org still only has some 7.1.1 version, though. WM---End Message---
Bug#718792: bug 718792 (sponsorship-request on fio) still open?
Hello Martin, Hello Sven, is there a particular reason why this bug on sponsorship-requests is still open? thanks WM -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52bf363c.8040...@debian.org
Bug#733258: RFS: kerneltop/0.8-2.2 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable]
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 03:34:37PM +0100, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote: Yes I know. This URL was in the original package, I could not find alternative resource. I will try to contact upstream, especially when I have patches to forward. I am quite new to this and I am not sure what should be done in this situation. Keeping it in the debian/copyright file for historic references is fine. Citing it in sponsorship requests like this one might raise some suspicion like it did on my side. I would've just replaced the url with 'down' or 'no longer available'. I'm not sure if there is still some kind of active upstream, could not find something so far. Sven -- There we were, the three of us, the thief the king and I. Finally, we were forced to see, we were equals in the night. [Streetlight Manifesto - The three of us] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131228212038.gh3...@garkbit.lan
Bug#718792: marked as done (RFS: fio 2.11)
Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2013 22:04:25 +0100 with message-id 20131228210425.gf3...@garkbit.lan and subject line Re: bug 718792 (sponsorship-request on fio) still open? has caused the Debian Bug report #718792, regarding RFS: fio 2.11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 718792: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=718792 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Sven, Michael, tokkee, mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package fio: * Package name: fio Version : 2.1.1-1 Upstream Author : Jens Axboe ax...@kernel.dk * URL : http://freshmeat.net/projects/fio * License : GPL-2 Section : utils It builds those binary packages: fio - flexible I/O tester To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://packages.qa.debian.org/fio Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://people.teamix.net/~ms/debian/new/fio_2.1.1-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: fio (2.1.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * Imported Upstream version 2.1.1 * Updated to Standards-Version to 3.9.4, no changes needed. * debian/patches/ftbfs-fix-for-mips-architecture: Dropped. Applied upstream. * debian/patches/makefile-clean-delete-config-log-and-d-files: Delete config.log and *.d files as leaving them behind make repeated dpkg-buildpackage builds fail with: dpkg-source: info: local changes detected, … * debian/patches/manpage-spelling: Fix lintian tag spelling-error-in-manpage. * debian/control: Added build dependency zlib1g-dev as fio can use zlib to compress client/server communication. * Switched to xz compression. Saved almost 37 KiB on binary package. -- Martin Steigerwald m...@teamix.de Mon, 05 Aug 2013 16:15:21 +0200 Regards, -- Martin Steigerwald - teamix GmbH - http://www.teamix.de gpg: 19E3 8D42 896F D004 08AC A0CA 1E10 C593 0399 AE90 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 09:36:12PM +0100, Willi Mann wrote: Hello Martin, Hello Sven, is there a particular reason why this bug on sponsorship-requests is still open? Hi, because nobody closed it; I for one do not really like the RFS in bugs thingy and constantly ignore/forget the bug closing after uploads. Sven -- There we were, the three of us, the thief the king and I. Finally, we were forced to see, we were equals in the night. [Streetlight Manifesto - The three of us]---End Message---
Bug#733258: RFS: kerneltop/0.8-2.2 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable]
I contacted Authors but emails do not longer exist. I still think that this tools is somehow worth keeping. I could not find any alternative to it either. On 28 December 2013 22:20, Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de wrote: On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 03:34:37PM +0100, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote: Yes I know. This URL was in the original package, I could not find alternative resource. I will try to contact upstream, especially when I have patches to forward. I am quite new to this and I am not sure what should be done in this situation. Keeping it in the debian/copyright file for historic references is fine. Citing it in sponsorship requests like this one might raise some suspicion like it did on my side. I would've just replaced the url with 'down' or 'no longer available'. I'm not sure if there is still some kind of active upstream, could not find something so far. Sven -- There we were, the three of us, the thief the king and I. Finally, we were forced to see, we were equals in the night. [Streetlight Manifesto - The three of us] -- Pozdrawiam, Dariusz Dwornikowski, Assistant Institute of Computing Science, Poznań University of Technology www.cs.put.poznan.pl/ddwornikowski/ room 2.7.2 BTiCW | tel. +48 61 665 29 41
Bug#733455: RFS: grap/1.44-1 [ITA]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package grap * Package name: grap Version : 1.44-1 Upstream Author : Ted Faber fa...@lunabase.org * URL : http://www.lunabase.org/~faber/Vault/software/grap/ * License : other Section : text It builds those binary packages: grap - program for typesetting graphs To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/grap Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/grap/grap_1.44-1.dsc More information about this can be obtained from http://www.lunabase.org/~faber/Vault/software/grap/ Changes since the last upload: * New maintainer. Closes: #615895 * New Upstream Version * Remove override_dh_clean from debian/rules * Remove all patches, since are not current or fixed in upstream * Update Standards-Version to 3.9.5 Regards, Matus Valo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52bf5b81.1010...@gmail.com
Re: Restrictive Artwork License
Felix Natter fnat...@gmx.net writes: (upstream) Freeplane 1.3.x will have new icons (application icon, document icon), but the artist wants to keep all rights and only grant the Freeplane project all rights of use. -- Is that ok for Debian? No, it's not. See DFSG#1, #7, and possibly #8 too. But mostly #7. -- Is it even compatible with the GPL-2+ license of Freeplane? It's early in the morning, but my gut feeling is that no, it would not be compatible. -- |8] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87y534jyvw.fsf@algernon.balabit
Re: Restrictive Artwork License
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Gergely Nagy alger...@balabit.hu wrote: -- Is it even compatible with the GPL-2+ license of Freeplane? It's early in the morning, but my gut feeling is that no, it would not be compatible. Why not? It's not uncommon for an upstream to give their code and their art/data assets different licenses. In fact, it's quite common for packages maintained in the Games team, e.g. 0 A.D. imposes a GPL2+ license on their game engine and a CC-BY-SA license on all their artwork, music, and other game assets. There are also a number of games packages where the engine is DFSG-compatible but the game assets are under some non DFSG-compatible license (usually due to a non-commercial usage clause), and thus packaged in Debian by putting the engine in contrib and data in non-free. The upstream Freeplane developers are well within their rights to include non DFSG-compatible artwork if they wish. It just means that we have to strip them out / replace them (c.f. Firefox/Iceweasel), or move the package from main to non-free. Regards, Vincent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caczd_tcvrjeymwo1hd3o-rd5ghpe5tuwdd_cwubeb7mhxcl...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Restrictive Artwork License
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 07:36:42PM +0100, Felix Natter wrote: (upstream) Freeplane 1.3.x will have new icons (application icon, document icon), but the artist wants to keep all rights and only grant the Freeplane project all rights of use. -- Is that ok for Debian? Not for Debian main, no. You will have to strip the icons from the software, or move it to non-free. -- Is it even compatible with the GPL-2+ license of Freeplane? Yes[*] Thanks and Happy New Year, -- Felix Natter [*]: So long as the icons are totally and sepretely loaded. For instance, no one would claim the GPL'd GIMP program can only edit GPL compatable images, just as in the general case, I don't think it's a problem for a GPL'd program to render or load in non-GPL'd assets. Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Restrictive Artwork License
Hi, I would tend to agree with what Paul wrote but IANAL and you should ask on debian-legal for a more authoritative answer. A few more comments below: Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org wrote: On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 07:36:42PM +0100, Felix Natter wrote: (upstream) Freeplane 1.3.x will have new icons (application icon, document icon), but the artist wants to keep all rights and only grant the Freeplane project all rights of use. -- Is that ok for Debian? Not for Debian main, no. You will have to strip the icons from the software, or move it to non-free. The author should provide a clear license, e.g. using Creative Commons, as even redistributing artwork might be understood as a right of use, which Debian wouldn't have and hence even non-free would be impossible. -- Is it even compatible with the GPL-2+ license of Freeplane? Yes[*] I guess, it means that having the icons in a jar file isn't OK, having them in the file system is OK, but java was always a border case because it doesn't link as it was understood when the GPL2 was written (GPL3 might even be another story). The easiest would be if upstream would change their plans and not take this artwork, no icon justifies the trouble, but I know upstream, coolness vs. legal were always difficult discussions ;-) Thanks and Happy New Year, All the same, Eric -- Felix Natter [*]: So long as the icons are totally and sepretely loaded. For instance, no one would claim the GPL'd GIMP program can only edit GPL compatable images, just as in the general case, I don't think it's a problem for a GPL'd program to render or load in non-GPL'd assets. Cheers, Paul I'm on debian-java, java maintainers, vdr maintainers and debian-mentors; no need to CC me on these lists. Thanks!
