Re: git-buildpackage python3, python3.4: not found
Hi Stuart,
On 05/01/2014 01:58 AM, Stuart Prescott wrote:
Hi Alex,
$git-buildpackage --git-pbuilder --git-arch=amd64
dh clean --with python2,python3 --buildsystem=pybuild
dh_testdir -O--buildsystem=pybuild
dh_auto_clean -O--buildsystem=pybuild
I: pybuild base:170: python2.7 setup.py clean
running clean
removing
'/home/toor/debian-med/python-multipletau/.pybuild/pythonX.Y_2.7/build'
(and everything under it)
'build/bdist.linux-x86_64' does not exist -- can't clean it
'build/scripts-2.7' does not exist -- can't clean it
I: pybuild base:170: python3.4 setup.py clean
/bin/sh: 1: python3.4: not found
E: pybuild pybuild:256: clean: plugin distutils failed with: exit
code=127: python3.4 setup.py clean
dh_auto_clean: pybuild --clean -i python{version} -p 3.4 --dir .
returned exit code 13
make: *** [clean] Error 13
gbp:error: Couldn't run 'fakeroot debian/rules clean': fakeroot
debian/rules clean returned 2
This looks like gbp running clean on your host system (check the directory
shown in the output). After it has run clean, it will build the source
package and then after it has built the source package it will copy the
source package into your cowbuilder/pbuilder chroot to actually build the
package.
I see.
To fix that, you need to either:
1) install the packages on your *host* system that are required for
debian/rules clean to work outside the chroot.
The python3-all and python3-setuptools were missing on the host system.
2) tell git-buildpackage not to clean prior to building.
If it's only python3 involved, then (1) is probably the path of least
resistance.
If other packages are required in the clean stage and they're not available
for your host system, then that is harder to deal with and you need to think
about (2). If you have a clean git workflow, this clean-outside-the-chroot
step is unnecessary and would be a no-op; you should be able to tell git-
buildpackage not to do that. I have in the past added --git-
cleaner=/bin/true to get around this sort of problem but the documentation
for --git-pbuilder indicates it would ignore this option. There should be
some way of preventing cleaning before entering the chroot but, as usual
with our build tools, there are too many levels of indirection involved to
make this easy to work out (iirc, here it's git-buildpackage → git-pbuilder
→ cowbuilder → pbuilder → and eventually dpkg-buildpackage ... and I
probably missed pdebuild in there somewhere).
cheers
Stuart
So after installing python3-all and python3-setuptools it is working,
thank you a lot for the detailed explanation!
Best regards,
Alex
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5361e483.7090...@biotec.tu-dresden.de
Bug#746369: AW: Bug#746369: RFS: downtimed/0.6.2
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von:Cameron Norman camerontnor...@gmail.com One thing I noticed is that upstream has an Upstart job, but you are not shipping it. Simply making a symlink from debian/downtimed.upstart to startup-scripts/upstart-startup.conf should do the trick. Updated package is present on mentors with the appropriate upstart link. Thank you. Stefan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/zarafa.53620cd6.2cb1.1005ace21941152d@srv1.localhost
Re: git-buildpackage python3, python3.4: not found
Hi Alex, Maybe Alex is not using an autobuilder so needs to install python3-all manually on the build machine? I'm glad to hear your package build is now working :-) Not sure what autobuilder is , but I use a minimal base system and recently have updated it. I meant any system which will download and install build dependencies for you automatically. Personally I use pbuilder, see: http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/114 (the above is an old article but contains a good explanation) Debian itself uses buildd: https://www.debian.org/devel/buildd/ Cheers! Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5362126c.1020...@64studio.com
Can't push new mcron package to FTP
Hello, a couple of days ago I uploaded a new version of mcron to the upload FTP server, and heard not a titter about it (it does not seem to have gone through). It is a while since I last did this... can someone help me please? Thanks, Dale. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Can't push new mcron package to FTP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, a couple of days ago I uploaded a new version of mcron to the upload FTP server, and heard not a titter about it (it does not seem to have gone through). It is a while since I last did this... can someone help me please? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlNid8kACgkQ5KKKrDEYI0JxjwCdHgHVM1XLmLl8LZRa8krUv7ie 8hEAn0YhauA0w62OicoEnwAnorzMMtgP =Cea5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1wfu06-00048q...@rdmp.org
Re: Can't push new mcron package to FTP
Hi, On 01/05/14 18:41, Dale Mellor wrote: Hello, a couple of days ago I uploaded a new version of mcron to the upload FTP server, and heard not a titter about it (it does not seem to have gone through). It is a while since I last did this... can someone help me please? To which FTP server? Using which method, which steps? You're not a DD, aren't you (if you don't know what a DD is, you're not one)? Cheers, Eric -- I'm subscribed on debian-java, debian-mentors, pkg-java-maintainers and pkg-vdr-dvb-devel. No need to CC me on these lists. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53628654.80...@lavar.de
Re: Can't push new mcron package to FTP
This is a question for the ftpteam, but here's the reason why:: Apr 29 14:22:47 processing /mcron_1.0.7-1_i386.changes Apr 29 14:22:47 GnuPG signature check failed on mcron_1.0.7-1_i386.changes Apr 29 14:22:47 /mcron_1.0.7-1_i386.changes has bad PGP/GnuPG signature! Apr 29 14:22:47 Removing /mcron_1.0.7-1_i386.changes, but keeping its associated files for now. Apr 30 14:22:42 Deleted stray file /mcron_1.0.7-1_i386.deb Apr 30 14:22:42 Deleted stray file /mcron_1.0.7-1.dsc Apr 30 14:22:42 Deleted stray file /mcron_1.0.7-1.debian.tar.gz Apr 30 14:22:42 Deleted stray file /mcron_1.0.7.orig.tar.gz Was it signed by a key in the keyring? Cheers, Paul On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:38 PM, dale_mel...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, a couple of days ago I uploaded a new version of mcron to the upload FTP server, and heard not a titter about it (it does not seem to have gone through). It is a while since I last did this... can someone help me please? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlNid8kACgkQ5KKKrDEYI0JxjwCdHgHVM1XLmLl8LZRa8krUv7ie 8hEAn0YhauA0w62OicoEnwAnorzMMtgP =Cea5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1wfu06-00048q...@rdmp.org -- All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors. #define sizeof(x) rand() :wq -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cao6p2qrzb_aedtm3ajeariyoqrvm8116zg-grs5rxvntdqf...@mail.gmail.com
RFS: libcdio 0.92
libcdio (GPL) is stuck at an outdated version 0.83 in Debian New packaging exists for upstream release 0.92: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libcdio libcdio authors request to get the upstream release packaged and sponsored and landed in Debian because package Maintainer is absent for two years. - Eric Shattow
Re: RFS: libcdio 0.92
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Eric Shattow luc...@gmail.com wrote: libcdio (GPL) is stuck at an outdated version 0.83 in Debian New packaging exists for upstream release 0.92: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libcdio libcdio authors request to get the upstream release packaged and sponsored and landed in Debian because package Maintainer is absent for two years. Please contact the MIA team [1] and ask them to orphan the package if the current maintainer is inactive. Also take a look at the procedure documented in devref 7.4 [2]. Regards, Vincent [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/MIA [2] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/beyond-pkging.html#mia-qa -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CACZd_tC3QbQ4fMLK0ZdbwVQrqzi3bNDaJKN=cxjpxnzk3wv...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: libcdio 0.92
Will do, have contacted MIA team. Eric
Re: Can't push new mcron package to FTP
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 19:37 +0200, Eric L. wrote: Hi, On 01/05/14 18:41, Dale Mellor wrote: Hello, a couple of days ago I uploaded a new version of mcron to the upload FTP server, and heard not a titter about it (it does not seem to have gone through). It is a while since I last did this... can someone help me please? To which FTP server? Using which method, which steps? You're not a DD, aren't you (if you don't know what a DD is, you're not one)? Cheers, Eric -- I'm subscribed on debian-java, debian-mentors, pkg-java-maintainers and pkg-vdr-dvb-devel. No need to CC me on these lists. Is this person always this condescending or am I being bullied? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Can't push new mcron package to FTP
Ah right, now I see the problem. Thanks for the hint about the FTP team. Most likely my key is not, in fact, in the keyring, so my question to the mentors' list is, will somebody help me put the new release through please? It is needed w.r.t. bug #746006, and its release is holding up the upgrade from guile-1.8 to guile-2.0 in unstable. All help greatly appreciated, Dale On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 13:47 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: This is a question for the ftpteam, but here's the reason why:: Apr 29 14:22:47 processing /mcron_1.0.7-1_i386.changes Apr 29 14:22:47 GnuPG signature check failed on mcron_1.0.7-1_i386.changes Apr 29 14:22:47 /mcron_1.0.7-1_i386.changes has bad PGP/GnuPG signature! Apr 29 14:22:47 Removing /mcron_1.0.7-1_i386.changes, but keeping its associated files for now. Apr 30 14:22:42 Deleted stray file /mcron_1.0.7-1_i386.deb Apr 30 14:22:42 Deleted stray file /mcron_1.0.7-1.dsc Apr 30 14:22:42 Deleted stray file /mcron_1.0.7-1.debian.tar.gz Apr 30 14:22:42 Deleted stray file /mcron_1.0.7.orig.tar.gz Was it signed by a key in the keyring? Cheers, Paul On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:38 PM, dale_mel...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, a couple of days ago I uploaded a new version of mcron to the upload FTP server, and heard not a titter about it (it does not seem to have gone through). It is a while since I last did this... can someone help me please? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlNid8kACgkQ5KKKrDEYI0JxjwCdHgHVM1XLmLl8LZRa8krUv7ie 8hEAn0YhauA0w62OicoEnwAnorzMMtgP =Cea5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1wfu06-00048q...@rdmp.org -- All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors. #define sizeof(x) rand() :wq signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Can't push new mcron package to FTP
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Dale Mellor d...@rdmp.org wrote: Ah right, now I see the problem. Thanks for the hint about the FTP team. Most likely my key is not, in fact, in the keyring, so my question to the mentors' list is, will somebody help me put the new release through please? It is needed w.r.t. bug #746006, and its release is holding up the upgrade from guile-1.8 to guile-2.0 in unstable. If you're looking for someone to sponsor your package, please upload the source package somewhere (e.g. mentors.debian.net) and file a request for sponsorship (RFS) bug against the sponsorship-requests pseudo-package (e.g. by using reportbug). Also see step #4 in the mentors.d.n intro page [1]. Regards, Vincent [1] http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/caczd_tbcayp7cax4ibxwfbyypls2s40tfecsvbnsy0qvl3x...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#746620: RFS: sxiv/1.2-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package sxiv * Package name: sxiv * Version : 1.2-1 * Upstream Author : Bert Münnich be.muenn...@googlemail.com * URL : https://github.com/muennich/sxiv * License : GPL-2.0+ Section : graphics It builds those binary packages: sxiv - simple X image viewer To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/sxiv Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sxiv/sxiv_1.2-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: New upstream release * debian/control + Bump standard versions 3.9.5 (no changes) * debian/patches + Refresh allow-cflags-override.diff patch + Install icons + Refresh fix_sxiv.desktop-file.diff patch + Add fix_manpage.diff + Fix hyphen-used-as-minus-sign lintian warning in manpage * Add debian/sxiv.xpm * Add debian/sxiv.install * Add debian/sxiv.menu * debian/copyright + Update to DEP5 copyright format 1.0 + Extend copyright holders years Regards, Daniel Echeverry -- Daniel Echeverry http://wiki.debian.org/DanielEcheverry Linux user: #477840 Debian user Software libre http://www.rinconinformatico.net
Re: Can't push new mcron package to FTP
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Dale Mellor wrote: Is this person always this condescending or am I being bullied? As far as I can tell there was neither condescension nor bullying in the mail by Eric, he was simply asking for some more information that he wasn't able to determine from your question. As to your question, I can't see any record of mcron being uploaded to mentors.d.n. I'm guessing you uploaded it to the main archive by mistake and it got deleted automatically. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/caktje6eftwur8hsfgu5xzbpxfdauezx0ojwrdfwcgc4uyia...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#746184: marked as done (RFS: gcc-4.9-doc/4.9.0-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Fri, 02 May 2014 04:23:55 + with message-id e1wg50t-0004hb...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: gcc-4.9-doc/4.9.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #746184, regarding RFS: gcc-4.9-doc/4.9.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 746184: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746184 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package gcc-4.9-doc, based on gcc-4.8-doc, which is already in jessie/sid. A git repo is set up to track the packaging work[1]. [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/yixuan-guest/gcc-doc.git * Package name: gcc-4.9-doc Version : 4.9.0-1 Upstream Author : FSF * URL : http://gcc.gnu.org/ * License : GFDL-1.3+, with invariant sections Section : non-free/doc Programming Lang: Texinfo Description : documentation for the GNU compilers It builds those binary packages: cpp-4.9-doc - documentation for the GNU C preprocessor (cpp) gcc-4.9-doc - documentation for the GNU compilers (gcc, gobjc, g++) gccgo-4.9-doc - documentation for the GNU Go compiler (gccgo) gcj-4.9-doc - documentation for the GNU Java tools (gcj, gij) gfortran-4.9-doc - documentation for the GNU Fortran Compiler (gfortran) gnat-4.9-doc - documentation for the GNU Ada Compiler (gnat) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/gcc-4.9-doc Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/g/gcc-4.9-doc/gcc-4.9-doc_4.9.0-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload of gcc-4.8-doc: * New upstream branch. (Closes: #745968) * Synced patches with gcc-4.9, 4.9.0-1. New patches: - from-debian-gcc-alpha-ieee-doc.diff - from-debian-gcc-rename-info-files.diff - from-debian-gcc-gdc-4.9-doc.diff - from-debian-gcc-svn-doc-updates.diff * Refreshed patches: - from-debian-gcc-gdc-4.9-doc.diff - fix-direntry.diff - gnat-cross-references.diff * Updated debian/copyright. Cheers, GUO Yixuan ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package gcc-4.9-doc version 4.9.0-1 is in NEW now, and the package at mentors is not newer (2014-04-27) than the package in NEW (2014-04-27), so there is currently no package to sponsor. http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/gcc-4.9-doc_4.9.0-1.html http://mentors.debian.net/package/gcc-4.9-doc Please remove the package from mentors or mark it needs sponsor = no. If for some reason you need to replace the package in NEW, then you can upload an updated package to mentors and feel free to reopen this RFS 746184 or open a new RFS.---End Message---
Bug#746620: RFS: sxiv/1.2-1
* Daniel Echeverry epsilo...@gmail.com, 2014-05-01, 20:21: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sxiv/sxiv_1.2-1.dsc There's something wrong with the changelog. It includes entries for 1.1-1 and 1.1-2, which were never uploaded AFAICT; but OTOH it doesn't include entries for 1.1.1-1 and 1.1.1-2, which the previous version did include. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140502052715.ga8...@jwilk.net
Re: Can't push new mcron package to FTP
Hi, On 2 May 2014 03:59:15 CEST, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote: On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Dale Mellor wrote: Is this person always this condescending or am I being bullied? As far as I can tell there was neither condescension nor bullying in the mail by Eric, he was simply asking for some more information that he wasn't able to determine from your question. Thanks, Paul, it's exactly like that. As to your question, I can't see any record of mcron being uploaded to mentors.d.n. I'm guessing you uploaded it to the main archive by mistake and it got deleted automatically. And I was too lazy or too stupid to guess so much ;-) Regards, Eric I'm on debian-java, java maintainers, vdr maintainers and debian-mentors; no need to CC me on these lists. Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/6ab5aa6e-d7cf-41b7-97d7-3daf9e3ee...@email.android.com
