Bug#754202: Gamera/3.4.1-1
Here, everything's ready to push the updated dependency immediately after wxpython3.0 hits Sid, also for a 3.4.1-2. Greetings, Daniel On 23.07.2014 03:53, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 19:21:35 Jakub Wilk wrote: As the bug says, there is no wxPython 3.0 in Debian yet... True, but the following bug was just filed: transition: wxpython3.0 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755757 -- http://www.danielstender.com/blog/ PGP key: 2048R/E41BD2D0 C879 5E41 1ED7 EE80 0F2E 7D0C DBDD 4D96 E41B D2D0 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53cf7d77.8050...@danielstender.com
Bug#754962: RFS: tiptop/2.2 [ITP] -- performance monitoring tool for Linux
On 18/07/14 15:38, Vincent Legout wrote: Hi Tomasz, Hi Vincent, how sponsors are able to spot all these things, amazes me. :) Tomasz Buchert tomasz.buch...@inria.fr writes: I am looking for a sponsor for my package tiptop: I'm interested in sponsoring tiptop, I just have some comments: The package doesn't provide the tiptoprc file from upstream. I think it would make sense to install it somewhere even if it is not used, maybe in /usr/share/doc/tiptop. Done. It seems the git repository and the dsc on mentors differ. I think the git version is correct, you only need to close #754932. The descriptions are also different. Yeah, it was kind of mess, but it should be fine now (I retitled bugs as well). According to the source files in src/, the copyright is 2011-2014 Inria. Thus I believe you should also add Inria in debian/copyright. Done. In debian/copyright, tiptop is GPL-2 but you used the text for GPL-2+ (i.e. with or (at your option) any later version). You also have 2 identical paragraphs for the debian/ directory. I think it is fixed now. However, if you could verify license boilerplate for GPL-2, I would appreciate it. I can't build the package twice in a row. Not sure why, but maybe because these files are not deleted by dh clean: Makefile, config.h, config.log, config.status and src/Makefile. I didn't investigate too much but it also seems that running debclean twice in a row fails because ./configure is removed by dh_autoreconf_clean and is needed in Makefile. I delete these spurious files in dh_clean now. It is a bit hackish, though, but I've contacted upstream about this issue. Consider it to be a temporary workaround. I think there is a typo in the manpage: s/if forked/is forked/ Patch queue updated and upstream informed. Could you please fix this and I'll be happy to upload tiptop. The work is here: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/tiptop.git/ (starting with b2ee0ea83) The new upload here: http://mentors.debian.net/package/tiptop Thanks, Vincent Cheers, Tomasz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140723095737.ga...@buchert.pl
Bug#754962: marked as done (RFS: tiptop/2.2-1 [ITP] -- performance monitoring tool for Linux)
Your message dated Wed, 23 Jul 2014 08:50:12 -0400 with message-id 8761io5jej@cecht.legt.fr and subject line Re: Bug#754962: RFS: tiptop/2.2 [ITP] -- performance monitoring tool for Linux has caused the Debian Bug report #754962, regarding RFS: tiptop/2.2-1 [ITP] -- performance monitoring tool for Linux to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 754962: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754962 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package tiptop: Package Name: tiptop Version : 2.2 Upstream Author : Erven Rohou URL : http://tiptop.gforge.inria.fr/ License : GPL2 Section : utils It builds those binary packages: tiptop - performance monitoring for Linux via hardware counters To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/tiptop Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tiptop/tiptop_2.2-1.dsc The relevant bugs are: * http://bugs.debian.org/754932 (RFP) * http://bugs.debian.org/754947 (ITP) More information about hello can be obtained from http://tiptop.gforge.inria.fr/. Regards, Tomasz Buchert ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi, Tomasz Buchert tomasz.buch...@inria.fr writes: In debian/copyright, tiptop is GPL-2 but you used the text for GPL-2+ (i.e. with or (at your option) any later version). You also have 2 identical paragraphs for the debian/ directory. I think it is fixed now. However, if you could verify license boilerplate for GPL-2, I would appreciate it. It seems fine to me. Could you please fix this and I'll be happy to upload tiptop. The work is here: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/tiptop.git/ (starting with b2ee0ea83) The new upload here: http://mentors.debian.net/package/tiptop Uploaded, thanks for your work. Vincent---End Message---
Bug#755380: marked as done (RFS: simple-scan/3.13.4.2-1 [ITA])
Your message dated Wed, 23 Jul 2014 16:24:37 + with message-id e1x9zlj-0001a9...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: simple-scan/3.13.4.2-1 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #755380, regarding RFS: simple-scan/3.13.4.2-1 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 755380: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755380 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package simple-scan Package name: simple-scan Version : 3.13.3-1 Upstream Author : Robert Ancell robert.anc...@canonical.com URL : https://launchpad.net/simple-scan License : GPL-3+ Section : gnome It builds those binary packages: simple-scan - Simple Scanning Utility simple-scan-dbg - Simple Scanning Utility - debugging symbols To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/simple-scan Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/simple-scan/simple-scan_3.13.3-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * New Maintainer ( Closes: #720540 ). * debian/control - change Standards-Version to 3.9.5 ( no changes ). - Build-Depends - change valac to = 0.24.0 ( Closes: #739167, #755204 ). - remove lsb-release ( Closes: #737536 ) - add Depends on Package sample-scan - dbus-x11 ( Closes: #750392 ). - remove Vcs-Bzr * Add debian/source/options: - set compression to xz compression-level to 9. * Add debian/simple-scan.bug-script. * New Upstram Release. * Refresh patches. Regards, Jörg Frings-Fürst -- pgp Fingerprint: 7D13 3C60 0A10 DBE1 51F8 EBCB 422B 44B0 BE58 1B6E pgp Key: BE581B6E CAcert Key S/N: 0E:D4:56 Jörg Frings-Fürst D-54526 Niederkail Threema: SYR8SJXB IRC: j_...@freenode.net j_...@oftc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package simple-scan version 3.13.4.2-1 is in unstable now. http://packages.qa.debian.org/simple-scan---End Message---
Bug#755842: RFS: tintii/2.9.0-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package tintii * Package name: tintii * Version : 2.9.0-1 * Upstream Author : Lawrence Murray * URL : http://www.indii.org/software/tintii/ * License : GPL-2.0 * Section : graphics It builds those binary packages: tintii - Turns colour photos into b/w and highlights regions in colour To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/tintii Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tintii/tintii_2.9.0-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release. * debian/control + Bump standard versions 3.9.5 (no changes). + Use wrap-and-sort. Regards, Daniel Echeverry -- Daniel Echeverry http://wiki.debian.org/DanielEcheverry Linux user: #477840 Debian user Software libre http://www.rinconinformatico.net
Bug#754441: GMastermind Relicensing
Hi Riley, the program comes with a COPYING file, which standard to contain the license used. In thiscase, it contains the GPL v2 or later. In other words: 1) the program headers contain reference to the GPL v2 or later 2) the COPYING file distirbuted with GMastermind contains the GPL v2 or later text 3) only the readme file contains a reference to the program being distributed GPL v2 without the or later clause To me it is clear that the intent is the program to be under GPLv2 or later and that the readme.txt contains a small omission. The source files and the COPYING file have priority! Given this, I already consider all my contributions under the GPL v2 or later clause. Riccardo On 2014-07-22 09:26:48 +0200 Riley Baird bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch wrote: Hi Riccardo, Even if you're not the original author, if you've made any modifications to the work, you own copyright on them. For example, Linus Torvalds is not the only copyright holder of Linux; the other ~5000 contributors all have copyright on it as well. This is why the kernel can't be upgraded to GPL-3, even if Linus wants to. So, having a statement from you would be helpful. (You are only relicensing *your* contributions) Also, what do you mean by the COPYING is the full GPL v2 or later? Riley -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/41907304f31a2276af95a6171fae9323@grid
Bug#755855: RFS: liblaxjson/1.0.2-1 [ITP] -- relaxed JSON streaming parser C library
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package liblaxjson: * Package name: liblaxjson Version : 1.0.2-1 Upstream Author : Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com * URL : https://github.com/andrewrk/liblaxjson * License : Expat Section : libs It builds these binary packages: liblaxjson-dev - relaxed streaming JSON parser library (development files) liblaxjson1 - relaxed streaming JSON parser library To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/liblaxjson Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libl/liblaxjson/liblaxjson_1.0.2-1.dsc Regards, Andrew Kelley
