Re: Bug#756436: RFS: mytop/1.9.1-2
Am 30.07.14 01:46, schrieb Paul Wise: On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:07 AM, Werner Detter wrote: Upload didn't work with message: Fixed now. Thanks, upload worked. Cheers, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53d8a271.1080...@aloah-from-hell.de
Bug#745135: RFS: mariadb-10.0/10.0.10-1 [ITP] -- Latest version of worlds most popular non-Oracle database
Thanks for your interest in the package. I am the submitter and I haven't gotten any feedback so far on the package, so I assume it is simply waiting for somebody to have time to review it. It is almost identical to the current mariadb-5.5 package in Debian, so there shouldn't be any actual issues - we just need to wait. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAHj_TLDe8NPHw57DV+TFmTF_QBv_P=bq6odubg6ilfkudeb...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#741465: marked as done (RFS: pythondialog/3.0.1-1 ITA NMU)
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:24:37 + with message-id e1xcwg9-0004ty...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: pythondialog/3.0.1-1 ITA NMU has caused the Debian Bug report #741465, regarding RFS: pythondialog/3.0.1-1 ITA NMU to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 741465: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=741465 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the orphaned package pythondialog * Package name: pythondialog Version : 3.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Florent Rougon f.rou...@free.fr * URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python2-pythondialog * License : LGPL2.1 Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-dialog - Python module for making simple Text/Console-mode user interfaces To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/pythondialog Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pythondialog/pythondialog_3.0.1-1.dsc More information about pythondialog can be obtained from http://pythondialog.sourceforge.net/. Changes since the last upload: Upgrade to now upstream release 3.0.1 (python2 backport) Regards, Andy Jacobsen signature.asc Description: PGP signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package pythondialog has been removed from mentors.---End Message---
Bug#755842: RFS: tintii/2.9.0-1
tags 755842 moreinfo thanks Hi Daniel, I have some issues and suggestions for your package. d/copyright: - In source code, there are upstream files dated as 2014. - I don't found the images/nuvola directory. - The Lawrence Murray files are using GPL-2.0+. Please, remove the extra blank lines at end of d/compat and d/tintii.menu. I suggest you put the upstream name and your name at end of manpage. It is a common procedure in Debian. An example: AUTHOR xyz was developed by Fulano Ikos ikos45...@gmail.com. This manual page was written by Joao Eriberto Mota Filho eribe...@debian.org for the Debian project (but may be used by others). If you need improve the manpage, ask me how to make it easily. Add to d/rules: export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND=-Wl,--as-needed to avoid these messages: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/tintii/usr/bin/tintii was not linked against libwx_baseu_net-3.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's symbols) dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/tintii/usr/bin/tintii was not linked against libwx_gtk2u_xrc-3.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's symbols) dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/tintii/usr/bin/tintii was not linked against libwx_baseu_xml-3.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's symbols) dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/tintii/usr/bin/tintii was not linked against libwx_gtk2u_qa-3.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's symbols) Your package is very good and clean. I will wait a reply. Thanks for your work. Regards, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJeJbRbj=3x4LEt2OE8FhtpOGLfVrCvcPuKvbFSCL+=-x...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#669411: marked as done (RFS: qdacco/0.8.2-2 (package already in Debian))
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:53:33 -0300 with message-id 20140730155333.2af5ddfad433f13baadc9...@debian.org and subject line Re: RFS: qdacco/0.8.2-2 (package already in Debian) has caused the Debian Bug report #669411, regarding RFS: qdacco/0.8.2-2 (package already in Debian) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 669411: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669411 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package qdacco-0.8.2-2. The package is already in the Debian archive: It's an update. The last sponsor package seems to be not currently active. It builds those binary packages: libqdaccolib-dev - library for facilitate access to dacco dictionary (devel) libqdaccolib0.7 - library for facilitate access to dacco dictionary (runtime) qdacco - offline Dacco Catalan - English dictionary frontend (qt) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/qdacco Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qdacco/qdacco_0.8.2-2.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: * Update debian/libqdaccolib0.7.symbols to fix FTBFS (LP: #935394). * Update to Standards-Version 3.9.3 (no changes required). * Update debian/copyright file to v. 1.0 format. * Change the Homepage field in debian/control file. * Fix bug in debian/watch hrefs line. Regards, Innocent De Marchi ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- No package in mentors.d.o. So, I am closing this bug. Regards, Eriberto pgpujDQoMXj0d.pgp Description: PGP signature ---End Message---
Bug#728132: marked as done (RFS: qdacco/0.8.2-2 [RC]: package already in Debian with RC bug.)
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:53:33 -0300 with message-id 20140730155333.2af5ddfad433f13baadc9...@debian.org and subject line Re: RFS: qdacco/0.8.2-2 (package already in Debian) has caused the Debian Bug report #669411, regarding RFS: qdacco/0.8.2-2 [RC]: package already in Debian with RC bug. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 669411: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669411 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package qdacco * Package name: qdacco Version : 0.8.2-2 Upstream Author : Carles Pina * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/dacco/ * License : GPL-3+ Section : text It builds those binary packages: libqdaccolib-dev - library for facilitate access to dacco dictionary (devel) libqdaccolib0.7 - library for facilitate access to dacco dictionary (runtime) qdacco - offline Dacco Catalan - English dictionary frontend (qt) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/qdacco Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qdacco/qdacco_0.8.2-2.dsc Regards, Innocent De Marchi ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- No package in mentors.d.o. So, I am closing this bug. Regards, Eriberto pgpSfGKDmZlKo.pgp Description: PGP signature ---End Message---
Bug#753649: marked as done (RFS: liblinux-inotify2-perl/1:1.22-1 [ITA] -- scalable directory and file change notification)
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:54:49 -0300 with message-id 20140730155449.828271d45f8559ffb36c5...@debian.org and subject line Re: RFS: liblinux-inotify2-perl/1:1.22-1 [ITA] -- scalable directory and file change notification has caused the Debian Bug report #753649, regarding RFS: liblinux-inotify2-perl/1:1.22-1 [ITA] -- scalable directory and file change notification to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 753649: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753649 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package liblinux-inotify2-perl. I am a DM and I need the first upload only. * Package name: liblinux-inotify2-perl Version : 1:1.22-1 Upstream Author : Marc Lehmann schm...@schmorp.de * URL : http://software.schmorp.de/pkg/Linux-Inotify2.html * License : Perl Section : perl It builds those binary packages: liblinux-inotify2-perl - scalable directory and file change notification To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/liblinux-inotify2-perl or http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/liblinux-inotify2-perl.git Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libl/liblinux-inotify2-perl/liblinux-inotify2-perl_1.22-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * New maintainer. Thanks a lot to Michael Bramer, the initial maintainer, for your nice work over this package. (Closes: #753547, #752852) * Ack NMU bugs: - Non-maintainer upload for the Perl 5.10 transition. Don't try to remove /usr/share/perl5 if it doesn't exist. (Closes: #463459) [1] - New upstream release. (Closes: #568423) [2] - Updated debhelper compatibility from 4 to 5. [2] - Only build on Linux-based architectures. [3] - New upstream version. (Closes: #639238) [3] - Thanks to: [1] Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org [2] Franck Joncourt fra...@debian.org [3] Hilko Bengen ben...@debian.org * Migrations: - debian format from 1.0 to 3.0. - debian/copyright to new format (1.0). - debian/rules: to new (reduced) format. - debhelper version from 5 to 9. - Standards-Version from 3.7.2 to 3.9.5. * debian/control: - Added the Homepage field. - Added the VCS fields. - Improved the short and long description. - Removed unusual extra leading space from short description. * debian/examples: added to install eg/* files. * debian/gbp.conf: added to allow git-buildpackage usage. * debian/patches/: added the eg patch to fix the interpreter path. * debian/watch: upgraded from version 2 to 3 and improved. Thanks a lot in advance. Regards, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Uploaded by me. Closing this bug. Eriberto pgp6HoP2ZGJUy.pgp Description: PGP signature ---End Message---
Bug#754260: RFS: terminology/0.6.0-1 [ITP]
Control: owner -1 ! Hey bofh80, * bofh80 afm...@gmail.com [2014-07-14 16:27:40 +0100]: Thanks for the feedback, I've uploaded 0.6.1 with an extra depends. I've checked in a vm without e17 installed this time to make sure it works first. If you'd be so kind as to check the new version and let me know? http://mentors.debian.net/package/terminology The respective dsc file can be found at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/terminology/terminology_0.6.1-1.dsc Sorry for the delay in getting back to you, I missed it, came before i subscribed to the mailing list. Terminology has piqued my interest for a while now, and I want to see it in Debian so I'll sponsor you. Here's my review: - debian/README.source is useless. - debian/copyright: - you're not Sebastian Reichel, are you? :) - ltmain.sh is GPL-2 - the copyright for src/bin/lz4 is missing - the copyright years need updating, and I think the authors list is outdated. - the *_eet.* seem to be autogenerated. ftpmasters will probably want them to be built from source, although not having source is fine wrt the license (BSD2). I don't see the source anywhere. - debian/control: - The descriptions need more work: the list of features needs trimming, and/or reformatting. - You might want to Suggest: libelementary-bin and let people know how to switch to OpenGL rendering in a README.Debian. Soft rendering is toasty. - debian/rules: - you should trim the comments/debmake foo and keep it simple. - DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS = 1 is the default in debhelper compat level 9 - please have debhelper pass --disable-silent-rules to configure. - I think the exports (from the upstream README) are useful at runtime. - debian/terminology.lintian-overrides: I'm not a big fan of overriding the binary-without-manpage lintian warning, but I won't make you write the manpages either (I like writing manpages, but I understand not everyone does). I'd leave the warning as a reminder that those extra executables need some documentation. - debian/changelog: I'd merge the two entries in a single one, as the first one never entered Debian. - debian/watch: it seems that upstream switched to bz2 tarballs. See https://wiki.debian.org/debian/watch#Common_mistakes for a hint. Furthermore the 0.6.1 version doesn't exist there. You should either update it or provide a get-orig-source target in d/rules to rebuild the tarball you used. Build is ok, lintian seems happy. Things seem to run fine too. Setting aside the sourceless files bit, those issues shouldn't be very hard to fix. Please talk to upstream about the autogenerated files, we really want to ship the source, and ideally, we need the machinery to regenerate them at build time. Cheers, -- Nicolas Dandrimont BOFH excuse #191: Just type 'mv * /dev/null'. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#749532: marked as done (RFS: goldeneye/0.0~git20140221.7a38fe93-1 [ITP] -- HTTP DoS test tool)
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:56:35 -0300 with message-id 20140730155635.a5b47cbe3ff4b73fc7b95...@debian.org and subject line Re: RFS: goldeneye/0.0~git20140221.7a38fe93-1 [ITP] -- HTTP DoS test tool has caused the Debian Bug report #749532, regarding RFS: goldeneye/0.0~git20140221.7a38fe93-1 [ITP] -- HTTP DoS test tool to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 749532: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=749532 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package goldeneye. I am a DM and I need the first upload only. * Package name: goldeneye Version : 0.0~git20140221.7a38fe93-1 Upstream Author : Jan Seidl jse...@wroot.org * URL : https://github.com/jseidl/GoldenEye * License : GPL-3.0 Section : net It builds those binary packages: goldeneye - HTTP DoS test tool To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/goldeneye Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/goldeneye/goldeneye_0.0~git20140221.7a38fe93-1.dsc The GIT repository is: git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/goldeneye.git Thanks! Regards, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Uploaded by me. Closing this bug. Eriberto pgpr63ClqSfct.pgp Description: PGP signature ---End Message---
Bug#748893: marked as done (RFS: nield/0.5.1-1 [ITP] -- generate logs related to network interfaces)
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:58:28 -0300 with message-id 20140730155828.ee76db3ddb4ffa1aebcbd...@debian.org and subject line Re: RFS: nield/0.5.1-1 [ITP] -- generate logs related to network interfaces has caused the Debian Bug report #748893, regarding RFS: nield/0.5.1-1 [ITP] -- generate logs related to network interfaces to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 748893: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=748893 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package nield. I am a DM and I need the first upload only. * Package name: nield Version : 0.5.1-1 Upstream Author : Tetsumune KISO t2m...@gmail.com * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/nield * License : GPL-2.0+ Section : net It builds those binary packages: nield - generate logs related to network interfaces To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/nield Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nield/nield_0.5.1-1.dsc Regards, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Over my own control now. I will upload it. Closing this bug. Eriberto pgpL0talFYVIb.pgp Description: PGP signature ---End Message---
tslib RM bug
Hello, at the moment I'm working on tslib to adopt the package. I see that there is a RM bug[1] for tslib. I would like to continue working on it, hence my question: What is the best way to stop this and the blocking bugs? CU Jörg [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751768 -- pgp Fingerprint: 7D13 3C60 0A10 DBE1 51F8 EBCB 422B 44B0 BE58 1B6E pgp Key: BE581B6E CAcert Key S/N: 0E:D4:56 Jörg Frings-Fürst D-54526 Niederkail Threema: SYR8SJXB IRC: j_...@freenode.net j_...@oftc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#739911: RFS: gtk-theme-switch/2.1.0-4
tags 739911 moreinfo thanks Hi Marius, Please, update the d/copyright, putting all upstream names. See main.c. You should add the packaging years of Aaron (search this information in https://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gtk-theme-switch.html). Add any other maintainer if needed. Thanks for your work. Regards, Eriberto pgpCilSl03RuE.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#755842: RFS: tintii/2.9.0-1
Hi Eriberto! Thank you very much for review my package :) however another dd has contacted me and we are working to upload this new version in debian However taking advantage of your help, and because I am not a native english speaker and my sponsor told me it would be good to update the description,for this reason, I want to know if could you help me with tintii's description checking documentation and basing my poor English thought in something like this: Description: Photo filter for saturation control, especially selective colour effects. Tool for selective colour, saturation and hue shift photo adjustments. Rather than fixing the set of colours that you can adjust, or requiring you to manually select them, Tintii is uniquely able to automatically detect the major colours in a photo, making adjustments quick, easy and more precise than other means. What do you think? Really, thank you very much! and thanks for review the package! -- Daniel Echeverry http://wiki.debian.org/DanielEcheverry Linux user: #477840 Debian user Software libre http://www.rinconinformatico.net
Bug#755842: RFS: tintii/2.9.0-1
Ohh no!!! I am Brazilian... Not native too. Sorry. Please, close your RFS to avoid double efforts. Thanks for your reply. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-07-30 17:14 GMT-03:00 Daniel Echeverry epsilo...@gmail.com: Hi Eriberto! Thank you very much for review my package :) however another dd has contacted me and we are working to upload this new version in debian However taking advantage of your help, and because I am not a native english speaker and my sponsor told me it would be good to update the description,for this reason, I want to know if could you help me with tintii's description checking documentation and basing my poor English thought in something like this: Description: Photo filter for saturation control, especially selective colour effects. Tool for selective colour, saturation and hue shift photo adjustments. Rather than fixing the set of colours that you can adjust, or requiring you to manually select them, Tintii is uniquely able to automatically detect the major colours in a photo, making adjustments quick, easy and more precise than other means. What do you think? Really, thank you very much! and thanks for review the package! -- Daniel Echeverry http://wiki.debian.org/DanielEcheverry Linux user: #477840 Debian user Software libre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJc6k8ejsfjaoW9RfUx6gnchTF2gy3+4cp=zz_uk_7l...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#756042: RFS: sandboxgamemaker/2.8.2+dfsg-1 [ITA][RC]
retitle 756042 RFS: sandboxgamemaker/2.8.2+dfsg-1 [ITA][RC] tags 756042 moreinfo thanks Hi Anthony. Please: 1. Fix the Vcs* in d/control. The correct addresses are: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-games/sandboxgamemaker.git git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-games/sandboxgamemaker.git (in GIT you should put a tag after the upload to Debian only) 2. Remove the empty files d/docs and d/sandboxgamemaker. 3. Remove the comments from sandbox_unix.6. 4. I think that the d/postrm is useless. The DPKG know how to make it. Please, remove and test. 5. From sandboxgamemaker.docs, remove *url. If you want, you can write a d/README.Debian to list these urls. I think that you can do it with all documents in docs/. The _EDUCATORS_README.txt and DISCLAIMER.txt must be put into d/copyright and removed from docs. 6. Check if the content of d/README.source is being fulfilled. Note that the package is a monster (is big) and I can ask for other changes in future. I think you can try (now or in next revision) modernize the package. As an example, you can use the new (reduced) d/rules format. I hope I can help you. Regards, Eriberto pgplCi1tgcS8Q.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#756559: RFS: helpviewer.app/0.3-8 [RC] -- Online help viewer for GNUstep programs
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package helpviewer.app. It builds these binary packages: helpviewer.app - Online help viewer for GNUstep programs To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/helpviewer.app Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/helpviewer.app/helpviewer.app_0.3-8.dsc Changes since the last upload: * debian/source/format: Switch to 3.0 (quilt). * debian/compat: Set to 9. * debian/rules: Rewrite for modern dh. Append -finput-charset=ISO-8859-1 to OBJCFLAGS (Closes: #754848). * debian/README.source: Delete. * debian/preinst: Delete; no longer needed. * debian/control (Build-Depends): Remove quilt. Require libgnustep-gui-dev (= 0.24) and debhelper (= 9). (Vcs-Arch): Replace with Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser. (Standards-Version): Claim compliance with 3.9.5 as of this release. * debian/install: New file. * debian/HelpViewer.desktop: Add Keywords field. * debian/patches/gui0.24.patch: New; adapt to the new GNUstep API and fix a few related issues. * debian/patches/series: Update. * debian/copyright: Switch to format 1.0. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87ha1ywmo6@yavor.doganov.org
Bug#754260: RFS: terminology/0.6.0-1 [ITP]
Hi Nicolas The eet file source issues, i ran a 'find' and couldn't see the files your talking about, could you name one or two explicitly for me? When i mentioned them, the terminology devs seemed to think they were config files. (enlightenment has a thing about putting text into 'machine code' for faster parsing) there are tools like edje_cc edje_decc edje_recc etc Everything else has been taken care of and i have uploaded 0.6.1-2 for you to peruse. The respective dsc file can be found at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/terminology/terminology_0.6.1-2.dsc Thanks again Anthony
Bug#755049: RFS: libharu/2.3.0-1 (update)
tags 755049 moreinfo thanks Hi Johan, Please: 1. Update the packaging years in d/copyright. 2. If you removed files from original tarball, add a dfsg suffix to version. 3. Fix these lintian messages: I: libhpdf-2.3.0: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhpdf-2.3.0.so I: libhpdf-2.3.0: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhpdf-2.3.0.so Thanks for your work. Regards, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJcdsm5bEgOOyJ2Y=ds6peouqx7aaa9n9r5aytm_38o...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#756559: marked as done (RFS: helpviewer.app/0.3-8 [RC] -- Online help viewer for GNUstep programs)
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2014 22:49:45 -0300 with message-id 20140730224945.4f3033dc5b947c37325dd...@debian.org and subject line Re: RFS: helpviewer.app/0.3-8 [RC] -- Online help viewer for GNUstep programs has caused the Debian Bug report #756559, regarding RFS: helpviewer.app/0.3-8 [RC] -- Online help viewer for GNUstep programs to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 756559: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=756559 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package helpviewer.app. It builds these binary packages: helpviewer.app - Online help viewer for GNUstep programs To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/helpviewer.app Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/helpviewer.app/helpviewer.app_0.3-8.dsc Changes since the last upload: * debian/source/format: Switch to 3.0 (quilt). * debian/compat: Set to 9. * debian/rules: Rewrite for modern dh. Append -finput-charset=ISO-8859-1 to OBJCFLAGS (Closes: #754848). * debian/README.source: Delete. * debian/preinst: Delete; no longer needed. * debian/control (Build-Depends): Remove quilt. Require libgnustep-gui-dev (= 0.24) and debhelper (= 9). (Vcs-Arch): Replace with Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser. (Standards-Version): Claim compliance with 3.9.5 as of this release. * debian/install: New file. * debian/HelpViewer.desktop: Add Keywords field. * debian/patches/gui0.24.patch: New; adapt to the new GNUstep API and fix a few related issues. * debian/patches/series: Update. * debian/copyright: Switch to format 1.0. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Uploaded. Thanks for your work. Regards, Eriberto pgpICanefV0yq.pgp Description: PGP signature ---End Message---
Bug#756042: RFS: sandboxgamemaker/2.8.2+dfsg-1 [ITA][RC]
Hi Eriberto, Thank you for taking the time to look over the package. 1 to 5 done. Do you want me to upload a 2.8.2+dfsg-2 with my changes for review? EDIT: dpkg: warning: while removing sandboxgamemaker, directory '/usr/share/sandboxgamemaker' not empty so not removed After removing postrm i got this on apt-get purge. The data installed by postinst is still present on my system. (in GIT you should put a tag after the upload to Debian only) Noted, i'll remove the tag 6. Check if the content of d/README.source is being fulfilled. As far as i know this is correct, if you can be more explicit about anything i should be checking, or how i should be checking that would be great. (links to relevant documentation are also always welcome) Note that the package is a monster (is big) and I can ask for other changes in future. A monster it is. Anything you see that needs fixing will get fixed. I think you can try (now or in next revision) modernize the package. As an example, you can use the new (reduced) d/rules format. I'd like to, i didn't want to start breaking everything before getting it back into debian though, do you think it's possible to get it uploaded in it's current state and then work to bring it up to date? I hope I can help you. You already have, more help is graciously received. Kind Regards Anthony
Re: tslib RM bug
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: What is the best way to stop this and the blocking bugs? Personally I don't understand your motivation for wanting to maintain tslib (evdev should replace it), but if you don't think the package should be removed, you should close the RM bug with an explanation. https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/caktje6htv__gxqyngaskdy4ejubyo9f11ue2y_aow7cmorc...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#754260: RFS: terminology/0.6.0-1 [ITP]
Heya, * Anthony F McInerney afm...@gmail.com [2014-07-30 23:46:03 +0100]: Hi Nicolas The eet file source issues, i ran a 'find' and couldn't see the files your talking about, could you name one or two explicitly for me? The two files I was talking about are: ./src/bin/app_server_eet.c ./src/bin/app_server_eet.h When i mentioned them, the terminology devs seemed to think they were config files. (enlightenment has a thing about putting text into 'machine code' for faster parsing) there are tools like edje_cc edje_decc edje_recc etc Everything else has been taken care of and i have uploaded 0.6.1-2 for you to peruse. The respective dsc file can be found at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/terminology/terminology_0.6.1-2.dsc Please keep the revision at -1 until the package is uploaded to Debian. mentors.d.n will be fine with you reuploading the same version over and over again. I'll take another look later today. Cheers, -- Nicolas Dandrimont BOFH excuse #382: Someone was smoking in the computer room and set off the halon systems. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: tslib RM bug
Hello Paul, thank you for your answer. Am Donnerstag, den 31.07.2014, 12:10 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise: On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: What is the best way to stop this and the blocking bugs? Personally I don't understand your motivation for wanting to maintain tslib (evdev should replace it), but if you don't think the package should be removed, you should close the RM bug with an explanation. [...] Upps. I don't have the info about the replacement. This info and the RM bug are not on the PTS. bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise CU Jörg -- pgp Fingerprint: 7D13 3C60 0A10 DBE1 51F8 EBCB 422B 44B0 BE58 1B6E pgp Key: BE581B6E CAcert Key S/N: 0E:D4:56 Jörg Frings-Fürst D-54526 Niederkail Threema: SYR8SJXB IRC: j_...@freenode.net j_...@oftc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#754260: RFS: terminology/0.6.0-1 [ITP]
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote: * Anthony F McInerney afm...@gmail.com [2014-07-30 23:46:03 +0100]: The eet file source issues, i ran a 'find' and couldn't see the files your talking about, could you name one or two explicitly for me? The two files I was talking about are: ./src/bin/app_server_eet.c ./src/bin/app_server_eet.h I can't find the source for these files in the upstream git repository either. The source should look something like the two files below. Please ask upstream what happened. It might be that they generated the files and then deleted the source and now tweak the .c files instead of the .geneet files. Or it could be that they rewrote these files from scratch, there are versions without _eet in their name. The best way to find out is to ask upstream. https://git.enlightenment.org/apps/terminology.git/tree/src/bin/ https://git.enlightenment.org/tools/geneet.git/tree/history.geneet https://git.enlightenment.org/tools/geneet.git/tree/phonebook.geneet Also, looks like the tool used to create these files isn't in Debian yet. https://git.enlightenment.org/tools/geneet.git/tree/ Also, src/bin/lz4 looks like an embedded code copy. Please ensure that the package uses the system version of the lz4 library and that src/bin/lz4 is removed in debian/rules build before ./configure is run, so that the code copy is never used. For bonus points, convince upstream to remove this directory from their VCS and tarballs. Please note that lz4 recently had some security issues, so terminology might be affected by them, depending on on how it uses lz4. https://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCodeCopies https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/lz4 -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/caktje6gxz4vj1swwh3m2i1s7gej_nt9+0w3wn7qrhkog57c...@mail.gmail.com
Re: tslib RM bug
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: Upps. I don't have the info about the replacement. This info and the RM bug are not on the PTS. The RM bug should be mentioned on the PTS but isn't, that seems like a bug. Since we are transitioning the PTS to the package tracker, the bug won't be fixed on the PTS. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6Fn2mC9OcXs0xF2RPABUhwXgLYUbn2qOK=hucuyjkm...@mail.gmail.com
