Re: Bug#756436: RFS: mytop/1.9.1-2
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:44:49AM +0200, Werner Detter wrote: Hi, Thanks, upload worked. Uploaded to the archive. Thanks. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140731091612.ga4...@timegate.de
Bug#756042: RFS: sandboxgamemaker/2.8.2+dfsg-1 [ITA][RC]
2014-07-30 23:15 GMT-03:00 Anthony F McInerney afm...@gmail.com: Hi Eriberto, Hi! Thank you for taking the time to look over the package. You're welcome. 1 to 5 done. Do you want me to upload a 2.8.2+dfsg-2 with my changes for review? No. You must remove the package in mentors and reupload as dfsg-1. EDIT: dpkg: warning: while removing sandboxgamemaker, directory '/usr/share/sandboxgamemaker' not empty so not removed After removing postrm i got this on apt-get purge. The data installed by postinst is still present on my system. Ok. It's right. The package installs a empty directory. So, dpkg will remove a empty directory only. It is valid for all packages. So, remove postrm because their acts are wrong. If you want check, install a package, add an extra file in a directory and try to purge this package. (in GIT you should put a tag after the upload to Debian only) Noted, i'll remove the tag :-P 6. Check if the content of d/README.source is being fulfilled. As far as i know this is correct, if you can be more explicit about anything i should be checking, or how i should be checking that would be great. (links to relevant documentation are also always welcome) It was a simple request. I didn't read the file. But you are adopting the package and needs check/fix all issues. Note that the package is a monster (is big) and I can ask for other changes in future. A monster it is. Anything you see that needs fixing will get fixed. Thanks! :-D I think you can try (now or in next revision) modernize the package. As an example, you can use the new (reduced) d/rules format. I'd like to, i didn't want to start breaking everything before getting it back into debian though, do you think it's possible to get it uploaded in it's current state and then work to bring it up to date? Yes, no problem. We can upload. But, don't worry. I already converted some packages to new format and all worked fine. The new format is automated and smart. But I will upload as-is if you want it. So, we can test the new format. Cheers, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjfozj_pn02xk6x8vj1ixo1uwe2pusavyemi9wenwdj...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#756634: RFS: roxterm/2.9.1-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm * Package name: roxterm * Version : 2.9.1-1 * Upstream Author : Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk * URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net * License : GPL-2+, LGPL-3+ * Section : x11 It builds those binary packages: roxterm - Multi-tabbed GTK+/VTE terminal emulator - virtual package for GTK3 roxterm-common - Multi-tabbed GTK+/VTE terminal emulator - common files roxterm-gtk2 - Multi-tabbed GTK+/VTE terminal emulator - GTK2 version roxterm-gtk2-dbg - Debugging symbols for GTK2 version of roxterm roxterm-gtk3 - Multi-tabbed GTK+/VTE terminal emulator - GTK3 version roxterm-gtk3-dbg - Debugging symbols for GTK3 version of roxterm To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/roxterm Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/roxterm/roxterm_2.9.1-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload: roxterm (2.9.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * Changed default GTK colour scheme: + Make bold black (LP: #1340721). + Don't set cursor colour due to https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695011. * Add support for launching ssh from matching URIs (based on a patch by Karl E. Jorgensen). * Support popular SCM URIs (copy to clipboard only). * Fixed background transparency support for recent versions of vte. * Don't crash trying to use a copy of an empty profile (Closes: #752253). * Allow Shortcuts files to be reloaded and edited as text. * Override --tab to false if no match for --title. * debian/control: Added Build-Depends on imagemagick, itstool. * debian/copyright: Updated year. * Support XDG AppData spec. * Corrected profile editor page selection when background options are disabled (doesn't affect Debian). * Changed keyboard shortcut for Find Next to avoid clash with New Window. * Fixed wrapping of some dialog labels. * Exclude logo source xcf (gimp) file from installation. * Added GTK VTE version summary to About dialog. -- Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:34:01 +0100 Regards, Tony Houghton -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53da5e9d.8090...@realh.co.uk
Bug#754260: Fwd: terminology uploaded to mentors.debian.net
I've deleted the others and reuploaded as 0.6.1-1 . I think i've fixed everything you listed. Upstream have been pointed at this bug to address the ganeet issue. They should be emailing some info soon. -- Forwarded message -- From: mentors.debian.net supp...@mentors.debian.net Date: 31 July 2014 16:38 Subject: terminology uploaded to mentors.debian.net To: afm...@gmail.com Hi. Your upload of the package 'terminology' to mentors.debian.net was successful. Others can now see it. The URL of your package is: http://mentors.debian.net/package/terminology The respective dsc file can be found at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/terminology/terminology_0.6.1-1.dsc If you do not yet have a sponsor for your package you may want to go to http://mentors.debian.net/sponsors/rfs-howto/terminology and set the Seeking a sponsor option to highlight your package on the welcome page. You can also send an RFS (request for sponsorship) to the debian-mentors mailing list. Your package page will give your suggestions on how to send that mail. Good luck in finding a sponsor! Thanks, -- mentors.debian.net
Bug#756042: RFS: sandboxgamemaker/2.8.2+dfsg-1 [ITA][RC]
hey eriberto, Ok. It's right. The package installs a empty directory. So, dpkg will remove a empty directory only. It is valid for all packages. So, remove postrm because their acts are wrong. If you want check, install a package, add an extra file in a directory and try to purge this package. If we don't use postrm to remove the extra data installed if some chooses to in postinst, do i just put something in the readme, telling them to remove it themselves? and does that mean the postinst needs to change, not to check for the data if it exists and just overwrite it? (in the case of a new version of the package / external data.) Thanks Anthony
Bug#740032: RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0.1-1 [ITP]
tags 740032 moreinfo thanks Hi Gabrielle, Hi want help you (as sponsor). Where I can find the original upstream tarball? Thanks! Regards, Eriberto pgpJ1tys94yku.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#756436: marked as done (RFS: mytop/1.9.1-2)
Your message dated Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:24:40 +
with message-id e1xct9k-0001me...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: mytop/1.9.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #756436,
regarding RFS: mytop/1.9.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
756436: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=756436
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package mytop
* Package name: mytop
Version : 1.9.1-2
Upstream Author : Jeremy D. Zawodny jer...@zawodny.com,
Mark Grennan m...@grennan.com
* URL : http://www.mysqlfanboy.com/mytop/
* License : GPL-2+
Section : utils
It builds those binary packages:
mytop - top like query monitor for MySQL
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/mytop
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mytop/mytop_1.9.1-2.dsc
More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com.
For changes since the last upload see [1]
Cheers,
Werner Detter
[1] debdiff
diff -Nru mytop-1.9.1/debian/changelog mytop-1.9.1/debian/changelog
--- mytop-1.9.1/debian/changelog2013-05-11 17:42:29.0 +0200
+++ mytop-1.9.1/debian/changelog2014-07-29 21:55:26.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+mytop (1.9.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Add 13_fix_scope_for_show_slave_status_data.patch which fixes incorrect
+scope for SHOW SLAVE STATUS data variable (Closes: #756434)
+ * Add 12_fix_spelling_and_allignment.patch which fixes spelling in
+help context and aligment (Closes: #712642, #732852)
+ * Updated standards version to 3.9.5
+ * Fixed wrong weekday in changelog
+
+ -- Werner Detter wer...@aloah-from-hell.de Tue, 29 Jul 2014 20:44:41 +0100
+
mytop (1.9.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release (Closes: #590505, #538164, #565759, #558100,
@@ -28,7 +39,7 @@
* Deleted debian/menu, debian/postrm, debian/postinst, debian/prerm
* Renamed mytop.example to mytop.sample.conf
- -- Werner Detter wer...@aloah-from-hell.de Sat, 13 May 2013 17:41:05 +0100
+ -- Werner Detter wer...@aloah-from-hell.de Mon, 13 May 2013 17:41:05 +0100
mytop (1.6-6) unstable; urgency=low
diff -Nru mytop-1.9.1/debian/control mytop-1.9.1/debian/control
--- mytop-1.9.1/debian/control 2013-05-11 17:39:42.0 +0200
+++ mytop-1.9.1/debian/control 2014-07-29 21:54:51.0 +0200
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
Maintainer: Werner Detter wer...@aloah-from-hell.de
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7)
Homepage: http://www.mysqlfanboy.com/mytop/
-Standards-Version: 3.9.4
+Standards-Version: 3.9.5
Package: mytop
Architecture: all
diff -Nru mytop-1.9.1/debian/patches/12_fix_spelling_and_allignment.patch
mytop-1.9.1/debian/patches/12_fix_spelling_and_allignment.patch
--- mytop-1.9.1/debian/patches/12_fix_spelling_and_allignment.patch
1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ mytop-1.9.1/debian/patches/12_fix_spelling_and_allignment.patch
2014-07-29 20:56:40.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+Description: fix spelling and alignment
+Origin: Olaf van der Spek o...@xwis.net
+Author: Werner Detter wer...@aloah-from-hell.de
+DEP: 3
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/712642
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/732852
+--- a/mytop
b/mytop
+@@ -976,7 +976,7 @@
+ my $q_diff = ( $STATUS{Questions} - $OLD_STATUS{Questions} );
+ # print(q_diff: $STATUS{Questions} - $OLD_STATUS{Questions} /
$t_delta = $q_diff\n);
+
+- printf( Sorts: %5.0f qps now: %4.0f Slow qps: %3.1f Threads:
%4.0f (%4.0f/%4.0f) %02.0f/%02.0f/%02.0f/%02.0f \n,
++ printf( Sorts: %6.0f qps now: %4.0f Slow qps: %3.1f Threads:
%4.0f (%4.0f/%4.0f) %02.0f/%02.0f/%02.0f/%02.0f \n,
+( $STATUS{Sort_rows} - $OLD_STATUS{Sort_rows} ) / $t_delta,
+ ( $STATUS{Questions} - $OLD_STATUS{Questions} ) / $t_delta,
+ ( # slow now (qps)
+@@ -1682,7 +1682,7 @@
+ e - explain the query that a thread is running
+ E - display current replication error
+ f - show full query info for a given thread
+- F - unFilter the dispaly
++ F - unfilter the display
+ h - show only a specifc host's connections
+ H - toggle
Bug#756634: RFS: roxterm/2.9.1-1
tags 756634 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Tony,
Please:
1. Update DH from 7 to 9.
2. Your package doesn't builds twice. To fix it:
- As upstream, remove all po/*.mo when running make clean (or similar).
- Idem for these directories: Help/{es,fr,pt_BR,ru,uk} and
roxterm-config.1.xml, roxterm.1.xml, roxterm.spec.
- Allow the content modification of the po/roxterm.pot. To make it,
create the file debian/source/options with this content[1]:
extend-diff-ignore = ^po/roxterm.pot$
Thanks!
Regards,
Eriberto
[1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dother.en.html#sourceopt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxje36rwgmbnhy5z5jemadbpkfrutpecyt9xnxadkrs7...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#756448: marked as done (RFS: gdal/1.11.0+dfsg1-1~exp3)
Your message dated Thu, 31 Jul 2014 19:22:53 +0200 with message-id 53da7b6d.3080...@xs4all.nl and subject line Re: Bug#756448: RFS: gdal/1.11.0+dfsg1-1~exp3 [uploaded] has caused the Debian Bug report #756448, regarding RFS: gdal/1.11.0+dfsg1-1~exp3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 756448: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=756448 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package gdal Package name: gdal Version : 1.11.0+dfsg1-1~exp3 Upstream Author : The GDAL/OGR project team, Frank Warmerdam warmer...@pobox.com URL : http://www.gdal.org/ License : MIT Section : science It builds those binary packages: libgdal1h- Geospatial Data Abstraction Library libgdal1-dev - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library - Transitional package libgdal-dev - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library - Development files libgdal-doc - Documentation for the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library gdal-bin - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library - Utility programs python-gdal - Python bindings to the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library python3-gdal - Python 3 bindings to the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library libgdal-perl - Perl bindings to the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library libgdal-java - Java bindings to the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library Due to the missing GPG keyring on mentors, the package is not available there. Please build the package from the Debian GIS git repository: debcheckout --git-track='*' gdal git checkout experimental git-buildpackage --git-pbuilder --git-debian-branch=experimental More information about GDAL/OGR can be obtained from http://www.gdal.org/. Changes since the last upload: * Merge changes from 1.10.1+dfsg-7 to include patch by Breno Leitao. Regards, Bas Couwenberg ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 07/29/2014 11:52 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package gdal Package name: gdal Version : 1.11.0+dfsg1-1~exp3 Many thanks to Andreas Tille for sponsoring the upload. -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1---End Message---
Bug#740032: RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0.1-1 [ITP]
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org wrote: Hi want help you (as sponsor). Where I can find the original upstream tarball? debian/watch file and debian/rules get-orig-source should help. http://sourceforge.net/projects/sweethome3d/files/SweetHome3D-textures/Textures-1.0.1/ I already maintain all sweethome3d* packages, under Java team umbrella. DM upload permissions would be appreciate too. Thanks, -- G..e -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cabcawc0iachpejogwzgnhrqe-vd7npm2ar3duihjtvwi35q...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#756447: marked as done (RFS: gdal/1.10.1+dfsg-7)
Your message dated Thu, 31 Jul 2014 19:23:26 +0200 with message-id 53da7b8e.9070...@xs4all.nl and subject line Re: Bug#756447: RFS: gdal/1.10.1+dfsg-7 [uploaded] has caused the Debian Bug report #756447, regarding RFS: gdal/1.10.1+dfsg-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 756447: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=756447 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package gdal Package name: gdal Version : 1.10.1+dfsg-7 Upstream Author : The GDAL/OGR project team, Frank Warmerdam warmer...@pobox.com URL : http://www.gdal.org/ License : MIT Section : science It builds those binary packages: libgdal1h- Geospatial Data Abstraction Library libgdal1-dev - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library - Transitional package libgdal-dev - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library - Development files libgdal-doc - Documentation for the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library gdal-bin - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library - Utility programs python-gdal - Python bindings to the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library python3-gdal - Python 3 bindings to the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library libgdal-perl - Perl bindings to the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library libgdal-java - Java bindings to the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library Due to the missing GPG keyring on mentors, the package is not available there. Please build the package from the Debian GIS git repository: debcheckout --git-track='*' gdal git checkout master git-buildpackage --git-pbuilder More information about GDAL/OGR can be obtained from http://www.gdal.org/. Changes since the last upload: * Also use autotools_dev to update config.sub and config.guess. Thanks to Breno Leitao for the patch. (closes: #756412) Regards, Bas Couwenberg ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 07/29/2014 11:52 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package gdal Package name: gdal Version : 1.10.1+dfsg-7 Many thanks to Andreas Tille for sponsoring the upload. -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1---End Message---
Bug#754260: RFS: terminology/0.6.0-1 [ITP]
Hi pabs, Also, src/bin/lz4 looks like an embedded code copy. Please ensure that the package uses the system version of the lz4 library and that src/bin/lz4 is removed in debian/rules build before ./configure is run, so that the code copy is never used. For bonus points, convince upstream to remove this directory from their VCS and tarballs. Please note that lz4 recently had some security issues, so terminology might be affected by them, depending on on how it uses lz4. if i need to remove src/bin/lz4 folder with debian/rules does that imply that i need to use get-orig-source to repack, and also do i then need to use d/copyright to exclude-files? also if the package requires / builds lz4 do i need to modify the makefile that builds it and do i provide the lz4-dev as a build-depends or . . . just the libs a 'depends' i'll look into packaging the geneet package too, assuming that will be needed. Thanks Anthony (bofh80)
Bug#740032: RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0.1-1 [ITP]
Hum... Not a good reply... I should find the download site in d/copyright header. Do you made a unique tarball from two independent zips? Other question: why your team doesn't sponsored your package? Waiting... Eriberto 2014-07-31 14:39 GMT-03:00 Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com: On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org wrote: Hi want help you (as sponsor). Where I can find the original upstream tarball? debian/watch file and debian/rules get-orig-source should help. http://sourceforge.net/projects/sweethome3d/files/SweetHome3D-textures/Textures-1.0.1/ I already maintain all sweethome3d* packages, under Java team umbrella. DM upload permissions would be appreciate too. Thanks, -- G..e -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjderowy8qi0p09we745rreegv_cd7ziaoxkmz5nhoc...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#740032: RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0.1-1 [ITP]
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Eriberto Mota eribe...@debian.org wrote: Hum... Not a good reply... I should find the download site in d/copyright header. Right, fixed on git http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/sweethome3d-textures.git Do you made a unique tarball from two independent zips? Yes, they are usually released together. s-furniture and s-furniture-nonfree already work this way, by packaging respectively 5 and 3 zipfiles. I don't recall why I didn't do multi-tarball packaging, perhaps at that time it wasn't supported by git-buildpackage? No idea whether it is at the moment. Other question: why your team doesn't sponsored your package? Probably because I didn't ask not to bother them and in this case I wasn't in a hurry at all. Last sweethome3d* uploads had been sponsored by Tony Mancill. Mentors is a good place to get time from people who want to share it. -- G..e -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cabcawc2n+ao_ufwgkv6td8jxavmd40oevi1+yjjyzcdkpjd...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#754202: marked as done (RFS: gamera/3.4.1-1 [RC, ITA] -- document analysis framework)
Your message dated Fri, 01 Aug 2014 00:09:44 +0200 with message-id 53dabea8.3080...@danielstender.com and subject line RFS: gamera/3.4.1-1 [RC, ITA] -- document analysis framework has caused the Debian Bug report #754202, regarding RFS: gamera/3.4.1-1 [RC, ITA] -- document analysis framework to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 754202: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754202 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Hello, I'm seeking for a sponsor for my package of Gamera: https://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gamera.html The Debian patch is community maintained: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-modules/packages/gamera/trunk/ svn://svn.debian.org/python-modules/packages/gamera/trunk I've putted the package up onto Mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/package/gamera http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gamera/gamera_3.4.1-1.dsc Build log: http://www.danielstender.com/buildlogs/gamera_3.4.1-1_amd64.build The package includes a new upstream release, closes a couple of bugs, and prohibits the imminent AUTORM of itself and several dependencies in a couple of days because of the spurious libtiff4-dev b-p of the orphaned predecessor (cf. #736004). Thank you very much, Daniel Stender -- http://www.danielstender.com/blog/ PGP key: 2048R/E41BD2D0 C879 5E41 1ED7 EE80 0F2E 7D0C DBDD 4D96 E41B D2D0 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Uploaded. Thanks everybody. Daniel Stender -- http://www.danielstender.com/blog/ PGP key: 2048R/E41BD2D0 C879 5E41 1ED7 EE80 0F2E 7D0C DBDD 4D96 E41B D2D0---End Message---
Bug#756693: RFS: gdal/1.10.1+dfsg-8
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package gdal Package name: gdal Version : 1.10.1+dfsg-8 Upstream Author : The GDAL/OGR project team, Frank Warmerdam warmer...@pobox.com URL : http://www.gdal.org/ License : MIT Section : science It builds those binary packages: libgdal1h- Geospatial Data Abstraction Library libgdal1-dev - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library - Transitional package libgdal-dev - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library - Development files libgdal-doc - Documentation for the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library gdal-bin - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library - Utility programs python-gdal - Python bindings to the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library python3-gdal - Python 3 bindings to the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library libgdal-perl - Perl bindings to the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library libgdal-java - Java bindings to the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/gdal Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gdal/gdal_1.10.1+dfsg-8.dsc More information about GDAL/OGR can be obtained from http://www.gdal.org/. Changes since the last upload: * Support hdf5 1.8.13 new packaging layout. Thanks to Gilles Filippini for the patch. (closes: #756662) Regards, Bas Couwenberg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140731224712.7699.62735.report...@osiris.linuxminded.xs4all.nl
Bug#756711: RFS: gdal/1.11.0+dfsg1-1~exp4
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package gdal Package name: gdal Version : 1.11.0+dfsg1-1~exp4 Upstream Author : The GDAL/OGR project team, Frank Warmerdam warmer...@pobox.com URL : http://www.gdal.org/ License : MIT Section : science It builds those binary packages: libgdal1h- Geospatial Data Abstraction Library libgdal1-dev - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library - Transitional package libgdal-dev - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library - Development files libgdal-doc - Documentation for the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library gdal-bin - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library - Utility programs python-gdal - Python bindings to the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library python3-gdal - Python 3 bindings to the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library libgdal-perl - Perl bindings to the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library libgdal-java - Java bindings to the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/gdal Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gdal/gdal_1.11.0+dfsg1-1~exp4.dsc More information about GDAL/OGR can be obtained from http://www.gdal.org/. Changes since the last upload: * Merge changes from 1.10.1+dfsg-8 to support new hdf5 packaging layout. Regards, Bas Couwenberg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140731235912.18423.57015.report...@osiris.linuxminded.xs4all.nl
Bug#740032: RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0.1-1 [ITP]
2014-07-31 16:16 GMT-03:00 Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com: Do you made a unique tarball from two independent zips? Yes, they are usually released together. s-furniture and s-furniture-nonfree already work this way, by packaging respectively 5 and 3 zipfiles. I don't recall why I didn't do multi-tarball packaging, perhaps at that time it wasn't supported by git-buildpackage? No idea whether it is at the moment. Ok. I can review your work and be a sponsor if you package individually each zip. Other question: why your team doesn't sponsored your package? Probably because I didn't ask not to bother them and in this case I wasn't in a hurry at all. Last sweethome3d* uploads had been sponsored by Tony Mancill. Mentors is a good place to get time from people who want to share it. That is strange. But there a logical. Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjc7wt65uugwcmm_x7idv1odwncf7wo4jb5stwx-rrr...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#754260: RFS: terminology/0.6.0-1 [ITP]
On Thu, 2014-07-31 at 19:16 +0100, Anthony F McInerney wrote: if i need to remove src/bin/lz4 folder with debian/rules does that imply that i need to use get-orig-source to repack, and also do i then need to use d/copyright to exclude-files? You should not need to repack the orig.tar.gz, just ensure that these files are removed during the build before ./configure is run (override dh_auto_configure). If you really want to remove them from the orig.tar.gz, yes use the uscan support for repacking the orig.tar.gz. also if the package requires / builds lz4 do i need to modify the makefile that builds it and do i provide the lz4-dev as a build-depends or . . . just the libs a 'depends' Add liblz4-dev to the Build-Depends. In addition you will need to patch src/bin/Makefile.am and src/bin/termptysave.c so that the system version is used. Since you are patching the autotools build system you will need to replace autotools-dev with dh-autoreconf in the Build-Depends and replace autotools-dev with autoreconf in debian/rules. i'll look into packaging the geneet package too, assuming that will be needed. Great, thanks. With compat level 9 you do not need /usr/share/dpkg/default.mk in the debian/rules file AFAIK. The pkg-e team could definitely use help, please get involved if you haven't already and have the time to do so. https://wiki.debian.org/PkgE -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
