Bug#766982: RFS: plowshare4/1.0.6-1
Control: tags -1 -pending Hi Eriberto, I've addressed some of the feedback from Paul above in a new upload to mentors. I will address the remainder when I work on packaging the next upstream release, since none of the suggested changes are pressing. Could you please consider uploading my package to experimental? plowshare4 (1.0.6-1) experimental; urgency=medium * New upstream release. * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6, no changes. * Point Vcs-Git field to the correct branch. * Improve the derivation of the version string from git. * Update list of supported modules. * Remove Depends: bash (bash =4.1 is present and essential in debian). * Add watch file using fakeupstream.cgi script. * spelling_comments.patch: corrects typos in comments * spelling_helpfull_flag.patch: corrects typo in CLI option. * utf8.patch: repairs an encoding issue. * Add upstream metadata. Cheers, Carl signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Bug#771774: RFS: libmongo-client/0.1.8-2 [ITA]
Hello Gergely, Am Freitag, den 05.12.2014, 08:43 +0100 schrieb Gergely Nagy: Jörg == Jörg Frings-Fürst deb...@jff-webhosting.net writes: [...] The updated package looks fine, good job! One thing you may wish to change is the Source: stanza in debian/copyright. While I intend to restore the git URL there (I just need to reinstall cgit), it currently doesn't work, and github is the canonical one nowadays. I don't have seen it :(. Changed and uploaded again. CU Jörg -- New: GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB 30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D GPG Key: 8CA1D25D CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56 Old (will be revoked after 2014-12-31): pgp Fingerprint: 7D13 3C60 0A10 DBE1 51F8 EBCB 422B 44B0 BE58 1B6E pgp Key: BE581B6E Jörg Frings-Fürst D-54526 Niederkail Threema: SYR8SJXB IRC: j_...@freenode.net j_...@oftc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#772230: RFS: routino/2.7.2-3
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package routino Package name: routino Version : 2.7.2-3 Upstream Author : Andrew M. Bishop a...@gedanken.demon.co.uk URL : http://www.routino.org/ License : AGPL-3+ Section : misc It builds those binary packages: routino - Set of tools to find a path between two points routino-www - Web frontend for routino To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/routino Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/routino/routino_2.7.2-3.dsc More information about routino can be obtained from http://www.routino.org/. Changes since the last upload: * Team upload. * Restructure control file with cme. * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6, no changes. * Use canonical Vcs-* URLs. * Add patch to use hardening build flags. * Remove period from package description. Regards, Sebastiaan Couwenberg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141206112600.1931.93929.report...@osiris.linuxminded.xs4all.nl
Bug#768878: RFS: sfarklib/0.20131219gitee08d0c-1 [ITP]
Hi Ross and Felipe, Thanks for the quick response, and thanks for taking a look at the packages! I appreciate that Felipe may perhaps get some time one day to help us out (and hopefully give Ross some DM rights on the packages after that !) I have now done the improvements suggested by Ross: - Ran cme fix dpkg-control on both packages - Fixed description of libsfark-dev (there was a copy-and-paste error) - Added get-orig-source target on both packages The new versions have been uploaded to mentors and checked into the Vcs. It's probably useful if Ross takes a look at the packages once again to check that I haven't made some new mistakes before Felipe helps out with the upload. Having to wait a few weeks more before the upload is done, is no big issue, but it would be nice if Felipe informs us if he doesn't get time at all to do itl :) (Btw Ross: Congratulations a lot with your new DM status! :D) Best regards, Ruben 2014-12-05 17:31 GMT+01:00 Ruben Undheim ruben.undh...@gmail.com: Hi everyone in the multimedia team, This new package and its counterpart (sfarkxtc) have been laying around in the sponsorship-request queue approximately one month. Is there any DD in the team who now is eager to help with some sponsoring? The two packages are also available on mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/package/sfarklib http://mentors.debian.net/package/sfarkxtc We are two co-uploaders and the packages are team-maintained. Thank you very much in advance, Regards, Ruben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/ca+chnyx_lv1qjd2thhbvbuamb9ntcmyen9pfjan58eq_7be...@mail.gmail.com
Re: FTBFS on powerpc/ppc64el
Hi Everyone! I'm back working on this problem again... On 20/10/14 11:55, Etienne Millon wrote: * Daniel Lintott dan...@serverb.co.uk [141020 12:38]: Okay.. that points me in the direction of the the common/dynamips_common.h line 83 [1]. #ifndef _unused /* Function that is never used */ #define _unused __attribute__((unused)) #endif Any ideas on where to go from here? Hi, I think that you can patch utils.h (and possibly other dynamips headers) so that it includes dynamips_common.h only after loading system includes (not tested). That way _unused will be undefined at the time sigcontext.h is included. So I have moved all the dynamips_common.h includes to after the system includes and got a lot further but have hit the error again later on in the build :( commit b4daab223d4d3d35075cd7d5290bb5e72f99b522 Author: Daniel Lintott dan...@serverb.co.uk Date: Mon Oct 27 17:31:44 2014 + Import dynamips_common.h after importing system headers :100644 100644 fd06b39... 466ff40... M common/dev_vtty.c :100644 100644 090e772... 1640b73... M common/net.h :100644 100644 7b52845... ef04385... M common/net_io.c :100644 100644 20a3645... 732bd78... M common/utils.c :100644 100644 86309b9... 006bad6... M stable/hypervisor.c :100644 100644 4e5a8b0... 9f4a294... M stable/utils.h :100644 100644 10ecfbb... 9447cb0... M unstable/hypervisor.c :100644 100644 9305935... 4109169... M unstable/utils.h And the build error I now hit: In file included from /usr/include/powerpc-linux-gnu/bits/sigcontext.h:28:0, from /usr/include/signal.h:339, from /home/daniel/workspace/dynamips/stable/utils.h:11, from /home/daniel/workspace/dynamips/common/dev_vtty.c:29: /usr/include/powerpc-linux-gnu/asm/sigcontext.h:17:23: error: expected identifier or ‘(’ before ‘[’ token (Though it is also quite bad that _unused is in global scope in the first place IMHO.) Can anyone elaborate on this? I understand the what is being said here, but my C skills aren't at that level! Can the scope be changed, so it's not in the global scope... or would it be a matter of choosing a different name for that definition. Cheers Daniel signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Bug#771774: RFS: libmongo-client/0.1.8-2 [ITA]
On 2014-12-05 08:43, Gergely Nagy wrote: Jörg == Jörg Frings-Fürst deb...@jff-webhosting.net writes: * Why move --dbg-package from DH_OPTIONS to an override? Jörg --dbg-package is only needed in dh_strip[1]. Yes. But it works fine in DH_OPTIONS too, without any ill side-effects, and is shorter there. (Personal thing, but I hate overrides, and if there's another way to do what I want, which isn't convoluted, I'd choose that) But override or DH_OPTIONS, in this case, doesn't matter. The reason I prefer the override, even though it is longer, it that it clearly limits the scope of the option I'm setting. This is helpful to contributors to the package, or new maintainers. `man dh_strip` gives them all the info they need. The effects of DH_OPTIONS=--dbg-package might be obvious to an experienced packager but a newcomer might not know that it only affects dh_strip, hence instead of `man dh_strip`, an internet search or IRC inquiry is required. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54831b29.3070...@kvr.at
Re: FTBFS on powerpc/ppc64el
On 06/12/14 13:43, Daniel Lintott wrote: Hi Everyone! I'm back working on this problem again... [...] (Though it is also quite bad that _unused is in global scope in the first place IMHO.) Can anyone elaborate on this? I understand the what is being said here, but my C skills aren't at that level! Can the scope be changed, so it's not in the global scope... or would it be a matter of choosing a different name for that definition. Okay after some trial and error, I have found the solution. I have renamed the re-definition of _unused to _Unused. The build now passes successfully! :) Regards, Daniel signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#772130: marked as done (RFS: gamera/3.4.1+svn1423-3 [RC] -- document analysis framework)
Your message dated Sat, 6 Dec 2014 23:03:00 +0100 with message-id 20141206220300.gs7...@jadzia.comodo.priv.at and subject line Re: Bug#772130: RFS: gamera/3.4.1+svn1423-3 [RC] -- document analysis framework has caused the Debian Bug report #772130, regarding RFS: gamera/3.4.1+svn1423-3 [RC] -- document analysis framework to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 772130: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=772130 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Hello, I'm looking for a uploader of my latest package of Gamera, on AUTORM for 2014-12-22. It fixes the RC serious bugs 766740 and 770646 (FTBFS on arm64). I've pretested on a local Qemu setup and it appears to build fine on that architecture, but that's a package for experimental to test it again before uploading into Sid. Buildlog: http://www.danielstender.com/buildlogs/gamera_3.4.1+svn1423-3_amd64.build Mentors upload: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gamera/gamera_3.4.1+svn1423-3.dsc Debdiff attached. Thank you very much for consideration. Daniel Stender -- http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian%40danielstender.com GPG key: 4096R/DF5182C8 46CB 1CA8 9EA3 B743 7676 1DB9 15E0 9AF4 DF51 82C8 diff -Nru gamera-3.4.1+svn1423/debian/changelog gamera-3.4.1+svn1423/debian/changelog --- gamera-3.4.1+svn1423/debian/changelog 2014-11-12 10:01:41.0 +0100 +++ gamera-3.4.1+svn1423/debian/changelog 2014-11-20 13:54:54.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +gamera (3.4.1+svn1423-3) experimental; urgency=medium + + * Build dbg on arm64 with different optimization (Closes: #766740). + * Some patches toggled forwarded. + + -- Daniel Stender deb...@danielstender.com Thu, 20 Nov 2014 13:54:10 +0100 + gamera (3.4.1+svn1423-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Added gendoc-version-parsing.diff (Closes: #767158). diff -Nru gamera-3.4.1+svn1423/debian/patches/avoid_mktemp.diff gamera-3.4.1+svn1423/debian/patches/avoid_mktemp.diff --- gamera-3.4.1+svn1423/debian/patches/avoid_mktemp.diff 2014-07-09 01:49:56.0 +0200 +++ gamera-3.4.1+svn1423/debian/patches/avoid_mktemp.diff 2014-11-13 11:10:26.0 +0100 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Description: Fixed security hole because of usage of tmpfile.mktemp() -Bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737324 -Forwarded: no +Bug: http://bugs.debian.org/737324 +Forwarded: yes Author: Daniel Stender deb...@danielstender.com Last-Update: 2014-07-09 --- a/gamera/io.py diff -Nru gamera-3.4.1+svn1423/debian/patches/gendoc-use-wxversion.diff gamera-3.4.1+svn1423/debian/patches/gendoc-use-wxversion.diff --- gamera-3.4.1+svn1423/debian/patches/gendoc-use-wxversion.diff 2014-08-06 13:25:21.0 +0200 +++ gamera-3.4.1+svn1423/debian/patches/gendoc-use-wxversion.diff 2014-11-13 11:10:26.0 +0100 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Make the documentation generator prefer wxPython 2.8 over other versions. This patch is intended to alleviate Debian bug #451104. Author: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org -Forwarded: not-needed +Forwarded: yes Reviewed-by: Daniel Stender deb...@danielstender.com Last-Update: 2014-08-06 diff -Nru gamera-3.4.1+svn1423/debian/patches/gendoc-version-parsing.diff gamera-3.4.1+svn1423/debian/patches/gendoc-version-parsing.diff --- gamera-3.4.1+svn1423/debian/patches/gendoc-version-parsing.diff 2014-11-12 10:01:19.0 +0100 +++ gamera-3.4.1+svn1423/debian/patches/gendoc-version-parsing.diff 2014-11-13 11:10:26.0 +0100 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ but fulfills what's needed here Author: Daniel Stender deb...@danielstender.com Bug: http://bugs.debian.org/767158 -Forwarded: no +Forwarded: yes Last-Update: 2014-10-29 --- a/gamera/gendoc.py diff -Nru gamera-3.4.1+svn1423/debian/patches/suppress-wxdebug-assertion-messages.diff gamera-3.4.1+svn1423/debian/patches/suppress-wxdebug-assertion-messages.diff --- gamera-3.4.1+svn1423/debian/patches/suppress-wxdebug-assertion-messages.diff 2014-09-05 15:30:41.0 +0200 +++ gamera-3.4.1+svn1423/debian/patches/suppress-wxdebug-assertion-messages.diff 2014-11-13 11:10:26.0 +0100 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ on exit Author: Daniel Stender deb...@danielstender.com Bug: http://bugs.debian.org/758578 -Forwarded: no-needed +Forwarded: yes Last-Update: 2014-08-26 --- a/gamera/gui/gui.py diff -Nru gamera-3.4.1+svn1423/debian/patches/wxpython3.0-transition.diff gamera-3.4.1+svn1423/debian/patches/wxpython3.0-transition.diff --- gamera-3.4.1+svn1423/debian/patches/wxpython3.0-transition.diff 2014-08-26 10:04:33.0 +0200 +++
Bug#771373: Non-free ?
Hi Johan, the changelog says targeting non-free but d/control has Section: python instead of Section: non-free/python Please clarify and ping me once both are consistent. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141206221316.ga22...@an3as.eu
Bug#771013: marked as done (RFS: proj-rdnap/2008-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Sun, 07 Dec 2014 04:26:19 + with message-id e1xxtqj-00050i...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: proj-rdnap/2008-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #771013, regarding RFS: proj-rdnap/2008-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 771013: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=771013 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package proj-rdnap Package name: proj-rdnap Version : 2008-1 Upstream Author : RDNAP URL : https://www.kadaster.nl/web/Themas/Registraties/Rijksdriehoeksmeting/Transformatie-van-coordinaten.htm License : RDNAPTRANS2008-NTv2 Section : non-free/science It builds those binary packages: proj-rdnap - RDNAP grid correction files for PROJ.4 To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/proj-rdnap Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/p/proj-rdnap/proj-rdnap_2008-1.dsc More information about RD/NAP can be obtained from https://www.kadaster.nl/web/Themas/Registraties/Rijksdriehoeksmeting/Transformatie-van-coordinaten.htm. Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: #771012) Regards, Bas Couwenberg ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package proj-rdnap has been removed from mentors.---End Message---
Bug#771347: marked as done (RFS: prepair/0.7-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Sun, 07 Dec 2014 04:26:14 + with message-id e1xxtqe-0004zs...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: prepair/0.7-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #771347, regarding RFS: prepair/0.7-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 771347: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=771347 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package prepair Package name: prepair Version : 0.7-1 Upstream Author : Ken Arroyo Ohori g.a.k.arroyooh...@tudelft.nl Hugo Ledoux h.led...@tudelft.nl Martijn Meijers b.m.meij...@tudelft.nl URL : https://github.com/tudelft3d/prepair License : GPL-3.0+ or Commercial Section : science It builds those binary packages: prepair - polygon repair tool prepair-data - polygon repair tool -- example data To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/prepair Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/prepair/prepair_0.7-1.dsc More information about prepair can be obtained from https://github.com/tudelft3d/prepair. Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: #750725) Regards, Bas Couwenberg ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package prepair has been removed from mentors.---End Message---
Bug#769445: marked as done (RFS: berkeley-abc/1.01+20141105hg5b5af75+dfsg-1)
Your message dated Sun, 07 Dec 2014 04:26:16 + with message-id e1xxtqg-0004zc...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: berkeley-abc/1.01+20141105hg5b5af75+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #769445, regarding RFS: berkeley-abc/1.01+20141105hg5b5af75+dfsg-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 769445: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=769445 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package berkeley-abc * Package name: berkeley-abc Version : 1.01+20141105hg5b5af75+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Berkeley Logic Synthesis and Verification Group * URL : http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~alanmi/abc/ * License : Berkeley (MIT-similar license) Section : electronics It builds those binary packages: berkeley-abc - ABC - A System for Sequential Synthesis and Verification The packaging can be checked out with git from here: git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-science/packages/berkeley-abc.git Changes since the last upload: New upstream version Regards, Ruben Undheim ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package berkeley-abc has been removed from mentors.---End Message---
Bug#771346: marked as done (RFS: pprepair/0.0~20140611-c70373b-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Sun, 07 Dec 2014 04:26:20 + with message-id e1xxtqk-00050p...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: pprepair/0.0~20140611-c70373b-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #771346, regarding RFS: pprepair/0.0~20140611-c70373b-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 771346: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=771346 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package pprepair Package name: pprepair Version : 0.0~20140611-c70373b-1 Upstream Author : Ken Arroyo Ohori g.a.k.arroyooh...@tudelft.nl Hugo Ledoux h.led...@tudelft.nl Martijn Meijers b.m.meij...@tudelft.nl URL : https://github.com/tudelft3d/pprepair License : GPL-3.0+ or Commercial Section : science It builds those binary packages: pprepair - planar partition repair tool To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/pprepair Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pprepair/pprepair_0.0~20140611-c70373b-1.dsc More information about pprepair can be obtained from https://github.com/tudelft3d/pprepair. Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: #770649) Regards, Bas Couwenberg ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package pprepair has been removed from mentors.---End Message---
Bug#767137: marked as done (RFS: bsdowl/2.2.2-1 ITP)
Your message dated Sun, 7 Dec 2014 07:00:20 + with message-id 20141207070020.gc23...@master.debian.org and subject line RFS: bsdowl has caused the Debian Bug report #767137, regarding RFS: bsdowl/2.2.2-1 ITP to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 767137: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767137 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package bsdowl. Package name: bsdowl Version : 2.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Michael Grünewald michip...@gmail.com URL : https://github.com/michipili/bsdowl License : CeCILL-B Section : devel It builds those binary packages: bsdowl - Highly portable build system targeting modern UNIX systems This collection of BSD Make directives aims at providing a highly portable build system targetting modern UNIX systems and supporting common or less command languages. It can already be used to: - Preparation and publication of TeX documents; - Development of TeX macros with NOWEB; - Development of OCaml software; - Maintainance of a FreeBSD workstation configuration files; - Preparation of a static website with ONSGMLS. It is well tested under: - Mac OS X, version 10.6.8 and above - FreeBSD, version 9.0 and above - Debian Jessie and newer To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/bsdowl Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bsdowl/bsdowl_2.2.1-1.dsc More information about bsdowl can be obtained from https://github.com/michipili/bsdowl -- Regards, Michael Grünewald ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- This package is in the NEW queue now, so there is currently nothing to be sponsored. https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html---End Message---
Bug#770636: marked as done (RFS: gitinspector/0.3.2+dfsg-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Sun, 7 Dec 2014 07:06:35 + with message-id 20141207070635.ge23...@master.debian.org and subject line RFS for package in NEW has caused the Debian Bug report #770636, regarding RFS: gitinspector/0.3.2+dfsg-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 770636: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770636 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Control: block 768508 by -1 Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for my package gitinspector. * Package name: gitinspector Version : 0.3.2+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Ejwa Software gitinspec...@ejwa.se * URL : http://code.google.com/p/gitinspector/ * License : GPL-3+ Section : vcs It builds the following binary packages: gitinspector - statistical analysis tool for git repositories To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/gitinspector Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gitinspector/gitinspector_0.3.2+dfsg-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Initial release. Closes: #768508 I'm already a DM, if that helps. Regards, Christian Kastner ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- The package is in NEW so there's currently nothing to sponsor. https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html---End Message---
Bug#770638: marked as done (RFS: python-cachetools/0.7.0-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Sun, 7 Dec 2014 07:06:35 + with message-id 20141207070635.ge23...@master.debian.org and subject line RFS for package in NEW has caused the Debian Bug report #770638, regarding RFS: python-cachetools/0.7.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 770638: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770638 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Control: block 767298 by -1 Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-cachetools. * Package name: python-cachetools Version : 0.7.0-1 Upstream Author : Thomas Kremmer * URL : https://github.com/tkem/cachetools * License : Expat Section : python It builds the following binary packages: python-cachetools - extensible memoizing collections and decorators for Python python3-cachetools - extensible memoizing collections and decorators for Python 3 To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-cachetools Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-cachetools/python-cachetools_0.7.0-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Initial release. Closes: #767298 I'm already a DM, if that helps. Regards, Christian Kastner ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- The package is in NEW so there's currently nothing to sponsor. https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html---End Message---
