Re: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique
Hi Helge, On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 03:59:31PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: For goobox, the list of improper paragraph starts with: (paragraph at line 25) (paragraph at line 66) (paragraph at line 84) (paragraph at line 102) (paragraph at line 128) (paragraph at line 171) (paragraph at line 185) (paragraph at line 201) (paragraph at line 217) Looking at debian/copyright yields: 25: second use of GPL-2+ 66: Before third use of GPL-2+ 84: Before fourth use of GPL-2+ 102: Before fith use of GPL-2+ I attached my complete debian/copyright. Thanks for any pointers, ideas, mistakes. You don't need to duplicate the License text multiple times. You can simply specify the License field for the files covered by the license in question. For example: Files: debian/* Copyright: 2013-2014, Daniel Lintott dan...@serverb.co.uk License: GPL-2.0+ Then specify the license text seperately. License: GPL-2.0+ This package is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. [SNIP] Hope that helps, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150303151813.ga6...@mail.serverb.co.uk
dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique
Hello, I recently got lots of errors for the debian/copyright files of my two packages using the machine style copyright. The expanded version states This paragraph define an already defined license., however the paragraphs I checked only use GPL-2+. I read the specification and looked at the examples, however, I could not find my mistake. For goobox, the list of improper paragraph starts with: (paragraph at line 25) (paragraph at line 66) (paragraph at line 84) (paragraph at line 102) (paragraph at line 128) (paragraph at line 171) (paragraph at line 185) (paragraph at line 201) (paragraph at line 217) Looking at debian/copyright yields: 25: second use of GPL-2+ 66: Before third use of GPL-2+ 84: Before fourth use of GPL-2+ 102: Before fith use of GPL-2+ I attached my complete debian/copyright. Thanks for any pointers, ideas, mistakes. Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ Format: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ Upstream-Name: goobox Upstream-Contact: Paolo Bacchilega pao...@src.gnome.org Paolo Bacchilega pao...@svn.gnome.org Paolo Bacchilega pao...@cvs.gnome.org Source: http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/goobox/ Files: * Copyright: 2004-2015 Paolo Bacchilega pao...@src.gnome.org License: GPL-2+ This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. . This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. . On Debian systems, the full text of the GNU General Public License version 2 can be found in the file /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2 Files: configure.ac Copyright: 2009-2015 Paolo Bacchilega pao...@src.gnome.org 2012 György Balló ball...@freestart.hu License: GPL-2+ This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. . This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. . On Debian systems, the full text of the GNU General Public License version 2 can be found in the file /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2 Files: COPYING Copyright: 1989,1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc. 2004 Paolo Bacchilega pao...@src.gnome.org 2014 Tadej Janež tadej.ja...@tadej.hicsalta.si License: RESTRICTED Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed. Files: git.mk Copyright: 2009,2011 Paolo Bacchilega pao...@src.gnome.org 2009 Red Hat Inc. 2009 Behdad Esfahbod License: FREECOPY Copying and distribution of this file, with or without modification, are permitted in any medium without royalty provided the copyright notice and this notice are preserved. Files: INSTALL Copyright: 1994-1996,1999-2002,2004-2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. 2004,2005,2009 Paolo Bacchilega pao...@src.gnome.org License: FREEDOC This file is free documentation; the Free Software Foundation gives unlimited permission to copy, distribute and modify it. Files: Makefile.am Copyright: 2004,2005,2007,2009,2012,2014 Paolo Bacchilega pao...@src.gnome.org 2005 Tommi Vainikainen License: GPL-2+ This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. . This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. . On Debian systems, the full text of the GNU General Public License version 2 can be found in the file /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2 Files: goobox.doap Copyright: 2010,2013 Paolo Bacchilega pao...@src.gnome.org 2014 Piotr Dr◈g piotrd...@gmail.com License: GPL-2+ This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
Re: RFS: cl-launch (updated package)
Dear Debian Mentors and Debian Lispers, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.1.1-1 of my package cl-launch. It builds these binary packages: cl-launch - uniform frontend to running Common Lisp code from the shell The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-launch - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-launch/cl-launch_4.1.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •ReflectionCybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org Reason wins in the long run, because irrational memes fight each other, whereas rational memes add up. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAN7nBXe3U_v4RssWWb+wJgkXq98QN+4n+_usLtH-=pjhv3r...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Python logo license
Quoting Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org: On Feb 28, 2015, at 04:37 PM, Daniel Stender wrote: 1) what would be the proper license for that file in deb/copyright? IANAL but the PSF's policy on use of its trademarks is clearly stated here: https://www.python.org/psf/trademarks/ They are also fairly permissive in granting approval for its legitimate use, if you ask. If it makes a difference in this case, please do ask the PSF. But please mind DFSG §8. Cheers, -Barry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150303102229.horde.eq2elj8bon0eegy6etjq...@isengard.geekcommandos.com
Re: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique
Hello Daniel, On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 03:18:13PM +, Daniel Lintott wrote: On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 03:59:31PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: For goobox, the list of improper paragraph starts with: (paragraph at line 25) (paragraph at line 66) (paragraph at line 84) Looking at debian/copyright yields: 25: second use of GPL-2+ 66: Before third use of GPL-2+ 84: Before fourth use of GPL-2+ Thanks for any pointers, ideas, mistakes. You don't need to duplicate the License text multiple times. Thanks, this makes the file much shorter. I just wonder why lintian does not accept the longer form (which, by my reading, is allowed as well). You can simply specify the License field for the files covered by the license in question. For example: Files: debian/* Copyright: 2013-2014, Daniel Lintott dan...@serverb.co.uk License: GPL-2.0+ Then specify the license text seperately. License: GPL-2.0+ This package is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. [SNIP] I'll see what lintian (the online version) says to the shorter debian/copyright and maybe file a bug for the license specification (which allows both forms). Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#779667: RFS: node-bluebird/2.9.13+dfsg-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package node-bluebird * Package name: node-bluebird Version : 2.9.13+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Petka Antonov petka.anto...@gmail.com * URL : https://github.com/petkaantonov/bluebird * License : Expat Section : web It builds these binary packages: libjs-bluebird - Fully featured Promises/A+ implementation - javascript node-bluebird - Fully featured Promises/A+ implementation - Nodejs To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/node-bluebird Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-bluebird/node- bluebird_2.9.13+dfsg-1.dsc The packaging can be found here: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-bluebird.git Changes since the last upload: [ Ross Gammon ] * Initial release (Closes: #779305) * Repack tarball to exclude minified javascript without source * Document repacking of tarball in d/README.source * Add a libjs-bluebird package for the browser js files * Fix duplicate package descriptions * Remove async.js and use packaged version instead [ Bas Couwenberg ] * Restructure control file with cme. * Add myself to Uploaders. * Update Vcs-Browser URL to use cgit instead of gitweb. Regards, Ross Gammon -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers trusty-security APT policy: (990, 'trusty-security'), (900, 'trusty-updates'), (500, 'trusty'), (400, 'trusty-proposed'), (200, 'utopic-proposed'), (100, 'trusty-backports') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.13.0-46-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150303200115.22179.76326.reportbug@localhost
Bug#779667: RFS: node-bluebird/2.9.13+dfsg-1 [ITP]
Hi Ross, Thanks for your work on the bluebird packaging! On 03/03/2015 09:01 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: * Fix duplicate package descriptions You may want to tweak these a bit to be more in line with other node-* and libjs-* packages. See for example node-q: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-q.git/tree/debian/control And also what npm2deb generates. I pushed a change with my suggested improvement. * Remove async.js and use packaged version instead This looks a lintian false positive, the async.js in bluebird is quite different from the node-async one. Compare: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-async.git/tree/lib/async.js http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-bluebird.git/tree/src/async.js I think reverting this change and adding a lintian override instead is a better idea. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54f61a85.9070...@xs4all.nl
Re: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique
Le Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 03:59:31PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann a écrit : Hello, I recently got lots of errors for the debian/copyright files of my two packages using the machine style copyright. The expanded version states This paragraph define an already defined license., however the paragraphs I checked only use GPL-2+. Hello Helge, I think that the lintian tag is either too strict or too severe, given that the machine-readable format permits to repeat the long description in multiple Files paragraphs. I opened https://bugs.debian.org/779676 about this. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150303222139.ga14...@falafel.plessy.net
Bug#779667: RFS: node-bluebird/2.9.13+dfsg-1 [ITP]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 03/04/2015 07:53 AM, Ross Gammon wrote: On 03/03/2015 09:33 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: * Remove async.js and use packaged version instead This looks a lintian false positive, the async.js in bluebird is quite different from the node-async one. Compare: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-async.git/tree/lib/async.js http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-bluebird.git/tree/src/async.js I think reverting this change and adding a lintian override instead is a better idea. Whoops - I should of checked that. I was in a hurry to finish - that is never a good thing. I have a few family commitments tonight, but after that I will fix. There is no hurry getting the the openlayers dependency tree packaged, there is a lot of work to do which will take quite some time and that's not a problem. Remember: Good things come to those who wait. :-) Kind Regards, Bas - -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJU9rAVAAoJEGdQ8QrojUrx5PIQAK8ZtMnv24NhhSBc6EuG63TI ckEUJkdAi+8mBCNH/W2YS8mgs2p4KOSx5OCMl/fAHidEd4NRPGxbzxY0D7dxLVGr e3zLhl2XpKfTXxB8lXyjCFhbrt3y+BNdRH8JJKt0WfGrz3lkp9XtI0L9B/vbZ/uZ vNXVNeQUPcz1xZcAJlVv8LOnqnsj9pj/5sqSKsd2z4bcyh4dhxUjhuqDhjErzJS4 eqAzMJPzl6FavdU+pbGyeGGxpCGjyK9zte3VW1E1xgd30OKoTRbzV+LkmY2s02qG lj9rcgf+PTYE391CETDTzpVg5t/RfnoAc7O/YIORfVFehor3aUDVOdiXz0HhN6B6 KTsd/WNO/JzAbNvpkGIrTzuXz0AOz8At6Cnz8BEm8v1hcWaoHyRPdO8fGbNvD8Tl yejmCAUDsbbZfPQzZ21Di9lRalD02mKSqS37d0X7xnJPvNRrKBQYwuB3v51Cnjey EOzA/QMCv6JXv/29YooR6L2WnwuhIADy4CXBgZyo2MIQkzwBoAfUB1VIDNmkm53V 0DkgnQIZ5R3mKPrRHSFJzNPRAEyaa0halFYWlGk5LqK0d7xBRGWM/BdMll3mH4hP 0AsOy0cwL54tvGABfAm7C/xK2MgV6yudDMJkXORWv1oG0v5HEX0zF7L+bv7zK8ch 91LPdA2FU3j7rKIlNS/2 =adMa -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54f6b015.9000...@xs4all.nl
Bug#779667: RFS: node-bluebird/2.9.13+dfsg-1 [ITP]
On 2015-03-04 02:11, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 03/04/2015 07:53 AM, Ross Gammon wrote: On 03/03/2015 09:33 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: * Remove async.js and use packaged version instead This looks a lintian false positive, the async.js in bluebird is quite different from the node-async one. Compare: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-async.git/tree/lib/async.js http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-bluebird.git/tree/src/async.js I think reverting this change and adding a lintian override instead is a better idea. Whoops - I should of checked that. I was in a hurry to finish - that is never a good thing. I have a few family commitments tonight, but after that I will fix. There is no hurry getting the the openlayers dependency tree packaged, there is a lot of work to do which will take quite some time and that's not a problem. Remember: Good things come to those who wait. :-) Kind Regards, Bas - -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJU9rAVAAoJEGdQ8QrojUrx5PIQAK8ZtMnv24NhhSBc6EuG63TI ckEUJkdAi+8mBCNH/W2YS8mgs2p4KOSx5OCMl/fAHidEd4NRPGxbzxY0D7dxLVGr e3zLhl2XpKfTXxB8lXyjCFhbrt3y+BNdRH8JJKt0WfGrz3lkp9XtI0L9B/vbZ/uZ vNXVNeQUPcz1xZcAJlVv8LOnqnsj9pj/5sqSKsd2z4bcyh4dhxUjhuqDhjErzJS4 eqAzMJPzl6FavdU+pbGyeGGxpCGjyK9zte3VW1E1xgd30OKoTRbzV+LkmY2s02qG lj9rcgf+PTYE391CETDTzpVg5t/RfnoAc7O/YIORfVFehor3aUDVOdiXz0HhN6B6 KTsd/WNO/JzAbNvpkGIrTzuXz0AOz8At6Cnz8BEm8v1hcWaoHyRPdO8fGbNvD8Tl yejmCAUDsbbZfPQzZ21Di9lRalD02mKSqS37d0X7xnJPvNRrKBQYwuB3v51Cnjey EOzA/QMCv6JXv/29YooR6L2WnwuhIADy4CXBgZyo2MIQkzwBoAfUB1VIDNmkm53V 0DkgnQIZ5R3mKPrRHSFJzNPRAEyaa0halFYWlGk5LqK0d7xBRGWM/BdMll3mH4hP 0AsOy0cwL54tvGABfAm7C/xK2MgV6yudDMJkXORWv1oG0v5HEX0zF7L+bv7zK8ch 91LPdA2FU3j7rKIlNS/2 =adMa -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54f6b120.3080...@gmail.com
Bug#779667: RFS: node-bluebird/2.9.13+dfsg-1 [ITP]
On 03/03/2015 09:33 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: * Fix duplicate package descriptions You may want to tweak these a bit to be more in line with other node-* and libjs-* packages. See for example node-q: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-q.git/tree/debian/control And also what npm2deb generates. I pushed a change with my suggested improvement. Changes looked good - will double check later tonight. * Remove async.js and use packaged version instead This looks a lintian false positive, the async.js in bluebird is quite different from the node-async one. Compare: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-async.git/tree/lib/async.js http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-bluebird.git/tree/src/async.js I think reverting this change and adding a lintian override instead is a better idea. Whoops - I should of checked that. I was in a hurry to finish - that is never a good thing. I have a few family commitments tonight, but after that I will fix. Cheers, Ross signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Try 2: Bug#778729: RFS: git-tools/1.0.0-1 [ITP]
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 02:53:52AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: * Package name: git-tools * URL : https://github.com/MestreLion/git-tools It builds those binary packages: git-restore-mtime - set timestamps to the date of a file's last commit Hi guys again! Lemme ping you, as sadly no one offered to sponsor this package yet... I made a few changes: * fixed a reference to GPL2 (should be GPL3) * moved my hand-crafted manpages to debian/ (so they don't require a patch) * actually installed them (only the help2manned one was there[¹]) * renamed the source to git-tools, per Chris Lamb's suggestion. * picked a fix from upstream The m.d.n page: http://mentors.debian.net/package/git-tools dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/git-tools/git-tools_1.0.0-1.dsc The main installed tool, git restore-mtime sets the timestamp of each file in the working dir to the date of the last commit that touched that file. This is useful whenever timestamps provide some value, as opposed to just being older/newer than the result of a make command. There's three other tools: git clone-subset butchers a repository (incl. history) leaving only files you choose, git find-uncommitted-repos searches your filesystem for unclean git repos, git strip-merge helps drop some files during merge. It would be nice if someone could sponsor this for me. [¹]. Lintian checks only programs in [/usr]/[s]bin, not in /usr/lib/git-core, so this did not get caught. -- // If you believe in so-called intellectual property, please immediately // cease using counterfeit alphabets. Instead, contact the nearest temple // of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all // your writing needs, for Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory prices. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150303225215.ga8...@angband.pl
Re: Trouble with git import-orig --pristine-tar
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 12:02:57PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 09:45:25PM +0100, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: git import-orig --pristine-tar ../fastaq_3.2.0.orig.tar.gz I know that you need the upstream version: What is the upstream version? [3.2.0 in the part of quote you deleted is the question asked by git-import-orig if --upstream-version was not passed. Well, the question was answered by Enter - so the version is simply 3.2.0. The problem can be considered as solved since I fixed the broken Git repository thanks to some other hints here. Thanks for all intends to help Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150303105530.ge26...@an3as.eu
