Bug#844185: RFS: fvwm/2.6.7-1 [ITA] -- f? virtual window manager
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Axel Beckert wrote: > Hi Jaimos, > Hi Axel, thanks for responding and looking at my package. > I've had a short review of your changes and only found a few minor > nitpicks so far: > They were informative and helping me learn, I have updated the package following their advice. >> - New features and bug fixes. For a full list between 2.6.5 and 2.6.7 >> see /usr/share/doc/fvwm/NEWS.gz > > Since the upstream NEWS file is defacto a changelog, it wouldn't be > bad if the upstream NEWS file would be installed as > /usr/share/doc/fvwm/changelog.gz The NEWS file is now used as the changelog. >> * Upstream moved from cvs to git. Updated watch file. > > Please use https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/releases instead of > https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/tags in debian/watch. (May need some > additional tweaking.) Otherwise you would download a Git snapshot of > the tagged commit instead of the real released tar ball. Updated. I somehow got fixated on tags due to the old releases being there, thanks for pointing out releases was far easier to use. > All the Lintian hardening warnings could be fixed by just adding this > line to debian/rules (e.g. after the DH_VERBOSE line): > > export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS=hardening=+all Updated > From the debdiff between the current and your source package: > > %: > - dh $@ --with autoreconf > + dh $@ > > Why have you removed "--with autoreconf" while keeping the > Build-Depends on dh-autoreconf? This change is also not mentioned in > the debian/changelog entry. > Thanks for noticing this, I had a build problem on the first trial release due to script relying on .git causing the autoreconf build to fail and removed that to build from provided files. Upstream fixed it, but after focusing on other aspects of the package I had forgotten I had done that. > My suggestion to solve this is to leave debian/rules as it is now, > remove the build-dependency on dh-autoreconf and use debhelper compat > level 10 instead (which implies --with autoreconf and --parallel) -- > and mention that in the debian/changelog. > > As far as I can see, you can also safely drop the build-dependency on > autotools-dev as its not used directly and debhelper depends on it > (and on dh-autoreconf) nowadays. At least it still builds fine in > pbuilder (without these two build-dependencies, and with debhelper > compat level 10). > Updated. Changed compat to level 10 and the debhelper depends as well, then dropped the depends and was able to get it to build in pbuilder as well. > Despite those are all rather minor issues, I'd be happy if you could > come up with an updated source package addressing most of these issues > (at least the debian/watch and missing debian/changelog items). Done. I have done all the above and also figured out how to get more output from lintian. fixed some additional spelling errors that were found as well. You can find the updated files in the same location http://fvwmforums.org/fvwm-2.6.7/ Thanks again, jaimos
Bug#844577: RFS: openldap/2.4.44+dfsg-1 [RC]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor to upload an updated openldap package. The package can be found on alioth: http://pkg-openldap.alioth.debian.org/2.4.44/openldap_2.4.44+dfsg-1.dsc http://pkg-openldap.alioth.debian.org/2.4.44/openldap_2.4.44+dfsg-1_amd64.changes (Sorry for the unconventional hosting. mentors.d.n apparently doesn't like me this week.) Changes since the last upload can be seen in the .changes linked above. The git repository can also be found on alioth: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-openldap/openldap.git This is an interim upload, to unblock the removal of openslp (#815364) and heimdal (#836885) from stretch. It also fixes another RC bug: #330695. I intend to make another upload later to improve the upgrade handling (automate additional cases and provide more helpful messaging) and hopefully fix additional bugs. Thanks for considering, Ryan signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#844185: RFS: fvwm/2.6.7-1 [ITA] -- f? virtual window manager
Hi Jaimos, Jaimos Skriletz wrote: > I am looking to update and maintain the latest release of fvwm in > Debian. I have created a source package for review Thanks! > along with have had a short correspondence with the current > maintainer, sharing my work with him. The current maintainer said he > no longer uses fvwm and if I'm willing to take responsibility I am > welcomed to. > > I have shared my work with the maintainer but besides that one short > email, he has not gotten back to me. Vincent: I assume you are aware of this sponsoring request and are fine with the adoption of Debian's fvwm package. I've had a short review of your changes and only found a few minor nitpicks so far: > - New features and bug fixes. For a full list between 2.6.5 and 2.6.7 > see /usr/share/doc/fvwm/NEWS.gz Since the upstream NEWS file is defacto a changelog, it wouldn't be bad if the upstream NEWS file would be installed as /usr/share/doc/fvwm/changelog.gz This can be achieved by removing NEWS from debian/fvwm.docs and adding the following override to debian/rules: override_dh_installchangelogs: dh_installchangelogs NEWS Would fix the (pedantic-level) lintian warning no-upstream-changelog. > * Upstream moved from cvs to git. Updated watch file. Please use https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/releases instead of https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/tags in debian/watch. (May need some additional tweaking.) Otherwise you would download a Git snapshot of the tagged commit instead of the real released tar ball. Compare: → md5sum 2.6.7.tar.gz fvwm_2.6.7.orig.tar.gz fvwm-2.6.7.tar.gz 9fa7c3968a8872a228ce186d5bce8cc1 2.6.7.tar.gz← https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/archive/2.6.7.tar.gz 56ab83b0afa211729fce4a4d6fc57e8e fvwm_2.6.7.orig.tar.gz ← http://fvwmforums.org/fvwm-2.6.7/fvwm_2.6.7.orig.tar.gz 56ab83b0afa211729fce4a4d6fc57e8e fvwm-2.6.7.tar.gz ← https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/releases/download/2.6.7/fvwm-2.6.7.tar.gz All the Lintian hardening warnings could be fixed by just adding this line to debian/rules (e.g. after the DH_VERBOSE line): export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS=hardening=+all >From the debdiff between the current and your source package: %: - dh $@ --with autoreconf + dh $@ Why have you removed "--with autoreconf" while keeping the Build-Depends on dh-autoreconf? This change is also not mentioned in the debian/changelog entry. My suggestion to solve this is to leave debian/rules as it is now, remove the build-dependency on dh-autoreconf and use debhelper compat level 10 instead (which implies --with autoreconf and --parallel) -- and mention that in the debian/changelog. As far as I can see, you can also safely drop the build-dependency on autotools-dev as its not used directly and debhelper depends on it (and on dh-autoreconf) nowadays. At least it still builds fine in pbuilder (without these two build-dependencies, and with debhelper compat level 10). Despite those are all rather minor issues, I'd be happy if you could come up with an updated source package addressing most of these issues (at least the debian/watch and missing debian/changelog items). Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert , http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 `-| 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
Re: Debian privacy policy
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:17 AM, Ole Streicher wrote: > a reference that Debian prefers strong privacy AFAICT we don't have an official statement about this, but: https://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2008/02/msg00060.html https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/d4a73d08dbd2cf670b3aedf63c175...@linuxpenguins.xyz https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/580dac7dc7ed92becf29b6fb93b35...@linuxpenguins.xyz https://www.debian.org/vote/2016/vote_004 Policy says: For packages in the main archive, no required [debian/rules] targets may attempt network access. https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-debianrules My personal opinion is that Debian policy should be: Debian packages must respect sysadmin and user privacy and encourage sysadmins and users to respect the privacy of everyone. So, disabled by default, informed consent and don't manipulate people into destroying their privacy with click-through stuff. Some discussion of click-through culture is in the recent episode of FaiF: http://faif.us/cast/2016/nov/01/0x5E/ -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Bug#844565: RFS: node-husl/6.0.1+dfsg-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-husl" * Package name: node-husl Version : 6.0.1+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Alexei Boronine * URL : http://www.husl-colors.org/ * License : Expat Section : web It builds these binary packages: libjs-husl - Human-friendly HSL - Javascript node-husl - Human-friendly HSL - NodeJS To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/node-husl Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-husl/node- husl_6.0.1+dfsg-1.dsc Debian packaging can be found here: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-husl.git Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: #844230) Regards, Ross Gammon -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers xenial-updates APT policy: (500, 'xenial-updates'), (500, 'xenial-security'), (500, 'xenial'), (100, 'xenial-backports') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-24-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Re: can't upldoad to mentors
OK, it seems like it was a problem with gpg, I had to update both my chroot and laptop, build again (thanks for pointing me in this direction, I didn't see that the build signing process failed) and it just worked. Sorry for the noise and thanks for your help! On 2016-11-16 09:05+0800, gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote: > Remove the buildinfo line from the changes file, sign, and upload again > > On November 16, 2016 12:53:46 AM GMT+08:00, "Félix Sipma" > wrote: >>Hi! >> >>It seems like I can't upload to mentors anymore... Do you think there >>is a >>problem on my side? >> >> $ dput mentors ../build-area/patat_0.4.0.0-1_amd64.changes >>Uploading patat using http to mentors (host: mentors.debian.net; >>directory: /upload) >> running checksum: verify checksums before uploading >> running gpg: check GnuPG signatures before the upload >> gpg: Signature made 2016-11-15T15:29:52 CET >>gpg:using RSA key >>611F861BAE64C6C14A26522FA710823E33BDDA81 >>gpg: Good signature from "Félix Sipma " >>[ultimate] >>gpg: aka "Félix Sipma " >>[ultimate] >>gpg: aka "Félix Sipma " >>[ultimate] >>Primary key fingerprint: 2E6B 7C0E 128B 8F9B 16DA A76A 5857 883E 277D >>B3CC >> Subkey fingerprint: 611F 861B AE64 C6C1 4A26 522F A710 823E 33BD DA81 >> >>running suite-mismatch: check the target distribution for common errors >>running protected-distribution: warn before uploading to distributions >>where a special policy applies >> Uploading patat_0.4.0.0-1.dsc >> Upload permissions error >> >> You either don't have the rights to upload a file, or, if this is on >>ftp-master, you may have tried to overwrite a file already on the >>server. >> >>Continuing anyway in case you want to recover from an incomplete >>upload. >> No file was uploaded, however. >> Uploading patat_0.4.0.0.orig.tar.gz >> Upload permissions error >> >> You either don't have the rights to upload a file, or, if this is on >>ftp-master, you may have tried to overwrite a file already on the >>server. >> >>Continuing anyway in case you want to recover from an incomplete >>upload. >> No file was uploaded, however. >> Uploading patat_0.4.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz >> ^[[AUpload permissions error >> >> You either don't have the rights to upload a file, or, if this is on >>ftp-master, you may have tried to overwrite a file already on the >>server. >> >>Continuing anyway in case you want to recover from an incomplete >>upload. >> No file was uploaded, however. >> Uploading patat_0.4.0.0-1_20161115T142950z-7b479c6b.buildinfo >> Upload permissions error >> >> You either don't have the rights to upload a file, or, if this is on >>ftp-master, you may have tried to overwrite a file already on the >>server. >> >>Continuing anyway in case you want to recover from an incomplete >>upload. >> No file was uploaded, however. >> Uploading patat_0.4.0.0-1_amd64.deb >> Upload permissions error >> >> You either don't have the rights to upload a file, or, if this is on >>ftp-master, you may have tried to overwrite a file already on the >>server. >> >>Continuing anyway in case you want to recover from an incomplete >>upload. >> No file was uploaded, however. >> Uploading patat_0.4.0.0-1_amd64.changes >> Upload permissions error >> >> You either don't have the rights to upload a file, or, if this is on >>ftp-master, you may have tried to overwrite a file already on the >>server. >> >>Continuing anyway in case you want to recover from an incomplete >>upload. >> No file was uploaded, however. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#844462: marked as done (RFS: nitrogen/1.6.0-1 [QA])
Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:04:14 +0100 with message-id <1479330254.7990.6.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#844462: RFS: nitrogen/1.6.0-1 [QA] has caused the Debian Bug report #844462, regarding RFS: nitrogen/1.6.0-1 [QA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 844462: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=844462 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hello I'm looking for an sponsor for my QA upload to tsocks it closes a bug and prevents a FTBFS (compat level 7), I've improved the general shape of the package and enables it to build on !linux The changelog follows nitrogen (1.6.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * QA upload * Set the maintainer to Debian QA Group * New upstream release (Closes: #796980) * Increase the compat level to 10 - Build depend on dh > 10 - Remove build dependency on autotools-dev, autoconf, autopoint, and automake * Remove build dependency on dpkg-deb (>= 1.16.1~) * Bump standards version to 3.9.8, the following changes were needed - Remove obsolete menu file * Enable hardened build * Simplify debian/rules * Drop old pathches - fix_FTBFS_binutils-gold.patch, no longer needed - add_desktop_file.patch, merged upstream * Fix spelling on manpage - spelling-fixes.patch * Enable build on !linux, thanks Christoph Egger for the patch (Closes: #794901) * Package upstream's git log as changelog, as the Changelog in the source is very outdated * Add README.source * Packaging is now maintained on a git repo under collab-maint * Add Vcs fields to debian/control * Add pristine-tar to the git repo * Add gbp.conf the git repo can be found at https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/nitrogen.git thanks -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.8.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi Gustavo, thanks for the overhaul of the package. (nitpick: d/copyright could also have some update to dep5 format and needs rechecking if the years are still ok) nevertheless, Uploaded. Thanks for your contributions! -- tobi Am Mittwoch, den 16.11.2016, 10:36 +0800 schrieb gustavo panizzo: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Hello > > I'm looking for an sponsor for my QA upload to tsocks > > > it closes a bug and prevents a FTBFS (compat level 7), > I've improved the general shape of the package and enables > it to build on !linux > > The changelog follows > > nitrogen (1.6.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > * QA upload > * Set the maintainer to Debian QA Group > * New upstream release (Closes: #796980) > * Increase the compat level to 10 > - Build depend on dh > 10 > - Remove build dependency on autotools-dev, autoconf, autopoint, > and automake > * Remove build dependency on dpkg-deb (>= 1.16.1~) > * Bump standards version to 3.9.8, the following changes were > needed > - Remove obsolete menu file > * Enable hardened build > * Simplify debian/rules > * Drop old pathches > - fix_FTBFS_binutils-gold.patch, no longer needed > - add_desktop_file.patch, merged upstream > * Fix spelling on manpage > - spelling-fixes.patch > * Enable build on !linux, thanks Christoph Egger > for the patch (Closes: #794901) > * Package upstream's git log as changelog, as the Changelog in the > source > is very outdated > * Add README.source > * Packaging is now maintained on a git repo under collab-maint > * Add Vcs fields to debian/control > * Add pristine-tar to the git repo > * Add gbp.conf > > the git repo can be found at > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/nitrogen.git > > thanks > > > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: stretch/sid > APT prefers testing > APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > > Kernel: Linux 4.8.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)--- End Message ---
Bug#840928: marked as done (RFS on ITP: node-doctrine/1.5.0-1 -- JSDoc parser)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2016 19:01:57 + (UTC) with message-id <957231127.2872685.1479322917...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#840928: RFS on ITP: node-doctrine/1.5.0-1 -- JSDoc parser has caused the Debian Bug report #840928, regarding RFS on ITP: node-doctrine/1.5.0-1 -- JSDoc parser to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 840928: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840928 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-doctrine" * Package name: node-doctrine Version : 1.5.0-1 Upstream Author : Usuke Suzuki and other contributors * URL : https://github.com/eslint/doctrine * License : BSD-2-clause Section : web It builds those binary packages: node-doctrine - JSDoc parser To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/node-doctrine Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-doctrine/node-doctrine_1.5.0-1.dsc It is packaged within the Debian Javascript Maintainers team: Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-doctrine.git Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-doctrine.git Cheers, Snark on #debian-js --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, >Upstream relicensed things under Apache-2.0 ; please see the new 2.0.0 >upstream version, available both here: yep I noticed, I subscribed to that github issue :p >I hope it's better this time, this was the only blocker, sponsored! G.--- End Message ---
Bug#844483: RFS: python-backports-abc/0.5-1
Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-backports-abc"
Bug#844485: marked as done (RFS: node-moment/2.16.0+ds-1)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2016 18:48:01 + (UTC) with message-id <485264545.2773625.1479322081...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#844485: RFS: node-moment/2.16.0+ds-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #844485, regarding RFS: node-moment/2.16.0+ds-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 844485: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=844485 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-moment" * Package name: node-moment Version : 2.16.0+ds-1 Upstream Author : Tim Wood, Iskren Chernev and Moment.js contributors * URL : https://github.com/moment/moment * License : Expat Section : web It builds those binary packages: libjs-moment - Work with dates in JavaScript (library) node-moment - Work with dates in JavaScript (Node.js module) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/node-moment Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-moment/node-moment_2.16.0+ds-1.dsc It is packaged within the Debian Javascript Maintainers' team's git repository: Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-moment.git Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-moment.git Thanks, Snark on #debian-js --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-moment" --- End Message ---
Bug#844488: RFS: node-regenerate/1.3.2-1
Hi, >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-regenerate"
Bug#844510: marked as done (RFS: pyfr/1.5.0-1)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2016 18:09:57 + (UTC) with message-id <953110628.2768409.1479319797...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#844510: RFS: pyfr/1.5.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #844510, regarding RFS: pyfr/1.5.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 844510: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=844510 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyfr" * Package name: pyfr Version : 1.5.0-1 Upstream Author : Imperial College London * URL : http://www.pyfr.org * License : BSD Section : science It builds those binary packages: pyfr - flux reconstruction in Python pyfr-doc - documentation for PyFR To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/pyfr Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pyfr/pyfr_1.5.0-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Track GitHub instead of PyPI releases. * Refresh patch queue. * Add missing build dependencies on h5py, mako, numpy and pytools. * Add new build dependency on gimmik. * Upgrade packaging to debhelper 10. * Drop superfluous Testsuite field. Regards, Ghislain Vaillant --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyfr" --- End Message ---
Re: Debian privacy policy
Hello Ole, On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 05:17:32PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > for a discussion with upstream (removal of a default "anonymously > logging home" feature), I would like to have a reference that Debian > prefers strong privacy (no default logging, even not anonymously) over > usefullness for upstream. The only point I could find is the "Our > priorities are our users and free software" point in the Social > Contract, which is very general and interpretable. The policy seems to > be silent about this. Did I just not look careful enough? We have several Lintian warnings connected to privacy (see tags privacy-breach-*). Lintian reflects community consensus on packaging standards as much as policy does. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Transporte de Carga de Puertos y Distribución Nacional
[1] web [2] nuestros servicios forum [3] contacto servicios ofrecidos transmaquina transporte de carga y alquiler de maquinaria estimados srs. quedamos a sus ordenes como proveedores serios y motivados a prestarles un excelente servicio en toda venezuela. en caso de necesitar servicios de: transporte de carga alquiler de maquinaria de construcción alquiler de grúas telescopicas tansporte de carga extradimensionada transporte de cemento a granel reciban un cordial saludo, luis arriaga gerente comercial [4] ven...@transmaquina.com.ve 0424-1362899 [5] www.transmaquina.com.ve [6] visitar página web información adicional cobertura geográfica prestamos servicios en toda venezuela , ya que trabajamos como aliados en las principales ciudades del país. venta de equipos prestamos el servicio de venta de equipos. nos encargamos de publicidad de venta de camiones, gandolas, maquinaria, grúas y montacargas. este mensaje fue enviado a t...@test.com por gerencia comercial - luis arriaga caracas, miranda, venezuela, caracas, miranda 1070, venezuela cancelar suscripción| administre su suscripción| remitir email| reportar abuso References: 1. u=5f04de7 2. u=5f04de7 3. u=5f04de9 4. mailto:ven...@transmaquina.com.ve 5. u=5f04dea 6. u=5f04deb This message was sent to debian-mentors@lists.debian.org by vent...@transmaquina.com.ve You can modify/update your subscription via the link below. Unsubscribe from all mailings http://lt.bmetrack.com/c/su?e=A57143&c=717D3&l=F60F9B9&email=5OxzrBLumxPynvuzaF1bp7%2FeNWSbTFLphENb71UYrR8%3D&relid=A0B110C Caracas, Miranda, Venezuela, Caracas, Miranda 1070, Venezuela Email Marketing BenchmarkEmail.com [http://lt.bmetrack.com]
Bug#844537: RFS: fxlinuxprint/1.1.0+ds-1 [ITP] -- printer driver for Fuji Xerox printers
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-print...@lists.debian.org, rogershim...@gmail.com Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fxlinuxprint" I already tried to contact with printing team [0][1], but nobody responded about sponsor, so I come to mentors again. [0] https://bugs.debian.org/841194 [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-printing/2016/10/msg00181.html * Package name: fxlinuxprint Version : 1.1.0+ds-1 Upstream Author : Fuji Xerox Co.,Ltd. * URL : https://www.fujixerox.co.jp/download/apeosport/download/c4300series/linux_module.html * License : GPL-2+ Section : text It builds those binary packages: printer-driver-fujixerox - printer driver for Fuji Xerox printers To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/fxlinuxprint Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fxlinuxprint/fxlinuxprint_1.1.0+ds-1.dsc or you can use git-buildpackage to build: gbp clone --pristine-tar https://github.com/rogers0/fxlinuxprint git checkout mentors gbp buildpackage -uc -us --git-ignore-branch --git-pristine-tar Thank you! Cheers, -- Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
Re: Debian privacy policy
Hi Ole, > for a discussion with upstream (removal of a default "anonymously > logging home" feature), I would like to have a reference that Debian > prefers strong privacy (no default logging, even not anonymously) over > usefullness for upstream. The only point I could find is the "Our > priorities are our users and free software" point in the Social > Contract, which is very general and interpretable. The policy seems to > be silent about this. Did I just not look careful enough? I'm not sure about the policy but one could refer to the fact that such privacy breaches are considered Lintian errors, e.g. as defined by the 'privacy-breach-*' tags, e.g. [1]. You can get a full list by searching for 'privacy' on [2]. Cheers Sascha [1] https://lintian.debian.org/tags/privacy-breach-facebook.html [2] https://lintian.debian.org/tags-all.html
Bug#844532: RFS: gli/0.8.2.0+ds1-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gli" * Package name: gli Version : 0.8.2.0+ds1-1 Upstream Author : Christophe Riccio * URL : https://github.com/g-truc/gli * License : Expat Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libgli-dev - C++ image library for graphics software libgli-doc - documentation for the OpenGL Image (GLI) library To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/gli Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gli/gli_0.8.2.0+ds1-1.dsc Successful build on debomatic: http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/gli/0.8.2.0+ds1-1/buildlog Changes since the last upload: * New upstream version 0.8.2.0+ds1 * Update patch queue. - Drop patch Discard-readme-from-docs.patch, applied upstream. - New patch Fix-path-to-project-logo.patch. - New patch Fix-project-version.patch. * Update packaging according to new doxygen setup. * Drop changelogs install override, no longer applicable. Regards, Ghislain Vaillant
Debian privacy policy
Hi, for a discussion with upstream (removal of a default "anonymously logging home" feature), I would like to have a reference that Debian prefers strong privacy (no default logging, even not anonymously) over usefullness for upstream. The only point I could find is the "Our priorities are our users and free software" point in the Social Contract, which is very general and interpretable. The policy seems to be silent about this. Did I just not look careful enough? Cheers Ole
Bug#835274: dh-text no longer needed
control: tags -1 moreinfo >Of course, you are free to use/drop usage of dietlibc for whatever reason, and >maybe there are others than just a specific bug. But irrespective of whether >you keep >building against it, I'd like to fix potential bugs. this is worth a moreinfo tag :) G.
Bug#835274: dh-text no longer needed
Hi there, Am 16. November 2016 10:28:41 MEZ, schrieb Dmitry Bogatov : > * Drop diet libc build due issues with errno As a current co-maintainer of dietlibc in Debian, could you elaborate here? I've spent the last couple of months fixing all sorts of bugs in there (and improving packaging, for example dietlibc-dev is now M-A: same), and if problems remain, I'd also like to see them fixed. Of course, you are free to use/drop usage of dietlibc for whatever reason, and maybe there are others than just a specific bug. But irrespective of whether you keep building against it, I'd like to fix potential bugs. Thanks, Christian
Bug#844510: RFS: pyfr/1.5.0-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyfr" * Package name: pyfr Version : 1.5.0-1 Upstream Author : Imperial College London * URL : http://www.pyfr.org * License : BSD Section : science It builds those binary packages: pyfr - flux reconstruction in Python pyfr-doc - documentation for PyFR To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/pyfr Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pyfr/pyfr_1.5.0-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Track GitHub instead of PyPI releases. * Refresh patch queue. * Add missing build dependencies on h5py, mako, numpy and pytools. * Add new build dependency on gimmik. * Upgrade packaging to debhelper 10. * Drop superfluous Testsuite field. Regards, Ghislain Vaillant
Bug#844488: RFS: node-regenerate/1.3.2-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-regenerate" * Package name: node-regenerate Version : 1.3.2-1 Upstream Author : Mathias Bynens * URL : https://mths.be/regenerate * License : Expat Section : web It builds those binary packages: libjs-regenerate - Unicode-aware regular expression generator (JavaScript library) node-regenerate - Unicode-aware regular expression generator (Node.js module) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/node-regenerate Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-regenerate/node-regenerate_1.3.2-1.dsc It is packaged within the Debian Javascript Maintainer's team's git repository : Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-regenerate.git Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-regenerate.git Thanks, Snark on #debian-js
Bug#835274: dh-text no longer needed
control: tags -1 -moreinfo control: unblock -1 by 834313 control: close 834313 With dpkg-dev >= 1.18.11, implementing S:field substitution, dh-text is no longer needed, this request is active again. In attachment there is an email from current maintainer (in CC), giving me permission to make these changes on his behalf. Changes since last upload: * Write debian/watch * Change source package format to quilt, remove manual patches application * Convert package to use debhelper * Use `dh-runit' to install runit scripts and generate log scripts (Closes: #832656) * Use `dh-buildinfo' to simplify tracking bugs, related to build-tools * Avoid need of hand-written maintainer scripts by use of `dh-runit' and `dh-sysuser' * Drop diet libc build due issues with errno * Remove no longer needed README files * Move 'debian/crontab' into 'debian/contrib' for more clean package layout * Enable hardening * Fix @dircategory in texinfo manual * Install `doc-base' document * Add Homepage field * Bump standards version to 3.9.8 (no changes needed) * Remove Section field from `bcron-run' field, since it duplicated one defined in first paragraph. * Update Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser fields * Convert `debian/copyrigh' to dep5 format * Use S:fieldname substitution to avoid duplication in `debian/control'. + Add versioned dependency on (dpkg-dev >= 1.18.11) Regards, Dmitry Bogatov -- X-Web-Site: https://sinsekvu.github.io | Note that I process my email in batch, Accept-Languages: eo,ru,en | at most once every 24 hours. If matter Accept: text/plain, text/x-diff| is urgent, you have my phone number. --- Begin Message --- On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 01:53:50PM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > I investigated issue a bit more. From all listed -run packages, currently > only following are problematic: > > bcron-run > twoftpd-run > tinydns-run > > I started fixing bcron-run, and discovered, that to use dh_runit, I > need also at least dh_installdeb, dh_prep and dh_gencontrol. And this is > on half way to converting to debhelper (which is inapporiate for NMU). > > Here I ask you for permission: > > - convert those 3 packages to debhelper and upload them with myself >as maintainer (unfortunately, I can't do this in NMU). Feel free >to add 'I reserve right to take this package back' clause to your >permission. > > - the same for rest of -run packages. This is not so urgent, since >right now they are coinstallable with runit/unstable, and I do not >plan to touch them, as long as they just work. > > I am sorry about all this situation, but since I need to resolve > (Bug#832656), I am forced to bother you. And since this bug is > serious, I really want to resolve it till freeze. Dropping a mail > on debian-mentors should suffice as permission. Hi Dmitry, I'm still much interested in the djbdns (provides tinydns-run) and bcron packages, while twoftpd isn't that fency any more. If you want, please take over maintainership for twoftpd. For the other two packages, I suggest you switch them to debhelper (I never liked that) with my permission, since it appears to be really necessary. Add yourself as uploader, but please (not yet) switch the maintainer. Best Regards, thanks for all the time you put into Debian, Gerrit. --- End Message ---
Bug#844485: RFS: node-moment/2.16.0+ds-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-moment" * Package name: node-moment Version : 2.16.0+ds-1 Upstream Author : Tim Wood, Iskren Chernev and Moment.js contributors * URL : https://github.com/moment/moment * License : Expat Section : web It builds those binary packages: libjs-moment - Work with dates in JavaScript (library) node-moment - Work with dates in JavaScript (Node.js module) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/node-moment Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-moment/node-moment_2.16.0+ds-1.dsc It is packaged within the Debian Javascript Maintainers' team's git repository: Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-moment.git Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-moment.git Thanks, Snark on #debian-js
Bug#844483: RFS: python-backports-abc/0.5-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-backports-abc" * Package name: python-backports-abc Version : 0.5-1 Upstream Author : Stefan Bahnel et al. * URL : https://github.com/cython/backports_abc * License : Python-2.0 Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-backports-abc - Backport of the "collections.abc" stdlib module (Python 2) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-backports-abc Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-backports-abc/python-backports-abc_0.5-1.dsc It is packaged within the Debian Python Modules Team's git repository: Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/python-modules/packages/python-backports-abc.git Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/python-modules/packages/python-backports-abc.git/ Thanks, Snark on #debian-python
Bug#840928: RFS on ITP: node-doctrine/1.5.0-1 -- JSDoc parser
Hi, On 18/10/2016 16:02, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: Hi Julien (note: this is probably for Upstream not Debian) I have seen the LICENSE.closure-compiler file, it is mentioned in README.md, but I didn't find any trace of it in the code. Same thing : there is a LICENSE.esprima, and they mention it in the README.md, but I have found nothing about it in the code. Should I still put something in d/copyright? But then which file should I point to? "some of functions is derived from *" lets ignore grammar, I guess this means "some of the functions in the source code, have been derived from foo/bar" so, you need to ask them which functions, or maybe release under FOO and BAR and FOOBAR licenses the whole package. I'm not sure, but copying files with a different copyright shouldn't be ignored, if you can't know which files have such licenses, my suggestion is to relicense the whole package. But as said, this is something for upstream. Upstream relicensed things under Apache-2.0 ; please see the new 2.0.0 upstream version, available both here: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-doctrine/node-doctrine_2.0.0-1.dsc and here: Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-doctrine.git Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-doctrine.git I hope it's better this time, Snark on #debian-js
Bug#844482: RFS/ITP: node-vlq/0.2.0-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-vlq" * Package name: node-vlq Version : 0.2.0-1 Upstream Author : Rich Harris * URL : https://github.com/Rich-Harris/vlq * License : Expat Section : web It builds those binary packages: node-vlq - Variable-length quantity mapper for Node.js To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/node-vlq Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-vlq/node-vlq_0.2.0-1.dsc It is packaged within the Debian Javascript Maintainers git repository: Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-vlq.git Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-vlq.git Cheers, Snark on #debian-js
