Popcon statistics over time for set of packages
Hi, I wonder if there is some way to get popcon statistics for a set of packages to compare their usage over time. The background is that I consider to compare the dependencies of Blends metapackages in one graph. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#854212: RFS: synergy/1.8.7-stable+dfsg.1-1 [ITA]
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 2:24 AM, Arturo Borrero Gonzalezwrote: > On 6 February 2017 at 09:08, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez > wrote: >> >> I'm doing a test build now. If all is fine, I will sponsor the upload. > > The package seems to FTBFS due to a failing test: > > [...] > [--] Global test environment tear-down > [==] 9 tests from 3 test cases ran. (2153 ms total) > [ PASSED ] 8 tests. > [ FAILED ] 1 test, listed below: > [ FAILED ] ArchInternetTests.get > > 1 FAILED TEST > debian/rules:94: recipe for target 'test' failed > make: *** [test] Error 1 > dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error exit status > 2 > [...] > > My complete build log here: http://termbin.com/mrib > > Please, fix and ping me. I have disabled some tests that depend on network access that will fix the FTBFS. I didn't fully consider how the migration process works during a freeze. It was not my intent wasn't for this package to be pushed into stretch because it doesn't appear acceptable under the freeze policy. So I have changed the distribution to be 'experimental' based on Sean Whitton's suggestion. A new package was uploaded to mentors.
Bug#841185: closing RFS: genwqe-user/4.0.18-1 [ITP #826774]
Hi Fernando, On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 22:44:49 -0200 Fernando Seiti Furusatowrote: > I fixed some problems with the package, that is why I reopened this RFS. This packages sounds in a good shape for me. If no one has objection to it, I would like to sponsor it to be included in contrib archive.
Bug#854395: RFS: golang-go-xdg/0~bzr20140219-2 [RC] -- Go interface for XDG standards
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 01:04:12AM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: > This pkg is removed from testing on Jan. 14th [0]. > So it means even after fixing the FTBFS, it cannot go back to testing again? Yes, until the stretch release. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#854395: RFS: golang-go-xdg/0~bzr20140219-2 [RC] -- Go interface for XDG standards
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Andrey Rahmatullinwrote: > On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 12:33:08AM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: >> Changes since the last upload: >> >> * Team upload. >> >> [ Paul Tagliamonte ] >> * Use a secure transport for the Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser URL >> >> [ Roger Shimizu ] >> * debian/control: >> - Update Build-Depends on golang-check.v1-dev, in stead of >> golang-gocheck-dev which is already non-active upstream. >> - Use cgit URL for Vcs-Browser. >> * debian/patches: >> - Add a patch to use golang-check.v1-dev. >> - Add a patch to remove failure tests (Closes: #830446). > If you want this to go to stretch please read > https://release.debian.org/stretch/freeze_policy.html first. Thanks for your reply! This pkg is removed from testing on Jan. 14th [0]. So it means even after fixing the FTBFS, it cannot go back to testing again? I already tried to minimize the changes.. [0] https://tracker.debian.org/news/832624 Cheers, -- Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
Bug#854395: RFS: golang-go-xdg/0~bzr20140219-2 [RC] -- Go interface for XDG standards
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 12:33:08AM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: > Changes since the last upload: > > * Team upload. > > [ Paul Tagliamonte ] > * Use a secure transport for the Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser URL > > [ Roger Shimizu ] > * debian/control: > - Update Build-Depends on golang-check.v1-dev, in stead of > golang-gocheck-dev which is already non-active upstream. > - Use cgit URL for Vcs-Browser. > * debian/patches: > - Add a patch to use golang-check.v1-dev. > - Add a patch to remove failure tests (Closes: #830446). If you want this to go to stretch please read https://release.debian.org/stretch/freeze_policy.html first. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
BeMyStreet devient gratuit pour les pros
BeMyStreet devient gratuit pour les pros. Nous avons une bonne nouvelle pour vous ! BeMyStreet devient gratuit pour les professionnels pour votre plus grand plaisir. Alors ne vous en privez surtout pas, vendez en ligne facilement et profitez de tous les avantages BeMyStreet : ***Visibilité*** Votre boutique apparaît dans chacune des rues de vos abonnés. ***Simplicité*** Gérez vos pages et votre vitrine simplement grâce à nos outils et nos conseils. Multipliez vos contacts* Les relations se tissent de proche en proche sur le réseau social. ***Efficacité*** Communiquez efficacement grâce à vos pages, vos actualités ou la messagerie. **Opportunité*** Avancez et sautez le pas de la vente en ligne, avec BeMyStreet c'est simple. **Aucun risque** Accédez à ce concept unique, dynamique et innovateur pour un tarif sans risque. BeMyStreet est un réseau social orienté vente en ligne sur lequel les professionnels bénéficient d'outils simples et efficaces pour être visibles, communiquer, et développer leur activité en ligne. BeMystreet se rémunère principalement sur les commissions de vente de vos produits, cela vous garantit que nous ferons toujours le maximum pour que vous vendiez vos produits ! Alors inscrivez-vous, parlez-en autour de vous et partagez... Avec la gratuité, plus aucun risque pour vous, vous avez tout à gagner... Découvrir ici : http://bemystreet.com Vous avez une question ? N'hésitez pas à nous contacter en répondant à ce mail. A tout de suite sur BeMyStreet bemystreet.com
Bug#854395: RFS: golang-go-xdg/0~bzr20140219-2 [RC] -- Go interface for XDG standards
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org, sergio.schve...@canonical.com, t...@pault.ag, rogershim...@gmail.com Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "golang-go-xdg" * Package name: golang-go-xdg Version : 0~bzr20140219-2 Upstream Author : John R. Lenton. * URL : https://launchpad.net/go-xdg * License : BSD-2-Clause Section : devel It builds those binary packages: golang-go-xdg-dev - Go interface for XDG standards To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/golang-go-xdg Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/golang-go-xdg/golang-go-xdg_0~bzr20140219-2.dsc or you can use git-buildpackage to build: gbp clone --pristine-tar https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-go/packages/golang-go-xdg.git cd golang-go-xdg git checkout mentors gbp buildpackage -uc -us --git-ignore-branch --git-pristine-tar I also made it available on debomatic (amd64): http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/golang-go-xdg/0~bzr20140219-2/buildlog Changes since the last upload: * Team upload. [ Paul Tagliamonte ] * Use a secure transport for the Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser URL [ Roger Shimizu ] * debian/control: - Update Build-Depends on golang-check.v1-dev, in stead of golang-gocheck-dev which is already non-active upstream. - Use cgit URL for Vcs-Browser. * debian/patches: - Add a patch to use golang-check.v1-dev. - Add a patch to remove failure tests (Closes: #830446). Cheers, -- Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
Bug#854212: RFS: synergy/1.8.7-stable+dfsg.1-1 [ITA]
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 09:08:36AM +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > I'm doing a test build now. If all is fine, I will sponsor the upload. > > Keep in mind the stretch freeze. May the release team have any > comment/requirement regarding this package, please be responsive. Shouldn't this go into experimental? Otherwise, it will block uploading fixes for RC bugs to unstable. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#853903: RFS: scap-security-guide/0.1.31-6 [ITP] -- security guides and conformity checks using SCAP standard
Hi Gianfranco, Le 2017-02-02 18:13, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo control: forcemerge 853903 852415 Hello lets see a preliminary review: 1) one single changelog entry, targeting sid and initial release (Closes: #ITP) 2) debian/rules, lots of comented out noise, please remove 3) copyright not in dep-5 format, and some stuff is LGPL-2+ e.g. shared/transforms/pcidss/something some other is MIT (Ubuntu/16.04 some subdirs), something else CC-BY-SA, JQuery license, Public domain, GPL and probably something more 4) compat is now 10, please bump also debhelper to >=10 5) how do you use libopenscap8? dynamic loading or linking? if you link it, just build-depend on the -dev package and add shlibs:Depends to the runtime dependencies (avoiding nightmares on libopenscap8 SONAME changes) 6) quilt dependency is useless, and probably also some others, e.g. coreutils, part of Essentials packages (you can't remove it on a system) also probably sed and not sure about the others (to find them I usually try to remove them on my system) 7) ssg-base depends on libopenscap8 everything else depends on ssg-base, so transitively also against libopenscap8 making it useless to be replicated, right? 8) does not build twice in a row (not a real issue) 9) debian/ssg-base.prerm what??? 10) debian/README <--- useless? 11) debian/README.Debian might be made more aware of directories, e.g. /usr/share/ssg" might save some sed'ing before running the command, unless you want to change packagename in the near future Thank's for this reply. Here is the various updates/answers: 1) Exact, targeting sid only by now. 2) Corrected. No more noise in rules file 3) Corrected. All various upstream and debian files copyrights and licenses are defined properly in debian/copyright 4) Corrected. 5) libopenscap is used as a binary at build time (using oscap xccdf ... to generate guides and benchmarks). There is no link or dynamic loading. libopenscap is not a library but a binary tools suite (even if its name make it look like a lib :-) ) 6) Corrected. 7) Corrected. 8) Ok. I have to check why. I build through gbp and pbuilder so I didn't see this issue 9) Deleted that file. Waiting for upstream changelog instead of using inproper spec file. I've posted an issue in the upstream repository to have a real changelog file. 10) File deleted. 11) I've updated the file to be more explicit. Yet I think that it still need some more content. http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/scap-security-guide/0.1.31-6/buildlog since this is just some xml files that are needed by libopenscap8... what about suggesting this new package or merging it on that above tool? I don't undestand why the tool and the profiles have to be kept separate Why libopenscap8 & scap-workbench & scap-security-guide are separated: libopenscap8 is a set of tool using the SSG benchmarks to validate the current OS security policy in comparison with official ones such as PCI-DSS, NIST SP-800, ANSSI best practices, etc. Nevertheless, the following case exists: 1) Hosting security policy in a security server 2) Hosting libopenscap on various targets 3) Launching security policy validation on remote targets automatically using ansible, foreman, oscap-ssh or other to validate the policy of each remote host from a single policy server and aggregate the results In that case, the security policy server only hosts the security policies, not the libopenscap8. You will have something like that: https://www.theforeman.org/plugins/foreman_openscap/0.4/ I've updated the scap-security-guide package to set libopenscap as "Recommends" instead of Depends at runtime for all binary pacakges. All these updates have been made in the 0.31.1-8 release of the package: https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scap-security-guide/scap-security-guide_0.1.31-8.dsc Regards, -- Philippe THIERRY Doctor - Engineer RT and hardened Embedded Systems +33(0)6.64.16.97.30
Re: Packaging from Git
On 6 February 2017 at 12:25, Narcis Garciawrote: > Very far from the number of libs/tools that cannot unmask something like > Alexander Wirt formorer formorer de at anywhere of a page. > Probably this mentors mailing list isn't the right place for this discussion.
Re: Packaging from Git
__ I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't masked enough at this list's archives. Mailing lists service administrator should fix this. El 06/02/17 a les 11:16, Alexander Wirt ha escrit: > On Mon, 06 Feb 2017, Narcis Garcia wrote: > >> __ >> I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't >> masked enough at this list's archives. Mailing lists service >> administrator should fix this. >> El 06/02/17 a les 10:42, Alexander Wirt ha escrit: >>> On Mon, 06 Feb 2017, Narcis Garcia wrote: >>> __ I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't masked enough at this list's archives. Mailing lists service administrator should fix this. >>> We don't intend to. Debian is an open Distribution and we believe in being >>> able to be able to contact distributors and not to hide them. >>> >>> Alex - Debian Listmaster >>> >>> >> >> Mask and hide are two different measures. >> A simple masking example, without hiding any data: >> http://llista.gilug.org/pipermail/usuaris/2017-January/005484.html > I can show you a dozen libs that unmasks those things. > > Alex > > Very far from the number of libs/tools that cannot unmask something like Alexander Wirt formorer formorer de at anywhere of a page.
Re: Packaging from Git
On Mon, 06 Feb 2017, Narcis Garcia wrote: > __ > I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't > masked enough at this list's archives. Mailing lists service > administrator should fix this. > El 06/02/17 a les 10:42, Alexander Wirt ha escrit: > > On Mon, 06 Feb 2017, Narcis Garcia wrote: > > > >> __ > >> I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't > >> masked enough at this list's archives. Mailing lists service > >> administrator should fix this. > > We don't intend to. Debian is an open Distribution and we believe in being > > able to be able to contact distributors and not to hide them. > > > > Alex - Debian Listmaster > > > > > > Mask and hide are two different measures. > A simple masking example, without hiding any data: > http://llista.gilug.org/pipermail/usuaris/2017-January/005484.html I can show you a dozen libs that unmasks those things. Alex
Re: Packaging from Git
__ I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't masked enough at this list's archives. Mailing lists service administrator should fix this. El 06/02/17 a les 10:42, Alexander Wirt ha escrit: > On Mon, 06 Feb 2017, Narcis Garcia wrote: > >> __ >> I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't >> masked enough at this list's archives. Mailing lists service >> administrator should fix this. > We don't intend to. Debian is an open Distribution and we believe in being > able to be able to contact distributors and not to hide them. > > Alex - Debian Listmaster > > Mask and hide are two different measures. A simple masking example, without hiding any data: http://llista.gilug.org/pipermail/usuaris/2017-January/005484.html
Re: Packaging from Git
On Mon, 06 Feb 2017, Narcis Garcia wrote: > __ > I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't > masked enough at this list's archives. Mailing lists service > administrator should fix this. We don't intend to. Debian is an open Distribution and we believe in being able to be able to contact distributors and not to hide them. Alex - Debian Listmaster
Re: Packaging from Git
__ I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't masked enough at this list's archives. Mailing lists service administrator should fix this. El 05/02/17 a les 21:25, Gianfranco Costamagna ha escrit: > Hi, > > > >> You are expected to set that bit on the file and commit it. Gitlab has >> nothing to do with this. > > > stuff like github now allows to modify files and commit them from the web > interface > (without having to checkout the repo). > I'm not sure about gitlab interface, but I don't think you can chmod from the > web > interface > > G. > About executable attribute for files: I'm trying to use only FOSS, not Github. I'm currently not uploading files to Gitlab CMS through Git but I write them directly through the web interface and editor.
Bug#854212: RFS: synergy/1.8.7-stable+dfsg.1-1 [ITA]
On 6 February 2017 at 09:08, Arturo Borrero Gonzalezwrote: > > I'm doing a test build now. If all is fine, I will sponsor the upload. The package seems to FTBFS due to a failing test: [...] [--] Global test environment tear-down [==] 9 tests from 3 test cases ran. (2153 ms total) [ PASSED ] 8 tests. [ FAILED ] 1 test, listed below: [ FAILED ] ArchInternetTests.get 1 FAILED TEST debian/rules:94: recipe for target 'test' failed make: *** [test] Error 1 dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error exit status 2 [...] My complete build log here: http://termbin.com/mrib Please, fix and ping me.
Bug#854212: RFS: synergy/1.8.7-stable+dfsg.1-1 [ITA]
On 5 February 2017 at 07:12, Joshua Honeycuttwrote: > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/synergy/synergy_1.8.7-stable+dfsg.1-1.dsc > > More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com. > please review a bit more the template :-) I'm doing a test build now. If all is fine, I will sponsor the upload. Keep in mind the stretch freeze. May the release team have any comment/requirement regarding this package, please be responsive. thanks for taking care of this package :-)