Sigrok RFSs

2017-03-10 Thread Zoltan Gyarmati 
Dear Mentors,

at the beggining of the last week i submitted a couple of RFSs[1]
regarding to the packages related to the sigrok[2] suite and its updates
since the last version released to Debian.
 I'll be the first to admit that it's rather big pile of stuff to review
(we are talking about 6 source packages, also with soname upgrades and
so on), and i also know that most of the DD community is busy with
Stretch related tasks, but even then:
 what else (beside uploading the updated packages and file the RFSs) can
i do to ease the reviewing work and mainly to find a sponsor to provide
the certainly needed guidence?

@Uwe, i know you explitcly stated that it's unlikely that you have time
to review and packaging work, but do you have some time any chance to
comment the uploaded updates?

[1]
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856974
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856981
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856987
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856989
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857002
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857004

[2]
http://sigrok.org/

Thanks in advance, regards

-- 
Zoltan Gyarmati
https://zgyarmati.de



0x91F22561.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#856652: RFS: xpdf/3.04.real-5 [ITA]

2017-03-10 Thread Michael Gilbert 
Sean Whitton wrote:
> After the release of stretch, I intend to work on removing xpdf from the
> archive for the reason that it is unmaintainable, not because it depends
> on poppler.

Orphaning does not mean that a package is unmaintainable.  As I've
stated elsewhere I will continue to be willing to help, and that
includes if it doesn't get adopted, which is far preferable than the
dialog seen here so far.  It is up for adoption because I don't want
to be the only one responsible anymore.

Best wishes,
Mike

Bug#856652: RFS: xpdf/3.04.real-5 [ITA]

2017-03-10 Thread Michael Gilbert 
Svante Signell wrote:
> What else do you need? What are your problems with a _real_ upstream xpdf?

You don't seem to get what everyone is telling you.  If you are not
capable of or willing to maintain xpdf with the poppler backend, then
you should not be its maintainer.

If a non-popplerized xpdf does get uploaded, it will be removed from
the archive entirely since there will be no security support.

Speaking as the previous maintainer, who is actually still willing to help out.

Best wishes,
Mike

Bug#857131: RFS: fgrun/2016.4.0-0.1 [RC, NMU]

2017-03-10 Thread Sean Whitton 
control: tag -1 +wontfix

Dear Boyuan,

On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 06:53:47PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote:
>  fgrun (2016.4.0-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium
>  .
>* Non-maintainer upload.
>* New upstream release. (Closes: #839357)
>  - Drop patches applied upstream.
>  - Refresh patches.
>* Switch upstream to SourceForge.
>  - Update corresponding debian/watch file. (Closes: #851845)
>* Bump debhelper compat version to v10.
>* Apply "wrap-and-sort -abst".
>* Update Homepage information on SourceForge.

Most of these changes are not appropriate for an NMU, so I'm marking
this RFS as 'wontfix'.

Since Markus has got involved in this thread, perhaps you can organise a
team upload, and/or add Boyuan to the Uploaders: field.

> * This package has a longstanding unfixed RC bug (FTBFS) and fell out of
> Stretch release. With absolutely zero reverse dependency and migration 
> blocking, I believe fgrun should be able to enter unstable even though we are 
> in freeze now (because it wouldn't affect other packages or Stretch release 
> at 
> all).

Note that the release team's freeze policy does not allow this.

-- 
Sean Whitton


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#832941: RFS: 4pane

2017-03-10 Thread David Hart 
Dear Sean,

>Unfortunately, your watch file still isn't working:
>
>hephaestus ~/rfs/4pane-debian-dir % uscan --download-current-version
>uscan warn: In debian/watch no matching hrefs for version 4.0 in watch line
>  http://www.4Pane.co.uk/4pane-(.*)\.tar\.gz

Ah, I wasn't testing with --download-current-version.

I've uploaded a fix, and that option does now works here.

Regards,

David Hart

Bug#857350: RFS: groonga/7.0.0-1

2017-03-10 Thread Kentaro Hayashi 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "groonga"

* Package name: groonga
  Version : 7.0.0-1
  Upstream Author : Groonga Project 
* Url : http://groonga.org/
* Licenses: LGPL-2.1
  Section : database

It builds those binary packages:

  * groonga
  * groonga-server-common
  * groonga-server-gqtp
  * libgroonga-dev
  * libgroonga0
  * groonga-tokenizer-mecab
  * groonga-token-filter-stem
  * groonga-plugin-suggest
  * groonga-bin
  * groonga-httpd
  * groonga-doc
  * groonga-examples
  * groonga-munin-plugins

To access further information about this package, visit the following URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/groonga

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/groonga/groonga_7.0.0-1.dsc


More information about groonga can be obtained from
http://groonga.org/

Changes since last upload:

  * New upstream release.
  * debian/patches/fix-nginx-FTBFS-on-kfreebsd.patch
- Refresh patch to fix FTBFS on kFreeBSD.


pgpSXxWHYYGWF.pgp
Description: PGP signature