Bug#863010: RFS: golang-github-nebulouslabs-bolt/1.0+git20170131.0.ca9f208-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear Mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "golang-github-nebulouslabs-bolt" Cheers * Package name: golang-github-nebulouslabs-bolt Version : 1.0+git20170131.0.ca9f208-1 * URL : https://github.com/nebulouslabs/bolt * License : Expat Section : devel It builds those binary packages: golang-github-nebulouslabs-bolt-dev - low-level key/value database for Go To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/golang-github-nebulouslabs-bolt Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/golang-github-nebulouslabs-bolt/golang-github-nebulouslabs-bolt_1.0+git20170131.0.ca9f208-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * New upstream version Regards, Bjorn Dolk -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Bug#862991: marked as done (RFS: xtensor-python/0.12.1-1)
Your message dated Fri, 19 May 2017 18:11:16 + (UTC) with message-id <2015013731.2941002.1495217476...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#862991: RFS: xtensor-python/0.12.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #862991, regarding RFS: xtensor-python/0.12.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 862991: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862991 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the following package: * Package name: xtensor-python Version : 0.12.1-1 Upstream Author : Johan Mabille and Sylvain Corlay * URL : http://quantstack.net/xtensor * License : BSD Section : libs One can check out the package by visiting the following URL: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/xtensor-python.git Changes since the last upload: * New upstream version 0.12.1 * Rebase the patch queue * Depends on xtensor >= 0.10.2 * Mark xtensor-python-dev Multi-Arch: foreign * Do not build with -march=native - New patch No-march-native.patch Best regards, Ghis --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- done! G.--- End Message ---
Bug#862991: RFS: xtensor-python/0.12.1-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the following package: * Package name: xtensor-python Version : 0.12.1-1 Upstream Author : Johan Mabille and Sylvain Corlay * URL : http://quantstack.net/xtensor * License : BSD Section : libs One can check out the package by visiting the following URL: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/xtensor-python.git Changes since the last upload: * New upstream version 0.12.1 * Rebase the patch queue * Depends on xtensor >= 0.10.2 * Mark xtensor-python-dev Multi-Arch: foreign * Do not build with -march=native - New patch No-march-native.patch Best regards, Ghis
Bug#848416: closing RFS: pyvtk/0.5.18-1 [ITA]
Hi, >* Package the thing with this actual bug, but as far as I'm concerned I > consider it as grave, so I'm not really a fan of this idea. me neither >* Patch the issue myself, as a debian patch, and package the thing with it. unmaintainable on the long run >* Fork the project (it's BSD 2-Clause license), patch it, and provide it as> >a personnal work, with credit to the original author. if you want to fork, consider that this might be a lot time consuming G.
Bug#848416: closing RFS: pyvtk/0.5.18-1 [ITA]
Le vendredi 19 mai 2017 à 09:57:22+, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : > > Hi, > > >Since I had no news I got to do other things but I'm eager to > >fetch new version of the package if any and repackage it. > > > >Are you still interested in? > > > yes, if you still need the package! I theoretically do because it'd offer a basic vtk support in python3 that VTK currently do not provide (at least in debian). That said, I'm concerned regarding the current state of the project. As for an example, I submitted a bug report in december regarding issues for python3 support[1], and no answer came. I suspect that the author of the project moved to something else. I then have three solutions: * Package the thing with this actual bug, but as far as I'm concerned I consider it as grave, so I'm not really a fan of this idea. * Patch the issue myself, as a debian patch, and package the thing with it. * Fork the project (it's BSD 2-Clause license), patch it, and provide it as a personnal work, with credit to the original author. What do you think about this? Cheers, -- PEB [1] https://github.com/pearu/pyvtk/issues/10
Bug#848416: closing RFS: pyvtk/0.5.18-1 [ITA]
Hi, >Since I had no news I got to do other things but I'm eager to >fetch new version of the package if any and repackage it. > >Are you still interested in? yes, if you still need the package! G.
Bug#860206: RFS: sysbench
control: tag -1 +moreinfo Hello, Here is a review of 5a5d084bf540c903d4ea19f9761da2d6b38b3907: - It FTBFS. I've attached a log. - New file d/clean not mentioned in changelog. - Changelog typo "priastine-tar". - Did you run `wrap-and-sort`? It's conventional to say in the changelog that you ran it, giving the options you used, so someone else can run it with the same options if they do an NMU/etc. - I think that the "Manpage" section of the changelog could be clearer. You don't mention the new filename "manpage.txt", and you don't mention that you're now using txt2man (except in the d/control changes). - The patch header of 01_ could be enhanced with an explanation of why the third_party dir is included (I think I can guess, but it would be better explicitly stated) - Have you forwarded 02_ upstream? The DEP-3 patch header format can make this easier to indicate. - If you want to keep the "# you guessed :)" I think it would be best to use DEP-3's Description: field, otherwise it's not obvious why the comment line is there. - Patch 04_ definitely needs an explanation in the patch header as to why it's a good idea to strip it - Are you sure the upstream license is GPL-2, not GPL-2+? - src/xoroshiro128plus.h, m4/lib-ld.m4 missing from d/copyright An optional wishlist item: - crc32tbl.h is a generated file, and ideally it would be regenerated during the package build. If you're able to address the issues I've raised in this message, please remove the moreinfo tag in this bug, and don't forget to re-run `dch -r` to refresh the changelog timestamp. -- Sean Whitton sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.73.0 (23 Dec 2016) on zephyr.silentflame.com +==+ | sysbench 1.0.6+ds-1 (i386) Fri, 19 May 2017 06:58:44 + | +==+ Package: sysbench Version: 1.0.6+ds-1 Source Version: 1.0.6+ds-1 Distribution: experimental Machine Architecture: i386 Host Architecture: i386 Build Architecture: i386 Build Type: binary I: NOTICE: Log filtering will replace 'var/run/schroot/mount/unstable-i386-sbuild-afa975e8-4d29-4456-8230-88a7e11336b9' with '<>' +--+ | Update chroot| +--+ Get:1 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian unstable InRelease [237 kB] Get:2 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main Sources.diff/Index [27.9 kB] Get:3 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main i386 Packages.diff/Index [27.9 kB] Get:4 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main Sources 2017-05-18-0829.06.pdiff [2941 B] Get:5 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main Sources 2017-05-18-1430.00.pdiff [3398 B] Get:6 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main Sources 2017-05-18-2029.20.pdiff [3961 B] Get:7 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main Sources 2017-05-19-0229.06.pdiff [851 B] Get:7 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main Sources 2017-05-19-0229.06.pdiff [851 B] Get:8 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main i386 Packages 2017-05-18-0829.06.pdiff [4548 B] Get:9 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main i386 Packages 2017-05-18-1430.00.pdiff [1848 B] Get:10 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main i386 Packages 2017-05-18-2029.20.pdiff [2917 B] Get:11 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main i386 Packages 2017-05-19-0229.06.pdiff [33.9 kB] Get:11 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main i386 Packages 2017-05-19-0229.06.pdiff [33.9 kB] Fetched 347 kB in 4s (79.3 kB/s) Reading package lists... Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information... Calculating upgrade... The following packages will be upgraded: dpkg dpkg-dev libdpkg-perl 3 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 5009 kB of archives. After this operation, 105 kB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main i386 dpkg i386 1.18.24 [2134 kB] Get:2 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main i386 dpkg-dev all 1.18.24 [1592 kB] Get:3 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main i386 libdpkg-perl all 1.18.24 [1283 kB] debconf: delaying package configuration, since apt-utils is not installed Fetched 5009 kB in 4s (1079 kB/s) (Reading database ... (Reading database ... 5% (Reading database ... 10% (Reading database ... 15% (Reading database ... 20% (Reading database ... 25% (Reading database ... 30% (Reading database ... 35% (Reading database ... 40% (Reading database ... 45% (Reading database ... 50% (Reading database ... 55% (Reading database ... 60% (Reading database ... 65% (Reading
Bug#848416: closing RFS: pyvtk/0.5.18-1 [ITA]
Le lundi 08 mai 2017 à 12:57:08+0200, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : > control: reopen -1 > control: tags -1 moreinfo > control: owner -1 ! > > > Package pyvtk has been removed from mentors. > > > > I would like to sponsor this package, any news? Hey, Since I had no news I got to do other things but I'm eager to fetch new version of the package if any and repackage it. Are you still interested in? Cheers, -- PEB signature.asc Description: PGP signature