Re: package pynmea2
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:13:55PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote: > There was a ITP-RFS for pynmea2. But python-nmea2 already > exists. > > https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python-nmea2.html > > I asked the contributor (2017-11-12) to close the bugs with > an n-d...@bugs.debian.org but he sent -cl...@bugs.debian.org > to ITP only. RFS still open. > Today I received an email saying that pynmea2 was accepted. It > already has a page: > > https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pynmea2.html > > > What to do ? Ask FTP-Master to remove the package ? Yeah, although it's good to contact the maintainer first. I've done so by a RC bug: #881763 (duplicate package, undeclared file conflict). This way we won't need to dig potential rdeps someone may upload tomorrow out of testing. Have you talked to the ftpmasters already? Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Laws we want back: Poland, Dz.U. 1921 nr.30 poz.177 (also Dz.U. ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ 1920 nr.11 poz.61): Art.2: An official, guilty of accepting a gift ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ or another material benefit, or a promise thereof, [in matters ⠈⠳⣄ relevant to duties], shall be punished by death by shooting.
Bug#881762: ITA: gtkterm/0.99.7~rc1-1
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:19:27PM +0100, Willem van den Akker wrote: > * Package name: gtkterm > Version : 0.99.7~rc1-1 > Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] > * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] > * License : [fill in] > Section : comm > > Changes since the last upload: > > * New maintainer upload (Closes: #857476). > * debian/control > - description updated conform Developer's Reference. > * Bump standards version to 4.1.1.1. > Remarks: > Homepage, watch file are not known yet. gtkterm has many, often > inactive, respositories. I am in contact with a few owners to take > over the most recent respository. After that a new release and > homepage/watch file are filled in. > Also one file serie.c is modified other then the 'quilt-way'. This will > be corrected after a new version upload. I don't see any changes other than removal of an article from the short desc and removal of the Homepage: field. Thus, this upload would serve no other purpose than to stake your claim. This can be done just by mentioning in the ITA bug. I'd refrain from uploading until there are some actual changes. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Laws we want back: Poland, Dz.U. 1921 nr.30 poz.177 (also Dz.U. ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ 1920 nr.11 poz.61): Art.2: An official, guilty of accepting a gift ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ or another material benefit, or a promise thereof, [in matters ⠈⠳⣄ relevant to duties], shall be punished by death by shooting.
Bug#881762: ITA: gtkterm/0.99.7~rc1-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gtkterm" * Package name: gtkterm Version : 0.99.7~rc1-1 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] * License : [fill in] Section : comm It builds those binary packages: gtkterm- simple GTK+ serial port terminal To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/gtkterm Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gtkterm/gtkte rm_0.99.7~rc1-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * New maintainer upload (Closes: #857476). * debian/control - description updated conform Developer's Reference. * Bump standards version to 4.1.1.1. Remarks: Homepage, watch file are not known yet. gtkterm has many, often inactive, respositories. I am in contact with a few owners to take over the most recent respository. After that a new release and homepage/watch file are filled in. Also one file serie.c is modified other then the 'quilt-way'. This will be corrected after a new version upload. Regards, W. van den Akker
Re: package pynmea2
Hi Geert Stappers, > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:13:55PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote: >> Hi, >> >> There was a ITP-RFS for pynmea2. >> But python-nmea2 already exists. >> >> https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python-nmea2.html >> >> I asked the contributor (2017-11-12) to close the bugs with >> an n-d...@bugs.debian.org but he sent -cl...@bugs.debian.org >> to ITP only. > > Bug Tracking System URL is > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=870906#64 > > >> RFS still open. >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=871468 > > Meanwhile closed. > > >> Today I received an email saying that pynmea2 was accepted. It >> already has a page: >> >> https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pynmea2.html >> >> >> What to do ? Ask FTP-Master to remove the package ? >> > > Provide more information. > > Make this table complete, fill in the dots > upstream | debian_source | builds binary -+--+ . | ... | python-pynmea2 Tom Flanagan | https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pynmea2.html | python3-pynmea2 Only Python 3 was builded Regards, Herbert
Re: package pynmea2
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:13:55PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote: > Hi, > > There was a ITP-RFS for pynmea2. > But python-nmea2 already exists. > > https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python-nmea2.html > > I asked the contributor (2017-11-12) to close the bugs with > an n-d...@bugs.debian.org but he sent -cl...@bugs.debian.org > to ITP only. Bug Tracking System URL is https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=870906#64 > RFS still open. > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=871468 Meanwhile closed. > Today I received an email saying that pynmea2 was accepted. It > already has a page: > > https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pynmea2.html > > > What to do ? Ask FTP-Master to remove the package ? > Provide more information. Make this table complete, fill in the dots upstream | debian_source | builds binary -+--+ . | ... | python-pynmea2 . | https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pynmea2.html | python3-pynmea2 Groeten Geert Stappers -- Leven en laten leven
Bug#858155: marked as done (RFS: stenc/1.0.7-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Tue, 14 Nov 2017 16:26:00 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: stenc/1.0.7-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #858155, regarding RFS: stenc/1.0.7-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 858155: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=858155 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "stenc" * Package name: stenc Version : 1.0.7-1 Upstream Author : John Coleman * URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/stenc/ * License : GPLv2 Section : admin It builds those binary packages: stenc - SCSI Tape Encryption Manager To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/stenc Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/stenc/stenc_1.0.7-1.dsc More information about stenc can be obtained from https://sourceforge.net/projects/stenc/ At the moment Debian is missing a tool which would alow users to utilise hardware encryption in their tape drives. Stenc manages encryption on capable LTO tape drives with hardware-based encryption. Program should work on any other SSP capable tape drives. Built specifically for Linux and AIX. Now supports key change auditing and key descriptors (uKAD). I have been using this tool with LTO-6 drive for some time and I think Debian would benefit from having it packaged. Regards, Denys Berkovskyy--- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package stenc version 1.0.7-1 is in unstable now. https://packages.qa.debian.org/stenc--- End Message ---
Bug#871468: marked as done (RFS: pynmea2/1.9.0-1 [ITP] -- pynmea2 is a Python library for the NMEA 0183 protocol)
Your message dated Tue, 14 Nov 2017 16:26:01 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: pynmea2/1.9.0-1 [ITP] -- pynmea2 is a Python library for the NMEA 0183 protocol has caused the Debian Bug report #871468, regarding RFS: pynmea2/1.9.0-1 [ITP] -- pynmea2 is a Python library for the NMEA 0183 protocol to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 871468: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=871468 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pynmea2" * Package name: pynmea2 Version: 1.8.0-4 Upstream Author: Tom Flanagan * URL: https://github.com/Knio/pynmea2 * License: MIT Section: python It builds those binary packages: python-pynmea2 - pynmea2 is a Python library for the NMEA 0183 protocol python3-pynmea2 - pynmea2 is a Python3 library for the NMEA 0183 protocol To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/pynmea2 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pynmea2/pynmea2_1.8.0-4.dsc More information about pynmea2 can be obtained from https://github.com/Knio/pynmea2. Changes since the last upload: * Fixed lintian errors * duplicate-short-description, * vcs-field-uses-insecure-uri, * capitalization-error-in-description-synopsis * ancient-standards-version * Fixed Vcs urls Regards, Joachim Langenbach --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package pynmea2 version 1.9.0-1 is in unstable now. https://packages.qa.debian.org/pynmea2--- End Message ---
Re: How to determine the filename for dlopen()
Christian Seiler writes: > Am 2017-11-13 13:23, schrieb wf...@niif.hu: > >> I'm packaging a program which wants to dlopen() some library. It finds >> this library via pkg-config (PKG_CHECK_MODULES). How to best determine >> the filename to use in the dlopen() call? It should work cross-distro, >> for cross-compilation and whatnot. Is it always safe to use the SONAME >> as the filename? > > The SONAME is the right thing to do here, as that is what's encoded in > the DT_NEEDED field by the linker. > >> I'm currently considering something like >> >> ld -shared -o dummy.so $(my_LIBS) >> objdump -p dummy.so | fgrep NEEDED > > That might work, but I'm not sure that's very stable. Hi Christian, The main problem with this is that my_LIBS as set by PKG_CHECK_MODULES may contain multiple libraries, and nothing guarantees that I need the first one. But there's probably no cure for that. And it failed badly on FreeBSD for some reason... So now I need a BSD machine to log on. > find_library(PNG_LIBRARY_FILE NAMES png) Yes, finding the library is what I wanted to offload to ld. It's somewhat hairy to scan the library path, or at least I haven't found the appropriate tool. > Important: [Lots of interesting stuff, thanks!] > - If you do manage to write some relatively generic code, I would >urge you to contribute that to CMake as a macro, so that other >people could also profit from it. That probably won't happen in the near future, as I've never used CMake, just tried to parse your code based on English and common sense. :) -- Regards, Feri
package pynmea2
Hi, There was a ITP-RFS for pynmea2. But python-nmea2 already exists. https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python-nmea2.html I asked the contributor (2017-11-12) to close the bugs with an n-d...@bugs.debian.org but he sent -cl...@bugs.debian.org to ITP only. RFS still open. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=871468 Today I received an email saying that pynmea2 was accepted. It already has a page: https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pynmea2.html What to do ? Ask FTP-Master to remove the package ? Regards, Herbert
Re: source package upload fail? Bug - #859130 ITP: lina -- iso- Forth interpreter
>Sorry to have bothered you. All answers are in >https://mentors.debian.net/qa I'm quite busy right now, good luck with mentors uploads :) G.
Re: ZFS packaging
>Would it be possible to have someone look over the changes I've made >and/or make suggestions as to how I could get these changes incorporated >into Debian? it is usually better to open wishlist bugs for improvements (with patches) and then in case open an RFS bug. Looks the new release is already uploaded, not sure if anything is still missing from your packaging wrt the upload one, feel free to contact the maintainers again in case or open bugs. G.
Bug#880049: marked as done (RFS: btrfs-progs/4.13.3-1~bpo9+1 [continuing to update the bpo])
Your message dated Tue, 14 Nov 2017 13:24:09 + (UTC) with message-id <124788531.3381894.1510665849...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#880049: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.13.3-1~bpo9+1 [continuing to update the bpo] has caused the Debian Bug report #880049, regarding RFS: btrfs-progs/4.13.3-1~bpo9+1 [continuing to update the bpo] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 880049: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=880049 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my bpo of "btrfs-progs". I skipped 4.12-1 because it had a lintian BCP-78 (non DFSG) error; this was resolved upstream during the 4.13.x cycle. Please upload to delayed to give Axel Burri time to resolve #878926 "Btrbk (>=0.26.0) bpo needed for users of stretch-backports). Summary: btrfs-progs changed subvolume list format breaking btrck's parsing, but I'm not sure how many of btrbk's 129 users (popcon installed) are using stretch-backports. * Package name: btrfs-progs Version : 4.13.3-1~bpo9+1 Upstream Author : linux-bt...@vger.kernel.org * URL : http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/ * License : GPL-2 Section : admin It builds these binary packages: btrfs-progs - Checksumming Copy on Write Filesystem utilities btrfs-progs-udeb - Checksumming Copy on Write Filesystem utilities (udeb) (udeb) btrfs-tools - transitional dummy package To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/btrfs-progs Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/btrfs-progs/btrfs-progs_4.13.3-1~bpo9+1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/ Changes since the last upload: btrfs-progs (4.13.3-1~bpo9+1) stretch-backports; urgency=medium * Rebuild for stretch-backports. -- Nicholas D Steeves Tue, 24 Oct 2017 09:43:07 -0400 btrfs-progs (4.13.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium [ Dimitri John Ledkov ] * New upstream release. * Add breaks against incompatible btrbk. Closes: #872836 * Use noawait trigger variant, updating initramfs is optional, and doesn't relly matter when it happens, as long as it does, eventually. [ Nicholas D Steeves ] * Add copyright for tests/sha.h tests/sha224-256.c tests/sha-private.h * Drop dh-autoreconf from build-depends, because it's automatic now. -- Dimitri John Ledkov Wed, 18 Oct 2017 13:15:37 +0100 btrfs-progs (4.12-1) unstable; urgency=medium [ Dimitri John Ledkov ] * New upstream release. * Update watch file to v4. [ Nicholas D Steeves ] * Override dh_auto_clean to work around upstream bug where make clean cannot be run before ./configure * Drop btrfs-convert (Closes: #824895, #854489) * Update Source, because Chris Mason's branch hasn't been updated since v4.4 * 4.6.1-1 did not fix package license Btrfs-progs is explicitly GPL2 and not GPL2+. * Update copyright for new locations of: radix-tree.c and radix-tree.h * d/control: add whitespace (cosmetic fix) * Switch to debhelper 10 and automatically generated -dbgsym package -- Dimitri John Ledkov Mon, 31 Jul 2017 15:18:39 +0100 btrfs-progs (4.9.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium [ Dimitri John Ledkov ] * New upstream release Closes: #849353, #817806, #854915, #845473 * Use dh addon for bash completion (--with bash-completion) * Suggest duperemove Closes: #703169 [ Hideki Yamane ] * debian/control - add Build-Depends: bash-completion to use dh_bash-completion * debian/rules - call dh_bash-completion * add debian/btrfs-progs.bash-completion Closes: #840302, #800790. [ Helmut Grohne ] * Fix FTCBFS: cross.patch: Indirect pkg-config invocations through $PKG_CONFIG and autoreconf (Closes: #845816) -- Dimitri John Ledkov Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:45:42 + Regards, Nicholas D Steeves --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hello, > I am looking for a sponsor for my bpo of "btrfs-progs". different tarball (gz instead of xz) is bad! uploaded, please ping in case it doesn't reach the archive G.--- End Message ---
Bug#880443: marked as done (RFS: spyder-reports/0.1.1-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Tue, 14 Nov 2017 12:38:05 + with message-id <0f1add24-c3b5-e01a-d2d3-9172f90ae...@visulytix.com> and subject line uploaded to unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #880443, regarding RFS: spyder-reports/0.1.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 880443: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=880443 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the following package: * Package name: spyder-reports Version : 0.1.1-1 Upstream Author : Spyder Project Contributors * URL : https://github.com/spyder-ide/spyder-reports * License : Expat Section : python Please check out the package by visiting the following URL: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/spyder-reports.git Changes since the last upload: * Initial release. (Closes: #872534) Regards, Ghis --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- --- End Message ---
