Bug#849754: RFS: guerillabackup/0.0.0-1
Hello Gianfranco, Gianfranco Costamagna writes: > control: owner -1 ! > control: tags -1 moreinfo > Hello, > > >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "guerillabackup" > > I would really like to see the package working, but I see the > upstream repo is lacking the history, this makes the Debian > work less efficient in cherrypicking new stuff. > Two commits are really not that much, seems like an inactive project. Well, one commit (the first one is the github creation commit). The software is the Python2 port of a quite old project, so just rewriting it, comparing result with old program by unit tests and committing the result to github resulted in a single commit. All other changes are from the request to transform it to Python3 (some earlier review), fixes for problems introduced by that changes, which were then added as a diff for packaging the initial release version If it would help, I could move those changes from my local branch (which is used to create the patches for the Debian package by comparing it to the github trunk) also to the github trunk. This would then create a new github trunk (upstream) version, thus starting a new RFS process I guess (due to version change). Then there would also be more upstream commits. > Is it the case? Yes and no: it is working on all my machines without any flaws or major changes for more than a year or so now and as long as I do not change my setup to expose new bugs (which I do not plan to do) or someone else reports bugs from his setup (which would require solid packaging to have new users), so long there is no real need for further development. While the RFS was running, all changes went to the Debian packaging repository and now the new salsa repository, which should build the package using "gbp", hence also no upstream changes. But I did not manage to get gbp running from the documentation, e.g. trying the following did not work out and the various (sometimes contradictory) recommendations from IRC did not really improve the situation. You can test with: git clone https://salsa.debian.org/halfdog-guest/guerillabackup.git cd guerillabackup git config user.email "m...@halfdog.net" git config user.name "halfdog" gbp buildpackage So I stopped trying with salsa/gbp. Maybe in some years when alioth/ salsa transition has progressed, documentation will be more conclusive for packaging noobs and make that step easier. > Please note: I maintain borgbackup, that I think is really more > powerful (complete) than your tool (please have a look at it). Now I had time to check that one out. If I understand correctly, it could be a nice preprocessor for the guerillabackup: * borgbackup: does local file deduplication, uses nearby storages (similar trust zone, high bandwidth, reliable connections) to create repository with or without symmetric encryption * guerillabackup: performs assymetric encryption of borgbackup outputs (e.g. the borgbackup repositories or changesets exported from the repository), distribution of redundant copies of those outputs to remote cloud storage with lower trust (other trust zones, low bandwith, unreliable connections) hd
Bug#892579: marked as done (RFS: runit/2.1.2-10 )
Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:20:56 + with message-idand subject line closing RFS: runit/2.1.2-10 has caused the Debian Bug report #892579, regarding RFS: runit/2.1.2-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 892579: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892579 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "runit" * Package name : runit Version : 2.1.2-10 Upstream Author : Gerrit Pape * Url : http://smarden.org/runit/ * Licenses : BSD-3-clause Programming Lang : Section : admin runit is a collection of tools to provide system-wide service supervision and to manage services. Contrary to sysv init, it not only cares about starting and stopping services, but also supervises the service daemons while they are running. Amongst other things, it provides a reliable interface to send signals to service daemons without the need for pid-files, and a log facility with automatic log file rotation and disk space limits. . runit service supervision can run under sysv init or replace the init system completely. Complete init replacement provided by 'runit-init' package. It builds those binary packages: * runit * runit-systemd * runit-sysv * getty-run * runit-init This package succesfully builds on debomatic machine: https://debomatic-i386.debian.net/distribution#unstable/runit/2.1.2-10 Please note, that package is maintained with dgit(1) tool using dgit-maint-merge(7) workflow. For more information about how to sponsor this package, see dgit-sponsorship(7). Git repository: https://salsa.debian.org/runit-team/runit.git Git branch: master With /bin/sh following commands should suffice: $ git clone https://salsa.debian.org/runit-team/runit.git runit $ cd runit $ make -f debian/rules get-orig-source # 'gbp buildpackage' is fine $ dgit sbuild Changes since last upload: * Replace DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS with DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS, since the former is meant for user, rebuilding package and overrides the latter. + Thanks: Gianfranco Costamagna * Add 'runscript' program into 'runit' binary package, intended to simplify for system administrator management of per-user 'runsvdir' processes. * Incorporate NMU. Bring back runit-init package. * Add compiler flags for large file support. * Add support for sysvinit control pipe into shutdown script, solving issue with reboot just after runit-init installation. (Closes: #861536) * Add dependency on initscripts. While initscripts probably could be simplified, right now it is simpler to rely on it to make sure, that transition from sysvinit is smooth. On other hand, if both runscript and initscript are present, runscript is favored. * Write CFLAGS and LDFLAGS into conf-ld/conf-cc. Without it, upstream build system strips binaries, wasting precious debug information that must be stored in -dbg symbols. * Check for executable bit on /run/runit.reboot with stat(1), not test(1). If /run is mounted with 'noexec' option, test(1) gives unexpected results. * Reduce timeout between SIGTERM and SIGKILL on system shutdown. Default 7 seconds is reasonable for well-behaving program, and waiting longer does not help with programs, which ignore SIGTERM, like startx(1) in some configurations. * Fix problem with bash completion script when ls(1) output color control sequences. * Update Vcs-* fields in debian/control. Now on GitLab instance at salsa.debian.org * Bump compat version to 11, rendering dh-sysuser unneeded. * Drop explicit --parallel from debian/rules, since it is default since debhelper-10. * Use secure URL when referencing to debian/copyright format. * Bump standards version to 4.1.3 (removed priority 'extra') * Remove version conflicts on sysvinit, since it is no longer present in Archives. Regards, Dmitry Bogatov --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package runit version 2.1.2-10 is in unstable now. https://packages.qa.debian.org/runit--- End Message ---
Bug#882840: marked as done (RFS: jpeces/4.2.1-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2018 17:30:24 +0200 with message-id <20180411173024.28808...@debian.debian.org> and subject line RFS: jpeces/4.2.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #882840, regarding RFS: jpeces/4.2.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 882840: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882840 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jpeces" * Package name: jpeces Version : 4.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Innocent De Marchi* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/pecesjocdetangr/ * License : GPL-2+ Section : games It builds those binary packages: jpeces - Xinese Tangram puzzle and others To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/jpeces Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jpeces/jpeces_4.2.1-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: #882771). Regards, Innocent De Marchi --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, There are several aspects of this package that need improvement: I withdraw this RFS while I proceed to make the necessary improvements. Thanks! I. De Marchi--- End Message ---
Bug#895262: marked as done (RFS: deepin-menu/3.3.2-1)
On Wed 04/11 13:15, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > I mean, you're extremely polite, to the point that some people might take a > feeling they're being mocked. Like "such detailed information" for a > request of a single line of documentation. > > I've seen this in other Chinese folks, it looks like it's the way you talk. > But for those unaccustomed, it's a culture clash. I don't mean it T^T. -- Yanhao Mo signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#895431: marked as done (RFS: libhinawa/0.9.0-1)
Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2018 15:20:25 +0200 with message-id <20180411132025.hwuvhrrnwxbme...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#895431: RFS: libhinawa/0.9.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #895431, regarding RFS: libhinawa/0.9.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 895431: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895431 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libhinawa" * Package name: libhinawa Version : 0.9.0-1 Upstream Author : Takashi Sakamoto* URL : https://github.com/takaswie/libhinawa * License : LGPL-2.1 Section : libs It builds those binary packages: gir1.2-hinawa-1.0 - GObjet introspection data for libhinawa0 libhinawa-dev - I/O library for IEEE 1394 asynchronous transactions (development libhinawa0 - I/O library for IEEE 1394 asynchronous transactions To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/libhinawa Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libh/libhinawa/libhinawa_0.9.0-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from https://github.com/takaswie/libhinawa Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release 0.9.0. * debian/control - Bump standard version to 4.1.4. No other changes are required. pgpFv7Dvgs1W3.pgp Description: PGP signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:05:00PM +0900, Kentaro Hayashi wrote: > * Package name: libhinawa >Version : 0.9.0-1 > * New upstream release 0.9.0. > * debian/control > - Bump standard version to 4.1.4. No other changes are required. ✓ -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ ... what's the frequency of that 5V DC? ⠈⠳⣄--- End Message ---
Bug#895262: marked as done (RFS: deepin-menu/3.3.2-1)
Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2018 15:13:31 +0200 with message-id <20180411131331.mwo6msbh4rayi...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#895262: RFS: deepin-menu/3.3.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #895262, regarding RFS: deepin-menu/3.3.2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 895262: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895262 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "deepin-menu" * Package name: deepin-menu Version : 3.3.2-1 Upstream Author : Deepin Technology Co., Ltd. * URL : https://github.com/linuxdeepin/deepin-menu * License : GPL-3+ Section : x11 It builds those binary packages: deepin-menu - Deepin menu service To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/deepin-menu Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/deepin-menu/deepin-menu_3.3.2-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-deepin-team/deepin-menu Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release. * d/control: add new uploader Yanhao Mo* d/control: Use Salsa platform for Vcs field. * debian/control: Update Standers-Version to 4.1.4. * debian/compat: Switch compat to level 11. -- Yanhao Mo signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 08:44:34PM +0800, Yanhao Mo wrote: > On Tue 04/10 23:19, Adam Borowski wrote: > > Hi! > > I see that the packaging no longer installs autostart parts: > > > > It's a non-obvious packaging change that would be nice to be described in > > the changelog. > > > > On the other hand, DDE wasn't a part of Stretch (so not many users yet), and > > for your internal purposes, it's in git: > > https://github.com/linuxdeepin/deepin-menu/commit/09e65bd7bd46c9aa6cdd1b205aa4e4f7be33ef0c > > Speaking about nitpicks in the changelog: s/Standers/Standards/. > > Hi Adam, > Thanks for pointing that and give such detailed information. I have > fixed that two issues and re-uploaded. Uploaded. > > so if you feel like I'm nitpicking too much, please tell me so, I can upload > > as-is. > Ok, I'll let you know if I have that feeling, haven't at least for now ◕‿◕. I mean, you're extremely polite, to the point that some people might take a feeling they're being mocked. Like "such detailed information" for a request of a single line of documentation. I've seen this in other Chinese folks, it looks like it's the way you talk. But for those unaccustomed, it's a culture clash. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ ... what's the frequency of that 5V DC? ⠈⠳⣄--- End Message ---
Bug#895431: RFS: libhinawa/0.9.0-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libhinawa" * Package name: libhinawa Version : 0.9.0-1 Upstream Author : Takashi Sakamoto* URL : https://github.com/takaswie/libhinawa * License : LGPL-2.1 Section : libs It builds those binary packages: gir1.2-hinawa-1.0 - GObjet introspection data for libhinawa0 libhinawa-dev - I/O library for IEEE 1394 asynchronous transactions (development libhinawa0 - I/O library for IEEE 1394 asynchronous transactions To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/libhinawa Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libh/libhinawa/libhinawa_0.9.0-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from https://github.com/takaswie/libhinawa Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release 0.9.0. * debian/control - Bump standard version to 4.1.4. No other changes are required. pgpIX3lgCnBZQ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#895262: RFS: deepin-menu/3.3.2-1
On Tue 04/10 23:19, Adam Borowski wrote: > > Hi! > I see that the packaging no longer installs autostart parts: > > --- deepin-menu-3.2.0/debian/install2017-08-11 15:49:21.0 +0200 > +++ deepin-menu-3.3.2/debian/install1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 > @@ -1,2 +0,0 @@ > -data/com.deepin.menu.service /usr/share/dbus-1/services/ > -deepin-menu.desktop /etc/xdg/autostart/ > > Files in first .deb but not in second > - > -rw-r--r-- root/root /etc/xdg/autostart/deepin-menu.desktop > -rw-r--r-- root/root DEBIAN/conffiles > > It's a non-obvious packaging change that would be nice to be described in > the changelog. > > On the other hand, DDE wasn't a part of Stretch (so not many users yet), and > for your internal purposes, it's in git: > https://github.com/linuxdeepin/deepin-menu/commit/09e65bd7bd46c9aa6cdd1b205aa4e4f7be33ef0c > Speaking about nitpicks in the changelog: s/Standers/Standards/. > > Thanks for your work! > Hi Adam, Thanks for pointing that and give such detailed information. I have fixed that two issues and re-uploaded. > so if you feel like I'm nitpicking too much, please tell me so, I can upload > as-is. Ok, I'll let you know if I have that feeling, haven't at least for now ◕‿◕. -- Yanhao Mo signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#895354: marked as done (RFS: ddnet/11.1.3-1)
Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2018 12:28:39 +0200 with message-id <20180411102839.56que6tnlyry2...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#895354: RFS: ddnet/11.1.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #895354, regarding RFS: ddnet/11.1.3-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 895354: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895354 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ddnet" * Package name: ddnet Version : 11.1.3-1 Upstream Author : Dennis Felsing * URL : http://ddnet.tw/ * License : zlib (code), CC-BY-SA 3.0 (data) Section : games It builds those binary packages: ddnet - Teeworlds modification with a unique cooperative gameplay ddnet-data - Data for DDNet ddnet-server - Server for DDNet ddnet-tools - Tools for DDNet To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/ddnet Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/ddnet/ddnet_11.1.3-1.dsc Regards, Yangfl --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 02:23:50PM +0800, Yangfl wrote: > Sorry for missing build-dep. Reuploaded. Uploaded, thanks for the update. I see two broken symlinks: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 47 Apr 9 04:55 DejavuWenQuanYiMicroHei.ttf -> ../../../../fonts/truetype/wqy/wqy-microhei.ttc lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 86 Apr 9 04:55 Icons.ttf -> ../../../../fonts/truetype/materialdesignicons-webfont/materialdesignicons-webfont.ttf (and fonts-dejavu-core would be third, had I it not installed) Somehow you have those only as Recommends. Upon running the client, I see a few broken icons in the upper right corner. Being a Recommends rather than entirely missing, I see you considered these parts (thus I uploaded this version as-is), but I wonder what's the reason for skipping a hard dependency. Are these supposed to be replaced by an user somehow? None of these fonts takes an amount of space that would be noticeable on a machine big enough to play such games, thus I'm somehow missing the reason for making the dependency weak. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ ... what's the frequency of that 5V DC? ⠈⠳⣄--- End Message ---
Bug#895354: RFS: ddnet/11.1.3-1
Sorry for missing build-dep. Reuploaded. 2018-04-11 5:42 GMT+08:00 Adam Borowski: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 08:13:10PM +0800, Yangfl wrote: >> * Package name: ddnet >>Version : 11.1.3-1 > >> It builds those binary packages: >> >> ddnet - Teeworlds modification with a unique cooperative gameplay >> ddnet-data - Data for DDNet >> ddnet-server - Server for DDNet >> ddnet-tools - Tools for DDNet > >> dget -x >> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/ddnet/ddnet_11.1.3-1.dsc > > --- ddnet-11.0.3/debian/changelog 2018-02-14 09:49:07.0 +0100 > +++ ddnet-11.1.3/debian/changelog 2018-04-09 04:55:12.0 +0200 > @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ > +ddnet (11.1.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium > + > + * New upstream release > + * Move data location to usr/share/games/ddnet/data/ > + * Update copyright > + * Bump Standards-Version to 4.1.4 > + * Move Vcs to Team repo > + > + -- Yangfl Mon, 09 Apr 2018 10:55:12 +0800 > > I'm afraid that it fails to build, saying something about websockets. > Tried on amd64 and armhf, log attached. > > > 喵! > -- > ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ > ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ > ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ ... what's the frequency of that 5V DC? > ⠈⠳⣄