Bug#900456: RFS: libtoxcore/0.2.2-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libtoxcore" * Package name: libtoxcore Version : 0.2.2-1 Upstream Author : Tox Project * URL : https://tox.chat * License : GPL-3+ Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libtoxcore-dev - Distributed, secure messenger - development headers libtoxcore2 - Distributed, secure messenger To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://salsa.debian.org/yangfl-guest/c-toxcore Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release * Fix FTBFS on hurd-i386 * Disable buggy autotest Regards, Yangfl
Bug#899347: [pkg-go] Bug#899347: RFS: golang-github-howeyc-fsnotify/0.9.0-1 [ITP]
On Thu 05/31 11:05, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > Hi, > > I uploaded, it's in NEW queue. > > Best regards, > Nobuhiro Thanks a lot ~ -- Yanhao Mo signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#899347: [pkg-go] Bug#899347: RFS: golang-github-howeyc-fsnotify/0.9.0-1 [ITP]
Hi,
I uploaded, it's in NEW queue.
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
2018-05-23 15:03 GMT+09:00 Yanhao Mo :
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
> X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Control: close 895197
> Control: block 895173
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "golang-github-howeyc-fsnotify"
>
> * Package name: golang-github-howeyc-fsnotify
> Version : 0.9.0+git20151003.f0c08ee-1
> Upstream Author : Chris Howey
> * URL : https://github.com/howeyc/fsnotify
> * License : BSD-3-clause
> Section : devel
>
> It builds those binary packages:
>
> golang-github-howeyc-fsnotify-dev - file system notification for Go
>
> To access further information about this package, please visit the following
> URL:
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/golang-github-howeyc-fsnotify
>
> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
>
> dget -x
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/golang-github-howeyc-fsnotify/golang-github-howeyc-fsnotify_0.9.0+git20151003.f0c08ee-1.dsc
>
>
> More information about hello can be obtained from
> https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-howeyc-fsnotify
>
> --
> Yanhao Mo
>
> ___
> Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
> pkg-go-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
Bug#900453: RFS: deepin-notifications/3.3.1-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "deepin-notifications" * Package name: deepin-notifications Version : 3.3.1-1 Upstream Author : Deepin Technology Co., Ltd. * URL : https://github.com/linuxdeepin/deepin-notifications * License : GPL-3+ Section : x11 It builds those binary packages: deepin-notifications - System notifications for Deepin Desktop Environment To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/deepin-notifications Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/deepin-notifications/deepin-notifications_3.3.1-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-deepin-team/deepin-notifications Changes since the last upload: deepin-notifications (3.3.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream version 3.3.1 -- Yanhao Mo Thu, 31 May 2018 08:15:26 +0800 -- Yanhao Mo signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#888859: RFS: iolang/2017.09.06+dfsg-1 [ITP]
control: tags -1 +morefino On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:05:41AM +0800, Yangfl wrote: > > d/copyright should have provided a list of removed files (see Files-Excluded). > > By the way, I have made a PR to upstream to remove ConvertUTF and it > has accepted. The next release will not affected by this. Sounds good. > Added deps on libjs-jquery. Source of jquery.js is now provided. > > Also move Flux resource files to /usr/share/ . As discussed previously, there are several issues remained to be solved before the next round of review: 1. A packaging repo. This is a complicated package, with a proper packaging repo it will be easier to track the changes. 2. Add the upstream correctness tests to the dh_auto_test target. I believe this is necessary because it's a language package. Any unit test failure may trigger unexpected potential problems. 3. Your effort is appreciated. However, as previously discussed, you should make sure whether you would be interested in this package for a while. As you said, you don't quite use this package. I guess it's hard for one to keep interest on a package he/she doesn't care about. thanks.
Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]
Hello, Thank for your review. 2018-05-25 9:31 GMT+03:00 Lumin : > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 07:50:57PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have updated odp & odp-dpdk packages on mentors.d.n. > > Please file another RFS bug for the odp-dpdk package since it is a > different source. Sure, filled #900407. >> 2018-05-06 3:56 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov : >> > I will make my next upload use alternatives, thank you. >> >> This upload uses alternatives to select ODP library to be used. > > The package is going in the right way, but the alternatives still needs > to be improved. Thanks. I've updated -dev packages to also use alternatives. > Nitpickings about the updated package: > > 1. README.Debian >"Library packages should contain libodp-linux.so.FOO" >It should be "libodp-linux.so.SOVER", which is more precise. Hmm. I have checked buster package lists. Only blas/lapack packages use soname as virtual package name in provides. The rest of packages use libsomethingSOVER. Wouldn't it be logical to stick to convention used by the rest of packages? > 2. command `dot` comes from graphviz, but it is missing from B-D. Ack, fixed. > > 3. libodp-generic119 should provide libodp-linux.so.119 instead of >libodp-linux119. And applications that need libodp-linux.so.119 >could declare Depends: libodp-linux.so.119 | libodp-generic119 . > >This is similar to libblas.so.3 | libblas3 setting of the BLAS >implementations. See above. > 4. libodp-generic-dev should Privides: libodp-linux.so . >odp-generic/libodp-linux.so should be registered in the alternatives >system to provide a /usr/lib/DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH/libodp-linux.so . > >The static library /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libodp-linux.a should >be put to the /.../odp-generic directory, and be registered as a slave >of the libodp-linux.so alternative. > >I also noticed that the symlink points to an invalid path. >Please solve this issue by the alternatives system as said above. > >root@bfb95763d3d6 ~/odp-1.19.0.1# ll > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libodp-linux.so >lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 May 23 16:01 > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libodp-linux.so -> libodp-linux.so.119.0.1 > > libblas3 and libopenblas-base and their corresponding -dev packages are > good examples at this point. If you have doubts, you can carefully > examine these packages which may possibly provide help. I have fixed alternatives usage for -dev packages (and removed Conflicts entry in d/contron and README.Debian files). > Please ping me if you have question, or ready for the next round of > review :-) New packages are uploaded to mentors.d.n. Hopefully with this upload I will have just two remaining issues: - manpages - dh_auto_test override. I plan to look onto adding package autotests afterwards. -- With best wishes Dmitry
Bug#896970: marked as done (RFS: odp/1.19.0.1-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2018 10:33:13 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: odp/1.19.0.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #896970, regarding RFS: odp/1.19.0.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 896970: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896970 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist I am looking for a sponsor for my package "odp" * Package name: odp Version : 1.19.0.0-1 Upstream Author : Linaro / ODP community * URL : https://www.opendataplane.org/ * License : [fill in] Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libodp-common-dev - OpenDataPlane library (common development files) libodp-generic-dev - OpenDataPlane reference implementation library (development) libodp-generic119 - OpenDataPlane reference implementation library (runtime) libodphelper-dev - OpenDataPlane helper library (development) libodphelper119 - OpenDataPlane helper library (runtime) odp-doc- OpenDataPlane library (documentation) odp-linux-examples - OpenDataPlane examples To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/odp Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/odp/odp_1.19.0.0-1.dsc More information about odp can be obtained from https://www.opendataplane.org. -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.15.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_GB:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package odp has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
Bug#900407: RFS: odp-dpdk/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Control: block -1 by 896970 Control: block 899383 by -1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "odp-dpdk" * Package name: odp-dpdk Version : 1.19.0.0-1 Upstream Author : Linaro / ODP community * URL : https://www.opendataplane.org/ * License : BSD-3-Clause Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libodp-dpdk-dev - OpenDataPlane DPDK faceplate library (development) libodp-dpdk119 - OpenDataPlane DPDK faceplate library (runtime) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/odp-dpdk Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/odp-dpdk/odp-dpdk_1.19.0.0-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.opendataplane.org. These packages provide hardware-optimized implementation of ODP API (using DPDK as a backend). -- With best wishes Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.16.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_GB:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Re: VCS repositories
Dear Gregor, dear Russ, many thanks for your help, that's even much better than the information I was hoping for :-). Particularly the sources API and dgit are real gems that I would probably not have found myself. Cheers, Chris
