Bug#902641: RFS: streamlink/0.14.0+dfsg-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "streamlink" for a new upstream version 0.14.0. * Package name: streamlink Version : 0.14.0+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Streamlink Team * URL : https://streamlink.github.io/ * License : BSD-2-clause, Apache-2.0, MIT/Expat, SIL-OFL-1.1 Section : python It builds those binary packages: livestreamer - transitional package - streamlink python3-streamlink - Python module for extracting video streams from various websites python3-streamlink-doc - CLI for extracting video streams from various websites (documentation) streamlink - CLI for extracting video streams from various websites to a video player To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/streamlink Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/streamlink/streamlink_0.14.0+dfsg-1.dsc More information about streamlink can be obtained from https://streamlink.github.io/ Changes since the last upload: streamlink (0.14.0+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low * tests: fix shellcheck warnings * docs: move fonts-font-awesome and lib-modernizr to recommends * docs: revert to fonts-font-awesome v4 * Check modernizr symlink in check_docs and refactor it * New upstream version 0.14.0+dfsg * Remove patches applied upstream: freezegun, missing test files, escape sequences * Update patches -- Alexis Murzeau Fri, 29 Jun 2018 00:16:46 +0200 Note: currently, the command4 autopkgtest test will fail on unstable until fonts-font-awesome is reverted to v4 (merge requests to do this are pending). This is because fonts-font-awesome v5 has breaking changes including a fonts rework. See also: #899124. Regards, -- Alexis Murzeau PGP: B7E6 0EBB 9293 7B06 BDBC 2787 E7BD 1904 F480 937F signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#901728: marked as done (RFS: pam-u2f/1.0.7-1 [RC] -- universal 2nd factor (U2F) PAM module)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2018 22:20:27 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: pam-u2f/1.0.7-1 [RC] -- universal 2nd factor (U2F) PAM module has caused the Debian Bug report #901728, regarding RFS: pam-u2f/1.0.7-1 [RC] -- universal 2nd factor (U2F) PAM module to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 901728: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=901728 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Control: block 898519 by -1 Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for an upload to my package, “pam-u2f”: * Package name: pam-u2f * Version: 1.0.7-1 * Upstream: Yubico AB * URL: https://developers.yubico.com/pam-u2f/ * License: BSD-2 * Section: main This fixes an upstream RC bug, #898519, which resulted in one user losing sudo access to their system. Please fetch the source from salsa, and build with `git buildpackage`: https://salsa.debian.org/auth-team/pam-u2f I previously requested a sponsored upload from Stefano (in CC) privately, but he seems to not be very available currently. Best, nicoo -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.16.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package pam-u2f version 1.0.7-1 is in unstable now. https://packages.qa.debian.org/pam-u2f--- End Message ---
Bug#902634: RFS: flashplugin-nonfree/1:3.7+nmu1 [NMU] [RC] -- Adobe Flash Player - browser plugin
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Control: block 851066 by -1
Control: block 889804 by -1
Dear mentors,
I'm looking for a sponsor for an NMU of flashplugin-nonfree, which fixes
some old bugs making the downloader unusable since at least January
2017[1]. The maintainer (Bart Martens) has not responded to that bug at
all, nor has anyone replied to the intent to NMU that I posted last week[2].
This upload includes a patch from Gianluigi Tiesi which removes all
references to Bart's people.debian.org page, which has not seen any
updates during his apparent absence. These include tarball checksum and
GPG verification checks via his site that are *removed* since Adobe
doesn't seem to provide them (instead, they rely on HTTPS).
[1]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=851066
[2]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=851066;msg=127
At the same time, I've also included changes to fix some trivial but
non-RC bugs[3][4].
[3]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862144
[4]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885119
The source of the package is available at mentors[5] as well as Salsa[6]
- note that the current package in unstable never defined a Vcs, so I'm
only using the latter so far as tracking for these fixes.
[5]: https://mentors.debian.net/package/flashplugin-nonfree
[6]: https://salsa.debian.org/jlu-guest/flashplugin-nonfree/
A debdiff (as of writing) is attached, which should be equivalent to the
Salsa diff
https://salsa.debian.org/jlu-guest/flashplugin-nonfree/compare/f9cdfd78a...master
The RFS info:
* Package name: flashplugin-nonfree
Version : 1:3.7+nmu1
Upstream Author : Bart Martens
* URL : http://wiki.debian.org/FlashPlayer
* License : GPL-2
Section : web
Full changelog:
flashplugin-nonfree (1:3.7+nmu1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Remove broken references to https://people.debian.org/~bartm/; patch
from
Gianluigi Tiesi (Closes: #851066, #889804, #884262)
- This removes checksum verification of the Flash tarballs and PGP
validation of get-upstream-version.pl, which were previously
provided by
that site.
- It also rewrites the upstream version parsing to fetch from Adobe
directly.
- Remaining changes to this patch: don't use --no-check-certificate
with wget
* Add Recommends: libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37-gtk2. (Closes: #862144)
* Remove remaining calls to gpg and the dependency on gnupg.
(Closes: #885119)
-- James Lu Fri, 22 Jun 2018 16:27:56 -0700
Best,
James
diff -Nru flashplugin-nonfree-3.7/debian/changelog
flashplugin-nonfree-3.7+nmu1/debian/changelog
--- flashplugin-nonfree-3.7/debian/changelog2016-08-03 22:49:06.0
-0700
+++ flashplugin-nonfree-3.7+nmu1/debian/changelog 2018-06-22
16:27:56.0 -0700
@@ -1,3 +1,21 @@
+flashplugin-nonfree (1:3.7+nmu1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Remove broken references to https://people.debian.org/~bartm/; patch from
+Gianluigi Tiesi (Closes: #851066, #889804, #884262)
+- This removes checksum verification of the Flash tarballs and PGP
+ validation of get-upstream-version.pl, which were previously provided by
+ that site.
+- It also rewrites the upstream version parsing to fetch from Adobe
+ directly.
+- Remaining changes to this patch: don't use --no-check-certificate
+ with wget
+ * Add Recommends: libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37-gtk2. (Closes: #862144)
+ * Remove remaining calls to gpg and the dependency on gnupg.
+(Closes: #885119)
+
+ -- James Lu Fri, 22 Jun 2018 16:27:56 -0700
+
flashplugin-nonfree (1:3.7) unstable; urgency=medium
* update-flashplugin-nonfree: Delete old cached get-upstream-version.pl.
diff -Nru flashplugin-nonfree-3.7/debian/control
flashplugin-nonfree-3.7+nmu1/debian/control
--- flashplugin-nonfree-3.7/debian/control 2016-08-03 22:49:06.0
-0700
+++ flashplugin-nonfree-3.7+nmu1/debian/control 2018-06-22 15:45:59.0
-0700
@@ -8,7 +8,8 @@
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Architecture: i386 amd64
-Depends: debconf | debconf-2.0, wget, gnupg | gnupg2, libatk1.0-0, libcairo2,
libfontconfig1, libfreetype6, libgcc1, libglib2.0-0, libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.14),
libnspr4, libnss3, libpango1.0-0, libstdc++6, libx11-6, libxext6, libxt6,
libcurl3-gnutls, binutils, ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}
+Depends: debconf | debconf-2.0, wget, libatk1.0-0, libcairo2, libfontconfig1,
libfreetype6, libgcc1, libglib2.0-0, libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.14), libnspr4, libnss3,
libpango1.0-0, libstdc++6, libx11-6, libxext6, libxt6, libcurl3-gnutls,
binutils, ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}
+Recommends: libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37-gtk2
Pre-Depends: ca-certificates
Suggests: iceweasel, firefox-esr, konqueror-nsplugins,
ttf-mscorefonts-installer, fonts-dejavu, ttf-xfree86-nonfree,
flashplugin-nonfree-extrasound [i386], hal-flash
Conflicts: flashplugin (<< 6),
Bug#889854: RFS: lxml/4.2.1-1~bpo9+1 [intent to maintain bpo]
Hi Chris,
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 07:47:19PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Nicholas,
>
> > It seems like ${python:Depends} is taking care of pulling in
> > bin:python-lxml_4.2.1-1~bpo9+1 for
> > bin:python-html5-parser_0.4.4-1~bpo9+1, so there's no rush to upload
> > an html5-parser_0.4.4-2, no?
>
> It FTBFS if you don't have 3.8.0 installed as the testsuite fails so
> won't it fail on the builds?
P.S. feel free to block this RFS bug by #902629 if appropriate
Regards,
Nicholas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Bug#889854: RFS: lxml/4.2.1-1~bpo9+1 [intent to maintain bpo]
Nicholas,
> It seems like ${python:Depends} is taking care of pulling in
> bin:python-lxml_4.2.1-1~bpo9+1 for
> bin:python-html5-parser_0.4.4-1~bpo9+1, so there's no rush to upload
> an html5-parser_0.4.4-2, no?
It FTBFS if you don't have 3.8.0 installed as the testsuite fails so
won't it fail on the builds?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Bug#889854: RFS: lxml/4.2.1-1~bpo9+1 [intent to maintain bpo]
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 06:18:35PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Nicholas,
>
> > > Okay, I've re-uploaded lxml_4.2.1-1~bpo9+1_amd64.changes. Did
> > > html5-parser make it though yesterday? Let me know if not.
> >
> > If https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html is up-to-date,
> > then no, it didn't.
>
> Rebuilt and uploaded html5-parser_0.4.4-1~bpo9+1_amd64.changes.
Thank you :-)
> You might want to make the following change to the Builds-Depends:
>
> - python3-lxml
> + python3-lxml (>= 3.8.0),
I agree. Fixed in unreleased 0.4.4-2 at
g...@salsa.debian.org:debian/html5-parser.git
It seems like ${python:Depends} is taking care of pulling in
bin:python-lxml_4.2.1-1~bpo9+1 for
bin:python-html5-parser_0.4.4-1~bpo9+1, so there's no rush to upload
an html5-parser_0.4.4-2, no?
Regards,
Nicholas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Bug#889854: RFS: lxml/4.2.1-1~bpo9+1 [intent to maintain bpo]
Nicholas, > > Okay, I've re-uploaded lxml_4.2.1-1~bpo9+1_amd64.changes. Did > > html5-parser make it though yesterday? Let me know if not. > > If https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html is up-to-date, > then no, it didn't. Rebuilt and uploaded html5-parser_0.4.4-1~bpo9+1_amd64.changes. You might want to make the following change to the Builds-Depends: - python3-lxml + python3-lxml (>= 3.8.0), > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lxml/lxml_4.2.1-1~bpo9+1.dsc This did make it according to backports-new.html. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-
Bug#889854: RFS: lxml/4.2.1-1~bpo9+1 [intent to maintain bpo]
Hi Chris, On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 09:22:17AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > Nicholas, > > Okay, I've re-uploaded lxml_4.2.1-1~bpo9+1_amd64.changes. Did > html5-parser make it though yesterday? Let me know if not. If https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html is up-to-date, then no, it didn't. Let's say that was my fault, because I didn't notice the orig tarballs didn't match what was already in the archive. Here are the updated dscs I uploaded yesterday. By the way, calibre uses pristine-tar so its bpo didn't have this issue. https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/html5-parser/html5-parser_0.4.4-1~bpo9+1.dsc https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lxml/lxml_4.2.1-1~bpo9+1.dsc > > > The following packages will be REMOVED: > > > calibre-build-deps > […] > > This issue sounds like "Using backported debhelper considered tricky" > > ( https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports/2018/06/msg00037.html ). > > Ew. Okay, "fixed" and uploaded calibre_3.26.0+dfsg-1~bpo9+1_amd64.changes. Thanks! Sébastien Villemot also just took care of this issue in the debhelper bpo: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/debhelper/commit/1bc4ca340f8f3e2d5b188e5bb811be02360132e5 Kind regards, Nicholas signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#902613: RFS: i2pd/2.19.0-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "i2pd" * Package name: i2pd Version : 2.19.0-1 Upstream Author : R4SAS * URL : https://github.com/PurpleI2P/i2pd * License : BSD Section : net It builds those binary packages: i2pd - Full-featured C++ implementation of I2P client To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/i2pd Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/i2pd/i2pd_2.19.0-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release Regards, Yangfl
Bug#889854: RFS: lxml/4.2.1-1~bpo9+1 [intent to maintain bpo]
Nicholas, Okay, I've re-uploaded lxml_4.2.1-1~bpo9+1_amd64.changes. Did html5-parser make it though yesterday? Let me know if not. > > The following packages will be REMOVED: > > calibre-build-deps […] > This issue sounds like "Using backported debhelper considered tricky" > ( https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports/2018/06/msg00037.html ). Ew. Okay, "fixed" and uploaded calibre_3.26.0+dfsg-1~bpo9+1_amd64.changes. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-
