Bug#895729: RFS: mkl-dnn/0.15+git20180803.3f58c1 [ITP] -- tensorflow dependency (amd64 specific)
control: tag -1 +moreinfo On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 08:01:10PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 10:16:17AM +, Lumin wrote: > > * Package name: mkl-dnn > >Version : 0.15+git20180803.3f58c16-1 > >Upstream Author : intel > > Alas, the build flags use -march=native -mtune=native which is a big no-no. > The first makes the package crash on any processor lacking an extension that > was present on the build machine and was used by the compiler; unless some > kind of runtime detection is used, packages are allowed only the baseline > ISA for the architecture. As for -mtune=native, it makes the package build > unreproducibly, differing based on where it was compiled. My bad, I overlooked the two flags. The cmake files have been patched in master branch of packaging repo. https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/mkl-dnn/commit/6e0a9bea677d398ee23ac9c2f84c3551d100a6d4 http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/mkl-dnn/0.15+git20180803.3f58c16-1/buildlog > The second problem is that in the testsuite, test_convolution_format_any > fails (0/5 sub-tests). This might be related to my machine being: > vendor_id : AuthenticAMD > model name: AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1055T Processor Well, I have been waiting for intel to fix test failures for a long time. Finally the snapshot 0.15+git20180803.3f58c16 doesn't fail any test on dom-amd64 (E5 2699v?) and my I5-7440HQ, but now it failed on AMD cpu ... > Log of the FTBFS attached. Thanks for the log, I've forwarded it to upstream. https://github.com/intel/mkl-dnn/issues/291 I shouldn't let any test failure from mkl-dnn pass, so we have to wait for upstream to fix the problem. Fortunately, TensorFlow can be compiled with or without mkl-dnn. It doesn't matter if the initial upload of TensorFlow is not linked against mkl-dnn. The difference that mkl-dnn would bring to TensorFlow is computation speed-up.
Bug#905791: marked as done (RFS: swapspace/1.14-1 [ITA])
Your message dated Fri, 10 Aug 2018 01:13:38 +0200 with message-id <20180809231337.oivonsdgm6ias...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#905791: RFS: swapspace/1.14-1 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #905791, regarding RFS: swapspace/1.14-1 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 905791: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=905791 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "swapspace" * Package name: swapspace Version : 1.14-1 Upstream Maintainer : Jacob Adams * URL : https://github.com/Tookmund/Swapspace * License : GPL-2+ Section : admin It builds those binary packages: swapspace - dynamic swap space manager To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/swapspace Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/swapspace/swapspace_1.14-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: swapspace (1.14-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New maintainer. (Closes: #725821) * Redo packaging with debhelper 11 (Closes: #866272) * Account for memory allocated to /dev/shm (Closes: #691128) * Removed swapd conflict as swapd was removed from Debian in 2010 * Fix minor manual page typo -- Jacob Adams Wed, 04 Jul 2018 12:53:34 -0400 Regards, Jacob Adams signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 12:43:22PM -0400, Jacob Adams wrote: > * Package name: swapspace >Version : 1.14-1 > swapspace (1.14-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > * New maintainer. (Closes: #725821) > * Redo packaging with debhelper 11 (Closes: #866272) > * Account for memory allocated to /dev/shm (Closes: #691128) > * Removed swapd conflict as swapd was removed from Debian in 2010 > * Fix minor manual page typo Uploaded. The removal of dpkg-statoverride is scary (the directory is now world-readable), but I have checked that the actual files inside have secure perms, thus it's ok. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ So a Hungarian gypsy mountainman, lumberjack by day job, ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ brigand by, uhm, hobby, invented a dish: goulash on potato ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ pancakes. Then the Polish couldn't decide which of his ⠈⠳⣄ adjectives to use for the dish's name.--- End Message ---
Bug#902476: marked as done (RFS: libzc/0.4.1-1)
Your message dated Thu, 09 Aug 2018 22:31:00 + with message-id <035aeb31-c591-b815-afd0-cf4747965...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: RFS: libzc/0.4.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #902476, regarding RFS: libzc/0.4.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 902476: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=902476 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libzc" * Package name: libzc Version : 0.4.1-1 Upstream Author : Marc Ferland * URL : https://github.com/mferland/libzc * License : GPL-3+ Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libzc-dev - fast password cracking library for zip archives (dev) libzc4 - fast password cracking library for zip archives yazc - Command line tool for the libzc library To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/libzc Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libz/libzc/libzc_0.4.1-1.dsc More information about libzc can be obtained from https://github.com/mferland/libzc. Changes since the last upload: libzc (0.4.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. * Stop checking for host os (Closes: #884792). * Fix tests failures on big-endian machines (Closes: #884385) -- Marc Ferland Sat, 23 Jun 2018 21:49:20 -0500 Regards, Marc Ferland --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 21:48:55 -0400 Marc Ferland wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > [...] > > Changes since the last upload: > > libzc (0.4.1-1) unstable; urgency=low > > * New upstream release. > * Stop checking for host os (Closes: #884792). > * Fix tests failures on big-endian machines (Closes: #884385) > >-- Marc Ferland Sat, 23 Jun 2018 21:49:20 -0500 > > Regards, >Marc Ferland > > Hi Marc, Thanks for wanting to improve Debian and I am sorry you had to wait so long for a reply. I have reviewed the changes and I got two remarks plus one suggestion. The remarks: 1) the changelog omits notable changes made since the last release to the packaging, such as the debhelper compat bump (which in some cases can cause significant changes) and the fact that the ABI changed (libzc3 -> libzc4). 2) The ABI as changed and there is no a mention of it in the changelog nor this bug. Normally, this requires planning a transition - said planning will be more or less formal depending on the number of reverse dependencies and is something the sponsor has to check for. On the more positive front, since there are no reverse dependencies of libzc, there is not much of a transition to do. That along with A) that the other changes omitted in the changelog are not user visible, B) it appears to be your second upload, I have decided not to block the upload on these remarks. On the suggestion front: libzc does not require (fake)root to produce the deb files. Please consider adding "Rules-Requires-Root: no" to the source paragraph of debian/control to indicate this. I have sponsored your package as it is. Once again, thanks for your contribution to Debian and apologies for the long wait. Feel free to CC me directly on your next RFS on libzc. Thanks, ~Niels signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --- End Message ---
Bug#905791: RFS: swapspace/1.14-1 [ITA]
On 08/09/2018 04:25 PM, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 12:43:22PM -0400, Jacob Adams wrote: >> * Package name: swapspace >>Version : 1.14-1 > >> swapspace (1.14-1) unstable; urgency=medium >> >> * New maintainer. (Closes: #725821) >> * Redo packaging with debhelper 11 (Closes: #866272) >> * Account for memory allocated to /dev/shm (Closes: #691128) >> * Removed swapd conflict as swapd was removed from Debian in 2010 >> * Fix minor manual page typo > > Hi! > This is bad: > Files in second .deb but not in first > - > -rw-r--r-- root/root /lib/systemd/system/swapspace.service > [...] > > Files in first .deb but not in second > - > [...] > -rwxr-xr-x root/root /etc/init.d/swapspace > > > And this is not even an upstream change, but a regression in the packaging: > --- swapspace-1.10/debian/swapspace.init2018-08-09 20:58:32.0 > +0200 > +++ swapspace-1.14/debian/swapspace.init1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 > +0100 > > > While some people may decide to use systemd, your change breaks the package > for everyone else. That shouldn't be done without a very good reason. Apologizes. Accidentally dropped the file when reshuffling everything to debhelper 11. Fixed and reuploaded. Thanks for keeping me accountable. Jacob signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#905791: RFS: swapspace/1.14-1 [ITA]
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 12:43:22PM -0400, Jacob Adams wrote: > * Package name: swapspace >Version : 1.14-1 > swapspace (1.14-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > * New maintainer. (Closes: #725821) > * Redo packaging with debhelper 11 (Closes: #866272) > * Account for memory allocated to /dev/shm (Closes: #691128) > * Removed swapd conflict as swapd was removed from Debian in 2010 > * Fix minor manual page typo Hi! This is bad: Files in second .deb but not in first - -rw-r--r-- root/root /lib/systemd/system/swapspace.service [...] Files in first .deb but not in second - [...] -rwxr-xr-x root/root /etc/init.d/swapspace And this is not even an upstream change, but a regression in the packaging: --- swapspace-1.10/debian/swapspace.init2018-08-09 20:58:32.0 +0200 +++ swapspace-1.14/debian/swapspace.init1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 While some people may decide to use systemd, your change breaks the package for everyone else. That shouldn't be done without a very good reason. Meow. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ So a Hungarian gypsy mountainman, lumberjack by day job, ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ brigand by, uhm, hobby, invented a dish: goulash on potato ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ pancakes. Then the Polish couldn't decide which of his ⠈⠳⣄ adjectives to use for the dish's name.
Avoid building Sphinx documentation on request (was: Bug#905750: RFS: elpy/1.23.0-1)
Chris Lamb writes: > * You should probably avoid building the documentation too if the >nodocs build profile is enabled. For packages from PyPI which have documentation detectable by ‘dh_sphinxdoc’, does this (avoid building the documentation if the “nodocs” build profile is enabled) just work by default? Or do we need some specific change to the Debian package? Is there generic Debian package maintainer advice that can be given – specific things to put in ‘/debian/rules’, etc. – to let “nodocs” work as designed? -- \ “Either he's dead or my watch has stopped.” —Groucho Marx | `\ | _o__) | Ben Finney
Bug#895729: RFS: mkl-dnn/0.15+git20180803.3f58c1 [ITP] -- tensorflow dependency (amd64 specific)
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 10:16:17AM +, Lumin wrote: > * Package name: mkl-dnn >Version : 0.15+git20180803.3f58c16-1 >Upstream Author : intel Alas, the build flags use -march=native -mtune=native which is a big no-no. The first makes the package crash on any processor lacking an extension that was present on the build machine and was used by the compiler; unless some kind of runtime detection is used, packages are allowed only the baseline ISA for the architecture. As for -mtune=native, it makes the package build unreproducibly, differing based on where it was compiled. The second problem is that in the testsuite, test_convolution_format_any fails (0/5 sub-tests). This might be related to my machine being: vendor_id : AuthenticAMD model name : AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1055T Processor Log of the FTBFS attached. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ So a Hungarian gypsy mountainman, lumberjack by day job, ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ brigand by, uhm, hobby, invented a dish: goulash on potato ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ pancakes. Then the Polish couldn't decide which of his ⠈⠳⣄ adjectives to use for the dish's name. mkl-dnn_0.15+git20180803.3f58c16-1_amd64.build.xz Description: application/xz
Bug#905791: RFS: swapspace/1.14-1 [ITA]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "swapspace" * Package name: swapspace Version : 1.14-1 Upstream Maintainer : Jacob Adams * URL : https://github.com/Tookmund/Swapspace * License : GPL-2+ Section : admin It builds those binary packages: swapspace - dynamic swap space manager To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/swapspace Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/swapspace/swapspace_1.14-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: swapspace (1.14-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New maintainer. (Closes: #725821) * Redo packaging with debhelper 11 (Closes: #866272) * Account for memory allocated to /dev/shm (Closes: #691128) * Removed swapd conflict as swapd was removed from Debian in 2010 * Fix minor manual page typo -- Jacob Adams Wed, 04 Jul 2018 12:53:34 -0400 Regards, Jacob Adams signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#902225: marked as done (RFS: ii/1.8-1)
Your message dated Thu, 09 Aug 2018 13:19:00 + with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#902225: RFS: ii/1.8-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #902225, regarding RFS: ii/1.8-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 902225: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=902225 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, @Nico: I added myself to Uploaders. Please shout, if that is not what you meant in #890995 [1]. I am looking for a sponsor for the package "ii" * Package name: ii Version : 1.8-1 Upstream Author : Hiltjo Posthuma, Anselm R. Garbe, Nico Golde * URL : https://tools.suckless.org/ii/ * License : MIT/X-Consortium-License Section : net It builds those binary packages: ii- minimalist FIFO and filesystem-based IRC client To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/ii Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/ii/ii_1.8-1.dsc More information about ii can be obtained from https://tools.suckless.org/ii/. Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release (Closes: #890995). * Fix watchfile (upstream URL changed). * Bump compat level and debhelper dependency to 11. * Bump standards version to 4.1.4. * Update patch respect_dpkg_buildflags.patch. * Enable hardening (requires dpkg-dev >= 1.16.1.1). * Switch to machine-readable copyright file. * Experimental autopkgtest smoke-test. * Switch to HTTPS upstream links. * Add myself to Uploaders. Regards, itd [1]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=890995#10 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- itd: > Hi, > > Niels Thykier: >>> Niels Thykier: * Relicense the patches to the same as upstream (requires approval from the previous maintainer). We already spoke about this on IRC. >> For good measure, please document this in the changelog. > Done. > >> This is caused by how the copyright file is read. > Updated, thanks! :) > >> A good idea for bootstrapping a git repo. :) Given that you are (about >> to be) the official maintainer for ii, please make it public and then >> you can add the Vcs-Git + Vcs-Browser fields in debian/control as well. :) > Done and done. > >> Alternatively, we can add a "debian/ii" repo that you can work in if >> you think that would be better. (But I do not think it is worth >> stalling the upload for that. Uploads are cheap so we can always do >> another one for that) > In the long run, "debian/ii" would be nice. :) > >> On a related note, as Axel mentioned, Nico has retired from Debian. >> Please replace him with yourself in the Maintainers field (and drop the >> Uploaders field). :) > Done (to avoid unnecessary confusion. I'd rather wait doing that). > > > Thanks for the feedback! > > Regards, > itd > Uploaded and accepted into unstable. Thanks for your contribution to Debian. :) ~Niels--- End Message ---
Bug#905750: marked as done (RFS: elpy/1.23.0-1)
Your message dated Thu, 09 Aug 2018 10:27:32 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: elpy/1.23.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #905750, regarding RFS: elpy/1.23.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 905750: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=905750 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "elpy" Hi Chris, I've CCed you because you've sponsored past releases. Package name: elpy Version : 1.23.0-1 Upstream Author : Jorgen Schaefer URL : https://github.com/jorgenschaefer/elpy License : GPL-3+ Section : devel It builds this binary package: elpa-elpy - Emacs Python Development Environment To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/elpy Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/elpy/elpy_1.23.0-1.dsc Alternatively, clone its repository using this command: git clone https://salsa.debian.org/emacsen-team/elpy.git Changes since the last upload: elpy (1.23.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream version. * Build and install info page. * Declare Standards-Version: 4.2.0 - §12.7, Install NEWS.rst as NEWS. * Add "Local Variables" footer to NEWS so that it opens in ReST mode. * Compress README.rst with gzip before installing. -- Nicholas D Steeves Wed, 08 Aug 2018 16:04:52 -0400 elpy (1.22.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium Regards, Nicholas D Steeves --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package elpy version 1.23.0-1 is in unstable now. https://packages.qa.debian.org/elpy--- End Message ---
Bug#895729: RFS: mkl-dnn/0.15+git20180803.3f58c1 [ITP] -- tensorflow dependency (amd64 specific)
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Disclaimer: Intel made some confusing naming. I should point out that mkl-dnn is a free software, which can be independently compiled and used without any component from intel-mkl . Without linking against intel-mkl, we would get a suboptimal performance, but intel claimed that they are trying to reduce the performance gap. 1. [Apache-2.0] mkl-dnn: Intel Math Kernel Library - Deep Neural Network 2. [non-free] intel-mkl: Intel Math Kernel Library intel-mkl contains another set of dnn api (mkl_dnn.h) but let's ignore it. Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mkl-dnn" * Package name: mkl-dnn Version : 0.15+git20180803.3f58c16-1 Upstream Author : intel * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] * License : [fill in] Section : science It builds those binary packages: libmkldnn-dev - Math Kernel Library for Deep Neural Networks (dev) libmkldnn-doc - Math Kernel Library for Deep Neural Networks (doc) libmkldnn0 - Math Kernel Library for Deep Neural Networks (lib) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/mkl-dnn Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mkl-dnn/mkl-dnn_0.15+git20180803.3f58c16-1.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/mkl-dnn/0.15+git20180803.3f58c16-1/buildlog Changes since the last upload: mkl-dnn (0.15+git20180803.3f58c16-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release. (Closes: #894411)
Bug#905750: RFS: elpy/1.23.0-1
tags 905750 + pending thanks Nicholas, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "elpy" Uploaded elpy_1.23.0-1_amd64.changes. For your wishlist/TODO: * Please fix "wrong-section-according-to-package-name" on your next upload (or otherwise fix Lintian). * You should probably avoid building the documentation too if the nodocs build profile is enabled. * gzip -9 might need to be gzip -9n for a reproducible build (unchecked) but I'm surprised it's not compressed by another tool too (unchecked). Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-
