Bug#935774: RFS: games/dMagnetic [ITP]- A Magnetic Scrolls Interpreter

2019-08-25 Thread dettus 

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dmagnetic":

* Package name : dMagnetic
Version : 0.17-1
Upstream Author : Thomas Dettbarn 
* URL : http://www.dettus.net/dMagnetic
* License : BSD
* Vcs : https://github.com/dettus/ports_and_packages/tree/master/Debian

Section : games



It builds those binary packages:

  dMagnetic - A Magnetic Scrolls Interpreter

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:



  https://mentors.debian.net/package/dmagnetic

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dmagnetic/dmagnetic_0.17-1.dsc


Changes since the last upload:

I updated from version 0.16 to 0.17.

Regards,

Thomas Dettbarn 


So, dMagnetic is a Magnetic scrolls interpreter. It allows the owner of 
classic text
adventures such as "The Pawn", "The Guild of Thieves", "Fish!", 
"Jinxter", "Myth",
"Corruption" and "Wonderland" to play them, once more, but on modern 
hardware and
within a terminal window. The beautiful graphics are being rendered in 
glorious ANSI

Art, or even ASCII Art, ifpreferred.

The package itself is almost finished, it needs a little bit of advise 
from somebody

a little more experienced in creating packages.

Thus, if you are a SPONSOR, please please have a look at the project's 
website, which
can be found at http://www.dettus.net/dMagnetic. It would be a 
TREMENDOUS honor for
me to see my project in your repository. It would be a very good fit for 
Debian.



Thank you!!

Bug#934224: marked as done (RFS: subnetcalc/2.4.14-1 -- IPv4/IPv6 Subnet Calculator)

2019-08-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 26 Aug 2019 02:58:31 +0200
with message-id <20190826005831.gc17...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#934224: RFS: subnetcalc/2.4.13-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #934224,
regarding RFS: subnetcalc/2.4.14-1 -- IPv4/IPv6 Subnet Calculator
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
934224: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934224
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "subnetcalc
":

  * Package name: subnetcalc
Version: 2.4.13-1
Upstream Author: Thomas Dreibholz mailto:dre...@iem.uni-due.de>>
  * URL: https://www.uni-due.de/~be0001/subnetcalc/
  * License: GPL-3+
  * Section: net

SubNetCalc is an IPv4/IPv6 subnet address calculator. For given IPv4 or
IPv6 address and netmask or prefix length, it calculates network
address, broadcast address, maximum number of hosts and host address
range. The output is colourized for better readability (e.g. network
part, host part). Also, it prints the addresses in binary format for
better understandability. Furthermore, it can identify the address type
(e.g. multicast, unique local, site local, etc.) and extract additional
information from the address (e.g. type, scope, interface ID, etc.).
Finally, it can generate IPv6 unique local prefixes.

"subnetcalc " builds these
binary packages:

  * subnetcalc - IPv4/IPv6 Subnet Calculator

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/subnetcalc.

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/subnetcalc/subnetcalc_2.4.13-1.dsc

More information about "subnetcalc
" can be obtained from
https://www.uni-due.de/~be0001/subnetcalc/.

Most recent changelog entry:

subnetcalc (2.4.13-1ubuntu1) eoan; urgency=medium

  * New upstream release.

-- Thomas Dreibholz > Wed, 07 Aug 2019
17:40:55 +0200

-- 
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Med vennlig hilsen

===
 Thomas Dreibholz

 Simula Research Laboratory A/S
 SimulaMet — Simula Metropolitan Centre for Digital Engineering
 Centre for Resilient Networks and Applications
 Pilestredet 52
 0167 Oslo, Norway
---
 E-Mail: dre...@simula.no
 Homepage:   http://simula.no/people/dreibh
===



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 01:13:47PM +0200, Thomas Dreibholz wrote:
>   * Package name: subnetcalc
> Version: 2.4.13-1

> Most recent changelog entry:
> 
> subnetcalc (2.4.13-1ubuntu1) eoan; urgency=medium
> 
>   * New upstream release.
> 
> -- Thomas Dreibholz > Wed, 07 Aug 2019
> 17:40:55 +0200

2.4.13-1, actually.

Then there's a boatload of changes done in Ubuntu when the package was
completely neglected in Debian.  The diff that was relevant goes all the way
to that ancient version.  But all of that looks ok.

Uploaded, thanks for taking care of the package!


Meow.
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋  The root of a real enemy is an imaginary friend.
⠈⠳⣄--- End Message ---

Bug#935763: marked as done (RFS: doclifter/2.19-1 [QA upload])

2019-08-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 26 Aug 2019 01:39:51 +0200
with message-id <20190825233951.gb17...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#935763: RFS: doclifter/2.19-1 [QA upload]
has caused the Debian Bug report #935763,
regarding RFS: doclifter/2.19-1 [QA upload]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
935763: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=935763
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for a QA upload of the doclifter package.

My changes include mostly just standard maintenance work and a new upstream 
release:

  doclifter (2.19-1) unstable; urgency=medium

* QA upload.
* New upstream release.
* Upgrade to Standards-Version 4.4.0 (no changes).
* Upgrade to debhelper compat level 12.

   -- Fabian Wolff   Sun, 25 Aug 2019 23:56:47 +0200


These changes can be found on Salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/doclifter

And I've also uploaded the package to Mentors: 
https://mentors.debian.net/package/doclifter


Thanks for your help!

Best regards,
Fabian
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 12:50:06AM +0200, Fabian Wolff wrote:
>   doclifter (2.19-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> 
> * QA upload.
> * New upstream release.
> * Upgrade to Standards-Version 4.4.0 (no changes).
> * Upgrade to debhelper compat level 12.
> 
>-- Fabian Wolff   Sun, 25 Aug 2019 23:56:47 +0200

✓

-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋  The root of a real enemy is an imaginary friend.
⠈⠳⣄--- End Message ---

Bug#935765: marked as done (RFS: eqonomize 1.4.1-1 [QA upload])

2019-08-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 26 Aug 2019 01:39:30 +0200
with message-id <20190825233930.ga17...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#935765: RFS: eqonomize 1.4.1-1 [QA upload]
has caused the Debian Bug report #935765,
regarding RFS: eqonomize 1.4.1-1 [QA upload]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
935765: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=935765
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for a QA upload of the eqonomize package.


My changes can be found on Salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/eqonomize

I have mainly imported a new upstream version and performed some standard 
package maintenance tasks (Ondřej Nový pushed one commit to the Salsa 
repository a while ago, so I've kept him in the changelog):

  eqonomize (1.4.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium

* QA upload.

[ Ondřej Nový ]
* d/control: Fix wrong Vcs-*

[ Fabian Wolff ]
* New upstream release.
* Upgrade to Standards-Version 4.4.0 (no changes).
* Upgrade to debhelper compat level 12.
* Update debian/copyright.

   -- Fabian Wolff   Mon, 26 Aug 2019 00:37:56 +0200


Lintian reports one warning regarding an icon having the wrong size, which I 
have forwarded to upstream: https://github.com/Eqonomize/Eqonomize/issues/88

Other than that, the package should be in good shape; here is the Mentors 
report: https://mentors.debian.net/package/eqonomize


Thanks for your help!

Best regards,
Fabian
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 01:10:10AM +0200, Fabian Wolff wrote:
>   eqonomize (1.4.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> 
> * QA upload.
> 
> [ Ondřej Nový ]
> * d/control: Fix wrong Vcs-*
> 
> [ Fabian Wolff ]
> * New upstream release.
> * Upgrade to Standards-Version 4.4.0 (no changes).
> * Upgrade to debhelper compat level 12.
> * Update debian/copyright.
> 
>-- Fabian Wolff   Mon, 26 Aug 2019 00:37:56 +0200

✓

-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋  The root of a real enemy is an imaginary friend.
⠈⠳⣄--- End Message ---

Re: Salsa repository request (aj-snapshot, dbacl, ffe)

2019-08-25 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior 
On Sunday, August 25 2019, Fabian Wolff wrote:

> Hi,

Hi Fabian,

> I am currently preparing QA uploads for the 'aj-snapshot', 'dbacl', and 'ffe' 
> packages [0, 1, 2].

Thanks for doing this.

> I would like to create packaging repositories for these projects in
> the Debian group on Salsa [3], but since I am not a Debian Developer,
> I don't have the necessary permissions on Salsa to create them myself.
>
>
> So, could somebody please create these three repositories for me and give me, 
> wolff-guest, write access to them?

Done for all three.

Thanks,

-- 
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF  31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#935765: RFS: eqonomize 1.4.1-1 [QA upload]

2019-08-25 Thread Fabian Wolff 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for a QA upload of the eqonomize package.


My changes can be found on Salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/eqonomize

I have mainly imported a new upstream version and performed some standard 
package maintenance tasks (Ondřej Nový pushed one commit to the Salsa 
repository a while ago, so I've kept him in the changelog):

  eqonomize (1.4.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium

* QA upload.

[ Ondřej Nový ]
* d/control: Fix wrong Vcs-*

[ Fabian Wolff ]
* New upstream release.
* Upgrade to Standards-Version 4.4.0 (no changes).
* Upgrade to debhelper compat level 12.
* Update debian/copyright.

   -- Fabian Wolff   Mon, 26 Aug 2019 00:37:56 +0200


Lintian reports one warning regarding an icon having the wrong size, which I 
have forwarded to upstream: https://github.com/Eqonomize/Eqonomize/issues/88

Other than that, the package should be in good shape; here is the Mentors 
report: https://mentors.debian.net/package/eqonomize


Thanks for your help!

Best regards,
Fabian

Bug#935763: RFS: doclifter/2.19-1 [QA upload]

2019-08-25 Thread Fabian Wolff 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for a QA upload of the doclifter package.

My changes include mostly just standard maintenance work and a new upstream 
release:

  doclifter (2.19-1) unstable; urgency=medium

* QA upload.
* New upstream release.
* Upgrade to Standards-Version 4.4.0 (no changes).
* Upgrade to debhelper compat level 12.

   -- Fabian Wolff   Sun, 25 Aug 2019 23:56:47 +0200


These changes can be found on Salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/doclifter

And I've also uploaded the package to Mentors: 
https://mentors.debian.net/package/doclifter


Thanks for your help!

Best regards,
Fabian

Salsa repository request (aj-snapshot, dbacl, ffe)

2019-08-25 Thread Fabian Wolff 
Hi,

I am currently preparing QA uploads for the 'aj-snapshot', 'dbacl', and 'ffe' 
packages [0, 1, 2].

I would like to create packaging repositories for these projects in the Debian 
group on Salsa [3], but since I am not a Debian Developer, I don't have the 
necessary permissions on Salsa to create them myself.


So, could somebody please create these three repositories for me and give me, 
wolff-guest, write access to them?

Thank you!

Best regards,
Fabian

[0] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/aj-snapshot
[1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dbacl
[2] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ffe
[3] https://salsa.debian.org/debian

RE:uscan of the tango package, mk-origtargz

2019-08-25 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel 
> Can you reproduce the problem with:
> $ cat tango-9.3.3-rc2.tar | tar --delete  > \
>  tango-9.3.3-rc2-excluded.tar
> ?

here

:~/Debian/tango$ cat tango-9.3.3-rc2.tar | tar --delete 
tango-9.3.3/lib/java/RestServer-1.14.jar > tango-9.3.3-rc2-excluded.tar
tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/RestServer-1.14.jar : non trouvé dans l'archive
tar: Arrêt avec code d'échec à cause des erreurs précédentes

So it does not work this way

Re: uscan of the tango package, mk-origtargz

2019-08-25 Thread Felix Natter 
Felix Natter  writes:

> hi PICCA,
>
> PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel 
> writes:
>>> Please confirm that
>>> > LANG=C tar --delete $(tar tf tango-9.3.3-rc2.tar | grep
>>> "lib/java/R.*jar") < tango-9.3.3-rc2.tar > tango.tar
>>> is inspired by `mk-origtargz`.
>>
>> not at all, I found this in #869087, which is a tar bug with --delete.
>>
>> It is not clear to me what is the cmd executed by mk-origtargz.
>> It would be nice to have a debug mode for this.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Fred
>>
>>> Karma bonus points for providing context.
>>
>> I just try to make gbp import-orig --uscan works with my package.
>
> Although out-of-place tar deletion undoubtedly is more robust than
> in-place deletion, I wouldn't be surprised if there is a bug, too.
> (which is really bad for Debian infrastructure, so we should
> identify/fix this).
>
> Can you reproduce the problem with:
> $ cat tango-9.3.3-rc2.tar | tar --delete  > \
>   tango-9.3.3-rc2-excluded.tar
> ?

Ok, I see this is already confirmed for another package in #869087.

The question is: what to do, since the other tar option now seems broken
as well (and upstream did not want to fix in-place deletion bugs, so
they probably don't want to fix out-of-place bugs either). Maybe use
perl's Archive::Tar?

Cheers and Best Regards,
--
Felix Natter
debian/rules!

Re: uscan of the tango package, mk-origtargz

2019-08-25 Thread Felix Natter 
hi PICCA,

PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel 
writes:
>> Please confirm that
>> > LANG=C tar --delete $(tar tf tango-9.3.3-rc2.tar | grep "lib/java/R.*jar") 
>> > < tango-9.3.3-rc2.tar > tango.tar
>> is inspired by `mk-origtargz`.
>
> not at all, I found this in #869087, which is a tar bug with --delete.
>
> It is not clear to me what is the cmd executed by mk-origtargz.
> It would be nice to have a debug mode for this.
>
> Cheers
>
> Fred
>
>> Karma bonus points for providing context.
>
> I just try to make  gbp import-orig --uscan works with my package.

Although out-of-place tar deletion undoubtedly is more robust than
in-place deletion, I wouldn't be surprised if there is a bug, too.
(which is really bad for Debian infrastructure, so we should
identify/fix this).

Can you reproduce the problem with:
$ cat tango-9.3.3-rc2.tar | tar --delete  > \
  tango-9.3.3-rc2-excluded.tar
?

Cheers and Best Regards,
--
Felix Natter
debian/rules!

Re: uscan of the tango package, mk-origtargz

2019-08-25 Thread Felix Natter 
hello Geert,

Geert Stappers  writes:
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 01:25:22PM +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
>> I tryed to reproduce the issue like this
>>
>> LANG=C tar --delete $(tar tf tango-9.3.3-rc2.tar | grep "lib/java/R.*jar") < 
>> tango-9.3.3-rc2.tar > tango.tar
>> tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/RestServer-1.14.jar: Not found in archive
>> tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors
>>
>> Is it the right way to use --delete ?
>
>
> Added "mk-origtargz" to the Subject
>
> Please confirm that
>> LANG=C tar --delete $(tar tf tango-9.3.3-rc2.tar | grep "lib/java/R.*jar") < 
>> tango-9.3.3-rc2.tar > tango.tar
> is inspired by `mk-origtargz`.
>
> Karma bonus points for providing context.

https://salsa.debian.org/debian/devscripts/blob/master/lib/Devscripts/MkOrigtargz.pm#L262

The history is that in 2015, we discovered that when mk-origtargz runs
tar's in-place deletion, it also deletes other files (random misbehavior
which upstream does not intend to fix). So we replaced it with piping
through tar --delete to an anonymous file (out-of-place, see source
above):

devscripts (2.15.9) unstable; urgency=medium

  [ Joachim Breitner ]
  * mk-origtargz:
+ Work around tar --delete not working unless piping. This should
  make the support for Excluded-Files more reliable.
  Thanks to Felix Natter for identifying the problem and solution.
[...]

Cheers and Best Regards,
--
Felix Natter
debian/rules!

RE:uscan of the tango package, mk-origtargz

2019-08-25 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel 
> Please confirm that
> > LANG=C tar --delete $(tar tf tango-9.3.3-rc2.tar | grep "lib/java/R.*jar") 
> > < tango-9.3.3-rc2.tar > tango.tar
> is inspired by `mk-origtargz`.

not at all, I found this in #869087, which is a tar bug with --delete.

It is not clear to me what is the cmd executed by mk-origtargz.
It would be nice to have a debug mode for this.

Cheers

Fred

> Karma bonus points for providing context.

I just try to make  gbp import-orig --uscan works with my package.

cheers

Re: uscan of the tango package, mk-origtargz

2019-08-25 Thread Geert Stappers 
On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 01:25:22PM +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> I tryed to reproduce the issue like this
> 
> LANG=C tar --delete $(tar tf tango-9.3.3-rc2.tar | grep "lib/java/R.*jar") < 
> tango-9.3.3-rc2.tar > tango.tar
> tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/RestServer-1.14.jar: Not found in archive
> tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors
> 
> Is it the right way to use --delete ?


Added "mk-origtargz" to the Subject

Please confirm that 
> LANG=C tar --delete $(tar tf tango-9.3.3-rc2.tar | grep "lib/java/R.*jar") < 
> tango-9.3.3-rc2.tar > tango.tar
is inspired by `mk-origtargz`.

Karma bonus points for providing context.



Regards
Geert Stappers
-- 
Yes, there is fragile balance between
deleting too much and deleting too less
of the previous message

RE:uscan of the tango package

2019-08-25 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel 
I tryed to reproduce the issue like this

LANG=C tar --delete $(tar tf tango-9.3.3-rc2.tar | grep "lib/java/R.*jar") < 
tango-9.3.3-rc2.tar > tango.tar
tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/RestServer-1.14.jar: Not found in archive
tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors

Is it the right way to use --delete ?

RE:uscan of the tango package

2019-08-25 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel 
> mk-origtargz just calls tar --delete < file > newfile and as you can
> easily check this indeed gives the same error message.

the listed files are the right files as extracted by tar from the upstream 
tar.gz, so 
this is an issue with tar ?

Is it possible to display the exact tar command line generated by mk-origtargz ?

Re: uscan of the tango package

2019-08-25 Thread Geert Stappers 
On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 08:24:14AM +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> > >   ... an error like "could not remove *.jar" ...
> > Found jar deletion instruction
> > at 
> > https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/tango/blob/master/debian/copyright#L5
> 
> yes I use
> Files-Excluded: lib/java/*.jar
> 
> from DEP-5 (it was find until now)
> 
> > I assume that upstream has stopped shipping jars in there .tar.gz
> > If so, then it is a good thing.
> 
> not at all, the files are right there and the version number of each jars are 
>  the one of the upstream tar.
> 
> so I do not understand the error.
> 
> 
> did you tryed to do 
> 
>   gbp import-orig --uscan
> 
> and look at the upstream tar.gz ?
 
No, I didn't do that.


Regards
Geert Stappers

Totally convinced that "Reply-To-List" is a good thing.

Re: uscan of the tango package

2019-08-25 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin 
On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 08:01:52AM +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> > It cannot delete them because they are not there.
That was a wild guess. It seems the files are actually present.

> So their is a bug in mk-origtargz ?
> 
> Who is in charge of the deletion ?
mk-origtargz just calls tar --delete < file > newfile and as you can
easily check this indeed gives the same error message.

-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

RE:uscan of the tango package

2019-08-25 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel 
looking at the directroy, I find this
drwxr-xr-x 11 picca picca  4096 août  20 17:23 tango-9.3.3
-rw-r--r--  1 picca picca 282982400 août  25 08:37 
tango_9.3.3~rc2+dfsg1.orig.tar
-rw-r--r--  1 picca picca 232776497 août  25 08:36 tango-9.3.3-rc2.tar.gz

what is strange it that the extracted directory is

tango-9.3.3 and not tango-9.3.3-rc2 like the upstream version.

In fact, I just changed the uscan file in order to get an artefact from github

version=4 opts="dversionmangle=s/\+dfsg\d*$//,\
   repacksuffix=+dfsg1,\
   uversionmangle=s/-(rc|a|b|c)/~$1/" \
   https://github.com/tango-controls/TangoSourceDistribution/releases \
   .*/@PACKAGE@@ANY_VERSION@\.tar\.gz debian uupdate

Is there something wrong here ?

RE:uscan of the tango package

2019-08-25 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel 
Hello

> Found jar deletion instruction
> at https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/tango/blob/master/debian/copyright#L5

yes I use
Files-Excluded: lib/java/*.jar

from DEP-5 (it was find until now)

> I assume that upstream has stopped shipping jars in there .tar.gz
> If so, then it is a good thing.

not at all, the files are right there and the version number of each jars are  
the one of the upstream tar.

so I do not understand the error.


did you tryed to do 

gbp import-orig --uscan

and look at the upstream tar.gz ?

Re: uscan of the tango package

2019-08-25 Thread Geert Stappers 
On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 12:58:58PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 07:31:38AM +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > When I try to import the new tango[1] sources with
> > 
> > gbp import-orig -uscan
> > 
> > I get this error
> > 
> > :~/Debian/tango/tango$ LANG=C gbp import-orig --uscan
> > gbp:info: Launching uscan...
> > tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/RestServer-1.14.jar: Not found in archive
> > tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/Pogo-9.6.23.jar: Not found in archive
> > tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/LogViewer-2.0.5.jar: Not found in archive
> > tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/Jive-7.22.jar: Not found in archive
> > tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/JTango-9.5.15.jar: Not found in archive
> > tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/JSSHTerminal-1.16.jar: Not found in archive
> > tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/DBBench-1.3.jar: Not found in archive
> > tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/Astor-7.2.7.jar: Not found in archive
> > tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/ATKWidget-9.3.6.jar: Not found in archive
> > tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/ATKTuning-4.7.jar: Not found in archive
> > tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/ATKPanel-5.8.jar: Not found in archive
> > tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/ATKCore-9.3.6.jar: Not found in archive
> > tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors
> > uscan: error: tar --delete tango-9.3.3/lib/java/RestServer-1.14.jar 
> > tango-9.3.3/lib/java/Pogo-9.6.23.jar 
> > tango-9.3.3/lib/java/LogViewer-2.0.5.jar tango-9.3.3/lib/java/Jive-7.22.jar 
> > tango-9.3.3/lib/java/JTango-9.5.15.jar 
> > tango-9.3.3/lib/java/JSSHTerminal-1.16.jar 
> > tango-9.3.3/lib/java/DBBench-1.3.jar tango-9.3.3/lib/java/Astor-7.2.7.jar 
> > tango-9.3.3/lib/java/ATKWidget-9.3.6.jar 
> > tango-9.3.3/lib/java/ATKTuning-4.7.jar 
> > tango-9.3.3/lib/java/ATKPanel-5.8.jar 
> > tango-9.3.3/lib/java/ATKCore-9.3.6.jar subprocess returned exit status 2
> > gbp:error: Uscan failed - debug by running 'uscan --verbose'
> > 
> > 
> > The copyright file  exclude all the .jar files from the sources. So I do 
> > not undrrstand why tar complain about these missing files.
> It cannot delete them because they are not there.

I started looking for a delete command in the uscan watch file
( https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/tango/blob/master/debian/watch )
but could not find it.

Found jar deletion instruction
at https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/tango/blob/master/debian/copyright#L5


I assume that upstream has stopped shipping jars in there .tar.gz
If so, then it is a good thing.

Nevertheless it means also further update of the debian directory.


Groeten
Geert Stappers
-- 
Leven en laten leven


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: uscan of the tango package

2019-08-25 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin 
On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 07:31:38AM +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> When I try to import the new tango[1] sources with
> 
> gbp import-orig -uscan
> 
> I get this error
> 
> :~/Debian/tango/tango$ LANG=C gbp import-orig --uscan
> gbp:info: Launching uscan...
> tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/RestServer-1.14.jar: Not found in archive
> tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/Pogo-9.6.23.jar: Not found in archive
> tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/LogViewer-2.0.5.jar: Not found in archive
> tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/Jive-7.22.jar: Not found in archive
> tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/JTango-9.5.15.jar: Not found in archive
> tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/JSSHTerminal-1.16.jar: Not found in archive
> tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/DBBench-1.3.jar: Not found in archive
> tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/Astor-7.2.7.jar: Not found in archive
> tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/ATKWidget-9.3.6.jar: Not found in archive
> tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/ATKTuning-4.7.jar: Not found in archive
> tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/ATKPanel-5.8.jar: Not found in archive
> tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/ATKCore-9.3.6.jar: Not found in archive
> tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors
> uscan: error: tar --delete tango-9.3.3/lib/java/RestServer-1.14.jar 
> tango-9.3.3/lib/java/Pogo-9.6.23.jar tango-9.3.3/lib/java/LogViewer-2.0.5.jar 
> tango-9.3.3/lib/java/Jive-7.22.jar tango-9.3.3/lib/java/JTango-9.5.15.jar 
> tango-9.3.3/lib/java/JSSHTerminal-1.16.jar 
> tango-9.3.3/lib/java/DBBench-1.3.jar tango-9.3.3/lib/java/Astor-7.2.7.jar 
> tango-9.3.3/lib/java/ATKWidget-9.3.6.jar 
> tango-9.3.3/lib/java/ATKTuning-4.7.jar tango-9.3.3/lib/java/ATKPanel-5.8.jar 
> tango-9.3.3/lib/java/ATKCore-9.3.6.jar subprocess returned exit status 2
> gbp:error: Uscan failed - debug by running 'uscan --verbose'
> 
> 
> The copyright file  exclude all the .jar files from the sources. So I do not 
> undrrstand why tar complain about these missing files.
It cannot delete them because they are not there.

-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

uscan of the tango package

2019-08-25 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel 
Hello,

When I try to import the new tango[1] sources with

gbp import-orig -uscan

I get this error

:~/Debian/tango/tango$ LANG=C gbp import-orig --uscan
gbp:info: Launching uscan...
tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/RestServer-1.14.jar: Not found in archive
tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/Pogo-9.6.23.jar: Not found in archive
tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/LogViewer-2.0.5.jar: Not found in archive
tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/Jive-7.22.jar: Not found in archive
tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/JTango-9.5.15.jar: Not found in archive
tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/JSSHTerminal-1.16.jar: Not found in archive
tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/DBBench-1.3.jar: Not found in archive
tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/Astor-7.2.7.jar: Not found in archive
tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/ATKWidget-9.3.6.jar: Not found in archive
tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/ATKTuning-4.7.jar: Not found in archive
tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/ATKPanel-5.8.jar: Not found in archive
tar: tango-9.3.3/lib/java/ATKCore-9.3.6.jar: Not found in archive
tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors
uscan: error: tar --delete tango-9.3.3/lib/java/RestServer-1.14.jar 
tango-9.3.3/lib/java/Pogo-9.6.23.jar tango-9.3.3/lib/java/LogViewer-2.0.5.jar 
tango-9.3.3/lib/java/Jive-7.22.jar tango-9.3.3/lib/java/JTango-9.5.15.jar 
tango-9.3.3/lib/java/JSSHTerminal-1.16.jar tango-9.3.3/lib/java/DBBench-1.3.jar 
tango-9.3.3/lib/java/Astor-7.2.7.jar tango-9.3.3/lib/java/ATKWidget-9.3.6.jar 
tango-9.3.3/lib/java/ATKTuning-4.7.jar tango-9.3.3/lib/java/ATKPanel-5.8.jar 
tango-9.3.3/lib/java/ATKCore-9.3.6.jar subprocess returned exit status 2
gbp:error: Uscan failed - debug by running 'uscan --verbose'


The copyright file  exclude all the .jar files from the sources. So I do not 
undrrstand why tar complain about these missing files.

Cheers

Frederic

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/tango.git