Bug#995010: RFS: spice-gtk/0.39-3 -- [ITA] GTK3 widget for SPICE clients (development files)
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "spice-gtk": * Package name: spice-gtk Version : 0.39-3 Upstream Author : Victor Toso * URL : https://www.spice-space.org/ * License : LGPL-2.1+ and MIT, BSD-3-clause, LGPL-2.0+, GPL-2.0+, LGPL-2.1+, MIT, other * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/spice-gtk Section : misc It builds those binary packages: libspice-client-gtk-3.0-dev - GTK3 widget for SPICE clients (development files) gir1.2-spiceclientgtk-3.0 - GTK3 widget for SPICE clients (GObject-Introspection) libspice-client-gtk-3.0-5 - GTK3 widget for SPICE clients (runtime library) libspice-client-glib-2.0-dev - GObject for communicating with Spice servers (development files) gir1.2-spiceclientglib-2.0 - GObject for communicating with Spice servers (GObject-Introspection) libspice-client-glib-2.0-8 - GObject for communicating with Spice servers (runtime library) spice-client-glib-usb-acl-helper - Helper tool to validate usb ACLs spice-client-gtk - Simple clients for interacting with SPICE servers To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/spice-gtk/ Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/spice-gtk/spice-gtk_0.39-3.dsc Changes since the last upload: spice-gtk (0.39-3) unstable; urgency=medium . * debian/control: Increased debhelper-compat to 13 * debian/control: New maintainer * debian/control: Specified rules don't require root * debian/copyright: Added upstream author * debian/copyright: New maintainer * debian/libspice-client-glib-2.0-8.symbols: Added 0.39 symbols * debian/upstream/metadata: Added upstream metadata There are some open bugs I'll have fixed in future uploads. Regards, Lance Lin GPG Fingerprint: 8CAD 1250 8EE0 3A41 7223 03EC 7096 F91E D75D 028F signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#994912: Re: Bug#994912: RFS: pyupgrade/2.24.0-1 [RFP] -- Tool to automatically upgrade Python 3 syntax for newer versions
Hello zigo, thanks for your review. Wrote a lot but trimmed it down. Dependency chain goes to tokenize-rt. I'll get it packaged and RFS later -Josh
Salsa repository access for usbredir and btcheck
Dear Mentors, Can someone please give me access to: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/usbredir https://salsa.debian.org/debian/btcheck I recently adopted both packages and have some changes I need to merge. My repositories are here: https://salsa.debian.org/linqigang/usbredir https://salsa.debian.org/linqigang/btcheck Thanks, Lance Lin GPG Fingerprint: 8CAD 1250 8EE0 3A41 7223 03EC 7096 F91E D75D 028F signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Removing repositories from salsa.debian.org/debian
On 2021-09-24 16:14, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 03:16:34PM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote: >> I have created repositories under salsa.debian.org/debian, and later >> pushed their contents to repositories in another group (I should have >> transferred instead). Could someone with appropriate privileges remove >> them?: > The process is to open a ticket in > https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/support Thanks for the pointer! Best, Andrius
Re: Removing repositories from salsa.debian.org/debian
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 03:16:34PM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote: > I have created repositories under salsa.debian.org/debian, and later > pushed their contents to repositories in another group (I should have > transferred instead). Could someone with appropriate privileges remove > them?: The process is to open a ticket in https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/support -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Removing repositories from salsa.debian.org/debian
Hello, I have created repositories under salsa.debian.org/debian, and later pushed their contents to repositories in another group (I should have transferred instead). Could someone with appropriate privileges remove them?: debian/libemf2svg debian/libuemf Best, Andrius OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#994912: RFS: pyupgrade/2.24.0-1 [RFP] -- Tool to automatically upgrade Python 3 syntax for newer versions
On 9/23/21 3:43 AM, Joshua Peisach wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyupgrade": > > * Package name : pyupgrade > Version : 2.24.0-1 > Upstream Author : Anthony Sottile > * URL : https://github.com/asottile/pyupgrade > * License : MIT > * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pyupgrade > Section : devel > > It builds those binary packages: > > pyupgrade - Tool to automatically upgrade Python 3 syntax for newer versions > > To access further information about this package, please visit the following > URL: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/pyupgrade/ > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pyupgrade/pyupgrade_2.24.0-1.dsc > > Changes for the initial release: > > pyupgrade (2.24.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium > . > * Initial packaging > * Fix lintian issues, cleanup and add a few extra essentials > . > * Initial release (Closes: #988658) > > Regards, > -- > Joshua Peisach Hi Joshua, Here's my review. 1/ override_dh_auto_clean Instead of overriding dh_auto_clean, it'd be nicer to add: extend-diff-ignore = "^[^/]*[.]egg-info/" to debian/source/options. In fact, you have it there already, so why attempting to clean the egg-info? 2/ debian/gbp.conf Please remove the file completely. It's annoying to maintain. One can simply use: ignore-branch = True in ~/.gbp.conf instead. 3/ debian/copyright This isn't mandatory, but I strongly advise to use the same license as upstream for your packaging. Is there a good reason why you wrote debian/* in GPL-2+ instead of Expat like upstream? 4/ debian/control Please run "wrap-and-sort -bastk" to clean-up indentation in d/control. The package has, in setup.cfg: install_requires = tokenize-rt>=3.2.0 however, you do not (build-)depends on it. Can you fix this? You probably will have to package it too (since I didn't find it in Debian). 5/ debian/changelog Please only write a single entry there: Initial release (Closes: #988658) and nothing more. Let me know when all of the above is fixed, and I'll review the package again for sponsoring. Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Re: RFS: looking for a sponsor to upgrade mg (repost)
On 2021-09-22 15:04:43, Hilmar Preuße wrote: Please refer to the mentors FAQ: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#How_do_I_get_a_sponsor_for_my_package.3F Hilmar The package is already in Debian, but the previous sponsor did not reply to my EMail. Regards Harri
Bug#994968: Subject: RFS: simple-image-filter/1.0.9-1 [ITP] -- Image processing software
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "simple-image-filter": * Package name: simple-image-filter Version : 1.0.9-1 Upstream Author : https://github.com/dependon/simple-image-filter/issues * URL : https://github.com/dependon/simple-image-filter * License : GPL-3+ * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/Dami/simple-image-filter Section : utils It builds those binary packages: simple-image-filter - Image processing software To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/simple-image-filter/ Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/simple-image-filter/simple-image-filter_1.0.9-1.dsc Changes for the initial release: simple-image-filter (1.0.9-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Initial release (Closes: #994243) Regards, -- Lu YaNing
