Bug#1011313: RFS: python-decouple/3.6-3 -- Helps you to organize your Django/Flask settings
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-decouple": * Package name: python-decouple Version : 3.6-3 Upstream Author : Henrique Bastos * URL : https://github.com/henriquebastos/python-decouple * License : MIT * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/python-decouple Section : python The source builds the following binary packages: python3-decouple - Helps you to organize your Django/Flask settings To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-decouple/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-decouple/python-decouple_3.6-3.dsc Or, the git repository (forked from the main branch): https://salsa.debian.org/zaharazod/python-decouple.git Changes since the last upload: python-decouple (3.6-3) unstable; urgency=medium . * copyright fixes * lintian fixes * new upstream version (3.6) Regards, -- Matt Barry
Bug#1011311: RFS: colordiff/1.0.20-1 -- tool to colorize 'diff' output
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "colordiff": * Package name: colordiff Version : 1.0.20-1 Upstream Author : Dave Ewart da...@sungate.co.uk * URL : http://www.colordiff.org/ * License : GPL-2+ * Vcs : https://github.com/daveewart/colordiff Section : text The source builds the following binary packages: colordiff - tool to colorize 'diff' output To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/colordiff/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/colordiff/colordiff_1.0.20-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: colordiff (1.0.20-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release. * Minor packaging tidying. * Updates standards version to 4.6.0, added Rules-Require-Root. Background: I've been developing 'colordiff' for more than 20 years, but in the Debian ecosystem I've never uploaded the packages myself. Rather I've been building the packages and various individuals have sponsored the uploads. However my most recent sponsor Colin Tuckley (since 2007) is no longer able to do so. Regards, -- Dave Ewart, da...@sungate.co.uk
Bug#1001757: marked as done (RFS: google-android-installers/1652777492 [NMU] -- Google's Android SDK)
Your message dated Fri, 20 May 2022 00:32:25 +0900 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1001757: RFS: google-android-installers/1639148153 [NMU] -- Google's Android SDK has caused the Debian Bug report #1001757, regarding RFS: google-android-installers/1652777492 [NMU] -- Google's Android SDK to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1001757: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1001757 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for package "google-android-installers": * Package name: google-android-installers Version : 1639148153 Upstream Author : Google * URL : https://developer.android.com/about/index.html * License : https://developer.android.com/studio/terms * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/android-tools-team/google-android-installers Section : contrib/devel It builds those binary packages: google-android-build-tools-24.0.2-installer - Google's Android SDK Build- Tools 24.0.2 Installer (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx) google-android-build-tools-24.0.3-installer - Google's Android SDK Build- Tools 24.0.3 Installer (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx) google-android-build-tools-25.0.0-installer - Google's Android SDK Build- Tools 25 Installer (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx) google-android-build-tools-25.0.1-installer - Google's Android SDK Build- Tools 25.0.1 Installer (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx) google-android-build-tools-25.0.2-installer - Google's Android SDK Build- Tools 25.0.2 Installer (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx) google-android-build-tools-25.0.3-installer - Google's Android SDK Build- Tools 25.0.3 Installer (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx) google-android-build-tools-26.0.0-installer - Google's Android SDK Build- Tools 26 Installer (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx) google-android-build-tools-26.0.1-installer - Google's Android SDK Build- Tools 26.0.1 Installer (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx) google-android-build-tools-26.0.2-installer - Google's Android SDK Build- Tools 26.0.2 Installer (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx) google-android-build-tools-26.0.3-installer - Google's Android SDK Build- Tools 26.0.3 Installer (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx) google-android-build-tools-27.0.0-installer - Google's Android SDK Build- Tools 27 Installer (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx) google-android-build-tools-27.0.1-installer - Google's Android SDK Build- Tools 27.0.1 Installer (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx) google-android-build-tools-27.0.2-installer - Google's Android SDK Build- Tools 27.0.2 Installer (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx) google-android-build-tools-27.0.3-installer - Google's Android SDK Build- Tools 27.0.3 Installer (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx) google-android-build-tools-28.0.0-installer - Google's Android SDK Build- Tools 28 Installer (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx) google-android-build-tools-28.0.1-installer - Google's Android SDK Build- Tools 28.0.1 Installer (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx) google-android-build-tools-28.0.2-installer - Google's Android SDK Build- Tools 28.0.2 Installer (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx) google-android-build-tools-28.0.3-installer - Google's Android SDK Build- Tools 28.0.3 Installer (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx) google-android-build-tools-29.0.0-installer - Google's Android SDK Build- Tools 29 Installer (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx) google-android-build-tools-29.0.1-installer - Google's Android SDK Build- Tools 29.0.1 Installer (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx) google-android-build-tools-29.0.2-installer - Google's Android SDK Build- Tools 29.0.2 Installer (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx) google-android-build-tools-29.0.3-installer - Google's Android SDK Build- Tools 29.0.3 Installer (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx) google-android-build-tools-30.0.0-installer - Google's Android SDK Build- Tools 30 Installer (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx) google-android-build-tools-30.0.1-installer - Google's Android SDK Build- Tools 30.0.1 Installer (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx) google-android-build-tools-30.0.2-installer - Google's Android SDK Build- Tools 30.0.2 Installer (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx) google-android-build-tools-30.0.3-installer - Google's Android SDK Build- Tools 30.0.3 Installer (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx) google-android-build-tools-31.0.0-installer - Google's Android SDK Build- Tools 31 Installer (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx) google-android-build-tools-32.0.0-installer - Google's Android SDK Build- Tools 32 Installer (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx) google-android-patcher-4-installer - Google's SDK Patch Applier v4 Installer
Bug#1011087: RFS: libshout-idjc/2.4.4-1 -- broadcast streaming library with IDJC extensions
Control: reopen -1 On Wed, 18 May 2022 20:30:39 +0200 Dennis Braun wrote: Ok thx, uploaded again.
Bug#1001757: RFS: google-android-installers/1639148153 [NMU] -- Google's Android SDK
Dear Fab, Thanks for your work! I already merged your MR to debian/exp branch. Since there're 128 commits / patches for your one MR, it's actually not possible for me to review deeply. So I'd prefer to upload to experimental first. Your upload to mentors seems to have some more commits / patches than MR. So please make another MR to release all your patches to salsa. After that I can sponsor the upload to experimental. Cheers, Roger On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 6:59 PM Roger Shimizu wrote: > > Dear Bastian, > > Thanks for the ping! > I'll check this package later. > > Cheers, > Roger > > On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 2:09 AM Bastian Germann wrote: > > > > Hi Roger and List, > > > > Can you please comment on this and your plans on the > > google-android-installers package? > > This is from sponsorship-requests and nobody cared about it in months. > > I am not familiar with the Android build system. > > > > Hans-Christoph has commented on the Salsa MR to possibly make Fab Stz the > > new package maintainer. > > > > Thanks, > > Bastian > > > > On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 14:13:32 +0100 Fab Stz wrote: > > > I already sent an email on 21/Oct & 19/Nov to android-tools- > > > de...@lists.alioth.debian.org, Roger Shimizu > > concerning a > > > merge request for that package. I haven't seen an anwser yet. > > > > > > Message was: > > > Hello everybody, > > > > > > I updated the google-android-installers source package and created a > > merge > > > request available here: > > > > > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/android-tools-team/google-android-installers/-/merge_requests/3 > > > > > > It automatically builds packages for almost all SDK components described > > in > > > Google's https://dl.google.com/android/repository/repository2-1.xml > > > > > > Among the covered components there is: build-tools, platforms, > > platform-tools, > > > cmdline-tools, emulator, ndk, sources. > > > > > > Could you have a look and give any feedback please? > > > > > > Once merged & approved, this is ready to be reused with the other SDK > > > repositories of Google. It will permit to create source packages for > > these > > > components: sys-img, add-on, extras...
Re: quilt patch (hunk ignored)
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 04:21:42PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 07:17:11PM +0800, Bo YU wrote: > > But if use the same way to apply patch into d/*, sometime it will get: > Patches shouldn't patch files in debian/. Edit the files directly. Understood it. here is SO[0] to hint it. But this is inconvenient: *shrug* * if to modify many files in d/* or code snip and want to keep a clean status to watch different parts on many times modify. Not sure what does this mean but it's possible that a VCS can help here. * send these modify to the package's maintainer You should send a debdiff, not a patch from debian/patches/. Ok, got it. thank you:) BR, Bo -- WBR, wRAR
Re: quilt patch (hunk ignored)
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 07:17:11PM +0800, Bo YU wrote: > > > But if use the same way to apply patch into d/*, sometime it will get: > > Patches shouldn't patch files in debian/. Edit the files directly. > > > Understood it. here is SO[0] to hint it. > > But this is inconvenient: *shrug* > * if to modify many files in d/* or code snip and want to keep a clean status > to watch different parts on many times modify. Not sure what does this mean but it's possible that a VCS can help here. > * send these modify to the package's maintainer You should send a debdiff, not a patch from debian/patches/. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: quilt patch (hunk ignored)
Hi wRAR, On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 04:00:40PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 06:57:27PM +0800, Bo YU wrote: Hi, I followed the instructions[0]&[1] to generate/apply patch. It is ok if i the patch file be applied out of debian/*.: // for people who if need it *quilt push -a * quilt new fix-issue.patch * quilt add source-code-file(out of the d/*) * quilt refresh * quilt header -e * quilt pop -a But if use the same way to apply patch into d/*, sometime it will get: Patches shouldn't patch files in debian/. Edit the files directly. Understood it. here is SO[0] to hint it. But this is inconvenient: * if to modify many files in d/* or code snip and want to keep a clean status to watch different parts on many times modify. * send these modify to the package's maintainer Thank you~ BR, Bo [0]: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29634868/adding-a-file-in-a-quilt-dquilt-patch-patch-applies-correctly-by-hand-but-brea -- WBR, wRAR
Re: quilt patch (hunk ignored)
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 06:57:27PM +0800, Bo YU wrote: > Hi, > > I followed the instructions[0]&[1] to generate/apply patch. It is ok if i > the patch file be applied out of debian/*.: > > // for people who if need it > *quilt push -a > * quilt new fix-issue.patch > * quilt add source-code-file(out of the d/*) > * quilt refresh > * quilt header -e > * quilt pop -a > > But if use the same way to apply patch into d/*, sometime it will get: Patches shouldn't patch files in debian/. Edit the files directly. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
quilt patch (hunk ignored)
Hi, I followed the instructions[0]&[1] to generate/apply patch. It is ok if i the patch file be applied out of debian/*.: // for people who if need it *quilt push -a * quilt new fix-issue.patch * quilt add source-code-file(out of the d/*) * quilt refresh * quilt header -e * quilt pop -a But if use the same way to apply patch into d/*, sometime it will get: ``` vimer@unmatched-local:~/ sudo sbuild -c sid-riscv64-sbuild --no-clean-source dpkg-source: info: using source format '3.0 (quilt)' dpkg-source: info: building waypipe using existing ./waypipe_0.8.2.orig.tar.gz dpkg-source: info: using patch list from debian/patches/series patching file debian/rules Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored dpkg-source: info: the patch has fuzz which is not allowed, or is malformed dpkg-source: info: if patch 'fix-ftbfs-riscv64.patch' is correctly applied by quilt, use 'quilt refresh' to update it dpkg-source: info: if the file is present in the unpacked source, make sure it is also present in the orig tarball dpkg-source: error: LC_ALL=C patch -t -F 0 -N -p1 -u -V never -E -b -B .pc/fix-ftbfs-riscv64.patch/ --reject-file=- < waypipe-0.8.2.orig.J2h0OD/debian/patches/fix-ftbfs-riscv64.patch subprocess returned exit status 1 ``` I suspect the sbuild has switch can control it but i do not find it. I can apply the such patches like: ``` patch -p1 < ~/Fix_ftbfs.patch patching file debian/rules ``` But imagine if one patch will contain two files to modfy: one file is d/rules and the other is CMakelist.txt. This is common usage to fix something, how did it? Thank you, Bo [0]: https://raphaelhertzog.com/2011/07/04/how-to-prepare-patches-for-debian-packages/ [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/UsingQuilt
Bug#1001757: RFS: google-android-installers/1639148153 [NMU] -- Google's Android SDK
Dear Bastian, Thanks for the ping! I'll check this package later. Cheers, Roger On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 2:09 AM Bastian Germann wrote: > > Hi Roger and List, > > Can you please comment on this and your plans on the > google-android-installers package? > This is from sponsorship-requests and nobody cared about it in months. > I am not familiar with the Android build system. > > Hans-Christoph has commented on the Salsa MR to possibly make Fab Stz the new > package maintainer. > > Thanks, > Bastian > > On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 14:13:32 +0100 Fab Stz wrote: > > I already sent an email on 21/Oct & 19/Nov to android-tools- > > de...@lists.alioth.debian.org, Roger Shimizu concerning a > > merge request for that package. I haven't seen an anwser yet. > > > > Message was: > > Hello everybody, > > > > I updated the google-android-installers source package and created a merge > > request available here: > > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/android-tools-team/google-android-installers/-/merge_requests/3 > > > > It automatically builds packages for almost all SDK components described in > > Google's https://dl.google.com/android/repository/repository2-1.xml > > > > Among the covered components there is: build-tools, platforms, > platform-tools, > > cmdline-tools, emulator, ndk, sources. > > > > Could you have a look and give any feedback please? > > > > Once merged & approved, this is ready to be reused with the other SDK > > repositories of Google. It will permit to create source packages for these > > components: sys-img, add-on, extras...
Bug#983146: 983146 RFS: bung/3.2.5-2 [ITP] -- backup next generation
Dear Bastian Thank you for your help The debian/changelog file's UNRELEASED has been changed to unstable Best Charles
