Bug#1014147: RFS: tintin++/2.02.20-1 [QA] -- classic text-based MUD client
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tintin++": * Package name: tintin++ Version : 2.02.20-1 Upstream Author : Igor van den Hoven * URL : http://tintin.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL-2 Section : games The source builds the following binary packages: tintin++ - classic text-based MUD client To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/tintin++/ Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tintin++/tintin++_2.02.20-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: tintin++ (2.02.20-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release. * Add patch: regular expressions now use libpcre2-dev. (Closes: #40) Regards, -- Jozsef Nagy
Bug#1014138: marked as done (RFS: dmidecode/3.4-1 -- SMBIOS/DMI table decoder)
Your message dated Thu, 30 Jun 2022 21:51:46 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS: dmidecode/3.4-1 -- SMBIOS/DMI table decoder has caused the Debian Bug report #1014138, regarding RFS: dmidecode/3.4-1 -- SMBIOS/DMI table decoder to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1014138: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1014138 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dmidecode": Package name: dmidecode Version : 3.4-1 Upstream Author : dmidecode-de...@nongnu.org URL : https://nongnu.org/dmidecode/ License : GPL-2+ Vcs : https://jff.email/cgit/dmidecode.git/ Section : utils The source builds the following binary packages: dmidecode - SMBIOS/DMI table decoder dmidecode-udeb - SMBIOS/DMI table decoder (udeb) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/dmidecode/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dmidecode/dmidecode_3.4-1.dsc or from git https://jff.email/cgit/dmidecode.git/?h=release%2Fdebian%2F3.4-1 Changes since the last upload: dmidecode (3.4-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release. - Remove upstream applied patches: + debian/patches/0145-Fix_condition_error_in_ascii_filter.patch + debian/patches/0150-Fix_crash.patch - Refresh upstream signing key. * Declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.6.1.0 (No changes needed). * debian/copyright: - Add year 2022 to myself. CU Jörg -- New: GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB 30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D GPG Key: 8CA1D25D CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56 Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked since 2014-12-31). Jörg Frings-Fürst D-54470 Lieser git: https://jff.email/cgit/ Threema: SYR8SJXB Wire: @joergfringsfuerst Skype: joergpenguin Ring: jff Telegram: @joergfringsfuerst My wish list: - Please send me a picture from the nature at your home. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Thanks for the update!--- End Message ---
Bug#1012196: buglist
As you have closed #672574 and #726559 via BTS already for a different version please remove them from the changelog. On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 05:10:41 + andre-fle...@posteo.de wrote: I had a look at all issues. That three bugs you mentioned are either fixed (#785897) or unreproducible (#726559, #672574). Same with the other bugs on https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?repeatmerged=no=exaile How should I write the changelog to close unreproducible or fixed bugs? Am 11.06.22 um 10:24 schrieb Bastian Germann: > On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 16:32:40 + andre-fle...@posteo.de wrote: >> I added all issues to changelog as Closes. > > Have you really had a look at them? You do not just close them with no > comment in your changelog. > When you have verified the three bugs that I mentioned, please have > them in the line: > > * Beta release for Exaile 4.1.2 (Closes: #785897, #726559, #672574) > > For the others: Please only add them when you are sure they are resolved. > If you are not sure or you do not have the time for them, please leave > them untouched.
Bug#1014138: RFS: dmidecode/3.4-1 -- SMBIOS/DMI table decoder
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dmidecode": Package name: dmidecode Version : 3.4-1 Upstream Author : dmidecode-de...@nongnu.org URL : https://nongnu.org/dmidecode/ License : GPL-2+ Vcs : https://jff.email/cgit/dmidecode.git/ Section : utils The source builds the following binary packages: dmidecode - SMBIOS/DMI table decoder dmidecode-udeb - SMBIOS/DMI table decoder (udeb) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/dmidecode/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dmidecode/dmidecode_3.4-1.dsc or from git https://jff.email/cgit/dmidecode.git/?h=release%2Fdebian%2F3.4-1 Changes since the last upload: dmidecode (3.4-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release. - Remove upstream applied patches: + debian/patches/0145-Fix_condition_error_in_ascii_filter.patch + debian/patches/0150-Fix_crash.patch - Refresh upstream signing key. * Declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.6.1.0 (No changes needed). * debian/copyright: - Add year 2022 to myself. CU Jörg -- New: GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB 30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D GPG Key: 8CA1D25D CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56 Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked since 2014-12-31). Jörg Frings-Fürst D-54470 Lieser git: https://jff.email/cgit/ Threema: SYR8SJXB Wire: @joergfringsfuerst Skype: joergpenguin Ring: jff Telegram: @joergfringsfuerst My wish list: - Please send me a picture from the nature at your home. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1014131: RFS: ario/1.6.1-1 -- GTK+ client for the Music Player Daemon (MPD)
Hi Marc, I can imagine sponsoring this if you convert d/copyright to https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ Cheers, Bastian
Bug#1014131: RFS: ario/1.6.1-1 -- GTK+ client for the Music Player Daemon (MPD)
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ario": * Package name: ario Version : 1.6.1-1 Upstream Author : Marc Pavot * URL : https://github.com/mpavot/ario * License : GPL * Vcs : ? Section : sound The source builds the following binary packages: ario - GTK+ client for the Music Player Daemon (MPD) ario-common - GTK+ client for the Music Player Daemon (MPD) (Common files) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/ario/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/ario/ario_1.6.1-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: ario (1.6.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New updstream release * Remove dependency on dbus-glib (Closes: #955872) * Make build reproducible (Closes: 828876) Regards, -- Marc Pavot
Bug#1014117: RFS: edgar/1.35-1 [ITA] -- Legend of Edgar platform game
Am 30.06.22 um 17:23 schrieb Matt Barry: To clarify, I think that I rebased the upstream merge and debian/ changes into a single commit, which should be separate? (That makes sense to me, just making sure.) Right.
Bug#1014117: RFS: edgar/1.35-1 [ITA] -- Legend of Edgar platform game
On Thu, 2022-06-30 at 17:10 +0200, Bastian Germann wrote: > Am 30.06.22 um 17:00 schrieb Matt Barry: > > I'm willing to > > wade through it, but is the position of the project immovably that > > eg. > > ogg files are not redistributable without "source"? (Are there > > examples of packages that actually do this?) > > Please see an example with Photoshop files for pngs at > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1010399#25 > If source files exist they have to be provided. If the ogg files are > the primary form of modification it is okay in my > opinion. You have to do a little research for that. I have not even > checked if the files are still existing with the new > version. Thanks for the reference; I will do some reading. > > The git repo that you have used to build the new version was actually > not used by the former maintainer who got the > pkg into Debian. The version in the archive is completely different. > The git repo should be rebuilt using gbp > import-dscs --debsnap. I can do that for you if you do not know how > to. The archive also holds a seemingly complete > copyright file, which your version lacks. That makes sense; let me see if I can figure it out. > > Also, please separate your debian/ changes from the upstream changes. > That is what master and upstream branches are for. To clarify, I think that I rebased the upstream merge and debian/ changes into a single commit, which should be separate? (That makes sense to me, just making sure.) Thanks! Matt
Bug#1014117: RFS: edgar/1.35-1 [ITA] -- Legend of Edgar platform game
Am 30.06.22 um 17:00 schrieb Matt Barry: I'm willing to wade through it, but is the position of the project immovably that eg. ogg files are not redistributable without "source"? (Are there examples of packages that actually do this?) Please see an example with Photoshop files for pngs at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1010399#25 If source files exist they have to be provided. If the ogg files are the primary form of modification it is okay in my opinion. You have to do a little research for that. I have not even checked if the files are still existing with the new version. The git repo that you have used to build the new version was actually not used by the former maintainer who got the pkg into Debian. The version in the archive is completely different. The git repo should be rebuilt using gbp import-dscs --debsnap. I can do that for you if you do not know how to. The archive also holds a seemingly complete copyright file, which your version lacks. Also, please separate your debian/ changes from the upstream changes. That is what master and upstream branches are for.
Bug#1014117: RFS: edgar/1.35-1 [ITA] -- Legend of Edgar platform game
Hi! On Thu, 2022-06-30 at 16:40 +0200, Bastian Germann wrote: > Hi Matt, > > On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:43:38 -0400 Matt Barry > wrote: > > edgar (1.35-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > . > > * New upstream release (1.35). > > According to the bug report, the new upstream release should close > #985185. Yup, that got lost somewhere along the line.. I will add it back, thanks! > What about #832116? The wrong attribution that is mentioned should be > resolved by the referenced pull request. > If the rest of the bug is not handled the adoption would be futile. Ah, don't know how I missed that one! What a mess.. I'm willing to wade through it, but is the position of the project immovably that eg. ogg files are not redistributable without "source"? (Are there examples of packages that actually do this?) Cheers, Matt
Bug#1014117: RFS: edgar/1.35-1 [ITA] -- Legend of Edgar platform game
Hi Matt, On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:43:38 -0400 Matt Barry wrote: edgar (1.35-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release (1.35). According to the bug report, the new upstream release should close #985185. * New maintainer. Closes: #998116. * URL updates. Closes: #1013412. * Various Lintian updates. * Update and drop patches. Cheers, -- Matt Barry What about #832116? The wrong attribution that is mentioned should be resolved by the referenced pull request. If the rest of the bug is not handled the adoption would be futile. Thanks, Bastian
Bug#1014117: RFS: edgar/1.35-1 [ITA] -- Legend of Edgar platform game
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Greetings mentors! I am looking for a sponsor for my package "edgar": * Package name: edgar Version : 1.35-1 Upstream Author : Richard Sweeney * URL : http://www.parallelrealities.co.uk/games/edgar/ * License : GPL-2.0+ * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/edgar Section : games The source builds the following binary packages: edgar - Legend of Edgar platform game edgar-data - Data files for Legend of Edgar game To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/edgar/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/edgar/edgar_1.35-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: edgar (1.35-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release (1.35). * New maintainer. Closes: #998116. * URL updates. Closes: #1013412. * Various Lintian updates. * Update and drop patches. Cheers, -- Matt Barry signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1014078: RFS: librosa/0.9.2-1 [ITP] -- Python package for music and audio analysis
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Am 30.06.22 um 13:32 schrieb Nilson Silva: now we have to wait for it to upload to debian. Well, it's not yet available. Please untag moreinfo when it is available in sid and you have uploaded a librosa version depending on it.
Bug#1014078: RFS: librosa/0.9.2-1 [ITP] -- Python package for music and audio analysis
Am 30.06.22 um 07:03 schrieb Nilson Silva: However, there is already a bug with no movement in version (0.2.2-1) since 2020. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=968469 There IS movement. The package is now in the NEW queue, as I have already noted there. You have not answered my question why it is not in your librosa's Build-Depends.
Bug#1014078: RFS: librosa/0.9.2-1 [ITP] -- Python package for music and audio analysis
Dear Nelson, Il 30/06/22 07:03, Nilson Silva ha scritto: Hi! Looking at the ITP and setup.cfg, I would have expected python3-resampy (which is in NEW) to show up in the Build-Depends. How come that it is not there? I have the package ready in the most current version (0.3.0-1) ! https://salsa.debian.org/nilsonfsilva/resampy However, there is already a bug with no movement in version (0.2.2-1) since 2020. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=968469 In that case how to do? resampy is already in the NEW queue and it will be hopefully available in few days. You just need to add it to your list of dependencies. P.S.: I will update the resampy package to the latest upstream version as soon as possible. regards -- Antonio Valentino
