Bug#1021744: marked as done (RFS: dwm/6.4-0.1 [NMU] -- dynamic window manager)
Your message dated Fri, 14 Oct 2022 00:37:37 +0200 with message-id <5569edf6-d623-c11e-ea9a-043564bf3...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: dwm/6.4-0.1 [NMU] -- dynamic window manager has caused the Debian Bug report #1021744, regarding RFS: dwm/6.4-0.1 [NMU] -- dynamic window manager to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1021744: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021744 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dwm": * Package name : dwm Version : 6.4-0.1 * URL : https://dwm.suckless.org/ * License : Expat * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/hle/dwm Section : x11 The source builds the following binary packages: dwm - dynamic window manager To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/dwm/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dwm/dwm_6.4-0.1.dsc Changes since the last upload: dwm (6.4-0.1) unstable; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload. * New upstream release. * debian/control: - Bump Standards-Version to 4.6.1. * debian/copyright: - Update copyright for new upstream release. - Update Matteo's email address. * debian/dwm.menu: - Delete menu file due to Technical Committee decision. * debian/icons: - Update dwm.png with upstream one. - Add hicolor scalable icon in places dir (dwm_badge-symbolic.svg) for lightdm-gtk-greeter. * debian/patches/*: - Refresh patches for new upstream release. Regards, -- Matteo Bini --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi Matteo, I think I have already pointed it out on your previous attempts to get a dwm NMU sponsored: You have to address a bug that is not addressed by the maintainer. So there has to be a bug (e.g., asking for a new upstream release) in the first place. I am closing this request. Thanks, Bastian--- End Message ---
Bug#1021744: RFS: dwm/6.4-0.1 [NMU] -- dynamic window manager
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dwm": * Package name : dwm Version : 6.4-0.1 * URL : https://dwm.suckless.org/ * License : Expat * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/hle/dwm Section : x11 The source builds the following binary packages: dwm - dynamic window manager To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/dwm/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dwm/dwm_6.4-0.1.dsc Changes since the last upload: dwm (6.4-0.1) unstable; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload. * New upstream release. * debian/control: - Bump Standards-Version to 4.6.1. * debian/copyright: - Update copyright for new upstream release. - Update Matteo's email address. * debian/dwm.menu: - Delete menu file due to Technical Committee decision. * debian/icons: - Update dwm.png with upstream one. - Add hicolor scalable icon in places dir (dwm_badge-symbolic.svg) for lightdm-gtk-greeter. * debian/patches/*: - Refresh patches for new upstream release. Regards, -- Matteo Bini
Re: Questions about creating package with epoch number
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 03:16:01PM +, Debora Velarde wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have been trying to create an update to an existing package. It currently > doesn't use an epoch number and I need to add one. A couple questions: If the package is for a Debian upload, before doing the bump, please discus it on -devel beforehand. (as per Policy 5.6.12) > 1. Is there a good package that uses an epoch number that I could look to > for an example? > 2. When I create the tarball, would the epoch number be included in the > name of the package subdirectory? > > Thank you, > Debbie > > >
Re: Questions about creating package with epoch number
Hi Debbie, Am 13.10.22 um 17:16 schrieb Debora Velarde: I have been trying to create an update to an existing package. It currently doesn't use an epoch number and I need to add on Just for more contest: Which package are you talking about, and why do you think you'll require to introduce an epoch? A couple questions: 1. Is there a good package that uses an epoch number that I could look to for an example? The package "python-django" comes to my mind, which is now at epoch 3, and also has some explanation in its changelog at https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/p/python-django/python-django_4.1.2-1_changelog. 2. When I create the tarball, would the epoch number be included in the name of the package subdirectory? No, the epoch is just in the debian/changelog and - if you have any dependencies - in debian/control. Best regards, Alexander
Bug#1021708: marked as done (RFS: popt/1.19+dfsg-1 -- lib for parsing cmdline parameters)
Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2022 20:01:53 +0200 with message-id <07932d1e-3dba-9ea8-e6a3-01313d658...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: popt/1.19+dfsg-1 -- lib for parsing cmdline parameters has caused the Debian Bug report #1021708, regarding RFS: popt/1.19+dfsg-1 -- lib for parsing cmdline parameters to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1021708: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021708 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "popt": * Package name : popt Version : 1.19+dfsg-1 Upstream contact : rpm-ma...@lists.rpm.org * URL : https://github.com/rpm-software-management/popt * License : expat * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/popt Section : devel The source builds the following binary packages: libpopt0 - lib for parsing cmdline parameters libpopt-dev - lib for parsing cmdline parameters - development files libpopt0-udeb - lib for parsing cmdline parameters To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/popt/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/popt/popt_1.19+dfsg-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: popt (1.19+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Move from experimental to unstable. * Add fix-reporting-of-test-failures.patch Regards, Håvard --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Am 13.10.22 um 19:08 schrieb Bastian Germann: Forget it; there is no ABI change. I will sponsor later. Done.--- End Message ---
Bug#1021708: RFS: popt/1.19+dfsg-1 -- lib for parsing cmdline parameters
Am 13.10.22 um 19:07 schrieb Bastian Germann: On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 11:09:56 + wrote: Changes since the last upload: popt (1.19+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Move from experimental to unstable. * Add fix-reporting-of-test-failures.patch Have you asked the release team for a transition? Forget it; there is no ABI change. I will sponsor later.
Bug#1021708: RFS: popt/1.19+dfsg-1 -- lib for parsing cmdline parameters
On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 11:09:56 + wrote: Changes since the last upload: popt (1.19+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Move from experimental to unstable. * Add fix-reporting-of-test-failures.patch Have you asked the release team for a transition?
Questions about creating package with epoch number
Hi everyone, I have been trying to create an update to an existing package. It currently doesn't use an epoch number and I need to add one. A couple questions: 1. Is there a good package that uses an epoch number that I could look to for an example? 2. When I create the tarball, would the epoch number be included in the name of the package subdirectory? Thank you, Debbie
Bug#1021727: RFS: gixy/0.1.20-1 [ITP] -- Nginx configuration static analyzer
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gixy". This package was an RFP on the WNPP page. It is currently hosted at: https://salsa.debian.org/linqigang/gixy I left the VCS blank as this package may be a fit for the python team. I am unsure where to place it once it is uploaded but would be happy to change this once it is decided. If not, I would be happy to maintain it on my own. I am not on the python team, but I made sure the package was compliant with the python team standards. * Package name : gixy Version : 0.1.20-1 Upstream contact : Andrew Krasichkov * URL : https://github.com/yandex/gixy * License : Python, MPL-2.0 * Vcs : [fill in URL of packaging vcs] Section : web The source builds the following binary packages: python3-gixy - Nginx configuration static analyzer To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/gixy/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gixy/gixy_0.1.20-1.dsc Changes for the initial release: gixy (0.1.20-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Initial release. (Closes: #997953) Regards, -- https://salsa.debian.org/linqigang/gixy Lance Lin GPG Fingerprint: 4A31 DB5A 1EE4 096C 8739 9880 9036 4929 4C33 F9B7 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1021708: RFS: popt/1.19+dfsg-1 -- lib for parsing cmdline parameters
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "popt": * Package name : popt Version : 1.19+dfsg-1 Upstream contact : rpm-ma...@lists.rpm.org * URL : https://github.com/rpm-software-management/popt * License : expat * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/popt Section : devel The source builds the following binary packages: libpopt0 - lib for parsing cmdline parameters libpopt-dev - lib for parsing cmdline parameters - development files libpopt0-udeb - lib for parsing cmdline parameters To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/popt/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/popt/popt_1.19+dfsg-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: popt (1.19+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Move from experimental to unstable. * Add fix-reporting-of-test-failures.patch Regards, Håvard
