Bug#1025274: RFS: tuxguitar/1.5.6+dfsg1-1 [QA] -- Multitrack guitar tablature editor and player
> ... wasn't the whole idea of Java to be arch independent? That's true, but Tuxguitar comes with some audio modules written in C/C++ (see build-scripts/native-modules/). I was able to cross compile them with aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc etc. on amd64. Next I will try to cross-build the whole package with sbuild (thanks for the links, Lourisvaldo). > The package is marked as UNRELEASED in the changelog, thus explicitly not > for upload. I'll leave further review to someone with a clue about Java > and Maven... The main reason for marking the package as UNRELEASED is the unclear license of the included "Magic Sound Font v2.0"; see the discussion in #819332. I have tried to contact the author by mail, but have not yet received a reply. I will try again, but if it is not possible to resolve this issue, we could omit the file. Tuxguitar also works with other soundbanks already included in Debian.
Bug#1025274: RFS: tuxguitar/1.5.6+dfsg1-1 [QA] -- Multitrack guitar tablature editor and player
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 02:10:32PM +0100, Helmar Gerloni wrote:
> Tuxguitar 1.5 is now built with Maven and comes with build scripts for Linux
> on amd64 (x86_64), i386 (x86) and armv7hl. The differences between the build
> scripts for amd64 and i386 are minor, and for many other architectures
> supported by Debian there are no build scripts at all.
> So my idea was to use the upstream build scripts for amd64 for all
> architectures and modify/patch them so that they hopefully work on all
> architectures supported by Debian.
... wasn't the whole idea of Java to be arch independent?
> This is the reason why i removed all non-amd64 build scripts from the Debian
> sources (among other things).
> But maybe this is not the right way, i don't know. Right now i only have
> amd64
> hardware available, so i can't build on other architectures (cross-compile
> maybe, but that doesn't sound trivial).
While I do have a bunch of hardware to test, and qemu for the rest, I'm
afraid Maven issues are completely out of my expertise areas. Thus, it
seems that someone else will need to help here.
> > Sounds like you missed a build dependency...
> I thought ${maven:CompileDepends} in debian/control handles this build
> dependencies, but somehow it did not work.
> I added some more dependencies to the Build-Depends, so hopefully they are
> complete now.
It builds on amd64 for me, yay!
The package is marked as UNRELEASED in the changelog, thus explicitly not
for upload. I'll leave further review to someone with a clue about Java
and Maven...
Meow!
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Quis trollabit ipsos trollos?
⠈⠳⣄
Bug#1025958: marked as done (RFS: libunistring/1.1-1~experimental2 [RC] -- Unicode string library for C [transitional package])
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2022 00:45:46 +0100 with message-id <7fe52789-b58f-dde1-51f4-767aca326...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: libunistring/1.1-1~experimental2 [RC] -- Unicode string library for C [transitional package] has caused the Debian Bug report #1025958, regarding RFS: libunistring/1.1-1~experimental2 [RC] -- Unicode string library for C [transitional package] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1025958: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1025958 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libunistring": Package name : libunistring Version : 1.1-1~experimental2 Upstream contact : Bruno Haible URL : https://www.gnu.org/software/libunistring/ License : GPL-3+, GPL-2+, LGPL-3+ or GPL-2+, FreeSoftware, GPL-3+ or GFDL-NIV-1.2+, GPL-2+ with distribution exception, GPL-2+ with distribution exception, Expat and GPL-2+, X11 Vcs : https://jff.email/cgit/libunistring.git Section : libs The source builds the following binary packages: libunistring-dev - Unicode string library for C - development files libunistring5 - Unicode string library for C libunistring2 - Unicode string library for C [transitional package] To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/libunistring/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libu/libunistring/libunistring_1.1-1~experimental2.dsc or from git https://jff.email/cgit/libunistring.git/?h=release%2Fdebian%2F1.1-1_experimental2 Changes since the last upload: libunistring (1.1-1~experimental2) experimental; urgency=medium . * debian/control: - libunistring2 (Closes: #1025901): + Change Architecture to all. + Remove Multi-Arch: same. + Add Priority: optional. * debian/rules: - Use DEB_VERSION_UPSTREAM instead of VERSION. CU Jörg -- New: GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB 30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D GPG Key: 8CA1D25D CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56 Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked since 2014-12-31). Jörg Frings-Fürst D-54470 Lieser git: https://jff.email/cgit/ Threema: SYR8SJXB Wire: @joergfringsfuerst Skype: joergpenguin Ring: jff Telegram: @joergfringsfuerst My wish list: - Please send me a picture from the nature at your home. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Thanks for the update.--- End Message ---
Bug#1025959: Feedback regarding RFS: davmail/6.0.1.3390-2
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 05:14:23PM +0100, Alexandre Rossi wrote: > Hi, > > > > The source builds the following binary packages: > > > > > > davmail - POP/IMAP/SMTP/CalDav/LDAP to Microsoft Exchange gateway - GUI > > > davmail-server - POP/IMAP/SMTP/CalDav/LDAP to Microsoft Exchange > > > gateway - headless > > > > The -server package is probably new. > > That's why I need a sponsor. Working on it :-) > > What about D.M. upload privileges? > > I have those, but because the -server package goes through NEW, it does not > apply. > > Cheers and thanks, Feedback: * The packaging git repo is not up to date * Systemd unit file `debian/davmail.service` is not installed in davmail-server (Neither in davmail) * Script `debian/prepare-service` feels wrong if keystore is a file then copy+chown keystore else remove keystore That doesn't make sense Request: * Add the release "davmail (6.0.1.3390-1.1)" to packaging git repo * Review / improve the `prepare-service` * Make that `davmail-service` makes it into `davmail-server` package * Ping me > Alexandre Groeten Geert Stappers -- Silence is hard to parse
Bug#1026037: RFS: gnuit/4.9.5-4 [ITA] [RC] -- GNU Interactive Tools, a file browser/viewer and process viewer/killer
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 04:26:51PM +0100, Josef Schneider wrote: > gnuit (4.9.5-4) unstable; urgency=medium > . >* New maintainer (Closes: #1014171). >* debian/control: > + Update to debhelper-compat version 13 (Closes: #965566). > + Standards-Version 4.6.1. > + Add Rules-Requires-Root: no. > + Add Depends on sensible-utils. > + Remove Build-Depends on autotools-dev. > + Change http to https. >* debian/compat: Deleted. >* debian/copyright: > + Update to dep5 format. > + Update licensing. >* debian/rules: > + Update for debhelper-compat version 13 (Closes: #998945). > + Add configure command to correctly pass --host flag (Closes: #869489). >* debian/patches: Add fix-printf-string.patch to fix FTBFS. >* debian/watch: Update to version 4. >* debian/source: > + Add format file. > + Add lintian-overrides to remove false positive warning. Hi! There's a dropping in /usr/bin : ".gitaction". Looks good otherwise. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Quis trollabit ipsos trollos? ⠈⠳⣄
Bug#1026037: RFS: gnuit/4.9.5-4 [ITA] [RC] -- GNU Interactive Tools, a file browser/viewer and process viewer/killer
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnuit": * Package name : gnuit Version : 4.9.5-4 Upstream contact : Ian Beckwith * URL :https://www.gnu.org/software/gnuit/ * License : MIT, GPL-3+, public-domain, GPL-2+, GFDL-NIV-1.3+ * Vcs :https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnuit.git Section : utils The source builds the following binary packages: gnuit - GNU Interactive Tools, a file browser/viewer and process viewer/killer To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/gnuit/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -xhttps://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnuit/gnuit_4.9.5-4.dsc Changes since the last upload: gnuit (4.9.5-4) unstable; urgency=medium . * New maintainer (Closes: #1014171). * debian/control: + Update to debhelper-compat version 13 (Closes: #965566). + Standards-Version 4.6.1. + Add Rules-Requires-Root: no. + Add Depends on sensible-utils. + Remove Build-Depends on autotools-dev. + Change http to https. * debian/compat: Deleted. * debian/copyright: + Update to dep5 format. + Update licensing. * debian/rules: + Update for debhelper-compat version 13 (Closes: #998945). + Add configure command to correctly pass --host flag (Closes: #869489). * debian/patches: Add fix-printf-string.patch to fix FTBFS. * debian/watch: Update to version 4. * debian/source: + Add format file. + Add lintian-overrides to remove false positive warning. Regards, -- Josef Schneider GPG Fingerprint 3267 0331 DB61 A817 7D25 4D05 5A44 BC12 F2A8 E58F OpenPGP_0x5A44BC12F2A8E58F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
