Bug#1030633: RFS: fdflush/1.0.1.3+nmu1 [NMU] [RC] -- Flush out-of-date disk buffers

2023-02-06 Thread Adam Borowski 
On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 11:10:28PM +0100, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
>  fdflush (1.0.1.3+nmu1) unstable; urgency=medium
>  .
>* Non-maintainer upload.
>* d/rules: Update to debhelper 13 (Closes: #939725, #965520, #999200)
>* d/source: Use 3.0 (native) format
>* d/control: Update standards version to 4.6.2
>* Makefile: Do not force installation with root user
>* d/control: Specify Rules-Requires-Root: no
>* debian/copyright: Update and convert to DEP-5

Hi!
These changes are not something that's fit for a NMU.
On the other hand, a QA upload is long overdue...

Could you please orphan the package?


Meow!
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Let's make a Debian conference in Yalta, Ukraine.
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀
⠈⠳⣄

Bug#1030603: marked as done (RFS: selint/1.4.0-1 [RC] -- Static code analysis of refpolicy style SELinux policies)

2023-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 6 Feb 2023 22:26:10 +0100
with message-id <57be8b40-8af5-7f1d-9f2f-4076d0448...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: selint/1.4.0-1 [RC] -- Static code analysis of 
refpolicy style SELinux policies
has caused the Debian Bug report #1030603,
regarding RFS: selint/1.4.0-1 [RC] -- Static code analysis of refpolicy style 
SELinux policies
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1030603: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030603
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "selint":

 * Package name : selint
   Version  : 1.4.0-1
   Upstream contact : Daniel Burgener 
 * URL  : https://github.com/SELinuxProject/selint
 * License  : Apache-2.0
 * Vcs  : https://salsa.debian.org/selinux-team/selint
   Section  : devel

The source builds the following binary packages:

  selint - Static code analysis of refpolicy style SELinux policies

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/selint/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/selint/selint_1.4.0-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

 selint (1.4.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream version 1.4.0
 .
   * d/watch: use release tarball instead of git tag
   * d/patches: drop upstream applied patches
   * d/copyright: update years
   * d/control: bump to std version 4.6.2 (no further changes)
   * d/clean: drop entries for files removed by upstream
   * d/{control, rules}: skip valgrind on problematic architectures
 (Closes: #1030222)
   * d/clean: also clean generated parser header

Regards,
-- 
  Christian Göttsche
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

Thanks for the update.--- End Message ---

Bug#1030603: RFS: selint/1.4.0-1 [RC] -- Static code analysis of refpolicy style SELinux policies

2023-02-06 Thread Christian Göttsche 
On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 at 01:27, Bastian Germann  wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Feb 2023 15:56:27 +0100 =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_G=C3=B6ttsche?= 
>  wrote:
> >  selint (1.4.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> >  .
> >* New upstream version 1.4.0
> >  .
> >* d/watch: use release tarball instead of git tag
>
> This introduces several new files that are not represented in d/copyright.
> Please fix this.
>
> Also, src/lex.c is auto-generated and should not be included.
> Maybe stay with the git export?

Uploaded a new version to mentors, which imported the upstream source
from the tag again.
To cross-build I annotated the help2man build-dependency with 
(which means the cross-build package does not ship a man page).

New changelog entry:

selint (1.4.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream version 1.4.0
 .
   * d/patches: drop upstream applied ones
   * d/control:
 + bump to std version 4.6.2 (no further changes)
 + skip help2man on cross builds
   * d/clean:
 + drop entries for files removed by upstream
 + also clean generated parser header
   * d/{control, rules}: skip valgrind on problematic architectures
 (Closes: #1030222)
   * d/changelog: update years

Re: Bug#1030265: RFS: ruby-mdl/0.12.0-3 -- Markdown lint tool

2023-02-06 Thread Norwid Behrnd 
> Oif, the man page itself shouldn't be renamed.  As the executable in $PATH
> is "mdl", the man page should be named so.

There was the attempt to resolve the name issue by renaming the package.
Given the freeze a couple of days ahead, the suggest received however was to
defer this *for now*,[1] or to risk that the package won't be considered to
enter stable.  Thus this, and a few other things (e.g., still the «failed to
analyze the VCS repository» is seen, share of the maintainership with the Ruby
Team) remain on my todo, though they better are addressed for the time after
Q2/Q3 of 2023, provided `bookworm` was released.

Thank you for your sponsorship.

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2023/01/msg00058.html