Bug#1031844: RFS: libfilezilla/0.41.1-1 -- build high-performing platform-independent programs (runtime lib)
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libfilezilla": * Package name : libfilezilla Version : 0.41.1-1 Upstream contact : Tim Kosse * URL : https://lib.filezilla-project.org/ * License : GPL-2+ * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libfilezilla Section : libs The source builds the following binary packages: libfilezilla-dev - build high-performing platform-independent programs (development) libfilezilla-common - build high-performing platform-independent programs (translations) libfilezilla35 - build high-performing platform-independent programs (runtime lib) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/libfilezilla/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libf/libfilezilla/libfilezilla_0.41.1-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: libfilezilla (0.41.1-1) experimental; urgency=medium . * New upstream version 0.41.1 * Soname bump rename package to libfilezilla35 Regards Phil -- *** Playing the game for the games own sake. *** Associations: * Debian Maintainer (DM) * Fedora/EPEL Maintainer. * Contributor member of the AlmaLinux foundation. WWW: https://kathenas.org Buy Me a Coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Twitter: @kathenasorg Instagram: @kathenasorg IRC: kathenas GPG: 724AA9B52F024C8B signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1031382: Re: Bug#1031382: RFS: libkysdk-base/1.0.1-1 [ITP] -- Kylin SDK basic library
Hi,
在 2023-02-22星期三的 17:25 +0800，Kevin Duan写道：
> HI!
>
> Thanks for the heads up, I have fixed this issue in the latest version and
> have also uploaded the latest to mentors.
> URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/libkysdk-base/
> Version: 1.0.1-3
>
> Thanks！
> KevinDuan
Several issues that need fix:
* Since your package has not entered Debian officially, please do not
increase the revision number. In your next source package provided, please
still use 1.0.1-1 as version number, not 1.0.1-4. Please only increase
revision numbers after your package is officially accepted into Debian
archive.
* For packages that only contains development headers (*-dev), they do not
include shared library files. As a result, the dependency substitution
${shlibs:Depends} is absolutely not needed. Please drop these lines from
debian/control file. However: please do not delete ${shlibs:Depends}
substitution from packages that actually contains shared library file.
* Compared with your previous 1.0.1-1 upload, the current packaging will
directly place header files under /usr/include/ instead of placing them
under subdirectories. While this behavior does not directly conflict with
packaging policy, I will have to let you know that your packaging is likely
to be problematic, buggy and will cause issues in the futures. For example
in the future libkysdk-system packaging
at https://mentors.debian.net/package/libkysdk-system/, some file (e.g.,
src/systeminfo/libkysisinfo.c) will look for header in , not /usr/include/cstring-extension.h. This means
that libkysdk-system will break when being built in the future. Please,
carefully review your packaging decision again; if you are sure that current
packaging is acceptable, I can upload it as-is. Otherwise I recommend you to
review the decision on header file path.
Thanks,
Boyuan Yang
> 在2023年02月22 06时34分，"Boyuan Yang"写道：
> >
> > Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
> >
> > Indeed, please fix the error listed below before we can proceed.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Boyuan Yang
> >
> > On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 19:55:44 +0100 Adam Borowski
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 11:05:42AM +0800, kevin wrote:
> > > > * Package name : libkysdk-base
> > > > Version : 1.0.1-1
> > >
> > > > libkysdk-base (1.0.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> > > > .
> > > > * Initial release. (Closes: #1031344)
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > > Alas, the package fails to build:
> > >
> > > .
> > > dh_missing: warning: etc/kysdk/kysdk-base/kylog-rotate-default exists
> > > in
> > debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere (related file:
> > "src/log/kylog-
> > rotate-default")
> > > dh_missing: warning: usr/include/kysdk/kysdk-base/libkylog.h exists in
> > debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere (related file:
> > "src/log/libkylog.h")
> > > dh_missing: warning: usr/include/kysdk/kysdk-base/listdata.h exists in
> > debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere (related file:
> > "src/utils/data-
> > structure/linklist/listdata.h")
> > > dh_missing: warning: usr/include/kysdk/kysdk-base/skip_linklist.h
> > > exists
> > in debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere (related file:
> > "src/utils/data-structure/linklist/skip_linklist/skip_linklist.h")
> > > dh_missing: error: missing files, aborting
> > >
> > > While detecting missing files, dh_missing noted some files with
> > > a
> > similar name to those
> > > that were missing. This error /might/ be resolved by replacing
> > references to the
> > > missing files with the similarly named ones that dh_missing
> > > found -
> > assuming the content
> > > is identical.
> > >
> > > As an example, you might want to replace:
> > > * src/log/kylog-rotate-default
> > > with:
> > > * etc/kysdk/kysdk-base/kylog-rotate-default
> > > in a file in debian/ or as argument to one of the dh_* tools
> > > called
> > from debian/rules.
> > > (Note it is possible the paths are not used verbatim but
> > > instead
> > directories
> > > containing or globs matching them are used instead)
> > >
> > > Alternatively, add the missing file to debian/not-installed if
> > > it
> > cannot and should not
> > > be used.
> > >
> > > The following debhelper tools have reported what they installed
> > (with files per package)
> > > * dh_install: libkysdk-base (0), libkysdk-base-dev (1),
> > > libkysdk-
> > config (2), libkysdk-config-dev (3), libkysdk-log (5), libkysdk-log-dev
> > (3),
> > libkysdk-timer (2), libkysdk-timer-dev (3), libkysdk-utils (4),
> > libkysdk-
> > utils-dev (9)
> > > * dh_installdocs: libkysdk-base (0), libkysdk-base-dev (0),
> > libkysdk-config (0), libkysdk-config-dev (0), libkysdk-log (0),
> > libkysdk-
> > log-dev (0), libkysdk-timer (0), libkysdk-timer-dev (0), libkysdk-utils
> > (0),
> > libkysdk-utils-dev (0)
> > > If the missing files are installed by another tool, please file
> > > a
> > bug against it.
> > >
Bug#1031698: RFS: dhcpdump/1.8-5 [QA] -- Parse DHCP packets from tcpdump
Thank you for the considerations made in my review and excellent work with your review. I learned a lot from your work. waiting for a sponsor to upload. On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 2:22 AM Boian Bonev wrote: > Hi, > > First thing to change (after the missing binary) is the description - the > tool > no longer executes and parses tcpdump's output, instead it uses libpcap > directly to get the packets. The man page needs the same correction. > > The build completely ignores the default hardening and optimization flags. > This > breaks both cross and reproducible builds. > > tcpdump should be removed from Depends. > > Isn't it better to depend on libpcap-dev? (libpcap0.7-dev isn't in any > supported release) > > Current standards are 4.6.2. > > d/copyright may benefit from a DEP5 conversion. > > Now I see that there are 3 open bugs, maybe at least two or even all can be > fixed by this upload? > > I have several patches for this tool hanging around since 2013, I did try > to > send them to upstream back then but they either got lost or ignored. All of > them are fixing behavioral bugs. > > I think it is a good idea to add these patches while doing the QA upload. I > need to add the proper headers and will post after an ACK. > > -- > With best regards, > b. >
Bug#1030882: RFS: dbus-c++/0.9.0-11 [QA] -- C++ API for D-Bus
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023, Bastian Germann wrote: Thanks for the QA work! Thank you for that and your support!
Bug#1030882: marked as done (RFS: dbus-c++/0.9.0-11 [QA] -- C++ API for D-Bus)
Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2023 15:48:14 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1030882: RFS: dbus-c++/0.9.0-11 [QA] -- C++ API for D-Bus has caused the Debian Bug report #1030882, regarding RFS: dbus-c++/0.9.0-11 [QA] -- C++ API for D-Bus to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1030882: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030882 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the dbus-c++ package: * Package name : dbus-c++ Version : 0.9.0-11 Upstream contact : * URL or Web page : http://sourceforge.net/projects/dbus-cplusplus/ * License : LGPL-2.1, GPL-3+ * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dbus-cplusplus Section : libs The source builds the following binary packages: libdbus-c++-1-0v5 - C++ API for D-Bus (runtime library with independent main loop) libdbus-c++-bin - C++ API for D-Bus (utilities) libdbus-c++-dev - C++ API for D-Bus (development package) libdbus-c++-doc - C++ API for D-Bus (documentation) libdbus-c++-ecore-1-0 - C++ API for D-Bus (runtime library with Ecore main loop) libdbus-c++-glib-1-0 - C++ API for D-Bus (runtime library with GLib main loop) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/dbus-c++/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dbus-c++/dbus-c++_0.9.0-11.dsc Changes since the last upload: dbus-c++ (0.9.0-11) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium * QA upload. * Add 09_fix_build_order_and_linking.patch to change the order in which the libraries are built and to fix the underlinking issue. (Closes: #889114) * Add 10_prevent_deadlock_on_timeout_expiration.patch to prevent a possible deadlock. (Closes: #956114) * Add 11_fix_MessageIter__copy_data.patch to fix copying nested types in dicts and structs. (LP: #1098723) * Add 12_autoconf_update.patch to avoid hard-to-read deprecation warnings that clutter the build logs. * Update 01_host_name_max.patch because stdio.h is needed by perror(). * debian/control: + Add libdbus-1-dev to libdbus-c++-dev's dependencies. (Closes: #1018771) + Fix spelling and capitalization of the package descriptions. + Put libdbus-c++-ecore-1.so.* and libdbus-c++-glib-1.so.* in their own binary packages libdbus-c++-ecore-1-0 and libdbus-c++-glib-1-0 resp. to avoid pulling in e.g. Ecore libraries (and their dependencies) on systems where these libraries are not needed. (Closes: 1018772) + Mark libdbus-c++-bin as Multi-Arch: allowed. It fixes a regression since version 0.9.0-9. + Add Rules-Requires-Root: no. + Bump Standards-Version to 4.6.2, no changes needed. Mainly, this new version closes all the remaining bugs in Debian and from Launchpad, and it fixes a regression that was introduced by version 0.9.0-9. Therefore, I think it would be good to have it in Debian 12. I already have uploaded all individual commits to Salsa for an easier review. You can find them at: https://salsa.debian.org/uhle/dbus-cplusplus (forked repo) As this is my very first attempt to upload a package to Debian, I certainly need some kind of guidance. I don't know if I should do a merge request on Salsa for instance. But who would respond then? This package has been orphaned. Best regards, Thomas Uhle --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Thanks for the QA work!--- End Message ---
Bug#1031698: RFS: dhcpdump/1.8-5 [QA] -- Parse DHCP packets from tcpdump
Hi, While testing my old patches I needed a clean build and ended fixing most of the problems. Not sharing the result feels like a waste and because there is no git repo to file a PR, I uploaded the whole result on mentors. Take it as a PR and feel free to change the stuff that you don't like. My main objective was to contribute the old patches I made 10 years back but it seems that I overdid it a little bit... ;) -- With best regards, b. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
