Bug#1060388: sponsor for endless-sky

2024-01-16 Thread P. J. McDermott
On 2024-01-17 at 10:22, Bo YU wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> First sorry without contacting here before NMU.

Welcome!

> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "endless-sky":

I'm not a DD, but I gave this a look and have a couple comments.

>  * Vcs  : https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/endless-sky

Do you have an account on Salsa?  You could fork the repository and
submit an MR so that the changes are ready to merge and upload.  If not,
that's OK; I think the changes are small enough for one of us to just
commit in one shot.

>  endless-sky (0.10.4-0.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
>  .
>* Non-maintainer upload.
>* New upstream version 0.10.4. (Closes: #1059987)
>* rebase debian/patches

I see out/troff.patch and out/spelling.patch were applied upstream and
removed from debian/patches/series, but the patch files are still under
debian/patches/.  They should be removed.

>* Change Build-Depends on 'cmake' to'cmake (>= 3.21)'.
>  (Closes: #1054624).

(Coincidentally, seeing this bug on Friday reminded me to do a similar
cmake B-D version bump in another package.)

Other than the suggestions of Git and removing patch files, this looks
OK to me for an NMU.  But of course it needs a DD's review (ideally
Damyan).

Since the changes are apparently not in Git, here's the diff I
reviewed:

 changelog |   10 ++
 control   |2 +-
 patches/atomics.patch |   29 ++---
 patches/series|2 --
 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
---
diff -Naur endless-sky-0.10.2/debian/changelog 
endless-sky-0.10.4/debian/changelog
--- endless-sky-0.10.2/debian/changelog 2023-10-10 10:57:15.0 -0400
+++ endless-sky-0.10.4/debian/changelog 2024-01-07 20:42:17.0 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+endless-sky (0.10.4-0.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * New upstream version 0.10.4. (Closes: #1059987)
+  * rebase debian/patches
+  * Change Build-Depends on 'cmake' to'cmake (>= 3.21)'.
+(Closes: #1054624).
+
+ -- Bo YU   Mon, 08 Jan 2024 09:42:17 +0800
+
 endless-sky (0.10.2-6) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   [ Adrian Bunk ]
diff -Naur endless-sky-0.10.2/debian/control endless-sky-0.10.4/debian/control
--- endless-sky-0.10.2/debian/control   2023-10-06 09:23:26.0 -0400
+++ endless-sky-0.10.4/debian/control   2024-01-07 20:42:17.0 -0500
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 Vcs-Git: https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/endless-sky.git
 Homepage: https://endless-sky.github.io
 Build-Depends:
- cmake,
+ cmake (>= 3.21),
  debhelper-compat (= 13),
  g++ (>=4.6),
  libgl-dev,
diff -Naur endless-sky-0.10.2/debian/patches/atomics.patch 
endless-sky-0.10.4/debian/patches/atomics.patch
--- endless-sky-0.10.2/debian/patches/atomics.patch 2023-10-05 
06:08:09.0 -0400
+++ endless-sky-0.10.4/debian/patches/atomics.patch 2024-01-07 
20:42:17.0 -0500
@@ -1,17 +1,24 @@
-Description: link with libatomic
- On armel and mipsel, there are a bunch of missing __atomic_load_8 symbols
- during linking
- .
- These are provided by libatomic and that is even in the build-dependencies,
- but is missing on the linker command line.
- .
- The right spot to add it is a bit tricky, appending it to SConstrict near
- 'pthread' doesn't seem to have any effect, but adding to CMakeLists.txt works.
-Author: Damyan Ivanov 
+From: Damyan Ivanov 
+Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 07:21:47 +0800
+Subject: link with libatomic
 
+On armel and mipsel, there are a bunch of missing __atomic_load_8 symbols
+during linking
+
+These are provided by libatomic and that is even in the build-dependencies,
+but is missing on the linker command line.
+
+The right spot to add it is a bit tricky, appending it to SConstrict near
+'pthread' doesn't seem to have any effect, but adding to CMakeLists.txt works.
+---
+ CMakeLists.txt | 2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt
+index fa0903a..d7807e9 100644
 --- a/CMakeLists.txt
 +++ b/CMakeLists.txt
-@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ target_link_libraries(ExternalLibraries
+@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ target_link_libraries(ExternalLibraries INTERFACE 
SDL2::SDL2 PNG::PNG JPEG::JPEG
  if(WIN32)
target_link_libraries(ExternalLibraries INTERFACE rpcrt4 Winmm)
  else()
diff -Naur endless-sky-0.10.2/debian/patches/series 
endless-sky-0.10.4/debian/patches/series
--- endless-sky-0.10.2/debian/patches/series2023-10-05 02:53:48.0 
-0400
+++ endless-sky-0.10.4/debian/patches/series2024-01-07 20:42:17.0 
-0500
@@ -1,3 +1 @@
-out/troff.patch
-out/spelling.patch
 atomics.patch
-- 
Patrick "P. J." McDermott:  http://www.pehjota.net/
Lead Developer, ProteanOS:  http://www.proteanos.com/
Founder and CEO, Libiquity: http://www.libiquity.com/



Bug#1060913: Re: Bug#1060913: RFS: sdaps/1.9.11-0.1 [NMU] [RC] -- scripts for data acquisition with paper-based surveys

2024-01-16 Thread Bo YU
Hi!

On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 10:39 PM Dominik George  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Here I am not a member of DebianEdu team and told if am not a member
> > of one team there is no reason to do team upload.
> > Ideally, I should contact the team to join in or tell team I am going
> > to fix ftbfs issue.
>
> Whether the maintainer is a team doesn't matter here (it just means I am
> not responsible alone for the lack of updates on the package, haha ;)).
Ah, I just realized you are the maintainer of the package(as
uploader), many thanks for your work.
>
> In general, you always contact the maintainer for every upload before
> doing an NMU, through the address from the package meta-data or by
> sending your changes to the BTS into the bug you are fixing.

Thanks for reminding me about this.
Before submitting an NMU I basically will give it at a glance from
debian tracker to look at the care/upload frequency of this package is
used to determine if the NMU. Because for some packages that lack
care, there are bugs filed in time, but they may not be resolved for a
long time. But this is only from my experience. I should obey Debian
NMU guidance here.


>
> > But I got no response from there(not DebianEdu
> > team) in the past.
>
> Can you point me to message IDs where you requested changes to be
> uploaded?
Sorry, here I mean I asked for some help on IRC.  The package is here:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060388

I will ping the maintainer of the package again and will fix some
issue like `UNRELEASE` here.
>
> Ideally, you should just send the changes to the BTS bug you are fixing,
> and tag it "patch".
OKay, no problem. Sometimes the debdiff for new upstream release is
very huge and BTS will drop this.:(

Many Thanks again, TIL.

BR,
Bo
>
> -nik



Bug#1061051: RFS: notes-tree/1.2-1 -- a note taking app, which organizes notes in a hierarchical structure

2024-01-16 Thread DS

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "notes-tree":

* Package name : notes-tree
  Version : 1.2-1
  Upstream contact : Dmitry Sviridov <1000hz.radiow...@gmail.com>
* URL : https://gitlab.com/44100Hz/NotesTree/-/tree/dev
* License : Zlib
* Vcs : g...@gitlab.com:44100Hz/NotesTree.git
  Section : editors

The source builds the following binary packages:

  notes-tree - a note taking app, which organizes notes in a 
hierarchical (tree like) structure.


To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  https://gitlab.com/44100Hz/NotesTree/-/tree/dev

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

  dget -x 
https://gitlab.com/44100Hz/NotesTree/-/raw/deb-package/deb-pkg/notes-tree_1.2-1.dsc


Regards,



Bug#1061048: RFS: RPGMod/1.3 ITP -- heyo!

2024-01-16 Thread peq42

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "RPGMod":

* Package name : RPGMod
Version : 1.3.0
Upstream contact : admi...@peq42.com
* URL : http://peq42.com
* License : MIT
* Vcs : https://peq42.com/downloads/RPGmod%20-%20Linux.deb

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


https://peq42.com/projects/rpgmod/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this 
command:


dget -x https://peq42.com/downloads/RPGmod%20-%20Linux.deb

Changes since the last upload:

-Released .DEB

additional comments:
I'm sorry if this e-mail is not exactly perfect or if anything is 
missing, this is my first time packaging and submiting a package to the 
debian store. I setup the package using my personal 
e-mail(gabrielpm2...@gmail.com) and real name(Gabriel), but for the sake 
of lowering spam I get there, if possible, utilize this 
one(admi...@peq42.com) in the store


Regards,
Gabriel

Bug#1060923: RFS: w-scan-cpp/0~20231015-1 [ITA] -- DVB channel scanner (successor of w_scan)

2024-01-16 Thread Phil Wyett
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "w-scan-cpp":

 * Package name : w-scan-cpp
   Version  : 0~20231015-1
   Upstream contact : [fill in name and email of upstream]
 * URL  : https://www.gen2vdr.de/wirbel/w_scan_cpp/index2.html
 * License  : GPL-2.0, GPL-2.0-or-later
 * Vcs  : https://salsa.debian.org/kathenas/w-scan-cpp
   Section  : video

The source builds the following binary packages:

  w-scan-cpp - DVB channel scanner (successor of w_scan)

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/w-scan-cpp/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

  dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/w-scan-cpp/w-scan-cpp_0~20231015-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

 w-scan-cpp (0~20231015-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New maintainer (Closes: #1052444).
   * Disable verbose in 'd/rules'.
   * Changed VCS field data now repo has moved.
 .
   [ Fab Stz ]
   * New upstream version 0~20231015

Note:

Now adoption is complete, this package will be getting significant changes 
below that
means only the minimum has been done for this release.

* Remove third party code and link/use Debian packages.
* Bugs reported upstream and any other issues found.
* Any refactoring where necessary.

Regards

Phil

-- 
Playing the game for the games sake.

Web:

* Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/PhilWyett
* Website: https://kathenas.org
* Social Debian: https://pleroma.debian.social/kathenas/
* Social Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/kathenasorg/




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#1060913: Re: Bug#1060913: RFS: sdaps/1.9.11-0.1 [NMU] [RC] -- scripts for data acquisition with paper-based surveys

2024-01-16 Thread Dominik George
Hi,

> Here I am not a member of DebianEdu team and told if am not a member
> of one team there is no reason to do team upload.
> Ideally, I should contact the team to join in or tell team I am going
> to fix ftbfs issue.

Whether the maintainer is a team doesn't matter here (it just means I am
not responsible alone for the lack of updates on the package, haha ;)).

In general, you always contact the maintainer for every upload before
doing an NMU, through the address from the package meta-data or by
sending your changes to the BTS into the bug you are fixing.

> But I got no response from there(not DebianEdu
> team) in the past.

Can you point me to message IDs where you requested changes to be
uploaded?

Ideally, you should just send the changes to the BTS bug you are fixing,
and tag it "patch".

-nik


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1060913: RFS: sdaps/1.9.11-0.1 [NMU] [RC] -- scripts for data acquisition with paper-based surveys

2024-01-16 Thread Bo YU
Hi!

On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 9:30 PM Dominik George  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> is there a reason why you are not working with the packaging team, and doing 
> NMUs without contacting the team beforehand?

Here I am not a member of DebianEdu team and told if am not a member
of one team there is no reason to do team upload.
Ideally, I should contact the team to join in or tell team I am going
to fix ftbfs issue. But I got no response from there(not DebianEdu
team) in the past.
I would like to follow your advice how to deal with the package or let
the team know the new upstream release will fix the RC problem:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1001643

BR,
Bo
>
> -nik
>



Bug#1060913: RFS: sdaps/1.9.11-0.1 [NMU] [RC] -- scripts for data acquisition with paper-based surveys

2024-01-16 Thread Dominik George
Hi,

is there a reason why you are not working with the packaging team, and doing 
NMUs without contacting the team beforehand?

-nik



Bug#1060913: RFS: sdaps/1.9.11-0.1 [NMU] [RC] -- scripts for data acquisition with paper-based surveys

2024-01-16 Thread Bo YU
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sdaps":

 * Package name : sdaps
   Version  : 1.9.11-0.1
   Upstream contact : Benjamin Berg 
 * URL  : https://sdaps.org
 * License  : GPL-3.0+, LPPL-1.3c
 * Vcs  : https://salsa.debian.org/debian-edu-pkg-team/sdaps
   Section  : science

The source builds the following binary packages:

  sdaps - scripts for data acquisition with paper-based surveys

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/sdaps/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sdaps/sdaps_1.9.11-0.1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

 sdaps (1.9.11-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * New upstream version 1.9.11. (Closes: #1001643)
   * Use libtiff-dev instead of libtiff5-dev.
   * Set std-ver to 4.6.2.
   * Add python3-pkgconfig on B-D.

-- 
Regards,
--
  Bo YU



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1060908: RFS: dh-runit/2.16.2 [RC] -- debhelper add-on to handle runit runscripts

2024-01-16 Thread Lorenzo
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dh-runit":

 * Package name : dh-runit
   Version  : 2.16.2
   Upstream contact : Lorenzo Puliti 
 * URL  : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dh-runit
 * License  : GPL-3+
 * Vcs  : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dh-runit
   Section  : admin

The source builds the following binary packages:

  dh-runit - debhelper add-on to handle runit runscripts
  runit-helper - dh-runit implementation detail

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/dh-runit/

Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this
command:

  dget -x
  https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dh-runit/dh-runit_2.16.2.dsc

Git repo:
  https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dh-runit/-/tree/next?ref_type=heads

Changes since the last upload:

 dh-runit (2.16.2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * dh_runit: stop using given/when.
  + Thanks: gregor herrmann 
  (Closes: #1060709)
   * minor update to dh_runit manpage
   * update copyright years

Regards,
Lorenzo