Bug#985028: RFS: age/1.0.0~rc1-1 -- simple, modern and secure encryption tool
On Wednesday 17 March 2021 15:32:06 CET Christoph Egger wrote: > Should say `unstable` I guess? > Looks good otherwise Please fix it in the VCS ;-) Christoph
Bug#985028: RFS: age/1.0.0~rc1-1 -- simple, modern and secure encryption tool
Hi! On Thursday 11 March 2021 22:30:01 CET Johan Fleury wrote: > > age (1.0.0~rc1-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium Should say `unstable` I guess? Looks good otherwise Christoph signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#875919: irony-mode
Hi all! FWIW I would be very happy if this could be made alongside moving the package to the emacs-addons-team. If you're interested please set Maintainer to the team and add yourself to uploaders. I can try to make some room for upload on Tuesday but if someone else is faster I'd be more than happy! Christoph pgpK0A9RhpQT4.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Does GNU/kFreeBSD has a Sid distribution?
Hi! Alex Vong alexvong1...@gmail.com writes: GNU/kFreeBSD does have an Sid distribution. Currently, GNU/kFreeBSD provide old stable (Wheezy) There's also jessie-kfreebsd - http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/jessie_di_rc3/kfreebsd-amd64/ Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87twsdn6t7@anonymous.siccegge.de
Re: RFS: Please upload cl-asdf package
Faré f...@tunes.org writes: On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Christoph Egger christ...@christoph-egger.org wrote: Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org writes: There seems to be a somewhat large diff between the upstream release and the debian package source? Is this on purpose? Then the debian package seems to be (almost) the same as the git archive but quite different from the tarball Well, this was kind of on purpose. The upstream tarball was broken from the release branch, so I built it from the minimakefile branch, where the release code was fully rewritten in Lisp and debugged, instead of being a haphazard mix of Makefile, shell scripting and Lisp code with bits of perl. I believe the debian release script was built from the release branch, with a tiny commit to debian/rules as compared to the version tagged 3.1.5 upstream. In all cases, the asdf code itself is unchanged, but some of the build and packaging files have been tweaked. The situation is therefore not perfect, even though everything in under source control. I'd hope for a new debian package maintainer to fix all those kinks; maybe have a separate git branch and/or repo. Allright, thanks for the explanation! I'll upload then Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87fv4f5duf@anonymous.siccegge.de
Re: RFS: Please upload cl-asdf package
Hi! Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org writes: There seems to be a somewhat large diff between the upstream release and the debian package source? Is this on purpose? Then the debian package seems to be (almost) the same as the git archive but quite different from the tarball Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87oaj457k8@anonymous.siccegge.de
Re: RFS: Please upload cl-asdf package
Hi! Faré f...@tunes.org writes: It has many bug fixes, most importantly with debian Bug#787909, an incompatibility of 3.1.4 with the latest SBCL. Please upload the cl-asdf package, after checking that it works fine for you. The cl-asdf source package builds this binary package: cl-asdf- Another System Definition Facility There seems to be a somewhat large diff between the upstream release and the debian package source? Is this on purpose? Christoph % diff -ur asdf-3.1.5 cl-asdf-3.1.5 | diffstat asdf-3.1.5/tools/asdf-tools |only asdf-3.1.5/tools/asdf-tools.asd |only asdf-3.1.5/tools/build.lisp |only asdf-3.1.5/tools/git.lisp |only asdf-3.1.5/tools/installation.lisp |only asdf-3.1.5/tools/main.lisp |only asdf-3.1.5/tools/package.lisp |only asdf-3.1.5/tools/pathnames.lisp |only asdf-3.1.5/tools/release.lisp |only asdf-3.1.5/tools/test-all.lisp |only asdf-3.1.5/tools/test-basic.lisp|only asdf-3.1.5/tools/test-environment.lisp |only asdf-3.1.5/tools/test-scripts.lisp |only asdf-3.1.5/tools/test-upgrade.lisp |only asdf-3.1.5/tools/version.lisp |only cl-asdf-3.1.5/.cl-source-registry.cache |6 cl-asdf-3.1.5/.gitmodules |6 cl-asdf-3.1.5/.pc |only cl-asdf-3.1.5/Makefile | 352 +--- cl-asdf-3.1.5/README.md | 18 - cl-asdf-3.1.5/bin |only cl-asdf-3.1.5/ext |only cl-asdf-3.1.5/test/run-tests.sh |only cl-asdf-3.1.5/test/script-support.lisp |2 cl-asdf-3.1.5/tools/load-asdf.lisp |4 25 files changed, 288 insertions(+), 100 deletions(-) -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87si8g57ph@anonymous.siccegge.de
Bug#785426: RFS: cv/0.6-1 [ITP] -- cv - Coreutils (progress) Viewer)
Hi! lumin cdlumin...@gmail.com writes: To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/cv I'll give it a look shortly More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. probably not that one, right? Additionally I noticed there's already a package shipping /usr/bin/cv: radiance: /usr/bin/cv maybe you can use a different name? Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: package name conflict between RFP and ITP
Hi! lumin cdlumin...@gmail.com writes: A package-name-conflicting RFP [4] was found. Description : Free software alternative for xv image viewer I have no idea about how to handle this name conflict. Any advice or guide? As this is a 3 years old *Request* without any action since then I wouldn't worry about that package much. Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Packaging Telegram Desktop
Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org writes: On the other side it's probably illegal to distribute any binaries from that. GPLv3 (no exceptions) + OpenSSL don't go together very well Oh and requires to patch your Qt installation? Probably not impossible to get this thing to work properly but I guess far from easy Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87d22hwfe4@anonymous.siccegge.de
Re: Packaging Telegram Desktop
Ahoi! Roberto De Oliveira rcdeolive...@gmail.com writes: I want to initiate on the way of Debian Mantainer, so after read few material I think that the first step is to adopt a package and Telegram Desktop[1] is RFP, maybe this package would be simple because it does not give any library or complex dependency... On the other side it's probably illegal to distribute any binaries from that. GPLv3 (no exceptions) + OpenSSL don't go together very well Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87h9rtwfjc@anonymous.siccegge.de
Bug#764383: RFS: ddate/0.2.2-1 [ITP]
Hi! Sebastian Schmidt y...@yath.de writes: Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/ddate/ddate_0.2.2-1.dsc Looks good so far although I think lintian's right with this one (of course without the replaces): I: ddate: conflicts-with-version util-linux ( 2.24.2-1) N: N:An earlier-than version clause is normally an indication that Breaks N:should be used instead of Conflicts. Breaks is a weaker requirement that N:provides the package manager more leeway to find a valid upgrade path. N:Conflicts should only be used if two packages can never be unpacked at N:the same time, or for some situations involving virtual packages (where N:a version clause is not appropriate). In particular, when moving files N:between packages, use Breaks plus Replaces, not Conflicts plus Replaces. N: N:Refer to Debian Policy Manual section 7.4 (Conflicting binary packages - N:Conflicts) for details. N: N:Severity: normal, Certainty: wild-guess N: N:Check: fields, Type: binary, udeb, source Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer pgp6bG0e3iQ_z.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Testing Migration
Godfrey Chung godfrey.ch...@acs.com.hk writes:
I found that my package (http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/acsccid.html)
cannot migrate to testing. The build log (kfreebsd-amd64) is Ok but it
didn't set the status to Installed.
Do you know why?
You'll in general ask the buildd maintainers for that by sending a mail
to ${arch}@buildd.debian.org -- in that case
kfreebsd-am...@buildd.debian.org.
Now I would be the one receiving that mail and I have already reuploaded
the package from the buildd. Let's see
Christoph
--
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87zji8lj3r@anonymous.siccegge.de
Bug#746437: RFS: aumix/2.9.1-3
Vincent Cheng vch...@debian.org writes: On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org wrote: Looking good, uploading! It's been about 11 days since your reply and I don't see aumix/2.9.1-3 anywhere in the archive...so consider this a friendly ping? Oops, thanks for the reminder, I must somehow have failed to actually do the upload. Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87vbtcadct@anonymous.siccegge.de
Re: RFS: cl-launch (updated package)
Faré fah...@gmail.com writes: Dear Debian Mentors and Debian Lispers, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.0.4-1 of my package cl-launch. It builds these binary packages: cl-launch - uniform frontend to running Common Lisp code from the shell The package appears to be lintian clean. W: cl-launch source: ancient-standards-version 3.9.3 (current is 3.9.5) The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-launch - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-launch/cl-launch_4.0.4-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Done, thanks! Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87siokjq4h@mitoraj.siccegge.de
Bug#746437: RFS: aumix/2.9.1-3
Looking good, uploading! Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer pgpUKU8jbPN2M.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: cl-launch (updated package)
Hi! Faré fah...@gmail.com writes: - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-launch/cl-launch_4.0.3-1.dsc On the way Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/8738i763md@anonymous.siccegge.de
Re: RFS: cl-launch (updated package)
Hi! Faré fah...@gmail.com writes: you did well to procrastinate on my cl-launch 4.0.0-1, for after a round of bug fixes, here is 4.0.1-1. Thus, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.0.1-1 of my package cl-launch. It builds these binary packages: cl-launch - uniform frontend to running Common Lisp code from the shell The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-launch - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-launch/cl-launch_4.0.1-1.dsc 4.0.1.1-3 should be on the way in a few minutes Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/8761ny2l84@mitoraj.siccegge.de
Re: RFS: please upload cl-asdf package
Hi Faré Faré f...@tunes.org writes: I'm still doing the debian packaging for ASDF at this point in time for the new upstream maintainer Robert Goldman. This brand new ASDF release received a lot of testing, and fixes a shameful bug in previous recent releases that affects usability under debian (#723977). Can one of the active CL debian hackers please upload the cl-asdf package, after checking that it works fine for you? The cl-asdf source package builds this binary package: cl-asdf- Another System Definition Facility The package appears to be lintian clean. The package cl-asdf can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-asdf - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-asdf/cl-asdf_3.0.3-1.dsc Sorry for the delay, it is building right now! Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer pgpQPBFZatONa.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Fwd: RFS: cl-launch (updated package)
Hi! Faré fah...@gmail.com writes: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.22.1-1 of my package cl-launch. It builds these binary packages: cl-launch - uniform frontend to running Common Lisp code from the shell The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-launch - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-launch/cl-launch_3.022.1-1.dsc Building Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ob6hggc0@mitoraj.siccegge.de
Re: RFS: please upload cl-asdf package
Hi! Faré f...@tunes.org writes: On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote: - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-asdf/cl-asdf_3.0.2-1.dsc Upstream tarbal is 6f78cb311f9b8756ebed5924a6bd7302e283ccbf The dsc mentions 7987d33bafe5a1f0fa91a7380a3594206a5a0cdb Is this intentional? Regards Christoph pgpg5f7Nvr_ZT.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#691361: RFS: common-lisp-controller/7.10
Desmond O. Chang doch...@gmail.com writes: * Package name: common-lisp-controller Version : 7.10 * License : Lisp Lesser GNU Public License (LLGPL) Section : lisp It builds those binary packages: common-lisp-controller - Common Lisp source and compiler manager To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/common-lisp-controller Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/common-lisp-controller/common-lisp-controller_7.10.dsc Changes since the last upload: common-lisp-controller (7.10) unstable; urgency=low [ victory@gmail.com ] * debian/po/ja.po + Add Japanese translation (Closes: #690786). -- Desmond O. Chang doch...@gmail.com Thu, 25 Oct 2012 01:34:43 +0800 Regards, Desmond O. Chang -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87hapjvbzs@mitoraj.siccegge.de
Bug#691361: RFS: common-lisp-controller/7.10
Hi! Desmond O. Chang doch...@gmail.com writes: * Package name: common-lisp-controller Version : 7.10 * License : Lisp Lesser GNU Public License (LLGPL) Section : lisp Uploaded! Regards Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87d307vbyk@mitoraj.siccegge.de
Bug#691363: RFS: stumpwm/1:20111204.gitb1271a9-1
Hi! Desmond O. Chang doch...@gmail.com writes: * Package name: stumpwm Version : 1:20111204.gitb1271a9-1 Upstream Author : Shawn Betts sabe...@gmail.com * URL : http://www.nongnu.org/stumpwm/ * License : GPL-2+ and others Section : x11 stumpwm (1:20111204.gitb1271a9-1) unstable; urgency=low * New Git checkout (b1271a91efe529f774d6c2d4189b9e3e95d61aea) * debian/patches/08_fix-bashisms.diff (Closes: #690620). + Fix the bashisms reported by /usr/bin/checkbashisms . This seems to be a fix we want for the wheezy release right? I see no chance for the other modifications to be acceptable for wheezy at the current stage of the release process so maybe prepare a release with only this change (and push the other changes later or to experimental)? * debian/rules + Rewrite version number replacing code. + No need to remove bundled asdf.lisp . * debian/control + Upgrade Standards-Version to 3.9.3 -- Desmond O. Chang doch...@gmail.com Tue, 23 Oct 2012 01:12:50 +0800 Regards Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/878vavvbv8@mitoraj.siccegge.de
Re: Preliminary Debian packaging for Clozure Common Lisp (ccl.clozure.com)
Hi again Faheem Mitha fah...@faheem.info writes: 2) The main outstanding issue is how to handle the bootstrapping issue, namely that CCL is not in Debian, but requires CCL to compile. For sbcl I do bootstrapping with a crossbuild from another architecture .. building just a non-packaged version and using that to bring up the package. Once there is a version in the archive everything works automatically. So ideally I can build the first package with a locally installed ccl (e.g. in /usr/local/bin, ..). sbcl's debian/rules has some magic now to do this (and the last commit is totally messed up :-( Could one just use upstream binaries instead? CCL has upstream binaries available, which I use to initially build my Debian package, for at least i386 and amd64. My package currently does not attempt to build on any other architecture, because I can't test it. Jep that'll work you just need to provide the sponsor with enough information to bootstrap the package with binaries from a sane enough source (and I'd consider upstream such a source). Best to add this information to debian/README.source IMHO. I guess bootstrapping only needs to be done once and later versions of ccl can be built using the version that is then included in Debian? Well this is precisely my question to the CCL developers. So far, I have not got a response. See the thread http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.openmcl.devel/8046 If it's not possible to build ccl with a (slightly) older version of ccl it'll be pain to maintain. One can (as Peter noted in the thread) go the cmucl route but that'll need the maintainer (you) to do bootstrapping every time, the sponsor to do bootstrapping every time and for evvery architeccture you might want to support (as you might have noticed cmucl is only available on linux-i386 and not even on 64bit systems) Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87harzatv7@hepworth.siccegge.de
Re: Preliminary Debian packaging for Clozure Common Lisp (ccl.clozure.com)
Hi! Please Send any mail also directly to me if you're interested in my Input as I'm not reading -mentors regularly and pkg-common-lisp-devel@ is -- it appears -- not getting enough of my attention to see your messages in time. Faheem Mitha fah...@faheem.info writes: 1) I'd like to take over the outstanding ITP for CCL (#609047, cc'd). I've written to Darren Ho, the creator of this ITP, on 1st July 2012, (see http://bugs.debian.org/609047), but have not yet received a reply. What else do I need to do, if anything? Send a mail to the bug report explaining that you'll take over and set yourself as the owner of the bug. I guess I need to get a sponsor at some point. When should this happen? It needs to be done once you have a package ready on mentors.debian.net 2) The main outstanding issue is how to handle the bootstrapping issue, namely that CCL is not in Debian, but requires CCL to compile. For sbcl I do bootstrapping with a crossbuild from another architecture .. building just a non-packaged version and using that to bring up the package. Once there is a version in the archive everything works automatically. So ideally I can build the first package with a locally installed ccl (e.g. in /usr/local/bin, ..). sbcl's debian/rules has some magic now to do this (and the last commit is totally messed up :-( I guess bootstrapping only needs to be done once and later versions of ccl can be built using the version that is then included in Debian? 3) My current package description for the package is 4) Debian requires a copyright statement, which is located in the copyright file in the repository. On installation it is installed in /usr/share/doc/pkgname/copyright. Here is the current text, taken from the openmcl package that was in Debian a few years ago. ### OpenMCL is licensed under ... CCL? Regards Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ehn9bvld@mitoraj.siccegge.de
Re: Minutes from Getting your packages into Debian
Hi! David Bremner brem...@debian.org writes: QUOTE: Bremner: Gobby is not emacs, it's so sad. you know rudel-mode? ;-) Regards Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87a9xxbvep@mitoraj.siccegge.de
Re: RFS: cl-asdf (updated package)
Faré fah...@gmail.com writes: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2:2.22-1 of my package cl-asdf. It builds this binary package: cl-asdf - Another System Definition Facility The package cl-asdf can also be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-asdf - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-asdf/cl-asdf_2.22-1.dsc Uploaded Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87d34xk3du@hepworth.siccegge.de
Re: RFS: cl-launch (updated package)
Faré fah...@gmail.com writes: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.018-1 of my package cl-launch. It builds these binary packages: cl-launch - uniform frontend to running Common Lisp code from the shell The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-launch - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-launch/cl-launch_3.018-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Uploaded Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87aa0qrk4v@hepworth.siccegge.de
Re: RFS: cl-asdf (updated package)
Hi! Faré fah...@gmail.com writes: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2:2.21-1 of my package cl-asdf. It builds this binary package: cl-asdf - Another System Definition Facility The package appears to be lintian clean, except for W: cl-asdf: debian-changelog-line-too-long line 31 There's a 82-character line indeed. Oops. Should I repackage? Just take care of this and the out-of-date std-version for your next upload. -21 should be in in a few seconds. Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/871umxodi3@hepworth.siccegge.de
Bug#669722: RFS: gnunet/0.9.2-1 [ITA]
Hi! Bertrand Marc beberk...@gmail.com writes: I am looking for a sponsor for my package gnunet * Package name: gnunet Version : 0.9.2-1 Upstream Author : Christian Grothoff christ...@grothoff.org * URL : https://gnunet.org * License : GPL3 Section : net It builds those binary packages: gnunet - secure, trust-based peer-to-peer framework (meta) gnunet-client - secure, trust-based peer-to-peer framework (client) gnunet-common - secure, trust-based peer-to-peer framework (common) gnunet-dbg - secure, trust-based peer-to-peer framework (debug) gnunet-dev - secure, trust-based peer-to-peer framework (development) gnunet-server - secure, trust-based peer-to-peer framework (server) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/gnunet Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnunet/gnunet_0.9.2-1.dsc == uscan warning: In debian/watch no matching files for watch line ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gnunet/gnunet-(\d.+).tar.gz == The dependency on libmicrohttpd-dev can only be fullfilled in experimental while you're trying to upload to unstable? == FTBFS: configure: error: GNUnet requires libextractor == dpkg-source: info: local changes detected, the modified files are: /home/christoph/code/debian/sponsoring/gnunet-0.9.2/config.log dpkg-source: info: you can integrate the local changes with dpkg-source --commit == Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87vckraprb@hepworth.siccegge.de
Re: RFS dhcp-probe
Hi! lguignard.deb...@gmail.com lguignard.deb...@gmail.com writes: I am looking for a sponsor for my package dhcp-probe. * Package name: dhcp-probe Version : 1.3.0-10 Upstream Author : Irwin Tillman network...@princeton.edu * URL : http://www.net.princeton.edu/software/dhcp_probe/ * License : GPL Section : net It builds those binary packages: dhcp-probe - network DHCP or BootP server discover Just uploaded! I've noticed two things on the way (in no way critical): c25796bbf70ecffd285ce40ec8bb9956e4654ad1 ../tmp/dhcp-probe_1.3.0.orig.tar.gz dd48d6605e02583d8cd5f2aeff67c1320c2bc2cf ../dhcp-probe_1.3.0.orig.tar.gz Your tarball diverges from the one distributed by the upstream website but there's no get-orig-source target in debian/rules. What happened? P: dhcp-probe source: unneeded-build-dep-on-quilt You might want tofix that one day ;-) Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ehunpvjq@hepworth.siccegge.de
Re: RFS: glew (new upstream version / orphaned package)
Hi! Matteo F. Vescovi m.vesc...@revese.it writes: We are looking for a sponsor for our package glew. Thank you for taking care of glew! Unfortunately I won't be able to look at your package right now but if there are no sponsors untill early next week when I have more time I'll look at it! Feel free to ping me directly if I forget about it! Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer pgpIrHWzMeNIR.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: cl-asdf (updated package)
Hi! Faré fah...@gmail.com writes: - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-asdf/cl-asdf_2.019-1.dsc Uploaded! Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ipm0asp6@hepworth.siccegge.de
Re: RFS: cl-launch, cl-asdf (updated packages)
Hi! Faré fah...@gmail.com writes: They build these respective binary packages: cl-launch - uniform frontend to running Common Lisp code from the shell cl-asdf- Another System Definition Facility Uploaded! Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87sjm87rws@hepworth.siccegge.de
Re: RFS: clfswm
Hi! Desmond O. Chang doch...@gmail.com writes: clfswm - A(nother) Common Lisp FullScreen Window Manager stumpwm- tiling, keyboard driven Common Lisp window manager Both uploaded! Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87wrbk7s7c@hepworth.siccegge.de
Re: RFS: cl-launch, cl-asdf (updated packages)
Hi! Faré fah...@gmail.com writes: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.013-1 of my package cl-launch. I've uploaded cl-launch now! Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87pqiixpdp@hepworth.siccegge.de
Re: Packaging php app/scripts
Hi! kuLa deb...@kulisz.net writes: Content of d/control: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7) Content of d/rules: override_dh_install: dh_install --sourcedir=src for override targets you need debhelper = 7.0.50~ debhelper 7 isn't enough dh_install: cp -a debian/tmp/src/index.php debian/glocon/var/www/ Installing into /var/www is a no-go for packages. I'll need to install into /usr/share/$packagename and make sure your webapp can work without the whole lot of scripts located in the documentroot. Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer pgpiImyHFpmiq.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: getstream
Hi! Hervé Rousseau he...@moulticast.net writes: On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 14:17, Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org wrote: The orig.tar.gz downloaded from the website differs from the orig.tar.gz in your package: 1144dc0180cedb494f6c7826e994fc3bcf7eebe4 getstream_20100616.orig.tar.gz.website 1e45acb2b75b6da9ecd446408f04dd2631c5f71f getstream_20100616.orig.tar.gz.mentors Is there any reason for that? Hi ! I guess I unpacked the archive and did some changes I forgot to reverse and start again from the original .tgz... I have re-uploaded the package on mentors.debian.net with the proper original archive from upstream's website. I'm mostly fine with uploading. However I'm wondering about the licensing. I couldn't find any information about a license apart from a single file that claims to be taken from the kernel and being GPLv2 (not GPLv2 or later like in debian/copyright though that doesn't matter probably as it was Public Domain before). Is there any claim hidden somwhere that the rest of getstream is GPLv2? Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/878vq3w79g@hepworth.siccegge.de
Re: RFS: getstream
Hi! Hervé Rousseau he...@moulticast.net writes: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/getstream/getstream_20100616-1.dsc The orig.tar.gz downloaded from the website differs from the orig.tar.gz in your package: 1144dc0180cedb494f6c7826e994fc3bcf7eebe4 getstream_20100616.orig.tar.gz.website 1e45acb2b75b6da9ecd446408f04dd2631c5f71f getstream_20100616.orig.tar.gz.mentors Is there any reason for that? Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87d3fhx1kn@hepworth.siccegge.de
Re: RFS: gawk
Hi! Jeroen Schot sc...@a-eskwadraat.nl writes: I am looking for a sponsor for my package gawk. Looks quite fine. Just the patches could use some more documentation. Especially the 19_gawk.1-hyphen.diff is just the dpkg-source boilerplate ;) uploaded anyway. Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87pqjtpdgu@hepworth.siccegge.de
Re: Depends on -dev package
Hi! Paul Elliott pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com writes: I quote from Debian Library Packaging guide 2. -DEV package dependencies The -DEV package would usually declare Depends: relationship on all -DEV packages for libraries that the library package directly depends upon, with the specific SONAME version that the library package is linked against. This includes libc-dev. [5] Does this mean that if my library has an include reference #include stdio.h in one of its .c or .h files, then my -dev package must have a depends line like this in its debian/control file: You need that for packages ∉ build-essential that any of your public headers includes. No reason to do that for some .c files. I've basically never ever seen a -dev package depending on libc-dev. Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/871uwd3h6b@hepworth.siccegge.de
Re: RFS: bmake -- NetBSD make
Hi! Please Cc me on answers as I only read -mentors aoccasionally, thanks! Andrew O. Shadoura bugzi...@tut.by writes: Hello, I am looking for a sponsor for my package 'bmake'. * Package name: bmake Version : 20110622-1 Upstream Author : Simon J. Gerraty s...@void.crufty.net * URL : http://www.crufty.net/help/sjg/bmake.htm * License : BSD Section : devel It builds this binary package: bmake - NetBSD make The upload would fix these bugs: #476267, #627983. The original packaging was done by NetBSD developer Aleksey Cheusov. Together with Jeroen Schot we're working on this package maintainance. This package is important as pmake that's currently in Debian is too old and obsolete, and bmake's absense is preventing some software from entering Debian. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/bmake - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bmake/bmake_20110622-1.dsc Also, it's kept under version control here: http://anonscm.debian.org/hg/collab-maint/bmake You do explicitely list the BSD-4 and BSD-3 license found in bmake. However the BSD-2 pieces (like trace.h): /*- * Copyright (c) 2000 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc. * All rights reserved. * * This code is derived from software contributed to The NetBSD Foundation * by Bill Sommerfeld * * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions * are met: * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright *notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright *notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the *documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. * * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE NETBSD FOUNDATION, INC. AND CONTRIBUTORS * ``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED * TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR * PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE FOUNDATION OR CONTRIBUTORS * BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR * CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF * SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS * INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN * CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) * ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE * POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. */ and ISC licensed parts (like strlcpy.c): /* * Copyright (c) 1998 Todd C. Miller todd.mil...@courtesan.com * * Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any * purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above * copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies. * * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED AS IS AND TODD C. MILLER DISCLAIMS ALL * WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES * OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL TODD C. MILLER BE LIABLE * FOR ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES * WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN ACTION * OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF OR IN * CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. */ are missing. Probably fixable by just putting these 2 blobs into copyright ore something like that -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87wregmcl3@hepworth.siccegge.de
Re: ITA-RFS: pacpl (updated package)
Hi! Maxime Chatelle m...@gmx.com writes: You can dget it at (same url): http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pacpl/pacpl_4.0.5-6.dsc Looks fine, however that one might be worth fixing before an upload: W: pacpl: spelling-error-in-readme-debian informations information Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87r56jwawk@hepworth.siccegge.de
Re: ITA-RFS: pacpl (updated package)
Hi! Maxime Chatelle m...@gmx.com writes: Dear mentors, Christoph, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.0.5-5 of my package pacpl. I adopted it recently. (http://bugs.debian.org/608808) It builds these binary packages: pacpl - multi-purpose audio converter/ripper/tagger script The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 561459, 589790, 608601, 608808 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pacpl - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pacpl/pacpl_4.0.5-5.dsc Unfortunately the packages does not build here (full build log attached). You can use tools like sbuild or pbuilder to make sure your package builds fine with just your build-depends around. Regards Christoph sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.62.2 (05 Apr 2011) on hepworth.siccegge.de ╔══╗ ║ pacpl 4.0.5-5 (amd64) 23 Jun 2011 14:33 ║ ╚══╝ Package: pacpl Version: 4.0.5-5 Source Version: 4.0.5-5 Distribution: unstable Architecture: amd64 I: NOTICE: Log filtering will replace 'build/pacpl-iD3aTt' with '«BUILDDIR»' I: NOTICE: Log filtering will replace 'var/lib/schroot/mount/unstable-amd64-sbuild-812f2e71-5fbd-4cd6-97f9-4ead741ce17c' with '«CHROOT»' ┌──┐ │ Update chroot│ └──┘ Get:1 ftp://sol.asgard unstable InRelease Ign ftp://sol.asgard unstable InRelease Hit ftp://sol.asgard unstable Release.gpg Hit ftp://sol.asgard unstable Release Get:2 ftp://sol.asgard unstable/main amd64 Packages/DiffIndex Ign ftp://sol.asgard unstable/main amd64 Packages/DiffIndex Get:3 ftp://sol.asgard unstable/main TranslationIndex Ign ftp://sol.asgard unstable/main TranslationIndex Hit ftp://sol.asgard unstable/main amd64 Packages Get:4 ftp://sol.asgard unstable/main Translation-en Get:5 ftp://sol.asgard unstable/main Translation-en Get:6 ftp://sol.asgard unstable/main Translation-en Get:7 ftp://sol.asgard unstable/main Translation-en Ign ftp://sol.asgard unstable/main Translation-en Hit ftp://debian.cs.fau.de unstable InRelease Hit ftp://debian.cs.fau.de unstable/main Sources/DiffIndex Hit ftp://debian.cs.fau.de unstable/main amd64 Packages/DiffIndex Hit ftp://debian.cs.fau.de unstable/main TranslationIndex Reading package lists... Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information... 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. ┌──┐ │ Fetch source files │ └──┘ Local sources ─ pacpl_4.0.5-5.dsc exists in .; copying to chroot Check arch ── Merged Build-Depends: build-essential, fakeroot Filtered Build-Depends: build-essential, fakeroot dpkg-deb: building package `sbuild-build-depends-core-dummy' in `/«BUILDDIR»/resolver-SNiwGN/apt_archive/sbuild-build-depends-core-dummy.deb'. OK Reading package lists... ┌──┐ │ Install core build dependencies (apt-based resolver) │ └──┘ Installing build dependencies Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information... The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: libpopt0 whiptail libpcre3 libfribidi0 adduser libnewt0.52 Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. The following NEW packages will be installed: sbuild-build-depends-core-dummy debconf: delaying package configuration, since apt-utils is not installed 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0 B/706 B of archives. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. Selecting previously deselected package sbuild-build-depends-core-dummy. (Reading database ... 10969 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking sbuild-build-depends-core-dummy (from .../sbuild-build-depends-core-dummy.deb) ... Setting up sbuild-build-depends-core-dummy (0.invalid.0) ... Merged Build-Depends: base-files, base-passwd, bash, coreutils, dash, debianutils, diffutils, dpkg, e2fsprogs, findutils, grep, gzip, hostname, ncurses-base, ncurses-bin, perl-base, sed, login, sysvinit-utils, sysvinit, tar, bsdutils, mount, util-linux, libc6-dev | libc-dev, gcc (= 4:4.4.3), g++ (= 4:4.4.3), make, dpkg-dev (=
Re: ITA-RFS: pacpl (updated package)
Hi! Maxime Chatelle m...@gmx.com writes: On 06/23/2011 14:36:38, Christoph Egger wrote: Unfortunately the packages does not build here (full build log attached). You can use tools like sbuild or pbuilder to make sure your package builds fine with just your build-depends around. Yes, I made a little lack of understanding about what can be needed to build a perl package, build-deps fixed, understanding too. And Pbuilder is now my friend ;) Here, you can find a new revision of pacpl : http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pacpl http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pacpl/pacpl_4.0.5-6.dsc with a new bug fixed (was reported lately) : http://bugs.debian.org/629464 Did you remove the newly introduces README.Debian on purpose or did it get lost somewhere by accident? Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? pgpKFPqYaTRcb.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: ITA - RFS: cronolog (updated package)
Hi! Maxime Chatelle m...@gmx.com writes: It builds these binary packages: cronolog - Logfile rotator for web servers - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cronolog/cronolog_1.6.2+rpk-1.dsc Uploaded. Feel free to Cc me on future RFS for this or other packages (I read -mentors only from time to time) though I'm not always responding fast. Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? pgp6YFNIIIRM5.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: dsniff (updated package)
Hi! William Vera bi...@billy.com.mx writes: - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dsniff/dsniff_2.4b1+debian-20.dsc Uploaded. Just please get the dual-patch-system stuff out some time soon ;) Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87wrgolahu@hepworth.siccegge.de
Re: RFS: dsniff (updated package)
Hi! William Vera bi...@billy.com.mx writes: Thanks for he quickly response! Indeed I tried to migrate with this instructions: http://blog.orebokech.com/2007/08/converting-debian-packages-from-dpatch.html (Previously with another package I managed the migration without problem with this method) But in this case it crash, throws me errors and no patch can be applied Any clue? :) Key is to refresh the patches after converting as dpkg refuses all fuzzy patches. Otherwise converting seems to go well: http://people.debian.org/~christoph/dsniff_2.4b1+debian-20.1.dsc Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? pgpW8iTx2UT2o.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: ITA-RFS: cronolog - logfile rotator
Hi! Maxime Chatelle m...@gmx.com writes: It appear to be lintian clean. and can be found here: http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=cronolog http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cronolog/cronolog_1.6.2-6.dsc It seems the .orig.tar.gz of your upload to mentors.debian.net differs From the one in the archive. Did you modify the tarball? where did you get it from? Please use the tarball currently in the archive (and if you package new upstream versions the one published on upstream's website *unmodified* if possible). This incluldes unpacking and re-tarring the source tree. Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? pgpNmWpoEBXub.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: ITA-RFS: cronolog - logfile rotator
Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org writes: Maxime Chatelle m...@gmx.com writes: It appear to be lintian clean. and can be found here: http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=cronolog http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cronolog/cronolog_1.6.2-6.dsc It seems the .orig.tar.gz of your upload to mentors.debian.net differs From the one in the archive. Did you modify the tarball? where did you get it from? Please use the tarball currently in the archive (and if you package new upstream versions the one published on upstream's website *unmodified* if possible). This incluldes unpacking and re-tarring the source tree. Ah I see where that comes from. Those packages with tarball-in-tarball are rather rare these days. Changing the tarball without renaming it won't technically work however. You can still rename the tarball to something like cronolog_1.6.2+ds.orig.tar.gz and adapt the version in debian/changelog accordingly so you can move to the more standard layout. Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/871uyxtt61@hepworth.siccegge.de
Re: RFS: cl-launch, cl-asdf (updated packages)
Hi! Faré fah...@gmail.com writes: - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-launch/cl-launch_3.011-1.dsc - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-asdf/cl-asdf_2.016-1.dsc Both uploaded! Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? pgpngfcWHvJtY.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: cl-asdf (updated package)
Faré fah...@gmail.com writes: - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cl-asdf/cl-asdf_2.013.3-1.dsc Uploaded, thanks! Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? pgp6zFuRij3QK.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Help needed: Bug#618057: dialign: FTBFS: dialign.c:345: undefined reference to `para_read'
Hi! Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu writes: I had a look into the file in question which has something like: $ grep para_read dialign.c extern void para_read( int num , char **arg ); para_read( argnum , arguments ); Any idea why this leads to undefined reference to `para_read' You're just saying that the para_read function comes from extern and then use it. But you don't like to the provider of that function. Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? pgpCBQkcRl2z9.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: piwik
Fabrizio Regalli fab...@fabreg.it writes: I am looking for a sponsor for my package piwik. * Package name: piwik Version : 1.2-1 Upstream Author : Fabrizio Regalli fab...@fabreg.it * URL : http://www.piwik.org * License : GPL v3 Section : web It builds these binary packages: piwik - Open source web analytics The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 609521 My motivation for maintaining this package is: this software helps who want use a web statistic program without use Google analytics or some other software like that. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/piwik - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/piwik/piwik_1.2-1.dsc There are some compiled files like libs/open-flash-chart/open-flash-chart.swf that come without source and are not build from source during package build. Please fix that (or put the package on non-free) Regards Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87mxl9goqt@chillida.siccegge.de
Re: RFS: abcl, new upstream release 0.24.0
Hi! Darren Hoo darren@gmail.com writes: A new version of abcl 0.24.0 has been released upstream. This is the updated package, the URL of my package is at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/abcl The respective dsc file can be found at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/abcl/abcl_0.24.0-1.dsc I wish someone could upload it for me. Looks quite good to me for all that I can tell. However I don't have much of a clue of the java part, maybe some debian-java folk can give it a look? Regards Christoph pgpISTzpYE9eN.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: abcl
Darren Hoo darren@gmail.com writes: dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/abcl/abcl_0.23.1-2.dsc lintian -IE --pedantic ~~ P: abcl source: debian-control-has-unusual-field-spacing line 11 P: abcl source: debian-control-has-unusual-field-spacing line 27 Extra spaces at the begining of the Depends Fields. Honestly, I don't care about these I: abcl: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 8187kB 99% I: abcl-source: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 4376kB 100% Any reason these packages are architecture specific? Both of them look like the same binary would work on any architecture. I: abcl: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man1/abcl.1.gz:31 I: abcl: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man1/abcl.1.gz:32 I: abcl: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man1/abcl.1.gz:50 Should be easy to fix, right? btw have you sent your manpage upstream? I: abcl: package-contains-empty-directory usr/share/doc/abcl/examples/google-app-engine/src/META-INF/ I: abcl: package-contains-empty-directory usr/share/doc/abcl/examples/google-app-engine/war/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/ I: abcl: package-contains-empty-directory usr/share/doc/abcl/examples/google-app-engine/war/WEB-INF/classes/abcl_ae/ I: abcl: package-contains-empty-directory usr/share/doc/abcl/examples/google-app-engine/war/WEB-INF/lib/ I: abcl: package-contains-empty-directory usr/share/doc/abcl/examples/google-app-engine/war/fasls/ These look like it might actually right to keep it the way it already is. W: abcl-source: extra-license-file usr/share/abcl-source/LICENSE Just delete that after dh_install -- the content is already in debian/copyright Other notes ~~~ Looks quite well actually. Just the hint to abcl-source in abcl's description looks a bit misplaced. I am wondering whether it is neccessary to integrate it with common-lisp-controller since abcl is running on JVM, it does not have the schemes like other CL implementations that support dumping core/image. Maybe someone else can help here? Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? pgpjb8KBO4DhI.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: abcl
Hi! Darren Hoo darren@gmail.com writes: I am looking for a sponsor for my package abcl. * Package name: abcl Version : 0.23.1 Upstream Author : ABCL development team and contributors * URL : http://common-lisp.net/project/armedbear/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: Java,Lisp Section : lisp Description : A full implementation of the Common Lisp language running in JVM It builds these binary packages: abcl - A full implementation of the Common Lisp on JVM abcl-source - Source code files for ABCL The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 608466 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/abcl - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/abcl/abcl_0.23.1-1.dsc The packages doesn't seem to be present anymore. Can you provide a working link? If you want to you'd also be welcome over there at the Debian Common Lisp Team [0] using our VCS and sharing experience related to common lisp packaging if you want to. Regards Christoph [0] pkg-common-lisp-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org pgphPZpl5QH40.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: cl-asdf 2.012
Hi! Faré fah...@gmail.com writes: I'd like someone to give a look at cl-asdf 2.012, and upload it to unstable. It's an upstream update. The debian packaging is trivial. Is the patch you made to the toplevel Makefile inside the Debian package only intentional? generally looks fine for me so I'd upload it. Regards Christoph pgpwresVJPTZh.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: webfs (updated package)
Hi! Mats Erik Andersson mats.anders...@gisladisker.se writes: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.21+ds1-7 of my package webfs. It builds these binary packages: webfs - lightweight http server for static content The package appears to be pedantically lintian clean. The upload would fix a single bug: 601044, and thus make packaging in Debian and Ubuntu equivalent. This is an FTBFS when using binutils-gold. The problem was reported from the Ubuntu team. Your last upload ( -6) was a translation update and hasn't migrated to testing yet. I'd suggest asking the release team for a freeze exception (it's translation only so shouldn't be a problem). After -6 migrating I'd upload this fix for you (optionally to experimental). Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? pgpApdnT6CqTf.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: webfs (updated package)
Mats Erik Andersson mats.anders...@gisladisker.se writes: It builds this binary package: webfs - lightweight http server for static content The package is pedantically lintian clean. The package closes #599945, updating a Debconf translation. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/webfs - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/webfs/webfs_1.21+ds1-6.dsc Looks fine, building right now! I'll upload once it's built Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? pgpZf9yExzSKn.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: cppcheck, new upstream version 1.45
Reijo Tomperi aggr...@users.sourceforge.net writes: New upstream version was released, so I made a new Debian package of it. I'm again looking for a sponsor for it. Hi! Your package looks fine to me (as far as I have checked). Are you aware of the freeze for Debian's squeeze release? Do you want this to indeed go to unstable right now? Putting into experimental would be another option. Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? pgpZILdU3lrE3.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: xfe (updated package with some fixes) (2nd try)
Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de writes: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.32.1-5 of my package xfe. It builds these binary packages: xfe- A lightweight file manager for X11 xfe-i18n - A lightweight file manager for X11 (i18n support) xfe-themes - A lightweight file manager for X11 (themes) The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 570205, 591217, 593215 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfe - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfe/xfe_1.32.1-5.dsc Uploading -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? pgprZombCJHUE.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Advice on an interesting package
Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de writes: I'm afraid not, other than have libopensync1 change the library name so it has libopensync1.so or something. Please no! Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87y6b13k10@chillida.ipv6.sieglitzhof.net
Re: Advice on an interesting package
Hi! Martin Owens docto...@gmail.com writes: Add to that the upstream has a tendency to merge in the debian changes into the trunk and I think he would like to merge in this directory too. I understand that upstream should avoid adding debian to their main code repository, is that right? Well upstreams are encouraged to not include the debian/ stuff in their release tarballs. It might be better to have debian/ in a separat branch but having it in upstream VCS isn't a problem right away. Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? pgp8eXQ3AGT67.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: netstat-nat (QA upload)
Johann Felix Soden joh...@gmx.de writes: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4.10-2 of the package netstat-nat. It builds these binary packages: netstat-nat - tool that display NAT connections The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 593769 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/netstat-nat - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/netstat-nat/netstat-nat_1.4.10-2.dsc Uploaded Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? pgp2jJlhOaBmQ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: delta3d
Hi! James Goppert james.gopp...@gmail.com writes: I am looking for a sponsor for my package delta3d. * Package name: delta3d Version : 2.4.0-1 Upstream Author : Erik Johnson i...@delta3d.org * URL : http://www.delta3d.org * License : LGPL, GPL Hm if I remember correctly delta3d uses open-dis? If delta3d is GPL you're going to have trouble as open-dis license and GPL are incompatible. Section : libs It builds these binary packages: delta3d- Simulation/Game engine delta3d-apps - Simulation/Game engine delta3d-dev - Simulation/Game engine The upload would fix these bugs: 457691 My motivation for maintaining this package is: It provides a simulation engine that is geared towards research and development for linux. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/delta3d - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/delta3d/delta3d_2.4.0-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. If you are interested in sponsoring this packaged please CC: james.gopp...@gmail.com [CC done] Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? pgpzgO5aQM5h1.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: common-lisp-controller (updated package)
Hi! Desmond O. Chang doch...@gmail.com writes: On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 00:57, Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org wrote: I guess this is targeted at squeeze? Have you contacted the release team already? If not please mail them and explain why you should get a freeze exception (looks like that should not be a problem to me). If you have the confirmation from -release I'll upload. Not specific to squeeze. You may upload it into sid first, although I will contact the release team to request a freeze exception. Well Idea is to have nothing in sid that is not intended for the release in preparation (squeeze at the moment) so the way upload to sid - package is tested there - package goes to testing is always open if fixes are needed later, For stuff that is not going to be in squeeze might be better to upload to experimental. BTW, are you on the -rele...@l.d.o? Do I need to CC to you? I do read that through gmane from time to time but generally would be better to Cc me as it's quite likely I'll miss it otherwise. Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? pgpW4VmdhqgZC.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: open-dis
James Goppert james.gopp...@gmail.com writes:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package open-dis.
* Package name: open-dis
Version : 2.5-1
Upstream Author : Don McGregor mcgr...@users.sourceforge.net
* URL : http://open-dis.sourceforge.net
* License : BSD like, with conditions
Section : libs
It builds these binary packages:
libdis - Distributed Interactive Simulation Protocol
libdis-dev - Distributed Interactive Simulation Protocol
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 593009
/---
| find cpp/DIS/ -name *.h -exec cp -v {} $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/include/DIS/
\;
| find CppUtils/DIS/ -name *.h -exec cp -v {}
$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/include/DIS/ \;
\---
Any reason you're using find? One could fear you're loosing
directory structure (but there are no directories). A cp -v cpp/DIS/*.h ...
should work as well right?
/---
| % uscan --report-status
| Processing watchfile line for package open-dis...
| Newest version on remote site is enumerations-bin_1.1, local version is 2.5
| open-dis: Newer version (enumerations-bin_1.1) available on remote site:
|
http://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php/open-dis/open-dis-enumerations-bin_1.1.tar.gz
| (local version is 2.5)
\---
I'd propose the following change:
/---
--- debian/watch.orig 2010-08-24 01:16:27.602516565 +0200
+++ debian/watch2010-08-24 01:16:44.714513820 +0200
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
version=3
-http://sf.net/open-dis/open-dis-(.*)\.tar\.gz
+http://sf.net/open-dis/open-dis-([\d.]*)\.tar\.g
\---
Which changes that to
/---
| % uscan --report-status
| Processing watchfile line for package open-dis...
| Newest version on remote site is 3.0, local version is 2.5
| open-dis: Newer version (3.0) available on remote site:
| http://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php/open-dis/open-dis-3.0.tar.gz
| (local version is 2.5)
\---
Any reason to not use the up-to-date version?
Regards
Christoph
--
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
pgpxhXR40UaZa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: common-lisp-controller (updated package)
Hi! Desmond O. Chang doch...@gmail.com writes: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 7.4 of my package common-lisp-controller. It builds these binary packages: common-lisp-controller - Common Lisp source and compiler manager The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 593157 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/common-lisp-controller - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/common-lisp-controller/common-lisp-controller_7.4.dsc I guess this is targeted at squeeze? Have you contacted the release team already? If not please mail them and explain why you should get a freeze exception (looks like that should not be a problem to me). If you have the confirmation from -release I'll upload. Regards Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8762z3j43h@chillida.ipv6.sieglitzhof.net
Re: RFS: libcdk5 (QA upload)
Hi! Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com writes: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 5.0.20060507-3 of my package libcdk5. This fixes two bugs (a crasher and missing files) and lintian cleaning/policy updating. It builds these binary packages: libcdk5- C-based curses widget library libcdk5-dev - C-based curses widget library (development files) The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 452401, 500161 As Debian is in freeze at the moment, did you check with the release team if that upload is ok? The crash might in fact warrant a severity normal at least Regards Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/877hjubxc1@chillida.ipv6.sieglitzhof.net
Re: RFS: twofish -- updated package
Mats Erik Andersson mats.anders...@gisladisker.se writes: I am looking for a sponsor for a new version 0.3-2 of the package twofish. It builds these binary packages: libtwofish-dev - Niels Ferguson's Twofish cryptographic algorithm library libtwofish0 - Niels Ferguson's Twofish cryptographic library -- runtime package The package appears to be lintian clean in i386, amd64, and kfreebsd-i386. The upload would fix this bug: 522262, an ITA bug. Hi! With Policy 3.9.1 the -D_REENTRANT requirement has been dropped. YOu might want to get rid of that for the next upload. That's of course newer than the package -- uploaded as it is now. Regards Christoph P.S.: Have you considered becoming DM? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/876302tawo@chillida.ipv6.sieglitzhof.net
Re: RFA: scribes -- simple, slim and sleek, yet powerful text editor for GNOME
Chris rac...@makeworld.com writes: Greetings, The respective dsc file can be found at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scribes/scribes_0.4~r543-2.dsc You removed the reverence to GFDL for documentation files from Copyright. Is that correct? Please document! debian-changes-0.4~r543-2 -- That patch does a very specific thing. Please fill out the template in the patch header and rename it appropriately You've dropped the Python Application Packaging Team. That's not a problem but you might also consider to work on that package as part of the team. Regards Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87aapyi8by@chillida.ipv6.sieglitzhof.net
Re: RFS: ziproxy (updated package)
Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org writes: Marcos Talau ta...@users.sourceforge.net writes: The upload would fix these bugs: 587039 - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/ziproxy/ziproxy_3.1.1-1.dsc I'll look in the evening! Uploaded -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87vd94yilb@chillida.ipv6.sieglitzhof.net
Re: RFS: netstat-nat (updated package, QA upload)
Johann Felix Soden joh...@gmx.de writes: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4.10-1 of the package netstat-nat. Uploaded! Regards Christoph pgpNsiMsZFG0P.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: latex-mk (updated package)
Wences René Arana Fuentes arana...@gmail.com writes: - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/latex-mk/latex-mk_2.0-2.dsc Hi! Could you please remove the config.* patch from debian/patches? Looks fine otherwise (as far as I've checked). Regards Christophp -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87sk497r6t@chillida.ipv6.sieglitzhof.net
Re: RFS: ziproxy (updated package)
Marcos Talau ta...@users.sourceforge.net writes: The upload would fix these bugs: 587039 - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/ziproxy/ziproxy_3.1.1-1.dsc Hi! I'll look in the evening! Regards Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ocex7kum@chillida.ipv6.sieglitzhof.net
[uploaded] RFS: vttest (updated package)
Wen-Yen Chuang ca...@calno.com writes: vttest (2.7+20100528-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release * Update debian/copyright * Switch debian/rules to new dh format - update Build-Depends debhelper (= 7.0.50) - update debian/compat to level 7 * Bump Standards-Versions to 3.8.4 - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vttest/vttest_2.7+20100528-1.dsc Hi! Uploaded, all fine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8739wji3zg@chillida.ipv6.sieglitzhof.net
Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, many fixes, DMUA candidate) (3nd try)
Hi! Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de writes: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4-1 of my package squidguard. it supplants the very old version 1.2. And I would be most grateful if a kind sponsor would set the DM-Upload-Allowed (DMUA) flag before uploading :) It builds these binary packages: squidguard - filter and redirector plugin for Squid squidguard-doc - filter and redirector plugin for Squid - Documentation The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 372709, 385093, 403875, 491673, 514636, 535158, 541602, 548489, 576169 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/squidguard - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/squidguard/squidguard_1.4-1.dsc I have created a git repository: - Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/squidguard.git - Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/squidguard.git Some more infos about squidguard: - Homepage: http://www.squidguard.org I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. debian/copyright seems to miss the whole libwww stuff I'll keep a copy of this package around so if that's fixed uploading should be doable in no time just checking the diff. Regards Christop -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87y6ebgoft@chillida.ipv6.sieglitzhof.net
Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, ...) / libwww stuff
Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de writes: Hello, Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org wrote on 2010-06-19 15:08: debian/copyright seems to miss the whole libwww stuff I'll keep a copy of this package around so if that's fixed uploading should be doable in no time just checking the diff. I'm not understand: what is libwww stuff? Is the package not ready for upload? the copyright file based on the template of dh_make. The package was sponsored today, but for the future I want to know what I can make better. There are some files coming from libwww (a w3c project it seems). They do e.g. have a different license that should be mentioned in debian/copyright (you might want to take a look if that library should be put into a separat package as well). Regards Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87tyozgci6@chillida.ipv6.sieglitzhof.net
Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, ...) / libwww stuff
Hi! Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de writes: Do you used a special program to find these different licenses in the source code? Well licensecheck is usefull for that task. Especially for packages with small number of files just a find -type f -exec less is not that much work (and the reliable option anyway). Regards Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87pqzmhldx@chillida.ipv6.sieglitzhof.net
Re: Asking for DMUA: Yes while seeking first sponsor
David Paleino da...@debian.org writes: On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:14:54 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl toli...@debian.org wrote: I noticed that recently some people seem to seek first time sponsors while asking for setting the DM-Upload-Allowed: yes flag at the very same time. This isn't the only misuse of DMUA that exists, some people set it in their package instead of asking the sponsor to set it. It's our duty to check if DMUA is set or not. Never, EVER, review a package only based on a changelog. Sure just sponsors are also humans and make mistakes (like missing a added field in debian/control) If I am unhappy with DMUA for a specific maintainer+package pair, I talk to the maintainer, and tell her I can upload only without DMUA because I don't believe she is ready for unattended uploads. If she agrees, I simply drop that line from debian/control and upload the package -- otherwise she just goes and looks for another sponsor. Well I tend to just drop any package that silently sets DMUA or even asks directly for it (please consider is ok I've set DMUA is not for me) so probably one of the easy ways to get in toe queue of people not finding a sponsor. Regards Christoph pgpxTfL3f2bs2.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Asking for DMUA: Yes while seeking first sponsor
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl toli...@debian.org writes: [..] [ uploading a package multiple times without DMUA:Yes] Thankfully I was under the debian-med umbrella, otherwise I would have gone mad, if every time I would have had to search for a DD. [..] Uhm... Why? I guess it's more the rule than the exception to contact the previous sponsor for an uploaded, and only seek a new one, should the first one be busy. And sponsoring a upload with a trivial diff is just a few minutes. If that's clear from the mail I guess most sponsors handle these in a couple of hourse (when online) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87aaqw9rwq@chillida.ipv6.sieglitzhof.net
Re: RFS: webfs (updated package)
Mats Erik Andersson mats.anders...@gisladisker.se writes: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.21+ds1-5 of my package webfs. Uploaded -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/874oh7c9u4@chillida.ipv6.sieglitzhof.net
Re: RFS: ziproxy (updated package)
Hi! I've just uploaded ziproxy! Regards Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87wru3auyg@chillida.ipv6.sieglitzhof.net
Re: RFS: mcron
Hi! Dale Mellor dale_mel...@users.sourceforge.net writes: The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mcron - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mcron/mcron_1.0.5-1.dsc Thanks a lot for the really detailed information about that package. The general packaging looks really well (at least as deep as I've dug right now), however your build-depends seem to not be complete (build fails because ed is missing -- see log, autotools-dev doesn't seem to be used). You can catch these problems using one of pbuilder, cowbuilder or sbuild (maybe there are also others) that try the build in a clean environment (sbuild is what is actually used on the autobuilders). I haven't done a full review yet but will complete that once you've fixed the build issue. Regards Christoph dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: guile-1.8-dev W: Unmet build-dependency in source dpkg-buildpackage: export CPPFLAGS from dpkg-buildflags (origin: vendor): dpkg-buildpackage: export CFLAGS from dpkg-buildflags (origin: vendor): -g -O2 dpkg-buildpackage: export CXXFLAGS from dpkg-buildflags (origin: vendor): -g -O2 dpkg-buildpackage: export FFLAGS from dpkg-buildflags (origin: vendor): -g -O2 dpkg-buildpackage: export LDFLAGS from dpkg-buildflags (origin: vendor): dpkg-buildpackage: source package mcron dpkg-buildpackage: source version 1.0.5-1 dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Dale Mellor dale_mel...@users.sourceforge.net dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: guile-1.8-dev dpkg-buildpackage: warning: Build dependencies/conflicts unsatisfied; aborting. dpkg-buildpackage: warning: (Use -d flag to override.) dpkg-buildpackage: warning: This is currently a non-fatal warning with -S, but dpkg-buildpackage: warning: will probably become fatal in the future. fakeroot debian/rules clean dh clean dh_testdir dh_auto_clean dh_clean dpkg-source -i -ICVS -I.svn -I.git -b mcron-1.0.5 dpkg-source: info: using source format `3.0 (quilt)' dpkg-source: info: building mcron using existing ./mcron_1.0.5.orig.tar.gz dpkg-source: info: local changes stored in mcron-1.0.5/debian/patches/debian-changes-1.0.5-1, the modified files are: mcron-1.0.5/makefile.in dpkg-source: info: building mcron in mcron_1.0.5-1.debian.tar.gz dpkg-source: info: building mcron in mcron_1.0.5-1.dsc dpkg-genchanges -S ../mcron_1.0.5-1_source.changes dpkg-genchanges: including full source code in upload dpkg-buildpackage: full upload (original source is included) - Copying COW directory forking: rm -rf /media/extern/debian/buildplace/cow.23441 forking: cp -al /media/extern/debian/bases/sid.cow /media/extern/debian/buildplace/cow.23441 I: removed stale ilistfile /media/extern/debian/buildplace/cow.23441/.ilist forking: chroot /media/extern/debian/buildplace/cow.23441 cowdancer-ilistcreate /.ilist find . -xdev -path ./home -prune -o \( \( -type l -o -type f \) -a -links +1 -print0 \) | xargs -0 stat --format '%d %i ' - Invoking pbuilder forking: pbuilder build --debbuildopts --debbuildopts -i -ICVS -I.svn -I.git --aptcache /media/extern/debian/aptcache --buildplace /media/extern/debian/buildplace/cow.23441 --buildresult /media/extern/debian/packages --debbuildopts -i -ICVS -I.svn -I.git --no-targz --internal-chrootexec chroot /media/extern/debian/buildplace/cow.23441 cow-shell /media/extern/debian/packages/mcron_1.0.5-1.dsc I: Running in no-targz mode I: using fakeroot in build. I: Current time: Sun Jun 13 20:02:09 CEST 2010 I: pbuilder-time-stamp: 1276452129 I: copying local configuration I: mounting /proc filesystem I: mounting /dev/pts filesystem I: policy-rc.d already exists I: Obtaining the cached apt archive contents I: Installing the build-deps - Attempting to satisfy build-dependencies - Creating pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy package Package: pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy Version: 0.invalid.0 Architecture: i386 Maintainer: Debian Pbuilder Team pbuilder-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org Description: Dummy package to satisfy dependencies with aptitude - created by pbuilder This package was created automatically by pbuilder and should Depends: debhelper (= 7.0.50~), autotools-dev, guile-1.8-dev dpkg-deb: building package `pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy' in `/tmp/satisfydepends-aptitude/pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy.deb'. Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information... aptitude is already the newest version. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Selecting previously deselected package pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy. (Reading database ... 11220 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy (from .../pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy.deb) ... dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy: pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy
Re: question about debian/watch
Hi! Elías Alejandro eal...@gmail.com writes: Hi all, I'm working with the new radiotray's version (http://sourceforge.net/projects/radiotray/files/) , it's new version 0.6, however doing: uscan --verbose it just show me: Newest version on remote site is 0.5.1, local version is 0.6 = remote site does not even have current version -- Scan finishedhttp://sf.net/radiotray/radiotray-(.*)\.tar\.gz I'd guess the qa.d.o wrapper just hasn't updated yet. So if it doesn't go away in a few days I#d start to worry but ignore for now Regards Christoph pgpAUjoJPBGb6.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: ziproxy (updated package)
Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org writes: Hi again! http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/ziproxy/ziproxy_3.1.0-1.dsc Some comments below /--- +# we build arm without optimization for now... +DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS := $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH_OS 2/dev/null) +ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU), arm) +CFLAGS += -O0 +endif \--- You set ARCH_OS (linux|kfreebsd|hurd) to check ARCH_CPU afterwards? doesn't look that usefull /--- + * Disable optimization on arm (LP: #539874) \--- Actually I'd rather not apply such a workaround for a problem that is caused by different choice of supported architecture between ubuntu and debian and only present in ubuntu. The bug says it shou8ld eventually be fixed in gcc and 'till then I guess it's one of the valid reasons for a ubuntu diff. Though I'd upload it that way as well /--- + * Removed patch for Russian man page \--- You might want to say why you dropped it in the changelog (was it accepted upstream ?) Regards Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87iq5ux9tx@chillida.ipv6.sieglitzhof.net
Re: RFS: ziproxy (updated package)
Hi! Marcos Talau ta...@users.sourceforge.net writes: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.1.0-1 of my package ziproxy. It builds these binary packages: ziproxy- compressing HTTP proxy server The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 581153 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/ziproxy - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/ziproxy/ziproxy_3.1.0-1.dsc I'll have a look tomorrow. Regards Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87bpbnzunu@chillida.ipv6.sieglitzhof.net
Re: RFS: xboard (updated package)
Hi! On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 03:21:04PM +0800, Vincent Legout wrote: The request is still valid. I guess Christoph didn't have enough time to review it. Yeah I'm very sorry about that. Didn't quite work out like I thought and I find it hard at the moment to find a timeslot and motivation to review a larger package. I hope you find someone here who'll upload it for you Sorry Christoph -- /\ ASCII Ribbon : GPG-Key ID: 0xD49AE731 \ /Campaign : CaCert Assurer X against HTML : Debian Developer / \ in eMails : http://www.debian.org/ http://www.christoph-egger.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: webfs (updated package)
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 04:07:21PM +0200, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the version 1.21+ds1-4 of my package webfs. Hi! I'll upload in a minute. Regards Christoph -- /\ ASCII Ribbon : GPG-Key ID: 0xD49AE731 \ /Campaign : CaCert Assurer X against HTML : Debian Developer / \ in eMails : http://www.debian.org/ http://www.christoph-egger.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: xboard (updated package)
Hi! On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:20:06PM +0800, Vincent Legout wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.4.3-1 of my package xboard. It builds these binary packages: xboard - An X Window System Chess Board The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 566190 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xboard - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xboard/xboard_4.4.3-1.dsc I've already had a quick look when I noticed it at the wiki but didn't go further due to lack of time. If noone wants to be faster, I'll review over the weekend. Regards Christoph -- /\ ASCII Ribbon : GPG-Key ID: 0xD49AE731 \ /Campaign : CaCert Assurer X against HTML : Debian Developer / \ in eMails : http://www.debian.org/ http://www.christoph-egger.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: gmameui
Hi! On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:10:07PM +0200, M. van Brummelen wrote: I prepared a NMU for gmameui. It builds these binary packages: gmameui- front-end for the arcade games emulator MAME The upload would fix this (serious) bug: 547699 I'm going to upload this after I finished building, thanks for your QA work! Regards Christoph -- /\ ASCII Ribbon : GPG-Key ID: 0xD49AE731 \ /Campaign : CaCert Assurer X against HTML : Debian Developer / \ in eMails : http://www.debian.org/ http://www.christoph-egger.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: latex-mk (updated package, QA upload)
Hi! On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:55:27AM +0800, Vincent Legout wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0-1 of my package latex-mk. It builds these binary packages: latex-mk - tool for managing LaTeX projects Uploaded! Thanks :) Regards Christoph -- /\ ASCII Ribbon : GPG-Key ID: 0xD49AE731 \ /Campaign : CaCert Assurer X against HTML : Debian Developer / \ in eMails : http://www.debian.org/ http://www.christoph-egger.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: pyamf
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 07:39:57PM -0430, Miguel Landaeta wrote: Hi Christoph, On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 5:15 AM, Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org wrote: I've just having a look at it. Below you can find some random points I noticed. * the BSD licene in common-licenses tells (c) The Regents of the University of California -- it is unsuitable for everything but original BSD software. Please just include a copy in your copyright (or use the MIT license that is already there). I just adopted this package and the debian bits were already licensed under BSD. Surely I can change the license to MIT, but I preferred to keep the license chose by the previous maintainer. Now, for example so many packages license the debian dir with GPL and use the text in common-licences and it tells Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc but AFAIK it doesn't mean that FSF own that software. Or am I wrong? The GPL says /--- Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. http://fsf.org/ Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed. \--- claiming copyright for the license to the FSF while the BSD license does the same for the same for the software - regents of Berkley. For the GPL you have these some paragraphes long part in your copright file which includes copyright notices for the authors. THat's the difference. * There's a patch included in your package. It is not at all clear why it must be there, whether it has been forwarded (or if that could be done) nor anything else. Please comment your patch. I found out this patch was useless and it was removed. * Your watchfile doesn't seem to work very well % uscan --report-status uscan warning: In debian/watch, no matching hrefs for pattern http://download.pyamf.org/releases/([\d.]+) at /usr/bin/uscan line 1571, WATCH line 2. uscan warning: In watchfile debian/watch, reading webpage http://download.pyamf.org/releases/1/ failed: 404 Not Found Yes, upstream changed the URLs, but this is already fixed. OK then as Jakub wanted to do the review already which I didn't notice I guess he'll continue. Regards Christoph -- /\ ASCII Ribbon : GPG-Key ID: 0xD49AE731 \ /Campaign : CaCert Assurer X against HTML : Debian Developer / \ in eMails : http://www.debian.org/ http://www.christoph-egger.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: jackbeat (updated package)
Hi! On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 02:25:58PM +0200, M. van Brummelen wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7.4-1.1 of my package jackbeat. It builds these binary packages: jackbeat - a drum machine-like audio sequencer with JACK support The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix a (serious)bug: 571961 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jackbeat - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jackbeat/jackbeat_0.7.4-1.1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Please make it clear in your RFS that you are, in fact, looking for an sponsor for an NMU and not for an update for one of your packages. (Having something like RC fix NMU in your mail's subject might actually help finding sponsors!). jackbeat isn't currently in testing because of its 2 open RC bugs where you fix one of them. After that it still won't enter testing so if you care for this program you'll probably have to fix the other one as well. If you're on a general RC bug hunt it does make sense to priorize packages in testing as these bugs affect the release. Having said that, your fix looks good and I'll upload it as soon as it finished building. Regards Christoph -- /\ ASCII Ribbon : GPG-Key ID: 0xD49AE731 \ /Campaign : CaCert Assurer X against HTML : Debian Developer / \ in eMails : http://www.debian.org/ http://www.christoph-egger.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: pyamf
Hi! On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:35:10AM -0430, Miguel Landaeta wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package pyamf. * Package name: pyamf Version : 0.5.1-1 Upstream Author : The PyAMF Project d...@pyamf.org * URL : http://pyamf.org/ * License : MIT Section : python It builds these binary packages: python-pyamf - Action Message Format support for Python python-pyamf-doc - documentation for the Python AMF support The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 499617 My motivation for maintaining this package is: I'm developing software that Depends on this. I would like to maintain this under Debian Python Modules Team. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pyamf - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pyamf/pyamf_0.5.1-1.dsc - Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/python-modules/packages/pyamf/trunk/ I've just having a look at it. Below you can find some random points I noticed. * the BSD licene in common-licenses tells (c) The Regents of the University of California -- it is unsuitable for everything but original BSD software. Please just include a copy in your copyright (or use the MIT license that is already there). * There's a patch included in your package. It is not at all clear why it must be there, whether it has been forwarded (or if that could be done) nor anything else. Please comment your patch. * Your watchfile doesn't seem to work very well % uscan --report-status uscan warning: In debian/watch, no matching hrefs for pattern http://download.pyamf.org/releases/([\d.]+) at /usr/bin/uscan line 1571, WATCH line 2. uscan warning: In watchfile debian/watch, reading webpage http://download.pyamf.org/releases/1/ failed: 404 Not Found Regards Christoph -- /\ ASCII Ribbon : GPG-Key ID: 0xD49AE731 \ /Campaign : CaCert Assurer X against HTML : Debian Developer / \ in eMails : http://www.debian.org/ http://www.christoph-egger.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: windowlab (updated package)
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 05:10:28PM +0200, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.40-1 of my package windowlab. It builds these binary packages: windowlab - small and simple Amiga-like window manager The package appears to be lintian clean and builds well using pbuilder. The upload would fix the bug 575793. The upstream author has resolved an otherwise blocking call in X.org. You're still having that problematic licensed bit of code. If you think it's no problem, could you please document that in debian/copyright? +/* Copyright (c) Mark J. Kilgard, 1994, 1995, 1996. */ + +/* This program is freely distributable without licensing fees + * and is provided without guarantee or warrantee expressed or + * implied. This program is -not- in the public domain. */ The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/windowlab - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/windowlab/windowlab_1.40-1.dsc You've now replaced build: dh build with build: dh @ Any reason you don't do a general %: dh @ that would fit all targets? Regards Christoph -- /\ ASCII Ribbon : GPG-Key ID: 0xD49AE731 \ /Campaign : CaCert Assurer X against HTML : Debian Developer / \ in eMails : http://www.debian.org/ http://www.christoph-egger.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: django-picklefield (updated package)
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 11:39:36AM +0200, Michael Fladischer wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.5-1 of my package django-picklefield. Doesn't look like there's already a version in the archive. I guess Jakub wants to take a look at this package as he has already worked on it, if not I'd give it a try. Regards Christoph -- /\ ASCII Ribbon : GPG-Key ID: 0xD49AE731 \ /Campaign : CaCert Assurer X against HTML : Debian Maintainer / \ in eMails : http://www.debian.org/ http://www.christoph-egger.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: coffeescript
Hi! As you might have noticed, I've just uploaded the package. Regards Christoph -- /\ ASCII Ribbon : GPG-Key ID: 0xD49AE731 \ /Campaign : CaCert Assurer X against HTML : Debian Developer / \ in eMails : http://www.debian.org/ http://www.christoph-egger.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
