Bug#977807: RFS: far2l/2.2+git20201201-1 [ITP] -- Linux port of FAR v2
El 21/12/20 a las 05:27, Gürkan Myczko escribió: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "far2l": * Package name: far2l Version : 2.2+git20201201-1 Upstream Author : * URL : https://github.com/elfmz/far2l * License : GPL-2+ * Vcs : [fill in URL of packaging vcs] Section : non-free/utils It builds those binary packages: far2l - Linux port of FAR v2 To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/far2l/ Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/f/far2l/far2l_2.2+git20201201-1.dsc Changes for the initial release: far2l (2.2+git20201201-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Initial release. (Closes: #977790) Regards, ohhh! the mc will be scared Cool package, i hope can be upload to debian archive! good look! -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Re: search for sponsor for osc2midi and multimail
El 4/1/20 a las 01:07, John Scott escribió: > On Friday, January 3, 2020 8:40:37 PM EST Fernando Toledo wrote: >> Hi! im search for sponsor to these two packages!! >> >> https://mentors.debian.net/package/multimail >> >> https://mentors.debian.net/package/osc2midi > > Disclaimer: I'm not a Debian Developer and can't sponsor packages. But I spot > trouble in the upstream part of multimail and would like to help. It's in > this > part of the Makefile: > ifeq ($(DEBUG),Y) > OPTS = -g -Wall -pedantic > else > OPTS = -O2 -Wall -pedantic > POST = strip mm$(E) > endif Hi Scott! i update the makefile patch to fix the compiler options: https://github.com/ftoledo/pkg-multimail/blob/e7bd96b14461a54acef69c3e4a30a569889da498/debian/patches/001_update_makefile.patch Why lintian still show me that on mentors? : Package has lintian informational warnings multimail I hardening-no-bindnow usr/bin/mm I hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/bin/mm Thanks again! -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Bug#942358: RFS: osc2midi/0.2.5-1 Highly flexible and configurable OSC / JACK MIDI bridge
El 20/10/19 a las 18:26, Fernando Toledo escribió: > El 20/10/19 a las 18:14, Adam Borowski escribió: >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 01:52:37AM -0300, Fernando Toledo wrote: >>> * Package name: osc2midi >>>Version : 0.2.5-1 >> >>> Changes since the last upload: >>> >>>* Initial release (Closes: #942333) >> >> Hi! >> I'm afraid that the copyright file requires some work. >> >> According to you, the only used licenses are: >> Files: * >> Copyright: 2019 Spencer Jackson >> License: GPL-3+ >> >> Files: debian/* >> Copyright: 2019 Fernando Toledo >> License: GPL-2+ >> >> Yet I see for example a 2014 BSD2 file. >> But, that one can be somewhat argued to be covered by the global license. >> A more troubling part is: >> >> // Original code by Frank Pfenning from CMU (https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~fp/), >> see >> // https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~fp/courses/15122-f10/lectures/22-mem/. The code >> // doesn't carry any license notes and thus presumably is in the public >> // domain. >> >> /* Hash tables (fixed size) >> * 15-122 Principles of Imperative Computation, Fall 2010 >> * Frank Pfenning >> */ >> >> While I consider copyright laws to be a crime against humanity, we are >> forced to obey them. And according to them, code without any license cannot >> be distributed at all by anyone but the copyright holder. >> >> Thus sorry, but until a license is found/granted, or this file replaced, the >> package cannot be uploaded, not even to non-free. Perhaps there's a blanket >> statement somewhere? >> >> >> Meow! >> > thanks Adam, i will contact the author to these files, to clarify the > licence status! and reupload to mentors if can fix it. > > > > Hi Adam, you have been cc in the message thread with Frank Pfenning, he agreed to license the files under the gpl license Can you telme if i need another step? These letters should be included into the package as evidence of the agreetment? Thanks you! Saludos! -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Re: search for sponsor for osc2midi and multimail
El 4/1/20 a las 09:16, Tobias Frost escribió: > Hi Fernando, > > On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 10:40:37PM -0300, Fernando Toledo wrote: > >> Hi! im search for sponsor to these two packages!! >> >> https://mentors.debian.net/package/multimail >> >> https://mentors.debian.net/package/osc2midi > > Please open RFS bugs against the sponsorship-requests pseudo > package... This usually works best nowerdays... > > >> thanks! >> >> -- >> Fernando Toledo >> Dock Sud BBS >> http://bbs.docksud.com.ar >> telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar >> already have the bugs with no luck =( (multimail have many years) https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942358 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=933671 thanks you! -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
search for sponsor for osc2midi and multimail
Hi! im search for sponsor to these two packages!! https://mentors.debian.net/package/multimail https://mentors.debian.net/package/osc2midi thanks! -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Bug#942358: RFS: osc2midi/0.2.5-1 Highly flexible and configurable OSC / JACK MIDI bridge
El 20/10/19 a las 18:14, Adam Borowski escribió: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 01:52:37AM -0300, Fernando Toledo wrote: >> * Package name: osc2midi >>Version : 0.2.5-1 > >> Changes since the last upload: >> >>* Initial release (Closes: #942333) > > Hi! > I'm afraid that the copyright file requires some work. > > According to you, the only used licenses are: > Files: * > Copyright: 2019 Spencer Jackson > License: GPL-3+ > > Files: debian/* > Copyright: 2019 Fernando Toledo > License: GPL-2+ > > Yet I see for example a 2014 BSD2 file. > But, that one can be somewhat argued to be covered by the global license. > A more troubling part is: > > // Original code by Frank Pfenning from CMU (https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~fp/), see > // https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~fp/courses/15122-f10/lectures/22-mem/. The code > // doesn't carry any license notes and thus presumably is in the public > // domain. > > /* Hash tables (fixed size) > * 15-122 Principles of Imperative Computation, Fall 2010 > * Frank Pfenning > */ > > While I consider copyright laws to be a crime against humanity, we are > forced to obey them. And according to them, code without any license cannot > be distributed at all by anyone but the copyright holder. > > Thus sorry, but until a license is found/granted, or this file replaced, the > package cannot be uploaded, not even to non-free. Perhaps there's a blanket > statement somewhere? > > > Meow! > thanks Adam, i will contact the author to these files, to clarify the licence status! and reupload to mentors if can fix it. -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Re: uploads on ftp's do not work
El 15/10/19 a las 02:56, Geert Stappers escribió: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 07:07:25PM -0300, Fernando Toledo wrote: >> Hi people, >> the ftp won't process previous uploads and sems to qeue still hang. >> >> Anybody can verify this? > > Or state a "works for me"? > > > Regards > Geert Stappers > Shortly after seeing https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942358 > Sorry i forgot mention that was solved by admins. I could upload the package. Thank a lot! -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Bug#942358: RFS: osc2midi/0.2.5-1 Highly flexible and configurable OSC / JACK MIDI bridge
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "osc2midi" * Package name: osc2midi Version : 0.2.5-1 Upstream Author : ssjackso...@gmail.com * URL : https://github.com/ssj71/OSC2MIDI * License : GPL-3+ * Vcs : https://github.com/ftoledo/pkg-osc2midi Section : sound It builds those binary packages: osc2midi - Highly flexible and configurable OSC / JACK MIDI bridge To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/osc2midi Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/osc2midi/osc2midi_0.2.5-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: #942333) Regards, -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
uploads on ftp's do not work
Hi people, the ftp won't process previous uploads and sems to qeue still hang. Anybody can verify this? #:~/paquetes/result/debian/unstable/amd64$ dput -f mentors-ftp multimail_0.52-1_amd64.changes Checking signature on .changes gpg: /home/ragnarok/paquetes/result/debian/unstable/amd64/multimail_0.52-1_amd64.changes: Valid signature from AE46B87B887B8BE3 Checking signature on .dsc gpg: /home/ragnarok/paquetes/result/debian/unstable/amd64/multimail_0.52-1.dsc: Valid signature from AE46B87B887B8BE3 Uploading to mentors-ftp (via ftp to mentors.debian.net): Uploading multimail_0.52-1.dsc: 553 Could not create file. Leaving existing multimail_0.52-1.dsc on the server and continuing NOTE: This existing file may have been previously uploaded partially. For official Debian upload queues, the dcut(1) utility can be used to remove this file, and after an acknowledgement mail is received in response to dcut, the upload can be re-initiated. Uploading multimail_0.52.orig.tar.gz: 553 Could not create file. Leaving existing multimail_0.52.orig.tar.gz on the server and continuing NOTE: This existing file may have been previously uploaded partially. For official Debian upload queues, the dcut(1) utility can be used to remove this file, and after an acknowledgement mail is received in response to dcut, the upload can be re-initiated. Uploading multimail_0.52-1.debian.tar.xz: 553 Could not create file. Leaving existing multimail_0.52-1.debian.tar.xz on the server and continuing NOTE: This existing file may have been previously uploaded partially. For official Debian upload queues, the dcut(1) utility can be used to remove this file, and after an acknowledgement mail is received in response to dcut, the upload can be re-initiated. Uploading multimail_0.52-1_amd64.buildinfo: 553 Could not create file. Leaving existing multimail_0.52-1_amd64.buildinfo on the server and continuing NOTE: This existing file may have been previously uploaded partially. For official Debian upload queues, the dcut(1) utility can be used to remove this file, and after an acknowledgement mail is received in response to dcut, the upload can be re-initiated. Uploading multimail_0.52-1_amd64.deb: 553 Could not create file. Leaving existing multimail_0.52-1_amd64.deb on the server and continuing NOTE: This existing file may have been previously uploaded partially. For official Debian upload queues, the dcut(1) utility can be used to remove this file, and after an acknowledgement mail is received in response to dcut, the upload can be re-initiated. Uploading multimail_0.52-1_amd64.changes: 553 Could not create file. Leaving existing multimail_0.52-1_amd64.changes on the server and continuing NOTE: This existing file may have been previously uploaded partially. For official Debian upload queues, the dcut(1) utility can be used to remove this file, and after an acknowledgement mail is received in response to dcut, the upload can be re-initiated. Successfully uploaded packages. thanks! -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Bug#933671: RFS: multimail/0.52-1
El 1/8/19 a las 17:43, Adam Borowski escribió: > On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 01:57:51PM -0300, Fernando Toledo wrote: >> * Package name: multimail >>Version : 0.52-1 > >> Changes since the last upload: >> >> adjust patch and build version 0.52 >> >> https://github.com/ftoledo/pkg-multimail/blob/master/debian/changelog > > At a brief glance, the package seems ok, but the changelog has a lot of > confusion wrt who's maintaining it: first there's a not-in-archive adoption > by Robert James Clay, then your NMU, then a seemingly regular entry. > Could you please describe that in a more obvious way? > > I haven't yet reviewed the package well enough for 11 years of neglect. > > > Meow! > Yeah i think so too, Peter Karlsson was the mantainer up to 0.49 Then, Robert try to update the package and build the 0.50 that i think that never was included on debian archive. Due to lack of updates i want to try to keep the software. (and build 0.51 and now 0.52) Should the lines of the versions (0.50 and 0.51) be eliminated? and let the 0.49 and 0.52? thanks for help! -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Bug#933671: RFS: multimail/0.52-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "multimail" * Package name: multimail Version : 0.52-1 Upstream Author : MultiMail was originally developed under Linux by Kolossvary Tamas and Toth Istvan. John Zero was the maintainer for versions 0.2 through 0.6; since version 0.7, the maintainer is William McBrine wmcbr...@gmail.com * URL : https://github.com/wmcbrine/MultiMail * License : GPL-3 Section : mail It builds those binary packages: multimail - Offline reader for Blue Wave, QWK, OMEN and SOUP To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/multimail Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/multimail/multimail_0.52-1.dsc More information about multimail can be obtained from http://wmcbrine.com/mmail/ Changes since the last upload: adjust patch and build version 0.52 https://github.com/ftoledo/pkg-multimail/blob/master/debian/changelog Muchas gracias! -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
RFS: multiblend/0.6.2-1 multi-level image blender for the seamless blending of panoramic
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "multiblend" * Package name: multiblend Version : 0.6.2-1 Upstream Author : David Horman * URL : http://horman.net/multiblend/ * License : GPL-2+ Section : graphics It builds those binary packages: multiblend - multi-level image blender for the seamless blending of panoramic To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/multiblend Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/multiblend/multiblend_0.6.2-1.dsc More information about multiblend can be obtained from http://horman.net/multiblend/ Regards, Fernando Toledo -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Bug#911779: RFS: multiblend/0.6.2-1 multi-level image blender for the seamless blending of panoramic
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "multiblend" * Package name: multiblend Version : 0.6.2-1 Upstream Author : David Horman * URL : http://horman.net/multiblend/ * License : GPL-2+ Section : graphics It builds those binary packages: multiblend - multi-level image blender for the seamless blending of panoramic To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/multiblend Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/multiblend/multiblend_0.6.2-1.dsc More information about multiblend can be obtained from http://horman.net/multiblend/ Regards, Fernando Toledo -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Bug#777651: RFS: syncterm/1.0+dfsg-1 [ITP]
dfsg part was cryplib and was removed via patch (the app can be
used without that lib)
> automatic checks from check-all-the-things:
>
> $ env PERL5OPT=-m-lib=. cme check dpkg
> [lots]
> $ codespell --quiet-level=3
> [lots]
> $ cppcheck -j1 --quiet -f .
> [lots]
> $ find -type f -iname '*.desktop' -exec desktop-file-validate {} \;
> [some]
> $ fdupes -q -r . | grep -vE
> '/(\.(git|svn|bzr|hg|sgdrawer)|_(darcs|FOSSIL_)|CVS)(/|$)' | cat -s
> [lots]
> $ flawfinder -Q -c .
> [some]
>
> and so on
> $ suspicious-source
> ./src/uifc/uifc.c
check-all-the-things are cool tool! I did not know
I will use now it for every package!
i upload again to mentors:
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/syncterm/syncterm_1.0+dfsg-1.dsc
thanks, I really very apprecited your review.
--
Fernando Toledo
Dock Sud BBS
http://bbs.docksud.com.ar
telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Bug#777651: RFS: syncterm/1.0+dfsg-1 [ITP]
El 16/08/16 a las 09:15, Gianfranco Costamagna escribió: > control: tags -1 moreinf > > Hi, > >>* Initial release (Closes: #739035) > lets try a review: > > 1) std-version is 3.9.8 now > > 2) debhelper (>= 9), libncurses5-dev (>= 5.9), > unzip (>= 6.0), libsdl2-dev (>= 2.0.2), libsdl1.2-dev (>= 1.2.15), > gcc (>= 4:4.9) Gianfranco!! Thanks you very much for your detailed review! =) I will working on fix on next week! -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Bug#777651: RFS: syncterm/1.0+dfsg-1 [ITP]
Hi all!!! i'm still search for sponsor for Syncterm! Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "syncterm" * Package name: syncterm Version : 1.0+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Deuce <sy...@nix.synchro.net> * URL : http://syncterm.bbsdev.net/ * License : LGPL Section : comm It builds those binary packages: syncterm - BBS terminal program from Synchronet To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/syncterm Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/syncterm/syncterm_1.0+dfsg-1.dsc More information about syncterm package can be obtained from https://github.com/ftoledo/pkg-syncterm Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: #739035) Thanks all!! -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Bug#777651: closing RFS: syncterm/1.0+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- BBS terminal program from Synchronet
El 26/07/16 a las 12:31, Gianfranco Costamagna escribió: > control: reopen -1 > control: unarchive -1 > control: owner -1 jgoer...@complete.org > > On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 04:33:09 + Bart Martens <ba...@quantz.debian.org> > wrote: >> Package syncterm has been removed from mentors. > > lets try to cc everybody :) > > thanks > > G. > Thanks! I just upload again to mentors. I still search for sponsor Saludos! -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]
On Sun, 15 May 2016 15:13:34 + Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi Robert! > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 03:52:07PM -0500, Robert James Clay wrote: > >I'm afraid that I got rather heavily tied up in other things and so > > haven't > > been able to work on this as much as I'd like... Should I perhaps > > temporarily > > close the RFS bug and reopen it when I have an updated version of the > > package > > done and uploaded to mentors? (Note that the next package update will also > > include a new snapshot.) > > Givent that I received no follow up on this, I'm closing this RFS > ticket. Feel free to either open a new one once you start again working > on this, or continue directly with Tobi in the ITA bug, or anything you > like. > > -- > regards, > Mattia Rizzolo > > GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. > more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : > Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` > Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- Hi all, i'm use this package and i like if should be update. can re-upload to mentors and publish the VCS? i wish to help. Saludos! -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Bug#817005: RFS: aseqjoy/0.0.1-1 [ITP]
El 10/05/16 a las 17:22, Gianfranco Costamagna escribió: > > can you please fix the copyright? > (I can also look at a "lintian-problematic" file and tell you what is wrong > in that case, > otherwise my answer is too generic I admit) > > thanks! > > Gianfranco > fixed, uploaded again and lintian happy! ;) -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Bug#817005: RFS: aseqjoy/0.0.1-1 [ITP]
El 09/05/16 a las 12:10, Gianfranco Costamagna escribió: > yes, thanks Alexander for your effort, I personally don't like restricting > licenses, > specially when they are just an honest upstream mistake! > > Gianfranco > > Hello all! https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aseqjoy/aseqjoy_0.0.2-1.dsc I just upload to mentors. Note: I fix the lintian https://lintian.debian.org/tags/dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique.html warning using this copyright file format: Files: * Copyright: 2010 Alexander Koenig <a...@lisas.de> 2016 Fernando Toledo <ragna...@docksud.com.ar> License: GPL-2+ This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. . This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. Is correct? I think that may confuse to that i are upstream author using Files: * If use Files: * (for the upstream) and Files: debian/* (for mantainer) and both have same license this raise the lintian warning. If my patches have same license. Is it the better way to generate the copyright file? Thanks! -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Bug#817005: RFS: aseqjoy/0.0.1-1 [ITP]
El 07/05/16 a las 08:31, Alexander Koenig escribió: > On Fri, May 06, 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > <..> >> I would appreciate however a new tarball, because I don't like having to >> tell ftpmasters >> where to look in the mail list for the license change. > > OK, to settle this I created a new aseqjoy release, that should remove all > license > ambiguities. > > http://terminatorx.org/files/aseqjoy-0.0.2.tar.gz > > Hope this helps, > Regards, > Alex > Great news! thanks Alexander! I will build the package from that tarball and upload to mentors ASAP! Saludos! -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Bug#817005: RFS: aseqjoy/0.0.1-1 [ITP]
El 29/04/16 a las 18:31, Adam Borowski escribió: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 08:45:27PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >>> Fixed. Is possible to have upstream => gpl2 and debian/* => gpl3, true? >> >> this means that it will be impossible to forward patches upstream without >> manually >> relicensing them. >> >> I personally don't prefer, because only the author of each patch will be >> able to forward >> it upstream. > > It's worse: as the package is built from sources under mutually conflicting > licenses, it is indistributable. > > As both the packaging and the only patch come exclusively from you, I'd > simply change the license for debian/* to GPL-2+ (but, see below). > >> licensecheck * >> shows the license of some files as GPL-2+ not GPL-2 > > It looks like there's a mismatch: > > README says: > # Copyright 2003 by Alexander K.nig - a...@lisas.de > # License: GPL V2 - see the file COPYING > (COPYING is the text of GPL-2) > > but, aseqjoy.c says: > # or (at your option) any later version. > > Too bad, while it's the only C source, there's one more copyrightable file, > aseqjoy.1.in, which doesn't embed a license statement and thus is covered by > the README. > > So unless you contact the author or rewrite the manpage, the effective > license is GPL-2 only. > hi both, thanks to help me. if i understand, if i change the debian/* to GPL-2+ will solved only the patches issues? and still have problem with the upstream man file? my own patch just is trivial and solve spell lintian warning only. i just send a email to the upstream author with this comments also. will need to release a new tarball with this changes? Thanks. -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Bug#817005: RFS: aseqjoy/0.0.1-1 [ITP]
El 06/04/16 a las 05:24, Gianfranco Costamagna escribió: > control: owner -1 ! > control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi, lets review: > > check-all-the-things review: > Please add some upstream metadata: https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata > > Added! (i'm not sure if need i to add more fields.) > > debian/copyright: please use the same upstream license, and for Debian > packaging > > LGPL-2.1 seems unfeasible anyway (I think I read that LGPL is for libraries) Fixed. Is possible to have upstream => gpl2 and debian/* => gpl3, true? > > Standards-Version: 3.9.6 --> 3.9.7 now Fixed. > > please run autoreconf. > (dh --with autoreconf, and a dependency on control file) > Fixed. > > the other stuff LGTM, but I didn't run lintian and a build yet > > (I'll do when you fix the above) > > cheers, > > G. > Thanks for your review, i just upload to mentors with these fixes. Saludos! -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
avoid/delayed service reload on upgrade
Hi all! I packaging mdm[1], a fork from gdm for Huayra[2] (a derivative Debian distribution based on jessie). Our package is based on upstream debian directory with some customized settings[3] to work better with our distro. At this time, MDM work perfect in our system. Now, i focused on get full working with systemd (and better plymouth integration). If i use systemd (not sysvinit) for start the service, i get a kill to xserver when upgrading the package from one version to another. Im search the better way (if is possible) to avoid the restart of the service when uprading. maybe fixing the .service file? I think that systemd receive a "reload or restart" message to the daemon when upgrading that kill the actual xserver instance. This produce two problems, if you try to upgrade from x desktop, first kill entire xserver, second break the dpkg database because the package is not correctly finish the installation. [1]https://github.com/linuxmint/mdm [2]http://huayra.conectarigualdad.gob.ar [3]https://github.com/HuayraLinux/huayra-mdm. Thanks! -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Bug#817005: RFS: aseqjoy/0.0.1-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "aseqjoy" * Package name: aseqjoy Version : 0.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Alexander Koenig <a...@lisas.de> * URL : https://terminatorx.org/addons * License : GPL-2 Section : sound It builds those binary packages: aseqjoy- Joystick to ALSA MIDI Sequencer Converter To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/aseqjoy Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aseqjoy/aseqjoy_0.0.1-1.dsc More information about aseqjoy can be obtained from https://terminatorx.org/addons Changes since the last upload: fixes lintian warnings and try to hardening thanks! -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Re: syncterm/1.0+dfsg-1 [ITP]
Hi John, You have still have interest in sponsoring SyncTerm? the bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777651 was archive. Its posible to unarchive it or must i create another rfs bug request? thanks! -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Re: syncterm/1.0+dfsg-1 [ITP]
El 03/02/16 a las 01:25, Robert James Clay escribió: > On Monday, February 01, 2016 08:49:10 AM Fernando Toledo wrote: >> >> Hi all! >> >> I upload a new version of SyncTerm package. >> >> feel free for comments/reviews! >> >> http://mentors.debian.net/package/syncterm > > Glad to see that you were able to update the package! > > > > > > > Jame > j...@rocasa.us > rjc...@gmail.com > > yeah. im busy but i still active and want to get syncterm into debian archive (someday) -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Re: Bug#777651: RFS: syncterm/20141022+dfsg-1 [ITP]
Hi all! I upload a new version of SyncTerm package. feel free for comments/reviews! http://mentors.debian.net/package/syncterm Thanks! Saludos! -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Re: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]
El 03/01/16 a las 11:44, Robert James Clay escribió: > On Sunday, November 29, 2015 02:25:05 AM Robert James Clay wrote: > >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "multimail" > >I am still looking for a sponsor for the package I am adopting, > "multimail"; or at least a review(s), if not sponsoring. It can be > downloaded > as follows: > > dget -x > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/multimail/multimail_0.50~20150922-1.dsc > > Hi Robert, i just build it with pbuilder on jessie chroot and works fine. I hope that you get a sponsor to upload. Saludos! -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Bug#777651: RFS: syncterm/20141022+dfsg-1 [ITP]
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 10:24:21 +0800 Paul Wise <p...@debian.org> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 5:09 AM, Fernando Toledo wrote: > > > So why the package was removed from mentor, is it expired or the > > license issue? > > Packages are removed from mentors automatically after a period of > inactivity. It has been months since the last upload of syncterm so > probably you hit the limit. > > -- > bye, > pabs > > https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise > > Ok. i have good news! i received good response for the zmodem files owner. Jacques Mattheij do transfer the copyright to SyncTerm developers. http://cvs.synchro.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/src/sbbs3/zmodem.c?revision=1.119=markup http://cvs.synchro.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/src/sbbs3/zmodem.h?revision=1.54=markup i hope that this notice avoid this copyright issue. I will working on update the package and re-upload to mentors on few days. thanks. -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Bug#777651: RFS: syncterm/20141022+dfsg-1 [ITP]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El 15/11/15 a las 06:42, Gianfranco Costamagna escribió: > Hi Fernando, > > On Sat, 27 Jun 2015 16:57:18 -0300 Ragnarok > <ragna...@docksud.com.ar> wrote: >> i just upload a new version on mentors: > >> https://mentors.debian.net/package/syncterm > >> i apreciated any comments > > > are you still interested in this package? > > cheers, > > G. > >> -- Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar >> telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar > > Yes! I have news, i get contact withe the zmodem.* files author. So why the package was removed from mentor, is it expired or the license issue? I can re-upload the latest version if you need. - -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlZI9J0ACgkQrka4e4h7i+OMAwCfVu+IMl6pcA/ZiFcXf0ZvjTxW 1ZIAoLNQIPoDZc3yRNJ03mz0lmGs5prx =Dtf7 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Broken tar invocation in mk-origtargz
El 11/08/15 a las 16:31, Joachim Breitner escribió: Hi, Am Sonntag, den 09.08.2015, 14:33 +0200 schrieb Felix Natter: I don't mind fixing this (in the next few days), but also see no problem in filing a tag=newcomer bug against devscripts ([mk-origtargz]) for fixing in debconf, mentioning the workaround. (This is a pretty bad bug, but it's already broken in jessie, so it probably doesn't matter whether it's fixed tomorrow or next month) I wanted to know if uscan can handle pandoc, so I just fixed it: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/devscripts.git/commit/?id=13f5c48414547b627501d782aa502d3b916bb0b7 Greetings, Joachim thanks, this fix will backported to jessie? -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Re: uscan and missing files
El 06/08/15 a las 16:12, Felix Natter escribió: I think it is very unlikely that this is due to a bug in uscan (also see deleting 1 files from it. above). yes maybe is a bug (very strange) in uscan Maybe you have an old ../syncterm-1.0.tgz around? Can you try with a clean ..? Yes. I have these results with clear .. directory Can you provide a VCS URL so we can try? Yes, i track on github, please note that you must clone the 1.0 branch: https://github.com/ftoledo/pkg-syncterm/tree/1.0/debian Cheers and Best Regards, thanks -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55c3bc76.1050...@docksud.com.ar
uscan and missing files
Hi i setup a watch file for my syncterm package that now is released on sf.net: version=3 http://sf.net/syncterm/syncterm-(\d\S*)\.(?:zip|tgz|tbz|txz|(?:tar\.(?:gz|bz2|xz))) (the url of course is a one line) then use uscan --verbose --force-download --repack -- Scanning for watchfiles in . -- Found watchfile in ./debian -- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line: http://sf.net/syncterm/syncterm-(\d\S*)\.(?:zip|tgz|tbz|txz|(?:tar\.(?:gz|bz2|xz))) -- Found the following matching hrefs: /watch/sf.php/syncterm/syncterm-1.0.tgz (1.0) Newest version on remote site is 1.0, local version is 1.0 = Package is up to date Newest version on remote site is 1.0, local version is 1.0 = Forcing download as requested -- Downloading updated package syncterm-1.0.tgz -- Checking for common possible upstream OpenPGP signatures -- Successfully downloaded updated package syncterm-1.0.tgz -- Successfully repacked ../syncterm-1.0.tgz as ../syncterm_1.0.orig.tar.gz, deleting 1 files from it. -- Scan finished now i have the upstream tgz and the orig.tgz (repacked) files: -rw-r--r-- 1 ragnarok ragnarok 2355449 ago 5 12:21 syncterm_1.0.orig.tar.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 ragnarok ragnarok 8310619 ago 5 12:20 syncterm-1.0.tgz i put a Files-Excluded in my debian/copyright to exclude on zip file that have shipped in the upstream source: Files-Excluded: 3rdp/dist/cryptlib.zip this .zip file in correctly excluded, but my problem is that the upstream .desktop and .png icon also are excluded. if i diff the tarbarls file list, i get: http://paste.debian.net/289427/ why src/sycnterm/syncterm.desktop and src/syncterm/syncterm.png are excluded in the final orig.tar.gz ? i'm search for documentation about this. thanks! -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55c22beb.9080...@docksud.com.ar
new version of syncterm upload to mentors
Hi all! i upload a new version of SyncTerm package http://mentors.debian.net/package/syncterm The respective dsc file can be found at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/syncterm/syncterm_20150627+dfsg-1.dsc SyncTerm is the best ANSI BBS client ;) I'm still search for sponsor and appreciated any comments! Saludos! -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/558f0194.2080...@docksud.com.ar
Re: launchpad for debian and autobuilders
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El 12/12/14 a las 05:15, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda escibió: A Divendres, 12 de desembre de 2014, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez va escriure: On 12 December 2014 at 08:57, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda l...@alaxarxa.net wrote: Hi, do you know if exist some place where someone could dput a debian source package and it was built in a clean environtment for a debian distro, as launchpad service for ubuntu? And, if it doesn't exist, could some of you explain why we don't have this? Or, should I have to create a something similar to a jenkins infrastructure to test and build my own packages? Did you test pbuilder? yes, I build my packages with pbuilder, but I'm looking for an automatic place to build packages for debian. i'm test mini-buildd http://mini-buildd.installiert.net/ i think that have some issues but is working - -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlSO704ACgkQrka4e4h7i+MfaQCfYcfuWw9SEdaxhQ3tQrOvLNmL v7kAn3/URMRnJKjlKnufxO/FCH0axZ4g =LiOF -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/548eef4e.6080...@docksud.com.ar
Re: node-webkit
El 14/07/14 18:14, Leo Iannacone escribió: Hi Fernando, AFAIK nobody in JavaScript Team is working on. Consider to join us[0] if you want to package it. Cheers! Leo. [0] - https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript Thanks you. -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53c53c47.20...@docksud.com.ar
node-webkit
is somebody working on node-webkit packaging? https://github.com/rogerwang/node-webkit -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53c420dd.9060...@docksud.com.ar
Bug#751352: RFS: syncterm/20140525-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: whislist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package syncterm * Package name: syncterm Version : 20140525-1 Upstream Author : Stephen Hurd de...@nix.synchro.net * URL : http://syncterm.bbsdev.net * License : GPL 2 Section : comm It builds those binary packages: syncterm - BBS terminal program from Synchronet syncterm-dbg - BBS terminal program from Synchronet To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/syncterm Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/syncterm/syncterm_20140525-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * new upstream release * debug packages depends * debug package should be extra priority (lintian) I want to get into debian because this terminal emulator is the best for support ANSI-BBS console codes. You can see it, finding some screenshoots on internet. It's part of Synchronet BBS, a free BBS system. Regards, Fernando Toledo -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.14-1-rt-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=es_AR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_AR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140612002708.22928.20693.report...@jola.docksud.com.ar.redlocal
Re: Dependency
El 06/05/14 03:35, Jörg Frings-Fürst escribió: Hi, is there a way to determine in how many and in which packages a package is added as a dependency? Jörg maybe using python-debian ? https://upsilon.cc/~zack/blog/posts/2008/07/python-debian_w_dependency_parsing/ https://github.com/raumkraut/python-debian/blob/master/README.deb822 Saludos! -- Fernando Toledo Dock Sud BBS http://bbs.docksud.com.ar telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/536d8246.9000...@docksud.com.ar
